AzTrials
AzTrials

Pancreatic NeoplasmsNCT06661135

Open Versus Total Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy

A study testing TLPD total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy and OPD open pancreaticoduodenectomy in people with Pancreatic Neoplasms and Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy, run by Cairo University at 1 site in Egypt.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn more about Total Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy ( TLPD ) which is performed for participants with pancreatic tumors using the laparoscope. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 years and older
What is being tested?
TLPD total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy and OPD open pancreaticoduodenectomy
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
48 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
1 Sep 2022to 30 Dec 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients presenting to the outpatient clinic of Kasr Alainy Hospitals with pancreatic head tumors, duodenal tumors, ampullary, or periampullary tumors who were candidates for either open or laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy
  • Patients who accepted to participate in the study.

Who cannot join

  • Patients who were deemed inoperable or irresectable tumors by preoperative investigations.
  • Patients with history of previous laparotomies.
  • Patients with complex ventral hernias.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Egypt1 site
  • Kasralainy school of medicine , Cairo university

    Cairo

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: Total Laparoscopic Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy: a Prospective Comparative Clinical Study

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn more about Total Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy ( TLPD ) which is performed for participants with pancreatic tumors using the laparoscope.

TLPD is an operation that includes excision of the tumor with adjacent parts of the head of the pancreas, the duodenum and the part of the external biliary system . In the final step during surgery, and to reconnect the bowel after excision of the tumor, multiple anastomoses or connections will be made by the surgeon.

Read more

To get valid results , the investigators performed this randomized controlled trial that compare TLPD with the traditional technique used to remove these tumors through open pancreaticoduodenectomy ( OPD ).

The main questions this study aims to answer are:

Is TLPD superior to open pancraticoduodenectomy ( OPD ) regarding the adequacy of surgical tumor excision ?

Is TLPD lower than OPD regarding the early complications after surgery ?

Researchers will compare participants receiving TLPD with participants receiving OPD regarding :

The time of the operation. The amount of blood lost during surgery. Complications that may happen during or after surgery. Time of recovery after surgery. Duration to amputation. Duration of hospital stay. The adequacy of resection .

Read the detailed description

Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is a major, complex abdominal surgery that involves removing the pancreatic head together with the common bile duct (CBD) and duodenum. It is usually associated with complications that can severely affect patients' health and lead to mortality.

Pancreaticoduodenectomy is mainly indicated for patients with malignant masses in the head of pancreas and the periampullary region and can be the treatment solution for these patients, providing them with a cure or prolonging their survival. Pancreaticoduodenectomy can also be indicated for some pancreatic cystic neoplasms, particularly intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) that can turn malignant, neuroendocrine tumors, metastatic lesions to the pancreas, gastrointestinal stromal tumors, pancreatitis, and major pancreatic injury.

Pancreaticoduodenectomy was not generally accepted until the report introduced by Whipple in 1935 about his successful two-stage PD.. After about five years, Whipple conducted the first anatomic one-stage PD, including an antrectomy and a complete duodenectomy for a pancreatic head tumor.

Pancreaticoduodenectomy has been traditionally performed with an open approach. In 1994, Gagner and Pomp described laparoscopic PD (LPD). In their follow-up study, laparoscopic PD was concluded to have a high conversion rate with no advantages over open PD (OPD). Since then, laparoscopic approaches have been growingly reported, with ongoing research aiming to assess if LPD, being a minimally invasive approach, can improve postoperative morbidity. Nevertheless, LPD is still not broadly accepted. This study aimed to determine the advantages and disadvantages of performing total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy compared to the open approach.

Being tested
TLPD total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy, OPD open pancreaticoduodenectomy
Keywords
Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy, Open vs laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy, Pancreatic neoplasm surgery in developing countries
Medical subject headings
Pancreatic Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • TLPD total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomyProcedure or surgery

    It includes removal of the pancreatic or duodenal tumors using the laparoscopy

  • OPD open pancreaticoduodenectomyProcedure or surgery

    It includes removal of the pancreatic or duodenal tumors using the open technique

Study groups in NCT06661135
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
TLPDExperimentalThis is the group that will receive laparoscopic pancreaicoduodenectomy trocars were inserted (between 5 and 6 trocars were required) and pneumoperitoneum induction was done. The surgeries were performed as previously described . Single loop reconstruction was adopted which involved the formation of all three anastomoses (pancreatico-jejeunostomy, hepatico-jejeunostomy, and gastro-jejeunostomy) on a single jejunal loop. The distance between the hepatico-jejeunostomy, and gastro-jejeunostomy was adjusted at 60 cm for all patients.
Receives: Procedure: TLPD total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy
OPDActive comparatorthis group will receive open PD In the OPD group, a bilateral abdominal subcost incision was performed for open surgery
Receives: Procedure: OPD open pancreaticoduodenectomy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Length of hospital stay

    Time spent in hospital in days after surgery

    Measured: From the date of surgery of every participant to the date of its discharge from hospital or death whichever comes first, assessed up to 3 months .

  2. Length of postoperative surgical ICU stay

    Length of postoperative surgical ICU stay In days

    Measured: From the date of admission to SICU ( surgical intensive care unit ) after surgery to the date of discharge to ward or death whichever comes first, assessed up to 3 months .

  3. Amount of blood loss

    Amount of blood lost intraoperative assessed in milliliters

    Measured: From start of surgery till skin closure

  4. Amount of intraoperative blood transfusion

    Amount of intraoperative PRBC units transfused intraoperative

    Measured: From start of surgery of every participant till skin closure

  5. 30-day mortality

    Reporting Death if happens in the first month postoperatively

    Measured: From the date of surgery till one month after

  6. Operative time in minutes

    Time spent in surgery

    Measured: From time of skin incision till time of skin closure

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Severity of Postoperative pain

    Assessing postoperative pain daily postoperative using visual analogue score that is a scale of grades from 0 to 10 , with 0 means no pain perceived and 10 indicates the worst pain possible perceived

    Measured: From awakening after surgery ( day 0 ) till ( day 7 ) afterwards

  2. Gastrointestinal recovery ( time to tolerate oral intake)

    Time to tolerate oral fluid intake without vomiting . Usually the participants were instructed to take fluids on day 2 after surgery and continue if tolerating and no vomiting occurred for one complete day

    Measured: From Day two ( D2 ) after surgery for every participant till the date of tolerating oral fluids without vomiting for one complete day , up to two Weeks after surgery

  3. Lymph node yield after surgery

    Number of lymph nodes harvested

    Measured: It takes 5 days after surgery for the pathological assessment to be completed

  4. Ratio of positive lymph nodes to total number of lymph nodes harvested

    Ratio of positive lymph nodes to total number of lymph nodes harvested

    Measured: It takes 5 days after surgery for the pathological assessment to be completed

  5. State of resection margins after pathological assessment

    State of specimen margins ( free or infiltrated by Tumor )

    Measured: It takes 5 days after surgery for the pathological assessment to be completed

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Oct 2024
  2. Study start1 Sep 2022
  3. Primary completion30 Dec 2023
  4. Study completion30 Dec 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
The included patients were equally randomized into two groups: the OPD group, which included patients that would undergo the traditional open procedure, and the LPD group, which included patients that would be subjected to the laparoscopic approach.
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
48 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06661135
Sponsor's protocol ID
Pancreaticoduodenectomy
Status last verified
Oct 2024
First submitted
18 Oct 2024
Last updated
28 Oct 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: All scientific individual participant data will be ready for sharing including ( age, sex, associated commorbidies, size of the tumor , time of surgery, type of surgery, hospital stay , SICU stay , resection margin results , units of blood transfusion ,….) abiding in the same time to our local research ethical committee rules

Publications

  • Mostafa MS, Hamour D, Aiad GAN, Balamoun HA, Khattab MH, Shazly MN, Nageeb ME, Mohamed AAA. Laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy: a pilot randomized trial in a developing African country. Surg Endosc. 2026 Feb;40(2):1641-1650. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-12377-x. Epub 2025 Dec 4.

    PubMed 41345531

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing TLPD total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy and OPD open pancreaticoduodenectomy in people with Pancreatic Neoplasms and Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy, run by Cairo University at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Oct 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Length of hospital stay (time frame: From the date of surgery of every participant to the date of its discharge from hospital or death whichever comes first, assessed up to 3 months .). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06661135, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Oct 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in