Athletic Performance and Injury RiskNCT06681311
The Effects of Core and Shoulder Stabilization Exercises on Athletic Performance and Injury Risk in Master Swimmers
A study testing Exercises in people with Athletic Performance and Injury Risk, run by Marmara University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
The inclusion of dryland training and stabilization exercises is crucial for optimizing performance and reducing injury risk in master swimmers. Exercises targeting core stabilization play a significant role in enhancing overall body strength and endurance, thereby improving swimming performance. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 25 to 50 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Athletic Performance and Injury Risk
- What is being tested?
- Exercises
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 30 Jul 2024to 30 Nov 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 25 to 50 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Individuals aged 25-50
- Those who engage in swimming training at least 3-4 days a week
- Volunteers willing to participate in the study
- Licensed competitive swimmers
- Masters swimmers (A competitive swimming class for swimmers aged 25 and older, knowledgeable in swimming techniques and competing according to FINA (International Swimming Federation) rules) (https://www.worldaquatics.com/masters/latest; Accessed: 25.05.2024)
Who cannot join
- Individuals with chronic diseases affecting orthopedic, neurological, cardiovascular, or other systems
- Individuals with cognitive dysfunction
- Those who regularly engage in strength training
- Non-volunteers unwilling to participate in the study
- Individuals outside the age range of 25-50
- Any condition or discomfort that would hinder the performance of tests
- Having sustained a sports injury affecting swimming performance in the past six months
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Marmara University
Istanbul, Maltepe, 34854
Melda Çetin, 05304609111, cetinn.meldaa@gmail.com
Onur Aydoğdu, 05055377277, onur.aydogdu@marmara.edu.tr
About this study
The inclusion of dryland training and stabilization exercises is crucial for optimizing performance and reducing injury risk in master swimmers. Exercises targeting core stabilization play a significant role in enhancing overall body strength and endurance, thereby improving swimming performance. Shoulder stabilization exercises address common issues faced by swimmers, such as shoulder impingement and rotator cuff injuries, contributing to the prevention of such injuries. Incorporating these exercises into the training regimen enables master swimmers to improve their posture, balance, and strength, resulting in more efficient performance in the water and reduced injury risk. Thus, a comprehensive training approach that includes both aquatic and stabilization exercises is of great importance for sustaining performance and ensuring long-term health in master swimmers.
The aim of this study is to examine the effects of core and shoulder stabilization exercise training on athletic performance and injury risk in master swimmers. Our study is designed to include healthy swimmer participants. A minimum of 34 master swimmers aged between 25 and 50 years will be recruited for the study. Prior to the stabilization training program, participants will undergo several assessments including the Isometric Plank Test (Prone Bridge Test), Closed Kinetic Chain Test, Medicine Ball Throw Test, 50m Freestyle Test, and Functional Movement Screening for injury risk assessment. After initial testing, the control group will perform a 5-minute traditional dryland warm-up focusing on the shoulders, core, and lower extremities before swimming workouts. The experimental group will receive core and shoulder stabilization exercises in addition to the traditional dryland warm-up and routine swimming training for 6 weeks (2 days per week). To assess the effects of the intervention, all tests will be repeated at the beginning, at the end of the 6-week exercise program, and in the 12th week. The literature does not provide information on the relationship between combined core and shoulder stabilization exercises and performance or injury risk in swimmers. This study aims to address this gap in the literature by investigating whether there are significant differences in the results obtained from the exercises and to contribute to future research aimed at enhancing performance and reducing injury risk in athletes.
- Conditions
- Athletic Performance and Injury Risk
- Being tested
- Exercises
- Keywords
- Master Swimmers, Stabilization Exercises, Athletic Performance, Injury Risk Assesment
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ExercisesOther
During the research period, all participants will undergo swimming training for 1 hour per day, 3-4 days a week for 6 weeks. The control group will perform a 5-minute land warm-up covering traditional shoulder, torso, and leg areas before their routine swimming training. In addition to the traditional warm-up program and swimming training, the experimental group will also participate in core and shoulder stabilization exercises under the supervision of a physiotherapist.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Exercises Group | Experimental | Not described Receives: Other: Exercises |
| Control Group | No intervention | Not described |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Functional Movement Screen
The evaluation of injury risk in participants will be conducted purposefully. The Functional Movement Screening (FMS) will be used for this assessment (Lockie et al., 2015). The FMS consists of seven fundamental movements: deep squat, hurdle step, inline lunge, shoulder mobility, active straight-leg raise, trunk stability push-up, and rotary stability (Cook et al., 2006). Scoring will be performed based on observations: a score of 3 will be given when the movement is performed in the desired pattern, 2 points if the movement is partially or fully completed but with compensatory mechanisms used, 1 point if the movement is not completed, and 0 points if pain is present at any point during the movement. The total score for the athlete will be calculated by summing the scores obtained from each movement. If the athlete scores 14 or less, their functional movement capacity will be defined as low and the risk of injury will be considered high (Cook et al., 2006).
Measured: At the baseline
Functional Movement Screen
The evaluation of injury risk in participants will be conducted purposefully. The Functional Movement Screening (FMS) will be used for this assessment (Lockie et al., 2015). The FMS consists of seven fundamental movements: deep squat, hurdle step, inline lunge, shoulder mobility, active straight-leg raise, trunk stability push-up, and rotary stability (Cook et al., 2006). Scoring will be performed based on observations: a score of 3 will be given when the movement is performed in the desired pattern, 2 points if the movement is partially or fully completed but with compensatory mechanisms used, 1 point if the movement is not completed, and 0 points if pain is present at any point during the movement. The total score for the athlete will be calculated by summing the scores obtained from each movement. If the athlete scores 14 or less, their functional movement capacity will be defined as low and the risk of injury will be considered high (Cook et al., 2006).
Measured: Six week later
Functional Movement Screen
The evaluation of injury risk in participants will be conducted purposefully. The Functional Movement Screening (FMS) will be used for this assessment (Lockie et al., 2015). The FMS consists of seven fundamental movements: deep squat, hurdle step, inline lunge, shoulder mobility, active straight-leg raise, trunk stability push-up, and rotary stability (Cook et al., 2006). Scoring will be performed based on observations: a score of 3 will be given when the movement is performed in the desired pattern, 2 points if the movement is partially or fully completed but with compensatory mechanisms used, 1 point if the movement is not completed, and 0 points if pain is present at any point during the movement. The total score for the athlete will be calculated by summing the scores obtained from each movement. If the athlete scores 14 or less, their functional movement capacity will be defined as low and the risk of injury will be considered high (Cook et al., 2006).
Measured: Twelve week later
Secondary outcomes (12)
Prone Bridge Test
To assess participants' core endurance, an isometric plank test will be administered. Participants will be instructed to assume a push-up position with their elbows directly beneath their shoulders, forearms, and fingers extended straight ahead. The body should remain straight from the head to the heels, and the neck should be in a neutral position (Tong et al., 2014). When the participant reaches the correct position, the timer will start immediately. The test will be terminated if the participant cannot maintain a straight back or if the hips drop. The duration will be recorded in minutes and seconds using a stopwatch. The goal of this test is to hold the high position for as long as possible (Bohannon et al., 2018).
Measured: At the baseline
Prone Bridge Test
To assess participants' core endurance, an isometric plank test will be administered. Participants will be instructed to assume a push-up position with their elbows directly beneath their shoulders, forearms, and fingers extended straight ahead. The body should remain straight from the head to the heels, and the neck should be in a neutral position (Tong et al., 2014). When the participant reaches the correct position, the timer will start immediately. The test will be terminated if the participant cannot maintain a straight back or if the hips drop. The duration will be recorded in minutes and seconds using a stopwatch. The goal of this test is to hold the high position for as long as possible (Bohannon et al., 2018).
Measured: Six week later
Prone Bridge Test
To assess participants' core endurance, an isometric plank test will be administered. Participants will be instructed to assume a push-up position with their elbows directly beneath their shoulders, forearms, and fingers extended straight ahead. The body should remain straight from the head to the heels, and the neck should be in a neutral position (Tong et al., 2014). When the participant reaches the correct position, the timer will start immediately. The test will be terminated if the participant cannot maintain a straight back or if the hips drop. The duration will be recorded in minutes and seconds using a stopwatch. The goal of this test is to hold the high position for as long as possible (Bohannon et al., 2018).
Measured: Twelve week later
Closed Kinetic Chain Test
The Closed Kinetic Chain (CKC) test will be administered to assess the upper extremity stability of participants. To perform the test, men will assume a push-up position, while women will take a modified push-up position (knee push-up). Both will place their hands on two strips of tape spaced 91.4 cm (36 inches) apart, with the third finger touching the ground (Tucci et al., 2017). Participants must keep their bodies as straight as possible while maintaining their weight on the upper extremities. To start the test, the participant moves one hand from the tape line to the other side, touches the other hand, and then returns to the original line. The process is then repeated with the other hand, and this is done as many times as possible in 15 seconds (Tucci et al., 2017). The test is repeated three times with 45-second rest intervals between each attempt. The score will be calculated based on the arithmetic mean of the touches (de Oliveira et al., 2017).
Measured: At the baseline
Closed Kinetic Chain Test
The Closed Kinetic Chain (CKC) test will be administered to assess the upper extremity stability of participants. To perform the test, men will assume a push-up position, while women will take a modified push-up position (knee push-up). Both will place their hands on two strips of tape spaced 91.4 cm (36 inches) apart, with the third finger touching the ground (Tucci et al., 2017). Participants must keep their bodies as straight as possible while maintaining their weight on the upper extremities. To start the test, the participant moves one hand from the tape line to the other side, touches the other hand, and then returns to the original line. The process is then repeated with the other hand, and this is done as many times as possible in 15 seconds (Tucci et al., 2017). The test is repeated three times with 45-second rest intervals between each attempt. The score will be calculated based on the arithmetic mean of the touches (de Oliveira et al., 2017).
Measured: Six week later
Closed Kinetic Chain Test
The Closed Kinetic Chain (CKC) test will be administered to assess the upper extremity stability of participants. To perform the test, men will assume a push-up position, while women will take a modified push-up position (knee push-up). Both will place their hands on two strips of tape spaced 91.4 cm (36 inches) apart, with the third finger touching the ground (Tucci et al., 2017). Participants must keep their bodies as straight as possible while maintaining their weight on the upper extremities. To start the test, the participant moves one hand from the tape line to the other side, touches the other hand, and then returns to the original line. The process is then repeated with the other hand, and this is done as many times as possible in 15 seconds (Tucci et al., 2017). The test is repeated three times with 45-second rest intervals between each attempt. The score will be calculated based on the arithmetic mean of the touches (de Oliveira et al., 2017).
Measured: Twelve week later
Medicine Ball Throw Test
This test will be used to assess the open kinetic chain function and explosive power of the participants' upper extremities. For the test, the athlete will be positioned with their back, shoulders, and head touching the wall. A 3 kg medicine ball will be held with both hands and positioned to touch the chest wall. The athlete will be instructed to throw the medicine ball as far as possible in a straight line with a chest pass, without breaking contact with the wall (Shinkle et al., 2012). The athlete will be instructed not to "swing back" or "pump" the ball before initiating the throw in order to minimize momentum and muscle variation (Sharrock et al., 2011). The medicine ball throw will be performed twice, and the best distance will be used for evaluation. The point where the ball first touches the ground will be marked and measured in meters. A 1-minute rest will be provided between each throw (Shinkle et al., 2012).
Measured: At the baseline
Medicine Ball Throw Test
This test will be used to assess the open kinetic chain function and explosive power of the participants' upper extremities. For the test, the athlete will be positioned with their back, shoulders, and head touching the wall. A 3 kg medicine ball will be held with both hands and positioned to touch the chest wall. The athlete will be instructed to throw the medicine ball as far as possible in a straight line with a chest pass, without breaking contact with the wall (Shinkle et al., 2012). The athlete will be instructed not to "swing back" or "pump" the ball before initiating the throw in order to minimize momentum and muscle variation (Sharrock et al., 2011). The medicine ball throw will be performed twice, and the best distance will be used for evaluation. The point where the ball first touches the ground will be marked and measured in meters. A 1-minute rest will be provided between each throw (Shinkle et al., 2012).
Measured: Six week later
Medicine Ball Throw Test
This test will be used to assess the open kinetic chain function and explosive power of the participants' upper extremities. For the test, the athlete will be positioned with their back, shoulders, and head touching the wall. A 3 kg medicine ball will be held with both hands and positioned to touch the chest wall. The athlete will be instructed to throw the medicine ball as far as possible in a straight line with a chest pass, without breaking contact with the wall (Shinkle et al., 2012). The athlete will be instructed not to "swing back" or "pump" the ball before initiating the throw in order to minimize momentum and muscle variation (Sharrock et al., 2011). The medicine ball throw will be performed twice, and the best distance will be used for evaluation. The point where the ball first touches the ground will be marked and measured in meters. A 1-minute rest will be provided between each throw (Shinkle et al., 2012).
Measured: Twelve week later
50 m Freestyle Swimming Test
The 50 m freestyle swimming test will be administered to evaluate the swimming performance of the participants. Measurements will be conducted in a 25 m lane in a closed swimming pool. Before the test, athletes will perform land-based warm-up exercises and complete their warm-up with 200 m freestyle, 200 m kick drills, and 4x25 m sprint swimming (Soydan, 2006). The 50 m freestyle swimming performance will be tested with the athlete starting from the pool edge, pushing off the wall with both legs from within the water, without using a starting block. The stopwatch will be stopped as soon as the athlete touches the lane's edge.
Measured: At the baseline
50 m Freestyle Swimming Test
The 50 m freestyle swimming test will be administered to evaluate the swimming performance of the participants. Measurements will be conducted in a 25 m lane in a closed swimming pool. Before the test, athletes will perform land-based warm-up exercises and complete their warm-up with 200 m freestyle, 200 m kick drills, and 4x25 m sprint swimming (Soydan, 2006). The 50 m freestyle swimming performance will be tested with the athlete starting from the pool edge, pushing off the wall with both legs from within the water, without using a starting block. The stopwatch will be stopped as soon as the athlete touches the lane's edge.
Measured: Six week later
50 m Freestyle Swimming Test
The 50 m freestyle swimming test will be administered to evaluate the swimming performance of the participants. Measurements will be conducted in a 25 m lane in a closed swimming pool. Before the test, athletes will perform land-based warm-up exercises and complete their warm-up with 200 m freestyle, 200 m kick drills, and 4x25 m sprint swimming (Soydan, 2006). The 50 m freestyle swimming performance will be tested with the athlete starting from the pool edge, pushing off the wall with both legs from within the water, without using a starting block. The stopwatch will be stopped as soon as the athlete touches the lane's edge.
Measured: Twelve week later
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Nov 2024
- Study start30 Jul 2024
- Primary completion30 Oct 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Nov 2024 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Athletic Performance and Injury RiskStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Marmara UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Marmara University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06681311
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MarmaraU- AYDOĞDU- ÇETİN001
- Status last verified
- Jul 2024
- First submitted
- 7 Nov 2024
- Last updated
- 8 Nov 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Nov 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effects of Core and Shoulder Stabilization Exercises on Athletic Performance and Injury Risk in Master Swimmers
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06681311
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MarmaraU- AYDOĞDU- ÇETİN001
- Conditions
- Athletic Performance and Injury Risk
- Keywords
- Master Swimmers, Stabilization Exercises, Athletic Performance, Injury Risk Assesment
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Marmara UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 30 Jul 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Oct 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Nov 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 8 Nov 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The inclusion of dryland training and stabilization exercises is crucial for optimizing performance and reducing injury risk in master swimmers. Exercises targeting core stabilization play a significant role in enhancing overall body strength and endurance, thereby improving swimming performance. Shoulder stabilization exercises address common issues faced by swimmers, such as shoulder impingement and rotator cuff injuries, contributing to the prevention of such injuries. Incorporating these exercises into the training regimen enables master swimmers to improve their posture, balance, and strength, resulting in more efficient performance in the water and reduced injury risk. Thus, a comprehensive training approach that includes both aquatic and stabilization exercises is of great importance for sustaining performance and ensuring long-term health in master swimmers.
The aim of this study is to examine the effects of core and shoulder stabilization exercise training on athletic performance and injury risk in master swimmers. Our study is designed to include healthy swimmer participants. A minimum of 34 master swimmers aged between 25 and 50 years will be recruited for the study. Prior to the stabilization training program, participants will undergo several assessments including the Isometric Plank Test (Prone Bridge Test), Closed Kinetic Chain Test, Medicine Ball Throw Test, 50m Freestyle Test, and Functional Movement Screening for injury risk assessment. After initial testing, the control group will perform a 5-minute traditional dryland warm-up focusing on the shoulders, core, and lower extremities before swimming workouts. The experimental group will receive core and shoulder stabilization exercises in addition to the traditional dryland warm-up and routine swimming training for 6 weeks (2 days per week). To assess the effects of the intervention, all tests will be repeated at the beginning, at the end of the 6-week exercise program, and in the 12th week. The literature does not provide information on the relationship between combined core and shoulder stabilization exercises and performance or injury risk in swimmers. This study aims to address this gap in the literature by investigating whether there are significant differences in the results obtained from the exercises and to contribute to future research aimed at enhancing performance and reducing injury risk in athletes.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Exercises Group | Experimental | Other: Exercises |
| Control Group | No intervention | – |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 25 to 50 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Individuals aged 25-50
- Those who engage in swimming training at least 3-4 days a week
- Volunteers willing to participate in the study
- Licensed competitive swimmers
- Masters swimmers (A competitive swimming class for swimmers aged 25 and older, knowledgeable in swimming techniques and competing according to FINA (International Swimming Federation) rules) (https://www.worldaquatics.com/masters/latest; Accessed: 25.05.2024)
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Individuals with chronic diseases affecting orthopedic, neurological, cardiovascular, or other systems
- Individuals with cognitive dysfunction
- Those who regularly engage in strength training
- Non-volunteers unwilling to participate in the study
- Individuals outside the age range of 25-50
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ExercisesDuring the research period, all participants will undergo swimming training for 1 hour per day, 3-4 days a week for 6 weeks. The control group will perform a 5-minute land warm-up covering traditional shoulder, torso, and leg areas before their routine swimming training. In addition to the traditional warm-up program and swimming training, the experimental group will also participate in core and shoulder stabilization exercises under the supervision of a physiotherapist. | Other | Exercises Group |
Primary outcome
Functional Movement Screen
Time frame: At the baseline
The evaluation of injury risk in participants will be conducted purposefully. The Functional Movement Screening (FMS) will be used for this assessment (Lockie et al., 2015). The FMS consists of seven fundamental movements: deep squat, hurdle step, inline lunge, shoulder mobility, active straight-leg raise, trunk stability push-up, and rotary stability (Cook et al., 2006). Scoring will be performed based on observations: a score of 3 will be given when the movement is performed in the desired pattern, 2 points if the movement is partially or fully completed but with compensatory mechanisms used, 1 point if the movement is not completed, and 0 points if pain is present at any point during the movement. The total score for the athlete will be calculated by summing the scores obtained from each movement. If the athlete scores 14 or less, their functional movement capacity will be defined as low and the risk of injury will be considered high (Cook et al., 2006).
Functional Movement Screen
Time frame: Six week later
The evaluation of injury risk in participants will be conducted purposefully. The Functional Movement Screening (FMS) will be used for this assessment (Lockie et al., 2015). The FMS consists of seven fundamental movements: deep squat, hurdle step, inline lunge, shoulder mobility, active straight-leg raise, trunk stability push-up, and rotary stability (Cook et al., 2006). Scoring will be performed based on observations: a score of 3 will be given when the movement is performed in the desired pattern, 2 points if the movement is partially or fully completed but with compensatory mechanisms used, 1 point if the movement is not completed, and 0 points if pain is present at any point during the movement. The total score for the athlete will be calculated by summing the scores obtained from each movement. If the athlete scores 14 or less, their functional movement capacity will be defined as low and the risk of injury will be considered high (Cook et al., 2006).
Functional Movement Screen
Time frame: Twelve week later
The evaluation of injury risk in participants will be conducted purposefully. The Functional Movement Screening (FMS) will be used for this assessment (Lockie et al., 2015). The FMS consists of seven fundamental movements: deep squat, hurdle step, inline lunge, shoulder mobility, active straight-leg raise, trunk stability push-up, and rotary stability (Cook et al., 2006). Scoring will be performed based on observations: a score of 3 will be given when the movement is performed in the desired pattern, 2 points if the movement is partially or fully completed but with compensatory mechanisms used, 1 point if the movement is not completed, and 0 points if pain is present at any point during the movement. The total score for the athlete will be calculated by summing the scores obtained from each movement. If the athlete scores 14 or less, their functional movement capacity will be defined as low and the risk of injury will be considered high (Cook et al., 2006).
12 secondary outcomes
Prone Bridge Test
Time frame: At the baseline
Prone Bridge Test
Time frame: Six week later
Prone Bridge Test
Time frame: Twelve week later
Closed Kinetic Chain Test
Time frame: At the baseline
Closed Kinetic Chain Test
Time frame: Six week later
Closed Kinetic Chain Test
Time frame: Twelve week later
Medicine Ball Throw Test
Time frame: At the baseline
Medicine Ball Throw Test
Time frame: Six week later
Medicine Ball Throw Test
Time frame: Twelve week later
50 m Freestyle Swimming Test
Time frame: At the baseline
50 m Freestyle Swimming Test
Time frame: Six week later
50 m Freestyle Swimming Test
Time frame: Twelve week later
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Nov 2024.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Athletic Performance and Injury Risk
Recruiting
Effects of Carbon Fiber Insoles on CMJ and Sprint Performance
Healthy, Sportsman
Enrolling by invitation
Integrated Neuromuscular Training Improves Jump Height and Landing Mechanics in Male Volleyball Athletes
Sports Injuries, Athletic Performance and Injury Risk
Recruiting
Isometric and Isotonic Hand Strengthening in Competitive Female Badminton Athletes
Athletic Performance and Injury Risk
Not yet recruiting
Analysis of New Materials and Artificial Turf Products: Influence and Impact on Athlete Performance and Perception
Artificial Turf, Athletic Performance and Injury Risk
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Exercises in people with Athletic Performance and Injury Risk, run by Marmara University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Nov 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Melda Çetin, Physiotherapist (05304609111, cetinn.meldaa@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Functional Movement Screen (time frame: At the baseline). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Nov 2024; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.