Muscle ArchitectureNCT06573879
Effect of Eccentric Exercise on Musculus Triceps Surae Muscle Architecture, Muscle Strength, and Performance
A study testing Eccentric Exercise in people with Muscle Architecture, run by Medipol University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
This study investigates the architecture, muscle strength, and performance of skeletal muscles. Skeletal muscles constitute a mass of muscle fascicles connected to bones via tendons. Muscle architecture is defined as the geometric arrangement of muscle fiber bundles in relation to the axis that generates force. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 14 to 18 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Muscle Architecture
- What is being tested?
- Eccentric Exercise
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 1 Nov 2023to 22 Mar 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 14 to 18 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Having healthy lower extremities
- Being a volleyball athlete for at least the last 5 years
- Full range of motion in the lower extremity
Who cannot join
- Systemic inflammatory joint disease for both groups
- Having had an acute or chronic lower extremity injury during the last 6 months
- Having any orthopedic disorder in the lower extremity
- Severe pain or limitation of movement in the lower extremity
- Previous lower extremity surgery
- Participant noncompliance during testing
- Presence of severe effusion and severe limitation in joint movement
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
Istanbul Medipol University
Istanbul, Kavacık, 34815
About this study
Official title: Effect of Eccentric Exercise on Musculus Triceps Surae Muscle Architecture, Muscle Strength, and Performance in Young Volleyball Players
This study investigates the architecture, muscle strength, and performance of skeletal muscles. Skeletal muscles constitute a mass of muscle fascicles connected to bones via tendons. Muscle architecture is defined as the geometric arrangement of muscle fiber bundles in relation to the axis that generates force. This arrangement influences the muscle's contraction speed, force generation capacity, and range of motion. Ultrasonography is a method for examining muscle morphology without radiation exposure. The architectural features of muscles have been a proven method for evaluating and enhancing muscle function. The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of eight weeks of eccentric exercises on the right and left triceps surae muscles in young volleyball players. This investigation aims to contribute to the literature concerning muscle architecture. The study will be conducted using statistical analysis and the SPSS program.
The study has obtained ethical approval and will be conducted at Istanbul Medipol University. Thirty healthy young volleyball players will be involved in this research. The participants' muscle architecture, strength, and performance will be measured. Additionally, the impact of eccentric exercises will be examined, and statistical data analysis will be carried out.
Ultimately, this study aims to explore the effects of eccentric exercise on the muscle architecture and performance of young volleyball players, aiming to contribute to the literature by understanding and enhancing muscle function and performance.
Read the detailed description
Skeletal muscles are organized masses of muscle fascicles covered with connective tissue, attached to bones at both ends through tendons. The volume of a muscle is largely determined by the total number of sarcomeres within that muscle. Sarcomeres are approximately 1 µm in diameter and 2-3 µm in length. These functional units are aligned end-to-end to form myofibrils, which are packed parallel to create muscle fibers (approximately 50 µm in diameter in humans). Bundling these muscle fibers in parallel forms fascicles (approximately 1 to 3 mm in diameter in humans), which, in turn, combine in parallel to create muscles.
Muscle architecture is defined as the geometric arrangement of muscle fiber bundles concerning the axis that generates force. Muscles with fibers extending longitudinally along the muscle length possess longitudinal muscle architecture, while muscles with fibers running at a certain angle along the muscle length and containing shorter fibers possess pennate or multipennate muscle architecture.
This arrangement affects a muscle's contraction speed, force generation capacity, and range of motion known as 'excursion'. In pennate muscles, bundles of fibers, referred to as fascicles, are positioned obliquely and attach to the muscle's aponeuroses. The angle at which a fascicle attaches to the aponeurosis defines the pennation angle. The distance between epimysiums (superficial and deep aponeuroses in ultrasonography) defines the anatomical muscle thickness. These parameters of skeletal muscle architecture are measured through muscle physiology and biomechanical studies to determine the anatomical and contractile characteristics of the muscles. Typical parameters included in architectural analysis are fiber length, pennation angle, and physiological cross-sectional area.
Ultrasonography enables the examination of muscle morphology without radiation exposure. Fascicle length, pennation angle, and muscle thickness can be measured in vivo using two-dimensional (2D) B-mode ultrasonography. In ultrasonographic imaging, normal muscle tissue appears as a structure with low echo intensity. As the epimysium surrounding the muscle is quite reflective, the muscle's boundaries are clearly visible.
While skeletal muscles show significant structural similarities at a microscopic level, muscle architecture is the fundamental factor creating differences in strength and functional capabilities. Understanding the architectural features of muscles allows for the effective assessment and improvement of muscle function. Loading placed on muscles results in an adaptive process leading to muscle development. Muscle architecture allows the macroscopic understanding and interpretation of this adaptation process.
Although muscle strength is primarily determined by genetic structure, it is also influenced by factors such as the level of physical activity, age, gender, motivation, and nutrition. The magnitude of the cross-sectional area of a muscle - which includes the number of engaged fibrils and the size of these fibrils - accounts for the muscle's strength. Developing these aspects is achievable through exercise.
Exercise is defined as a planned, structured, intentional, and continuous activity aimed at enhancing physical fitness. Strength training exercises are designed to increase muscle strength and endurance by applying resistance.
One type of exercise, eccentric exercises, involves movements against gravity using body weight or additional loads. Eccentric exercises are utilized to increase muscle strength and mass. More muscle strength can be generated through these exercises compared to concentric or isometric exercises. Due to their features in injury prevention, rehabilitation, and improving physical fitness in healthy individuals, eccentric training has become quite popular. However, findings regarding the effects of eccentric training on the m. triceps surae are contradictory. Some studies show that eccentric training promotes an increase in muscle fiber length, pennation angle, and muscle thickness, while others find no changes in these architectural outcomes. This might be due to the non-uniform distribution of loads among synergistic muscles and the observation of different mechanical loads for different components of the m. triceps surae. Additionally, short muscle fibers are more sensitive to muscle damage caused by eccentric training compared to long muscle fibers. Considering the differences in architectural features of m. triceps surae segments (GM, GL, SO, and PL), eccentric exercises may produce different results.
The aim of the study is to investigate the effects of 8 weeks of eccentric exercises, performed three times a week for a total of 24 sessions, on the muscle architecture of the m. triceps surae in healthy female participants. Ultrasonography will be utilized to measure fascicle length, pennation angle, and muscle thickness in the gastrocnemius medialis (GM), gastrocnemius lateralis (GL), soleus (SO), and plantaris (PL) muscles before and after the exercise program. It is hypothesized that an 8-week eccentric exercise program will increase fascicle length, pennation angle, and muscle thickness in the m. triceps surae muscles. The architectural adaptations to eccentric exercises must be understood to develop effective exercise programs for improving muscle strength and function.
- Conditions
- Muscle Architecture
- Being tested
- Eccentric Exercise
- Keywords
- Muscle architecture, Muscle strength, Jumping performance
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Eccentric ExerciseBehavioural
It was investigated whether volleyball athlete participants would develop muscle architecture, muscle strength and performance parameters differently from the control group by performing eccentric exercises in addition to their exercise routines.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Exercise Group (EG) | Experimental | Exercise Group (EG) is the first arm of the study in which volleyball athlete participants performed eccentric exercises in addition to their exercise routines. Receives: Behavioral: Eccentric Exercise |
| Control Group (CG) | No intervention | Control Group (CG) is the second arm of the study, where volleyball athletes only continued their exercise routines and no external intervention was made. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Muscle Architecture- muscle thickness
Muscle architecture of the gastrocnemius medialis, lateralis, and soleus muscles are visualized by the USG device.
Their muscle thickness (mm) is measured and recorded.
Measured: 5 months
Muscle Architecture- fiber length
Muscle architecture of the gastrocnemius medialis, lateralis and soleus muscles are visualized by the USG device.
Their fiber length (mm) is measured and recorded.
Measured: 5 months
Muscle Architecture- pennation angle (degree)
Muscle architecture of the gastrocnemius medialis, lateralis and soleus muscles are visualized by the USG device.
Their pennation angle (degree) is measured and recorded.
Measured: 5 months
Performance measurement- Single-leg hop test
Single-leg hop tests are implemented. Right and left hop results are recorded in cm.
Measured: 5 months
Performance measurement- vertical jump tests
Vertical jump tests are implemented. Results are recorded in cm.
Measured: 5 months
Muscle force measurement
The strength of the gastrocnemius medialis, lateralis and soleus muscles is measured and recorded in Newtons.
Measured: 5 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Aug 2024
- Study start1 Nov 2023
- Primary completion19 Jan 2024
- Study completion22 Mar 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (9)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Muscle ArchitectureStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Medipol UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- The study participants will be divided into two different groups - a control group and an exercise group. Control Group: 15 Exercise Group: 15 Exercise Program: A strength training program will be provided to the exercise group, carried out 3 days a week with 3 sets of 10 repetitions each day. Total Duration: 8 Weeks (approximately 2 months)
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Medipol University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Seda GÖZENER CANBÜLBÜL, Medipol University
- Investigators
- Seda Gözener Canbülbül, PhD(c), Principal investigator, İstanbul Medipol University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06573879
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- E-10840098-772.02-7779
- Status last verified
- Sep 2024
- First submitted
- 21 Aug 2024
- Last updated
- 19 Sep 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Ward SR, Winters TM, Blemker SS. The architectural design of the gluteal muscle group: implications for movement and rehabilitation. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010 Feb;40(2):95-102. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2010.3302.
PubMed 20118527Gans C, Bock WJ. The functional significance of muscle architecture--a theoretical analysis. Ergeb Anat Entwicklungsgesch. 1965;38:115-42. No abstract available.
PubMed 5319094Gans C, de Vree F. Functional bases of fiber length and angulation in muscle. J Morphol. 1987 Apr;192(1):63-85. doi: 10.1002/jmor.1051920106.
PubMed 3455200Lieber RL, Friden J. Functional and clinical significance of skeletal muscle architecture. Muscle Nerve. 2000 Nov;23(11):1647-66. doi: 10.1002/1097-4598(200011)23:113.0.co;2-m.
PubMed 11054744Narici MV, Binzoni T, Hiltbrand E, Fasel J, Terrier F, Cerretelli P. In vivo human gastrocnemius architecture with changing joint angle at rest and during graded isometric contraction. J Physiol. 1996 Oct 1;496 ( Pt 1)(Pt 1):287-97. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1996.sp021685.
PubMed 8910216Fukunaga T, Ichinose Y, Ito M, Kawakami Y, Fukashiro S. Determination of fascicle length and pennation in a contracting human muscle in vivo. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1997 Jan;82(1):354-8. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1997.82.1.354.
PubMed 9029238Wickiewicz TL, Roy RR, Powell PL, Edgerton VR. Muscle architecture of the human lower limb. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983 Oct;(179):275-83.
PubMed 6617027Kawakami Y, Ichinose Y, Fukunaga T. Architectural and functional features of human triceps surae muscles during contraction. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1998 Aug;85(2):398-404. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1998.85.2.398.
PubMed 9688711Kwah LK, Pinto RZ, Diong J, Herbert RD. Reliability and validity of ultrasound measurements of muscle fascicle length and pennation in humans: a systematic review. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2013 Mar 15;114(6):761-9. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01430.2011. Epub 2013 Jan 10.
PubMed 23305989
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Sep 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effect of Eccentric Exercise on Musculus Triceps Surae Muscle Architecture, Muscle Strength, and Performance in Young Volleyball Players
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06573879
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- E-10840098-772.02-7779
- Conditions
- Muscle Architecture
- Keywords
- Muscle architecture, Muscle strength, Jumping performance
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Medipol UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Nov 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 19 Jan 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 22 Mar 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Aug 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study investigates the architecture, muscle strength, and performance of skeletal muscles. Skeletal muscles constitute a mass of muscle fascicles connected to bones via tendons. Muscle architecture is defined as the geometric arrangement of muscle fiber bundles in relation to the axis that generates force. This arrangement influences the muscle's contraction speed, force generation capacity, and range of motion. Ultrasonography is a method for examining muscle morphology without radiation exposure. The architectural features of muscles have been a proven method for evaluating and enhancing muscle function. The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of eight weeks of eccentric exercises on the right and left triceps surae muscles in young volleyball players. This investigation aims to contribute to the literature concerning muscle architecture. The study will be conducted using statistical analysis and the SPSS program.
The study has obtained ethical approval and will be conducted at Istanbul Medipol University. Thirty healthy young volleyball players will be involved in this research. The participants' muscle architecture, strength, and performance will be measured. Additionally, the impact of eccentric exercises will be examined, and statistical data analysis will be carried out.
Ultimately, this study aims to explore the effects of eccentric exercise on the muscle architecture and performance of young volleyball players, aiming to contribute to the literature by understanding and enhancing muscle function and performance.
Detailed description
Skeletal muscles are organized masses of muscle fascicles covered with connective tissue, attached to bones at both ends through tendons. The volume of a muscle is largely determined by the total number of sarcomeres within that muscle. Sarcomeres are approximately 1 µm in diameter and 2-3 µm in length. These functional units are aligned end-to-end to form myofibrils, which are packed parallel to create muscle fibers (approximately 50 µm in diameter in humans). Bundling these muscle fibers in parallel forms fascicles (approximately 1 to 3 mm in diameter in humans), which, in turn, combine in parallel to create muscles.
Muscle architecture is defined as the geometric arrangement of muscle fiber bundles concerning the axis that generates force. Muscles with fibers extending longitudinally along the muscle length possess longitudinal muscle architecture, while muscles with fibers running at a certain angle along the muscle length and containing shorter fibers possess pennate or multipennate muscle architecture.
This arrangement affects a muscle's contraction speed, force generation capacity, and range of motion known as 'excursion'. In pennate muscles, bundles of fibers, referred to as fascicles, are positioned obliquely and attach to the muscle's aponeuroses. The angle at which a fascicle attaches to the aponeurosis defines the pennation angle. The distance between epimysiums (superficial and deep aponeuroses in ultrasonography) defines the anatomical muscle thickness. These parameters of skeletal muscle architecture are measured through muscle physiology and biomechanical studies to determine the anatomical and contractile characteristics of the muscles. Typical parameters included in architectural analysis are fiber length, pennation angle, and physiological cross-sectional area.
Ultrasonography enables the examination of muscle morphology without radiation exposure. Fascicle length, pennation angle, and muscle thickness can be measured in vivo using two-dimensional (2D) B-mode ultrasonography. In ultrasonographic imaging, normal muscle tissue appears as a structure with low echo intensity. As the epimysium surrounding the muscle is quite reflective, the muscle's boundaries are clearly visible.
While skeletal muscles show significant structural similarities at a microscopic level, muscle architecture is the fundamental factor creating differences in strength and functional capabilities. Understanding the architectural features of muscles allows for the effective assessment and improvement of muscle function. Loading placed on muscles results in an adaptive process leading to muscle development. Muscle architecture allows the macroscopic understanding and interpretation of this adaptation process.
Although muscle strength is primarily determined by genetic structure, it is also influenced by factors such as the level of physical activity, age, gender, motivation, and nutrition. The magnitude of the cross-sectional area of a muscle - which includes the number of engaged fibrils and the size of these fibrils - accounts for the muscle's strength. Developing these aspects is achievable through exercise.
Exercise is defined as a planned, structured, intentional, and continuous activity aimed at enhancing physical fitness. Strength training exercises are designed to increase muscle strength and endurance by applying resistance.
One type of exercise, eccentric exercises, involves movements against gravity using body weight or additional loads. Eccentric exercises are utilized to increase muscle strength and mass. More muscle strength can be generated through these exercises compared to concentric or isometric exercises. Due to their features in injury prevention, rehabilitation, and improving physical fitness in healthy individuals, eccentric training has become quite popular. However, findings regarding the effects of eccentric training on the m. triceps surae are contradictory. Some studies show that eccentric training promotes an increase in muscle fiber length, pennation angle, and muscle thickness, while others find no changes in these architectural outcomes. This might be due to the non-uniform distribution of loads among synergistic muscles and the observation of different mechanical loads for different components of the m. triceps surae. Additionally, short muscle fibers are more sensitive to muscle damage caused by eccentric training compared to long muscle fibers. Considering the differences in architectural features of m. triceps surae segments (GM, GL, SO, and PL), eccentric exercises may produce different results.
The aim of the study is to investigate the effects of 8 weeks of eccentric exercises, performed three times a week for a total of 24 sessions, on the muscle architecture of the m. triceps surae in healthy female participants. Ultrasonography will be utilized to measure fascicle length, pennation angle, and muscle thickness in the gastrocnemius medialis (GM), gastrocnemius lateralis (GL), soleus (SO), and plantaris (PL) muscles before and after the exercise program. It is hypothesized that an 8-week eccentric exercise program will increase fascicle length, pennation angle, and muscle thickness in the m. triceps surae muscles. The architectural adaptations to eccentric exercises must be understood to develop effective exercise programs for improving muscle strength and function.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- The study participants will be divided into two different groups - a control group and an exercise group. Control Group: 15 Exercise Group: 15 Exercise Program: A strength training program will be provided to the exercise group, carried out 3 days a week with 3 sets of 10 repetitions each day. Total Duration: 8 Weeks (approximately 2 months)
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Exercise Group (EG) | Experimental | Behavioral: Eccentric ExerciseExercise Group (EG) is the first arm of the study in which volleyball athlete participants performed eccentric exercises in addition to their exercise routines. |
| Control Group (CG) | No intervention | –Control Group (CG) is the second arm of the study, where volleyball athletes only continued their exercise routines and no external intervention was made. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 14 to 18 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Having healthy lower extremities
- Being a volleyball athlete for at least the last 5 years
- Full range of motion in the lower extremity
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Systemic inflammatory joint disease for both groups
- Having had an acute or chronic lower extremity injury during the last 6 months
- Having any orthopedic disorder in the lower extremity
- Severe pain or limitation of movement in the lower extremity
- Previous lower extremity surgery
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Eccentric ExerciseIt was investigated whether volleyball athlete participants would develop muscle architecture, muscle strength and performance parameters differently from the control group by performing eccentric exercises in addition to their exercise routines. | Behavioural | Exercise Group (EG) |
Primary outcome
Muscle Architecture- muscle thickness
Time frame: 5 months
Muscle architecture of the gastrocnemius medialis, lateralis, and soleus muscles are visualized by the USG device. Their muscle thickness (mm) is measured and recorded.
Muscle Architecture- fiber length
Time frame: 5 months
Muscle architecture of the gastrocnemius medialis, lateralis and soleus muscles are visualized by the USG device. Their fiber length (mm) is measured and recorded.
Muscle Architecture- pennation angle (degree)
Time frame: 5 months
Muscle architecture of the gastrocnemius medialis, lateralis and soleus muscles are visualized by the USG device. Their pennation angle (degree) is measured and recorded.
Performance measurement- Single-leg hop test
Time frame: 5 months
Single-leg hop tests are implemented. Right and left hop results are recorded in cm.
Performance measurement- vertical jump tests
Time frame: 5 months
Vertical jump tests are implemented. Results are recorded in cm.
Muscle force measurement
Time frame: 5 months
The strength of the gastrocnemius medialis, lateralis and soleus muscles is measured and recorded in Newtons.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Sep 2024.
- Background: PubMed 20118527Ward SR, Winters TM, Blemker SS. The architectural design of the gluteal muscle group: implications for movement and rehabilitation. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010 Feb;40(2):95-102. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2010.3302.
- Background: PubMed 5319094Gans C, Bock WJ. The functional significance of muscle architecture--a theoretical analysis. Ergeb Anat Entwicklungsgesch. 1965;38:115-42. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 3455200Gans C, de Vree F. Functional bases of fiber length and angulation in muscle. J Morphol. 1987 Apr;192(1):63-85. doi: 10.1002/jmor.1051920106.
- Background: PubMed 11054744Lieber RL, Friden J. Functional and clinical significance of skeletal muscle architecture. Muscle Nerve. 2000 Nov;23(11):1647-66. doi: 10.1002/1097-4598(200011)23:113.0.co;2-m.
- Background: PubMed 8910216Narici MV, Binzoni T, Hiltbrand E, Fasel J, Terrier F, Cerretelli P. In vivo human gastrocnemius architecture with changing joint angle at rest and during graded isometric contraction. J Physiol. 1996 Oct 1;496 ( Pt 1)(Pt 1):287-97. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1996.sp021685.
- Background: PubMed 9029238Fukunaga T, Ichinose Y, Ito M, Kawakami Y, Fukashiro S. Determination of fascicle length and pennation in a contracting human muscle in vivo. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1997 Jan;82(1):354-8. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1997.82.1.354.
- Background: PubMed 6617027Wickiewicz TL, Roy RR, Powell PL, Edgerton VR. Muscle architecture of the human lower limb. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983 Oct;(179):275-83.
- Background: PubMed 9688711Kawakami Y, Ichinose Y, Fukunaga T. Architectural and functional features of human triceps surae muscles during contraction. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1998 Aug;85(2):398-404. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1998.85.2.398.
- Background: PubMed 23305989Kwah LK, Pinto RZ, Diong J, Herbert RD. Reliability and validity of ultrasound measurements of muscle fascicle length and pennation in humans: a systematic review. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2013 Mar 15;114(6):761-9. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01430.2011. Epub 2013 Jan 10.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Muscle Architecture
Recruiting
Effects of Isometric, Isotonic, and Eccentric VMO Exercises in Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome
Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome, Anterior Knee Pain
Recruiting
Concentric vs Eccentric Full Can Exercise in Partial Rotator Cuff Tears
Partial Rotator Cuff Tears, Rotator Cuff Injuries
RecruitingObservational study
The Relationship Between Transversus Abdominis Muscle Architecture and Upper Extremity Function in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain
Low Back Pain, Functional Reach
RecruitingObservational study
3D-Microscopic Muscle Architecture in Cerebral Palsy
Spastic Cerebral Palsy
Not yet recruiting
Feasibility and Preliminary Effects of a Structured Resistance Training Program in Children Aged 10-14 Years
Muscle Architecture, Ultrasonic Diagnosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Seda Gözener Canbülbül, PhD(c) principal investigator
İstanbul Medipol University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Eccentric Exercise in people with Muscle Architecture, run by Medipol University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Sep 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Muscle Architecture- muscle thickness (time frame: 5 months). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06573879, which also lists 9 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Sep 2024.