PainREPABS-BPGNCT06614257
REduced Pain After Bariatric Surgery - Gastric Bypass
A study testing LG-TAP block with local anesthetic, Port site infiltration and LG-TAP block with saline solution in people with Pain and Postoperative Pain, run by Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
This study aims to analyze the effect of laparoscopic guided transversus abdominis plane (LG-TAP) block compared to placebo for postoperative analgesia following laparoscopic gastric bypass. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Pain, Postoperative Pain, Acute Pain
- What is being tested?
- LG-TAP block with local anesthetic, Port site infiltration and LG-TAP block with saline solution
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 84 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- 4 Jan 2022to 8 Mar 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Elective Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass
- Body Mass Index (BMI) > 35 kg/m² and at least one condition related to obesity (e.g., hypertension, type II diabetes, dyslipidemia, hepatic steatosis, etc)
- BMI > 40 kg/m², even in the absence of comorbidities
- ASA physical status score < 4
Who cannot join
- ASA physical status score ≥ 4
- Patient's refusal or inability to sign the informed consent
- Allergies to any drug provided by the study protocol
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: REduced Pain After Bariatric Surgery - Gastric Bypass (REPABS-BPG)
This study aims to analyze the effect of laparoscopic guided transversus abdominis plane (LG-TAP) block compared to placebo for postoperative analgesia following laparoscopic gastric bypass. One group of participants received a (LG-TAP) block with local anesthetic while the other group received (LG-TAP) block with saline solution (placebo).
- Conditions
- Pain, Postoperative Pain, Acute Pain, Analgesia, Bariatric Surgery Candidate, Anesthesia
- Being tested
- LG-TAP block with local anesthetic, Port site infiltration, LG-TAP block with saline solution
- Medical subject headings
- Pain, Pain, Postoperative, Acute Pain, Agnosia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
LG-TAP block with local anestheticDrug
The laparoscopic guided TAP Block was performed by surgeon at the beginning of surgery, injecting 15 ml of Ropivacaine 0.5% on each side, using an atraumatic needle (10/15 cm length, 20 Gauge diameter) close to the anterior axillary line, between the iliac crest and the subcostal margin. Correct needle tip positioning between the transverse muscle of the abdomen and the internal oblique was verified through laparoscopic guidance.
Port site infiltrationProcedure or surgery
Prior the surgical incision, an infiltration of the laparoscopic access using a total of 10 ml Ropivacaine 0.5% was performed by surgeon
LG-TAP block with saline solutionDrug
The laparoscopic guided TAP Block was performed by surgeon at the beginning of surgery, injecting 15 ml of Saline solution (NaCl 0.9%) on each side, using an atraumatic needle (10/15 cm length, 20 Gauge diameter) close to the anterior axillary line, between the iliac crest and the subcostal margin. Correct needle tip positioning between the transverse muscle of the abdomen and the internal oblique was verified through laparoscopic guidance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| LG-TAP | Experimental | The laparoscopic guided TAP Block was performed at the beginning of surgery, injecting 15 ml of Local Anesthetic (Ropivacaine Hydrochloride 0.5%) on each side, using an atraumatic needle (10/15 cm length, 20 Gauge diameter) close to the anterior axillary line, between the iliac crest and the subcostal margin. Correct needle tip positioning between the transverse muscle of the abdomen and the internal oblique was verified through laparoscopic guidance. Receives: Drug: LG-TAP block with local anesthetic; Procedure: Port site infiltration |
| PLACEBO | Placebo comparator | The laparoscopic guided TAP Block was performed at the beginning of surgery, injecting 15 ml of Saline solution (NaCl 0.9%) on each side, using an atraumatic needle (10/15 cm length, 20 Gauge diameter) close to the anterior axillary line, between the iliac crest and the subcostal margin. Correct needle tip positioning between the transverse muscle of the abdomen and the internal oblique was verified through laparoscopic guidance. Receives: Procedure: Port site infiltration; Drug: LG-TAP block with saline solution |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Pain Score
A numerical rating scale (NRS) from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain) will be used to evaluate pain at rest during 24 hours after surgery
Measured: 24 hours
Secondary outcomes (7)
Morphine Consumption
Total of intravenous morphine (expressed in milligrams) administered administered during the first 24 hours after surgery
Measured: 24 hours
Ketorolac Consumption
Total of intravenous toradol (expressed in milligrams) administered administered during the first 24 hours after surgery
Measured: 24 hours
Nausea and/or Vomiting
Incidence of nausea and/or vomiting
Measured: 48 hours
Length of Hospital Stay
Time between surgery and dismission from the hospital
Measured: 72 hours
Timt to walking
Time between surgery and patient starting to walk
Measured: 72 hours
Time to first flatus
Time between surgery and patient having flatus
Measured: 72 hours
Surgical Complications
Incidence of complications related to surgery
Measured: 7 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Sep 2024
- Study start4 Jan 2022
- Primary completion3 Mar 2024
- Study completion8 Mar 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 84 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Vincenzo Bruni, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico
- Investigators
- Vincenzo Bruni, MD, Principal investigator, Fondazione Policlinico Campus Bio-Medico
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06614257
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PAR 90/21
- Acronym
- REPABS-BPG
- Status last verified
- Sep 2024
- First submitted
- 16 May 2024
- Last updated
- 26 Sep 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Ripolles-Melchor J, Sanchez-Santos R, Abad-Motos A, Gimeno-Moro AM, Diez-Remesal Y, Jove-Albores P, Arago-Chofre P, Ortiz-Sebastian S, Sanchez-Martin R, Ramirez-Rodriguez JM, Trullenque-Juan R, Valenti-Azcarate V, Ramiro-Ruiz A, Correa-Chacon OC, Batalla A, Gimeno-Grauwinkel C, Sanahuja-Blasco JM, Gonzalez-Valverde FM, Galan-Menendez P, Diez-Zapirain MJ, Vilallonga R, Zorrilla-Vaca A, Pascual-Bellosta AM, Martinez-Ubieto J, Carrascosa-Miron T, Ruiz-Escobar A, Martin-Garcia-Almenta E, Suarez-de-la-Rica A, Bausili M, Palacios-Cordoba A, Olvera-Garcia MM, Meza-Vega JA, Sanchez-Pernaute A, Abad-Gurumeta A, Ferrando-Ortola C, Martin-Vaquerizo B, Torres-Alfonso JR, Aguado-Sanchez S, Sanchez-Cabezudo-Noguera F, Garcia-Erce JA, Aldecoa C; POWER 3 Study Investigators Group. Higher Adherence to ERAS Society(R) Recommendations is Associated with Shorter Hospital Stay Without an Increase in Postoperative Complications or Readmissions in Bariatric Surgery: the Association Between Use of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols and Postoperative Complications after Bariatric Surgery (POWER 3) Multicenter Observational Study. Obes Surg. 2022 Apr;32(4):1289-1299. doi: 10.1007/s11695-022-05949-6. Epub 2022 Feb 10.
PubMed 35143011Ruiz-Tovar J, Garcia A, Ferrigni C, Gonzalez J, Levano-Linares C, Jimenez-Fuertes M, Llavero C, Duran M. Laparoscopic-Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block as Part of Multimodal Analgesia in Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Within an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Program: a Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial. Obes Surg. 2018 Nov;28(11):3374-3379. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3376-8.
PubMed 29980989
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Sep 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- REduced Pain After Bariatric Surgery - Gastric Bypass (REPABS-BPG)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06614257
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- REPABS-BPG / PAR 90/21
- Conditions
- Pain, Postoperative Pain, Acute Pain, Analgesia, Bariatric Surgery Candidate, Anesthesia
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 84 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-MedicoUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 4 Jan 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 3 Mar 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 8 Mar 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 Sep 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study aims to analyze the effect of laparoscopic guided transversus abdominis plane (LG-TAP) block compared to placebo for postoperative analgesia following laparoscopic gastric bypass. One group of participants received a (LG-TAP) block with local anesthetic while the other group received (LG-TAP) block with saline solution (placebo).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| LG-TAP | Experimental | Drug: LG-TAP block with local anesthetic, Procedure: Port site infiltrationThe laparoscopic guided TAP Block was performed at the beginning of surgery, injecting 15 ml of Local Anesthetic (Ropivacaine Hydrochloride 0.5%) on each side, using an atraumatic needle (10/15 cm length, 20 Gauge diameter) close to the anterior axillary line, between the iliac crest and the subcostal margin. Correct needle tip positioning between the transverse muscle of the abdomen and the internal oblique was verified through laparoscopic guidance. |
| PLACEBO | Placebo comparator | Procedure: Port site infiltration, Drug: LG-TAP block with saline solutionThe laparoscopic guided TAP Block was performed at the beginning of surgery, injecting 15 ml of Saline solution (NaCl 0.9%) on each side, using an atraumatic needle (10/15 cm length, 20 Gauge diameter) close to the anterior axillary line, between the iliac crest and the subcostal margin. Correct needle tip positioning between the transverse muscle of the abdomen and the internal oblique was verified through laparoscopic guidance. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Elective Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass
- Body Mass Index (BMI) > 35 kg/m² and at least one condition related to obesity (e.g., hypertension, type II diabetes, dyslipidemia, hepatic steatosis, etc)
- BMI > 40 kg/m², even in the absence of comorbidities
- ASA physical status score < 4
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- ASA physical status score ≥ 4
- Patient's refusal or inability to sign the informed consent
- Allergies to any drug provided by the study protocol
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| LG-TAP block with local anestheticThe laparoscopic guided TAP Block was performed by surgeon at the beginning of surgery, injecting 15 ml of Ropivacaine 0.5% on each side, using an atraumatic needle (10/15 cm length, 20 Gauge diameter) close to the anterior axillary line, between the iliac crest and the subcostal margin. Correct needle tip positioning between the transverse muscle of the abdomen and the internal oblique was verified through laparoscopic guidance. | Drug | LG-TAP |
| Port site infiltrationPrior the surgical incision, an infiltration of the laparoscopic access using a total of 10 ml Ropivacaine 0.5% was performed by surgeon | Procedure or surgery | LG-TAP, PLACEBO |
| LG-TAP block with saline solutionThe laparoscopic guided TAP Block was performed by surgeon at the beginning of surgery, injecting 15 ml of Saline solution (NaCl 0.9%) on each side, using an atraumatic needle (10/15 cm length, 20 Gauge diameter) close to the anterior axillary line, between the iliac crest and the subcostal margin. Correct needle tip positioning between the transverse muscle of the abdomen and the internal oblique was verified through laparoscopic guidance. | Drug | PLACEBO |
Primary outcome
Pain Score
Time frame: 24 hours
A numerical rating scale (NRS) from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain) will be used to evaluate pain at rest during 24 hours after surgery
7 secondary outcomes
Morphine Consumption
Time frame: 24 hours
Ketorolac Consumption
Time frame: 24 hours
Nausea and/or Vomiting
Time frame: 48 hours
Length of Hospital Stay
Time frame: 72 hours
Timt to walking
Time frame: 72 hours
Time to first flatus
Time frame: 72 hours
Surgical Complications
Time frame: 7 days
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Sep 2024.
- Results publication: PubMed 35143011Ripolles-Melchor J, Sanchez-Santos R, Abad-Motos A, Gimeno-Moro AM, Diez-Remesal Y, Jove-Albores P, Arago-Chofre P, Ortiz-Sebastian S, Sanchez-Martin R, Ramirez-Rodriguez JM, Trullenque-Juan R, Valenti-Azcarate V, Ramiro-Ruiz A, Correa-Chacon OC, Batalla A, Gimeno-Grauwinkel C, Sanahuja-Blasco JM, Gonzalez-Valverde FM, Galan-Menendez P, Diez-Zapirain MJ, Vilallonga R, Zorrilla-Vaca A, Pascual-Bellosta AM, Martinez-Ubieto J, Carrascosa-Miron T, Ruiz-Escobar A, Martin-Garcia-Almenta E, Suarez-de-la-Rica A, Bausili M, Palacios-Cordoba A, Olvera-Garcia MM, Meza-Vega JA, Sanchez-Pernaute A, Abad-Gurumeta A, Ferrando-Ortola C, Martin-Vaquerizo B, Torres-Alfonso JR, Aguado-Sanchez S, Sanchez-Cabezudo-Noguera F, Garcia-Erce JA, Aldecoa C; POWER 3 Study Investigators Group. Higher Adherence to ERAS Society(R) Recommendations is Associated with Shorter Hospital Stay Without an Increase in Postoperative Complications or Readmissions in Bariatric Surgery: the Association Between Use of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols and Postoperative Complications after Bariatric Surgery (POWER 3) Multicenter Observational Study. Obes Surg. 2022 Apr;32(4):1289-1299. doi: 10.1007/s11695-022-05949-6. Epub 2022 Feb 10.
- Results publication: PubMed 29980989Ruiz-Tovar J, Garcia A, Ferrigni C, Gonzalez J, Levano-Linares C, Jimenez-Fuertes M, Llavero C, Duran M. Laparoscopic-Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block as Part of Multimodal Analgesia in Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Within an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Program: a Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial. Obes Surg. 2018 Nov;28(11):3374-3379. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3376-8.
Related trials for Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Stress Ball Use During Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal After Coronary Angiography
Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal, Stress Ball
Recruiting
Empowered Relief® for Cancer Survivors With Chronic Pain
Chronic Pain Due to Cancer, Pain Catastrophizing
RecruitingPhase 4
ESP Blocks for Posterior Spinal Fusion
Postoperative Pain
RecruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotypes in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Hip Hinge Exercises on Pain, Range of Motion and Functional Disability in Non-specific Low Back Pain.
Low Back Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Vincenzo Bruni, MD principal investigator
Fondazione Policlinico Campus Bio-Medico
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing LG-TAP block with local anesthetic, Port site infiltration and LG-TAP block with saline solution in people with Pain and Postoperative Pain, run by Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Sep 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Pain Score (time frame: 24 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06614257, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Sep 2024.