HealthyOkla AchokmaNCT06633939
The Okla Achokma Project
A study testing Behavioral Treatment in people with Healthy and Diet, run by University of Southern Mississippi at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Deep South Native Americans disparately suffer from diabetes, hypertension, and obesity with only 5-10% of Native Americans living past age 65 compared to 15-17% of Whites. Standard lifestyle interventions to improve diet and physical activity behaviors have shown improvement in weight and other cardiometabolic… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Healthy, Diet, Physical Activity
- What is being tested?
- Behavioral Treatment
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 280 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 30 May 2024to 31 Aug 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- men or women who self-identify as Native American
- current resident of the Mississippi study site
- at least 18 years of age or older at the time of enrollment
- BMI ≥ 24kg/m2.
Who cannot join
- individuals with complicated or contraindicated disease diagnosis (i.e., kidney failure or insulin dependent type 2 diabetes) or who are pregnant or within six weeks postpartum
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
The University of Southern Mississippi
Hattiesburg, Mississippi, 39406
About this study
Deep South Native Americans disparately suffer from diabetes, hypertension, and obesity with only 5-10% of Native Americans living past age 65 compared to 15-17% of Whites. Standard lifestyle interventions to improve diet and physical activity behaviors have shown improvement in weight and other cardiometabolic outcomes among Native Americans. The impact of lifestyle interventions on preventable chronic diseases among Native Americans is limited by the exclusion of a multi-level approach with cultural and social enhancements that address the spiritual and social domains of physical health. Therefore, there is an urgent need to determine how spiritual and social domains of health at individual and family levels may advance lifestyle management interventions.
Read the detailed description
The overall objective for this study is to determine the effectiveness of a more holistic intervention targeting the individual and family levels to enhance health outcomes and program engagement among Native Americans in the Deep South compared to standard approaches. Our central hypothesis is that the integration of spiritual and social domains of health into the standard lifestyle intervention approach will significantly improve attendance, retention, and cardiometabolic profiles of Deep South Native Americans. This hypothesis is supported by our own preliminary data that health behaviors of Deep South Native Americans are fostered by family support and hindered by fatalistic attitudes. The rationale that underlies the proposed research is that demonstration of the feasibility and effectiveness of an intervention that integrates spiritual and social domains will provide new opportunities for its continued development as a strategy to improve disease management/prevention best practices in Deep South Native Americans.
The specific aims for the study are to develop a conceptual model to define spiritual factors and spiritually- and socially-enhanced intervention components that could advance lifestyle management interventions among Native Americans in the Deep South and to determine feasibility of lifestyle intervention components and study instruments among Native Americans in the Deep South. The plan is to to pilot recruitment methods, standard lifestyle intervention components, and implementation protocol and procedures to assess acceptability, optimize population engagement, and improve fidelity of delivery.
- Conditions
- Healthy, Diet, Physical Activity
- Being tested
- Behavioral Treatment
- Medical subject headings
- Motor Activity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Behavioral TreatmentBehavioural
The theoretical framework for the Move \& Eat 2 Live intervention is guided by the health belief model (HBM), socioecological model (SEM) and motivational interviewing (MI) approach. Tailoring to the target community will include a standard cultural adaptation that will replace curriculum content and examples with Native American relevant foods, physical activities, and representation in materials. For this study, the intervention will be piloted in the target population and will include the first 5 sessions of the original 12-session program.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Move & Eat 2 Live | Other | 5, 1-hour sessions with an education and motivational component and focused on nutrition, physical activity and healthy weight. Receives: Behavioral: Behavioral Treatment |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Program engagement
Program engagement will be measured by session attendance and program retention. Session attendance will be captured by the percentage of participants that attend each session. Retention will be examined based on three intervals. Interest retention will include the number of participants who completed the interest form versus those who expressed interest but did not complete the interest form, enrollment retention will include the number of participants who enrolled versus expressed interest but did not enroll, baseline retention will include number of participants who completed baseline data collection versus those who enrolled but did not complete baseline data collection.
Measured: From first intervention session to the final (5th) intervention session at 10 weeks
Implementation fidelity
To examine implementation fidelity, the initial four sessions will be randomly selected for in vivo observation by the primary investigator, co-investigators, and/or research staff. The assessment will be guided by a checklist that includes session information (time, place, session length, etc.), session components, and allows for account of session deviations, etc.
Measured: from first intervention session to the final (5th) intervention session at 10 weeks
Secondary outcomes (8)
High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol
Lipid panel will be measured including cholesterol and High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol using a portable analyzer and will require a small blood sample from a simple fingerstick.
Measured: at enrollment
Health-related quality of life
A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey will be used to investigate individual's views about their health. This information will help keep track of how someone feels and how well they are able to do their usual activities.
Ware, J. E., Kosinski, M., \& Keller, S. D. (1996). A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: Construction of Scales and Preliminary Tests of Reliability and Validity. Medical Care, 34(3), 220-233. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3766749
Measured: at enrollment
Blood Pressure
systolic and diastolic blood pressure measured in millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Measured: at enrollment
Self-Efficacy
Validated self-efficacy questionnaire to measure diet and exercise behaviors. Sallis, J.F., Pinski, R.B., Grossman, R.M., Patterson,T.L., and Nader, P.R. (1988). The development of self-efficacy scales for health-related diet and exercise behaviors. Health Education Research, 3, 283-292.
Measured: at enrollment
Spirituality
Holistic assessment instrument focusing on beliefs, intuitions, lifestyle choices, practices, and rituals that represent the human spiritual dimension.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0898010105276180
Measured: at enrollment
Disease Prevention Fatalism
Validated questionnaire to measure beliefs related to death and disease. Disease Prevention Fatalism: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19908102/
Measured: at enrollment
Dietary Intake
DSQ Dietary Screener Questionnaires (DSQ) in the NHANES 2009-10: DSQ https://epi.grants.cancer.gov/nhanes/dietscreen/questionnaires.html#paper
Measured: at enrollment
Physcial Activity
Validated International Physical Activity Questionnaire, short form. IPAQ_English_telephone_short.pdf. (n.d.). https://www.google.com/url?sa=t\&source=web\&rct=j\&opi=89978449\&url=https://osf.io/6yfjf/\&ved=2ahUKEwiKn5S0l_OIAxXyG9AFHVV0OlsQFnoECBoQAQ\&usg=AOvVaw1JvoOLn0pQMye2UUBQt_DX
Measured: at enrollment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Oct 2024
- Study start30 May 2024
- Primary completion6 Aug 2024
- Study completion31 Aug 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for HealthyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 280 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Southern Mississippi
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jennifer Lemacks, University of Southern Mississippi
- Investigators
- Jennifer L Lemacks, PhD, Principal investigator, The University of Southern Mississippi
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06633939
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 22-880-08
- Other IDs
- 1R56HL164335-01A1
- Acronym
- Okla Achokma
- Status last verified
- Sep 2024
- First submitted
- 26 Sep 2024
- Last updated
- 9 Oct 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Lemacks JL, James RE, Abbott L, Choi H, Parker A, Bryant A, Ralston PA, Rigsby AG, Gilner P. The Church Bridge Project: An Academic-Community Perspective of a Church-Based Weight Management Pilot Intervention among Young Adult African Americans. Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2018;12(1S):23-34. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2018.0018.
PubMed 29755046Abbott L, Lemacks J, Greer T. Development and Evaluation of a Measure for Social Support Provided by Friends during Lifestyle Management Programs. Healthcare (Basel). 2022 May 13;10(5):901. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10050901.
PubMed 35628038
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Oct 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Okla Achokma Project
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06633939
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Okla Achokma / 22-880-08
- Conditions
- Healthy, Diet, Physical Activity
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 280 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Southern MississippiUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
- Study start
- 30 May 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 6 Aug 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Aug 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 Oct 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Deep South Native Americans disparately suffer from diabetes, hypertension, and obesity with only 5-10% of Native Americans living past age 65 compared to 15-17% of Whites. Standard lifestyle interventions to improve diet and physical activity behaviors have shown improvement in weight and other cardiometabolic outcomes among Native Americans. The impact of lifestyle interventions on preventable chronic diseases among Native Americans is limited by the exclusion of a multi-level approach with cultural and social enhancements that address the spiritual and social domains of physical health. Therefore, there is an urgent need to determine how spiritual and social domains of health at individual and family levels may advance lifestyle management interventions.
Detailed description
The overall objective for this study is to determine the effectiveness of a more holistic intervention targeting the individual and family levels to enhance health outcomes and program engagement among Native Americans in the Deep South compared to standard approaches. Our central hypothesis is that the integration of spiritual and social domains of health into the standard lifestyle intervention approach will significantly improve attendance, retention, and cardiometabolic profiles of Deep South Native Americans. This hypothesis is supported by our own preliminary data that health behaviors of Deep South Native Americans are fostered by family support and hindered by fatalistic attitudes. The rationale that underlies the proposed research is that demonstration of the feasibility and effectiveness of an intervention that integrates spiritual and social domains will provide new opportunities for its continued development as a strategy to improve disease management/prevention best practices in Deep South Native Americans.
The specific aims for the study are to develop a conceptual model to define spiritual factors and spiritually- and socially-enhanced intervention components that could advance lifestyle management interventions among Native Americans in the Deep South and to determine feasibility of lifestyle intervention components and study instruments among Native Americans in the Deep South. The plan is to to pilot recruitment methods, standard lifestyle intervention components, and implementation protocol and procedures to assess acceptability, optimize population engagement, and improve fidelity of delivery.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Move & Eat 2 Live | Other | Behavioral: Behavioral Treatment5, 1-hour sessions with an education and motivational component and focused on nutrition, physical activity and healthy weight. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- men or women who self-identify as Native American
- current resident of the Mississippi study site
- at least 18 years of age or older at the time of enrollment
- BMI ≥ 24kg/m2.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- individuals with complicated or contraindicated disease diagnosis (i.e., kidney failure or insulin dependent type 2 diabetes) or who are pregnant or within six weeks postpartum
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Behavioral TreatmentThe theoretical framework for the Move \& Eat 2 Live intervention is guided by the health belief model (HBM), socioecological model (SEM) and motivational interviewing (MI) approach. Tailoring to the target community will include a standard cultural adaptation that will replace curriculum content and examples with Native American relevant foods, physical activities, and representation in materials. For this study, the intervention will be piloted in the target population and will include the first 5 sessions of the original 12-session program. | Behavioural | Move & Eat 2 Live |
Primary outcome
Program engagement
Time frame: From first intervention session to the final (5th) intervention session at 10 weeks
Program engagement will be measured by session attendance and program retention. Session attendance will be captured by the percentage of participants that attend each session. Retention will be examined based on three intervals. Interest retention will include the number of participants who completed the interest form versus those who expressed interest but did not complete the interest form, enrollment retention will include the number of participants who enrolled versus expressed interest but did not enroll, baseline retention will include number of participants who completed baseline data collection versus those who enrolled but did not complete baseline data collection.
Implementation fidelity
Time frame: from first intervention session to the final (5th) intervention session at 10 weeks
To examine implementation fidelity, the initial four sessions will be randomly selected for in vivo observation by the primary investigator, co-investigators, and/or research staff. The assessment will be guided by a checklist that includes session information (time, place, session length, etc.), session components, and allows for account of session deviations, etc.
8 secondary outcomes
High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol
Time frame: at enrollment
Health-related quality of life
Time frame: at enrollment
Blood Pressure
Time frame: at enrollment
Self-Efficacy
Time frame: at enrollment
Spirituality
Time frame: at enrollment
Disease Prevention Fatalism
Time frame: at enrollment
Dietary Intake
Time frame: at enrollment
Physcial Activity
Time frame: at enrollment
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Oct 2024.
- Background: PubMed 29755046Lemacks JL, James RE, Abbott L, Choi H, Parker A, Bryant A, Ralston PA, Rigsby AG, Gilner P. The Church Bridge Project: An Academic-Community Perspective of a Church-Based Weight Management Pilot Intervention among Young Adult African Americans. Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2018;12(1S):23-34. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2018.0018.
- Background: PubMed 35628038Abbott L, Lemacks J, Greer T. Development and Evaluation of a Measure for Social Support Provided by Friends during Lifestyle Management Programs. Healthcare (Basel). 2022 May 13;10(5):901. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10050901.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Healthy
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Investigating the Analgesic Potential of (2R,6R)-HNK in Acute Pain in Healthy Volunteers
Healthy Volunteers
RecruitingObservational study
Collection and Analysis of Blood, Bone Marrow, and Buccal Mucosa Samples From Healthy Volunteers
Healthy Volunteers
RecruitingPhase 1
Bioequivalence Study Between YHP2508A and YHR2601 in Healthy Subjects
Healthy Subjects (HS)
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Assessing the Impact of Perceptions of Unpredictability on Objective Measures of Food Consumption and Metabolism
Healthy Volunteer, Obestity
RecruitingObservational study
Relationship Between Great Toe Strength And Symptoms of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (CIPN)
Chemotherapy-induced Peripheral Neuropathy (CIPN), Healthy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jennifer L Lemacks, PhD principal investigator
The University of Southern Mississippi
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Behavioral Treatment in people with Healthy and Diet, run by University of Southern Mississippi at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Oct 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Program engagement (time frame: From first intervention session to the final (5th) intervention session at 10 weeks). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06633939, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Oct 2024.