AzTrials
AzTrials

Low Back PainNCT06686264

Effects of Core Stability Exercises on Motor Control in Patients With Low Back Pain.

A study testing core stability group A and traditional exercises group B in people with Low Back Pain, run by Riphah International University at 1 site in Pakistan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this research is aims to evaluate the effectiveness of core stability exercise on motor control, pain and disability in patients with low back pain. Randomized controlled trials will be done at Rehman Medical Institute. The sample size was 44. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 30 to 50 years
Conditions the study is for
Low Back Pain
What is being tested?
core stability group A and traditional exercises group B
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
44 participants
Where
1 sitePakistan
Study dates
1 Sep 2024to 16 Apr 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 30 to 50 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Both gender Presence of back pain for ≥6 weeks
  • Age 30 -50 years
  • MCI (Motor Control Impairment) complaints (pain provocation in static posture)
  • Participants had 3 or more positive test out of six MCI tests.

Who cannot join

  • LBP of specific cause, Recent spine surgery (<6 weeks)
  • Comorbid health condition(Spondylolesthesis, fracture, Spondylolysis)
  • Constant pain below knee
  • Patient who denied consent

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Pakistan1 site
  • Rehman Medical Institute

    Peshawar, Khybar Pakhtunkha, 25000

Other trials in Pakistan

About this study

The aim of this research is aims to evaluate the effectiveness of core stability exercise on motor control, pain and disability in patients with low back pain.

Randomized controlled trials will be done at Rehman Medical Institute. The sample size was 44. The subjects were divided in two groups, 22 subjects were given conventional therapy and 22 were given conventional therapy along with core stability exercises. Study duration was of 6 months. Sampling technique applied was non probability convenience sampling technique. Patient with age 30-50 years both Male \&amp; female gender Presence of back pain for ≥6 weeks, MCI (Motor Control Impairment) complaints (pain provocation in static posture) with 3 or more positive tests were included. Tools used in the study are NPRS, ODI, and MCI tests.

Read the detailed description

: Low back pain is a major health and socioeconomic problem and is associated with high costs in care, work absenteeism, and disability worldwide. According to evidence-based guidelines up to 90% of all Low Back Pain is classified as non-specific low back pain (NSLBP).Low back pain affects most people at some point in their lives, with up to an 84% lifetime prevalence and the prevalence depends on factors such as gender, age, educational level and occupation.

The underlying hypothesis is that impaired motor control (MC) and a lack of awareness of maladaptive movement patterns perpetuate Low Back Pain. Physiotherapists make clinical decisions based on the observation of movement control. O'Sullivan describes back pain patients with reduced Motor Control and excessive movement as pain provocateurs. Movement impairment syndromes and the detection of disordered movement, or pathokinesiology, is a key competence of physiotherapy. Pathokinesiologic movement patterns in the lumbar spine have been investigated and described, resulting in the publication of both reliability and validation studies of the examination procedures used. However, no clear evidence exists as to whether improvement in movement control can also lead to decreased pain and experienced daily disability in patients with NSLBP. Patients with Motor Control Impairment MCI present with mechanically induced pain in static postures together with visible movement abnormalities, such as decreased or increased movement of parts of the lumbar spine, or discrepancies in the proportion of hip, leg and spine movements. It is assumed that these movement abnormalities are influenced by current pain, previous pain episodes and the belief that pain provoked by movement is harmful. Patients exhibiting Motor Control Impairment demonstrate clinical features that can be screened with the aid of various clinical tests. Based on this principle, treatment aimed at restoring movement control, correcting movement patterns and avoiding pain-provoking postures could benefit patients with MCI.

The European Guidelines for Management of Chronic Non-Specific LBP recommend supervised exercise therapy as a first-line treatment for chronic Low Back Pain LBP. Exercise is the main treatment for chronic low back pain (CLBP) which is endorsed in most clinical practice guidelines. There is controversy over the most beneficial exercise, and there is little evidence that a particular kind of exercise is superior to another one.

In literature, there are studies which have been carried out for the effectiveness of exercises based on specific movement control findings in the low back, formed the justification for current study to evaluate core stability exercises in a subgroup of patients with non-specific LBP and impaired movement control or Motor control Impairment. Widely used synonyms for movement impairment syndromes are motor control dysfunctions and MC impairment. A study in Switzerland was carried out to observe improvement in Motor Control, decreased pain and disability in patients with NSLBP pain. The biggest effect was shown in the improvement of movement control ability following specific exercise intervention. A significant difference between patients with LBP and subjects without back pain regarding their ability to actively control the movements of the low back has been demonstrated in a study. One study was carried out to see the effects of movement control exercises versus general exercises on the disability and pain to patients with NSLBP and MCI but they both appeared equally effective in the patient subgroup included in this study After reviewing existing literature, it is notable that core stability exercises and other specific exercises have been frequently employed in studies focusing on the treatment of non-specific low back pain, yielding promising results in reducing pain and disability among patients. It is from evidence that patients with NSLBP exhibit Motor Control Impairments. Dysfunction or weakness in the core musculature can disrupt this balance, leading to altered movement patterns and impaired motor control. However, a significant gap persists in the literature regarding the investigation of the effects of core stability exercises on motor control impairment. While core stability exercises have demonstrated efficacy in addressing pain and disability outcomes, their specific impact on motor control impairment in patients with low back pain remains underexplored. This gap underscores the need for further research to elucidate the potential benefits of core stability exercises on motor control in this patient population.

Conditions
Low Back Pain
Being tested
core stability group A, traditional exercises group B
Keywords
motor control, low back pain, core stability, motor control impairment
Medical subject headings
Low Back Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • core stability group AOther

    Abdominal hollowing in supine (10 reps \& 2 sets) Single leg bridge (10 reps \& 2 sets), 3 session per week for 6 weeks Prone Single leg raise(10 reps \& 2 sets) Double leg bridge (10 reps \& 2 sets) Abdominal hallowing in 4 point kneeling(10 reps \& 2 sets), Complete Back stretch Pelvic rotations Posterior Pelvic tilt Knee to chest Piriformis stretch Maitland mobilization ( based on assessment) 10 reps 10 sec hold 2 session per day

  • traditional exercises group BOther

    Complete Back stretch Pelvic rotations, 3 sessions per week for 6 week Posterior Pelvic tilt Knee to chest Piriformis stretch Maitland mobilization ( based on assessment) 10 reps 10 sec hold 2 session per day

Study groups in NCT06686264
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Core stability Group AExperimentalthe core stability group includes core stability exercises along with the general back, pelvis and piriformis stretches
Receives: Other: core stability group A
Traditional therapy group BActive comparatorthe traditional group includes general back, pelvis and piriformis stretches
Receives: Other: traditional exercises group B

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. MCI tests

    First test is Waiters Bow test which includes flexion of hip 50-70⁰ in upright standing without movement (flexion) of low back. The second test is dorsal pelvic tilt in upright standing keeping thoracic spine neutral and lumbar spine moves towards flexion. The third tests involves normal standing to single leg stance and measurement of lateral movement of belly. Fourth test is upright sitting with knee extension. In this position lumbar spine should be neutral.

    Fifth test is quadruped position with pelvis moving back and fro i.e. rocking with low back in neutral. Hip should be flex 90-120⁰. The last test is prone lying with active knee flexion up to 90⁰ without movement of low back and pelvis. If 3 out 6 tests are positive then subject will be categorized as impaired motor control.

    Measured: baseline to 6 weeks

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. NPRS

    The NPRS is a self-reported, or clinician administered, measurement tool consisting of a numerical point scale with extreme anchors of 'no pain' to 'extreme pain'. The scale is typically set up on a horizontal or vertical line, ranges most commonly from 0-10 or 0-100, and can be administered in written or verbal form. The patient is asked to rate his/her pain intensity and a particular time frame or descriptor is established (e.g. within the last 24 hours, today, worst pain, average pain, or least pain

    Measured: baseline to 6 weeks

  2. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI

    The Oswestry Disability Index (aka the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire) is an extremely important tool that researchers and disability evaluators use to measure a patient's permanent functional disability. There are 10 questions, for each question there is a possible 5 points; 0 for the first answer, 1 for the second answer, etc. Add up the total for the 10 questions and rate them on the scale at right. Indicating Mild, Moderate, Severe, Complete or No disability.

    Measured: baseline to 6 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Nov 2024
  2. Study start1 Sep 2024
  3. Primary completion30 Mar 2025
  4. Study completion16 Apr 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
44 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06686264
Sponsor's protocol ID
Riphah IU Saman
Status last verified
Apr 2025
First submitted
12 Nov 2024
Last updated
18 Apr 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing core stability group A and traditional exercises group B in people with Low Back Pain, run by Riphah International University at 1 site in Pakistan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Apr 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Pakistan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

MCI tests (time frame: baseline to 6 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Apr 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in