AzTrials
AzTrials

AnxietyNCT06616324

Virtual Reality to Reduce Pain and Anxiety During Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy

A study testing Virtual Reality in people with Anxiety and Pain, run by Zealand University Hospital at 1 site in Denmark.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of intraprocedural Virtual Reality (VR) as a non-pharmacological intervention for mitigating anxiety and pain during Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Anxiety, Pain, Virtual Reality
What is being tested?
Virtual Reality
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
72 participants
Where
1 siteDenmark
Study dates
24 Oct 2024to 25 Jun 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Scheduled for ESWL at Region Zealand
  • Age of 18 or above
  • Ability to understand the trial protocol, risks, and benefits and provide signed informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Inability to read and understand Danish.
  • Uncooperativeness (as judged by investigators)
  • Claustrophobia or fear of small spaces
  • Disorders that prevent the person from wearing a VR device
  • Highly visually or auditive impaired

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Denmark1 site
  • Urologisk Afdeling

    Roskilde, 4000

Other trials in Denmark

About this study

Official title: Virtual Reality: An Innovative Approach to Reduce Pain and Anxiety During Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy - A Randomized Controlled Trial

The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of intraprocedural Virtual Reality (VR) as a non-pharmacological intervention for mitigating anxiety and pain during Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL). The hypothesis is that VR can effectively reduce both pain and anxiety levels in patients by diverting their cognitive focus, potentially leading to a decrease in pharmacological intervention requirements.

The primary outcome is pain at energy level 900 during ESWL for the intervention and the control group.

Read more

The secondary outcomes are as follows:

  • Type and dose of analgesia
  • Conductance scores/values
  • Anxiety levels
  • Patient satisfaction
  • Procedure duration
  • Adverse events

Participants will be randomized into either the intervention or control group. Both groups will undergo ESWL according to standard treatment; however, the intervention group will wear a Virtual Reality headset and noise-cancelling headphones during the procedure, while the control group will not

Read the detailed description

The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of intraprocedural Virtual Reality (VR) as a non-pharmacological intervention for mitigating anxiety and pain during Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy (ESWL). The hypothesis is that VR can effectively reduce both pain and anxiety levels in patients by diverting their cognitive focus, potentially leading to a decrease in pharmacological intervention requirements.

Furthermore, the study aims to gather data on patients' perspectives regarding the functionality and efficacy of VR technology in enhancing their intraprocedural experience. This includes an evaluation of VR's role in contribution to the overall procedural experience.

Introduction: According to the European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines, urolithiasis is treated with ESWL, Ureteroscopy (URS), Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PNL), or other surgical treatments that may relieve the obstructive symptoms of the urinary tract. EAU recommends ESWL as the primary treatment for renal pelvic and proximal ureteral stones of <20 mm. The success of ESWL is closely related to factors such as the experience of the urologist using the machine, localization of the stone, urinary system anatomy, and the patient's compliance with the procedure. To ensure compliance, it is important to minimize patients' pain and anxiety. To handle pain and anxiety, various ways including both pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches are in use today. Pharmacological control of pain and anxiety, including the use of sedation, is a complex decision that consider both benefits and potential risks. While not highly recommended due to the side effects associated with these agents, such as hypotension, respiratory depression, confusion, and limitations in ability to operate machines, sedation medication can be an effective means of managing pain and anxiety when used judiciously.

Non-pharmacological alternatives have been recommended for decreasing pain and anxiety during ESWL, as for example music which have been found beneficial in several studies. VR can immerse patients into a virtual environment and distract patients from e.g., unpleasant sounds, sights, and feelings. Integrating VR into hospital settings, has shown the potential to offer several advantages, such as promoting patients' distraction, knowledge, and information. The advantage lies in the engagement of multiple sensory perceptions, including hearing and vision, which can be beneficial in enhancing the potential for reduced experiences of pain and anxiety, as these perceptions typically strengthen humans' cognitive memory. The hypothesis is that distraction from VR can lower pain perception and reduce anxiety for patient undergoing EWSL compared with standard care.

Virtual Reality (VR) has been widely used in psychiatry and for children when they need to have a peripheral venous catheter inserted. Many studies show that VR has a distracting effect, and this distraction can be used to reduce both pain and anxiety. The novelty of this research study lies in using VR during ESWL so that the patient experiences less pain and anxiety. There is only one study from 2023, conducted in Belgium, which investigates whether VR is effective in reducing pain in kidney stone patients during ESWL. This study is a randomized controlled trial (RCT), and its results support the use of VR as a method for pain relief during ESWL.

There is a significant need for more evidence-based research studies in this area. With more research, it will be possible to better assess whether VR has the desired effect and relevance within medical procedures.

Method: The trial will be designed as a randomized controlled clinical trial while being adequately powered for the primary outcome. The randomization will be computer-generated randomization by the statistic programme R studio with sequence 1:1 by a colleague not associated to the study. The sample size estimation showed that 72 participants are needed with a 15% drop rate. The participants will be randomized into one of two groups. There will be randomization on the day of inclusion by REDcap which also store the data about the patients.

Because of VR's nature, it is impossible to blind the participants. The outcome assessors, investigators, data analysts, and manuscript writers will be blinded. The participants are patients undergoing urological procedure at Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde. All ASA scores are accepted.

All patients scheduled for ESWL will be screened based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patients are eligible if they meet all inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria. Intervention Group: Patients will receive ESWL using the EDAP-TMS model Sonolith i-sys machine with standard medication, supplemented by a Virtual Reality headset and Active-Noise-Cancelling (ANC) headphones, which will play a video of the patient's choice. Control Group: Patients will receive ESWL with standard medication, without the addition of VR or ANC-headphones. Participation in this trial will not result in prolonged admission or require additional follow-up visits.

The four different videos of what the patient can choose from, are developed specific for intraprocedural use and have been established in cooperation with people older than 65 years of age, private company Khora and Zealand University Hospital, Denmark and Lund University. The videos are created to fit different personalities and needs when persons undergo painful procedures. The development of the videos has focused on comprehending videos that have movement, colours, sound and pixels quality to prevent cyber sickness.

Standard intraprocedural management: All patients will follow the traditional standard treatment which includes Paracetamol and Ibuprofen as premedication with the possibility of receiving sublingual fentanyl during procedure to comfort the patient.

Being tested
Virtual Reality
Keywords
Virtual Reality, Pain, Anxiety, VR, ESWL, Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy, Lithotripsy, Non-pharmacological
Medical subject headings
Anxiety Disorders, Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Virtual RealityDevice

    Participants in the intervention group will undergo ESWL according to standard treatment but with the addition of Virtual Reality and ANC-headphones as a supplement.

Study groups in NCT06616324
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
InterventionExperimentalStandard treatment with Virtual Reality headset and Active-Noise-Cancelling headphones
Receives: Device: Virtual Reality
Control GroupNo interventionStandard treatment without VR headset and ANC-headphones

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Pain at energy level 900

    Data about the pain is registered at energy level 900 during the ESWL treatment for the intervention and the control group. The pain is measured by using the Numeric Rating Scale rating from 0-10. Zero is no pain at all and 10 is the worst imaginable pain. The outcome measure will be assessed during the patient ESWL treatment when the energy level of 900 is reached.

    Measured: The outcome measure will be assessed from the start of the patient&#39;s ESWL treatment until the end of the procedure, with an average treatment duration of approximately 45 minutes.

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Patient Satisfaction

    Patient satisfaction will be measured using a Likert scale from 1 to 5, where 1 and 2 indicate dissatisfaction, 3 is neutral, and 4 or 5 indicate satisfaction.

    Measured: The outcome measure will be assessed by the patient 1 hour or less after the ESWL treatment have ended.

  2. Adverse events

    Adverse events are defined as any unwanted event, sign, or symptom occurring during the trial, whether the adverse is related to the VR head-mounted display or not.

    If any adverse events occur they will be noted.

    Measured: The outcome measure will be noted during or less than 1 hour after the ESWL treatment is finished.

  3. Procedure duration

    The procedure time will be recorded and is defined as the duration from the first shock wave to the last.

    Measured: Measurements will be recorded for each individual during the treatment approximately 45 minutes.

  4. Pre- and intraprocedural pain

    Pain will be measured using the Numeric Rating Scale, rating from 0 to 10, where 0 represents no pain at all and 10 represents the worst imaginable pain. A lower score is favorable.

    Measured: Measurements will be taken at the day for treatment for each individual. At arrival at preperations room and during the patients ESWL treatment approximately 2 hours time frame..

  5. Anxiety

    Anxiety will be measured by using Numeric Rating Scale scale 0-10. Zero is no anxiety at all, and 10 is the worst imaginable anxiety. A lower score is favorable. To measure a more objective anxiety digital biomarkers by a proven wrist band made by Empatica will be used.

    Measured: Measurements will be taken at the day for treatment for each individual. At arrival at preperations room and during the patients ESWL treatment approximately 2 hours time frame.

  6. Conductance score/values

    A machine that measures pain by monitoring the skin conductance. The PMD-200 uses a model based on skin conductance and other physiologic and hemodynamic changes and gives a Nociception Level Index (NOL) (20) from 0 to 100, where above 25 means treatment/pain medication is suggested. Therefore a score lower than 25 is favorable. The MedStorm PainSensor is a skin conductance algesimeter (SCA) that counts the peaks per second of skin conductance (when sympathetic nerves fire). A value over 0.06 suggests the level of nociception should be treated with pain medication(s). Therefore a score lower than 0.06 is favorable.

    Both machines will be used.

    Measured: The outcome measure will be assessed from the start of the patient&#39;s ESWL treatment until the end of the procedure, with an average treatment duration of approximately 45 minutes.

  7. Type and dose of analgesia

    Cumulative analgesia is the total amount of analgesia administrated before (at the same day) and during the procedure, and all analgetic medications will be collected for comparison. Different opioids will be converted to morphine IV equivalents for comparison.

    Measured: The outcome measure will be assessed from the start of the patient&#39;s ESWL treatment until the end of the procedure, with an average treatment duration of approximately 45 minutes.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Sep 2024
  2. Study start24 Oct 2024
  3. Primary completion25 Jun 2026
  4. Study completion25 Jun 2026

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Investigator
Enrolment
72 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06616324
Sponsor's protocol ID
EMN-2024-06741
Status last verified
Sep 2026
First submitted
20 Aug 2024
Last updated
2 Nov 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Zhang L, Zhang X, Pu Y, Zhang Y, Fan J. Global, Regional, and National Burden of Urolithiasis from 1990 to 2019: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Aug 15;14:971-983. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S370591. eCollection 2022.

    PubMed 35996396
  • Turk C, Petrik A, Sarica K, Seitz C, Skolarikos A, Straub M, Knoll T. EAU Guidelines on Diagnosis and Conservative Management of Urolithiasis. Eur Urol. 2016 Mar;69(3):468-74. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.040. Epub 2015 Aug 28.

    PubMed 26318710
  • Marsdin E, Noble JG, Reynard JM, Turney BW. Audiovisual distraction reduces pain perception during shockwave lithotripsy. J Endourol. 2012 May;26(5):531-4. doi: 10.1089/end.2011.0430. Epub 2012 Feb 8.

    PubMed 22098167
  • Ozsaker E, Diramali A. The effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for pain relief during extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy procedure. Pain Manag Nurs. 2014 Mar;15(1):59-68. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2012.06.003. Epub 2012 Aug 18.

    PubMed 24602425
  • Yilmaz E, Ozcan S, Basar M, Basar H, Batislam E, Ferhat M. Music decreases anxiety and provides sedation in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Urology. 2003 Feb;61(2):282-6. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)02375-0.

    PubMed 12597931
  • Nakahara H, Furuya S, Masuko T, Francis PR, Kinoshita H. Performing music can induce greater modulation of emotion-related psychophysiological responses than listening to music. Int J Psychophysiol. 2011 Sep;81(3):152-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.06.003. Epub 2011 Jun 24.

    PubMed 21704661
  • McCaffery M. Nursing approaches to nonpharmacological pain control. Int J Nurs Stud. 1990;27(1):1-5. doi: 10.1016/0020-7489(90)90018-e.

    PubMed 2179151
  • Cakmak O, Cimen S, Tarhan H, Ekin RG, Akarken I, Ulker V, Celik O, Yucel C, Kisa E, Ergani B, Cetin T, Kozacioglu Z. Listening to music during shock wave lithotripsy decreases anxiety, pain, and dissatisfaction : A randomized controlled study. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2017 Oct;129(19-20):687-691. doi: 10.1007/s00508-017-1212-0. Epub 2017 May 17.

    PubMed 28516381
  • Wang Z, Feng D, Wei W. Impact of music on anxiety and pain control during extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Jan 29;100(4):e23684. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023684.

    PubMed 33530169
  • Weynants L, Chys B, D'hulst P, Merckx L, Van Besien J, Tailly T. Virtual reality for pain control during shock wave lithotripsy: a randomized controlled study. World J Urol. 2023 Feb;41(2):589-594. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04280-8. Epub 2023 Jan 21.

    PubMed 36680576

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Virtual Reality in people with Anxiety and Pain, run by Zealand University Hospital at 1 site in Denmark.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Nov 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Pain at energy level 900 (time frame: The outcome measure will be assessed from the start of the patient&#39;s ESWL treatment until the end of the procedure, with an average treatment duration of approximately 45 minutes.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06616324, which also lists 10 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in