Motor Function; RetardationNCT06679361
Effects of Motor and Sensory Exercises on Hand Functions
A study testing Motor Exercise Program, Sensory Exercise Group and Combined Motor and Sensory Exercise Group in people with Motor Function; Retardation, run by Atlas University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
This project will compare the effectiveness of sensory and motor exercises used in clinical settings for healthy young adults. This approach will allow the investigators to evaluate the impact of these exercises on hand functions. The study plans to include 80 healthy young adults aged 18-25. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 25 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Motor Function; Retardation
- What is being tested?
- Motor Exercise Program, Sensory Exercise Group and Combined Motor and Sensory Exercise Group
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 80 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 1 Nov 2024to 15 Jan 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 25 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Having the ability to verbally communicate to answer questions
- Willingness to participate in the study
- Having read and signed the informed consent form
Who cannot join
- Having joint movement restriction in the upper extremity
- Presence of skin injury or scarring on the hand or wrist
- History of surgery on the upper extremity
- Having an orthopedic problem in the upper extremity
- Having a rheumatic disease
- Having a neurological condition in the upper extremity
- Having a severe mental or cognitive impairment
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Comparison of the Effects of Motor and Sensory Exercises on Hand Functions in Healthy Young Adults
This project will compare the effectiveness of sensory and motor exercises used in clinical settings for healthy young adults. This approach will allow the investigators to evaluate the impact of these exercises on hand functions.
The study plans to include 80 healthy young adults aged 18-25. After providing participants with information about the study's purpose, written informed consent will be obtained to confirm voluntary participation. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: "sensory exercise," "motor exercise," and "sensory and motor exercise." The effects on muscle reaction time and hand skills for the dominant hands will be evaluated before and after the exercises.
Read the detailed description
Hand functions occupy a significant place in the functional activities of daily life. Therefore, impairments in wrist function can severely impact daily activities and quality of life. Hand rehabilitation includes various methods aimed at improving hand functions for treating numerous conditions affecting the wrist. However, it has been determined that treatments targeting both motor and sensory functions should be used together to enhance functionality. For this purpose, this project will compare the effectiveness of sensory and motor exercises used in clinical settings in healthy young adults, allowing investigators to evaluate their impact on hand functions.
The study will include 80 healthy young adults aged 18-25. After participants are informed about the study's purpose, written informed consent will be obtained to confirm voluntary participation. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: "sensory exercise," "motor exercise," and "sensory and motor exercise." The effects on muscle reaction time and hand skills for the dominant hand will be evaluated before and after the exercises. Data from the study will be analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 25.0. Demographic characteristics of participants will be expressed as arithmetic mean ± standard deviation and percentages. The normal distribution of data will be examined using visual (histogram and probability plots) and analytical methods (Kolmogorov-Smirnov/Shapiro-Wilk tests). Pre- and post-evaluations within groups will be assessed using the student-t test, and intergroup comparisons will be evaluated with the student-t test if data follows a normal distribution, or with the Mann-Whitney U test if not. A p-value of <0.05 will be considered statistically significant.
- Conditions
- Motor Function; Retardation
- Being tested
- Motor Exercise Program, Sensory Exercise Group, Combined Motor and Sensory Exercise Group
- Keywords
- hand function, sensory, motor, exercise training, muscle reaction
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Motor Exercise ProgramBehavioural
This program consists of wrist motor exercises focused on active range of motion (including flexion, extension, ulnar and radial deviation, and finger flexion) along with nerve mobilization exercises for the medial, radial, and ulnar nerves. The aim is to enhance motor function in the wrist and hand.
Sensory Exercise GroupBehavioural
Arm Description: This group will engage in sensory exercises designed to enhance sensory awareness in the hand and wrist. Exercises will include interaction with varied textures (such as sand and sensory balls), different fabrics (fur, satin, linen), and multisensory foam gels. The goal is to improve sensory function and tactile discrimination.
Combined Motor and Sensory Exercise GroupBehavioural
Participants in this group will perform both motor and sensory exercises as described for the first two groups. By combining motor and sensory interventions, this group aims to improve both motor skills and sensory awareness in the wrist and hand, potentially enhancing overall hand function more effectively.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Motor Exercise Group | Experimental | Participants in this group will receive motor exercises targeting the wrist, including active range of motion exercises (flexion, extension, ulnar, radial deviation, and finger flexion) and nerve mobilization exercises (medial, radial, and ulnar nerves). These exercises aim to improve motor function in the wrist and hand. Receives: Behavioral: Motor Exercise Program |
| Sensory Exercise Group | Experimental | This group will engage in sensory exercises designed to enhance sensory awareness in the hand and wrist. Exercises will include interaction with varied textures (such as sand and sensory balls), different fabrics (fur, satin, linen), and multisensory foam gels. The goal is to improve sensory function and tactile discrimination. Receives: Behavioral: Motor Exercise Program; Behavioral: Sensory Exercise Group |
| Combined Motor and Sensory Exercise Group | Experimental | Arm Description: Participants in this group will perform both motor and sensory exercises as described for the first two groups. By combining motor and sensory interventions, this group aims to improve both motor skills and sensory awareness in the wrist and hand, potentially enhancing overall hand function more effectively. Receives: Behavioral: Combined Motor and Sensory Exercise Group |
| control | No intervention | The control group did not receive any additional treatments during the study period, allowing for a clear comparison between the experimental group and the baseline conditions. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Hand Dexterity (Moberg Pick-Up Test) Hand Dexterity (Moberg Pick-Up Test) Hand Dexterity (Moberg Pick-Up Test)
This measure will evaluate hand dexterity and functional hand skills using the Moberg Pick-Up Test. Participants will be asked to place various objects into a container using both their dominant and non-dominant hands, with and without visual cues. The time taken for each attempt will be recorded, and the best score from three trials will be used to assess dexterity. Measurements are recorded in seconds, where lower scores indicate better hand dexterity.
Scale Range: No minimum or maximum value in seconds (lower time indicates better dexterity).
Interpretation: Lower times signify better outcomes, as they reflect quicker and more coordinated hand movements in completing the task.
Measured: immediately after the intervention
Secondary outcomes (2)
Muscle Reaction Time
Light Trainer® system, which consists of a wireless lighting system with LED pods and a central controller. The participants were seated with their hands on the table, 40 cm apart, palms down, and elbows at 90°. The Light Trainer was positioned centrally 20 cm away from each hand. When the pod was illuminated, the participants were instructed to turn off the light as quickly as possible by touching it. Light activation was randomized to avoid predictability, requiring participants to respond based on light cues each time. In the first task, the participants used their dominant hand to turn off the light as quickly as possible. In the second task, they responded to a light signal by deactivating a predetermined light from two different colors using their dominant hand.
Scale Range: No minimum or maximum value in milliseconds (lower time is better).
Interpretation: Lower reaction times signify better outcomes, as they reflect faster muscle response to visual stimuli.
Measured: immediately after the intervention
Grip Strength (Measured Using Jamar Electronic Dynamometer)
Hand performance was assessed based on grip strength using a Takei Handheld Dynamometer (Takei Scientific Instruments Co., Tokyo, Japan). Participants were seated with elbows flexed at 90 degrees and forearms in a neutral position, and were instructed to squeeze the dynamometer with maximum force for 3-5 seconds, with the palm facing upwards. Each hand was tested three times with a 20-second rest between trials, and the highest value was recorded. This protocol ensures standardized and consistent results, with measurements documented in kilograms (kg) to provide reliable grip strength assessment.
Scale Range: The dynamometer measures from 0 to 90 kg. Interpretation: Higher scores reflect stronger grip strength, which is indicative of better hand function.
Measured: immediately after the intervention
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Nov 2024
- Study start1 Nov 2024
- Primary completion30 Dec 2024
- Study completion15 Jan 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Motor Function; RetardationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Participants in this study will be randomized into three parallel groups to assess the effects of motor, sensory, and combined motor-sensory exercises on hand function. Each group will receive a specific intervention type (motor, sensory, or combined exercises), and outcomes such as muscle reaction time and hand dexterity will be measured pre- and post-intervention for both dominant and non-dominant hands.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Atlas University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Gamze Demircioğlu, Atlas University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06679361
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2024-ATLAS-MSEHF-001
- Status last verified
- Jul 2025
- First submitted
- 1 Nov 2024
- Last updated
- 28 Jul 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: There is no plan to share individual participant data (IPD) from this study. All collected data will be used solely for the purpose of analyzing study outcomes and will remain confidential. This approach is taken to ensure the privacy and confidentiality of participant information.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Jul 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of the Effects of Motor and Sensory Exercises on Hand Functions in Healthy Young Adults
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06679361
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2024-ATLAS-MSEHF-001
- Conditions
- Motor Function; Retardation
- Keywords
- hand function, sensory, motor, exercise training, muscle reaction
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Atlas UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Nov 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Dec 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Jan 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Nov 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This project will compare the effectiveness of sensory and motor exercises used in clinical settings for healthy young adults. This approach will allow the investigators to evaluate the impact of these exercises on hand functions.
The study plans to include 80 healthy young adults aged 18-25. After providing participants with information about the study's purpose, written informed consent will be obtained to confirm voluntary participation. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: "sensory exercise," "motor exercise," and "sensory and motor exercise." The effects on muscle reaction time and hand skills for the dominant hands will be evaluated before and after the exercises.
Detailed description
Hand functions occupy a significant place in the functional activities of daily life. Therefore, impairments in wrist function can severely impact daily activities and quality of life. Hand rehabilitation includes various methods aimed at improving hand functions for treating numerous conditions affecting the wrist. However, it has been determined that treatments targeting both motor and sensory functions should be used together to enhance functionality. For this purpose, this project will compare the effectiveness of sensory and motor exercises used in clinical settings in healthy young adults, allowing investigators to evaluate their impact on hand functions.
The study will include 80 healthy young adults aged 18-25. After participants are informed about the study's purpose, written informed consent will be obtained to confirm voluntary participation. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: "sensory exercise," "motor exercise," and "sensory and motor exercise." The effects on muscle reaction time and hand skills for the dominant hand will be evaluated before and after the exercises. Data from the study will be analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 25.0. Demographic characteristics of participants will be expressed as arithmetic mean ± standard deviation and percentages. The normal distribution of data will be examined using visual (histogram and probability plots) and analytical methods (Kolmogorov-Smirnov/Shapiro-Wilk tests). Pre- and post-evaluations within groups will be assessed using the student-t test, and intergroup comparisons will be evaluated with the student-t test if data follows a normal distribution, or with the Mann-Whitney U test if not. A p-value of <0.05 will be considered statistically significant.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 4
- Model description
- Participants in this study will be randomized into three parallel groups to assess the effects of motor, sensory, and combined motor-sensory exercises on hand function. Each group will receive a specific intervention type (motor, sensory, or combined exercises), and outcomes such as muscle reaction time and hand dexterity will be measured pre- and post-intervention for both dominant and non-dominant hands.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Motor Exercise Group | Experimental | Behavioral: Motor Exercise ProgramParticipants in this group will receive motor exercises targeting the wrist, including active range of motion exercises (flexion, extension, ulnar, radial deviation, and finger flexion) and nerve mobilization exercises (medial, radial, and ulnar nerves). These exercises aim to improve motor function in the wrist and hand. |
| Sensory Exercise Group | Experimental | Behavioral: Motor Exercise Program, Behavioral: Sensory Exercise GroupThis group will engage in sensory exercises designed to enhance sensory awareness in the hand and wrist. Exercises will include interaction with varied textures (such as sand and sensory balls), different fabrics (fur, satin, linen), and multisensory foam gels. The goal is to improve sensory function and tactile discrimination. |
| Combined Motor and Sensory Exercise Group | Experimental | Behavioral: Combined Motor and Sensory Exercise GroupArm Description: Participants in this group will perform both motor and sensory exercises as described for the first two groups. By combining motor and sensory interventions, this group aims to improve both motor skills and sensory awareness in the wrist and hand, potentially enhancing overall hand function more effectively. |
| control | No intervention | –The control group did not receive any additional treatments during the study period, allowing for a clear comparison between the experimental group and the baseline conditions. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 25 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Having the ability to verbally communicate to answer questions
- Willingness to participate in the study
- Having read and signed the informed consent form
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Having joint movement restriction in the upper extremity
- Presence of skin injury or scarring on the hand or wrist
- History of surgery on the upper extremity
- Having an orthopedic problem in the upper extremity
- Having a rheumatic disease
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Motor Exercise ProgramThis program consists of wrist motor exercises focused on active range of motion (including flexion, extension, ulnar and radial deviation, and finger flexion) along with nerve mobilization exercises for the medial, radial, and ulnar nerves. The aim is to enhance motor function in the wrist and hand. | Behavioural | Motor Exercise Group, Sensory Exercise Group |
| Sensory Exercise GroupArm Description: This group will engage in sensory exercises designed to enhance sensory awareness in the hand and wrist. Exercises will include interaction with varied textures (such as sand and sensory balls), different fabrics (fur, satin, linen), and multisensory foam gels. The goal is to improve sensory function and tactile discrimination. | Behavioural | Sensory Exercise Group |
| Combined Motor and Sensory Exercise GroupParticipants in this group will perform both motor and sensory exercises as described for the first two groups. By combining motor and sensory interventions, this group aims to improve both motor skills and sensory awareness in the wrist and hand, potentially enhancing overall hand function more effectively. | Behavioural | Combined Motor and Sensory Exercise Group |
Primary outcome
Hand Dexterity (Moberg Pick-Up Test) Hand Dexterity (Moberg Pick-Up Test) Hand Dexterity (Moberg Pick-Up Test)
Time frame: immediately after the intervention
This measure will evaluate hand dexterity and functional hand skills using the Moberg Pick-Up Test. Participants will be asked to place various objects into a container using both their dominant and non-dominant hands, with and without visual cues. The time taken for each attempt will be recorded, and the best score from three trials will be used to assess dexterity. Measurements are recorded in seconds, where lower scores indicate better hand dexterity. Scale Range: No minimum or maximum value in seconds (lower time indicates better dexterity). Interpretation: Lower times signify better outcomes, as they reflect quicker and more coordinated hand movements in completing the task.
2 secondary outcomes
Muscle Reaction Time
Time frame: immediately after the intervention
Grip Strength (Measured Using Jamar Electronic Dynamometer)
Time frame: immediately after the intervention
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Jul 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. There is no plan to share individual participant data (IPD) from this study. All collected data will be used solely for the purpose of analyzing study outcomes and will remain confidential. This approach is taken to ensure the privacy and confidentiality of participant information.
Related trials for Motor Function; Retardation
RecruitingObservational study
Rare Disease Patient Registry & Natural History Study - Coordination of Rare Diseases at Sanford
Rare Disorders, Undiagnosed Disorders
Recruiting
Dopamine Modulation of Motivation and Motor Function in Major Depression & Inflammation
Depressive Disorder, Major
Recruiting
Development of a Novel Strategy to Analyze the Effect on Gait Using Transcutaneous Spinal Current Stimulation in Incomplete Spinal Cord Injured Patients
Spinal Cord Injuries, Non Invasive Spinal Stimulation
Recruiting
Effects of Different Dual-Task Exercises in Children With Mild Mental Retardation
Mental Retardation
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Motor Exercise Program, Sensory Exercise Group and Combined Motor and Sensory Exercise Group in people with Motor Function; Retardation, run by Atlas University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Jul 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Hand Dexterity (Moberg Pick-Up Test) Hand Dexterity (Moberg Pick-Up Test) Hand Dexterity (Moberg Pick-Up Test) (time frame: immediately after the intervention). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Jul 2025.