AzTrials
AzTrials

Schizophrenic PatientsNCT06547996

Effects of tES Combined With Retrieval Practice on Semantic Memory in Patients With Schizophrenia

A study testing tES-tDCS group and tES-tACS group in people with Schizophrenic Patients, run by Northeast Normal University at 1 site in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The semantic processing deficit stands as a central feature of cognitive abnormalities in schizophrenia. Both transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) and retrieval practice have been demonstrated as external techniques capable of ameliorating the semantic processing deficit in individuals with schizophrenia. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 60 years
Conditions the study is for
Schizophrenic Patients
What is being tested?
tES-tDCS group and tES-tACS group
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
72 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
30 Aug 2024to 30 Oct 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 60 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Meeting the diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5);
  • Aged 18 years or older, regardless of gender, with an educational level of elementary school or above;
  • All patients received stable-level antipsychotic medication treatment, were in a stable phase of disease treatment, able to understand the testing requirements, and cooperated to complete all research tasks;
  • No history of neurological disorders or other serious physical illnesses, and no history of intellectual disability;
  • No color blindness, color weakness, or other color vision impairments, with normal vision or corrected vision.

Who cannot join

  • Clear cognitive impairment caused by somatic or cerebral organic lesions, such as cerebrovascular diseases, traumatic brain injury, etc;
  • Individuals with mental disorders caused by substance dependence or abuse, or the use of psychoactive substances;
  • History of brain injury or other central nervous system-related organic diseases;
  • Individuals at significant risk of suicide or harming others;
  • Participation in similar experiments in the past 30 days prior to baseline.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • Northwest Normal University

    Lanzhou, Gansu, 730070

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Effects of Transcranial Electrical Stimulation Combined With Retrieval Practice on Semantic Memory in Patients With Schizophrenia

The semantic processing deficit stands as a central feature of cognitive abnormalities in schizophrenia. Both transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) and retrieval practice have been demonstrated as external techniques capable of ameliorating the semantic processing deficit in individuals with schizophrenia. The inquiry examines whether the combined effect of tES and retrieval practice, following tES intervention targeting the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (L-DLPFC) in patients with schizophrenia, contributes to the preservation of semantic memory in these individuals.

Investigators plan to recruit 60 patients diagnosed with schizophrenia from hospitals. Treatment is administered by two examiners, each patient receives transcranial electrical stimulation(2mA×20min) with simultaneous learning of word lists. Each participant of each stimulation type was involved in both learning conditions, meaning that all participants completed both retrieval and restudy learning and testing Subsequently, Investigators observed their immediate and delayed memory performance through tests.

Read the detailed description
  1. Stimulation phase: In the tDCS group, the anode was placed over the left DLPFC (F3), and the cathode was placed over the contralateral supraorbital area (FP2). A direct current of 2mA was applied for 20 minutes during each stimulation session. In the tACS group, the anode was placed in the F3 region of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), and the cathode was placed in the right supraorbital region (Fp2), and the current used was 2 mA AC at 40 Hz, with a stimulation time of 20 min. In the sham group, the stimulation parameters, including the stimulation site and duration, were identical to those of the anodal group. However, during the 10-second ramp-up and ramp-down periods before and after stimulation, patients were unaware that the current was turned off.
  2. Learning phase: The experimental procedure followed the classic retrieval practice paradigm, which included a learning phase and a final test phase. During the experiment, participants were informed that they would learn two lists of words. Subsequently, they might either learn the words again or complete a list recall test, and will be given a final test shortly thereafter. The learning of the retrieval practice list and the restudy list was conducted in a randomly balanced manner. Each word was presented for 5 seconds, with a 500-millisecond interval between words. To avoid providing secondary retrieval cues between examples, all words were shuffled pseudo-randomly within categories. Each list contained 17 words, consisting of 5 examples from each of the 3 experimental categories (15 experimental examples, 2 filler examples). The first and last words presented in each list were filler words, thus controlling for the primacy and recency effects on memory. For the retrieval practice list, participants underwent two learning sessions and two retrieval sessions (S-T-S-T). During retrieval, participants were instructed to write down all the words they had just remembered within 5 minutes. For the restudy list, participants underwent four study sessions (S-S-S-S). Between each learning cycle, participants completed a 3-minute simple arithmetic task (dispersed attention task).
  3. Testing phase:

Immediate Test: Participants were instructed to recall as many words as possible from the learned lists within 10 minutes after completing all learning tasks.

Delayed Test: Participants were informed to recall as many words as possible from the learned lists within 10 minutes 24 hours later.

Being tested
tES-tDCS group, tES-tACS group, tES-sham group

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • tES-tDCS groupDevice

    2mA/20mins/session

  • tES-tACS groupDevice

    2mA/40Hz/20mins/session

  • tES-sham groupDevice

    0mA/20mins/session

Study groups in NCT06547996
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
tDCS groupExperimentalIn the tDCS group, the anode was placed over the left DLPFC (F3), and the cathode was placed over the contralateral supraorbital area (FP2). A direct current of 2mA was applied for 20 minutes during each stimulation session.
Receives: Device: tES-tDCS group
tACS groupExperimentalIn the tACS group, the anode was placed in the F3 region of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), and the cathode was placed in the right supraorbital region (Fp2), and the current used was 2 mA AC at 40 Hz, with a stimulation time of 20 min.
Receives: Device: tES-tACS group
sham groupSham comparatorIn the sham group, the stimulation parameters, including the stimulation site and duration, were identical to those of the anodal group. However, during the 10-second ramp-up and ramp-down periods before and after stimulation, patients were unaware that the current was turned off.
Receives: Device: tES-sham group

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The correct recall rate of word lists

    The correct recall rate of word lists was calculated for each subject by the experimental assistant.

    Measured: Immediate Test: 5minutes; Delayed Test: 24 hours

  2. Adjusted Ratio of Clustering (ARC)

    Free recall organization was measured by the Adjusted Ratio of Clustering (ARC) scores. ARC scores range from 1 to 1. A 0 score indicates a level of clustering similar to what would be expected by chance, and a score of 1 implies perfect clustering. Negative values of ARC scores mean atypical and uninterpretable recall patterns. For that reason, negative scores were excluded from analyses.

    Measured: Immediate Test: 5minutes; Delayed Test: 24 hours

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Aug 2024
  2. Study start30 Aug 2024
  3. Primary completion30 Sep 2024
  4. Study completion30 Oct 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
72 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06547996
Sponsor's protocol ID
No.2023025
Status last verified
Nov 2024
First submitted
3 Aug 2024
Last updated
15 Nov 2024
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Hoy KE, Whitty D, Bailey N, Fitzgerald PB. Preliminary investigation of the effects of gamma-tACS on working memory in schizophrenia. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2016 Oct;123(10):1205-12. doi: 10.1007/s00702-016-1554-1. Epub 2016 Apr 26.

    PubMed 27116682
  • Sreeraj VS, Shivakumar V, Sowmya S, Bose A, Nawani H, Narayanaswamy JC, Venkatasubramanian G. Online Theta Frequency Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation for Cognitive Remediation in Schizophrenia: A Case Report and Review of Literature. J ECT. 2019 Jun;35(2):139-143. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0000000000000523.

    PubMed 30024457
  • Marko M, Cimrova B, Riecansky I. Neural theta oscillations support semantic memory retrieval. Sci Rep. 2019 Nov 27;9(1):17667. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-53813-y.

    PubMed 31776375
  • Javadi AH, Cheng P. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) enhances reconsolidation of long-term memory. Brain Stimul. 2013 Jul;6(4):668-74. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2012.10.007. Epub 2012 Oct 31.

    PubMed 23137702
  • Crossman M, Bartl G, Soerum R, Sandrini M. Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation over the posterior parietal cortex on episodic memory reconsolidation. Cortex. 2019 Dec;121:78-88. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.08.009. Epub 2019 Aug 28.

    PubMed 31550617
  • McKay AP, McKenna PJ, Bentham P, Mortimer AM, Holbery A, Hodges JR. Semantic memory is impaired in schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry. 1996 Jun 1;39(11):929-37. doi: 10.1016/0006-3223(95)00250-2.

    PubMed 9162204

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing tES-tDCS group and tES-tACS group in people with Schizophrenic Patients, run by Northeast Normal University at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Nov 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The correct recall rate of word lists (time frame: Immediate Test: 5minutes; Delayed Test: 24 hours). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06547996, which also lists 6 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Nov 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in