Low Back PainNCT06686264
Effects of Core Stability Exercises on Motor Control in Patients With Low Back Pain.
A study testing core stability group A and traditional exercises group B in people with Low Back Pain, run by Riphah International University at 1 site in Pakistan.
Trial summary
The aim of this research is aims to evaluate the effectiveness of core stability exercise on motor control, pain and disability in patients with low back pain. Randomized controlled trials will be done at Rehman Medical Institute. The sample size was 44. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 30 to 50 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Low Back Pain
- What is being tested?
- core stability group A and traditional exercises group B
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 44 participants
- Where
- 1 sitePakistan
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2024to 16 Apr 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 30 to 50 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Both gender Presence of back pain for ≥6 weeks
- Age 30 -50 years
- MCI (Motor Control Impairment) complaints (pain provocation in static posture)
- Participants had 3 or more positive test out of six MCI tests.
Who cannot join
- LBP of specific cause, Recent spine surgery (<6 weeks)
- Comorbid health condition(Spondylolesthesis, fracture, Spondylolysis)
- Constant pain below knee
- Patient who denied consent
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
The aim of this research is aims to evaluate the effectiveness of core stability exercise on motor control, pain and disability in patients with low back pain.
Randomized controlled trials will be done at Rehman Medical Institute. The sample size was 44. The subjects were divided in two groups, 22 subjects were given conventional therapy and 22 were given conventional therapy along with core stability exercises. Study duration was of 6 months. Sampling technique applied was non probability convenience sampling technique. Patient with age 30-50 years both Male \& female gender Presence of back pain for ≥6 weeks, MCI (Motor Control Impairment) complaints (pain provocation in static posture) with 3 or more positive tests were included. Tools used in the study are NPRS, ODI, and MCI tests.
Read the detailed description
: Low back pain is a major health and socioeconomic problem and is associated with high costs in care, work absenteeism, and disability worldwide. According to evidence-based guidelines up to 90% of all Low Back Pain is classified as non-specific low back pain (NSLBP).Low back pain affects most people at some point in their lives, with up to an 84% lifetime prevalence and the prevalence depends on factors such as gender, age, educational level and occupation.
The underlying hypothesis is that impaired motor control (MC) and a lack of awareness of maladaptive movement patterns perpetuate Low Back Pain. Physiotherapists make clinical decisions based on the observation of movement control. O'Sullivan describes back pain patients with reduced Motor Control and excessive movement as pain provocateurs. Movement impairment syndromes and the detection of disordered movement, or pathokinesiology, is a key competence of physiotherapy. Pathokinesiologic movement patterns in the lumbar spine have been investigated and described, resulting in the publication of both reliability and validation studies of the examination procedures used. However, no clear evidence exists as to whether improvement in movement control can also lead to decreased pain and experienced daily disability in patients with NSLBP. Patients with Motor Control Impairment MCI present with mechanically induced pain in static postures together with visible movement abnormalities, such as decreased or increased movement of parts of the lumbar spine, or discrepancies in the proportion of hip, leg and spine movements. It is assumed that these movement abnormalities are influenced by current pain, previous pain episodes and the belief that pain provoked by movement is harmful. Patients exhibiting Motor Control Impairment demonstrate clinical features that can be screened with the aid of various clinical tests. Based on this principle, treatment aimed at restoring movement control, correcting movement patterns and avoiding pain-provoking postures could benefit patients with MCI.
The European Guidelines for Management of Chronic Non-Specific LBP recommend supervised exercise therapy as a first-line treatment for chronic Low Back Pain LBP. Exercise is the main treatment for chronic low back pain (CLBP) which is endorsed in most clinical practice guidelines. There is controversy over the most beneficial exercise, and there is little evidence that a particular kind of exercise is superior to another one.
In literature, there are studies which have been carried out for the effectiveness of exercises based on specific movement control findings in the low back, formed the justification for current study to evaluate core stability exercises in a subgroup of patients with non-specific LBP and impaired movement control or Motor control Impairment. Widely used synonyms for movement impairment syndromes are motor control dysfunctions and MC impairment. A study in Switzerland was carried out to observe improvement in Motor Control, decreased pain and disability in patients with NSLBP pain. The biggest effect was shown in the improvement of movement control ability following specific exercise intervention. A significant difference between patients with LBP and subjects without back pain regarding their ability to actively control the movements of the low back has been demonstrated in a study. One study was carried out to see the effects of movement control exercises versus general exercises on the disability and pain to patients with NSLBP and MCI but they both appeared equally effective in the patient subgroup included in this study After reviewing existing literature, it is notable that core stability exercises and other specific exercises have been frequently employed in studies focusing on the treatment of non-specific low back pain, yielding promising results in reducing pain and disability among patients. It is from evidence that patients with NSLBP exhibit Motor Control Impairments. Dysfunction or weakness in the core musculature can disrupt this balance, leading to altered movement patterns and impaired motor control. However, a significant gap persists in the literature regarding the investigation of the effects of core stability exercises on motor control impairment. While core stability exercises have demonstrated efficacy in addressing pain and disability outcomes, their specific impact on motor control impairment in patients with low back pain remains underexplored. This gap underscores the need for further research to elucidate the potential benefits of core stability exercises on motor control in this patient population.
- Conditions
- Low Back Pain
- Being tested
- core stability group A, traditional exercises group B
- Keywords
- motor control, low back pain, core stability, motor control impairment
- Medical subject headings
- Low Back Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
core stability group AOther
Abdominal hollowing in supine (10 reps \& 2 sets) Single leg bridge (10 reps \& 2 sets), 3 session per week for 6 weeks Prone Single leg raise(10 reps \& 2 sets) Double leg bridge (10 reps \& 2 sets) Abdominal hallowing in 4 point kneeling(10 reps \& 2 sets), Complete Back stretch Pelvic rotations Posterior Pelvic tilt Knee to chest Piriformis stretch Maitland mobilization ( based on assessment) 10 reps 10 sec hold 2 session per day
traditional exercises group BOther
Complete Back stretch Pelvic rotations, 3 sessions per week for 6 week Posterior Pelvic tilt Knee to chest Piriformis stretch Maitland mobilization ( based on assessment) 10 reps 10 sec hold 2 session per day
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Core stability Group A | Experimental | the core stability group includes core stability exercises along with the general back, pelvis and piriformis stretches Receives: Other: core stability group A |
| Traditional therapy group B | Active comparator | the traditional group includes general back, pelvis and piriformis stretches Receives: Other: traditional exercises group B |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
MCI tests
First test is Waiters Bow test which includes flexion of hip 50-70⁰ in upright standing without movement (flexion) of low back. The second test is dorsal pelvic tilt in upright standing keeping thoracic spine neutral and lumbar spine moves towards flexion. The third tests involves normal standing to single leg stance and measurement of lateral movement of belly. Fourth test is upright sitting with knee extension. In this position lumbar spine should be neutral.
Fifth test is quadruped position with pelvis moving back and fro i.e. rocking with low back in neutral. Hip should be flex 90-120⁰. The last test is prone lying with active knee flexion up to 90⁰ without movement of low back and pelvis. If 3 out 6 tests are positive then subject will be categorized as impaired motor control.
Measured: baseline to 6 weeks
Secondary outcomes (2)
NPRS
The NPRS is a self-reported, or clinician administered, measurement tool consisting of a numerical point scale with extreme anchors of 'no pain' to 'extreme pain'. The scale is typically set up on a horizontal or vertical line, ranges most commonly from 0-10 or 0-100, and can be administered in written or verbal form. The patient is asked to rate his/her pain intensity and a particular time frame or descriptor is established (e.g. within the last 24 hours, today, worst pain, average pain, or least pain
Measured: baseline to 6 weeks
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI
The Oswestry Disability Index (aka the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire) is an extremely important tool that researchers and disability evaluators use to measure a patient's permanent functional disability. There are 10 questions, for each question there is a possible 5 points; 0 for the first answer, 1 for the second answer, etc. Add up the total for the 10 questions and rate them on the scale at right. Indicating Mild, Moderate, Severe, Complete or No disability.
Measured: baseline to 6 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Nov 2024
- Study start1 Sep 2024
- Primary completion30 Mar 2025
- Study completion16 Apr 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Low Back PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Riphah International UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 44 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Riphah International University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Aisha Razzaq, PHD*, Principal investigator, Riphah International University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06686264
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Riphah IU Saman
- Status last verified
- Apr 2025
- First submitted
- 12 Nov 2024
- Last updated
- 18 Apr 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Apr 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effects of Core Stability Exercises on Motor Control in Patients With Low Back Pain.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06686264
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Riphah IU Saman
- Conditions
- Low Back Pain
- Keywords
- motor control, low back pain, core stability, motor control impairment
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 44 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Riphah International UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Mar 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 16 Apr 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Nov 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this research is aims to evaluate the effectiveness of core stability exercise on motor control, pain and disability in patients with low back pain.
Randomized controlled trials will be done at Rehman Medical Institute. The sample size was 44. The subjects were divided in two groups, 22 subjects were given conventional therapy and 22 were given conventional therapy along with core stability exercises. Study duration was of 6 months. Sampling technique applied was non probability convenience sampling technique. Patient with age 30-50 years both Male \& female gender Presence of back pain for ≥6 weeks, MCI (Motor Control Impairment) complaints (pain provocation in static posture) with 3 or more positive tests were included. Tools used in the study are NPRS, ODI, and MCI tests.
Detailed description
: Low back pain is a major health and socioeconomic problem and is associated with high costs in care, work absenteeism, and disability worldwide. According to evidence-based guidelines up to 90% of all Low Back Pain is classified as non-specific low back pain (NSLBP).Low back pain affects most people at some point in their lives, with up to an 84% lifetime prevalence and the prevalence depends on factors such as gender, age, educational level and occupation.
The underlying hypothesis is that impaired motor control (MC) and a lack of awareness of maladaptive movement patterns perpetuate Low Back Pain. Physiotherapists make clinical decisions based on the observation of movement control. O'Sullivan describes back pain patients with reduced Motor Control and excessive movement as pain provocateurs. Movement impairment syndromes and the detection of disordered movement, or pathokinesiology, is a key competence of physiotherapy. Pathokinesiologic movement patterns in the lumbar spine have been investigated and described, resulting in the publication of both reliability and validation studies of the examination procedures used. However, no clear evidence exists as to whether improvement in movement control can also lead to decreased pain and experienced daily disability in patients with NSLBP. Patients with Motor Control Impairment MCI present with mechanically induced pain in static postures together with visible movement abnormalities, such as decreased or increased movement of parts of the lumbar spine, or discrepancies in the proportion of hip, leg and spine movements. It is assumed that these movement abnormalities are influenced by current pain, previous pain episodes and the belief that pain provoked by movement is harmful. Patients exhibiting Motor Control Impairment demonstrate clinical features that can be screened with the aid of various clinical tests. Based on this principle, treatment aimed at restoring movement control, correcting movement patterns and avoiding pain-provoking postures could benefit patients with MCI.
The European Guidelines for Management of Chronic Non-Specific LBP recommend supervised exercise therapy as a first-line treatment for chronic Low Back Pain LBP. Exercise is the main treatment for chronic low back pain (CLBP) which is endorsed in most clinical practice guidelines. There is controversy over the most beneficial exercise, and there is little evidence that a particular kind of exercise is superior to another one.
In literature, there are studies which have been carried out for the effectiveness of exercises based on specific movement control findings in the low back, formed the justification for current study to evaluate core stability exercises in a subgroup of patients with non-specific LBP and impaired movement control or Motor control Impairment. Widely used synonyms for movement impairment syndromes are motor control dysfunctions and MC impairment. A study in Switzerland was carried out to observe improvement in Motor Control, decreased pain and disability in patients with NSLBP pain. The biggest effect was shown in the improvement of movement control ability following specific exercise intervention. A significant difference between patients with LBP and subjects without back pain regarding their ability to actively control the movements of the low back has been demonstrated in a study. One study was carried out to see the effects of movement control exercises versus general exercises on the disability and pain to patients with NSLBP and MCI but they both appeared equally effective in the patient subgroup included in this study After reviewing existing literature, it is notable that core stability exercises and other specific exercises have been frequently employed in studies focusing on the treatment of non-specific low back pain, yielding promising results in reducing pain and disability among patients. It is from evidence that patients with NSLBP exhibit Motor Control Impairments. Dysfunction or weakness in the core musculature can disrupt this balance, leading to altered movement patterns and impaired motor control. However, a significant gap persists in the literature regarding the investigation of the effects of core stability exercises on motor control impairment. While core stability exercises have demonstrated efficacy in addressing pain and disability outcomes, their specific impact on motor control impairment in patients with low back pain remains underexplored. This gap underscores the need for further research to elucidate the potential benefits of core stability exercises on motor control in this patient population.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Core stability Group A | Experimental | Other: core stability group Athe core stability group includes core stability exercises along with the general back, pelvis and piriformis stretches |
| Traditional therapy group B | Active comparator | Other: traditional exercises group Bthe traditional group includes general back, pelvis and piriformis stretches |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 30 to 50 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Both gender Presence of back pain for ≥6 weeks
- Age 30 -50 years
- MCI (Motor Control Impairment) complaints (pain provocation in static posture)
- Participants had 3 or more positive test out of six MCI tests.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- LBP of specific cause, Recent spine surgery (<6 weeks)
- Comorbid health condition(Spondylolesthesis, fracture, Spondylolysis)
- Constant pain below knee
- Patient who denied consent
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| core stability group AAbdominal hollowing in supine (10 reps \& 2 sets) Single leg bridge (10 reps \& 2 sets), 3 session per week for 6 weeks Prone Single leg raise(10 reps \& 2 sets) Double leg bridge (10 reps \& 2 sets) Abdominal hallowing in 4 point kneeling(10 reps \& 2 sets), Complete Back stretch Pelvic rotations Posterior Pelvic tilt Knee to chest Piriformis stretch Maitland mobilization ( based on assessment) 10 reps 10 sec hold 2 session per day | Other | Core stability Group A |
| traditional exercises group BComplete Back stretch Pelvic rotations, 3 sessions per week for 6 week Posterior Pelvic tilt Knee to chest Piriformis stretch Maitland mobilization ( based on assessment) 10 reps 10 sec hold 2 session per day | Other | Traditional therapy group B |
Primary outcome
MCI tests
Time frame: baseline to 6 weeks
First test is Waiters Bow test which includes flexion of hip 50-70⁰ in upright standing without movement (flexion) of low back. The second test is dorsal pelvic tilt in upright standing keeping thoracic spine neutral and lumbar spine moves towards flexion. The third tests involves normal standing to single leg stance and measurement of lateral movement of belly. Fourth test is upright sitting with knee extension. In this position lumbar spine should be neutral. Fifth test is quadruped position with pelvis moving back and fro i.e. rocking with low back in neutral. Hip should be flex 90-120⁰. The last test is prone lying with active knee flexion up to 90⁰ without movement of low back and pelvis. If 3 out 6 tests are positive then subject will be categorized as impaired motor control.
2 secondary outcomes
NPRS
Time frame: baseline to 6 weeks
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI
Time frame: baseline to 6 weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Apr 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Hip Hinge Exercises on Pain, Range of Motion and Functional Disability in Non-specific Low Back Pain.
Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Lumbar Stabilization Exercises With and Without YTWL (Scapular Stabilization Exercises) on Reducing Chronic Low Back Pain and Related Disability. A Randomized Clinical Trial,
Chronic Non Specific Mechanical Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Comparing Non-Medicine Strategies for Improving Low Back Pain
Chronic Low-back Pain (cLBP), High-Impact Chronic Pain (HICP)
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Whole-Body Vibration and Cervical Stabilization With Core Stabilization in Young Adults With Non-Specific Low Back Pain
Nonspecific Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Spinery Basivertebral Nerve Ablation for Vertebrogenic Chronic Low Back Pain
Low Back Pain, Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Aisha Razzaq, PHD* principal investigator
Riphah International University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing core stability group A and traditional exercises group B in people with Low Back Pain, run by Riphah International University at 1 site in Pakistan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Apr 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Pakistan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
MCI tests (time frame: baseline to 6 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Apr 2025.