Neurologic ManifestationsNCT06512636
A Decade-Long Dance With Diplopia: Unraveling the Enigma of Recurrent 6th Nerve Palsy
An observational study of Neurologic Manifestations, run by College of Medical Sciences, Bharatpur at 1 site in Nepal.
Trial summary
Abstract: Introduction and Importance: Recurrent diplopia poses a diagnostic challenge, necessitating a thorough evaluation to elucidate its underlying etiology and guide its management. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Neurologic Manifestations
- How many people
- 1 participants
- Where
- 1 siteNepal
- Study dates
- 15 Jan 2024to 15 Jun 2024
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: This is a case report of a 39 year old male.
Who may be able to join
- This is only a case report of 39-years-old male.
Who cannot join
- -
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Abstract:
Introduction and Importance:
Read more
Recurrent diplopia poses a diagnostic challenge, necessitating a thorough evaluation to elucidate its underlying etiology and guide its management. We present the case of a 39-year-old farmer with recurrent 6th nerve palsy for over a decade, highlighting the complexity and persistence of this condition.
Case Presentation:
A 39-year-old farmer presented with recurrent diplopia attributed to 6th nerve palsy, with eight episodes over 14 years. Despite systemic steroid treatment, the symptoms recurred every 12-18 months. Clinical examination revealed right eye abduction impairment;-, no other abnormalities were detected. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) indicated rhinosinusitis, and the results of the autoimmune antibody test were negative.
Clinical Discussion:
This case challenges conventional diagnostic approaches, underscoring the need for a comprehensive evaluation and tailored management strategies. Despite extensive investigations, the etiology remains elusive, emphasizing the complexity of recurrent diplopia.
Conclusion:
Continued monitoring and further investigation are warranted to unravel the enigma of recurrent diplopia in this unique case, highlighting the importance of individualized approaches to guide optimal management.
Read the detailed description
A Decade-Long Dance with Diplopia: Unraveling the Enigma of Recurrent 6th Nerve Palsy
ABSTRACT
Introduction and Importance:
Recurrent diplopia poses a diagnostic challenge, necessitating a thorough evaluation to elucidate its underlying etiology and guide its management. We present the case of a 39-year-old farmer with recurrent 6th nerve palsy for over a decade, highlighting the complexity and persistence of this condition.
Case Presentation:
A 39-year-old farmer presented with recurrent diplopia attributed to 6th nerve palsy, with eight episodes over 14 years. Despite systemic steroid treatment, the symptoms recurred every 12-18 months. Clinical examination revealed right eye abduction impairment;-, no other abnormalities were detected. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) indicated rhinosinusitis, and the results of the autoimmune antibody test were negative.
Clinical Discussion:
This case challenges conventional diagnostic approaches, underscoring the need for a comprehensive evaluation and tailored management strategies. Despite extensive investigations, the etiology remains elusive, emphasizing the complexity of recurrent diplopia.
Conclusion:
Continued monitoring and further investigation are warranted to unravel the enigma of recurrent diplopia in this unique case, highlighting the importance of individualized approaches to guide optimal management.
Keywords: Recurrent diplopia, 6th nerve palsy, autoimmune disease, systemic steroid, neuro-ophthalmology.
Highlights
- Recurrent diplopia is a diagnostic puzzle, especially in terms of etiology
- Despite treatment, the patient experienced recurrent diplopia attributed to 6th nerve palsy for 14 years, highlighting the chronic nature of the condition.
- Extensive evaluation failed to identify the underlying cause, which illustrates the diagnostic complexity of recurrent diplopia.
- Systemic steroid treatment provided temporary relief, but the recurrence persisted, necessitating long-term management.
- This case emphasizes the need for tailored approaches and ongoing monitoring to effectively address the challenges in managing recurrent diplopia.
INTRODUCTION Recurrent diplopia presents a diagnostic problem, especially when associated with 6th nerve palsy. The etiology of recurrent diplopia in older individuals has yet to be well described in the literature.1 We present a case of a 39-year-old male farmer with eight episodes of diplopia over 14 years, each responding to systemic steroid therapy but recurring every 12-18 months. Despite the patient's clinical response, the underlying etiology remains elusive, emphasizing the complexity of this rare condition. This case prompts a thorough exploration of the potential inflammatory or autoimmune origins of recurrent 6th nerve palsy, addressing the disorder's symptomatic relief and recurrent nature.1,2 This report contributes to the limited literature on such cases, shedding light on the challenges and considerations in managing this recurrent neuro-ophthalmological condition.
CASE REPORT
In this case, a 39-year-old male, a married farmer, was presented to the Neuromedicine OPD for a follow-up examination of recurrent diplopia attributed to 6th nerve palsy. The patient reported no recent instances of double vision or associated complaints during the follow-up visit. Notably, the last episode of diplopia occurred 13 months prior, and the patient had experienced eight such episodes over 14 years since 2008.
During the previous episode, the patient sought medical attention with the chief complaint of acute-onset double vision persisting for 10 days. No significant concurrent medical or surgical issues were reported, aside from a recurrent history of diplopia, and treatment during previous occurrences involving systemic steroid administration, resulting in the complete resolution of symptoms. Recurrence typically manifest within 12-18 months of treatment.
Clinical examination revealed that the patient could not abduct the right eye, whereas the remaining ocular and systemic examinations yielded normal results. Notably, there were no signs of myasthenia gravis, ptosis, and pain on the movement of the eyeballs, decreased visual acuity, trauma, red eyes, headache, focal neurological deficits, or meningeal or cerebellar abnormalities. Brain MRI revealed no abnormalities, except for the presence of rhinosinusitis.
A comprehensive antibody panel, including anti-acetylcholinesterase receptor antibodies and anti-MUSK antibody tests, was used to investigate the possibility of an autoimmune etiology. All results from these tests were negative, further complicating the determination of the underlying cause of recurrent diplopia. Continued monitoring and further investigations may be necessary to elucidate the nature of this unique case and to guide appropriate management.
DISCUSSION
The case of a 39-year-old male farmer with recurrent diplopia attributed to 6th nerve palsy highlights the diagnostic challenges and complexities of managing this rare condition. Despite the patient's clinical response to systemic steroid therapy, the underlying etiology remains elusive, emphasizing the need for thorough exploration of the potential inflammatory or autoimmune origins of recurrent 6th nerve palsy.
The literature suggests that benign recurrent 6th nerve palsy in children is rare, and recurrences are rarer.3, 4 This condition typically occurs following viral illnesses, infections, and immunization involving attenuated live vaccinations. In adults, the evaluation and management of recent-onset diplopia in adults with a history of long-standing strabismus can be perplexing and challenging.5 The causes of isolated recurrent ipsilateral sixth nerve palsies in older adults have not been well described in the literature, and the etiology of recurrent isolated sixth nerve palsies in older adults has not been well described.1 The clinical presentation of isolated recurrent diplopia from a sixth nerve palsy should prompt a neurologist or ophthalmologist to order a brain MRI with and without gadolinium as part of the initial workup to rule out a non-microvascular cause, such as a compressive lesion.1 The exact pathophysiologic mechanism of the relapsing and remitting course of the sixth nerve palsy has yet to be fully understood. This may be related to a structural lesion or an inflammatory process.1 The etiological diagnosis of diplopia is a clinical challenge.4 Binocular diplopia is referred to in the literature as the most common type, and there are several etiological mechanisms of binocular diplopia, including orbital disorders, extra-ocular muscle disorders, neuromuscular junction dysfunction, and primary or secondary visual cortex diseases.4 In conclusion, the case of a 39-year-old male farmer with recurrent diplopia attributed to 6th nerve palsy highlights the diagnostic challenges and complexities of managing this rare condition. The literature suggests that benign recurrent 6th nerve palsy in children is rare, and recurrences are rarer. By contributing to the existing literature on this rare condition, we aimed to enhance awareness among clinicians and foster a multidisciplinary approach to patient care, ultimately improving outcomes in individuals with similar presentations.
Consent:
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for the publication of this case report. A copy of the written consent form is available for review by the editor-in-chief of the journal upon request.
Ethical Approval:
Ethical approval is not required for case report.
Source of Funding:
There is no source of Funding.
Research Registration:
Research registration is not required as this is only a case report.
Author contribution:
P.P.: Conceptualization, project administration, supervision, writing -review, and editing. K.R.B.: Conceptualization, project administration, supervision, writing-review, and editing. R.K.C: Formal analysis, writing -original draft, writing-review, and editing. N.R.: Writing- original draft, writing-review and editing. S.M.: Resources, supervision, writing-original draft, writing-review and editing. B.A.: Resources, writing-original draft, writing-review, and editing. K.S.: Resources, writing-original draft, writing-review, and editing.
Conflict of Interest:
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest. The work has been reported as being in line with SCARE criteria.
Guarantor:
Prabesh Panta.
Data availability statement:
The datasets are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
REFERENCES:
- Chan JW, Albretson J. Causes of isolated recurrent ipsilateral sixth nerve palsies in older adults: a case series and review of the literature. Clin Ophthalmol Auckl NZ. 2015;9:373. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4348047/
- Patel SV, Mutyala S, Leske DA, Hodge DO, Holmes JM. Incidence, associations, and evaluation of sixth nerve palsy using a population-based method. Ophthalmology. 2004 Feb ;111(2):369-75. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0161642003011849
- Gonçalves R, Coelho P, Menezes C, Ribeiro I. Benign Recurrent Sixth Nerve Palsy in a Child. Case Rep Ophthalmol Med. 2017:8276256. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5763058/
- Kushner BJ. Recently Acquired Diplopia in Adults With Long-standing Strabismus. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001 Dec 1;119(12):1795-801. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.119.12.1795
- Alves M, Miranda A, Narciso MR, Mieiro L, Fonseca T. Diplopia: A Diagnostic Challenge with Common and Rare Etiologies. Am J Case Rep. 2015 Apr 13;16:220-3. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4410729/
- Conditions
- Neurologic Manifestations
- Medical subject headings
- Neurologic Manifestations
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
A Decade-Long Dance with Diplopia: Unraveling the Enigma of Recurrent 6th Nerve Palsy
As this is only a case report. No primary outcome was present.
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Jul 2024
- Study start15 Jan 2024
- Primary completion15 Mar 2024
- Study completion15 Jun 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Neurologic ManifestationsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 1 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- College of Medical Sciences, Bharatpur
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Kamal Raj Baral, College of Medical Sciences, Bharatpur
- Investigators
- Prabesh Panta, Principal investigator, College of Medical Sciences, Bharatpur
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06512636
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 0000
- Status last verified
- Jul 2024
- First submitted
- 16 Jul 2024
- Last updated
- 22 Jul 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided: This is a case report only and we are trying to obtain the Rrsearch registration ID. If the Clinicaltrials.gov need more information about this case report then feel free to contact at kamalrajbaral74@gmail.com
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Jul 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Decade-Long Dance With Diplopia: Unraveling the Enigma of Recurrent 6th Nerve Palsy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06512636
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 0000
- Conditions
- Neurologic Manifestations
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- College of Medical Sciences, BharatpurUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 15 Jan 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Mar 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Jun 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Jul 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Abstract:
Introduction and Importance:
Recurrent diplopia poses a diagnostic challenge, necessitating a thorough evaluation to elucidate its underlying etiology and guide its management. We present the case of a 39-year-old farmer with recurrent 6th nerve palsy for over a decade, highlighting the complexity and persistence of this condition.
Case Presentation:
A 39-year-old farmer presented with recurrent diplopia attributed to 6th nerve palsy, with eight episodes over 14 years. Despite systemic steroid treatment, the symptoms recurred every 12-18 months. Clinical examination revealed right eye abduction impairment;-, no other abnormalities were detected. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) indicated rhinosinusitis, and the results of the autoimmune antibody test were negative.
Clinical Discussion:
This case challenges conventional diagnostic approaches, underscoring the need for a comprehensive evaluation and tailored management strategies. Despite extensive investigations, the etiology remains elusive, emphasizing the complexity of recurrent diplopia.
Conclusion:
Continued monitoring and further investigation are warranted to unravel the enigma of recurrent diplopia in this unique case, highlighting the importance of individualized approaches to guide optimal management.
Detailed description
A Decade-Long Dance with Diplopia: Unraveling the Enigma of Recurrent 6th Nerve Palsy
ABSTRACT
Introduction and Importance:
Recurrent diplopia poses a diagnostic challenge, necessitating a thorough evaluation to elucidate its underlying etiology and guide its management. We present the case of a 39-year-old farmer with recurrent 6th nerve palsy for over a decade, highlighting the complexity and persistence of this condition.
Case Presentation:
A 39-year-old farmer presented with recurrent diplopia attributed to 6th nerve palsy, with eight episodes over 14 years. Despite systemic steroid treatment, the symptoms recurred every 12-18 months. Clinical examination revealed right eye abduction impairment;-, no other abnormalities were detected. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) indicated rhinosinusitis, and the results of the autoimmune antibody test were negative.
Clinical Discussion:
This case challenges conventional diagnostic approaches, underscoring the need for a comprehensive evaluation and tailored management strategies. Despite extensive investigations, the etiology remains elusive, emphasizing the complexity of recurrent diplopia.
Conclusion:
Continued monitoring and further investigation are warranted to unravel the enigma of recurrent diplopia in this unique case, highlighting the importance of individualized approaches to guide optimal management.
Keywords: Recurrent diplopia, 6th nerve palsy, autoimmune disease, systemic steroid, neuro-ophthalmology.
Highlights
- Recurrent diplopia is a diagnostic puzzle, especially in terms of etiology
- Despite treatment, the patient experienced recurrent diplopia attributed to 6th nerve palsy for 14 years, highlighting the chronic nature of the condition.
- Extensive evaluation failed to identify the underlying cause, which illustrates the diagnostic complexity of recurrent diplopia.
- Systemic steroid treatment provided temporary relief, but the recurrence persisted, necessitating long-term management.
- This case emphasizes the need for tailored approaches and ongoing monitoring to effectively address the challenges in managing recurrent diplopia.
INTRODUCTION Recurrent diplopia presents a diagnostic problem, especially when associated with 6th nerve palsy. The etiology of recurrent diplopia in older individuals has yet to be well described in the literature.1 We present a case of a 39-year-old male farmer with eight episodes of diplopia over 14 years, each responding to systemic steroid therapy but recurring every 12-18 months. Despite the patient's clinical response, the underlying etiology remains elusive, emphasizing the complexity of this rare condition. This case prompts a thorough exploration of the potential inflammatory or autoimmune origins of recurrent 6th nerve palsy, addressing the disorder's symptomatic relief and recurrent nature.1,2 This report contributes to the limited literature on such cases, shedding light on the challenges and considerations in managing this recurrent neuro-ophthalmological condition.
CASE REPORT
In this case, a 39-year-old male, a married farmer, was presented to the Neuromedicine OPD for a follow-up examination of recurrent diplopia attributed to 6th nerve palsy. The patient reported no recent instances of double vision or associated complaints during the follow-up visit. Notably, the last episode of diplopia occurred 13 months prior, and the patient had experienced eight such episodes over 14 years since 2008.
During the previous episode, the patient sought medical attention with the chief complaint of acute-onset double vision persisting for 10 days. No significant concurrent medical or surgical issues were reported, aside from a recurrent history of diplopia, and treatment during previous occurrences involving systemic steroid administration, resulting in the complete resolution of symptoms. Recurrence typically manifest within 12-18 months of treatment.
Clinical examination revealed that the patient could not abduct the right eye, whereas the remaining ocular and systemic examinations yielded normal results. Notably, there were no signs of myasthenia gravis, ptosis, and pain on the movement of the eyeballs, decreased visual acuity, trauma, red eyes, headache, focal neurological deficits, or meningeal or cerebellar abnormalities. Brain MRI revealed no abnormalities, except for the presence of rhinosinusitis.
A comprehensive antibody panel, including anti-acetylcholinesterase receptor antibodies and anti-MUSK antibody tests, was used to investigate the possibility of an autoimmune etiology. All results from these tests were negative, further complicating the determination of the underlying cause of recurrent diplopia. Continued monitoring and further investigations may be necessary to elucidate the nature of this unique case and to guide appropriate management.
DISCUSSION
The case of a 39-year-old male farmer with recurrent diplopia attributed to 6th nerve palsy highlights the diagnostic challenges and complexities of managing this rare condition. Despite the patient's clinical response to systemic steroid therapy, the underlying etiology remains elusive, emphasizing the need for thorough exploration of the potential inflammatory or autoimmune origins of recurrent 6th nerve palsy.
The literature suggests that benign recurrent 6th nerve palsy in children is rare, and recurrences are rarer.3, 4 This condition typically occurs following viral illnesses, infections, and immunization involving attenuated live vaccinations. In adults, the evaluation and management of recent-onset diplopia in adults with a history of long-standing strabismus can be perplexing and challenging.5 The causes of isolated recurrent ipsilateral sixth nerve palsies in older adults have not been well described in the literature, and the etiology of recurrent isolated sixth nerve palsies in older adults has not been well described.1 The clinical presentation of isolated recurrent diplopia from a sixth nerve palsy should prompt a neurologist or ophthalmologist to order a brain MRI with and without gadolinium as part of the initial workup to rule out a non-microvascular cause, such as a compressive lesion.1 The exact pathophysiologic mechanism of the relapsing and remitting course of the sixth nerve palsy has yet to be fully understood. This may be related to a structural lesion or an inflammatory process.1 The etiological diagnosis of diplopia is a clinical challenge.4 Binocular diplopia is referred to in the literature as the most common type, and there are several etiological mechanisms of binocular diplopia, including orbital disorders, extra-ocular muscle disorders, neuromuscular junction dysfunction, and primary or secondary visual cortex diseases.4 In conclusion, the case of a 39-year-old male farmer with recurrent diplopia attributed to 6th nerve palsy highlights the diagnostic challenges and complexities of managing this rare condition. The literature suggests that benign recurrent 6th nerve palsy in children is rare, and recurrences are rarer. By contributing to the existing literature on this rare condition, we aimed to enhance awareness among clinicians and foster a multidisciplinary approach to patient care, ultimately improving outcomes in individuals with similar presentations.
Consent:
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for the publication of this case report. A copy of the written consent form is available for review by the editor-in-chief of the journal upon request.
Ethical Approval:
Ethical approval is not required for case report.
Source of Funding:
There is no source of Funding.
Research Registration:
Research registration is not required as this is only a case report.
Author contribution:
P.P.: Conceptualization, project administration, supervision, writing -review, and editing. K.R.B.: Conceptualization, project administration, supervision, writing-review, and editing. R.K.C: Formal analysis, writing -original draft, writing-review, and editing. N.R.: Writing- original draft, writing-review and editing. S.M.: Resources, supervision, writing-original draft, writing-review and editing. B.A.: Resources, writing-original draft, writing-review, and editing. K.S.: Resources, writing-original draft, writing-review, and editing.
Conflict of Interest:
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest. The work has been reported as being in line with SCARE criteria.
Guarantor:
Prabesh Panta.
Data availability statement:
The datasets are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
REFERENCES:
- Chan JW, Albretson J. Causes of isolated recurrent ipsilateral sixth nerve palsies in older adults: a case series and review of the literature. Clin Ophthalmol Auckl NZ. 2015;9:373. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4348047/
- Patel SV, Mutyala S, Leske DA, Hodge DO, Holmes JM. Incidence, associations, and evaluation of sixth nerve palsy using a population-based method. Ophthalmology. 2004 Feb ;111(2):369-75. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0161642003011849
- Gonçalves R, Coelho P, Menezes C, Ribeiro I. Benign Recurrent Sixth Nerve Palsy in a Child. Case Rep Ophthalmol Med. 2017:8276256. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5763058/
- Kushner BJ. Recently Acquired Diplopia in Adults With Long-standing Strabismus. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001 Dec 1;119(12):1795-801. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.119.12.1795
- Alves M, Miranda A, Narciso MR, Mieiro L, Fonseca T. Diplopia: A Diagnostic Challenge with Common and Rare Etiologies. Am J Case Rep. 2015 Apr 13;16:220-3. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4410729/
Study design
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- This is a case report of a 39 year old male.
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- This is only a case report of 39-years-old male.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- -
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
A Decade-Long Dance with Diplopia: Unraveling the Enigma of Recurrent 6th Nerve Palsy
Time frame: 6 months
As this is only a case report. No primary outcome was present.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Jul 2024.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided. This is a case report only and we are trying to obtain the Rrsearch registration ID. If the Clinicaltrials.gov need more information about this case report then feel free to contact at kamalrajbaral74@gmail.com
Related trials for Neurologic Manifestations
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Stress Ball Use During Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal After Coronary Angiography
Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal, Stress Ball
Not yet recruiting
BrainGate2: Feasibility Study of an Intracortical Neural Interface System for Persons With Aphasia (BG-Aphasia-01)
Expressive Aphasia, Aphasia Following Cerebral Infarction
Recruiting
Empowered Relief® for Cancer Survivors With Chronic Pain
Chronic Pain Due to Cancer, Pain Catastrophizing
Enrolling by invitation
Online Exercise Program for Transplant Patients: A Pilot Study
Kidney Transplantation, Physical Function
Recruiting
Addressing Nocturia in Older Women Utilizing Behavioral Sleep Intervention and Brief Mindfulness
Nocturia, Insomnia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Prabesh Panta principal investigator
College of Medical Sciences, Bharatpur
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Neurologic Manifestations, run by College of Medical Sciences, Bharatpur at 1 site in Nepal.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Jul 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Nepal. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
A Decade-Long Dance with Diplopia: Unraveling the Enigma of Recurrent 6th Nerve Palsy (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Jul 2024.