AzTrials
AzTrials

Patient SatisfactionNCT06519123

Ambient Digital Scribes Populating Clinical Notes

A study testing Ambient Digital Scribes in people with Patient Satisfaction and Clinician Satisfaction, run by Duke University at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the impact of Ambient Digital Scribes that will automatically record clinical encounters and use AI technology to populate clinical notes. The investigators expect that when clinicians do not need to either write notes during the clinical encounter and can instead face patients… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Patient Satisfaction, Clinician Satisfaction
What is being tested?
Ambient Digital Scribes
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
261 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
19 Sep 2024to 30 Jan 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Patient Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years or older
  • able to speak and read English

Patient Exclusion Criteria:

  • unable to speak and read English

Clinician Inclusion Criteria:

  • delivering care in a clinic in which Ambient Digital Scribes are being employed

Clinician Exclusion Criteria:

  • not delivering care in a clinic in which Ambient Digital Scribes are being employed

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Duke University Health System

    Durham, North Carolina, 27710

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Assessing the Impact of Ambient Digital Scribes Populating Clinical Notes on Patient and Clinician Satisfaction

The purpose of this study is to assess the impact of Ambient Digital Scribes that will automatically record clinical encounters and use AI technology to populate clinical notes. The investigators expect that when clinicians do not need to either write notes during the clinical encounter and can instead face patients when talking, several effects could result, including 1) patients report higher satisfaction with the visit 2) clinicians report less burnout, and 3) clinician-patient communication includes more evidence-based tools that indicate high quality communication.

Read the detailed description

Effective communication forms the foundation of high-quality care. Communication includes verbal and nonverbal channels, with nonverbal communication playing a large role in acknowledging and responding to patient concerns. Effective communication has been negatively affected by the introduction of the electronic health record and required documentation. Clinicians often attend to the computer, writing notes during the encounter, which can lead to missing emotional cues from patients. Missing this key information can leave patients feeling dismissed, not heard, and can lead to lower comprehension and adherence. Further, the amount clinicians need to document often cannot occur solely in the encounter, leading to clinicians working after hours to finish their notes. The cumulative effect of the change in communication and required documentation has been a strong predictor of burnout among clinicians.

The introduction of AI into healthcare might have a positive impact on both efficiency and communication, thus resulting in higher clinician and patient satisfaction. With the advent of Ambient Digital Scribes and AI potentially populating notes, clinicians can have the opportunity to attend fully to patients both verbally and nonverbally. Patients likely will feel more heard, valued, and can ask questions, leading to higher comprehension and adherence. Clinicians might feel the burden of documentation lifted, might be more efficient, and feel more satisfied by providing the care they desire.

To test the impact of Ambient Digital Scribes, the investigators propose a sub-study to the approved project (Pro00115827) where the investigators will audio record clinicians in usual care before they are assigned to the two different scribing programs. The investigators will assess patient outcomes, namely perceived empathy and patient satisfaction, and clinician burnout. The investigators also will code audio recorded encounters to assess: 1) reflective statements (showing active listening), 2) empathic responses to empathic opportunities, 3) patient question-asking, and 4) length of encounter.

Being tested
Ambient Digital Scribes
Keywords
Ambient Digital Scribes, AI, Communication
Medical subject headings
Patient Satisfaction, Communication

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Ambient Digital ScribesOther

    AI technology used to populate clinical notes.

Study groups in NCT06519123
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Study population - Clinicians and PatientsExperimentalClinicians will audio record 4 patient encounters on two separate days each (240 encounters).
Receives: Other: Ambient Digital Scribes

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Patient-perceived clinician empathy

    Patient perceived empathy will be assessed via post doctor appointment administered survey.

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 2 months

  2. Patient Satisfaction

    Patient satisfaction will be assessed via post doctor appointment administered survey.

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 2 months

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Clinician Satisfaction as measured by level of burnout

    Assessed by clinician-reported levels of burnout via survey.

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 2 months

  2. Clinician Communication

    Communication will be coded for reflective statements (showing active listening), empathic responses to empathic opportunities, patient question-asking, and length of encounter.

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 2 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Jul 2024
  2. Study start19 Sep 2024
  3. Primary completion30 Jan 2025
  4. Study completion30 Jan 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
261 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06519123
Sponsor's protocol ID
Pro00116295
Status last verified
Sep 2024
First submitted
19 Jul 2024
Last updated
14 Feb 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Ambient Digital Scribes in people with Patient Satisfaction and Clinician Satisfaction, run by Duke University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Feb 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Patient-perceived clinician empathy (time frame: through study completion, an average of 2 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Feb 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in