Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection FractionLBBAPHFNCT06488989
Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Patients With Heart Failure
A study testing left bundle branch area pacing in people with Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction and Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing, run by National Research Center for Cardiac Surgery, Kazakhstan at 1 site in Kazakhstan.
Trial summary
The relevance of Left Bundle Branch Pacing (LBBP) lies in its potential as a promising treatment option for patients with heart failure and left bundle branch block. LBBP aims to restore the normal physiological activation of the heart by delivering electrical impulses to the anatomical area of the left bundle branch… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction, Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing, Heart Failure
- What is being tested?
- left bundle branch area pacing
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- 1 siteKazakhstan
- Study dates
- 1 Jun 2024to 1 Jun 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male or female ≥ 18 years of age at Visit 1.
- Patients with complete left bundle branch block, QRS duration greater than 130 ms, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) less than 35%, and New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class 2-3, who have been ineffective on optimal medical therapy for at least 3 months.
- Written informed consent (and assent when applicable) obtained from subject or subject's legal representative and ability for subject to comply with the requirements of the study.
Who cannot join
- Pregnancy.
- Psychic disturbances.
- Presence of a condition or abnormality that in the opinion of the Investigator would compromise the safety of the patient or the quality of the data - life expectancy less than 1 year.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
The relevance of Left Bundle Branch Pacing (LBBP) lies in its potential as a promising treatment option for patients with heart failure and left bundle branch block. LBBP aims to restore the normal physiological activation of the heart by delivering electrical impulses to the anatomical area of the left bundle branch, which may lead to more effective and synchronized ventricular contractions. Compared to traditional cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), this can result in a more physiological correction of dyssynchrony, improvement in left ventricular pump function, reduction in left ventricular volumes, and a decrease in mitral regurgitation. A crucial criterion is the reduction of heart failure symptoms and the enhancement of the patients quality of life.
Read the detailed description
The aim The aim of Left Bundle Branch Pacing (LBBP) research is to assess its effectiveness in improving the contractile capacity of the left ventricular myocardium. The objectives are as follows
- To determine the optimal patient selection criteria;
- To assess long-term outcomes;
- To investigate safety and complications;
- To compare selective Left Bundle Branch Pacing (LBBP) with traditional cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure.
Materials and Methods:
Materials: The study will include patients who were hospitalized at the National Research Cardiac Surgery Center (NRCS) in Astana, Kazakhstan. The study will be a mixed-methods approach, consisting of a retrospective component and a prospective component. The retrospective part of the study will involve the analysis of clinical and functional data of patients with left bundle branch block and heart failure. The prospective part of the study will involve the evaluation of quantitative and qualitative parameters based on transthoracic echocardiography data, the functional status of patients after LBBP implantation, and the assessment of long-term outcomes of the study, including its impact on mortality, hospitalization rates, and overall prognosis.
Inclusion Criteria:
- patients with complete left bundle branch block, QRS duration greater than 150 ms, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) less than 35%, and New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class 2-3, who have been ineffective on optimal medical therapy for at least 3 months.
- patients aged 18 years or older.
- Signed informed consent and willingness to collaborate with the researchers.
Exclusion Criteria:
- patient refusal to participate in the study.
Control Group:
patients post-implantation of traditional CRT-D.
Methods:
- Electrocardiography (ECG).
- Transthoracic echocardiography (EchoCG).
- 6-minute walk test.
- NT-proBNP measurement.
- Questionnaire-based assessments: SF-36, EQ-5D-5L.
Scientific Novelty:
This method is distinguished by its ability to provide highly physiological synchronized myocardial stimulation by stimulating the anatomical area of the left bundle branch, offering advantages such as shortening the ventricular electrical systole.
Advantages of the Method:
- Shortens ventricular electrical systole.
- Expands the possibilities of cardiac pacing in heart failure patients, including those who cannot undergo traditional cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) due to anatomical constraints (vascular anatomy) or other factors.
- LBBP can be considered as an alternative resynchronization method for non-responders to traditional CRT.
Practical Significance:
The procedure is simpler (less technically complex), electrode fixation is easier, the procedure duration and fluoroscopy time are shorter, it has the ability to maintain and improve left ventricular synchrony, and a shorter learning curve. Inclusion Criteria
- Male or female ≥ 18 years of age at Visit 1.
- patients with complete left bundle branch block, QRS duration greater than 130 ms, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) less than 35%, and New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class 2-3, who have been ineffective on optimal medical therapy for at least 3 months.
- Written informed consent (and assent when applicable) obtained from subject or subject's legal representative and ability for subject to comply with the requirements of the study.
Exclusion Criteria
- Pregnancy.
- Psychic disturbances.
- Presence of a condition or abnormality that in the opinion of the Investigator would compromise the safety of the patient or the quality of the data - life expectancy less than 1 year.
Anticipated amount of patients - 50. STUDY TREATMENTS AND INTERVENTIONS day 1 - admission to cardiology department, acquisition of medical history, physical examination, blood tests, ECG, transthoracic echoCG.
day 2 - additional examinations (if necessary, depend on comorbidity), preparing for interventional procedure.
day 3 - implantation of cardiac resynchronization therapy device using Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP).
Procedure description:
LBBAP procedure was performed as previously described by Huang in 2017 and Ponnusamy in 2022. Monitoring of 12-lead ECG and intracardiac electrograms were performed utilizing WorkMate Claris electrophysiology system (Abbott, Plymouth, MN). DF-1 Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) lead was placed into the right ventricle (RV) apex in all patients. LBBAP was performed using two types of leads and delivery catheters: C315HIS sheath with 3830 SelectSecure lead (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN), and Selectra 3D with Solia S60 lead (Biotronik, Berlin, Germany). Left conduction system capture was confirmed in appliance with European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) clinical consensus statement on conduction system pacing implantation [10]. Main criteria to accept LBB area capture were: presence of terminal R-wave in lead V1; transition in QRS morphology from non-selective to selective during threshold test; short and stable V6 R-wave peak time (V6RWPT)<80 ms in different pacing outputs; V6-V1 interpeak>33 ms; sudden increase in V1 R-wave peak time (V1RWPT)>10 ms, split of EGM during threshold test.
day 4 - chest X-ray, device pocket ultrasound, device interrogation with lead testing, ECG.
day 5 - discharge from the hospital.
A Schedule of Events representing the required testing procedures to be performed for the duration of the study is diagrammed in Appendix 1.
Prior to conducting any study-related activities, written informed consent must be signed and dated by the subject or subject's legal representative. If appropriate, assent must also be obtained prior to conducting any study-related activities.
EVALUATIONS BY VISIT Visit 1 (admission to the hospital)
- Review the study with the subject (subject's legal representative) and obtain written informed consent.
- Assign the subject a unique screening number.
- Record demographics data.
- Record medical history, including a history of congestive heart failure, diagnosis date, and prior treatments.
- Record concomitant medications.
- Perform a complete physical examination.
- Perform and record vital signs.
- Perform and record oximetry.
- Perform and record results of blood pressure testing.
- Collect blood for clinical laboratory tests (chemistry, hematology, prothrombin time, NTPROBNP).
- Obtain an echocardiogram, ECG.
- Obtain a chest x-ray.
- Implantation of device
- Chest X-ray, ECG and device telemetry at 1 day after procedure
- Discharge from the hospital and schedule subject for Visit 2 in 3 months. Visit 2 (3 months after discharge)
- Record any Adverse Experiences and/or Review subject diary for adverse experiences 2. Perform abbreviated physical examination. 3. Perform and record vital signs. 4. Obtain an echocardiogram, ECG, chest X-ray. 5. NTproBNP test 6. ^ minute walk test (6MWT) 7. Questionnaire-based assessments: SF-36, EQ-5D-5L. 8. Device telemetry. Visit 3 (6 months after discharge)
- Record any Adverse Experiences and/or Review subject diary for adverse experiences
- Perform abbreviated physical examination.
- Perform and record vital signs.
- Obtain an echocardiogram, ECG, chest X-ray.
- NTproBNP test
- 6MWT
- Questionnaire-based assessments: SF-36, EQ-5D-5L.
- Device telemetry. Visit 4 (12 months after discharge)
- Record any Adverse Experiences and/or Review subject diary for adverse experiences 2. Perform abbreviated physical examination. 3. Perform and record vital signs. 4. Obtain an echocardiogram, ECG, chest X-ray. 5. NTproBNP test 6. 6MWT 7. Questionnaire-based assessments: SF-36, EQ-5D-5L. 8. Device telemetry.
STATISTICAL METHODS AND CONSIDERATIONS This will be a non-randomized, prospective, single-centre, observational study. Participant characteristics and sequencing results will be summarized with descriptive statistics, including medians, averages, and standard deviations for continuous data. For categorical data, proportions with a 95% confidence interval will be calculated by the Klopper-Pearson method. Demographic, clinical and pathological characteristics will be compared using the criterion χ2 (categorical variables) and t-test/analysis of variance (continuous variables).Values of p<0.05 will be considered significant.
DATA COLLECTION, RETENTION AND MONITORING Data Collection Instruments The Investigator will prepare and maintain adequate and accurate source documents designed to record all observations and other pertinent data for each subject treated with the study drug.
Study personnel will enter data from source documents corresponding to a subject's visit into the protocol-specific electronic Case Report Form (eCRF) and paper CRF when the information corresponding to that visit is available. Subjects will not be identified by name in the study database but will be identified by a site number, subject number and initials.
For eCRFs: If a correction is required for an eCRF, the time and date stamps track the person entering or updating eCRF data and creates an electronic audit trail. For paper CRFs: If a correction is made on a CRF, the study staff member will line through the incorrect data, write in the correct data and initial and date the change.
The Investigator is responsible for all information collected on subjects enrolled in this study. All data collected during the course of this study must be reviewed and verified for completeness and accuracy by the Investigator. A copy of the CRF will remain at the Investigator's site at the completion of the study.
- Conditions
- Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction, Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing, Heart Failure, Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy, Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices, Conduction System Pacing
- Being tested
- left bundle branch area pacing
- Keywords
- heart failure, left bundle branch block, left bundle branch area pacing, medtronic, cardiac resynchronization therapy, kazakhstan
- Medical subject headings
- Heart Failure, Bundle-Branch Block
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
left bundle branch area pacingDevice
Cardiac resynchronization therapy obtained by conduction system pacing
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| patients with heart failure and left bundle branch block | Other | 1. Male or female ≥ 18 years of age at Visit 1.
2. Patients with complete left bundle branch block, QRS duration greater than 130 ms, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) less than 35%, and New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class 2-3, who have been ineffective on optimal medical therapy for at least 3 months.
3. Written informed consent (and assent when applicable) obtained from subject or subject's legal representative and ability for subject to comply with the requirements of the study. Receives: Device: left bundle branch area pacing |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
General complications related to implantable cardiac device
Incidence and amount of participants with general complication (deaths, stroke, thromboembolic complications);
Measured: From enrollment to the end of follow-up period at 12 months
procedure-related complications related to implantable cardiac device
Incidence and amount of participants with procedure-related complication (pneumothorax, pocket/wound infection, systemic infection, pocket hematoma, atrial lead dislodgement, pericardial effusion, large vein thrombosis, re-intervention for other non-LBBAP lead reasons, subclavian arteriovenous fistula after puncture)
Measured: From enrollment to the end of follow-up period at 12 months
LBBAP lead-related complications complications related to implantable cardiac device
Incidence and amount of patients with LBBAP lead-related complications (intraprocedural perforation into the left ventricle (LV) cavity , delayed perforation into the LV cavity, acute chest pain, acute ST-segment elevation in multiple leads, acute coronary syndrome, coronary vein fistula, coronary artery fistula, painful pacing/chest pain, right bundle branch injury, LBBAP lead unscrewable/trapped/damaged helix, LBBAP lead dislodgement, threshold rise to an absolute value > 2 V, threshold rise > 1 V from baseline, threshold rise leading to re-intervention)
Measured: From enrollment to the end of follow-up period at 12 months
shortening of QRS
Efficacy will be evaluated by shortening of QRS duration on ECG.
Measured: From enrollment to the end of follow-up period at 12 months
Improvement of left ventricle ejection fraction
Efficacy will be evaluated by increasing of left ventricle ejection fraction, measured by transthoracic echocardiography in 4 chamber apical position by Simpson's approach.
Measured: From enrollment to the end of follow-up period at 12 months
Decreasing of left ventricle end-diastolic diameter
Efficacy will be evaluated by decreasing of left ventricle end-diastolic diameter measured by transthoracic echocardiography in parasternal long axis.
Measured: From enrollment to the end of follow-up period at 12 months
Decreasing of left ventricle end-diastolic volume
Efficacy will be evaluated by decreasing of left ventricle end-diastolic volume measured by transthoracic echocardiography in apical 4-chamber position
Measured: From enrollment to the end of follow-up period at 12 months
Decreasing of left ventricle end-systolic volume
Efficacy will be evaluated by decreasing of left ventricle end-systolic volume measured by transthoracic echocardiography in apical 4-chamber position
Measured: From enrollment to the end of follow-up period at 12 months
Improvement of mitral regurgitation
Efficacy will be evaluated by decreasing of mitral regurgitation measured by transthoracic echocardiography in multiply positions
Measured: From enrollment to the end of follow-up period at 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Jul 2024
- Study start1 Jun 2024
- Primary completion1 Jun 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Jun 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection FractionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- National Research Center for Cardiac Surgery, Kazakhstan
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Yerlan Turubayev, MD, Principal investigator, doctor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06488989
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Protocol V1 (12.12.2023)
- Acronym
- LBBAPHF
- Status last verified
- Jul 2024
- First submitted
- 25 Jun 2024
- Last updated
- 5 Jul 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Tan JL, Lee JZ, Terrigno V, Saracco B, Saxena S, Krathen J, Hunter K, Cha YM, Russo AM. Outcomes of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. CJC Open. 2021 Jun 16;3(10):1282-1293. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2021.05.019. eCollection 2021 Oct.
PubMed 34888508Goldenberg I, Kutyifa V, Klein HU, Cannom DS, Brown MW, Dan A, Daubert JP, Estes NA 3rd, Foster E, Greenberg H, Kautzner J, Klempfner R, Kuniss M, Merkely B, Pfeffer MA, Quesada A, Viskin S, McNitt S, Polonsky B, Ghanem A, Solomon SD, Wilber D, Zareba W, Moss AJ. Survival with cardiac-resynchronization therapy in mild heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2014 May 1;370(18):1694-701. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1401426. Epub 2014 Mar 30.
PubMed 24678999Yu CM, Lin H, Fung WH, Zhang Q, Kong SL, Sanderson JE. Comparison of acute changes in left ventricular volume, systolic and diastolic functions, and intraventricular synchronicity after biventricular and right ventricular pacing for heart failure. Am Heart J. 2003 May;145(5):E18. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8703(03)00071-1.
PubMed 12766742
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Jul 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Patients With Heart Failure
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06488989
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- LBBAPHF / Protocol V1 (12.12.2023)
- Conditions
- Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction, Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing, Heart Failure, Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy, Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices, Conduction System Pacing
- Keywords
- heart failure, left bundle branch block, left bundle branch area pacing, medtronic, cardiac resynchronization therapy, kazakhstan
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- National Research Center for Cardiac Surgery, KazakhstanUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jun 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jun 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Jun 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 5 Jul 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The relevance of Left Bundle Branch Pacing (LBBP) lies in its potential as a promising treatment option for patients with heart failure and left bundle branch block. LBBP aims to restore the normal physiological activation of the heart by delivering electrical impulses to the anatomical area of the left bundle branch, which may lead to more effective and synchronized ventricular contractions. Compared to traditional cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), this can result in a more physiological correction of dyssynchrony, improvement in left ventricular pump function, reduction in left ventricular volumes, and a decrease in mitral regurgitation. A crucial criterion is the reduction of heart failure symptoms and the enhancement of the patients quality of life.
Detailed description
The aim The aim of Left Bundle Branch Pacing (LBBP) research is to assess its effectiveness in improving the contractile capacity of the left ventricular myocardium. The objectives are as follows
- To determine the optimal patient selection criteria;
- To assess long-term outcomes;
- To investigate safety and complications;
- To compare selective Left Bundle Branch Pacing (LBBP) with traditional cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure.
Materials and Methods:
Materials: The study will include patients who were hospitalized at the National Research Cardiac Surgery Center (NRCS) in Astana, Kazakhstan. The study will be a mixed-methods approach, consisting of a retrospective component and a prospective component. The retrospective part of the study will involve the analysis of clinical and functional data of patients with left bundle branch block and heart failure. The prospective part of the study will involve the evaluation of quantitative and qualitative parameters based on transthoracic echocardiography data, the functional status of patients after LBBP implantation, and the assessment of long-term outcomes of the study, including its impact on mortality, hospitalization rates, and overall prognosis.
Inclusion Criteria:
- patients with complete left bundle branch block, QRS duration greater than 150 ms, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) less than 35%, and New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class 2-3, who have been ineffective on optimal medical therapy for at least 3 months.
- patients aged 18 years or older.
- Signed informed consent and willingness to collaborate with the researchers.
Exclusion Criteria:
- patient refusal to participate in the study.
Control Group:
patients post-implantation of traditional CRT-D.
Methods:
- Electrocardiography (ECG).
- Transthoracic echocardiography (EchoCG).
- 6-minute walk test.
- NT-proBNP measurement.
- Questionnaire-based assessments: SF-36, EQ-5D-5L.
Scientific Novelty:
This method is distinguished by its ability to provide highly physiological synchronized myocardial stimulation by stimulating the anatomical area of the left bundle branch, offering advantages such as shortening the ventricular electrical systole.
Advantages of the Method:
- Shortens ventricular electrical systole.
- Expands the possibilities of cardiac pacing in heart failure patients, including those who cannot undergo traditional cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) due to anatomical constraints (vascular anatomy) or other factors.
- LBBP can be considered as an alternative resynchronization method for non-responders to traditional CRT.
Practical Significance:
The procedure is simpler (less technically complex), electrode fixation is easier, the procedure duration and fluoroscopy time are shorter, it has the ability to maintain and improve left ventricular synchrony, and a shorter learning curve. Inclusion Criteria
- Male or female ≥ 18 years of age at Visit 1.
- patients with complete left bundle branch block, QRS duration greater than 130 ms, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) less than 35%, and New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class 2-3, who have been ineffective on optimal medical therapy for at least 3 months.
- Written informed consent (and assent when applicable) obtained from subject or subject's legal representative and ability for subject to comply with the requirements of the study.
Exclusion Criteria
- Pregnancy.
- Psychic disturbances.
- Presence of a condition or abnormality that in the opinion of the Investigator would compromise the safety of the patient or the quality of the data - life expectancy less than 1 year.
Anticipated amount of patients - 50. STUDY TREATMENTS AND INTERVENTIONS day 1 - admission to cardiology department, acquisition of medical history, physical examination, blood tests, ECG, transthoracic echoCG.
day 2 - additional examinations (if necessary, depend on comorbidity), preparing for interventional procedure.
day 3 - implantation of cardiac resynchronization therapy device using Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP).
Procedure description:
LBBAP procedure was performed as previously described by Huang in 2017 and Ponnusamy in 2022. Monitoring of 12-lead ECG and intracardiac electrograms were performed utilizing WorkMate Claris electrophysiology system (Abbott, Plymouth, MN). DF-1 Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) lead was placed into the right ventricle (RV) apex in all patients. LBBAP was performed using two types of leads and delivery catheters: C315HIS sheath with 3830 SelectSecure lead (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN), and Selectra 3D with Solia S60 lead (Biotronik, Berlin, Germany). Left conduction system capture was confirmed in appliance with European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) clinical consensus statement on conduction system pacing implantation [10]. Main criteria to accept LBB area capture were: presence of terminal R-wave in lead V1; transition in QRS morphology from non-selective to selective during threshold test; short and stable V6 R-wave peak time (V6RWPT)<80 ms in different pacing outputs; V6-V1 interpeak>33 ms; sudden increase in V1 R-wave peak time (V1RWPT)>10 ms, split of EGM during threshold test.
day 4 - chest X-ray, device pocket ultrasound, device interrogation with lead testing, ECG.
day 5 - discharge from the hospital.
A Schedule of Events representing the required testing procedures to be performed for the duration of the study is diagrammed in Appendix 1.
Prior to conducting any study-related activities, written informed consent must be signed and dated by the subject or subject's legal representative. If appropriate, assent must also be obtained prior to conducting any study-related activities.
EVALUATIONS BY VISIT Visit 1 (admission to the hospital)
- Review the study with the subject (subject's legal representative) and obtain written informed consent.
- Assign the subject a unique screening number.
- Record demographics data.
- Record medical history, including a history of congestive heart failure, diagnosis date, and prior treatments.
- Record concomitant medications.
- Perform a complete physical examination.
- Perform and record vital signs.
- Perform and record oximetry.
- Perform and record results of blood pressure testing.
- Collect blood for clinical laboratory tests (chemistry, hematology, prothrombin time, NTPROBNP).
- Obtain an echocardiogram, ECG.
- Obtain a chest x-ray.
- Implantation of device
- Chest X-ray, ECG and device telemetry at 1 day after procedure
- Discharge from the hospital and schedule subject for Visit 2 in 3 months. Visit 2 (3 months after discharge)
- Record any Adverse Experiences and/or Review subject diary for adverse experiences 2. Perform abbreviated physical examination. 3. Perform and record vital signs. 4. Obtain an echocardiogram, ECG, chest X-ray. 5. NTproBNP test 6. ^ minute walk test (6MWT) 7. Questionnaire-based assessments: SF-36, EQ-5D-5L. 8. Device telemetry. Visit 3 (6 months after discharge)
- Record any Adverse Experiences and/or Review subject diary for adverse experiences
- Perform abbreviated physical examination.
- Perform and record vital signs.
- Obtain an echocardiogram, ECG, chest X-ray.
- NTproBNP test
- 6MWT
- Questionnaire-based assessments: SF-36, EQ-5D-5L.
- Device telemetry. Visit 4 (12 months after discharge)
- Record any Adverse Experiences and/or Review subject diary for adverse experiences 2. Perform abbreviated physical examination. 3. Perform and record vital signs. 4. Obtain an echocardiogram, ECG, chest X-ray. 5. NTproBNP test 6. 6MWT 7. Questionnaire-based assessments: SF-36, EQ-5D-5L. 8. Device telemetry.
STATISTICAL METHODS AND CONSIDERATIONS This will be a non-randomized, prospective, single-centre, observational study. Participant characteristics and sequencing results will be summarized with descriptive statistics, including medians, averages, and standard deviations for continuous data. For categorical data, proportions with a 95% confidence interval will be calculated by the Klopper-Pearson method. Demographic, clinical and pathological characteristics will be compared using the criterion χ2 (categorical variables) and t-test/analysis of variance (continuous variables).Values of p<0.05 will be considered significant.
DATA COLLECTION, RETENTION AND MONITORING Data Collection Instruments The Investigator will prepare and maintain adequate and accurate source documents designed to record all observations and other pertinent data for each subject treated with the study drug.
Study personnel will enter data from source documents corresponding to a subject's visit into the protocol-specific electronic Case Report Form (eCRF) and paper CRF when the information corresponding to that visit is available. Subjects will not be identified by name in the study database but will be identified by a site number, subject number and initials.
For eCRFs: If a correction is required for an eCRF, the time and date stamps track the person entering or updating eCRF data and creates an electronic audit trail. For paper CRFs: If a correction is made on a CRF, the study staff member will line through the incorrect data, write in the correct data and initial and date the change.
The Investigator is responsible for all information collected on subjects enrolled in this study. All data collected during the course of this study must be reviewed and verified for completeness and accuracy by the Investigator. A copy of the CRF will remain at the Investigator's site at the completion of the study.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| patients with heart failure and left bundle branch block | Other | Device: left bundle branch area pacing1. Male or female ≥ 18 years of age at Visit 1. 2. Patients with complete left bundle branch block, QRS duration greater than 130 ms, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) less than 35%, and New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class 2-3, who have been ineffective on optimal medical therapy for at least 3 months. 3. Written informed consent (and assent when applicable) obtained from subject or subject's legal representative and ability for subject to comply with the requirements of the study. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Male or female ≥ 18 years of age at Visit 1.
- Patients with complete left bundle branch block, QRS duration greater than 130 ms, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) less than 35%, and New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class 2-3, who have been ineffective on optimal medical therapy for at least 3 months.
- Written informed consent (and assent when applicable) obtained from subject or subject's legal representative and ability for subject to comply with the requirements of the study.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Pregnancy.
- Psychic disturbances.
- Presence of a condition or abnormality that in the opinion of the Investigator would compromise the safety of the patient or the quality of the data - life expectancy less than 1 year.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| left bundle branch area pacingCardiac resynchronization therapy obtained by conduction system pacing | Device | patients with heart failure and left bundle branch block |
Primary outcome
General complications related to implantable cardiac device
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of follow-up period at 12 months
Incidence and amount of participants with general complication (deaths, stroke, thromboembolic complications);
procedure-related complications related to implantable cardiac device
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of follow-up period at 12 months
Incidence and amount of participants with procedure-related complication (pneumothorax, pocket/wound infection, systemic infection, pocket hematoma, atrial lead dislodgement, pericardial effusion, large vein thrombosis, re-intervention for other non-LBBAP lead reasons, subclavian arteriovenous fistula after puncture)
LBBAP lead-related complications complications related to implantable cardiac device
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of follow-up period at 12 months
Incidence and amount of patients with LBBAP lead-related complications (intraprocedural perforation into the left ventricle (LV) cavity , delayed perforation into the LV cavity, acute chest pain, acute ST-segment elevation in multiple leads, acute coronary syndrome, coronary vein fistula, coronary artery fistula, painful pacing/chest pain, right bundle branch injury, LBBAP lead unscrewable/trapped/damaged helix, LBBAP lead dislodgement, threshold rise to an absolute value > 2 V, threshold rise > 1 V from baseline, threshold rise leading to re-intervention)
shortening of QRS
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of follow-up period at 12 months
Efficacy will be evaluated by shortening of QRS duration on ECG.
Improvement of left ventricle ejection fraction
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of follow-up period at 12 months
Efficacy will be evaluated by increasing of left ventricle ejection fraction, measured by transthoracic echocardiography in 4 chamber apical position by Simpson's approach.
Decreasing of left ventricle end-diastolic diameter
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of follow-up period at 12 months
Efficacy will be evaluated by decreasing of left ventricle end-diastolic diameter measured by transthoracic echocardiography in parasternal long axis.
Decreasing of left ventricle end-diastolic volume
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of follow-up period at 12 months
Efficacy will be evaluated by decreasing of left ventricle end-diastolic volume measured by transthoracic echocardiography in apical 4-chamber position
Decreasing of left ventricle end-systolic volume
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of follow-up period at 12 months
Efficacy will be evaluated by decreasing of left ventricle end-systolic volume measured by transthoracic echocardiography in apical 4-chamber position
Improvement of mitral regurgitation
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of follow-up period at 12 months
Efficacy will be evaluated by decreasing of mitral regurgitation measured by transthoracic echocardiography in multiply positions
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Jul 2024.
- Background: PubMed 34888508Tan JL, Lee JZ, Terrigno V, Saracco B, Saxena S, Krathen J, Hunter K, Cha YM, Russo AM. Outcomes of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. CJC Open. 2021 Jun 16;3(10):1282-1293. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2021.05.019. eCollection 2021 Oct.
- Background: PubMed 24678999Goldenberg I, Kutyifa V, Klein HU, Cannom DS, Brown MW, Dan A, Daubert JP, Estes NA 3rd, Foster E, Greenberg H, Kautzner J, Klempfner R, Kuniss M, Merkely B, Pfeffer MA, Quesada A, Viskin S, McNitt S, Polonsky B, Ghanem A, Solomon SD, Wilber D, Zareba W, Moss AJ. Survival with cardiac-resynchronization therapy in mild heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2014 May 1;370(18):1694-701. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1401426. Epub 2014 Mar 30.
- Background: PubMed 12766742Yu CM, Lin H, Fung WH, Zhang Q, Kong SL, Sanderson JE. Comparison of acute changes in left ventricular volume, systolic and diastolic functions, and intraventricular synchronicity after biventricular and right ventricular pacing for heart failure. Am Heart J. 2003 May;145(5):E18. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8703(03)00071-1.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction
RecruitingPhase 4
SHengXIaN-QuYu DEcoction in Heart Failure With Reduced and Mildly Reduced Ejection Fraction
Heart Failure
RecruitingObservational study
Descriptive Study of Circulating Gene or Protein Inflammatory Biomarkers and Bioimpedance Parameters in a Population of Patients Hospitalized for Decompensated Heart Failure With Preserved or Mildly Reduced Cardiac Function
Inflammation Biomarkers, Heart Failure
RecruitingPhase 3
Study With Omecamtiv Mecarbil (CK-1827452) to Treat Chronic Heart Failure With Severely Reduced Ejection Fraction
Heart Failure, Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction
Active, not recruiting
REsynchronization Comparison In LBBB and Normal or Mildly Reduced VENTricular Function With CRT (REINVENT-CRT)
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction, Heart Failure (HF)
Recruiting
Achieving Optimal Medical Therapy Through Percutaneous Treatment of Secondary Mitral Regurgitation to Improve Outcome in Patients With HFrEF
Mitral Regurgitation Functional, Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Yerlan Turubayev, MD principal investigator
doctor
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing left bundle branch area pacing in people with Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction and Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing, run by National Research Center for Cardiac Surgery, Kazakhstan at 1 site in Kazakhstan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Jul 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Kazakhstan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
General complications related to implantable cardiac device (time frame: From enrollment to the end of follow-up period at 12 months). The study lists 9 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06488989, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Jul 2024.