Peri-Implantitis and Peri-implant MucositisNCT06475313
Risk Assessment of Proximal Contact Loss Between Implant-supported Prostheses and Adjacent Teeth.
An observational study of Peri-Implantitis and Peri-implant Mucositis, run by Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
In this study, we collected and analysed the review results of 100 patients over 18 years of age who received implant fixed restorations in the Department of Stomatology of the First Hospital of Nanjing, China. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Peri-Implantitis and Peri-implant Mucositis
- What is being tested?
- plaque index assessment, periodontal probing, Bleeding on probing (BOP), Prosthetic adjacency check, initial occlusal contact, maximum occlusal contact, and filling of the cusps.
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Lifestyle or therapy programme
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 1 Jul 2024to 30 Dec 2024
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: One hundred consecutive patients, who had received either implant-supported fixed partial denture (FPD) or implant-supported single crown (SC) in the posterior region and were under regular review, were recruited.
Who may be able to join
- (1) Patients over the age of 18, can fully understand the nature of the proposed and be able to sign a consent form.
- (2) patients who underwent dental implant surgery and delivered prostheses for more than 3 months in Nanjing First Hospital.
Who cannot join
- (1) The implant site or adjacent teeth were severely injured and the adjacent teeth were extracted;
- (2) the same quadrant orthodontic or splint treatment;
- (3) the prostheses have been removed due to failure or need further treatment;
- (4) implant-supported prostheses in both mesial and distal sites;
- (5) the adjacent teeth were directly or indirectly fixed with the implant-supported prosthesis;
- (6) patients with missing clinical records of PD, PCR and BOP.
- (7) The prosthetic prosthesis with implant-supported prosthesis was delivered for less than 3 months in Nanjing First Hospital.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
China1 site
Nanjing First Hospital
Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210000
Xin Wu, master, 13770326060, darkie777@163.com
Jiaping Wang, 15563518685, wjpsally@stu.njmu.edu.cn
About this study
In this study, we collected and analysed the review results of 100 patients over 18 years of age who received implant fixed restorations in the Department of Stomatology of the First Hospital of Nanjing, China. The aim was to investigate the incidence of loss of contact between implant restorations and adjacent teeth and its influencing factors. Our findings may provide better insights for treatment planning and prevention of PCL.
Read the detailed description
Food impaction is a common complication after implant-supported restorations. Several studies have reported that more than 40%-66.9% of patients feel food impaction between the implant restoration and adjacent natural teeth. The most common cause of food impaction after implant restoration is the proximal contact loss(PCL), which has been reported to occur in 34% to 65% of cases. The location of PCL creates discomfort and leads to gingival inflammation and even peri-implant bone resorption, which ultimately leads to loosening of the implant. In our long-term clinical observation, not all final restorations suffer from PCL. The occurrence of PCL may be related to a number of factors such as age, gender, functional time, and so on. However, the literature addressing this issue is still limited. In this study, we collected and analysed the review results of selected patients who underwent implant-supported restorations in the First Hospital of Nanjing, China, to investigate the incidence of PCL between the implant restorations and the adjacent teeth adjacent , and the factors influencing it. Our findings may provide better insights for treatment planning and prevention of PCL.
- Being tested
- plaque index assessment, periodontal probing, Bleeding on probing (BOP), Prosthetic adjacency check, initial occlusal contact, maximum occlusal contact, and filling of the cusps.
- Keywords
- food impaction, proximal contact loss, Implant supported prosthesis, Dentition defect, risk factors
- Medical subject headings
- Peri-Implantitis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
plaque index assessment, periodontal probing, Bleeding on probing (BOP), Prosthetic adjacency check, initial occlusal contact, maximum occlusal contact, and filling of the cusps.Behavioural
Also called Radiation
oral panoramic radiograph
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
the proximal contact surface was adjusted by a dental floss (Reach waxed dental floss from Johnson & Johnson, standard thickness)
The degree of proximal contact loss(PCL) was evaluated with a dental floss passing through the contact areas and classified as: (a) tight: sufficient resistance to the passage of the floss; (b) loose: insufficient resistance to the passage of the floss; and (c) open: contact: no resistance to the passage of the floss. The presence of an open or loose contact was classified as PCL.
Measured: Patients with implant-supported prostheses reviewed 3 months after delivery were eligible for inclusion in this study.
Secondary outcomes (2)
oral panoramic radiograph
Using the radiograph analysis software's measuring function, the amount of alveolar bone resorption of the implant as well as adjacent teeth was evaluated. (a)The original bone height was measured as the distance between the enamel-cemental junction and the root apex (or the implant neck edge and the implant base). (b)The existing bone height was measured as the distance between the top of the alveolar ridge to the root apex. (c) The height of alveolar bone resorption was calculated by subtracting the original bone height from the existing bone height.
Measured: Patients with implant-supported prostheses reviewed 3 months after delivery were eligible for inclusion in this study.
Bausch Arti-Fol R metallic Shimstock-Film
(a) Initial occlusal contact: Bausch articulating paper was applied to the restoration's occlusal surface, the patient was told to close their mouth slowly, the teeth just gently touched, and they opened their mouth right away. The paper was then removed, and the restoration's occlusal surface was examined to see if it had left a red mark. (b) Final occlusal contact: If the patient's restoration and opposing jaw teeth do not make contact during the initial occlusion, place the Bausch articulating paper on the restoration's occlusal surface, ask them to clench their teeth, and then have them open their mouth, take the paper out, and check to see if the implant's occlusal surface has any marks on it.
Measured: Patients with implant-supported prostheses reviewed 3 months after delivery were eligible for inclusion in this study.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Jun 2024
- Study start1 Jul 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completion30 Sep 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Dec 2024 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Peri-Implantitis and Peri-implant MucositisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Changao Xue, Master, Principal investigator, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical UniversityNing Luo, Master, Principal investigator, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical UniversityJuan Lin, Master, Principal investigator, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06475313
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- KY20240613-05
- Status last verified
- Jun 2024
- First submitted
- 20 Jun 2024
- Last updated
- 26 Jun 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Information about participants in this study will not be shared with investigators outside the study, and all study participants are identified by initials.
Publications
Yen JY, Kang L, Chou IC, Lai YL, Lee SY. Risk assessment of interproximal contact loss between implant-supported fixed prostheses and adjacent teeth: A retrospective radiographic study. J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Jan;127(1):86-92. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.06.023. Epub 2020 Nov 7.
PubMed 33172648Bompolaki D, Edmondson SA, Katancik JA. Interproximal contact loss between implant-supported restorations and adjacent natural teeth: A retrospective cross-sectional study of 83 restorations with an up to 10-year follow-up. J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Mar;127(3):418-424. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.09.034. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
PubMed 33342612Liang CH, Nien CY, Chen YL, Hsu KW. The prevalence and associated factors of proximal contact loss between implant restoration and adjacent tooth after function: A retrospective study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2020 Jun;22(3):351-358. doi: 10.1111/cid.12918. Epub 2020 May 17.
PubMed 32419242Gasser TJW, Papageorgiou SN, Eliades T, Hammerle CHF, Thoma DS. Interproximal contact loss at implant sites: a retrospective clinical study with a 10-year follow-up. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022 May;33(5):482-491. doi: 10.1111/clr.13908. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
PubMed 35194854
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Jun 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Risk Assessment of Proximal Contact Loss Between Implant-supported Prostheses and Adjacent Teeth.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06475313
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- KY20240613-05
- Keywords
- food impaction, proximal contact loss, Implant supported prosthesis, Dentition defect, risk factors
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jul 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 30 Sep 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Dec 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 26 Jun 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In this study, we collected and analysed the review results of 100 patients over 18 years of age who received implant fixed restorations in the Department of Stomatology of the First Hospital of Nanjing, China. The aim was to investigate the incidence of loss of contact between implant restorations and adjacent teeth and its influencing factors. Our findings may provide better insights for treatment planning and prevention of PCL.
Detailed description
Food impaction is a common complication after implant-supported restorations. Several studies have reported that more than 40%-66.9% of patients feel food impaction between the implant restoration and adjacent natural teeth. The most common cause of food impaction after implant restoration is the proximal contact loss(PCL), which has been reported to occur in 34% to 65% of cases. The location of PCL creates discomfort and leads to gingival inflammation and even peri-implant bone resorption, which ultimately leads to loosening of the implant. In our long-term clinical observation, not all final restorations suffer from PCL. The occurrence of PCL may be related to a number of factors such as age, gender, functional time, and so on. However, the literature addressing this issue is still limited. In this study, we collected and analysed the review results of selected patients who underwent implant-supported restorations in the First Hospital of Nanjing, China, to investigate the incidence of PCL between the implant restorations and the adjacent teeth adjacent , and the factors influencing it. Our findings may provide better insights for treatment planning and prevention of PCL.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- One hundred consecutive patients, who had received either implant-supported fixed partial denture (FPD) or implant-supported single crown (SC) in the posterior region and were under regular review, were recruited.
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- (1) Patients over the age of 18, can fully understand the nature of the proposed and be able to sign a consent form.
- (2) patients who underwent dental implant surgery and delivered prostheses for more than 3 months in Nanjing First Hospital.
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- (1) The implant site or adjacent teeth were severely injured and the adjacent teeth were extracted;
- (2) the same quadrant orthodontic or splint treatment;
- (3) the prostheses have been removed due to failure or need further treatment;
- (4) implant-supported prostheses in both mesial and distal sites;
- (5) the adjacent teeth were directly or indirectly fixed with the implant-supported prosthesis;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| plaque index assessment, periodontal probing, Bleeding on probing (BOP), Prosthetic adjacency check, initial occlusal contact, maximum occlusal contact, and filling of the cusps.Also: Radiationoral panoramic radiograph | Behavioural | – |
Primary outcome
the proximal contact surface was adjusted by a dental floss (Reach waxed dental floss from Johnson & Johnson, standard thickness)
Time frame: Patients with implant-supported prostheses reviewed 3 months after delivery were eligible for inclusion in this study.
The degree of proximal contact loss(PCL) was evaluated with a dental floss passing through the contact areas and classified as: (a) tight: sufficient resistance to the passage of the floss; (b) loose: insufficient resistance to the passage of the floss; and (c) open: contact: no resistance to the passage of the floss. The presence of an open or loose contact was classified as PCL.
2 secondary outcomes
oral panoramic radiograph
Time frame: Patients with implant-supported prostheses reviewed 3 months after delivery were eligible for inclusion in this study.
Bausch Arti-Fol R metallic Shimstock-Film
Time frame: Patients with implant-supported prostheses reviewed 3 months after delivery were eligible for inclusion in this study.
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Jun 2024.
- Background: PubMed 33172648Yen JY, Kang L, Chou IC, Lai YL, Lee SY. Risk assessment of interproximal contact loss between implant-supported fixed prostheses and adjacent teeth: A retrospective radiographic study. J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Jan;127(1):86-92. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.06.023. Epub 2020 Nov 7.
- Background: PubMed 33342612Bompolaki D, Edmondson SA, Katancik JA. Interproximal contact loss between implant-supported restorations and adjacent natural teeth: A retrospective cross-sectional study of 83 restorations with an up to 10-year follow-up. J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Mar;127(3):418-424. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.09.034. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
- Background: PubMed 32419242Liang CH, Nien CY, Chen YL, Hsu KW. The prevalence and associated factors of proximal contact loss between implant restoration and adjacent tooth after function: A retrospective study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2020 Jun;22(3):351-358. doi: 10.1111/cid.12918. Epub 2020 May 17.
- Background: PubMed 35194854Gasser TJW, Papageorgiou SN, Eliades T, Hammerle CHF, Thoma DS. Interproximal contact loss at implant sites: a retrospective clinical study with a 10-year follow-up. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022 May;33(5):482-491. doi: 10.1111/clr.13908. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Information about participants in this study will not be shared with investigators outside the study, and all study participants are identified by initials.
Related trials for Peri-Implantitis and Peri-implant Mucositis
RecruitingObservational study
Evaluation of 25(OH)D3 and LL-37 Levels in Periimplant Sulcus Fluid
Peri Implantitis, Peri Implant Mucositis
RecruitingObservational study
Impact of Smoking on Immune Responses in Peri-implant Health and Disease
Peri-Implant Health, Peri Implant Mucositis
Not yet recruitingEarly Phase 1
Reconstructive Treatment of Peri-implantitis With Electrolytic Decontamination Versus Titanium Brushes
Peri-Implantitis and Peri-implant Mucositis
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Local and Systemic Inflammatory Bone Alterations Related to Dental Implant Survival.
Peri Implant Mucositis, Peri Implant Bone Loss
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Evaluation of aMMP-8 and IL-1β Levels and Marginal Bone Loss Associated With Peri-Implant Mucositis and Peri-Implantitis in Postmenopausal Women
Postmenopausal Peri-implant Health, Postmenopausal Peri-mucositis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Changao Xue, Master principal investigator
The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University
Ning Luo, Master principal investigator
The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University
Juan Lin, Master principal investigator
The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Peri-Implantitis and Peri-implant Mucositis, run by Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Jun 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Xin Wu, Master (13770326060, darkie777@163.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
the proximal contact surface was adjusted by a dental floss (Reach waxed dental floss from Johnson & Johnson, standard thickness) (time frame: Patients with implant-supported prostheses reviewed 3 months after delivery were eligible for inclusion in this study.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06475313, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Jun 2024.