AzTrials
AzTrials

RoboticNCT06454253

Short- and Long-term Outcomes of Robotic vs Laparoscopic Right Colon Cancer: a 10-year Single-center Retrospective Study

An observational study of Robotic and Laparoscopic, run by Taiyuan Li.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this observational study is to evaluate the short-term outcomes and long-term outcomes of robot-assisted right colon group for cancer compared to laparoscopic-assisted right colon group. This is a large sample study based on ten years of clinical data. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 85 years
Conditions the study is for
Robotic, Laparoscopic, Colon Cancer
What is being tested?
Da Vinci Robot Surgical System
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
1,879 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
1 Dec 2014to 30 Apr 2024
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 85 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: The consecutive cases of robotic-assisted or laparoscopic-assisted right colectomy between December 2014 and March 2024. All cases derived from the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University.

Who may be able to join

  • The age is more than 18 years old and less than or equal to 85 years old
  • No distant metastasis (including pelvic cavity, peritoneum, liver, lung, brain, bone, distant lymph node metastasis, etc.) is judged by ultrasound, CT, PET-CT, etc
  • Preoperative colonoscopy showing that the tumor was located in the ileocecal region, ascending colon, hepatic flexure, or transverse colon with pathology showing malignancy
  • signed informed consent. -

Who cannot join

  • multiple primary colorectal cancer
  • recurrent right colon cancer
  • preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy
  • emergency surgery for intestinal obstruction, bleeding or perforation
  • incomplete data and missing follow-up data. -

About this study

Official title: the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University

The goal of this observational study is to evaluate the short-term outcomes and long-term outcomes of robot-assisted right colon group for cancer compared to laparoscopic-assisted right colon group. This is a large sample study based on ten years of clinical data. The main question it aims to answer is: What are the advantages of da Vinci robot right hemicolectomy compared to laparoscopic right hemicolectomy, and is there a difference in long-term efficacy between the two methods.

Read the detailed description

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is highly prevalent worldwide. In China, CRC ranks high among the population of men and women with cancer. The incidence and mortality rates of CRC are rising quickly in developing countries, and it is the fourth most deadly cancer in the world. In particular, the right colon cancer (RCC) is continuously growing in China, and the early symptoms of RCC are not typical. one of the most useful ways for RCC is surgical is a surgical operation. Along with the development of minimally invasive surgery, the use of laparoscopy for colon cancer is widely accepted and has become one symbolic surgical technology. Studies have demonstrated that laparoscopic colonic surgery is related to reduced pain after operation, shorter rehabilitation time, shorter length of hospital stay, reduced the time of ileus after surgery, and reduced surgical site infection.

Nevertheless, laparoscopic surgery also has its shortcoming, including a limited range of motion, slow learning and growth, and physiological tremor cannot be eliminated.The emergence of robots has broken the inherent disadvantage of laparoscopy. It has achieved similar or better results in previous studies. Based on these advantages, robotic surgery has received much attention from the surgeons. With the first robotic surgery in the field of colon cancer was reported in 2002, there are some studies proved the safety and feasibility by using robot,However, most studies with small sample sizes and with cases at a relatively early stage.

Therefore, the purpose of this study is to compare the short-term and long-term outcomes between RARC and LARC in the treatment of right colon cancer in our center.

Being tested
Da Vinci Robot Surgical System
Medical subject headings
Colonic Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Da Vinci Robot Surgical SystemDevice

    Also called Laparoscopic surgical system

    Performing surgery on right colon cancer patients using the da Vinci robotic surgical system or laparoscopic surgical system

Study groups in NCT06454253
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
robot-assisted right colon groupRobot assisted radical surgery for right colon cancer
Receives: Device: Da Vinci Robot Surgical System
laparoscopic-assisted right colon groupLaparoscopic assisted radical surgery for right colon cancer
Receives: Device: Da Vinci Robot Surgical System

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. overall survival

    months

    Measured: 5 years after surgery

  2. disease-free survival

    months

    Measured: 5 years after surgery

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. the rate of postoperative complications

    rate

    Measured: 1 months after surgery

  2. operative time

    minutes

    Measured: Intraoperative

  3. estimation of blood loss

    milliliters

    Measured: Intraoperative

  4. number of retrieved lymph nodes

    numbers

    Measured: Intraoperative

  5. days after postoperative hospital stay

    days

    Measured: 1 months after surgery

  6. time to first exhaust

    hours

    Measured: 1 weeks after surgery

  7. time to liquid diet

    hours

    Measured: 1 weeks after surgery

  8. the rate of intracorporeal anastomosis

    rate

    Measured: 1 months after surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Jun 2024
  2. Study start1 Dec 2014
  3. Primary completion31 Mar 2024
  4. Study completion30 Apr 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
1,879 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06454253
Sponsor's protocol ID
IIT2023015
Status last verified
Jun 2024
First submitted
29 May 2024
Last updated
12 Jun 2024
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided: Access to the database can be obtained from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Robotic and Laparoscopic, run by Taiyuan Li.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Jun 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

overall survival (time frame: 5 years after surgery). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Jun 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in