LeiomyosarcomaMYSTRNCT06521060
The Role of Pre-Surgical Tru - Cut Biopsy in the Management of Atypical Myometrial Lesions
An observational study of Leiomyosarcoma, run by Charles University, Czech Republic at 1 site in Czechia.
Trial summary
The Tru-cut biopsy (TCB) for targeting pelvic tumors is well established in gynecologic oncology. However, its reliability for differentiating of uterine sarcoma in "myoma-like" uterine lesions has been confirmed by only a few studies, which were either retrospective or provided only pilot result on the limited number… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Leiomyosarcoma
- What is being tested?
- tru cut biopsy
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 250 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCzechia
- Study dates
- Oct 2024to Jun 2028
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: * Age ≥ 18 years * Women indicated for uterus-preserving surgery (tumour resection) or hysterectomy for myometrial lesion ('myoma-like' uterine tumour(s))
Who may be able to join
- Signed informed consent
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Women indicated for uterus-preserving surgery (tumour resection) or hysterectomy for myometrial lesion ('myoma-like' uterine tumour(s))
- USG finding of atypical myometrial lesion/s a
Who cannot join
- patient 's refusal
- age < 18 years
- ongoing pregnancy
- inability to perform TCB /contraindications for TCB (trombocytopenia, coagulopathy, PID, colpitis) or definitive surgery (myomectomy or hysterectomy)
- USG finding of more than 2 atypical lesion/s with a diameter ≤ 20 mm and ≥ 100 mm
- inability to perform any of the 3 core needle biopsy approaches (transvervical, trans uterine cavity, transvaginal) because of anatomical, localization issues. The percutaneous transabdominal biopsy is not allowed
Show all 11Show fewer
- Polymyomatous uterus that may not be examined adequately with routine transvaginal ultrasound
- myoma (which would be subject to TCB) type 7 according to FIGO classification 16
- history of conservative hormonal therapy less than 3 months prior to study enrolment
- history of conservative therapy via uterine artery embolisation or laparoscopic uterine artery occlusion
- history of pregnancy less than one year prior to study enrollment
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
About this study
The Tru-cut biopsy (TCB) for targeting pelvic tumors is well established in gynecologic oncology. However, its reliability for differentiating of uterine sarcoma in "myoma-like" uterine lesions has been confirmed by only a few studies, which were either retrospective or provided only pilot result on the limited number of prospectively enrolled patients (N=34). Proving that preoperative TCB can provide accurate information about the histological nature of the tumor would have great impact for setting an adequate tailored oncologically safe approach, especially in patients with sonographically atypical lesions. Additionally, the biopsy should be safe, with transcervical, transuterine cavity ("in organ" biopsy) approaches preferred to avoid the risk of needle canal contamination if sarcoma is diagnosed. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of the Tru-cut biopsy (TCB) of sonographically atypical myometrial lesions as a complementary diagnostic method in the preoperative management of patients scheduled for uterus preserving procedure or hysterectomy. Additionally, we aim to assess the impact of this procedure on patients´ quality of life and clinical management. MYSTR is a single arm, prospective, multicentric cohort study.
Read the detailed description
A total of 250 patients is planned to be enrolled, accounting for an estimated 15% dropout rate. Study data will be collected and managed using REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture) open-source platform, which allows for the secure collection of research data via a web-based interface. REDCap was developed by Vanderbilt University in Nashville, Tennessee, is used by Charles University in Prague under a standing agreement to allow the usage of REDCap for academic and research purposes. The REDCap platform environment is compliant with 21 CFR Part 11, FISMA, HIPAA, and GDPR.
Patients will be identified at each of the participating site. If a patient meets all inclusion criteria, she will be informed about the study and asked to sign an informed consent (ICF). All patients referred for TCB will have their blood count and baseline coagulation parameters checked prior to performing the biopsy to eliminate bleeding complications. All patients will undergo a standard-of-care ultrasound examination with a focus on the description of the fibroid with atypical features according to the MUSA statement and/or Basel sarcoma scale score (BSS). A patient will be included in the study if she will meet one or more of the following MUSA criterion: irregular tumor borders, cystic areas in the lesion (as a sign of central necrosis), nonuniform echogenicity, moderate-to-abundant intralesional vascularity and an absence of calcifications, and/or BSS total score ≥ 1.
The patient will be further referred to MRI imaging (optional) and will undergo TCB within 4 weeks after US exam. In selected centers which will decide to participate in this optional part of the trial, all patients with ≥ 1 MUSA criterion and/or BSS total score ≥ 1 based on the US examination will be referred for MRI imaging. Images will be acquired with 3T MRI. The sequences parameters (Sagittal T2, Coronal T2, Axial T2, Axial DWI, Axial T1 3D DIXON, Axial Perfusion T1 3D, Axial T1 3D DIXON post contrast) will be evaluated in accordance with European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) guidelines. Two experienced readers in gynecologic oncology imaging will review all MRI images and calculate the MRI score.
The tru-cut biopsy is performed as an out-patient procedure without the need of any anesthesia in lithotomic position. Using an automatic biopsy gun and 18-gauge disposable core tissue biopsy needle four tissue cylinder samples are taken from the tumor. If the localization of the lesion and anatomical conditions allow, the transcervical approach without breaking the continuity of the perimetrium is preferred. If the lesion is localized in the uterine doom, or targetable by the uterine cavity, the transcervical canal approach is feasible and should be considered. If both above-described methods are not feasible, a transvaginal approach is also possible. In all cases transvaginal US is used for correct navigation. Patients will be observed for 30 minutes following the biopsy and then discharged. Other follow up of the patients will be done 24 hours and two weeks after the procedure via phone with the assessment of the patient´s pain, overall experience, and eventual complications.
Intraoperative and early post-procedural complications will be evaluated, and adverse events will be assessed on the 14th post-TCB day according to the Clavien-Dindo Surgical complications classification. Pain will be assessed during the TCB, 30 minutes after the procedure, and after 24 hours using the Numeric rating scale (NRS). Overall experience will be assessed using questionnaire: FACIT-TS-G (Version 4) 30 minutes after the procedure.
Specimen evaluation will be conducted at each participating site by dedicated, experienced pathologist according to standard diagnostic procedures. The biological nature of spindle cell leiomyocellular tumors will be determined according to Table 2 (modified from the WHO classification of female genital tumors 2020).
If necessary, immunohistochemical or molecular examination will be used. For smooth muscle lesions the gene mutation status of PTEN, pRb, TP53, MTAP, ATRX, and DAXX will be analyzed. In lesions of other histological types, RNA next-generation sequencing will be performed, optionally accompanied by immunohistochemical examination. These examinations are routinely performed as a part of standardized diagnostic procedures and will not be covered by the project's expenses. Histology findings from other than the main sight that will fail to meet the characteristics of conventional leiomyoma (either from TCB or definitive histology result) will undergo a second evaluation at the main site by a senior gyneco-pathologist. Following samples will be stored in biobanks at each respective institution: tumor sample DNA (isolated from one snap-frozen TCB sample); representative formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor tissue block and representative FFPE non-tumor myometrial tissue block (both harvested during curative surgery). All samples will be collected with the intention to be used for future translational and exploratory research, including studies that aim to evaluate the association between biomarkers and clinical-surgical-pathological characteristics. All samples will be stored in the biobank at the respective institution. Participation in the translatory part is not obligatory for the trial participation but is highly recommended. A separate consent form will be provided to the patient to obtain permission for all biological material storage and future translational studies. Based on the histology result obtained from the TCB, patients will be categorized into three groups. Subsequent clinical management will be determined according to the appropriate group:
Subgroup 1: Patients with a typical benign histological result of TCB will undergo elective surgery within 8 weeks from receiving the results, with a preference of a minimally invasive approach, i.e., most often laparoscopic myomectomy or laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Subgroup 2: Patients with an atypical histological result of TCB (i.e., other than conventional leiomyoma but with no signs of malignancy) will undergo elective surgery within 6 weeks from receiving the results, with a preference of laparoscopy but excluding unprotected power morcellation of pathological tissue.
Uncontained morcellation will be used strictly for tumors with benign TCB histology and nonsuspicious perioperative appearance of resected uterine tumor. Contained morcellation technique will be strictly preferred for all other tumors, i.e., with non-standard TCB histology and/or atypical or suspicious perioperative appearance, or standard TCB histology and atypical or suspicious perioperative appearance.
Subgroup 3: Patients with a histological result from the TCB that are clearly malignant or suspicious for malignancy undergo open surgery, specifically abdominal hysterectomy. In cases of women with incomplete reproductive plans, open resection of the tumor may be performed after detailed consultation with the oncogynecological team and the patient, a secondary hysterectomy may be added based on the result of definitive histology. The procedure should be done as soon as possible, with a maximum interval between the result of TCB histology and elective surgery no more than 3 weeks.
In cases of tumors without penetration through the uterine serosa (according to US and perioperatively) and without requiring morcellation for the specimen evacuation, total laparoscopic hysterectomy can be performed.
Subgroup 4: In case of invalid TCB histology result, the patient will undergo contained morcellation during laparoscopic procedure or open surgery within 4 weeks after the TCB.
The definitive histology results from the surgery will be evaluated using the same histopathological criteria as in TCB histology. Definitive histology will be compared with the histological results from the pre-surgical TCB.
For the primary endpoint analysis, the accuracy of the histological results from TCB will be established using the definitive postoperative histological results as a reference standard.
The sample size of 217 patients with sonographically atypical myometrial lesions was calculated to establish the accuracy of the diagnostic method, with the degree of estimate precision of 0.07, 95% confidence and 80% power; assuming ratio between patients with/ without atypical lesion as per final pathology of 23:77, as based on the retrospective database data. Considering a possible dropout or unavailability of data in 15% of the patients, the final sample size reaches 250 patients. Analysis was computed using PASS 13 Power Analysis and Sample Size Software (2014). NCSS, LLC. Kaysville, Utah, USA, ncss.com/software/pass.
If this trial proves the accuracy of TCB of myometrial lesion, it could provide a new diagnostic tool and significantly impact the clinical practice.
A positive study outcome could establish level A evidence for a change of international standards and implement prehabilitation into a routine clinical practice. On a national level, the study aims to standardize and improve the care for gynecological patients with sonographic atypical myometrial lesions. A primary endpoint final analysis is intended for publication in a top medical journal. The study could also provide prospective genomic characterization analyses of myometrial tumors as well as the exploratory analysis of the reliability of individual imaging methods in the preliminary selection of patients with atypical myometrial findings.
- Conditions
- Leiomyosarcoma
- Being tested
- tru cut biopsy
- Keywords
- tru cut biopsy, leiomyoma
- Medical subject headings
- Leiomyosarcoma, Leiomyoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
tru cut biopsyProcedure or surgery
Proving that preoperative TCB could provide accurate information about the histological nature of the tumor would have great impact for setting an adequate, tailored, oncologically safe treatment approach.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Tru cut biopsy | A single arm, prospective, multicentric cohort study. A total of 250 patients is planned to be enrolled, accounting for an estimated 15% dropout rate. Receives: Procedure: tru cut biopsy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Rate of accuracy
Accuracy is defined as the concordance of the results of preoperative histology from TCB with the result of definitive histology from the operative specimen
Measured: 3 years
Secondary outcomes (8)
Rate of adequately performed TCBs
defined as the number of TCBs with adequate encroachment of the lesion with bioptic needle (by the US) and sufficient tissue sample for the histopathological analysis to the total number of TCBs.
Measured: 3 years
Number of complications
number of complications after TCB divided by the number of patients. Intraoperative and early post-procedural complications will be assessed using a questionnaire. Adverse events will be assessed 14th post-TCB day according to the Clavien-Dindo Surgical complications classification
Measured: 3 years
Pain associated with TCB
Assessment of patient´s pain during, 30 minutes after, and 24 hours after the procedure using the Numeric rating scale (NRS)
Measured: 24 hours
Comparison of the preoperative MRI examination to US imaging
Testing the superiority of either approach, sensitivity and specificity of the MRI imaging when compared to US examination will be analyzed
Measured: 3 years
Patient satisfaction with the diagnostic MRI and TCB
1 questionnaire: Patient experience of the diagnostic modalities will be assessed using developed and validated Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire
Measured: 3 years
Impact of TCB on clinical management
the change of clinical management of patients with uterine "myoma-like" tumors caused by the TCB histology results (frequency of open surgeries and rate of necessary use of contained morcellation during laparoscopic myomectomy or hysterectomy)
Measured: 3 years
Frequency of non-standard histological findings
the frequency of atypical histological findings (other than conventional leiomyoma) from the results of definitive histology in the group of women with sonographically atypical initial findings
Measured: 3 years
Validation of the US markers of atypical myometrial lesions
External validation of the MUSA statement and/or Basel sarcoma scale score (BSS), correlation of respective imaging score and final pathology result
Measured: 3 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Jul 2024
- Study startOct 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completionJan 2027 (estimated)
- Study completionJun 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (22)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for LeiomyosarcomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 250 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Charles University, Czech Republic
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Kristyna Hlinecka, Principal investigator, Charles University, Czech Republic
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06521060
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NW24J-03-00025
- Acronym
- MYSTR
- Status last verified
- Nov 2023
- First submitted
- 3 Dec 2023
- Last updated
- 25 Jul 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Abdel Wahab C, Jannot AS, Bonaffini PA, Bourillon C, Cornou C, Lefrere-Belda MA, Bats AS, Thomassin-Naggara I, Bellucci A, Reinhold C, Fournier LS. Diagnostic Algorithm to Differentiate Benign Atypical Leiomyomas from Malignant Uterine Sarcomas with Diffusion-weighted MRI. Radiology. 2020 Nov;297(2):361-371. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020191658. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
PubMed 32930650Bonneau C, Thomassin-Naggara I, Dechoux S, Cortez A, Darai E, Rouzier R. Value of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging for the characterization of uterine mesenchymal tumors. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014 Mar;93(3):261-8. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12325.
PubMed 24372487Kubik-Huch RA, Weston M, Nougaret S, Leonhardt H, Thomassin-Naggara I, Horta M, Cunha TM, Maciel C, Rockall A, Forstner R. European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) Guidelines: MR Imaging of Leiomyomas. Eur Radiol. 2018 Aug;28(8):3125-3137. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-5157-5. Epub 2018 Feb 28.
PubMed 29492599Kawamura N, Ichimura T, Ito F, Shibata S, Takahashi K, Tsujimura A, Ishiko O, Haba T, Wakasa K, Ogita S. Transcervical needle biopsy for the differential diagnosis between uterine sarcoma and leiomyoma. Cancer. 2002 Mar 15;94(6):1713-20. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10382.
PubMed 11920533Tamura R, Kashima K, Asatani M, Nishino K, Nishikawa N, Sekine M, Serikawa T, Enomoto T. Preoperative ultrasound-guided needle biopsy of 63 uterine tumors having high signal intensity upon T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2014 Jul;24(6):1042-7. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000189.
PubMed 24927248Verschuere H, Froyman W, Van den Bosch T, Van Hoefs M, Kaijser J, Van Schoubroeck D, Van Rompuy AS, Vergote I, Timmerman D. Safety and efficiency of performing transvaginal ultrasound-guided tru-cut biopsy for pelvic masses. Gynecol Oncol. 2021 Jun;161(3):845-851. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.03.026. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
PubMed 33858675Mascilini F, Quagliozzi L, Moro F, Moruzzi MC, De Blasis I, Paris V, Scambia G, Fagotti A, Testa AC. Role of transvaginal ultrasound-guided biopsy in gynecology. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 Jan;30(1):128-132. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000734. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
PubMed 31645428Wang L, Li S, Zhang Z, Jia J, Shan B. Prevalence and occult rates of uterine leiomyosarcoma. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Aug 14;99(33):e21766. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021766.
PubMed 32872073Raffone A, Raimondo D, Neola D, Travaglino A, Giorgi M, Lazzeri L, De Laurentiis F, Carravetta C, Zupi E, Seracchioli R, Casadio P, Guida M. Diagnostic accuracy of MRI in the differential diagnosis between uterine leiomyomas and sarcomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2024 Apr;165(1):22-33. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.15136. Epub 2023 Sep 21.
PubMed 37732472Knipprath-Meszaros AM, Tozzi A, Butenschon A, Reina H, Schoetzau A, Montavon C, Heinzelmann-Schwarz V, Manegold-Brauer G. High negative prediction for the Basel sarcoma score: Sonographic assessment of features suspicious of uterine sarcoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2023 Jul;174:182-189. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.05.005. Epub 2023 May 19.
PubMed 37210928De Bruyn C, Ceusters J, Vanden Brande K, Timmerman S, Froyman W, Timmerman D, Van Rompuy AS, Coosemans A, Van den Bosch T. Ultrasound features using MUSA terms and definitions in uterine sarcoma and leiomyoma: cohort study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2024 May;63(5):683-690. doi: 10.1002/uog.27535. Epub 2024 Apr 5.
PubMed 37970762Bell SW, Kempson RL, Hendrickson MR. Problematic uterine smooth muscle neoplasms. A clinicopathologic study of 213 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 1994 Jun;18(6):535-58.
PubMed 8179071Bedient CE, Magrina JF, Noble BN, Kho RM. Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic myomectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Dec;201(6):566.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.05.049. Epub 2009 Aug 15.
PubMed 19683685Suzuki Y, Wada S, Nakajima A, Fukushi Y, Hayashi M, Matsuda T, Asano R, Sakurai Y, Noguchi H, Shinohara T, Sato C, Fujino T. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Grading System for Preoperative Diagnosis of Leiomyomas and Uterine Smooth Muscle Tumors. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018 Mar-Apr;25(3):507-513. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.08.660. Epub 2017 Oct 24.
PubMed 29079462Cotrino I, Carosso A, Macchi C, Baima Poma C, Cosma S, Ribotta M, Viora E, Sciarrone A, Borella F, Zola P. Ultrasound and clinical characteristics of uterine smooth muscle tumors of uncertain malignant potential (STUMPs). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020 Aug;251:167-172. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.05.040. Epub 2020 May 25.
PubMed 32505056
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Jul 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Role of Pre-Surgical Tru - Cut Biopsy in the Management of Atypical Myometrial Lesions
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06521060
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MYSTR / NW24J-03-00025
- Conditions
- Leiomyosarcoma
- Keywords
- tru cut biopsy, leiomyoma
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 250 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Charles University, Czech RepublicUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Oct 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Jan 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jun 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 25 Jul 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The Tru-cut biopsy (TCB) for targeting pelvic tumors is well established in gynecologic oncology. However, its reliability for differentiating of uterine sarcoma in "myoma-like" uterine lesions has been confirmed by only a few studies, which were either retrospective or provided only pilot result on the limited number of prospectively enrolled patients (N=34). Proving that preoperative TCB can provide accurate information about the histological nature of the tumor would have great impact for setting an adequate tailored oncologically safe approach, especially in patients with sonographically atypical lesions. Additionally, the biopsy should be safe, with transcervical, transuterine cavity ("in organ" biopsy) approaches preferred to avoid the risk of needle canal contamination if sarcoma is diagnosed. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of the Tru-cut biopsy (TCB) of sonographically atypical myometrial lesions as a complementary diagnostic method in the preoperative management of patients scheduled for uterus preserving procedure or hysterectomy. Additionally, we aim to assess the impact of this procedure on patients´ quality of life and clinical management. MYSTR is a single arm, prospective, multicentric cohort study.
Detailed description
A total of 250 patients is planned to be enrolled, accounting for an estimated 15% dropout rate. Study data will be collected and managed using REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture) open-source platform, which allows for the secure collection of research data via a web-based interface. REDCap was developed by Vanderbilt University in Nashville, Tennessee, is used by Charles University in Prague under a standing agreement to allow the usage of REDCap for academic and research purposes. The REDCap platform environment is compliant with 21 CFR Part 11, FISMA, HIPAA, and GDPR.
Patients will be identified at each of the participating site. If a patient meets all inclusion criteria, she will be informed about the study and asked to sign an informed consent (ICF). All patients referred for TCB will have their blood count and baseline coagulation parameters checked prior to performing the biopsy to eliminate bleeding complications. All patients will undergo a standard-of-care ultrasound examination with a focus on the description of the fibroid with atypical features according to the MUSA statement and/or Basel sarcoma scale score (BSS). A patient will be included in the study if she will meet one or more of the following MUSA criterion: irregular tumor borders, cystic areas in the lesion (as a sign of central necrosis), nonuniform echogenicity, moderate-to-abundant intralesional vascularity and an absence of calcifications, and/or BSS total score ≥ 1.
The patient will be further referred to MRI imaging (optional) and will undergo TCB within 4 weeks after US exam. In selected centers which will decide to participate in this optional part of the trial, all patients with ≥ 1 MUSA criterion and/or BSS total score ≥ 1 based on the US examination will be referred for MRI imaging. Images will be acquired with 3T MRI. The sequences parameters (Sagittal T2, Coronal T2, Axial T2, Axial DWI, Axial T1 3D DIXON, Axial Perfusion T1 3D, Axial T1 3D DIXON post contrast) will be evaluated in accordance with European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) guidelines. Two experienced readers in gynecologic oncology imaging will review all MRI images and calculate the MRI score.
The tru-cut biopsy is performed as an out-patient procedure without the need of any anesthesia in lithotomic position. Using an automatic biopsy gun and 18-gauge disposable core tissue biopsy needle four tissue cylinder samples are taken from the tumor. If the localization of the lesion and anatomical conditions allow, the transcervical approach without breaking the continuity of the perimetrium is preferred. If the lesion is localized in the uterine doom, or targetable by the uterine cavity, the transcervical canal approach is feasible and should be considered. If both above-described methods are not feasible, a transvaginal approach is also possible. In all cases transvaginal US is used for correct navigation. Patients will be observed for 30 minutes following the biopsy and then discharged. Other follow up of the patients will be done 24 hours and two weeks after the procedure via phone with the assessment of the patient´s pain, overall experience, and eventual complications.
Intraoperative and early post-procedural complications will be evaluated, and adverse events will be assessed on the 14th post-TCB day according to the Clavien-Dindo Surgical complications classification. Pain will be assessed during the TCB, 30 minutes after the procedure, and after 24 hours using the Numeric rating scale (NRS). Overall experience will be assessed using questionnaire: FACIT-TS-G (Version 4) 30 minutes after the procedure.
Specimen evaluation will be conducted at each participating site by dedicated, experienced pathologist according to standard diagnostic procedures. The biological nature of spindle cell leiomyocellular tumors will be determined according to Table 2 (modified from the WHO classification of female genital tumors 2020).
If necessary, immunohistochemical or molecular examination will be used. For smooth muscle lesions the gene mutation status of PTEN, pRb, TP53, MTAP, ATRX, and DAXX will be analyzed. In lesions of other histological types, RNA next-generation sequencing will be performed, optionally accompanied by immunohistochemical examination. These examinations are routinely performed as a part of standardized diagnostic procedures and will not be covered by the project's expenses. Histology findings from other than the main sight that will fail to meet the characteristics of conventional leiomyoma (either from TCB or definitive histology result) will undergo a second evaluation at the main site by a senior gyneco-pathologist. Following samples will be stored in biobanks at each respective institution: tumor sample DNA (isolated from one snap-frozen TCB sample); representative formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor tissue block and representative FFPE non-tumor myometrial tissue block (both harvested during curative surgery). All samples will be collected with the intention to be used for future translational and exploratory research, including studies that aim to evaluate the association between biomarkers and clinical-surgical-pathological characteristics. All samples will be stored in the biobank at the respective institution. Participation in the translatory part is not obligatory for the trial participation but is highly recommended. A separate consent form will be provided to the patient to obtain permission for all biological material storage and future translational studies. Based on the histology result obtained from the TCB, patients will be categorized into three groups. Subsequent clinical management will be determined according to the appropriate group:
Subgroup 1: Patients with a typical benign histological result of TCB will undergo elective surgery within 8 weeks from receiving the results, with a preference of a minimally invasive approach, i.e., most often laparoscopic myomectomy or laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Subgroup 2: Patients with an atypical histological result of TCB (i.e., other than conventional leiomyoma but with no signs of malignancy) will undergo elective surgery within 6 weeks from receiving the results, with a preference of laparoscopy but excluding unprotected power morcellation of pathological tissue.
Uncontained morcellation will be used strictly for tumors with benign TCB histology and nonsuspicious perioperative appearance of resected uterine tumor. Contained morcellation technique will be strictly preferred for all other tumors, i.e., with non-standard TCB histology and/or atypical or suspicious perioperative appearance, or standard TCB histology and atypical or suspicious perioperative appearance.
Subgroup 3: Patients with a histological result from the TCB that are clearly malignant or suspicious for malignancy undergo open surgery, specifically abdominal hysterectomy. In cases of women with incomplete reproductive plans, open resection of the tumor may be performed after detailed consultation with the oncogynecological team and the patient, a secondary hysterectomy may be added based on the result of definitive histology. The procedure should be done as soon as possible, with a maximum interval between the result of TCB histology and elective surgery no more than 3 weeks.
In cases of tumors without penetration through the uterine serosa (according to US and perioperatively) and without requiring morcellation for the specimen evacuation, total laparoscopic hysterectomy can be performed.
Subgroup 4: In case of invalid TCB histology result, the patient will undergo contained morcellation during laparoscopic procedure or open surgery within 4 weeks after the TCB.
The definitive histology results from the surgery will be evaluated using the same histopathological criteria as in TCB histology. Definitive histology will be compared with the histological results from the pre-surgical TCB.
For the primary endpoint analysis, the accuracy of the histological results from TCB will be established using the definitive postoperative histological results as a reference standard.
The sample size of 217 patients with sonographically atypical myometrial lesions was calculated to establish the accuracy of the diagnostic method, with the degree of estimate precision of 0.07, 95% confidence and 80% power; assuming ratio between patients with/ without atypical lesion as per final pathology of 23:77, as based on the retrospective database data. Considering a possible dropout or unavailability of data in 15% of the patients, the final sample size reaches 250 patients. Analysis was computed using PASS 13 Power Analysis and Sample Size Software (2014). NCSS, LLC. Kaysville, Utah, USA, ncss.com/software/pass.
If this trial proves the accuracy of TCB of myometrial lesion, it could provide a new diagnostic tool and significantly impact the clinical practice.
A positive study outcome could establish level A evidence for a change of international standards and implement prehabilitation into a routine clinical practice. On a national level, the study aims to standardize and improve the care for gynecological patients with sonographic atypical myometrial lesions. A primary endpoint final analysis is intended for publication in a top medical journal. The study could also provide prospective genomic characterization analyses of myometrial tumors as well as the exploratory analysis of the reliability of individual imaging methods in the preliminary selection of patients with atypical myometrial findings.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Tru cut biopsy | – | Procedure: tru cut biopsyA single arm, prospective, multicentric cohort study. A total of 250 patients is planned to be enrolled, accounting for an estimated 15% dropout rate. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- * Age ≥ 18 years * Women indicated for uterus-preserving surgery (tumour resection) or hysterectomy for myometrial lesion ('myoma-like' uterine tumour(s))
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Signed informed consent
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Women indicated for uterus-preserving surgery (tumour resection) or hysterectomy for myometrial lesion ('myoma-like' uterine tumour(s))
- USG finding of atypical myometrial lesion/s a
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- patient 's refusal
- age < 18 years
- ongoing pregnancy
- inability to perform TCB /contraindications for TCB (trombocytopenia, coagulopathy, PID, colpitis) or definitive surgery (myomectomy or hysterectomy)
- USG finding of more than 2 atypical lesion/s with a diameter ≤ 20 mm and ≥ 100 mm
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| tru cut biopsyProving that preoperative TCB could provide accurate information about the histological nature of the tumor would have great impact for setting an adequate, tailored, oncologically safe treatment approach. | Procedure or surgery | Tru cut biopsy |
Primary outcome
Rate of accuracy
Time frame: 3 years
Accuracy is defined as the concordance of the results of preoperative histology from TCB with the result of definitive histology from the operative specimen
8 secondary outcomes
Rate of adequately performed TCBs
Time frame: 3 years
Number of complications
Time frame: 3 years
Pain associated with TCB
Time frame: 24 hours
Comparison of the preoperative MRI examination to US imaging
Time frame: 3 years
Patient satisfaction with the diagnostic MRI and TCB
Time frame: 3 years
Impact of TCB on clinical management
Time frame: 3 years
Frequency of non-standard histological findings
Time frame: 3 years
Validation of the US markers of atypical myometrial lesions
Time frame: 3 years
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Jul 2024.
- Background: PubMed 32930650Abdel Wahab C, Jannot AS, Bonaffini PA, Bourillon C, Cornou C, Lefrere-Belda MA, Bats AS, Thomassin-Naggara I, Bellucci A, Reinhold C, Fournier LS. Diagnostic Algorithm to Differentiate Benign Atypical Leiomyomas from Malignant Uterine Sarcomas with Diffusion-weighted MRI. Radiology. 2020 Nov;297(2):361-371. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020191658. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
- Background: PubMed 24372487Bonneau C, Thomassin-Naggara I, Dechoux S, Cortez A, Darai E, Rouzier R. Value of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging for the characterization of uterine mesenchymal tumors. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014 Mar;93(3):261-8. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12325.
- Background: PubMed 29492599Kubik-Huch RA, Weston M, Nougaret S, Leonhardt H, Thomassin-Naggara I, Horta M, Cunha TM, Maciel C, Rockall A, Forstner R. European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) Guidelines: MR Imaging of Leiomyomas. Eur Radiol. 2018 Aug;28(8):3125-3137. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-5157-5. Epub 2018 Feb 28.
- Background: PubMed 11920533Kawamura N, Ichimura T, Ito F, Shibata S, Takahashi K, Tsujimura A, Ishiko O, Haba T, Wakasa K, Ogita S. Transcervical needle biopsy for the differential diagnosis between uterine sarcoma and leiomyoma. Cancer. 2002 Mar 15;94(6):1713-20. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10382.
- Background: PubMed 24927248Tamura R, Kashima K, Asatani M, Nishino K, Nishikawa N, Sekine M, Serikawa T, Enomoto T. Preoperative ultrasound-guided needle biopsy of 63 uterine tumors having high signal intensity upon T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2014 Jul;24(6):1042-7. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000189.
- Background: PubMed 33858675Verschuere H, Froyman W, Van den Bosch T, Van Hoefs M, Kaijser J, Van Schoubroeck D, Van Rompuy AS, Vergote I, Timmerman D. Safety and efficiency of performing transvaginal ultrasound-guided tru-cut biopsy for pelvic masses. Gynecol Oncol. 2021 Jun;161(3):845-851. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.03.026. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
- Background: PubMed 31645428Mascilini F, Quagliozzi L, Moro F, Moruzzi MC, De Blasis I, Paris V, Scambia G, Fagotti A, Testa AC. Role of transvaginal ultrasound-guided biopsy in gynecology. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 Jan;30(1):128-132. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000734. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
- Background: PubMed 32872073Wang L, Li S, Zhang Z, Jia J, Shan B. Prevalence and occult rates of uterine leiomyosarcoma. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Aug 14;99(33):e21766. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021766.
- Background: PubMed 37732472Raffone A, Raimondo D, Neola D, Travaglino A, Giorgi M, Lazzeri L, De Laurentiis F, Carravetta C, Zupi E, Seracchioli R, Casadio P, Guida M. Diagnostic accuracy of MRI in the differential diagnosis between uterine leiomyomas and sarcomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2024 Apr;165(1):22-33. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.15136. Epub 2023 Sep 21.
- Background: PubMed 37210928Knipprath-Meszaros AM, Tozzi A, Butenschon A, Reina H, Schoetzau A, Montavon C, Heinzelmann-Schwarz V, Manegold-Brauer G. High negative prediction for the Basel sarcoma score: Sonographic assessment of features suspicious of uterine sarcoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2023 Jul;174:182-189. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.05.005. Epub 2023 May 19.
- Background: PubMed 37970762De Bruyn C, Ceusters J, Vanden Brande K, Timmerman S, Froyman W, Timmerman D, Van Rompuy AS, Coosemans A, Van den Bosch T. Ultrasound features using MUSA terms and definitions in uterine sarcoma and leiomyoma: cohort study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2024 May;63(5):683-690. doi: 10.1002/uog.27535. Epub 2024 Apr 5.
- Background: PubMed 8179071Bell SW, Kempson RL, Hendrickson MR. Problematic uterine smooth muscle neoplasms. A clinicopathologic study of 213 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 1994 Jun;18(6):535-58.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Leiomyosarcoma
RecruitingPhase 1
Testing Low-Dose Common Chemotherapy (Liposomal Doxorubicin) in Combination With an Anti-Cancer Drug, Peposertib, in Advanced Sarcoma
Metastatic Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma, Metastatic Leiomyosarcoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Cabozantinib and Temozolomide for the Treatment of Unresectable or Metastatic Leiomyosarcoma or Other Soft Tissue Sarcoma
Metastatic Leiomyosarcoma, Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcoma
RecruitingObservational study
Rare Disease Patient Registry & Natural History Study - Coordination of Rare Diseases at Sanford
Rare Disorders, Undiagnosed Disorders
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
A Phase I Trial of Combination Gemcitabine and Nab-Sirolimus in Advanced Leiomyosarcomas or Advanced Soft-Tissue Sarcomas With TSC2 or TSC1 Loss-of-function Mutations or Deletions
Leiomyosarcoma, Soft-tissue Sarcomas
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study of Ivonescimab in People With Leiomyosarcoma
Leiomyosarcoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Kristyna Hlinecka principal investigator
Charles University, Czech Republic
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Leiomyosarcoma, run by Charles University, Czech Republic at 1 site in Czechia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Jul 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Czechia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Kristyna Hlinecka (+420605413210, Kristyna.Hlinecka2@vfn.cz), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Rate of accuracy (time frame: 3 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06521060, which also lists 22 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Jul 2024.