AzTrials
AzTrials

Healthcare Provider Well-beingNCT06517082

Ambient AI for Provider Well-Being

A study testing Artificial Intelligence in people with Healthcare Provider Well-being, run by University of Wisconsin, Madison at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether using Ambient Artificial Intelligence for provider documentation will enhance provider well-being and improve documentation quality. Participants will complete their documentation using the Ambient AI software. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Healthcare Provider Well-being
What is being tested?
Artificial Intelligence
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
66 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
15 Aug 2024to 27 Mar 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Healthcare Provider in the UW Health Outpatient Clinic Setting
  • Willingness to engage and use ambient technology
  • Owns an Apple mobile device, as the software is accessible only on this platform
  • Adult (greater than 18 years)
  • English or Spanish speaking
  • Completed the training and in-servicing required to use the tool
  • Providing outpatient care to no less than 20 encounters on a weekly average

Who cannot join

  • Planned leave in 6 weeks following randomization
  • Not registered onto Epic's mobile Haiku system for access
  • Enrolled in a virtual scribe program and not willing to leave the program

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of Wisconsin

    Madison, Wisconsin, 53705

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: An EHR-embedded Pragmatic Stepped-wedge Individual Randomized Clinical Trial of Ambient Artificial Intelligence to Improve Provider Well-Being

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether using Ambient Artificial Intelligence for provider documentation will enhance provider well-being and improve documentation quality.

Participants will complete their documentation using the Ambient AI software.

Read the detailed description

Provider documentation of patient visits is a time-consuming activity that extends throughout the workday and often continues outside office hours. This ongoing clerical burden negatively impacts provider well-being, contributing to burnout and job dissatisfaction.

To address these challenges, the researchers propose to test the effectiveness of the Ambient AI tool in improving provider fulfillment and note documentation efficiency. The overarching goal is to leverage AI technology to enhance provider well-being and documentation quality.

Being tested
Artificial Intelligence
Keywords
Artificial Intelligence, Physician well-being, Healthcare provider

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Artificial IntelligenceOther

    Ambient AI software intervention is implemented into the providers workflow. The software incorporates Automated Speech Recognition technology with Large Language Models to generate clinical documentation in real-time.

Study groups in NCT06517082
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Ambient Listening Group 1ExperimentalParticipants randomized to this arm will start using Ambient AI at week 7.
Receives: Other: Artificial Intelligence
Ambient Listening Group 2ExperimentalParticipants randomized to this arm will start using Ambient AI at week 13.
Receives: Other: Artificial Intelligence
Ambient Listening Group 3ExperimentalParticipants randomized to this arm will start using Ambient AI at week 19.
Receives: Other: Artificial Intelligence

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in provider fulfillment index

    Using the Professional Well-Being Academic Consortium Survey Measures, the fulfillment index is a 6-item questionnaire. Each question is scored on a 0-4 Likert scale, with total possible scores of 0-24. Higher scores indicate greater fulfillment

    Measured: Baseline to weeks 6, 12, 18, and 24

  2. Change in provider burnout

    Using the Professional Well-Being Academic Consortium Survey Measures, the burnout index includes two subcomponents of work exhaustion and interpersonal disengagement. It is a 10-item questionnaire, scored together as a composite. Each question is scored on a 0-4 Likert scale, with a total possible range of 0-40. Higher scores indicate greater burnout, indicating lower well-being

    Measured: Baseline to weeks 6, 12, 18, and 24

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Change in time spent on documentation outside work hours

    Providers will track amount of time spent on EHR (electronic health records) outside of scheduled patient hours per 8 hours of patient scheduled time

    Measured: Baseline to 24 weeks

  2. Change in task load

    Hours spent on documentation per 8 hours of scheduled patient time

    Measured: Baseline to 24 weeks

  3. Change in meaningfulness of work

    Meaningfulness of work is a 4-item questionnaire, where each question is scored on a 0-4 Likert scale. Total possible scores range from 0-16, with higher scores indicating lower sense of meaningfulness of work.

    Measured: Baseline to 24 weeks

  4. Change in meaningful relationships

    Using the Professional Well-Being Academic Consortium Survey Measures, the negative impact of work on relationships index is a 4-item questionnaire. Each question is scored on a 0-4 Likert scale, with total possible scores ranging from 0-16. Higher scores indicate less meaningful relationships.

    Measured: Baseline to 24 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Jul 2024
  2. Study start15 Aug 2024
  3. Primary completion27 Mar 2025
  4. Study completion27 Mar 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
The stepped wedge design involves staggered implementation of an intervention across different providers over multiple time periods, allowing all providers to eventually receive the intervention.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
66 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06517082
Sponsor's protocol ID
2024-1028
Other IDs
A534285, Protocol Version 7/7/2024
Status last verified
May 2025
First submitted
18 Jul 2024
Last updated
30 May 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: As part of the UW Learning Health System, the data queries, data dictionary, and data procedure will be mirrored over from the UW Health GitHub instance to SMPH GitLab instance for secondary research use. All patient data except timestamps will be deidentified (limited dataset) and managed and stored on SMPH servers and devices and provided through Clinical Research Data Service (CRDS) team in ICTR's Center for Health Informatics Institute and the UW SMPH Honest Broker. Provider data will be stored with identifiers for the follow-up focus groups and interviews.

Publications

  • Afshar M, Baumann MR, Resnik F, Hintzke J, Sullivan AG, Wills G, Lemmon K, Dambach J, Ann Mrotek L, Quinn M, Abramson K, Kleinschmidt P, Brazelton TB, Leaf MA, Twedt H, Kunstman D, Patterson B, Liao F, Rasmussen S, Burnside ES, Goswami C, Gordon J. A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial of Ambient Artificial Intelligence to Improve Health Practitioner Well-Being. NEJM AI. 2025 Dec;2(12):10.1056/aioa2500945. doi: 10.1056/aioa2500945. Epub 2025 Nov 26.

    PubMed 41625485
  • Afshar M, Resnik F, Baumann MR, Hintzke J, Lemmon K, Sullivan AG, Shah T, Stordalen A, Oberst M, Dambach J, Mrotek LA, Quinn M, Abramson K, Kleinschmidt P, Brazelton T, Twedt H, Kunstman D, Wills G, Long J, Patterson BW, Liao FJ, Rasmussen S, Burnside E, Goswami C, Gordon JE. A Novel Playbook for Pragmatic Trial Operations to Monitor and Evaluate Ambient Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Practice. NEJM AI. 2025 Sep;2(9):10.1056/aidbp2401267. doi: 10.1056/aidbp2401267. Epub 2025 Aug 28.

    PubMed 40959192
  • Afshar M, Resnik F, Baumann MR, Hintzke J, Lemmon K, Sullivan AG, Shah T, Stordalen A, Oberst M, Dambach J, Mrotek LA, Quinn M, Abramson K, Kleinschmidt P, Brazelton T, Twedt H, Kunstman D, Wills G, Long J, Patterson BW, Liao FJ, Rasmussen S, Burnside E, Goswami C, Gordon JE. A Novel Playbook for Pragmatic Trial Operations to Monitor and Evaluate Ambient Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Practice. medRxiv [Preprint]. 2025 Aug 14:2024.12.27.24319685. doi: 10.1101/2024.12.27.24319685.

    PubMed 39763559

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Artificial Intelligence in people with Healthcare Provider Well-being, run by University of Wisconsin, Madison at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 May 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in provider fulfillment index (time frame: Baseline to weeks 6, 12, 18, and 24). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06517082, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 May 2025.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in