AzTrials
AzTrials

Sports Physical TherapyNCT06658288

Comparative Effects of Rebound Training and Theraband Resistance Exercise in Badminton Players

A study testing Rebound Training and Theraband resistance exercise in people with Sports Physical Therapy, run by Riphah International University at 1 site in Pakistan.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Comparative Effects of Rebound Training and Theraband Resistance Exercise in Badminton Players With Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 25 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Sports Physical Therapy
What is being tested?
Rebound Training and Theraband resistance exercise
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
24 participants
Where
1 sitePakistan
Study dates
24 Apr 2024to 10 Dec 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 25 years
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Females
  • Age 18 to 25 years
  • Positive Patellofemoral Compression Test ( Pain is in around the patella and back of knee cap) With playing experience of 3 years will be included
  • Minimum Sports activity 1 hour 4 times a week

Who cannot join

  • Recreational players
  • Players with recent injury in past 6 months
  • Any musculoskeletal and neurological problem
  • Player addicted to any drug or alcohol will be excluded

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Pakistan1 site
  • Pakistan Sports Board

    Lahore, Punjab Province, 05450

Other trials in Pakistan

About this study

Official title: Comparative Effects of Rebound Training and Theraband Resistance Exercise on Agility, Power and Dynamic Balance in Badminton Players With Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome

Comparative Effects of Rebound Training and Theraband Resistance Exercise in Badminton Players With Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome

Read the detailed description

Comparative Effects of Rebound Training and Theraband Resistance Exercise on agility, power and dynamic balance in Badminton Players With Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome

Being tested
Rebound Training, Theraband resistance exercise
Keywords
Agility, Dynamic balance, Power, Patellofemoral Pain
Medical subject headings
Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Rebound TrainingOther

    12 participants will be in experimental group A giving them rebound training.

  • Theraband resistance exerciseOther

    12 participants will be in experimental group A giving them theraband resistance exercise with different band resistnce.

Study groups in NCT06658288
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group AExperimental12 Participants will be in experimental group A. They will perform rebound training for six weeks. Measure all values before giving them protocol and after protocol.
Receives: Other: Rebound Training
Group BExperimental12 Participants will be in experimental group B. They will perform theraband resistance exercise for six weeks. Measure all values before giving them protocol and after protocol.
Receives: Other: Theraband resistance exercise

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Numeric Pain Rating Scale

    Numeric Pain Rating Scale NPRS is based on 11-point numerical rating scale for determining pain intensity, 0(no pain) to 10(worst pain imaginable) pain intensity .NRS pain has high validity and reliability (β = 0.42 [95% CI 0.04, 0.80]

    Measured: 6 weeks

  2. Agility T Test

    Agility will be measured by the agility T - tests high intra-trail reliability of the test (ICC=0.98). The participants were instructed to run 9.14 meters from the starting line to the first cone, touch the tip with their right hand, shuffle 4.57 meters to the left to the second cone, shuffle 9.14 meters to the right to the third cone, touch with their right hand, shuffle 4.57 meters to the left to the middle cone, touch with their left hand, and then back pedal to the starting line.

    Measured: 6 Weeks

  3. Vertical Jump Power Test

    To mark the wall at the height of their jump, the participant applies chalk to the tips of their fingers. After standing away from the wall, the individual uses both arms and legs to help project their body upwards and jumps as high as they can. At the peak of the jump, try to make contact with the wall. Power will be measured by Sargent Test. Vertical Jump test is a very common test for measuring explosive leg power intra rater class reliability ICC = 0.903 to 0.934)

    Measured: 6 Weeks

  4. 40-Yd Speed Test

    Speed will be measured by 40-Yd Sprint Test. The test involves running a single maximum sprint over 40 yards, with the time recorded. The aim of this test will be determine 40-Yd Sprint. Sprints of 40 yd were used to determine quickness ICC > 0.987

    Measured: 6 Weeks

  5. Star Excursion Dynamic Balance

    The SEBT is a functional test that incorporates a single-leg stance on one leg with maximum reach of the opposite leg. The SEBT is performed with the subject standing at the center of a grid placed on the floor, with 8 lines extending at 45° increments from the center of the grid. The 8 lines positioned on the grid are labeled according to the direction of excursion relative to the stance leg. The plane was constructed in a facility with the help of protractor and adhesive tape on the hard tile floor. Dynamic balance check with balance with Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT) the intra class correlation coefficients ( 0.86 to 0.92)

    Measured: 6 Weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Oct 2024
  2. Study start24 Apr 2024
  3. Primary completion24 Nov 2024 (estimated)
  4. Study completion10 Dec 2024 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Randomized clinical trial
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
24 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06658288
Sponsor's protocol ID
REC/RCR&AHS/24/0413
Status last verified
Oct 2024
First submitted
24 Oct 2024
Last updated
26 Oct 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Willy RW, Hoglund LT, Barton CJ, Bolgla LA, Scalzitti DA, Logerstedt DS, Lynch AD, Snyder-Mackler L, McDonough CM. Patellofemoral Pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2019 Sep;49(9):CPG1-CPG95. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2019.0302.

    PubMed 31475628
  • Sisk D, Fredericson M. Update of Risk Factors, Diagnosis, and Management of Patellofemoral Pain. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2019 Dec;12(4):534-541. doi: 10.1007/s12178-019-09593-z.

    PubMed 31773479
  • Lee JH, Jang KM, Kim E, Rhim HC, Kim HD. Static and Dynamic Quadriceps Stretching Exercises in Patients With Patellofemoral Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Sports Health. 2021 Sep-Oct;13(5):482-489. doi: 10.1177/1941738121993777. Epub 2021 Feb 20.

    PubMed 33615901
  • Lee JH, Shin KH, Han SB, Sun Hwang K, Lee SJ, Jang KM. Prospective comparative study between knee alignment-oriented static and dynamic balance exercise in patellofemoral pain syndrome patients with dynamic knee valgus. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Sep 16;101(37):e30631. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030631.

    PubMed 36123932
  • Zambarano EK, Bazett-Jones DM, de Oliveira Silva D, Barton CJ, Glaviano NR. Confidence and Knowledge of Athletic Trainers in Managing Patellofemoral Pain. J Athl Train. 2022 Jan 1;57(1):79-91. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-0279.21.

    PubMed 35040987
  • Emamvirdi M, Letafatkar A, Khaleghi Tazji M. The Effect of Valgus Control Instruction Exercises on Pain, Strength, and Functionality in Active Females With Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome. Sports Health. 2019 May/Jun;11(3):223-237. doi: 10.1177/1941738119837622. Epub 2019 Apr 29.

    PubMed 31034336
  • Saad MC, Vasconcelos RA, Mancinelli LVO, Munno MSB, Liporaci RF, Grossi DB. Is hip strengthening the best treatment option for females with patellofemoral pain? A randomized controlled trial of three different types of exercises. Braz J Phys Ther. 2018 Sep-Oct;22(5):408-416. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2018.03.009. Epub 2018 Apr 4.

    PubMed 29661570
  • Tramontano M, Pagnotta S, Lunghi C, Manzo C, Manzo F, Consolo S, Manzo V. Assessment and Management of Somatic Dysfunctions in Patients With Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2020 Mar 1;120(3):165-173. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2020.029.

    PubMed 32091560
  • Pereira PM, Baptista JS, Conceicao F, Duarte J, Ferraz J, Costa JT. Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome Risk Associated with Squats: A Systematic Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 28;19(15):9241. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159241.

    PubMed 35954598
  • da Silva Boitrago MV, de Mello NN, Barin FR, Junior PL, de Souza Borges JH, Oliveira M. Effects of proprioceptive exercises and strengthening on pain and functionality for patellofemoral pain syndrome in women: A randomized controlled trial. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2021 Apr 19;18:94-99. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2021.04.017. eCollection 2021 Jul.

    PubMed 33996453
  • Ramirez-Campillo R, Alvarez C, Gentil P, Loturco I, Sanchez-Sanchez J, Izquierdo M, Moran J, Nakamura FY, Chaabene H, Granacher U. Sequencing Effects of Plyometric Training Applied Before or After Regular Soccer Training on Measures of Physical Fitness in Young Players. J Strength Cond Res. 2020 Jul;34(7):1959-1966. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002525.

    PubMed 29570574
  • Deng N, Soh KG, Abdullah B, Huang D, Xiao W, Liu H. Effects of plyometric training on technical skill performance among athletes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2023 Jul 17;18(7):e0288340. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288340. eCollection 2023.

    PubMed 37459333
  • Yalfani A, Ahmadi M, Asgarpoor A. The effect of kinetic factors of dynamic knee valgus on patellofemoral pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2024 Jan;37:246-253. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2023.11.001. Epub 2023 Nov 14.

    PubMed 38432813

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Rebound Training and Theraband resistance exercise in people with Sports Physical Therapy, run by Riphah International University at 1 site in Pakistan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Oct 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Pakistan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Numeric Pain Rating Scale (time frame: 6 weeks). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06658288, which also lists 13 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Oct 2024; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in