Neuromotor ImpairmentsMultiTECHChildNCT06666829
Multicenter Study That Offers New Solutions for Paediatric Rehabilitation by Proposing a Rehabilitation Plan Based on Each Child's Needs Using New Technological and Robotic Devices, Combined Among Them.
A study testing Multidomain intervention and Single domain intervention in people with Neuromotor Impairments, run by IRCCS Fondazione Stella Maris at 6 sites in Italy.
Trial summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to demonstrate the efficacy of multi domain robotic and technological rehabilitation on everyday life and satisfaction in children with neuromotor conditions. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 5 to 21 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Neuromotor Impairments
- What is being tested?
- Multidomain intervention and Single domain intervention
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 194 participants
- Where
- 6 sitesItaly
- Study dates
- 4 Nov 2024to 31 Jan 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 5 to 21 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Confirmed diagnosis of developmental disorder and/or disability, either congenital or acquired;
- Age between 5 and 21 years at the time of recruitment;
- Verbal and/or non-verbal reasoning abilities > 70 or > 5th percentile, as assessed by standardized tests such as Colored Progressive Matrices (CPM), WISC-IV or WISC-V, WPPSI-III or WPPSI-IV, Leiter-3, Griffiths III.
Who cannot join
- Presence of severe comorbidities and/or behavioral/cognitive disorders that prevent adequate patient compliance with both conventional and robotic rehabilitation treatment (severe intellectual disability);
- Uncontrolled epilepsy;
- Presence of severe sensory deficits;
- Patients who have undergone orthopedic functional surgery or rhizotomy and/or botulinum toxin treatment in the last 6 months;
- Involvement of the peripheral nervous system
Trial locations and contacts
6 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
6 sites in 1 country
Italy6 sites, 6 recruiting
- Recruiting
IRCCS Eugenio Medea
Bosisio Parini, Lecco, 23842
Dott.ssa Elena Beretta, 031877589, elena.beretta@lanostrafamiglia.it
- Not yet recruiting
IRCCS Fondazione Stella Maris
Calambrone, Pisa, 56128
prof.ssa Sgandurra, 050886284, giuseppina.sgandurra@fsm.unipi.it
- Not yet recruiting
IRCCS Giannina Gaslini
Genova, Genova, 16147
Dott.ssa Alessia Aiello, 01056363137/01056362292, alessia.aiello@gaslini.org
- Not yet recruiting
Fondazione Don Gnocchi IRCCS centro "Santa Maria Nascente"
Milan, Milano, 20148
Dott.ssa Sara Da Pian, 02 40308279, sdapian@dongnocchi.it
- Not yet recruiting
IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Naz.le C.Mondino
Pavia, Pavia, 27100
Dott.ssa Sabrina Signorini, 0382380233, sabrina.signorini@mondino.it
- Not yet recruiting
Fondazione Don Gnocchi IRCCS centro "S.Maria al Mare"
Salerno, Salerno, 84131
Dott. Domiziano Tarantino, 089334425, dtarantino@dongnocchi.it
About this study
Official title: Innovative Paths to Paediatric Care: A Multicenter Study on the Efficacy of Multi-Domain Technological and Robotic Rehabilitation.
The goal of this clinical trial is to demonstrate the efficacy of multi domain robotic and technological rehabilitation on everyday life and satisfaction in children with neuromotor conditions. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Will we have significant changes using the COPM in children taking part in the sperimental group?
- The children who will undergo the multidomain treatment will also experience functional improvements in individual areas?
- Thy type of treatment will improve motivation, active participation and satisfaction in children?
Read more
Researcher will compare the multidomain treatment to standard care proposed by the included clinical centers: single domain rehabilitation with one innovative device. Both groups will undergo also conventional multidomain therapy.
This will be done to see if using a holistic approach, and including every need of the child in the rehabilitation plan, can lead to greater improvements in quality of life compared to the control group.
Participant will:
- Be evaluated 3 times with clinical outcome measures
- Take part in a rehabilitation program, at least 20 x 2hours sessions treatment, organized in:
- 4 weeks, 5 times per week
- 7 weeks, 3 times per week
Read the detailed description
- The sample size was determined considering the primary outcome (the change in COPM): the superiority of robotic treatment compared to conventional treatment; a power of 80%; a number of groups equal to 2; a number of measurements equal to 3; and an effect size of 0.1. Based on these parameters, a sample size of 162 patients (81 per group) is obtained. Additionally, considering a dropout rate of 20%, a total sample size of 194 patients is required.
- For each recruited subject, a specific checklist (CRF) will be completed to collect the demographic, clinical, and technological data required by the study. All collected data will be pseudonymized (using a technique that modifies and masks personal and sensitive data to prevent it from being directly and easily attributed to an individual), in accordance with current privacy regulations. This will allow for regular monitoring of the study's progress, particularly regarding the number of subjects enrolled and recruited in the different phases, the evaluation tests conducted, adherence to the study, and the treatment protocols implemented.
- A high adherence to the study is anticipated, especially if the children involved receive treatment during the care period in rehabilitation facilities, in compliance with current regulations. To ensure the quality and consistency of the intervention, a careful assessment of adherence will be conducted. This assessment will be carried out by an independent team of clinical reviewers, who will regularly monitor treatment sessions. The reviewers will then implement targeted strategies to maintain and improve adherence, including periodic training sessions for the staff involved and timely feedback directed to the therapists in both study groups. A diary will also be maintained regarding the treatments performed by each patient to monitor adherence to the proposed treatment.
- Regarding the collection of data obtained from standardized clinical evaluations, each subject will be assigned a numeric ID code in accordance with current privacy regulations, allowing for the preservation and sharing of data in a completely anonymous form with other participating centers. The list linking the assigned code to each child's name will be kept by the principal investigator and stored in a locked cabinet. Only the principal investigator and other researchers involved in the project will have access to this information.
Similarly, information obtained during the rehabilitation phase from technological tools will be stored and shared with other participating centers in a completely anonymous manner, using the same numeric code previously defined. The data collected throughout the study, excluding the subject's name, will be recorded, processed, and stored for at least seven (7) years after the conclusion of the study, along with the assigned code, on password-protected hard drives stored in a physically secured location or within protected electronic archives (Research Electronic Data Capture (RedCap)), accessible only to the principal investigator and authorized researchers. After seven years, the data will be destroyed.
All collected information will not be processed or used for purposes other than those indicated in the study's objectives, nor for direct profit, and will not be communicated or transferred to unauthorized third parties.
Personal data will be collected and processed in accordance with the principle of data minimization and in compliance with all general principles outlined in Article 5 of the GDPR. Data, particularly personal and health-related data, will be processed only to the extent necessary in relation to the objectives of the trial, in accordance with EU Regulation 2016/679 (GDPR) and Legislative Decree No. 101 of August 10, 2018.
At the time of data collection, whether obtained from standardized clinical evaluations or from device reports, the Data Controllers will ensure that the collected data is pseudonymized by identifying the recruited subjects with codes or adopting other solutions compliant with point 5.4 of the Privacy Authority Provision No. 146/2019. The use of encryption techniques allows for the storage and processing of the data subject's information in a way that prevents identification by any external person. Only the Project Manager at each center and authorized personnel can link each code to the name of the participating subject.
•Regarding any events to be reported, the mode and timing of reporting will adhere to the obligations imposed by EU Regulation 2017/745 (Article 80) and the MDCG Guideline 2020-10/1 ("Safety reporting in clinical investigations of medical devices under Regulation (EU) 2017/745").
A specific insurance policy will be established, which will be activated immediately before the start of the clinical trial. Insurance quotes have been requested and are currently under evaluation. The policy will comply with the provisions of the Ministerial Decree of July 14, 2009, which guarantees specific coverage for damages caused to subjects by the trial activities throughout its duration, covering the civil liability of the investigator and the sponsor, without excluding damages unintentionally caused as a result of an accidental event and/or attributable to negligence, imprudence, or incompetence.
•The collected data will be presented using descriptive statistics, such as mean and standard deviation for numerical variables, and percentages for categorical variables.
The population will be defined to include patients in the multidomain treatment group or the control group (monodomain). The analyzable population will be defined by excluding patients who are not eligible for entry and those who do not receive the full treatment (due to treatment interruption for any reason). The primary endpoint at the end of treatment will be compared between the two treatment groups.
For the primary outcome, a planned subgroup analysis will be conducted to assess the presence of treatment effect modifiers. Continuous secondary outcomes will be analyzed in the population. All tests will be two-tailed with a significance level of 5%, and effect estimates will include a 95% confidence interval (CI).
Categorical outcomes will be reported as proportions with 95% CIs and compared using appropriate statistical tests. Similar analysis will be conducted to demonstrate any improvement in parameters measured during the follow-up (T2). This analysis will include subjects who completed the treatment, representing the population to be studied in the months following the completion of the treatment.
- Conditions
- Neuromotor Impairments
- Being tested
- Multidomain intervention, Single domain intervention
- Keywords
- Children, Multidomain, Robotic rehabilitation, Technological rehabilitation, Innovative
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Multidomain interventionOther
treatment plan using combination of more than one technological or robotic devices, choosing from: Virtual Reality Rehabilitation System (VRSS), Khymeia TR; HomeKIT Khymeia; VRSS Khymeia EVO; Myro® Tyromotion; Diego Tyromotion; Tyrostation Tyromotion; Pablo® Tyromotion; Amadeo Tyromotion; Lexo® Tyromotion; Humaware MObile RoboT for upper Limb NeurOortho Rehabilitation (MOTORE); Humanware Upper Limb TRAcker(ULTRA+); Gloreha Sinfonia plus; C-Mill Motek; Gait Real Time Analysis Laboratory (GRAIL) Motek Medical; Nirvana BTS; Agilik; Armeo Spring pediatrico Hocoma; Lokomat ® Hocoma; Hand Tutor, Leg Tutor, Arm Tutor (MediTouch); Care Lab; Dessintey IVS3; Rehacom Hasomed; Hunova; GEO System (Kineo).
In this way, the child will be taken care of holistically, considering their needs from a motor, cognitive, and speech therapy perspective. The treatment plan will also include a conventional multi-level rehabilitation program.
Single domain interventionDevice
Treatment plan using only one of these technological or robotic device:
Virtual Reality Rehabilitation System (VRSS), Khymeia TR; HomeKIT Khymeia; VRSS Khymeia EVO; Myro® Tyromotion; Diego Tyromotion; Tyrostation Tyromotion; Pablo® Tyromotion; Amadeo Tyromotion; Lexo® Tyromotion; Humaware MObile RoboT for upper Limb NeurOortho Rehabilitation (MOTORE); Humanware Upper Limb TRAcker(ULTRA+); Gloreha Sinfonia plus; C-Mill Motek; Gait Real Time Analysis Laboratory (GRAIL) Motek Medical; Nirvana BTS; Agilik; Armeo Spring pediatrico Hocoma; Lokomat ® Hocoma; Hand Tutor, Leg Tutor, Arm Tutor (MediTouch); Care Lab; Dessintey IVS3; Rehacom Hasomed; Hunova; GEO System (Kineo).
Technological rehabilitation will focus on the main specific need for the child, it'll be chosen individually. The treatment plan will also include a conventional multi-level rehabilitation program.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Multidomain treatment group | Experimental | Participant will undergo a Multidomain rehabilitation treatment using the combination of two or more innovative technological and robotic devices.This will also be associated with the conventional rehabilitation Receives: Other: Multidomain intervention |
| Single domain treatment group | Active comparator | Participant will undergo a Single domain rehabilitation treatment using only one innovative technological or robotic device.This will also be associated with the conventional rehabilitation Receives: Device: Single domain intervention |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM)
Assessment tool used in occupational therapy to evaluate an individual's performance and satisfaction in both daily and personal activities. The COPM focuses on activities that are meaningful to the assessed person, allowing them to identify areas where they wish to improve their abilities or participation. This tool helps therapists better understand their patients' needs and desires, enabling them to plan targeted therapeutic interventions to enhance their quality of life and overall well-being.
Measured: baseline(T0), up to 7 weeks (T1) and 2 months after the end of the training (T2)
Secondary outcomes (18)
Melbourne Assessment-2 (MA2)
A standardized, valid, and reliable tool for assessing the quality of upper limb movement in children with neurological deficits aged between 2.5 and 15 years. The MA2 measures four elements of movement quality: range of motion, accuracy, dexterity, and fluidity. It consists of 14 items for reaching, grasping, releasing, and manipulating simple objects. For each item the examiner gives a score ranging from 0 to 4, higher score corresponds to better performance.A raw score and percentage score are provided for each of the four sections, which will be analyzed separately. The test is administered by video recording the child's performance, which will be evaluated later by the examiner.
Measured: baseline(T0), up to 7 weeks (T1) and 2 months after the end of the training (T2)
ABILHAND-Kids.
The ABILHAND-Kids is a brief questionnaire that measures 21 key bimanual daily activities. The score is assigned by a parent based on the difficulty the child has in performing the requested activity on a daily basis, using a 3-point scale (impossible, difficult, easy). The response scores are entered into a Rasch model to obtain a continuous score representing the child's level of manual ability. A higher score indicates greater manual skill and autonomy.
It has been validated in children with Cerebral Palsy aged 6 to 15 years, showing good validity (R=0.94) and good reproducibility over time (R=0.91).
Measured: baseline(T0), up to 7 weeks (T1) and 2 months after the end of the training (T2)
Gross Motor Function Measure-88 (GMFM-88).
The GMFM-88 is an assessment tool used to measure gross motor ability in children with motor disabilities, particularly those affected by cerebral palsy. It is designed to evaluate motor function in areas such as positioning, movement, trunk control, and locomotion. The GMFM-88 consists of a series of 88 items divided into five dimensions (A, B, C, D, E), with each item rated on a 4-point scale (0-3) that reflects the child's level of ability for that specific task. Single scores are summed to obtain a partial score for each dimension. The partial scores are then combined to calculate a total score, represented as a percentage that reflects the child's overall performance in gross motor skills. A higher score indicates better gross motor function.
Measured: baseline(T0), up to 7 weeks (T1) and 2 months after the end of the training (T2)
Six Minutes Walking Test (6MWT)
A test used to assess walking endurance in children with cerebral palsy. During the test, the child is encouraged to walk as much as possible for a period of six minutes along a standardized pathway. The score is assigned based on the total distance covered in six minutes and the distance covered separately in each minute, expressed in meters. This distance is then interpreted according to normative tables that vary by age, gender, and sometimes health status to determine if the result is adequate, below average, or above average. This test provides valuable information about the child's level of endurance during walking and can be used to monitor progress over time and evaluate the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions.
Measured: baseline(T0), up to 7 weeks (T1) and 2 months after the end of the training (T2)
NEPSY-II inibition and auditory attention subtest
INIBITION: It assesses the ability to inhibit automatic responses in favor of new ones and to switch from one type of response to another. It is divided into three conditions: naming, inhibition, and switching. For each condition, both accuracy and speed are obtained, with standardized scores ranging from 1 to 19. Higher scores indicate better performance.
AUDITORY ATTENTION: It assesses the ability to analyze and select target stimuli among distractors using auditory material. The score is indicated in percentiles.
Measured: baseline(T0), up to 7 weeks (T1) and 2 months after the end of the training (T2)
Leiter 3- Sustained attention subtest
It evaluates sustained visual attention and consists of repetitive barrage tasks to be completed within a predefined time. The number of correctly selected target items is recorded. Raw scores range from 0 to 217, while standardized scores range from 1 to 19. Higher scores indicate better performance.
Measured: baseline(T0), up to 7 weeks (T1) and 2 months after the end of the training (T2)
VMI
It is a pencil-and-paper test used to determine the level of integration between visual and motor systems. The child is asked to copy various geometric shapes presented on the paper within a certain timeframe. The number of correctly reproduced figures is recorded and then converted into standardized scores. Raw scores range from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating better performance.
Measured: baseline(T0), up to 7 weeks (T1) and 2 months after the end of the training (T2)
Tower of London (ToL)
It is a test useful for studying and measuring planning skills. The child must place three marbles (red, green, and blue) on a stand consisting of three pegs of different lengths in various configurations, following specific rules.
The total score is a combination of the number of problems solved correctly, the number of moves used, the errors made, and the time taken (if included). A higher score indicates greater planning and problem-solving abilities.
Measured: baseline(T0), up to 7 weeks (T1) and 2 months after the end of the training (T2)
BVL 4-12
The BVL 4-12 battery systematically evaluates phonological, lexical, semantic, pragmatic, and discourse skills through tasks of oral production, comprehension, and repetition in children aged 4 to 12 years, highlighting any communication and language disorders.
It's composed of 18 tasks each of which contains a different number of items; for each item a score from 0 to 1 is given. Scores are summed up to have a final score for each area, raw scores are transformed into z standardized scores according to normative data.
Higher score correspond to better performance.
Measured: baseline(T0), up to 7 weeks (T1) and 2 months after the end of the training (T2)
BVN 12-18 language, reading and writing subtest
The BVN 12-18 battery evaluates language reading, writing, and in adolescents aged 12 to 18 years.
This part is composed of 7 tasks each of which contains a different number of items; for each item a score from 0 to 1 is given. Except for reading items where reading speed and accuracy are evaluated in syllables/seconds and error rate.
Scores are summed up to have a final score for each area, raw scores are transformed into z standardized scores according to normative data.
Higher score correspond to better performance.
Measured: baseline(T0), up to 7 weeks (T1) and 2 months after the end of the training (T2)
MT-3 tests
Tests aimed at evaluating reading skills and text comprehension for primary and lower secondary school classes.
Reading speed and accuracy were evaluated by presenting children with a text and asking them to read it. Reading speed was measured in syllables per second (s/s). The error rate was calculated using the total number of words read.
For text comprehension we ask the child to read 2 texts and answer questions, for each of it a score from 0 to 1 is given and then summed; higher score corresponds to better performance.
Raw scores are transformed into z standardized scores according to normative data.
Measured: baseline(T0), up to 7 weeks (T1) and 2 months after the end of the training (T2)
BVSCO-3
BVSCO-3 tests measures the child's orthographic skills in terms of percentages of spelling errors made in dictation text task. Raw scores are transformed into z standardized scores according to normative data
Measured: baseline(T0), up to 7 weeks (T1) and 2 months after the end of the training (T2)
HTA Questionnaires
Questionnaires to be administered to various stakeholders (child, caregivers, and therapist) aimed at assessing the usability and acceptability of the proposed treatment. They will be constructed ad hoc based on specific aspects.
Measured: Up to 7 weeks after the baseline (T1)
3D Gait Analysis: Joint kinematics
Joint angles: measured throughout the gait cycle at the hip, knee, and ankle. Range of Motion (ROM): assessed for the lower limbs and trunk to evaluate the amplitude of joint movements.
Joint angles are measured in degrees.
Measured: baseline(T0), up to 7 weeks (T1) and 2 months after the end of the training (T2)
3D Gait Analysis: Kinetics - Ground Reaction Force
Ground Reaction Force (GRF): assessed in vertical, anteroposterior, and mediolateral directions to understand the forces exerted by the ground on the body.
Measured: baseline(T0), up to 7 weeks (T1) and 2 months after the end of the training (T2)
3D Gait Analysis: Kinetics - Joint moments
Joint moments: calculated at the hip, knee, and ankle to evaluate the forces acting on these joints throughout the gait cycle, expressed in Newton-meters, normalized by body weight in kilograms.
Measured: baseline(T0), up to 7 weeks (T1) and 2 months after the end of the training (T2)
3D Gait Analysis: Kinetics - Joint power
Joint power: power generated and absorbed at the joints during gait, expressed in watts, normalized by body weight in kilograms
Measured: baseline(T0), up to 7 weeks (T1) and 2 months after the end of the training (T2)
3D Gait Analysis: Spatiotemporal parameters
Step and stride length: the distance covered per step and per full gait cycle, measured in meters.
Duration of step and stride: time taken for each step and each complete stride, measured in seconds and as percentages of the gait cycle.
Cadence: number of steps per minute. Walking speed: velocity of walking, which is a key indicator of gait efficiency.
Stance and swing phase durations: the time spent in stance (foot in contact with the ground) and swing phases during the gait cycle.
Measured: baseline(T0), up to 7 weeks (T1) and 2 months after the end of the training (T2)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Oct 2024
- Study start4 Nov 2024
- Primary completion31 Jul 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Jan 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Neuromotor ImpairmentsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 194 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- IRCCS Fondazione Stella Maris
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- IRCCS Eugenio Medea, Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ETS, IRCCS National Neurological Institute "C. Mondino" Foundation, Istituto Giannina Gaslini
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06666829
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PNC0000007
- Other IDs
- PNC0000007 - Fit4MedRob
- Acronym
- MultiTECHChild
- Status last verified
- Oct 2024
- First submitted
- 23 Oct 2024
- Last updated
- 7 May 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Barzacchi V, Beani E, Filogna S, Sgherri G, Menici V, Marsanich G, Mazzoleni S, Cioni G, Sgandurra G. Feasibility study of the assessment of upper limb function in children with Unilateral Cerebral Palsy using an end-effector robotic device. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2026 Mar 19;23(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12984-026-01950-7.
PubMed 41857735
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 May 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Innovative Paths to Paediatric Care: A Multicenter Study on the Efficacy of Multi-Domain Technological and Robotic Rehabilitation.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06666829
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MultiTECHChild / PNC0000007
- Conditions
- Neuromotor Impairments
- Keywords
- Children, Multidomain, Robotic rehabilitation, Technological rehabilitation, Innovative
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 194 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- IRCCS Fondazione Stella MarisUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- IRCCS Eugenio Medea, Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ETS, IRCCS National Neurological Institute "C. Mondino" Foundation, Istituto Giannina Gaslini
- Study start
- 4 Nov 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Jul 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Jan 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 31 Oct 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this clinical trial is to demonstrate the efficacy of multi domain robotic and technological rehabilitation on everyday life and satisfaction in children with neuromotor conditions. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Will we have significant changes using the COPM in children taking part in the sperimental group?
- The children who will undergo the multidomain treatment will also experience functional improvements in individual areas?
- Thy type of treatment will improve motivation, active participation and satisfaction in children?
Researcher will compare the multidomain treatment to standard care proposed by the included clinical centers: single domain rehabilitation with one innovative device. Both groups will undergo also conventional multidomain therapy.
This will be done to see if using a holistic approach, and including every need of the child in the rehabilitation plan, can lead to greater improvements in quality of life compared to the control group.
Participant will:
- Be evaluated 3 times with clinical outcome measures
- Take part in a rehabilitation program, at least 20 x 2hours sessions treatment, organized in:
- 4 weeks, 5 times per week
- 7 weeks, 3 times per week
Detailed description
- The sample size was determined considering the primary outcome (the change in COPM): the superiority of robotic treatment compared to conventional treatment; a power of 80%; a number of groups equal to 2; a number of measurements equal to 3; and an effect size of 0.1. Based on these parameters, a sample size of 162 patients (81 per group) is obtained. Additionally, considering a dropout rate of 20%, a total sample size of 194 patients is required.
- For each recruited subject, a specific checklist (CRF) will be completed to collect the demographic, clinical, and technological data required by the study. All collected data will be pseudonymized (using a technique that modifies and masks personal and sensitive data to prevent it from being directly and easily attributed to an individual), in accordance with current privacy regulations. This will allow for regular monitoring of the study's progress, particularly regarding the number of subjects enrolled and recruited in the different phases, the evaluation tests conducted, adherence to the study, and the treatment protocols implemented.
- A high adherence to the study is anticipated, especially if the children involved receive treatment during the care period in rehabilitation facilities, in compliance with current regulations. To ensure the quality and consistency of the intervention, a careful assessment of adherence will be conducted. This assessment will be carried out by an independent team of clinical reviewers, who will regularly monitor treatment sessions. The reviewers will then implement targeted strategies to maintain and improve adherence, including periodic training sessions for the staff involved and timely feedback directed to the therapists in both study groups. A diary will also be maintained regarding the treatments performed by each patient to monitor adherence to the proposed treatment.
- Regarding the collection of data obtained from standardized clinical evaluations, each subject will be assigned a numeric ID code in accordance with current privacy regulations, allowing for the preservation and sharing of data in a completely anonymous form with other participating centers. The list linking the assigned code to each child's name will be kept by the principal investigator and stored in a locked cabinet. Only the principal investigator and other researchers involved in the project will have access to this information.
Similarly, information obtained during the rehabilitation phase from technological tools will be stored and shared with other participating centers in a completely anonymous manner, using the same numeric code previously defined. The data collected throughout the study, excluding the subject's name, will be recorded, processed, and stored for at least seven (7) years after the conclusion of the study, along with the assigned code, on password-protected hard drives stored in a physically secured location or within protected electronic archives (Research Electronic Data Capture (RedCap)), accessible only to the principal investigator and authorized researchers. After seven years, the data will be destroyed.
All collected information will not be processed or used for purposes other than those indicated in the study's objectives, nor for direct profit, and will not be communicated or transferred to unauthorized third parties.
Personal data will be collected and processed in accordance with the principle of data minimization and in compliance with all general principles outlined in Article 5 of the GDPR. Data, particularly personal and health-related data, will be processed only to the extent necessary in relation to the objectives of the trial, in accordance with EU Regulation 2016/679 (GDPR) and Legislative Decree No. 101 of August 10, 2018.
At the time of data collection, whether obtained from standardized clinical evaluations or from device reports, the Data Controllers will ensure that the collected data is pseudonymized by identifying the recruited subjects with codes or adopting other solutions compliant with point 5.4 of the Privacy Authority Provision No. 146/2019. The use of encryption techniques allows for the storage and processing of the data subject's information in a way that prevents identification by any external person. Only the Project Manager at each center and authorized personnel can link each code to the name of the participating subject.
•Regarding any events to be reported, the mode and timing of reporting will adhere to the obligations imposed by EU Regulation 2017/745 (Article 80) and the MDCG Guideline 2020-10/1 ("Safety reporting in clinical investigations of medical devices under Regulation (EU) 2017/745").
A specific insurance policy will be established, which will be activated immediately before the start of the clinical trial. Insurance quotes have been requested and are currently under evaluation. The policy will comply with the provisions of the Ministerial Decree of July 14, 2009, which guarantees specific coverage for damages caused to subjects by the trial activities throughout its duration, covering the civil liability of the investigator and the sponsor, without excluding damages unintentionally caused as a result of an accidental event and/or attributable to negligence, imprudence, or incompetence.
•The collected data will be presented using descriptive statistics, such as mean and standard deviation for numerical variables, and percentages for categorical variables.
The population will be defined to include patients in the multidomain treatment group or the control group (monodomain). The analyzable population will be defined by excluding patients who are not eligible for entry and those who do not receive the full treatment (due to treatment interruption for any reason). The primary endpoint at the end of treatment will be compared between the two treatment groups.
For the primary outcome, a planned subgroup analysis will be conducted to assess the presence of treatment effect modifiers. Continuous secondary outcomes will be analyzed in the population. All tests will be two-tailed with a significance level of 5%, and effect estimates will include a 95% confidence interval (CI).
Categorical outcomes will be reported as proportions with 95% CIs and compared using appropriate statistical tests. Similar analysis will be conducted to demonstrate any improvement in parameters measured during the follow-up (T2). This analysis will include subjects who completed the treatment, representing the population to be studied in the months following the completion of the treatment.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Multidomain treatment group | Experimental | Other: Multidomain interventionParticipant will undergo a Multidomain rehabilitation treatment using the combination of two or more innovative technological and robotic devices.This will also be associated with the conventional rehabilitation |
| Single domain treatment group | Active comparator | Device: Single domain interventionParticipant will undergo a Single domain rehabilitation treatment using only one innovative technological or robotic device.This will also be associated with the conventional rehabilitation |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 5 to 21 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Confirmed diagnosis of developmental disorder and/or disability, either congenital or acquired;
- Age between 5 and 21 years at the time of recruitment;
- Verbal and/or non-verbal reasoning abilities > 70 or > 5th percentile, as assessed by standardized tests such as Colored Progressive Matrices (CPM), WISC-IV or WISC-V, WPPSI-III or WPPSI-IV, Leiter-3, Griffiths III.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Presence of severe comorbidities and/or behavioral/cognitive disorders that prevent adequate patient compliance with both conventional and robotic rehabilitation treatment (severe intellectual disability);
- Uncontrolled epilepsy;
- Presence of severe sensory deficits;
- Patients who have undergone orthopedic functional surgery or rhizotomy and/or botulinum toxin treatment in the last 6 months;
- Involvement of the peripheral nervous system
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Multidomain interventiontreatment plan using combination of more than one technological or robotic devices, choosing from: Virtual Reality Rehabilitation System (VRSS), Khymeia TR; HomeKIT Khymeia; VRSS Khymeia EVO; Myro® Tyromotion; Diego Tyromotion; Tyrostation Tyromotion; Pablo® Tyromotion; Amadeo Tyromotion; Lexo® Tyromotion; Humaware MObile RoboT for upper Limb NeurOortho Rehabilitation (MOTORE); Humanware Upper Limb TRAcker(ULTRA+); Gloreha Sinfonia plus; C-Mill Motek; Gait Real Time Analysis Laboratory (GRAIL) Motek Medical; Nirvana BTS; Agilik; Armeo Spring pediatrico Hocoma; Lokomat ® Hocoma; Hand Tutor, Leg Tutor, Arm Tutor (MediTouch); Care Lab; Dessintey IVS3; Rehacom Hasomed; Hunova; GEO System (Kineo). In this way, the child will be taken care of holistically, considering their needs from a motor, cognitive, and speech therapy perspective. The treatment plan will also include a conventional multi-level rehabilitation program. | Other | Multidomain treatment group |
| Single domain interventionTreatment plan using only one of these technological or robotic device: Virtual Reality Rehabilitation System (VRSS), Khymeia TR; HomeKIT Khymeia; VRSS Khymeia EVO; Myro® Tyromotion; Diego Tyromotion; Tyrostation Tyromotion; Pablo® Tyromotion; Amadeo Tyromotion; Lexo® Tyromotion; Humaware MObile RoboT for upper Limb NeurOortho Rehabilitation (MOTORE); Humanware Upper Limb TRAcker(ULTRA+); Gloreha Sinfonia plus; C-Mill Motek; Gait Real Time Analysis Laboratory (GRAIL) Motek Medical; Nirvana BTS; Agilik; Armeo Spring pediatrico Hocoma; Lokomat ® Hocoma; Hand Tutor, Leg Tutor, Arm Tutor (MediTouch); Care Lab; Dessintey IVS3; Rehacom Hasomed; Hunova; GEO System (Kineo). Technological rehabilitation will focus on the main specific need for the child, it'll be chosen individually. The treatment plan will also include a conventional multi-level rehabilitation program. | Device | Single domain treatment group |
Primary outcome
Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM)
Time frame: baseline(T0), up to 7 weeks (T1) and 2 months after the end of the training (T2)
Assessment tool used in occupational therapy to evaluate an individual's performance and satisfaction in both daily and personal activities. The COPM focuses on activities that are meaningful to the assessed person, allowing them to identify areas where they wish to improve their abilities or participation. This tool helps therapists better understand their patients' needs and desires, enabling them to plan targeted therapeutic interventions to enhance their quality of life and overall well-being.
18 secondary outcomes
Melbourne Assessment-2 (MA2)
Time frame: baseline(T0), up to 7 weeks (T1) and 2 months after the end of the training (T2)
ABILHAND-Kids.
Time frame: baseline(T0), up to 7 weeks (T1) and 2 months after the end of the training (T2)
Gross Motor Function Measure-88 (GMFM-88).
Time frame: baseline(T0), up to 7 weeks (T1) and 2 months after the end of the training (T2)
Six Minutes Walking Test (6MWT)
Time frame: baseline(T0), up to 7 weeks (T1) and 2 months after the end of the training (T2)
NEPSY-II inibition and auditory attention subtest
Time frame: baseline(T0), up to 7 weeks (T1) and 2 months after the end of the training (T2)
Leiter 3- Sustained attention subtest
Time frame: baseline(T0), up to 7 weeks (T1) and 2 months after the end of the training (T2)
VMI
Time frame: baseline(T0), up to 7 weeks (T1) and 2 months after the end of the training (T2)
Tower of London (ToL)
Time frame: baseline(T0), up to 7 weeks (T1) and 2 months after the end of the training (T2)
BVL 4-12
Time frame: baseline(T0), up to 7 weeks (T1) and 2 months after the end of the training (T2)
BVN 12-18 language, reading and writing subtest
Time frame: baseline(T0), up to 7 weeks (T1) and 2 months after the end of the training (T2)
MT-3 tests
Time frame: baseline(T0), up to 7 weeks (T1) and 2 months after the end of the training (T2)
BVSCO-3
Time frame: baseline(T0), up to 7 weeks (T1) and 2 months after the end of the training (T2)
HTA Questionnaires
Time frame: Up to 7 weeks after the baseline (T1)
3D Gait Analysis: Joint kinematics
Time frame: baseline(T0), up to 7 weeks (T1) and 2 months after the end of the training (T2)
3D Gait Analysis: Kinetics - Ground Reaction Force
Time frame: baseline(T0), up to 7 weeks (T1) and 2 months after the end of the training (T2)
3D Gait Analysis: Kinetics - Joint moments
Time frame: baseline(T0), up to 7 weeks (T1) and 2 months after the end of the training (T2)
3D Gait Analysis: Kinetics - Joint power
Time frame: baseline(T0), up to 7 weeks (T1) and 2 months after the end of the training (T2)
3D Gait Analysis: Spatiotemporal parameters
Time frame: baseline(T0), up to 7 weeks (T1) and 2 months after the end of the training (T2)
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 May 2025.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41857735Barzacchi V, Beani E, Filogna S, Sgherri G, Menici V, Marsanich G, Mazzoleni S, Cioni G, Sgandurra G. Feasibility study of the assessment of upper limb function in children with Unilateral Cerebral Palsy using an end-effector robotic device. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2026 Mar 19;23(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12984-026-01950-7.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Neuromotor Impairments
Not yet recruiting
PhiCube for Bilateral Upper Limb Neuromotor and Cognitive Rehabilitation in Adults
Stroke, Parkinson Disease
Not yet recruiting
AI-based Model for Rehabilitation Engagement and Motor Performance Evaluation in Pediatric Patients: A Pilot Study
Neuromotor Impairments
Recruiting
Physical Therapy for Montana Children With NMD Using Hippotherapy and the Equine Environment
Neuromotor Impairments
Recruiting
A Story for Pepper & Nao
Children and Adolescents With Neuromotor Impairment
Recruiting
Clinical Impacts of Structured Robotic Gait Training Programs
Neuromotor Impairments, Walking Impairment
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
6 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Multidomain intervention and Single domain intervention in people with Neuromotor Impairments, run by IRCCS Fondazione Stella Maris at 6 sites in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 May 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 6 sites in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Giuseppina Sgandurra Prof.ssa Sgndurra (050886284, giuseppina.sgandurra@fsm.unipi.it), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) (time frame: baseline(T0), up to 7 weeks (T1) and 2 months after the end of the training (T2)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06666829, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 May 2025.