AzTrials
AzTrials

PainNCT06521619

Analysis of Postoperative Analgesic of Different Nerve Blocks for Total Knee Replacement Surgery

An observational study of Pain and Total Knee Replacement, run by Fu Jen Catholic University Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study is a retrospective analysis using the accumulated clinical database from 2017/09-2023/12 to analyze patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty and received nerve blocks. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Pain, Total Knee Replacement, Motor Function
What is being tested?
Femoral and sciatic nerve blocks
How many people
126 participants
Where
1 siteTaiwan
Study dates
26 Jun 2024to 31 Jul 2024
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Inclusion Criteria: * Patient receiving general anesthesia combined with nerve blocks for total knee replacement

Who may be able to join

  • Patient receiving general anesthesia combined with nerve blocks for total knee replacement

Who cannot join

  • Age less than 20 years old
  • Not receiving nerve blocks
  • American society of anesthesiologist physical status class greater than 4
  • Contraindicated to receiving nerve blocks

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Taiwan1 site
  • Fu Jen Catholic University Hospital

    New Taipei City, 24300

Other trials in Taiwan

About this study

Official title: Analysis of Postoperative Analgesic Effect and Complications Among Different Approaches of Nerve Block for Total Knee Replacement Surgery

This study is a retrospective analysis using the accumulated clinical database from 2017/09-2023/12 to analyze patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty and received nerve blocks. The aim is to compare the analgesic effects, incidence of nerve injury, and rate of chronic pain under different nerve block techniques.

Read the detailed description

Protocol title: Analysis of postoperative analgesic effect and complications among different approaches of nerve block for total knee replacement surgery Objectives: There is no consensus on the optimal nerve block choice for knee joint replacement. Therefore, the aim of this study is to conduct a retrospective analysis using data from patients who underwent total knee replacement (TKR) and received nerve blocks at our hospital. This study will investigate the postoperative analgesic consumption, duration of pain relief, motor function block, complications, and patient satisfaction for different nerve block techniques. The goal of this project is to identify the optimal nerve block choice to benefit future patients undergoing knee joint replacement.

Background: After undergoing total knee replacement (TKR), patients need rehabilitation to restore knee function and reduce postoperative adhesions. However, pain often prevents them from achieving this goal. Clinically, nerve block anesthesia is gradually becoming mainstream, as it achieves intraoperative anesthesia and postoperative analgesia by infiltrating local anesthetics into the nerves supplying the knee joint. According to a study by Allen et al. (1998), patients receiving nerve blocks such as femoral and sciatic nerve blocks experienced better pain relief within the first 8 hours postoperatively and had a 50% reduction in total morphine consumption on the second postoperative day compared to those who received spinal anesthesia alone. Carli et al. (2010) found that patients who received femoral nerve blocks used less postoperative patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) and had better postoperative motor function recovery compared to those who received periarticular anesthetic infiltration.

Currently, there are various types of nerve block techniques, including femoral nerve, obturator nerve, adductor canal nerve, and sciatic nerve blocks. Different nerve block techniques result in varying analgesic efficacy, duration, functional impact, motor block, and complications. Sharma et al. (2010) indicated that femoral nerve blocks might cause quadriceps muscle weakness and patient falls. Kinghorn et al. (2012) also reported that sciatic nerve blocks might result in foot drop.

Study Design: This study is a retrospective analysis using the accumulated clinical database from 2017/09-2023/12 to analyze patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty and received nerve blocks. The aim is to compare the analgesic effects, incidence of nerve injury, and rate of chronic pain under different nerve block techniques.

Methods: A. Evaluation Methods: Data is collected in a patient registry called "acute pain service" (APS), which is the medical record for documenting the dose of patient controlled analgesia and side effects of PCA or nerve blocks.

  1. Duration of Pain Relief: Ask patients when they started to feel pain (duration).
  2. Quantitative Assessment of Analgesic Effectiveness: Patients receiving nerve blocks will also use intra-venous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) for 2 days postoperatively. The total amount of medication used in the PCA machine over these 2 days will reflect the patient's pain level.
  3. Pain: VAS score ii. Motor Block Assessment: The motor function of patients who received nerve blocks will be evaluated for abnormalities the day after surgery. Motor block will be assessed using the Modified Bromage Motor Blockade Score. c. Complication Statistics: Defined as conditions like foot drop, quadriceps muscle weakness, or any situation requiring special medical treatment.
Being tested
Femoral and sciatic nerve blocks
Keywords
Analgesia, Nerve block, Total knee replacement
Medical subject headings
Pain, Agnosia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Femoral and sciatic nerve blocksProcedure or surgery

    Also called Adductor canal block and infiltration of posterior capsule of knee

    Patients receiving Adductor canal block and infiltration of posterior capsule of knee

Study groups in NCT06521619
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Patient receiving Sciatic and Femoral nerve blocksPatient receiving Sciatic and Femoral nerve blocks
Receives: Procedure: Femoral and sciatic nerve blocks
Patient receiving Adductor canal block and infiltration of posterior capsule of kneePatient receiving Adductor canal block and infiltration of posterior capsule of knee

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Acute postoperative pain

    Acute postoperative pain

    Measured: Up to two days after surgery

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Range of motion

    Knee passive range of motion

    Measured: Up to two days after surgery

  2. Analgesic consumption

    PCA dose consumption

    Measured: Up to two days after surgery

  3. Ambulation time

    Time to first ambulation

    Measured: Up to two days after surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Jul 2024
  2. Study start26 Jun 2024
  3. Primary completion31 Jul 2024
  4. Study completion31 Jul 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
126 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06521619
Sponsor's protocol ID
FJUH113365
Status last verified
Feb 2026
First submitted
22 Jul 2024
Last updated
17 Feb 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: Patient data is protected under privacy guidelines of our institute and the need of original patient data could be obtained by written mail request to study officials and the request would be reviewed by our institute.

Publications

  • Sung CH, Liu JH, Hung CF, Fu CH. Comparative analysis of adductor canal block combined with iPACK block versus femoral combined with sciatic nerve blocks: a propensity score matched study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 May 16;25(1):249. doi: 10.1186/s12871-025-03112-z.

    PubMed 40380131

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Pain and Total Knee Replacement, run by Fu Jen Catholic University Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Acute postoperative pain (time frame: Up to two days after surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06521619, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Feb 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in