AzTrials
AzTrials

Tricuspid Valve DiseaseTRICAV-IINCT06458907

A Prospective, Randomized Multicenter Clinical Trial of the TricValve® Transcatheter Bicaval Valve System in Subjects With Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation.

A study testing TricValve System and Optimal medical therapy in people with Tricuspid Valve Disease and Heart Valve Diseases, run by P+F Products + Features USA Inc. at 34 sites in United States.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

Pivotal trial to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the P\&F TricValve® Transcatheter Bicaval Valve System. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 85 years
What is being tested?
TricValve System and Optimal medical therapy
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
780 participants
Where
34 sitesUnited States
Study dates
Oct 2026to Nov 2032
Phase
Interventional

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 85 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age between 18 years and 85 years old, at the time of signing the informed consent.
  • Severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) and Caval Reflux (CR), as determined by the qualifying transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) confirmed by an echocardiography Core Lab. TVARC criteria will be used for the definition of TR severity.
  • NYHA Class II-III-IVa (not on inotropes, IABP or LVAD) or heart failure (HF) admission in the past 6 months.
  • Adequately treated with optimal medical therapy (OMT) for heart failure per the local Heart Team at the time of TR assessment for eligibility (TTE). OMT includes stable oral diuretic medications.
  • High risk for open surgery and is appropriate for transcatheter tricuspid therapies according to the local heart team.
  • Patient is unsuitable for approved transcatheter therapies and is eligible for the TricValve procedure, based on review of screening/baseline data and imaging core lab measurements by Central Screening Committee.
Show all 17Show fewer
  • For females of childbearing potential, negative pregnancy test.
  • Capable and willing to provide signed informed consent
  • Age > 85 years.
  • NYHA Class III-IV, on intravenous inotropes, IABP or LVAD.
  • LVEF ≤ 30% on echocardiography.
  • Severe RV dysfunction.
  • Severe pulmonary hypertension (PH), defined as Pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) >65 mmHg assessed with Echo Doppler and /or mean Pulmonary Artery Pressure (mPAP >35) by right heart catheterization.
  • Renal insufficiency: eGFR between 25 and 30 mL/min/ 1.73 m² or on chronic renal replacement therapy.
  • Patient unable to walk a minimum distance of 100 mt during 6 minute walk test.
  • Prior malignancy not meeting the requirements applied for the Randomized Cohort, specified in Exclusion Criterion #23.
  • Comorbidities precluding inclusion in the Randomized Cohort (exclusion criteria #15 to #24).

Who cannot join

  • CONCOMITANT PROCEDURES
  • Patient had a recent MI, stroke, or cardiovascular accident; underwent coronary artery bypass graft surgery, had a percutaneous coronary intervention or other major cardiovascular surgery within 90 days prior to TricValve implantation.
  • Patient requires another planned major cardiac procedure, including left-sided transcatheter intervention or surgery (e.g. severe aortic stenosis, severe mitral regurgitation), coronary artery bypass or PCI or pulmonary valve correction.
  • CARDIOVASCULAR CONDITIONS
  • LVEF ≤ 30% on echocardiography.
  • Evidence of intracardiac, inferior vena cava (IVC), or femoral venous mass, thrombus or vegetation.
Show all 35Show fewer
  • Severe right ventricular dysfunction.
  • Cardiac amyloidosis.
  • Pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) >65 mmHg assessed with Echo Doppler and /or right heart catheterization.
  • Lower extremity venous thrombosis and/or the presence of an IVC filter at the time of or 6 months prior to the TricValve procedure.
  • Hemodynamically significant pericardial effusion.
  • Hemodynamic instability, cardiogenic shock, inotropic support, intra-aortic balloon pump or acute heart failure within 30 days prior to the TricValve procedure.
  • Patient with refractory heart failure requiring advanced intervention (i.e. left ventricular assist device, transplantation) (ACC/ AHA/ ESC/ EACTS Stage D heart failure).
  • Presence of significant congenital or acquired heart disease such as RV dysplasia, arrhythmogenic RV or other conditions that could interfere with the TricValve procedure.
  • ALLERGIES / INTOLERANCE
  • Any known allergy or hypersensitivity to nitinol, bovine tissue, or contrast media that cannot be adequately treated with pre-medication.
  • Unable to tolerate anticoagulation/antiplatelet therapy
  • COMORBIDITIES
  • Any known life-threatening condition with an estimated life span of less than 12 months.
  • Platelet count < 75,000/mm3
  • Child-Pugh Severity Class C (10-15 points).
  • Severe renal insufficiency with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≤ 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 or requiring chronic renal replacement therapy at the time of enrollment.
  • Endocarditis or active/ongoing infection requiring antibiotics.
  • Unable to walk at least 100 meters in a 6-minute walk test.
  • Known bleeding or clotting disorders or patient refuses blood transfusion.
  • Active gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding within 3 months of TricValve procedure.
  • Prior Malignancy: this study excludes participants at material risk of near-term cancer-related morbidity/mortality that could confound 12-month outcomes. This study allows the inclusion of fully treated, remote malignancies with documented No Evidence of Disease (NED)" criteria
  • History of any malignancy within 5 years prior to randomization or any active malignancy, except: i. Adequately treated non-melanoma skin cancer (basal or squamous cell) with no evidence of disease, or ii. Carcinoma in situ (e.g., cervical, breast DCIS) treated with curative intent and no evidence of disease.
  • Participants with a prior malignancy diagnosed >5 years before randomization are eligible if they meet all of the "No Evidence of Disease (NED)" criteria as specified below: i. No signs/symptoms of cancer on history and physical exam per standard of care; ii. No radiologic evidence of disease on surveillance imaging if such imaging is routinely indicated for that tumor type (not protocol-mandated); iii. Tumor markers (if applicable for that cancer) not suggestive of recurrence (e.g., stable/undetectable within site's lab reference and oncologist's judgment); iv. No active anti-cancer therapy (cytotoxic chemotherapy, immunotherapy, targeted therapy, radiotherapy) and none planned; v. Treating oncologist's attestation (or primary physician if oncology follow-up is complete) that the participant is disease-free and appropriate for participation.
  • GENERAL EXCLUSIONS
  • Use or participation in other investigational device or drug study in which the patient has not reached a primary endpoint to treat cardiovascular conditions related to the outcomes of the current study.
  • Any other condition that would preclude the ability to meet study requirements in the opinion of the investigator.
  • Psychiatric/behavioral issues or other medical or social conditions that preclude valid consent and follow-up
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding subjects and those who plan pregnancy during the clinical investigation follow-up period.
  • Eligibility Criteria for Single Arm Cohort:

Trial locations and contacts

34 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

34 sites in 1 country

United States34 sites
  • University of Alabama

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35233

  • Massachusetts General Hospital

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02114

  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02215

  • Lahey Hospital & Medical Center

    Burlington, Massachusetts, 01805

  • MUSC

    Charleston, South Carolina, 29425

  • UVA School of Medicine

    Charlottesville, Virginia, 22903

  • Cleveland Clinic

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44106

    Rishi Puri, MD

  • Riverside Methodist Hospital

    Columbus, Ohio, 43214

  • Delray Medical Center

    Delray Beach, Florida, 33484

  • Endeavor Health

    Glenview, Illinois, 60026

  • Hackensack University Medical Center

    Hackensack, New Jersey, 07601

  • Cardiovascular Institute of the South

    Houma, Louisiana, 70360

    Taylor Gregoire, 985-873-5040 ext. 5040, taylor.gregoire@cardio.com

    Peter Fail, MD

  • Houston Methodist

    Houston, Texas, 77030

  • University of Texas (Memorial Hermann)

    Houston, Texas, 77030

  • Ascension Medical Group St. Vincent The Heart Center of Indiana

    Indianapolis, Indiana, 46260

  • University of Kansas Medical Center

    Kansas City, Kansas, 66103

  • Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute

    Kansas City, Missouri, 64111

  • HCA Florida Largo Hospital

    Largo, Florida, 33770

    Saurabh Sanon, MD

  • Northwell Hospital

    Manhasset, New York, 11030

  • Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation

    Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55407

  • Intermountain Heart Institute - Intermountain Medical Center

    Murray, Utah, 84107

  • Sentara Healthcare

    Norfolk, Virginia, 23507

  • St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85013

  • Baylor Scott & White Medical

    Plano, Texas, 75093

  • Oregon Health

    Portland, Oregon, 97239

  • Carilion Clinic

    Roanoke, Virginia, 24014

  • UC Davis Health

    Sacramento, California, 95817

  • Scripps Memorial Hospital La Jolla

    San Diego, California, 92037

  • UCSF

    San Francisco, California, 94143

  • Kaiser Permanente

    San Jose, California, 94118

  • Washington University of St Louis

    St Louis, Missouri, 63110

  • Tampa General Hospital

    Tampa, Florida, 33606

  • Montefiore Medical Center

    The Bronx, New York, 10467

  • MedStar Washington Hospital Center (MWHC)

    Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010

    Erin Collins

    Toby Rogers, MD

Other trials in United States

About this study

Pivotal trial to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the P\&F TricValve® Transcatheter Bicaval Valve System.

Read the detailed description

The study is a prospective, multi-center, randomized controlled pivotal clinical trial to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the TricValve System with optimal medical therapy (OMT) compared to OMT alone in the treatment of patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation and unsuitable for approved transcatheter therapies. Subjects will be followed at discharge, 1 month, 30 days, 3 months, 6 months 12 months, and annually up to 5 years.

Being tested
TricValve System, Optimal medical therapy
Medical subject headings
Heart Valve Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases, Heart Failure, Tricuspid Valve Insufficiency

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • TricValve SystemDevice

    Also called Heterotopic caval valve implantation (CAVI)

    • Heterotopic Transcatheter Valve Replacement (TVR) with the TricValve System in conjunction with optimal medical therapy
  • Optimal medical therapyDrug

    Also called OMT

    Optimal medical therapy

Study groups in NCT06458907
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
TricValve System + Optimal medical therapy (OMT)ExperimentalHeterotopic Transcatheter Valve Replacement (TVR) with the TricValve System in conjunction with optimal medical therapy (OMT) in patients with caval reflux and tricuspid regurgitation.
Receives: Device: TricValve System; Drug: Optimal medical therapy
Optimal medical therapy (OMT) AloneActive comparatorOMT alone in patients with caval reflux and tricuspid regurgitation
Receives: Drug: Optimal medical therapy
TricValve Single Arm RegistryExperimentalSingle-Arm Registry for Heterotopic Transcatheter Valve Replacement (TVR) with the TricValve System in conjunction with OMT in patients with caval reflux and tricuspid regurgitation who are not eligible for randomization
Receives: Device: TricValve System; Drug: Optimal medical therapy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Randomized Cohort: Caval Reflux (CR) grade reduction

    Reduction in Caval Reflux (CR) assessed by the echocardiography core laboratory. The CR will be assessed using the 3-grade scale: Grade 1 (no reflux, reflux extending for less than 1 cm below the diaphragm), Grade 2 ( reflux extending for less than 3 cm), Grade 3 (reflux of 3 cm or more). Lower grades of CR are better.

    Measured: 6 months

  2. Randomized Cohort: Hierarchical composite endpoint including: Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) improvement, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class improvement, and 6-minute walk test distance improvement

    Comparison of clinical outcomes using a single hierarchical analysis. Treatment effect will be summarized using Win Ratio statistics, where a value greater than 1 indicates improved outcomes in the experimental group compared with the comparator arm.

    Measured: 6 months

  3. Randomized Cohort: Rate of Major Adverse Events (MAE)

    Rate of Major Adverse Events (MAE) in experimental arm (TricValve + OMT)

    Measured: 30 days

  4. Randomized Cohort: Hierarchical composite endpoint: all-cause mortality, RVAD implantation or heart transplant, tricuspid valve surgery or percutaneous tricuspid intervention, heart failure hospitalizations, KCCQ improvement, NYHA functional class improv

    Comparison of clinical outcomes using a single hierarchical analysis. Treatment effect will be summarized using Win Ratio statistics, where a value greater than 1 indicates improved outcomes in the experimental group compared with the comparator arm.

    Measured: 1 year

  5. Registry Cohort: Rate of Major Adverse Events (MAE)

    Rate of Major Adverse Events (MAE) in single arm registry

    Measured: 30 days

Secondary outcomes (18)
  1. Randomized Cohort: Percentage of Device- and/or Procedure-related MAEs

    Rate of Major Adverse Events

    Measured: 1 year

  2. Randomized Cohort: All-Cause mortality and Cardiovascular Mortality

    Number of deaths from any cause as well as cardiovascular events

    Measured: 6 months and 1 year

  3. Randomized Cohort: Heart Failure Hospitalizations (HFH)

    Number of Heart Failure Hospitalizations and worsening HF events without hospitilization

    Measured: 6 months and 1 year

  4. Randomized Cohort: RVAD Implantation or Heart Transplant

    Number of patients requiring RVAD Implantation or Heart Transplant

    Measured: 6 months and 1 year

  5. Randomized Cohort: Atrial Fibrillation

    New onset of atrial fibrillation

    Measured: 1 year

  6. Randomized Cohort: Quality of life as measured by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) .

    Improvement of at least 10 points from baseline. KCCQ overall summary score is a patient-reported measure of health status, ranging from 0 to 100, where higher scores reflect better Quality of Life (QOL)

    Measured: 6 months and 1 year

  7. Randomized Cohort: Changes in symptom status New York Heart Association (NYHA class)

    Reduction of at least 1 class from baseline. The NYHA functional classification system categorizes heart failure patients into 4 classes based on physical activity limitation and symptom severity: class I (no symptoms and no limitation in ordinary physical activity), class II (mild symptoms and slight limitation during ordinary activity), class III (marked limitation in activity due to symptoms, even during less-than-ordinary activity; comfortable only at rest, and class IV (severe limitations; experiences symptoms even while at rest).

    Measured: 6 months and 1 year

  8. Randomized Cohort: Changes in functional capacity (6-minute walk test, 6MWT).

    Improvement of 6-minute walk distance of at least 30 meters from baseline.

    Measured: 6 months and 1 year

  9. Registry Cohort: Heart Failure Hospitalization

    Comparison of the 12-month post-procedure HFH rate with the 12-month pre-procedure rate

    Measured: 1 year

  10. Registry Cohort: Changes in Quality of life (by Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) overall summary score).

    Change from baseline to 12 months. KCCQ overall summary score is a patient-reported measure of health status, ranging from 0 to 100, where higher scores reflect better Quality of Life (QOL)

    Measured: 1 year

  11. Roll-In Cohort: Percentage of Device- and/or Procedure-related MAEs

    Rate of Major Adverse Events

    Measured: 1 year

  12. Roll-In Cohort: All-Cause mortality and Cardiovascular Mortality

    Number of deaths from any cause as well as cardiovascular events

    Measured: 6 months and 1 year

  13. Roll-In Cohort: Heart Failure Hospitalizations (HFH)

    Number of Heart Failure Hospitalizations and worsening HF events without hospitalization

    Measured: 6 months and 1 year

  14. Roll-In Cohort: RVAD Implantation or Heart Transplant

    Number of patients requiring RVAD Implantation or Heart Transplant

    Measured: 6 months and 1 year

  15. Roll-In Cohort: Atrial Fibrillation

    New onset of atrial fibrillation

    Measured: 1 year

  16. Roll-In Cohort: Quality of life as measured by Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ).

    Improvement of at least 10 points from baseline. KCCQ overall summary score is a patient-reported measure of health status, ranging from 0 to 100, where higher scores reflect better Quality of Life

    Measured: 6 months and 1 year

  17. Roll-In Cohort: New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class

    Reduction of at least 1 class from baseline. NYHA functional classification system categorizes heart failure patients into 4 classes based on physical activity limitation and symptom severity: class I (no symptoms and no limitation in ordinary physical activity), class II (mild symptoms and slight limitation during ordinary activity), class III (marked limitation in activity due to symptoms, even during less-than-ordinary activity; comfortable only at rest, and class IV (severe limitations; experiences symptoms even while at rest).

    Measured: 6 months and 1 year

  18. Roll-In Cohort: 6-minute walk test (6MWT).

    Improvement of 6-minute walk distance of at least 30 meters from baseline.

    Measured: 6 months and 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Jun 2024
  2. Study startOct 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionNov 2028 (estimated)
  4. Study completionNov 2032 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
780 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06458907
Sponsor's protocol ID
CTP-TRIC-005-II
Acronym
TRICAV-II
Status last verified
Oct 2026
First submitted
7 Jun 2024
Last updated
9 Oct 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Amat-Santos IJ, Estevez-Loureiro R, Sanchez-Recalde A, Cruz-Gonzalez I, Pascual I, Mascherbauer J, Abdul-Jawad Altisent O, Nombela-Franco L, Pan M, Trillo R, Moreno R, Delle Karth G, Blasco-Turrion S, Sanchez-Luna JP, Revilla-Orodoea A, Redondo A, Zamorano JL, Puri R, Iniguez-Romo A, San Roman A. Right heart remodelling after bicaval TricValve implantation in patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation. EuroIntervention. 2023 Aug 7;19(5):e450-e452. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00077. No abstract available.

    PubMed 37083622
  • Blasco-Turrion S, Briedis K, Estevez-Loureiro R, Sanchez-Recalde A, Cruz-Gonzalez I, Pascual I, Mascherbauer J, Abdul-Jawad Altisent O, Nombela-Franco L, Pan M, Trillo R, Moreno R, Delle Karth G, Sanchez-Luna JP, Gonzalez-Gutierrez JC, Revilla-Orodoea A, Zamorano JL, Gomez-Salvador I, Puri R, San Roman JA, Amat-Santos IJ. Bicaval TricValve Implantation in Patients With Severe Symptomatic Tricuspid Regurgitation: 1-Year Follow-Up Outcomes. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Jan 8;17(1):60-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.10.043. Epub 2023 Dec 6.

    PubMed 38069986

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in