AzTrials
AzTrials

Air Leak From LungNCT06548386

Feasibility and Accuracy of a Novel Pleural Drain Gas Analyzer in Detecting Air Leaks

A study testing Pleural gas analysis in people with Air Leak From Lung and Pneumothorax, run by Lung Healing Technologies Inc at 1 site in United States.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this study is to assess the clinical feasibility of a novel, reusable, low cost gas analyzer that detects breath in chest drains in order to diagnose and heal air leaks. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Air Leak From Lung, Pneumothorax
What is being tested?
Pleural gas analysis
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
33 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
5 Feb 2025to Jun 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients who are scheduled for thoracic surgery and expected to have chest tube placed
  • For patients who are unable to sign consent, but meet all of the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria, a legally appointed representative (LAR) will be allowed to sign consent for that patient
  • Patients that provide informed consent for the study
  • Patients \>18 years old

Who cannot join

  • Patients with hemodynamic instability
  • Pregnant patients
  • Prisoners
  • Individuals who are not yet adults

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

United States1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Endeavor Health

    Evanston, Illinois, 60201

    Kanwal Zeeshan

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

The goal of this study is to assess the clinical feasibility of a novel, reusable, low cost gas analyzer that detects breath in chest drains in order to diagnose and heal air leaks. The investigators have developed prototype gas analyzers that attach to the outlet of any analog chest drain, and can be connected temporarily to the sampling port. They detect breath by measuring CO2, O2, and pressure, in order to supplement the information provided by the bubbles in the water seal.

Read the detailed description

Tests on patients in 2013 at Northwestern demonstrated that gas analysis can help diagnose and heal air leaks by detecting breath in chest drains, as documented in the investigator's patents and peer-reviewed publications. CO2 is 100 times higher in the lung than ambient, and O2 the same amount lower in ppm. The length of time that it takes to detect breath at the outlet is related to the size of the air leak. O2 is available next to every bed, often used in recovery, and when high O2 is quickly detected at the sampling port, the only source can be an active air leak.

The primary aim is to assess whether the device can accurately measure changes in gas flow from an analog pleural drain and whether this accurately detects pleural air leaks.

Specific aim 1: To determine whether the gas analyzer device can measure changes in exhaled gas levels and if this can distinguish true air leaks from false air leaks.

Sub aim 1: Assess how patient characteristics such as extent of resection, pre-existing conditions such as COD, lung function test, etc, affect the efficacy of the device.

Specific aim 2: Compare the accuracy of pleural air leak measured via gas analysis to the accuracy of pleural air leak detection as measured by standard VI.

The hypothesis is that the prototype pleural gas analyzer, through detection of carbon dioxide and oxygen levels, can distinguish true air leaks from false air leaks more accurately than the traditionally practiced method of Visual Inspection of bubbles in the chest drainage unit (VI).

Study Endpoints:

The primary end point of this study is detection of air leak, either by VI or prototype pleural gas analysis.

True Air Leak Definition:

  1. Both visual inspection and pleural gas analysis demonstrate an air leak
  2. Development of a pneumothorax at any point up to 4 weeks after chest tube removal
  3. Pneumothorax develops during a clamp trial to assess for true air leak (failed clamp trial)
  4. Patient discharged home with chest tube due to clinical concern (even in absence of clamp trial) of ongoing air leak
  5. Development of clinically significant subcutaneous emphysema either with a chest tube in place or after chest tube removal (defined as an increase beyond initial post op, observable to patient or care team) Secondary endpoint is comparison in accuracy in detection of air leak between VI and gas analysis.
Being tested
Pleural gas analysis
Keywords
alveolopleural fistula
Medical subject headings
Pneumothorax

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Pleural gas analysisDevice

    Patients enrolled in this study will undergo both VI and pleural gas analysis to assess for air leak following surgical chest tube placement.

    For pleural gas analysis, an outlet gas analyzer will be kept on the outlet port of the chest drain for the entire duration of time that a chest tube is in place. We plan to collect both continuous data, looking for intermittent spikes and gas changes, along with episodic data collected during specific air leak assessments. The gas analyzer may better be able to measure an air leak during these specific procedures conducted twice per day, but it will also be used at the outlet port of the chest drain the rest of the time to continuously check for an air leak throughout the hospital stay.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Accuracy alone

    Whether gas analysis can accurately assess for air leak

    Measured: One year

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Using VI as well

    Comparison of accuracy in air leak assessment between gas analysis and visual inspection

    Measured: One year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Aug 2024
  2. Study start5 Feb 2025
  3. Primary completionJan 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJun 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
33 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06548386
Sponsor's protocol ID
STUDY00000003
Status last verified
Sep 2025
First submitted
8 Aug 2024
Last updated
9 Sep 2025
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Pleural gas analysis in people with Air Leak From Lung and Pneumothorax, run by Lung Healing Technologies Inc at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Sep 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Dan Dodd (3033242264, ddodd@lunghealingtechnologies.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Accuracy alone (time frame: One year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Sep 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in