AzTrials
AzTrials

Mental HealthUPDATE-EDNCT06655467

Understanding Psychological Distress and Therapeutic Environment in the Emergency Department

An observational study of Mental Health and Substance Use (Drugs, Alcohol), run by NHS Fife at 1 site in United Kingdom.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

This research aims to establish the number of patients coming to Emergency Departments (EDs) with issues relating to mental health, alcohol or drugs, or in some form of psychological distress, including those for whom this was not the main reason for attending ED. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 11 years and older
What is being tested?
Routine Care
How many people
398 participants
Where
1 siteUnited Kingdom
Study dates
3 Feb 2025to 18 Mar 2025
Phase
Observational

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 11 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) with issues of mental health, substance use or psychological distress, whether or not this was the primary reason for presentation.

Who may be able to join

  • Issues of mental health AND/OR
  • Issues of substance use AND/OR
  • Psychological distress (this refers to patients without an established mental health or substance use disorder who nonetheless present in a distressed state, where distress is not caused by a readily identifiable and treatable physical condition) AND/OR
  • Where the treating ED team feel the patient would benefit from some form of mental health or addictions assessment or intervention, whether carried out by ED staff, specialist services or third sector agencies.

Who cannot join

  • Patients aged 10 and under.
  • Patients with distress caused by a physical condition, relieved by appropriate treatment.
  • Delirium, unless caused by a mental health- or substance-related disorder.
  • Patients with alcohol intoxication alone, without other evidence of harmful use of alcohol and without evidence of psychological distress.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Rajendra Raman, MBBChir contact

+447803814111

rajendra.raman@nhs.scot

United Kingdom1 site
  • Victoria Hospital

    Kirkcaldy, Fife, KY2 5AH

    Rajendra Raman, MBBChir, 07803814111, rajendra.raman@nhs.scot

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

This research aims to establish the number of patients coming to Emergency Departments (EDs) with issues relating to mental health, alcohol or drugs, or in some form of psychological distress, including those for whom this was not the main reason for attending ED. We will collect anonymous information on age, gender, ethnicity, when and how they came to the ED, where and how they are cared for whilst in the ED, and what happens to them afterwards. With this information we hope to build a better picture of these patients so we can go on to design and test ways to improve their care in the future.

Read the detailed description

Those presenting to the Emergency Department with mental ill health, substance misuse or in crisis have a worse patient journey than those presenting with physical issues alone. They wait twice as long to be seen1 and have poorer experiences. Recognising this, the RCEM/James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership has placed mental health at the top of the Emergency Medicine research agenda. The question asked is: "How can care for mental health patients be optimised, whether presenting with either/both physical and mental health needs; including appropriate space to see patients, staff training, early recognition of symptoms, prioritisation, and patient experience?" An explicit research agenda has yet to emerge from this very broad question. At the most basic level, the patient population needs to be defined, the scale of the problem quantified, and current practice patterns and variation described in detail.

It has been estimated that the proportion of ED attendances related to "mental health disorders" is 4%. However these estimates are derived from retrospective data and are dependent on accurate diagnosis coding. There is a lack of data on dual diagnoses, which Scotland's Mental Health strategy has outlined as a key area for action, recommending opportunities to "pilot improved arrangements for dual diagnosis for people with problem substance use and mental health diagnosis". A literature review aiming to build a 'Typology' of psychiatric emergency services in the UK emphasised wide variation in provision and heterogeneity of models. No prospective study has yet quantified this variation in terms of waiting times, types of assessment offered, disposition and outcomes. The success of other large observational studies on ED presentations such as syncope, acute aortic syndromes and frailty suggests that a similar methodology could be applied to mental health and related presentations.

Being tested
Routine Care
Medical subject headings
Psychological Well-Being, Substance-Related Disorders

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Routine CareBehavioural

    Also called Standard Care

    This study involves no change in clinical care and no study specific interventions for participants.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Proportion fo ED attendance related to issues of mental health, substance use or psychological distress

    Number of patients meeting eligibility criteria, expressed as a proportion of all ED attendances at each site during the study period.

    Measured: 7 days

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. Proportion of patients physically in ED who meet inclusion criteria at any one time

    Proportion of patients physically in the ED who meet inclusion criteria at any given time over the 7-day study period.

    Measured: 7 days

  2. Comparison with coding data

    Proportion of total ED patients meeting inclusion criteria during the study period compared with coding data from a recent historical cohort at one site (NHS Fife).

    Measured: 7 days

  3. Admission rate

    Proportion of patients meeting inclusion criteria who are admitted to hospital on an informal basis, and proportion admitted under detention.

    Measured: 7 days

  4. Length of stay

    Mean, standard deviation (or nonparametric equivalents) and range of lengths of ED and hospital stay for patients meeting inclusion criteria.

    Measured: 30 days

  5. Specialist mental health or addictions input in ED

    Proportion of patients meeting inclusion criteria who receive specialist mental health or addictions input whilst in ED.

    Measured: 7 days

  6. Specialist referrals from ED

    Proportion of patients meeting inclusion criteria who are referred by the ED team for specialist mental health or addictions input after ED discharge.

    Measured: 7 days

  7. 7-day and 30-day follow-up

    Proportion of patients meeting inclusion criteria who return to ED, are admitted to hospital or die within 7 and 30 days of index ED visit.

    Measured: 30 days

  8. Clinician Confidence Scale

    Self-reported confidence of ED clinicians (Visual Analog Scale) in managing an individual patient presenting with issues of mental health, substance use or psychological distress. Values may range from 0 (no confidence at all) to 10 (complete confidence).

    Measured: 7 days

  9. Resource Availability Scale

    Perception of resource availability (self-reported by ED clinicians on a Visual Analog Scale) for managing an individual patient presenting with issues of mental health, substance use or psychological distress. Values may range from 0 (complete lack of resources) to 10 (all resources available).

    Measured: 7 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Oct 2024
  2. Study start3 Feb 2025 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion18 Mar 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completion18 Mar 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
398 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06655467
Sponsor's protocol ID
24/EM/0245
Acronym
UPDATE-ED
Status last verified
Dec 2024
First submitted
21 Oct 2024
Last updated
12 Dec 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes

Publications

  • European Taskforce on Geriatric Emergency Medicine (ETGEM) collaborators. Prevalence of Frailty in European Emergency Departments (FEED): an international flash mob study. Eur Geriatr Med. 2024 Apr;15(2):463-470. doi: 10.1007/s41999-023-00926-3. Epub 2024 Feb 10.

    PubMed 38340282
  • McLatchie R, Reed MJ, Freeman N, Parker RA, Wilson S, Goodacre S, Cowan A, Boyle J, Clarke B, Clarke E; DAShED investigators. Diagnosis of Acute Aortic Syndrome in the Emergency Department (DAShED) study: an observational cohort study of people attending the emergency department with symptoms consistent with acute aortic syndrome. Emerg Med J. 2024 Feb 20;41(3):136-144. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2023-213266.

    PubMed 37945311
  • Reed MJ, Karuranga S, Kearns D, Alawiye S, Clarke B, Mockel M, Karamercan M, Janssens K, Riesgo LG, Torrecilla FM, Golea A, Fernandez Cejas JA, Lupan-Muresan EM, Zaimi E, Nuernberger A, Rennet O, Skjaerbaek C, Polyzogopoulou E, Imecz J, Groff P, Camilleri R, Cimpoesu D, Jovic M, Miro O, Anderson R, Laribi S; SEED investigators. Management of syncope in the Emergency Department: a European prospective cohort study (SEED). Eur J Emerg Med. 2024 Apr 1;31(2):136-146. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001101. Epub 2023 Nov 27.

    PubMed 38015745
  • Odejimi O, Bagchi D, Tadros G. Typology of psychiatric emergency services in the United Kingdom: a narrative literature review. BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Dec 10;20(1):587. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02983-5.

    PubMed 33302905
  • Scottish Government (2017) Mental Health Strategy: 2017-2027. Crown Copyright. Available at: https://www.gov.scot/binaries/content/documents/govscot/publications/strategy-plan/2017/03/mental-health-strategy-2017-2027/documents/00516047-pdf/00516047-pdf/govscot%3Adocument/00516047.pdf

  • Barratt H, Rojas-Garcia A, Clarke K, Moore A, Whittington C, Stockton S, Thomas J, Pilling S, Raine R. Epidemiology of Mental Health Attendances at Emergency Departments: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS One. 2016 Apr 27;11(4):e0154449. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154449. eCollection 2016.

    PubMed 27120350
  • Baracaia S, McNulty D, Baldwin S, Mytton J, Evison F, Raine R, Giacco D, Hutchings A, Barratt H. Mental health in hospital emergency departments: cross-sectional analysis of attendances in England 2013/2014. Emerg Med J. 2020 Dec;37(12):744-751. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2019-209105. Epub 2020 Nov 5.

    PubMed 33154100
  • Royal College of Emergency Medicine (2022) James Lind Alliance Emergency Medicine Priority Setting Partnership Refresh 2022. Available at: https://rcem.ac.uk/research-priorities/

  • Digel Vandyk A, Young L, MacPhee C, Gillis K. Exploring the Experiences of Persons Who Frequently Visit the Emergency Department for Mental Health-Related Reasons. Qual Health Res. 2018 Mar;28(4):587-599. doi: 10.1177/1049732317746382. Epub 2017 Dec 12.

    PubMed 29231128
  • Clarke DE, Dusome D, Hughes L. Emergency department from the mental health client's perspective. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2007 Apr;16(2):126-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0349.2007.00455.x.

    PubMed 17348963
  • Royal College of Emergency Medicine (2022) RCEM Acute Insight Series: Mental Health Emergency Care. Available at: https://rcem.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/RCEM-Acute-Insight-Series-Mental-Health-Emergency-Care.pdf

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in