PainNCT06521619
Analysis of Postoperative Analgesic of Different Nerve Blocks for Total Knee Replacement Surgery
An observational study of Pain and Total Knee Replacement, run by Fu Jen Catholic University Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.
Trial summary
This study is a retrospective analysis using the accumulated clinical database from 2017/09-2023/12 to analyze patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty and received nerve blocks. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Pain, Total Knee Replacement, Motor Function
- What is being tested?
- Femoral and sciatic nerve blocks
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 126 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTaiwan
- Study dates
- 26 Jun 2024to 31 Jul 2024
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Inclusion Criteria: * Patient receiving general anesthesia combined with nerve blocks for total knee replacement
Who may be able to join
- Patient receiving general anesthesia combined with nerve blocks for total knee replacement
Who cannot join
- Age less than 20 years old
- Not receiving nerve blocks
- American society of anesthesiologist physical status class greater than 4
- Contraindicated to receiving nerve blocks
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Analysis of Postoperative Analgesic Effect and Complications Among Different Approaches of Nerve Block for Total Knee Replacement Surgery
This study is a retrospective analysis using the accumulated clinical database from 2017/09-2023/12 to analyze patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty and received nerve blocks. The aim is to compare the analgesic effects, incidence of nerve injury, and rate of chronic pain under different nerve block techniques.
Read the detailed description
Protocol title: Analysis of postoperative analgesic effect and complications among different approaches of nerve block for total knee replacement surgery Objectives: There is no consensus on the optimal nerve block choice for knee joint replacement. Therefore, the aim of this study is to conduct a retrospective analysis using data from patients who underwent total knee replacement (TKR) and received nerve blocks at our hospital. This study will investigate the postoperative analgesic consumption, duration of pain relief, motor function block, complications, and patient satisfaction for different nerve block techniques. The goal of this project is to identify the optimal nerve block choice to benefit future patients undergoing knee joint replacement.
Background: After undergoing total knee replacement (TKR), patients need rehabilitation to restore knee function and reduce postoperative adhesions. However, pain often prevents them from achieving this goal. Clinically, nerve block anesthesia is gradually becoming mainstream, as it achieves intraoperative anesthesia and postoperative analgesia by infiltrating local anesthetics into the nerves supplying the knee joint. According to a study by Allen et al. (1998), patients receiving nerve blocks such as femoral and sciatic nerve blocks experienced better pain relief within the first 8 hours postoperatively and had a 50% reduction in total morphine consumption on the second postoperative day compared to those who received spinal anesthesia alone. Carli et al. (2010) found that patients who received femoral nerve blocks used less postoperative patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) and had better postoperative motor function recovery compared to those who received periarticular anesthetic infiltration.
Currently, there are various types of nerve block techniques, including femoral nerve, obturator nerve, adductor canal nerve, and sciatic nerve blocks. Different nerve block techniques result in varying analgesic efficacy, duration, functional impact, motor block, and complications. Sharma et al. (2010) indicated that femoral nerve blocks might cause quadriceps muscle weakness and patient falls. Kinghorn et al. (2012) also reported that sciatic nerve blocks might result in foot drop.
Study Design: This study is a retrospective analysis using the accumulated clinical database from 2017/09-2023/12 to analyze patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty and received nerve blocks. The aim is to compare the analgesic effects, incidence of nerve injury, and rate of chronic pain under different nerve block techniques.
Methods: A. Evaluation Methods: Data is collected in a patient registry called "acute pain service" (APS), which is the medical record for documenting the dose of patient controlled analgesia and side effects of PCA or nerve blocks.
- Duration of Pain Relief: Ask patients when they started to feel pain (duration).
- Quantitative Assessment of Analgesic Effectiveness: Patients receiving nerve blocks will also use intra-venous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) for 2 days postoperatively. The total amount of medication used in the PCA machine over these 2 days will reflect the patient's pain level.
- Pain: VAS score ii. Motor Block Assessment: The motor function of patients who received nerve blocks will be evaluated for abnormalities the day after surgery. Motor block will be assessed using the Modified Bromage Motor Blockade Score. c. Complication Statistics: Defined as conditions like foot drop, quadriceps muscle weakness, or any situation requiring special medical treatment.
- Conditions
- Pain, Total Knee Replacement, Motor Function
- Being tested
- Femoral and sciatic nerve blocks
- Keywords
- Analgesia, Nerve block, Total knee replacement
- Medical subject headings
- Pain, Agnosia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Femoral and sciatic nerve blocksProcedure or surgery
Also called Adductor canal block and infiltration of posterior capsule of knee
Patients receiving Adductor canal block and infiltration of posterior capsule of knee
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Patient receiving Sciatic and Femoral nerve blocks | Patient receiving Sciatic and Femoral nerve blocks Receives: Procedure: Femoral and sciatic nerve blocks | |
| Patient receiving Adductor canal block and infiltration of posterior capsule of knee | Patient receiving Adductor canal block and infiltration of posterior capsule of knee |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Acute postoperative pain
Acute postoperative pain
Measured: Up to two days after surgery
Secondary outcomes (3)
Range of motion
Knee passive range of motion
Measured: Up to two days after surgery
Analgesic consumption
PCA dose consumption
Measured: Up to two days after surgery
Ambulation time
Time to first ambulation
Measured: Up to two days after surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Jul 2024
- Study start26 Jun 2024
- Primary completion31 Jul 2024
- Study completion31 Jul 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 126 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Fu Jen Catholic University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Sung, Chao-Hsien, Fu Jen Catholic University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06521619
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- FJUH113365
- Status last verified
- Feb 2026
- First submitted
- 22 Jul 2024
- Last updated
- 17 Feb 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Patient data is protected under privacy guidelines of our institute and the need of original patient data could be obtained by written mail request to study officials and the request would be reviewed by our institute.
Publications
Sung CH, Liu JH, Hung CF, Fu CH. Comparative analysis of adductor canal block combined with iPACK block versus femoral combined with sciatic nerve blocks: a propensity score matched study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 May 16;25(1):249. doi: 10.1186/s12871-025-03112-z.
PubMed 40380131
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Feb 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Analysis of Postoperative Analgesic Effect and Complications Among Different Approaches of Nerve Block for Total Knee Replacement Surgery
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06521619
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- FJUH113365
- Conditions
- Pain, Total Knee Replacement, Motor Function
- Keywords
- Analgesia, Nerve block, Total knee replacement
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 126 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Fu Jen Catholic University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 26 Jun 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Jul 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Jul 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 Jul 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is a retrospective analysis using the accumulated clinical database from 2017/09-2023/12 to analyze patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty and received nerve blocks. The aim is to compare the analgesic effects, incidence of nerve injury, and rate of chronic pain under different nerve block techniques.
Detailed description
Protocol title: Analysis of postoperative analgesic effect and complications among different approaches of nerve block for total knee replacement surgery Objectives: There is no consensus on the optimal nerve block choice for knee joint replacement. Therefore, the aim of this study is to conduct a retrospective analysis using data from patients who underwent total knee replacement (TKR) and received nerve blocks at our hospital. This study will investigate the postoperative analgesic consumption, duration of pain relief, motor function block, complications, and patient satisfaction for different nerve block techniques. The goal of this project is to identify the optimal nerve block choice to benefit future patients undergoing knee joint replacement.
Background: After undergoing total knee replacement (TKR), patients need rehabilitation to restore knee function and reduce postoperative adhesions. However, pain often prevents them from achieving this goal. Clinically, nerve block anesthesia is gradually becoming mainstream, as it achieves intraoperative anesthesia and postoperative analgesia by infiltrating local anesthetics into the nerves supplying the knee joint. According to a study by Allen et al. (1998), patients receiving nerve blocks such as femoral and sciatic nerve blocks experienced better pain relief within the first 8 hours postoperatively and had a 50% reduction in total morphine consumption on the second postoperative day compared to those who received spinal anesthesia alone. Carli et al. (2010) found that patients who received femoral nerve blocks used less postoperative patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) and had better postoperative motor function recovery compared to those who received periarticular anesthetic infiltration.
Currently, there are various types of nerve block techniques, including femoral nerve, obturator nerve, adductor canal nerve, and sciatic nerve blocks. Different nerve block techniques result in varying analgesic efficacy, duration, functional impact, motor block, and complications. Sharma et al. (2010) indicated that femoral nerve blocks might cause quadriceps muscle weakness and patient falls. Kinghorn et al. (2012) also reported that sciatic nerve blocks might result in foot drop.
Study Design: This study is a retrospective analysis using the accumulated clinical database from 2017/09-2023/12 to analyze patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty and received nerve blocks. The aim is to compare the analgesic effects, incidence of nerve injury, and rate of chronic pain under different nerve block techniques.
Methods: A. Evaluation Methods: Data is collected in a patient registry called "acute pain service" (APS), which is the medical record for documenting the dose of patient controlled analgesia and side effects of PCA or nerve blocks.
- Duration of Pain Relief: Ask patients when they started to feel pain (duration).
- Quantitative Assessment of Analgesic Effectiveness: Patients receiving nerve blocks will also use intra-venous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) for 2 days postoperatively. The total amount of medication used in the PCA machine over these 2 days will reflect the patient's pain level.
- Pain: VAS score ii. Motor Block Assessment: The motor function of patients who received nerve blocks will be evaluated for abnormalities the day after surgery. Motor block will be assessed using the Modified Bromage Motor Blockade Score. c. Complication Statistics: Defined as conditions like foot drop, quadriceps muscle weakness, or any situation requiring special medical treatment.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Patient receiving Sciatic and Femoral nerve blocks | – | Procedure: Femoral and sciatic nerve blocksPatient receiving Sciatic and Femoral nerve blocks |
| Patient receiving Adductor canal block and infiltration of posterior capsule of knee | – | –Patient receiving Adductor canal block and infiltration of posterior capsule of knee |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Inclusion Criteria: * Patient receiving general anesthesia combined with nerve blocks for total knee replacement
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patient receiving general anesthesia combined with nerve blocks for total knee replacement
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Age less than 20 years old
- Not receiving nerve blocks
- American society of anesthesiologist physical status class greater than 4
- Contraindicated to receiving nerve blocks
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Femoral and sciatic nerve blocksAlso: Adductor canal block and infiltration of posterior capsule of kneePatients receiving Adductor canal block and infiltration of posterior capsule of knee | Procedure or surgery | Patient receiving Sciatic and Femoral nerve blocks |
Primary outcome
Acute postoperative pain
Time frame: Up to two days after surgery
Acute postoperative pain
3 secondary outcomes
Range of motion
Time frame: Up to two days after surgery
Analgesic consumption
Time frame: Up to two days after surgery
Ambulation time
Time frame: Up to two days after surgery
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Feb 2026.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40380131Sung CH, Liu JH, Hung CF, Fu CH. Comparative analysis of adductor canal block combined with iPACK block versus femoral combined with sciatic nerve blocks: a propensity score matched study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 May 16;25(1):249. doi: 10.1186/s12871-025-03112-z.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Patient data is protected under privacy guidelines of our institute and the need of original patient data could be obtained by written mail request to study officials and the request would be reviewed by our institute.
Related trials for Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Stress Ball Use During Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal After Coronary Angiography
Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal, Stress Ball
Recruiting
Empowered Relief® for Cancer Survivors With Chronic Pain
Chronic Pain Due to Cancer, Pain Catastrophizing
RecruitingPhase 4
ESP Blocks for Posterior Spinal Fusion
Postoperative Pain
RecruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotypes in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Hip Hinge Exercises on Pain, Range of Motion and Functional Disability in Non-specific Low Back Pain.
Low Back Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Pain and Total Knee Replacement, run by Fu Jen Catholic University Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Acute postoperative pain (time frame: Up to two days after surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06521619, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Feb 2026.