Diabetic Peripheral NeuropathyNCT06579716
Whole-Body Vibration Versus Kineso Tape on Nerve Conduction in Patient With Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy
A study testing Traditional balance exercise, Resistance exercise and Whole-body vibration (WBV) in people with Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy, run by Cairo University at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
The purpose of the study was to compare between effect of whole-body vibration and kineso tape on nerve conduction in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 50 to 60 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy
- What is being tested?
- Traditional balance exercise, Resistance exercise and Whole-body vibration (WBV)
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- 1 Nov 2022to 1 Jul 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 50 to 60 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients type 2 diabetes with duration at least 10 years.
- Controlled blood glucose level examined via glycated hemoglobin exam (hba1cless than 9 and more than 6.5).
- Age of patient will range from 50 to 60 years.
- Patients had abnormal nerve conduction study.
Who cannot join
- Patients having ulceration/infection of feet
- Medical/Surgical conditions limiting functional mobility
- Non-ambulatory patients
- Who are not willing to participate?
- Subjects with Type 1 Diabetes mellitus.
- Subjects with Gestational Diabetes.
Show all 9Show fewer
- Subjects who are seriously ill.
- Lower limb fracture or trauma
- Significant renal hepatic disorder
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
The purpose of the study was to compare between effect of whole-body vibration and kineso tape on nerve conduction in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy.
Read the detailed description
Diabetes is a huge and rapidly growing health problem worldwide. In 2019, International Diabetes Federation ( IDF) estimated that the number of people with diabetes was 463 million and expected to be 578 million by 2030, and 700 million by 2045. Two-thirds of people with diabetes live in urban areas, and one in five people with diabetes is above 65 year.
Diabetic peripheral neuropathy is the most prevalent complication of diabetes mellitus. The prevalence of DPN ranges from 21.3 to 34.5% in type 2 DM (T2DM) and between seven to 34.2% in type 1 DM (T1DM).
The high incidence and prevalence of falls among older people with type 2 diabetes mellitus were identified as poor diabetic control, diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) and balance impairment.
Study performed by Ahmed et al., reported that Kinesio tape and resistive exercise improve the dorsiflexors and functional performance in diabetic polyneuropathy.
A randomized controlled trial showed that WBV showed beneficial effects on pain, balance, and quality of life in patients with painful Diabetic peripheral neuropathy.
But till know no study reported us whole body vibration better than kineso or vice versa.
- Conditions
- Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy
- Being tested
- Traditional balance exercise, Resistance exercise, Whole-body vibration (WBV), Kineso tape
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Traditional balance exerciseOther
All patients in both group received a traditional balance exercise program, 3 sessions per week, for 6 weeks. Each session of exercise comprised 10 min of warm-up, 40min of balance exercise, and 5min of cool down. Warm-up included treadmill walking. Balance exercise comprised two sets of sit to stand, one leg stance, tandem stance and 30 squats. The first set of exercises was performed on a stable surface, whereas the second set of exercises was performed on an unstable surface by using Thera band stability trainer. Each set of each exercise was performed for 3 min, with 1-2 min of rest in between the exercises. Cool-down included deep breathing, abdominal breathing, and mild stretching.
Resistance exerciseOther
All patients in both group received a resistance exercise program, 3 sessions per week, for 6 weeks. Each patient was seated in sitting position and the weight sandbags was applied at the dorsum of the foot. The resistance was set to be around 40%-60% of the 1RM. The patient performed the exercise for 3 bouts, every bout 10 repetitions. The one repetition maximum (1RM) was established prior to the training period using the following equation: 1 RM = Weight (kg) X (1 + {0.033 X number of repetitions)}.
Whole-body vibration (WBV)Other
Patients were asked to stand barefoot on the vibratory platform with an even distribution of weight on both feet and familiarized with WBV at a lesser frequency and amplitude. Then, they were asked to bend their knee 30º to the vertical; thereafter, to obtain a greater muscular response, WBV training was performed at a frequency of 30 Hz and an amplitude of 2mm. The exercise comprised five bouts of a 30-sec vibration with a 1-min elapse between the bouts.
Kineso tapeOther
Kineso tape was applied to dorsiflexors 24 hours a day and was replaced every 5 days for patients who were taped in accordance with Kenzo Kase's Kinesio taping Manual. For taping, each patient's leg was placed in a relaxed position while he sat on a taping table. The skin was to be free of oils and lotions, to avoid anything that might limit the acrylic adhesive's ability to adhere to the skin. So, the subject's skin was cleaned with alcohol prior to tape application. For the Tibialis anterior, tape was measured from the muscle origin to the insertion while the muscle was stretched. The base of the tape was applied to the origin at the lateral condyle and superior 2/3 of anterolateral surface of tibia. Then the subject was asked to stretch the foot into plantar flexion and eversion; taping was then finished toward the insertion at the medial and plantar surface of medial cuneiform and base of the first metatarsal.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Traditional balance exercise + Resistance exercise + Whole-body vibration | Experimental | It consisted of 30 participants diagnosed as having diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Each received traditional balance exercise, resistance exercise, and whole-body vibration, for 6 weeks. Receives: Other: Traditional balance exercise; Other: Resistance exercise; Other: Whole-body vibration (WBV) |
| Traditional balance exercise + Resistance exercise + Kineso tape | Experimental | It consisted of 30 participants diagnosed as having diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Each received traditional balance exercise, resistance exercise, and kineso tape, for 6 weeks. Receives: Other: Traditional balance exercise; Other: Resistance exercise; Other: Kineso tape |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Deep peroneal nerve motor conduction velocity
It was measured for all participants in both groups before and after treatment, using Neuropack S1 MEB-9004 NIHON KODEN, JAPAN nerve conduction velocity device.
Measured: 6 weeks
Sural nerve sensory conduction velocity
It was measured for all participants in both groups before and after treatment, using Neuropack S1 MEB-9004 NIHON KODEN, JAPAN nerve conduction velocity device.
Measured: 6 weeks
Berg Balance Scale
It was used to measure the balance for all participants in both groups before and after treatment. It is a 14-item list with each item consisting of a five-point ordinal scale ranging from 0 to 4, with 0 indicating the lowest level of function and 4 the highest level of function. The scale takes approximately 10 to 20 minutes to complete requiring minimal equipment (chair, stopwatch, ruler, and step) and minimal space Berg balance have high validity and reliability. Interpretation: 41-56 = low fall risk, 21-40 = medium fall risk, 0 -20 = high fall risk.
Measured: 6 weeks
Unilateral Stance Test (UST)
It was used to assess postural balance for all participants in both groups before and after treatment. Each subject was instructed to maintain balance on the nondominant leg with eyes opened, eyes closed, and arms spread for as long as possible. The time taken for the contralateral foot to touch the ground was measured in seconds using a stopwatch. This test was performed twice, and the highest score was recorded.
Measured: 6 weeks
Smartphone Kinesis Balance™ fall prevention app
It was used to assess balance and falls risk for all participants in both groups before and after treatment. The app is freely available on the Google Play store, with participants consenting to use of their anonymized data for research and product improvement. The app uses a questionnaire on clinical falls risk factors, combined with a standing balance test and machine learning algorithms to assess balance and falls risk. Participants are provided with advice and exercises to stay healthy and help prevent falls, based on their level of risk (as determined by the smartphone based machine learning algorithm). All data were anonymized at source and transmitted via encrypted channel to a web server where they were stored (in line with GDPR and HIPAA data privacy regulations) for subsequent offline analysis. Data were extracted from the database using MySQL workbench 8.0 (Oracle, CA, USA) and analyzed using Matlab v 9.3.0 (Mathworks, Natick, VA, USA).
Measured: 6 weeks
Quadriceps femoris muscle strength
It was assessed for all participants in both groups before and after treatment, using hand held dynamometry. To evaluate quadriceps muscle strength, the patients were positioned in the prone position, lying with the knee flexed to 90 degrees; the dynamometer was fixed proximal to the ankle on the anterior surface of the leg; and the subjects were asked to perform isometric knee extension. Three maximal isometric contractions were recorded, and the average of the three trials was used for analysis.
Measured: 6 weeks
Tibialis anterior muscle strength
It was assessed for all participants in both groups before and after treatment, using hand held dynamometry. To evaluate tibialis anterior strength, patients were asked to lie supine with their ankles at the edge of the plinth. The ankle joints were placed in the neutral position (between dorsiflexion and plantar flexion). The dynamometer was fixed to the dorsal aspect of the foot, and each subject was asked to perform isometric dorsiflexion. Three maximal isometric contractions were recorded, and the average of the three trials was used for analysis.
Measured: 6 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Aug 2024
- Study start1 Nov 2022
- Primary completion1 Jun 2024
- Study completion1 Jul 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Diabetic Peripheral NeuropathyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Cairo UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Cairo University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Lamis Samir Ahmed, Cairo University
- Investigators
- Hany Ezzat Obaya, PhD, Study chair, Cairo University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06579716
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- P.T.REC/012/005322
- Status last verified
- Aug 2024
- First submitted
- 28 Aug 2024
- Last updated
- 30 Aug 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Aug 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Whole-Body Vibration Versus Kineso Tape on Nerve Conduction in Patient With Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06579716
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- P.T.REC/012/005322
- Conditions
- Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Cairo UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Nov 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jun 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Jul 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Aug 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of the study was to compare between effect of whole-body vibration and kineso tape on nerve conduction in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy.
Detailed description
Diabetes is a huge and rapidly growing health problem worldwide. In 2019, International Diabetes Federation ( IDF) estimated that the number of people with diabetes was 463 million and expected to be 578 million by 2030, and 700 million by 2045. Two-thirds of people with diabetes live in urban areas, and one in five people with diabetes is above 65 year.
Diabetic peripheral neuropathy is the most prevalent complication of diabetes mellitus. The prevalence of DPN ranges from 21.3 to 34.5% in type 2 DM (T2DM) and between seven to 34.2% in type 1 DM (T1DM).
The high incidence and prevalence of falls among older people with type 2 diabetes mellitus were identified as poor diabetic control, diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) and balance impairment.
Study performed by Ahmed et al., reported that Kinesio tape and resistive exercise improve the dorsiflexors and functional performance in diabetic polyneuropathy.
A randomized controlled trial showed that WBV showed beneficial effects on pain, balance, and quality of life in patients with painful Diabetic peripheral neuropathy.
But till know no study reported us whole body vibration better than kineso or vice versa.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Traditional balance exercise + Resistance exercise + Whole-body vibration | Experimental | Other: Traditional balance exercise, Other: Resistance exercise, Other: Whole-body vibration (WBV)It consisted of 30 participants diagnosed as having diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Each received traditional balance exercise, resistance exercise, and whole-body vibration, for 6 weeks. |
| Traditional balance exercise + Resistance exercise + Kineso tape | Experimental | Other: Traditional balance exercise, Other: Resistance exercise, Other: Kineso tapeIt consisted of 30 participants diagnosed as having diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Each received traditional balance exercise, resistance exercise, and kineso tape, for 6 weeks. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 50 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients type 2 diabetes with duration at least 10 years.
- Controlled blood glucose level examined via glycated hemoglobin exam (hba1cless than 9 and more than 6.5).
- Age of patient will range from 50 to 60 years.
- Patients had abnormal nerve conduction study.
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Patients having ulceration/infection of feet
- Medical/Surgical conditions limiting functional mobility
- Non-ambulatory patients
- Who are not willing to participate?
- Subjects with Type 1 Diabetes mellitus.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Traditional balance exerciseAll patients in both group received a traditional balance exercise program, 3 sessions per week, for 6 weeks. Each session of exercise comprised 10 min of warm-up, 40min of balance exercise, and 5min of cool down. Warm-up included treadmill walking. Balance exercise comprised two sets of sit to stand, one leg stance, tandem stance and 30 squats. The first set of exercises was performed on a stable surface, whereas the second set of exercises was performed on an unstable surface by using Thera band stability trainer. Each set of each exercise was performed for 3 min, with 1-2 min of rest in between the exercises. Cool-down included deep breathing, abdominal breathing, and mild stretching. | Other | Traditional balance exercise + Resistance exercise + Kineso tape, Traditional balance exercise + Resistance exercise + Whole-body vibration |
| Resistance exerciseAll patients in both group received a resistance exercise program, 3 sessions per week, for 6 weeks. Each patient was seated in sitting position and the weight sandbags was applied at the dorsum of the foot. The resistance was set to be around 40%-60% of the 1RM. The patient performed the exercise for 3 bouts, every bout 10 repetitions. The one repetition maximum (1RM) was established prior to the training period using the following equation: 1 RM = Weight (kg) X (1 + {0.033 X number of repetitions)}. | Other | Traditional balance exercise + Resistance exercise + Kineso tape, Traditional balance exercise + Resistance exercise + Whole-body vibration |
| Whole-body vibration (WBV)Patients were asked to stand barefoot on the vibratory platform with an even distribution of weight on both feet and familiarized with WBV at a lesser frequency and amplitude. Then, they were asked to bend their knee 30º to the vertical; thereafter, to obtain a greater muscular response, WBV training was performed at a frequency of 30 Hz and an amplitude of 2mm. The exercise comprised five bouts of a 30-sec vibration with a 1-min elapse between the bouts. | Other | Traditional balance exercise + Resistance exercise + Whole-body vibration |
| Kineso tapeKineso tape was applied to dorsiflexors 24 hours a day and was replaced every 5 days for patients who were taped in accordance with Kenzo Kase's Kinesio taping Manual. For taping, each patient's leg was placed in a relaxed position while he sat on a taping table. The skin was to be free of oils and lotions, to avoid anything that might limit the acrylic adhesive's ability to adhere to the skin. So, the subject's skin was cleaned with alcohol prior to tape application. For the Tibialis anterior, tape was measured from the muscle origin to the insertion while the muscle was stretched. The base of the tape was applied to the origin at the lateral condyle and superior 2/3 of anterolateral surface of tibia. Then the subject was asked to stretch the foot into plantar flexion and eversion; taping was then finished toward the insertion at the medial and plantar surface of medial cuneiform and base of the first metatarsal. | Other | Traditional balance exercise + Resistance exercise + Kineso tape |
Primary outcome
Deep peroneal nerve motor conduction velocity
Time frame: 6 weeks
It was measured for all participants in both groups before and after treatment, using Neuropack S1 MEB-9004 NIHON KODEN, JAPAN nerve conduction velocity device.
Sural nerve sensory conduction velocity
Time frame: 6 weeks
It was measured for all participants in both groups before and after treatment, using Neuropack S1 MEB-9004 NIHON KODEN, JAPAN nerve conduction velocity device.
Berg Balance Scale
Time frame: 6 weeks
It was used to measure the balance for all participants in both groups before and after treatment. It is a 14-item list with each item consisting of a five-point ordinal scale ranging from 0 to 4, with 0 indicating the lowest level of function and 4 the highest level of function. The scale takes approximately 10 to 20 minutes to complete requiring minimal equipment (chair, stopwatch, ruler, and step) and minimal space Berg balance have high validity and reliability. Interpretation: 41-56 = low fall risk, 21-40 = medium fall risk, 0 -20 = high fall risk.
Unilateral Stance Test (UST)
Time frame: 6 weeks
It was used to assess postural balance for all participants in both groups before and after treatment. Each subject was instructed to maintain balance on the nondominant leg with eyes opened, eyes closed, and arms spread for as long as possible. The time taken for the contralateral foot to touch the ground was measured in seconds using a stopwatch. This test was performed twice, and the highest score was recorded.
Smartphone Kinesis Balance™ fall prevention app
Time frame: 6 weeks
It was used to assess balance and falls risk for all participants in both groups before and after treatment. The app is freely available on the Google Play store, with participants consenting to use of their anonymized data for research and product improvement. The app uses a questionnaire on clinical falls risk factors, combined with a standing balance test and machine learning algorithms to assess balance and falls risk. Participants are provided with advice and exercises to stay healthy and help prevent falls, based on their level of risk (as determined by the smartphone based machine learning algorithm). All data were anonymized at source and transmitted via encrypted channel to a web server where they were stored (in line with GDPR and HIPAA data privacy regulations) for subsequent offline analysis. Data were extracted from the database using MySQL workbench 8.0 (Oracle, CA, USA) and analyzed using Matlab v 9.3.0 (Mathworks, Natick, VA, USA).
Quadriceps femoris muscle strength
Time frame: 6 weeks
It was assessed for all participants in both groups before and after treatment, using hand held dynamometry. To evaluate quadriceps muscle strength, the patients were positioned in the prone position, lying with the knee flexed to 90 degrees; the dynamometer was fixed proximal to the ankle on the anterior surface of the leg; and the subjects were asked to perform isometric knee extension. Three maximal isometric contractions were recorded, and the average of the three trials was used for analysis.
Tibialis anterior muscle strength
Time frame: 6 weeks
It was assessed for all participants in both groups before and after treatment, using hand held dynamometry. To evaluate tibialis anterior strength, patients were asked to lie supine with their ankles at the edge of the plinth. The ankle joints were placed in the neutral position (between dorsiflexion and plantar flexion). The dynamometer was fixed to the dorsal aspect of the foot, and each subject was asked to perform isometric dorsiflexion. Three maximal isometric contractions were recorded, and the average of the three trials was used for analysis.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Aug 2024.
Related trials for Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy
Active, not recruiting
Wearable Insoles for Recurrent Diabetic Ulcer Prevention
Diabetes, Peripheral Neuropathy
Recruiting
Effect of 4-7-8 Breathing Technique on Pain and Anxiety During Electromyography in Diabetic Neuropathy
Diabetic Neuropathies, Diabetes Mellitus (Type 2)
Active, not recruiting
Comparative Effects Of Sensory Reweighting And Proprioceptive Facilitation Training On Balance And Fall Risk In Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy
Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (DPN)
Not yet recruiting
Adaptive Gamified Sensory Training on Sensory Function and Limb-Specific Functional Performance in Patients With Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy
Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy
Active, not recruiting
Comparative Effects of tDCS and tACS on Pain, Dexterity, and Strength in Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy
Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (DPN)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Hany Ezzat Obaya, PhD study chair
Cairo University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Traditional balance exercise, Resistance exercise and Whole-body vibration (WBV) in people with Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy, run by Cairo University at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Aug 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Deep peroneal nerve motor conduction velocity (time frame: 6 weeks). The study lists 7 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Aug 2024.