Diabetic NeuropathiesNCT06482827
Treatment for Diabetic Neuropathy Using Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
A study testing Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in people with Diabetic Neuropathies, run by McMaster University at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
The aim of this study is to determine whether a 4-week treatment of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) can alleviate the symptoms of neuropathy in individuals with diabetic neuropathy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Diabetic Neuropathies
- What is being tested?
- Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 18 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2025to 31 Dec 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- A diagnosis of diabetic neuropathy
Who cannot join
- Contraindications to transcranial magnetic stimulation
- Known psychological diagnosis affecting comprehension
- Inability to participate in the study
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Neuropathy in Diabetic Neuropathy: A Pilot Study
The aim of this study is to determine whether a 4-week treatment of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) can alleviate the symptoms of neuropathy in individuals with diabetic neuropathy. The study will involve using questionnaires, nerve assessments, sensory tests, blood flow measurements, and blood tests to monitor any changes in symptoms after the rTMS intervention.
Read the detailed description
Diabetic neuropathy (DN) is one of the most common complications of diabetes, occurring in ~50% of patients. DN results from damage to the peripheral and autonomic nervous systems. Due to the damage to small peripheral nerve fibers, patients often do not properly perceive local traumas because of the absence of pain perception and vibration perception. The upper and lower limbs are the most commonly affected areas among individuals with DN, putting patients at a higher risk of developing skin ulcerations and undergoing amputations. DN is characterized by various symptoms including numbness, loss of sensation, tingling, weakness, pain, unsteadiness, loss of vibration sense and abnormal temperature (often cold). DN is associated with decreased quality of life, depression, sleep disturbance and anxiety. It is currently managed by the control of blood glucose levels, medications to relieve pain and symptoms, physical therapy and lifestyle modifications. The global prevalence of DN is increasing, leading to a high incidence of lower limp amputations in the DN population, which accounts for approximately 70% of non-traumatic amputations worldwide. DN is also correlated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease and leads to an increase in mortality of diabetic patients. Therefore, it is crucial to find new ways to improve neuropathy in patients living with DN.
A novel approach to treating neuropathy is through the induction of neuroplasticity. Neuroplasticity refers to the ability of the brain to change, either through structural reorganization or functional changes in brain activation. Neuroplasticity can be induced non-invasively with a form of brain stimulation known as repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS). rTMS involves an electromagnetic coil placed against the scalp that generates magnetic pulses to induce electric fields in the brain. By delivering these electric fields in rapid succession and at low intensity, functional changes in the brain (i.e. neuroplasticity) can be evoked. rTMS can be used to treat neurodegeneration, blood flow change, autonomic nervous disorders, depression, and vascular endothelial injury. rTMS can produce inhibitory or excitatory stimulation of the cerebral cortex or specific areas, leading to remodeling of the nervous system. This makes it a promising application for promoting nerve regeneration, neuroprotection, and localization of injuries. DN is closely related to cardiovascular disease as DN damages the autonomic nervous system (ANS), which controls heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP). With rTMS, this damage in ANS, specifically, HR and BP, can be improved. Inhibitory stimulation can lower HR while excitatory stimulation can enhance heart rate variability. Both inhibitory and excitatory stimulation can lower BP. Thus, the use of rTMS can improve a variety of functions that could prevent further complications and possibly improve neuropathy, as well.
Inflammation is a crucial factor in the progression of DN, as it involves an increase in chemokine production, inflammatory cell infiltration in the kidney, tissue damage, and production of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Infiltration of inflammatory cells into the kidney can lead to diabetic kidney disease, which is the most prevalent cause of terminal renal failure globally with suboptimal treatment options. Due to the close link between DN and inflammation, reducing inflammation has been suggested as a possible therapeutic option for this population. Additionally, diabetic wounds and inflammation are also associated, therefore controlling inflammation may improve wound management and healing rates. Researchers have recently discovered that rTMS can impact the levels of inflammatory markers (such as IL-1B, IL-6, IL-10, TNF-α, TGF-β, CRP, SP, and BDNF) in other conditions such as depression, post-stroke, and Alzheimer's. The study by Zhao et al. investigated the effects of 20 sessions of rTMS intervention on 29 individuals diagnosed with refractory depression. Significant increases in serum BDNF levels and decreases in IL-1β and TNF-α levels were noted after one week of intervention, compared to healthy individuals, and this trend continued over the 4-week stimulation period. However, there was no change noted in the sham group. Cha et al. conducted a post-stroke study measuring the effects of 10 sessions of rTMS intervention on 10 individuals with post-stroke cognitive impairment. Following the intervention, levels of IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, and TGF-β mRNA decreased. Velioglu et al. explored the effects of 10 sessions of rTMS intervention on 15 individuals with Alzheimer's Disease. An increase in BDNF levels was noted following the conclusion of the intervention. Although no studies have been done in the DN population, the use of rTMS to examine changes in these levels is promising.
The goal of the proposed research is to investigate the use of rTMS to improve the symptoms of neuropathy in patients living with diabetic neuropathy.
- Conditions
- Diabetic Neuropathies
- Being tested
- Sham Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetic Neuropathies
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Sham Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulationDevice
Sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a non-invasive, non-painful procedure. The abductor pollicis brevis (APB) muscle of the left motor cortex will be targeted using neuronavigation software. During the sham, participants will hear and experience the clicking from the device but will not be provided with any stimulation. The delivery of sham rTMS requires ~ 11.5 minutes in total.
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulationDevice
Also called rTMS, Repetitive TMS
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a non-invasive, non-painful procedure used to relieve chronic pain and promote short-term changes. The abductor pollicis brevis (APB) muscle of the left motor cortex will be targeted using neuronavigation software. 2004 pulses will be delivered at 10 Hz stimulation. Stimulation will be delivered at 80% of the resting motor threshold obtained from the right APB muscle. The delivery of rTMS requires ~ 11.5 minutes in total.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group A (Sham) | Sham comparator | Participants in group A will take part in 4 weeks of treatment with 5 sessions per week. Each session will involve sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Sham rTMS will be delivered at 10 Hz, 2004 pulses targeting the leg representation of the primary motor cortex. Participants will hear and experience the clicking but will not be provided with any stimulation. Sham rTMS will take approximately 11.5 minutes. Receives: Device: Sham Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation |
| Group B (Active) | Active comparator | Participants in group B will take part in 4 weeks of treatment with 5 sessions per week. Each session will involve real repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). rTMS will be delivered at 10 Hz, 2004 pulses targeting the leg representation of the primary motor cortex. rTMS will take approximately 11.5 minutes. Receives: Device: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Modified Toronto Clinical Neuropathy Score
Will be used to assess the presence and severity of diabetic neuropathy ('yes' or 'no')
Measured: Immediately before intervention, immediately following intervention, 4 weeks after intervention
PROMIS-29 v2.0 Profile
Using numerical rating (0 to 5) to assess seven health domains including physical function, anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep disturbances, ability to participate in social roles and activities, and pain interference. Each category consists of 4 questions. Also uses a numerical rating to asses pain intensity (0-10).
Measured: Immediately before intervention, immediately following intervention, 4 weeks after intervention
Patient Perceived Global Index of Change (PGIC)
1-7 Likert Scale: Patients rate their change as "very much improved," "much improved," "minimally improved," "no change," "minimally worse," "much worse," or "very much worse
Measured: Immediately following intervention, 4 weeks after intervention
Pain catastrophizing scale-EN-SF
Will be used to assess the patients feeling and emotion related to their pain experience
Measured: Immediately before intervention, immediately following intervention, 4 weeks after intervention
Secondary outcomes (5)
Change in quantitative sensory testing
Will be used in this study to assess somatosensory function to determine underlying pain mechanisms for pain phenotypes. QST will be used to measure detection thresholds for cold, warm, vibration, and mechanical stimuli. Pain thresholds will be assessed for cold, heat, mechanical, and pressure stimuli. In addition, allodynia will be measured.
Measured: Immediately before intervention, immediately following intervention, 4 weeks after intervention
Change in nerve conduction assessments
Non-invasive peripheral nerve stimulation will be delivered using surface bar electrodes placed over the tibial nerve at the popliteal fossa and the medial malleolus. Compound muscle action potential will be recorded with surface electromyography over soleus, gastrocnemius, and abductor hallucis. These measures will be obtained from both lower limbs.
Measured: Immediately before intervention, immediately following intervention
Change in blood flow
Will use color Doppler ultrasound to measure hemodynamic characteristics in diabetic neuropathy. Six major arteries that are responsible for supplying blood to the foot sole will be evaluated including the first common plantar artery, second common plantar artery, third common plantar artery, fourth common plantar artery, posterior tibial artery, and fibular side of the first plantar toe proper artery.
Measured: Immediately before intervention, immediately following intervention
Changes in wound
Will use the app called Swift Skin and Wound to track the changes in wound size over the course of the study
Measured: Immediately before intervention, immediately following intervention
Change in inflammation markers (IL-1B, IL-6, IL-10, TNF-α, TGF-β, CRP, SP, and BDNF)
10 mL of blood will be collected to assess the changes in the levels of inflammatory markers (IL-1B, IL-6, IL-10, TNF-α, TGF-β, CRP, SP, and BDNF)
Measured: Immediately before intervention, immediately following intervention
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Jul 2024
- Study start1 Jan 2025
- Primary completion1 Sep 2025
- Study completion31 Dec 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Diabetic NeuropathiesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by McMaster UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 18 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- McMaster University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Aimee Nelson, McMaster University
- Investigators
- Aimee Nelson, PhD, Principal investigator, McMaster University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06482827
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 17797
- Status last verified
- May 2026
- First submitted
- 26 Jun 2024
- Last updated
- 28 May 2026
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 May 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Neuropathy in Diabetic Neuropathy: A Pilot Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06482827
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 17797
- Conditions
- Diabetic Neuropathies
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 18 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- McMaster UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Sep 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Jul 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this study is to determine whether a 4-week treatment of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) can alleviate the symptoms of neuropathy in individuals with diabetic neuropathy. The study will involve using questionnaires, nerve assessments, sensory tests, blood flow measurements, and blood tests to monitor any changes in symptoms after the rTMS intervention.
Detailed description
Diabetic neuropathy (DN) is one of the most common complications of diabetes, occurring in ~50% of patients. DN results from damage to the peripheral and autonomic nervous systems. Due to the damage to small peripheral nerve fibers, patients often do not properly perceive local traumas because of the absence of pain perception and vibration perception. The upper and lower limbs are the most commonly affected areas among individuals with DN, putting patients at a higher risk of developing skin ulcerations and undergoing amputations. DN is characterized by various symptoms including numbness, loss of sensation, tingling, weakness, pain, unsteadiness, loss of vibration sense and abnormal temperature (often cold). DN is associated with decreased quality of life, depression, sleep disturbance and anxiety. It is currently managed by the control of blood glucose levels, medications to relieve pain and symptoms, physical therapy and lifestyle modifications. The global prevalence of DN is increasing, leading to a high incidence of lower limp amputations in the DN population, which accounts for approximately 70% of non-traumatic amputations worldwide. DN is also correlated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease and leads to an increase in mortality of diabetic patients. Therefore, it is crucial to find new ways to improve neuropathy in patients living with DN.
A novel approach to treating neuropathy is through the induction of neuroplasticity. Neuroplasticity refers to the ability of the brain to change, either through structural reorganization or functional changes in brain activation. Neuroplasticity can be induced non-invasively with a form of brain stimulation known as repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS). rTMS involves an electromagnetic coil placed against the scalp that generates magnetic pulses to induce electric fields in the brain. By delivering these electric fields in rapid succession and at low intensity, functional changes in the brain (i.e. neuroplasticity) can be evoked. rTMS can be used to treat neurodegeneration, blood flow change, autonomic nervous disorders, depression, and vascular endothelial injury. rTMS can produce inhibitory or excitatory stimulation of the cerebral cortex or specific areas, leading to remodeling of the nervous system. This makes it a promising application for promoting nerve regeneration, neuroprotection, and localization of injuries. DN is closely related to cardiovascular disease as DN damages the autonomic nervous system (ANS), which controls heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP). With rTMS, this damage in ANS, specifically, HR and BP, can be improved. Inhibitory stimulation can lower HR while excitatory stimulation can enhance heart rate variability. Both inhibitory and excitatory stimulation can lower BP. Thus, the use of rTMS can improve a variety of functions that could prevent further complications and possibly improve neuropathy, as well.
Inflammation is a crucial factor in the progression of DN, as it involves an increase in chemokine production, inflammatory cell infiltration in the kidney, tissue damage, and production of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Infiltration of inflammatory cells into the kidney can lead to diabetic kidney disease, which is the most prevalent cause of terminal renal failure globally with suboptimal treatment options. Due to the close link between DN and inflammation, reducing inflammation has been suggested as a possible therapeutic option for this population. Additionally, diabetic wounds and inflammation are also associated, therefore controlling inflammation may improve wound management and healing rates. Researchers have recently discovered that rTMS can impact the levels of inflammatory markers (such as IL-1B, IL-6, IL-10, TNF-α, TGF-β, CRP, SP, and BDNF) in other conditions such as depression, post-stroke, and Alzheimer's. The study by Zhao et al. investigated the effects of 20 sessions of rTMS intervention on 29 individuals diagnosed with refractory depression. Significant increases in serum BDNF levels and decreases in IL-1β and TNF-α levels were noted after one week of intervention, compared to healthy individuals, and this trend continued over the 4-week stimulation period. However, there was no change noted in the sham group. Cha et al. conducted a post-stroke study measuring the effects of 10 sessions of rTMS intervention on 10 individuals with post-stroke cognitive impairment. Following the intervention, levels of IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, and TGF-β mRNA decreased. Velioglu et al. explored the effects of 10 sessions of rTMS intervention on 15 individuals with Alzheimer's Disease. An increase in BDNF levels was noted following the conclusion of the intervention. Although no studies have been done in the DN population, the use of rTMS to examine changes in these levels is promising.
The goal of the proposed research is to investigate the use of rTMS to improve the symptoms of neuropathy in patients living with diabetic neuropathy.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group A (Sham) | Sham comparator | Device: Sham Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulationParticipants in group A will take part in 4 weeks of treatment with 5 sessions per week. Each session will involve sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Sham rTMS will be delivered at 10 Hz, 2004 pulses targeting the leg representation of the primary motor cortex. Participants will hear and experience the clicking but will not be provided with any stimulation. Sham rTMS will take approximately 11.5 minutes. |
| Group B (Active) | Active comparator | Device: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulationParticipants in group B will take part in 4 weeks of treatment with 5 sessions per week. Each session will involve real repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). rTMS will be delivered at 10 Hz, 2004 pulses targeting the leg representation of the primary motor cortex. rTMS will take approximately 11.5 minutes. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- A diagnosis of diabetic neuropathy
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Contraindications to transcranial magnetic stimulation
- Known psychological diagnosis affecting comprehension
- Inability to participate in the study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Sham Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulationSham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a non-invasive, non-painful procedure. The abductor pollicis brevis (APB) muscle of the left motor cortex will be targeted using neuronavigation software. During the sham, participants will hear and experience the clicking from the device but will not be provided with any stimulation. The delivery of sham rTMS requires ~ 11.5 minutes in total. | Device | Group A (Sham) |
| Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulationAlso: rTMS, Repetitive TMSRepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a non-invasive, non-painful procedure used to relieve chronic pain and promote short-term changes. The abductor pollicis brevis (APB) muscle of the left motor cortex will be targeted using neuronavigation software. 2004 pulses will be delivered at 10 Hz stimulation. Stimulation will be delivered at 80% of the resting motor threshold obtained from the right APB muscle. The delivery of rTMS requires ~ 11.5 minutes in total. | Device | Group B (Active) |
Primary outcome
Modified Toronto Clinical Neuropathy Score
Time frame: Immediately before intervention, immediately following intervention, 4 weeks after intervention
Will be used to assess the presence and severity of diabetic neuropathy ('yes' or 'no')
PROMIS-29 v2.0 Profile
Time frame: Immediately before intervention, immediately following intervention, 4 weeks after intervention
Using numerical rating (0 to 5) to assess seven health domains including physical function, anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep disturbances, ability to participate in social roles and activities, and pain interference. Each category consists of 4 questions. Also uses a numerical rating to asses pain intensity (0-10).
Patient Perceived Global Index of Change (PGIC)
Time frame: Immediately following intervention, 4 weeks after intervention
1-7 Likert Scale: Patients rate their change as "very much improved," "much improved," "minimally improved," "no change," "minimally worse," "much worse," or "very much worse
Pain catastrophizing scale-EN-SF
Time frame: Immediately before intervention, immediately following intervention, 4 weeks after intervention
Will be used to assess the patients feeling and emotion related to their pain experience
5 secondary outcomes
Change in quantitative sensory testing
Time frame: Immediately before intervention, immediately following intervention, 4 weeks after intervention
Change in nerve conduction assessments
Time frame: Immediately before intervention, immediately following intervention
Change in blood flow
Time frame: Immediately before intervention, immediately following intervention
Changes in wound
Time frame: Immediately before intervention, immediately following intervention
Change in inflammation markers (IL-1B, IL-6, IL-10, TNF-α, TGF-β, CRP, SP, and BDNF)
Time frame: Immediately before intervention, immediately following intervention
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 May 2026.
- Ader, D. N. (2007). Developing the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Medical Care, 45(5), S1.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Bondar, A. C., \& Popa, A. R. (2018). Diabetic Neuropathy Prevalence and Its Associated Risk Factors in Two Representative Groups of Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients from Bihor County. Mædica, 13(3), 229-234.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Callaghan, B., Kerber, K., Langa, K. M., Banerjee, M., Rodgers, A., McCammon, R., Burke, J., \& Feldman, E. (2015). Longitudinal patient-oriented outcomes in neuropathy. Neurology, 85(1), 71-79.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Cha, B. et al. (2022). Therapeutic Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Post-stroke Vascular Cognitive Impairment: A Prospective Pilot Study. Frontiers in Neurology, 13.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Defrin, R et al. (2007). The effect of a series of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulations of the motor cortex on central pain after spinal cord injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 88(12), 1574-1580.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Duran-Salgado, M. B., \& Rubio-Guerra, A. F. (2014). Diabetic nephropathy and inflammation. World Journal of Diabetes, 5(3), 393-398.Link provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Diabetic Neuropathies
Recruiting
PAW-Hydrogel for Chronic Wound Healing
Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU), Pressure Ulcer (PU)
Active, not recruiting
Wearable Insoles for Recurrent Diabetic Ulcer Prevention
Diabetes, Peripheral Neuropathy
Recruiting
Effect of 4-7-8 Breathing Technique on Pain and Anxiety During Electromyography in Diabetic Neuropathy
Diabetic Neuropathies, Diabetes Mellitus (Type 2)
Active, not recruiting
Evaluation of Personalized Nutritional Intervention on Wound Healing of Cutaneous Ulcers in Diabetics
Foot, Diabetic
Active, not recruiting
Comparative Effects Of Sensory Reweighting And Proprioceptive Facilitation Training On Balance And Fall Risk In Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy
Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (DPN)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Aimee Nelson, PhD principal investigator
McMaster University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in people with Diabetic Neuropathies, run by McMaster University at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Modified Toronto Clinical Neuropathy Score (time frame: Immediately before intervention, immediately following intervention, 4 weeks after intervention). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 May 2026.