AzTrials
AzTrials

Chronic Myeloid LeukemiaABL-2022-03NCT06692803

Real-World Treatment Patterns and Outcomes Among Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Earlier Lines of Therapy

An observational study of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This was a retrospective, non-interventional, observational cohort study using Optum's de-identified Clinformatics® Data Mart Database. Adult patients newly diagnosed with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) were identified using the Optum database and classified into the… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia
How many people
2,043 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
23 May 2023to 30 Nov 2023
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: This was a retrospective, noninterventional cohort study.

Who may be able to join

  • Adult patients who initiated their first treatment with imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib, or bosutinib (conditional on Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval dates) with 6 months continuous health plan enrollment prior to the first prescription fill date.
  • Patients with 2 or more diagnoses for CML (adult as of the first diagnosis for CML).
  • Patients had index date on or after first CML diagnosis.
  • Patients had no diagnoses for CML remission/relapse prior to index date.
  • Patients had no gastrointestinal stomach tumor (GIST) or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) at any time.
  • Patients had no medical claims associated with a clinical trial during the baseline period.
Show all 16Show fewer
  • Patients had no hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) during the baseline period.
  • Patients had no CML-related chemotherapy treatments for accelerated phase (AP)/blast crisis (BC) during the baseline period.
  • First treatment cohort:
  • Patients started first treatment for CML with imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib, or bosutinib in 2012 or later.
  • Patients had no HSCT during the first treatment baseline period.
  • Patients had no CML-related chemotherapy treatment for AP/BC during the first treatment baseline period.
  • Second treatment cohort:
  • Patients started second treatment for CML with imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib, or bosutinib in 2012 or later.
  • Patients had no HSCT from the first treatment baseline period up to second treatment initiation.
  • Patients had no CML-related chemotherapy treatment for AP/BC from the first treatment baseline period up to second treatment initiation.

Who cannot join

None listed.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Novartis

    East Hanover, New Jersey, 07936

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Real-World Treatment Patterns and Outcomes Among Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Earlier Lines of Therapy (ABL-2022-03)

This was a retrospective, non-interventional, observational cohort study using Optum's de-identified Clinformatics® Data Mart Database. Adult patients newly diagnosed with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) were identified using the Optum database and classified into the following cohorts:

  • First treatment cohort: Patients newly diagnosed with CML who received first treatment with a TKI.
  • Second treatment cohort: Patients from first treatment cohort with a subsequent line of therapy (i.e., second treatment) with a TKI.

The observation period spanned from the start of data availability (i.e., 01 January 2007) to the earliest of end of data (i.e., 30 June 2022), end of continuous health plan enrollment, or death (if available). The index date was defined as the first treatment initiation for the first treatment TKI cohort and as the second treatment initiation for the second treatment TKI cohort. The baseline period consisted of the 6 months prior to the index date. The follow-up period started on the index date and ended at the earliest of end of observation period or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).

Medical subject headings
Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT06692803
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
First Treatment CohortPatients newly diagnosed with CML who received first treatment with imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib, or bosutinib.
Second Treatment CohortPatients from first treatment cohort with a subsequent line of therapy (i.e., second treatment) with imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib, bosutinib, or ponatinib.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Treatment Patterns

    Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment management patterns in CML patients on first line or second line TKI were assessed.

    Measured: Up to approximately 10 years

Secondary outcomes (17)
  1. Proportion of Days Covered (PDC)

    PDC was defined as the number of days of medication covered divided by the number of calendar days during the study period. The study period spanned from index date to the next line of therapy initiation (switch), hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), initiation of a CML-related chemotherapy for accelerated phase (AP)/blast crisis (BC) (day prior to HSCT/CML chemotherapy) or last supply day if treatment gap ≥ 90 days, whichever occurred first. The index date was defined as the first treatment initiation for the first treatment cohort and as the second treatment initiation for the second treatment cohort.

    Measured: Up to approximately 10 years

  2. Number of Patients per PDC Category

    PDC was defined as the number of days of medication covered divided by the number of calendar days during the study period. The study period spanned from index date to the next line of therapy initiation (switch), HSCT, initiation of a CML-related chemotherapy for AP/BC (day prior to HSCT/CML chemotherapy) or last supply day if treatment gap ≥ 90 days, whichever occurred first. The index date was defined as the first treatment initiation for the first treatment cohort and as the second treatment initiation for the second treatment cohort.

    PDC categories included:

    • PDC (%) ≤ 50%
    • PDC (%) ≤ 70%
    • PDC (%) ≥ 80%
    • PDC (%) > 90%

    Measured: Up to approximately 10 years

  3. Time to Treatment Discontinuation

    Measured: Up to approximately 10 years

  4. Time to Treatment Switch

    Measured: Up to approximately 10 years

  5. Time to First Treatment Interruption

    Measured: Up to approximately 10 years

  6. Time to First Dose Reduction

    Measured: Up to approximately 10 years

  7. Rate of Treatment Discontinuation

    Measured: Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and years 2, 3, 4

  8. Rate of Treatment Switching

    Measured: Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and years 2, 3, 4

  9. Rate of Treatment Interruption

    Measured: Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and years 2, 3, 4

  10. Rate of Dose Reduction

    Measured: Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and years 2, 3, 4

  11. Number of Patients With Non-optimal Treatment (NOPT)

    Three categories of NOPT were defined:

    1. Base Case: NOPT was defined as 1) treatment switch ≤ 6 months post-index, 2) temporary treatment interruption/dose reduction ≤6 months post-index followed by treatment switch ≤12 months post-index, or 3) PDC ≤50%.
    2. Sensitivity 1: NOPT was defined as 1) treatment switch ≤ 6 months post-index, 2) temporary treatment interruption/dose reduction ≤6 months post-index followed by treatment switch ≤12 months post-index, or 3) PDC ≤70%.
    3. Sensitivity 2: NOPT was defined as treatment switch ≤ 6 months post-index.

    Index date was defined as the first treatment initiation for the first treatment cohort and as the second treatment initiation for the second treatment cohort.

    Measured: Up to approximately 10 years

  12. Number of Patients With NOPT by First Generation TKI

    Three categories of NOPT were defined:

    1. Base Case: NOPT was defined as 1) treatment switch ≤ 6 months post-index, 2) temporary treatment interruption/dose reduction ≤6 months post-index followed by treatment switch ≤12 months post-index, or 3) PDC ≤50%.
    2. Sensitivity 1: NOPT was defined as 1) treatment switch ≤ 6 months post-index, 2) temporary treatment interruption/dose reduction ≤6 months post-index followed by treatment switch ≤12 months post-index, or 3) PDC ≤70%.
    3. Sensitivity 2: NOPT was defined as treatment switch ≤ 6 months post-index.

    Index date was defined as the first treatment initiation for the first treatment cohort and as the second treatment initiation for the second treatment cohort.

    Measured: Up to approximately 10 years

  13. Number of Patients With NOPT by Second Generation TKI

    Three categories of NOPT were defined:

    1. Base Case: NOPT was defined as 1) treatment switch ≤ 6 months post-index, 2) temporary treatment interruption/dose reduction ≤6 months post-index followed by treatment switch ≤12 months post-index, or 3) PDC ≤50%.
    2. Sensitivity 1: NOPT was defined as 1) treatment switch ≤ 6 months post-index, 2) temporary treatment interruption/dose reduction ≤6 months post-index followed by treatment switch ≤12 months post-index, or 3) PDC ≤70%.
    3. Sensitivity 2: NOPT was defined as treatment switch ≤ 6 months post-index.

    Index date was defined as the first treatment initiation for the first treatment cohort and as the second treatment initiation for the second treatment cohort.

    Measured: Up to approximately 10 years

  14. All-cause Healthcare Resource Utilization (HRU) per Patient per Year in NOPT Patients Compared to Reference Subgroup

    The reference subgroup was defined based on the following treatment adherence and persistence criteria denoting potential indicators of TKI treatment success based on observations from the clinical practice: (1) high treatment adherence (defined as PDC >90%) with no observed treatment discontinuation anytime post-index; or (2) high treatment adherence (defined as PDC >90%) with treatment discontinuation occurring >12 months post-index.

    All-cause HRU included:

    • Inpatient admission
    • Inpatient days
    • Emergency department visits
    • Outpatient visits

    Measured: 2 years

  15. CML-related HRU per Patient per Year in NOPT Patients Compared to Reference Subgroup

    The reference subgroup was defined based on the following treatment adherence and persistence criteria denoting potential indicators of TKI treatment success based on observations from the clinical practice: (1) high treatment adherence (defined as PDC >90%) with no observed treatment discontinuation anytime post-index; or (2) high treatment adherence (defined as PDC >90%) with treatment discontinuation occurring >12 months post-index.

    All-cause HRU included:

    • Inpatient admission
    • Inpatient days
    • Emergency department visits
    • Outpatient visits

    Measured: 2 years

  16. All-cause Direct Healthcare Costs per Patient per Year in NOPT Patients Compared to Reference Subgroup

    The reference subgroup was defined based on the following treatment adherence and persistence criteria denoting potential indicators of TKI treatment success based on observations from the clinical practice: (1) high treatment adherence (defined as PDC >90%) with no observed treatment discontinuation anytime post-index; or (2) high treatment adherence (defined as PDC >90%) with treatment discontinuation occurring >12 months post-index.

    All-cause direct healthcare costs included:

    • Total medical costs
    • Inpatient costs
    • Outpatient costs
    • Emergency department costs

    Measured: 2 years

  17. CML-related Direct Healthcare Costs per Patient per Year in NOPT Patients Compared to Reference Subgroup

    The reference subgroup was defined based on the following treatment adherence and persistence criteria denoting potential indicators of TKI treatment success based on observations from the clinical practice: (1) high treatment adherence (defined as PDC >90%) with no observed treatment discontinuation anytime post-index; or (2) high treatment adherence (defined as PDC >90%) with treatment discontinuation occurring >12 months post-index.

    All-cause direct healthcare costs included:

    • Total medical costs
    • Inpatient costs
    • Outpatient costs
    • Emergency department costs

    Measured: 2 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Nov 2024
  2. Study start23 May 2023
  3. Primary completion30 Nov 2023
  4. Study completion30 Nov 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
2,043 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06692803
Sponsor's protocol ID
CABL001A0US04
Acronym
ABL-2022-03
Status last verified
Nov 2024
First submitted
15 Nov 2024
Last updated
18 Nov 2024
Results posted
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 16 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Nov 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Treatment Patterns (time frame: Up to approximately 10 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Nov 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in