AzTrials
AzTrials

Acute Myelogenous LeukemiaPhase 2NCT06680661

ABBA CORD: dCBT w/ Abatacept for aGVHD Prophylaxis

A Phase 2 study testing Cyclophosphamide, Fludarabine and Thiotepa in people with Acute Myelogenous Leukemia and Acute Lymphatic Leukemia, run by Leland Metheny at 1 site in United States.

Suspended

Paused. Enrolment is on hold for now and may resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to see if adding abatacept to tacrolimus and MMF prevents or reduces the chances of acute graft versus host disease which is a complication that can occur after transplant in participants with blood cancer. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
What is being tested?
Cyclophosphamide, Fludarabine and Thiotepa
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
20 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
8 Apr 2026to 31 Oct 2028
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with the following hematologic malignancies:
  • Acute myelogenous leukemia (AML): High-risk and intermediate-risk AML including:
  • Antecedent hematological disease (e.g., myelodysplasia (MDS))
  • Treatment-related leukemia
  • Complete Remission (CR1) with poor or intermediate-risk cytogenetics or molecular markers (e.g. Flt 3 mutation, 11q23, del 5, del 7, complex cytogenetics)
  • CR2 or CR3
Show all 37Show fewer
  • Induction failure or 1st relapse with < 10% blasts in the marrow
  • Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL):
  • High-risk CR1 including:
  • Poor-risk cytogenetics (e.g., Philadelphia chromosome t(9;22)or 11q23 rearrangements)
  • Philadelphia chromosome-like ALL
  • Presence of minimal disease by flow cytometry after 2 or more cycles of chemotherapy
  • No CR within 4 weeks of initial treatment
  • Induction failure with < 10% blasts in the marrow
  • CR2 or CR3
  • Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), Intermediate, High or Very High Risk by the revised international prognostic scoring system or treatment related MDS.
  • Bi-phenotypic or mixed-phenotypic acute leukemia in:
  • CR.
  • Induction failure or 1st relapse with < 10% blasts in the marrow.
  • Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia (CML) in second chronic phase after accelerated or blast crisis.
  • Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML)
  • Hodgkin's Lymphoma that is relapsed or refractory
  • Age > or equal to 18 years, < or equal to 70yrs
  • KPS > or equal to 80 for Flu/Cy/Thio/TBI; KPS > 60 for Flu/Treo/TBI
  • Patients without a suitable HLA-matched related or unrelated donor
  • Patient with the following CB units:
  • At least two 4-8/8 HLA high resolution matched CB units. Both must have a cell dose of 1.5x107 TNC/kg each and 1.5x105 CD34+/kg
  • A minimum of 1 CB unit as back up.
  • Concurrent Therapy for Extramedullary Leukemia or CNS Lymphoma: Concurrent therapy or prophylaxis for testicular leukemia, CNS leukemia, and CNS lymphoma including standard intrathecal chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy will be allowed as clinically indicated. Such treatment may continue until the planned course is completed. Subjects must be in CNS remission at the time of protocol enrollment if there is a history of CNS involvement. Maintenance therapy after transplant is allowed.
  • Subjects must have the ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document.
  • For women of childbearing potential: agreement to remain abstinent (refrain from heterosexual intercourse) or use a contraceptive method with a failure rate of < 1% per year during the treatment period and for 12 months after the last dose of abatacept.
  • A woman is considered to be of childbearing potential if she is < 60 years old, postmenarcheal, has not reached a postmenopausal state (< 12 continuous months of amenorrhea with no identified cause other than menopause), and has not undergone surgical sterilization (removal of ovaries and/or uterus).
  • Examples of contraceptive methods with a failure rate of < 1% per year include bilateral tubal ligation, male sterilization, hormonal contraceptives that inhibit ovulation, hormone-releasing intrauterine devices, and copper intrauterine devices.
  • The reliability of sexual abstinence should be evaluated in relation to the duration of the clinical trial and the preferred and usual lifestyle of the patient. Periodic abstinence (e.g., calendar, ovulation, symptothermal, or postovulation methods) and withdrawal are not acceptable methods of contraception.
  • For men: agreement to remain abstinent (refrain from heterosexual intercourse) or use contraceptive measures with female partners of reproductive potential, and agreement to refrain from donating sperm, as defined below:
  • With female partners of childbearing potential, men must remain abstinent or use a condom plus an additional contraceptive method that together result in a failure rate of < 1% per year during the treatment period and for 12 months after the last dose of abatacept. Men must refrain from donating sperm during this same period. With pregnant female partners, men must remain abstinent or use a condom during the treatment period and for at least 12 months after the last dose of abatacept.
  • The reliability of sexual abstinence should be evaluated in relation to the duration of the clinical trial and the preferred and usual lifestyle of the patient. Periodic abstinence (e.g., calendar, ovulation, symptothermal, or postovulation methods) and withdrawal are not acceptable methods of contraception.

Who cannot join

  • Patients with inadequate Organ Function as defined by:
  • Creatinine clearance < 50ml/min
  • Bilirubin > 2X institutional upper limit of normal unless Gilbert syndrome
  • AST (SGOT) > 3X institutional upper limit of normal
  • ALT (SGPT) > 3X institutional upper limit of normal
  • Pulmonary function: DLCOc < 60% normal
Show all 14Show fewer
  • Cardiac: left ventricular ejection fraction < 50
  • Patients with uncontrolled inter-current illness including, but not limited to ongoing or active infection, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmia, or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements.
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women are excluded from this study because chemotherapy involved with RIC have the significant potential for teratogenic or abortifacient effects.
  • Any condition that would, in the investigator's judgment, interfere with full participation in the study, including administration of study drug and attending required study visits; pose a significant risk to the subject; or interfere with interpretation of study data.
  • Known allergies, hypersensitivity, or intolerance to any of the study medications, excipients, or similar compounds.
  • Presence of donor-specific antibodies against chosen graft source.
  • Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Comorbidity index (HCT-CI) > 5.
  • Prior autologous or allogenic stem cell transplant within the preceding 12 months.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44106

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: ABBA CORD: Double Umbilical Cord Blood Transplants With Abatacept for Graft Versus Host Disease Prophylaxis

The goal of this clinical trial is to see if adding abatacept to tacrolimus and MMF prevents or reduces the chances of acute graft versus host disease which is a complication that can occur after transplant in participants with blood cancer. The usual therapy for graft versus host disease prevention after a cord blood transplant includes tacrolimus and MMF. The main question this clinical trial aims to answer is whether or not abatacept will be safe and effective in reducing aGVHD rates in dCBT.

Participants will:

  • Partake in exams, tests, and procedures as part of usual cancer care.
  • Partake in conditioning, which is the treatment that is given before a transplant.
  • Have a cord blood transplant.
  • Partake in radiation following the transplant.
Read the detailed description

Cord blood (CB) is a valuable alternative graft source for patients with hematologic malignancies in need of allogeneic transplantation who lack human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched adult donors. In Black, Asian, Hispanic populations, the chance of finding a HLA matched donor is 23%, 41%, and 46%, respectively. CB allows for greater HLA difference between donor and recipient, and increases the availability of donors, and therefore transplant, to these populations. Retrospective analyses and prospective trials demonstrate that recipients of double CB transplant (dCBT) have a grade II-IV acute graft versus host disease (aGVHD) rate of 45-90% and grade III-IV aGVHD rates up to 24%. This high aGVHD rate is likely due to the HLA-disparities between donor and recipient, which also drives a robust graft versus leukemia response8. Anti-thymocyte globin has been used in dCBT to reduce the incidence of aGVHD, but is no longer recommended due to delayed immune-reconstitution of the CB grafts. The ABA2 trial demonstrated efficacy and safety of abatacept as prophylaxis for aGVHD in HLA-mismatched unrelated donors (MMUD), significantly reducing the rate both of grade III-IV aGVHD and grade II-IV aGVHD in 7/8 MMUD when compared to historical controls. Our hypothesis is that abatacept will be safe and effective in reducing aGVHD rates in dCBT.

Being tested
Cyclophosphamide, Fludarabine, Thiotepa, Total Body Irradiation, Double Umbilical Cord Transplant
Keywords
Chronic Myelomonocytic Lymphoma, Umbilical Cord Blood Transplant, Double Umbilical Cord Transplant, Cord blood
Medical subject headings
Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute, Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma, Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive, Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Leukemia, Myelomonocytic, Chronic, Lymphoma, Hodgkin Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • CyclophosphamideDrug

    Cyclophosphamide (Cy) is one part of the conditioning regimen. 50 mg/kg beginning on day -6.

  • FludarabineDrug

    Fludarabine (Flu) is one part of the conditioning regimen. 150 mg/m2 (30 mg/m2 per day on days -6 to -2)

  • ThiotepaDrug

    Thiotepa (Thio) is one part of the conditioning regimen.10 mg/kg (5 mg/kg per day on days -5 and -4)

  • Total Body IrradiationRadiation

    400 cGy (200 cGy per day on days -2 and -1).

  • Double Umbilical Cord TransplantBiological

    Cord blood is a regulated biologic. Selection of cord blood units will be based on published guidelines.

  • TacrolimusDrug

    Tacrolimus will be administered post transplant. Graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis will consist of tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), starting on day-5. Tacrolimus will continue at least until day 180 and then be tapered off.

  • Mycophenolate MofetilDrug

    MMF will be administered post transplant. Graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis will consist of tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), starting on day-5. MMF will continue until day 30.

  • AbataceptDrug

    Abatacept at a dose of 10mg/kg will be given on days T-1, T+5, T+14 and T+28.

Study groups in NCT06680661
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Cy/Flu/Thio/TBI + dCBT + Tac/MMF + AbataceptExperimentalCyclophosphamide (Cy), fludarabine (Flu), thiotepa (Thio), and total body irradiation (TBI) is the preparative regimen for Double Umbilical Cord Transplant (dCBT). Graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis will consist of tacrolimus (Tac) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Abatacept will be administered.
Receives: Drug: Cyclophosphamide; Drug: Fludarabine; Drug: Thiotepa; Radiation: Total Body Irradiation; Biological: Double Umbilical Cord Transplant; Drug: Tacrolimus; Drug: Mycophenolate Mofetil; Drug: Abatacept

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Severe aGVHD free survival

    To assess severe aGVHD (grade III-IV acute GVHD) free survival (SGFS) at T+180.

    Measured: 180 days after treatment

Secondary outcomes (23)
  1. Non-relapse mortality

    Treatment Related Mortality (TRM) at 1 year is the percentage of patients who expire from treatment related toxicity attributed to transplant up to 1 year after transplant.

    Measured: 1 year post transplant

  2. Overall Survival

    Overall Survival (OS) at 1 year is the percentage of patients alive at 1 year after transplant.

    Measured: 1 year post transplant

  3. Rate of relapse

    Relapse incidence at 1 year is the percentage of patients who experience relapse of their hematologic malignancy up to 1 year after transplant.

    Measured: 1 year post transplant

  4. Disease free survival

    Disease Free Survival at 1 year is the percentage of patients alive and without evidence of hematologic malignancy at 1 year after transplant.

    Measured: 1 year post transplant

  5. Incidence of chronic GVHD

    Chronic graft versus host disease (cGVHD) 1-year cumulative incidence is the percentage of patients who experienced any cGVHD up to 1 year after transplant.

    Measured: 1 year post transplant

  6. Incidence of chronic GVHD

    Chronic graft versus host disease (cGVHD) 2-year cumulative incidence is the percentage of patients who experienced any cGVHD up to 2 years after transplant.

    Measured: 2 years post transplant

  7. Incidence of chronic GVHD

    Chronic graft versus host disease (cGVHD) 3-year cumulative incidence is the percentage of patients who experienced any cGVHD up to 3 years after transplant.

    Measured: 3 years post transplant

  8. Rate of Grade III-IV aGVHD

    Grade III-IV aGVHD prevalence at T+100 is the percentage of patients who have grade III-IV aGVHD at T+100.

    Measured: 100 days after treatment

  9. Rate of Grade II-IV aGVHD

    Grade II-IV aGVHD prevenance at T+100 is the percentage of patients who have grade II-IV aGVHD at T+100.

    Measured: 100 days after treatment

  10. Rate of Grade III-IV aGVHD

    Grade III-IV aGVHD prevalence at T+180 is the percentage of patients who have grade III-IV aGVHD at T+180.

    Measured: 180 days after treatment

  11. Rate of Grade II-IV aGVHD

    Grade II-IV aGVHD prevalence at T+180 is the percentage of patients who have grade II-IV aGVHD at T+180.

    Measured: 180 days after treatment

  12. CMV reactivation rate

    The cumulative incidence of CMV reactivation at 1 year is defined as the detection of CMV within any organ by biopsy or within the plasma within the first year of transplant.

    Measured: 1 year after transplant

  13. EBV reactivation rate

    The cumulative incidence of EBV reactivation at 1 year is defined as the detection of EBV in the plasma or blood less than 1000 copies/ml within the first year of transplant.

    Measured: 1 year after treatment

  14. Time to neutrophil engraftment

    Neutrophil engraftment will be calculated as the days from transplant where the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) reaches >500cells/ul x 3 days.

    Measured: Within first 30 days of transplant

  15. Time to platelet engraftment

    Platelet engraftment will be calculated as the days from transplant where the platelet count reaches 20,000 platelets /ul without the need of transfusion of platelets for 7 days.

    Measured: Within first 60 days of transplant

  16. Donor chimerism

    Donor chimerism rates will drawn at day 100 post transplant.

    Measured: Day 100 post transplant

  17. Donor chimerism

    Donor chimerism rates will drawn 1 year post transplant.

    Measured: 1 year post transplant

  18. Time to taper off tacrolimus

    The average time to taper off of tacrolimus will be calculated.

    Measured: Within 1 year of transplant

  19. Time to taper off MMF

    The average time to taper off of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) will be calculated.

    Measured: Within 90 days of transplant

  20. Assessment of aGVHD biomarker ST2

    An assessment of aGVHD biomarker ST2 will occur 7 days post transplant.

    Measured: 7 days post transplant

  21. Assessment of aGVHD biomarker ST2

    An assessment of aGVHD biomarker ST2 will occur 28 days post-transplant.

    Measured: 28 days post transplant

  22. Assessment of aGVHD biomarker REG3α

    An assessment of aGVHD biomarker REG3α will occur 7 days post-transplant.

    Measured: 7 days post transplant

  23. Assessment of aGVHD biomarker REG3α

    An assessment of aGVHD biomarker REG3α will occur 28 days post-transplant.

    Measured: 28 days post transplant

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Nov 2024
  2. Study start8 Apr 2026
  3. Primary completion29 Oct 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Oct 2028 (estimated)

Why it stopped: insufficient funding

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
Approximately 20 subjects will be enrolled in this trial: 7 patients will be accrued for the Stage 1. Stage 1 must be complete and the 7th patient reach T+180 prior to enrolling 13 additional patients to Stage 2.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
20 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06680661
Sponsor's protocol ID
CASE1924
Status last verified
Sep 2026
First submitted
31 Oct 2024
Last updated
10 Sep 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: All IPD that underlie results in publication.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Cyclophosphamide, Fludarabine and Thiotepa in people with Acute Myelogenous Leukemia and Acute Lymphatic Leukemia, run by Leland Metheny at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 37 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: paused, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Severe aGVHD free survival (time frame: 180 days after treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Sep 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in