AzTrials
AzTrials

Anesthesia ComplicationNCT06498076

Management of Postspinal Anesthesia Hypotension During Elective Cesarean Section: Baby Norepinephrine Versus Ephedrine

A study testing Norepinephrine and Ephedrine in people with Anesthesia Complication and Vasopressor, run by Hopital Charles Nicolle at 1 site in Tunisia.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Background : Spinal anesthesia emerges as the preferred anesthesia technique for elective cesarean section . It offers a preferable alternative to general anesthesia because it provides better maternal safety and neonatal outcomes. However, spinal anesthesia is not free of inherent risks. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 38 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Norepinephrine and Ephedrine
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
196 participants
Where
1 siteTunisia
Study dates
1 Aug 2024to 25 Jan 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 38 years
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Singleton full-term consenting pregnant females of ASA grade II, aged 18-38 years, scheduled for elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia

Who cannot join

  • Any parturient falling in the category ASA grade III and IV, contrindications to spinal anesthesia, preeclampsia, chronic hypertension, comorbidity with diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disorders and psychiatric illness are non included.
  • They are excluded the case of failure of spinal anesthesia, conversion to general anesthesia, post-partum bleeding, and failure to follow protocol.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Tunisia1 site
  • Charles Nicolle Hospital

    Tunis, Tunis Governorate, 1006

Other trials in Tunisia

About this study

Background : Spinal anesthesia emerges as the preferred anesthesia technique for elective cesarean section . It offers a preferable alternative to general anesthesia because it provides better maternal safety and neonatal outcomes. However, spinal anesthesia is not free of inherent risks. Hypotension remains the most common complication which threats both mother and child. The common method of treating hypotension includes fluid loading and the use of vasopressors such as ephedrine and phenylephrine. One promising approach is the administration of diluted norepinephrine. It presents a good alternative to preserve maternal blood pressure while minimizing adverse effects on the mother and fetus. Thus, our study proposes to evaluate the efficacy and safety of diluted norepinephrine boluses compared with ephedrine on the management of post- spinal anesthesia hypotension during scheduled cesarean sections.

Patients and methods : After local Ethical Commitee approval, this prospective randomized double -blind study will be undertaken from August to October 2024 in the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive care and Gynecology and Obstetric department of Charles Nicolle Hospital of Tunis. After obtaining informed written consent, singleton full-term pregnant females of ASA grade II, aged 18-38 years, scheduled for elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia will be randomly divided into two groups. Group N : patients receive norepinephrine boluses (8 µg) ; prophylactic bolus immediately after spinal anesthesia induction and therapeutic boluses when systolic blood pressure falls to ≤ 20% of baseline. Group E : parturients receive ephedrine boluses (6 mg) ; systematic bolus after the induction of spinal anesthesia and therapeutic boluses if hypotension. Heart rate, systolic, diastolic and mean blood pressure are monitored. Number of episodes of hypotension and number of vasopressor boluses used in each group are recorded and considered as the primary outcomes of the study. Complication during the surgery as incidence of hypertension, tachycardia, bradycardia, nausea and vomiting are recorded. We also record neonatal APGAR score at 1 minute and five minutes. These parameters are considered as the secondary outcomes of the study.

Read more

Statistical study:

Data entry and analysis will be performed by SPSS software version 25.0. We will use Excel 2019 software to edit the charts. Continuous quantitative variables following a normal distribution will be expressed by their means and standard deviation. Categorical variables will be expressed as frequencies and percentages. Analytical study: We'll use the Pearson chi2 test or Fischer's exact test, whichever appropriate, for the comparison of categorical variables. T test of Student and Mann Whitney U-test will be employed for comparing Continuous variables. We 'll retain a significance threshold for p less than 5%.

Read the detailed description

Background : Spinal anesthesia emerges as the preferred anesthesia technique for elective cesarean section . It offers a preferable alternative to general anesthesia because it provides better maternal safety and neonatal outcomes. However, spinal anesthesia is not free of inherent risks. Among the feared complications, hypotension remains the most common complication which threats both mother and child. In this perspective, several preventive and curative means have been studied to optimize maternal and fetal homeostasis. The common methods include fluid loading and the use of vasopressors such as ephedrine and phenylephrine. One promising approach is the administration of diluted norepinephrine. Due to its low agonist activity of the ß receptor and its powerful α adrenergic agonist activity, it presents a good alternative to preserve maternal blood pressure while minimizing adverse effects on the mother and fetus. Thus, our study proposes to evaluate the efficacy and safety of diluted norepinephrine boluses compared with ephedrine on the management of post- spinal anesthesia hypotension during scheduled cesarean sections.

Patients and methods : After approval from the Local Ethical Commitee of the Hospital (N° FWA 00032748) , and after obtaining informed written consent this prospective randomized double -blind study will be undertaken from August to October 2024 in the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive care and Gynecology and Obstetric department of Charles Nicolle Hospital of Tunis.

Inclusion criteria : Singleton full-term consenting pregnant females of ASA grade II, aged 18-38 years, scheduled for elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia are included in the study.

Non inclusion criteria : Any parturient falling in the category ASA grade III and IV, contraindications to spinal anesthesia, preeclampsia, chronic hypertension, comorbidity with diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disorders and psychiatric illness are non included.

Exclusion criteria : They are excluded the case of failure of spinal anesthesia, conversion to general anesthesia, post-partum bleeding, and failure to follow protocol.

Patient groups :

Sample size : It was calculated by (https://statulator.com/SampleSize/ss2M.html), by adjusting a power of 80%, confidence level of 95%, and margin of error of 5%. The primary outcome variable of our study is to compare the number of vasopressor boluses to maintain mean blood pressure ≥ 80% between the groupes, which was estimated from the study conducted by Elnabtity and Selim. The least number of patients required in each groupe with a standard deviation of 2 is 63.

A total of 126 parturients are randomly divided into two equal groups by an investigator not directly linked to the study.

Group N : patients will received norepinephrine boluses (8 µg) ; prophylactic bolus immediately after spinal anesthesia induction and therapeutic boluses when systolic blood pressure falls to ≤ 20% of baseline. Group E : parturients will received ephedrine boluses (6 mg) ; systematic bolus after the induction of spinal anesthesia and therapeutic boluses if hypotension.

The syringes will be labeled as syringe A and syringe B and the anesthesiologist who will give the bolus cannot know if it is ephedrine or norepinephrine.

The preparation of diluted norepinephrine is done by two dilutions: first dilution: 1ml of norepinephrine 2 mg/ml is diluted to 50 ml with 0.9% normal saline to have a concentration of 40 µg/ml. The second dilution: 1ml of norepinephrine 40µg/ml is diluted to 10 ml with 0.9% normal saline in 10 ml syringe prepared as final concentration of 4 µg/ml.

Ephedrine is prepared in 10 ml syringe at a concentration of 3 mg/ml. Preoperative period : A preanesthesia consultation is performed for patients included in the protocol. The modalities of the young preoperative, the anesthetic technique, the protocol of the study are explained to the parturients. Written and signed informed consent by the patients included in the study is obtained.

Intraoperative setting : On arrival to the operating room after a Check list, The parturient is positioned on the operating table in the supine position with left uterine displacement. We use a standard monitoring including non invasive blood pressure (NIBP), pulse oxymeter (SpO2) and electrocardiogram (ECG). We record three values of systolic, diastolic, and mean blood pressure and heart rate before any patient stimulation. An intravenous canula 18 G is inserted and antibiotic prophylaxis is administered 30 minutes before surgical incision using 2 g of cefazolin or 900 mg of clindamycin in case of allergy to penicillins.

Induction of spinal anesthesia: Co fluid loading 10 ml /kg of crystalloids is commenced. In the sitting position, under all aseptic precautions, introduction of spinal needle 25 gauge at L3-L4 or L4-L5 vertebral interspace. After obtaining free flow of cerebrospinal fluid, a standard mixture of anesthetic product : 10 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% (08 mg if parturient's size ≤ 160 cm) with 2.5 µg of sufentanil and morphine 0.1 mg is injected. After intrathecal injection, parturients take quickly their initial position and the first prophylactic bolus of the vasopressor (2 ml) from syringe A or syringe B is administerated. Oxygen is administred by ventimask at rate of 3 l/min till the delivery of the baby. The level of sensory block is evaluated by pin prick test. Successful sensory block is defined as block reaching T4 dermatomal level. If after 20 minutes the sensory block level remains < T10, a conversion to general anesthesia is performed and the patient is excluded from the study.

Heart rate, systolic, diastolic and mean blood pressure are recorded every minute for the first 15 minutes after spinal anesthesia and every five minutes until the end of the intervention.

Management of hypotension : When systolic blood pressure (SBP) decreases to ≤ 20% of baseline, a rescue bolus of vasopressor (2 ml of syringe A or syringe B) is given. Reinjection of the same bolus is repeated after 1 minute if hypotension persists. Administration of boluses is stopped when the value of the SBP finds ≥ 80% of the baseline.

After clamping of the umbilical cord, Oxytocin is given as an initial bolus of 10 UI over 3 minutes followed by slow infusion of 15 UI in 0.9% normal saline. Neonatal APGAR score at 1 minute and five minutes is recorded.

Primary outcome : Number of vasopressor boluses used in each group to treat hypotension (SBP decreases to ≤ 20% of baseline) is recorded.

Secondary outcomes : Complication during the surgery as incidence of hypertension (SBP ≥ 20% of baseline), tachycardia (Heart rate ; HR ≥ 120 beats/min), bradycardia (HR ≤ 60 beats/min), nausea and vomiting are recorded. We'll also recorded neonatal APGAR score of the first and 5th minute.

Statistical study:

Data entry and analysis will be performed by SPSS version 25.0 software We will use Excel 2019 software to edit the charts. Descriptive study: Continuous quantitative variables following a normal distribution will be expressed by their means and standard deviation. Continuous quantitative variables not following a normal law will be expressed by their median and interquartile [25%-75%]. Qualitative variables will be expressed as simple frequencies (n) and relative frequencies as a percentage. Analytical study: For the analysis of the association between two qualitative variables, we will use the Pearson chi-2 test for the comparison of two frequencies under verified application conditions and the Fischer test otherwise. For the analysis of the association between a qualitative variable and a quantitative variable, we 'll use the T test of Student for the comparison of two means and the non-parametric test of Mann Whitney otherwise. We 'll retain a significance threshold for p 5%. In the multivariate study, risk will be calculated by the Odds Ratio (OR) with a retained confidence interval of 95% (95% CI).

Being tested
Norepinephrine, Ephedrine
Keywords
spinal anesthesia, cesarean section, complications, hypotension, ephedrine, norepinehrine
Medical subject headings
Hypotension

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • NorepinephrineDrug

    Also called Group N

    injection of prophylactic norepinephrinebolus after spinal anesthesia induction. If hypotension at any time during surgery, administration of rescue bolus of the same vasopressor to each patient.

  • EphedrineDrug

    Also called Group E

    injection of prophylactic ephedrine If hypotension at any time during surgery, administration of rescue bolus of the same vasopressor to each patient.

Study groups in NCT06498076
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group E: ephedrineActive comparatorGroup E : parturients will received ephedrine boluses (6 mg) ; systematic bolus after the induction of spinal anesthesia and therapeutic boluses if hypotention (systolic blood pressure falls to ≤ 20% of baseline).
Receives: Drug: Ephedrine
Group N: norepinephrineActive comparatorGroup N : patients will received norepinephrine boluses (8 µg) ; prophylactic bolus immediately after spinal anesthesia induction and therapeutic boluses when systolic blood pressure falls to ≤ 20% of baseline
Receives: Drug: Norepinephrine

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. number of boluses of vasopressor during surgery

    number of boluses of norepinephrine in Group N and number of boluses of ephedrine in Group E, to maintain systolic blood pressure more than 80% of the baseline

    Measured: number of boluses in the first hour after spinal anesthesia

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Incidence of hypertension

    Hypertension is defined as systolic blood pressure ≥ 20% of baseline

    Measured: number of hypertension in the first hour after spinal anesthesia

  2. Incidence of tachycardia

    tachycardia : Heart Rate ≥ 120 beats/min

    Measured: number of tachycardia in the first hour after spinal anesthesia

  3. Incidence of bradycardia

    bradycardia : Heart Rate ≤ 60 beats/min)

    Measured: number of bradycardia in the first hour after spinal anesthesia

  4. Incidence of nausea and vomiting

    Nausea vomiting is recorded in each group

    Measured: the first hour after spinal anesthesia

  5. Neonatal APGAR score

    Neonatal APGAR score is recorded at 1 minute and five minutes

    Measured: the first hour

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Jul 2024
  2. Study start1 Aug 2024
  3. Primary completion10 Jan 2025
  4. Study completion25 Jan 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Groupe N : parturients are received norepinephrine boluses (8 µg) ; prophylactic bolus immediately after spinal anesthesia induction and therapeutic boluses when systolic blood pressure falls to ≤ 20% of baseline. Groupe E : parturients are received ephedrine boluses (6 mg) ; systematic bolus after the induction of spinal anesthesia and therapeutic boluses if hypotention.
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
196 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06498076
Sponsor's protocol ID
HCharlesNicolle
Status last verified
Apr 2026
First submitted
13 Jun 2024
Last updated
23 Apr 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Mancuso A, De Vivo A, Giacobbe A, Priola V, Maggio Savasta L, Guzzo M, De Vivo D, Mancuso A. General versus spinal anaesthesia for elective caesarean sections: effects on neonatal short-term outcome. A prospective randomised study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010 Oct;23(10):1114-8. doi: 10.3109/14767050903572158.

    PubMed 20088721
  • Sklebar I, Bujas T, Habek D. SPINAL ANAESTHESIA-INDUCED HYPOTENSION IN OBSTETRICS: PREVENTION AND THERAPY. Acta Clin Croat. 2019 Jun;58(Suppl 1):90-95. doi: 10.20471/acc.2019.58.s1.13.

    PubMed 31741565
  • Mercier FJ, Bonnet MP, De la Dorie A, Moufouki M, Banu F, Hanaf A, Edouard D, Roger-Christoph S. [Spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: fluid loading, vasopressors and hypotension]. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2007 Jul-Aug;26(7-8):688-93. doi: 10.1016/j.annfar.2007.05.003. Epub 2007 Jun 27. French.

    PubMed 17590565
  • Ngan Kee WD, Khaw KS. Vasopressors in obstetrics: what should we be using? Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2006 Jun;19(3):238-43. doi: 10.1097/01.aco.0000192816.22989.ba.

    PubMed 16735804
  • Heesen M, Stewart A, Fernando R. Vasopressors for the treatment of maternal hypotension following spinal anaesthesia for elective caesarean section: past, present and future. Anaesthesia. 2015 Mar;70(3):252-7. doi: 10.1111/anae.13007. Epub 2015 Jan 13. No abstract available.

    PubMed 25583307
  • Mohta M, Dubey M, Malhotra RK, Tyagi A. Comparison of the potency of phenylephrine and norepinephrine bolus doses used to treat post-spinal hypotension during elective caesarean section. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2019 May;38:25-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2018.12.002. Epub 2018 Dec 13.

    PubMed 30685301
  • Ali Elnabtity AM, Selim MF. Norepinephrine versus Ephedrine to Maintain Arterial Blood Pressure during Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery: A Prospective Double-blinded Trial. Anesth Essays Res. 2018 Jan-Mar;12(1):92-97. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_204_17.

    PubMed 29628561
  • Reynolds F, Seed PT. Anaesthesia for Caesarean section and neonatal acid-base status: a meta-analysis. Anaesthesia. 2005 Jul;60(7):636-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2005.04223.x.

    PubMed 15960713

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Norepinephrine and Ephedrine in people with Anesthesia Complication and Vasopressor, run by Hopital Charles Nicolle at 1 site in Tunisia.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Tunisia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

number of boluses of vasopressor during surgery (time frame: number of boluses in the first hour after spinal anesthesia). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06498076, which also lists 8 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Apr 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in