Lower Limb Amputation Below KneeOSANCT06711588
Automatic Prosthetic Foot Stiffness Modulation to Improve Balance
A study testing As-prescribed stiffness, Two categories stiffer than the as-prescribed stiffness and Two categories less stiff than the as-prescribed stiffness in people with Lower Limb Amputation Below Knee, run by Seattle Institute for Biomedical and Clinical Research at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to identify prosthesis stiffness that optimizes balance control in individuals with below knee amputations. The main question this clinical trial will answer is: Is there an optimal stiffness that improves balance control for specific ambulatory activities and users? Participants… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Lower Limb Amputation Below Knee
- What is being tested?
- As-prescribed stiffness, Two categories stiffer than the as-prescribed stiffness and Two categories less stiff than the as-prescribed stiffness
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 21 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 19 Dec 2024to 24 Jul 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Unilateral transtibial (below-knee) amputation
- Been fit with a prosthesis and used it for at least 6 months
- Wear the prosthesis for 4 or more hours on average per day
- Be at least one-year post-amputation
- Able to walk on a treadmill
Who cannot join
- Presence of disorder, pain, or injury other than amputation that interferes with gait
- Current skin irritation or injury on residual limb
- Use of an assistive device for walking (cane, walker, etc.)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
VA Puget Sound Healthcare System
Seattle, Washington, 98108
About this study
Official title: Automatic Activity-Dependent and Phase-Varying Prosthetic Foot Stiffness Modulation to Improve Balance Control in Individuals With Lower-Limb Amputations
The goal of this clinical trial is to identify prosthesis stiffness that optimizes balance control in individuals with below knee amputations. The main question this clinical trial will answer is:
- Is there an optimal stiffness that improves balance control for specific ambulatory activities and users? Participants will wear a novel prosthesis assembled with three prosthetic feet with a range of stiffness levels: each individual's clinically-prescribed foot stiffness and ± two stiffness categories. While wearing the study prostheses, participants will perform nine ambulatory activities of daily living (walking at different speeds, turning, ramp ascent/descent, while carrying a load, and while walking on uneven terrain).
Read the detailed description
Individuals with lower limb amputations are at higher risk of falling compared to able-bodied and other clinical populations and are more likely to sustain life-altering injuries. The higher fall risk is primarily due to the loss of the muscles crossing the ankle, which are critical to maintaining balance control. Prosthetic devices are designed to provide appropriate stiffness for needed stability and support. While research has shown the optimal stiffness to maintain balance varies across ambulatory activities (e.g., straight walking versus turning), most clinically prescribed prosthetic devices are passive and only provide a fixed stiffness level. The one commercially available, powered prosthetic ankle-foot has not been shown to restore balance control. Thus, a prosthetic device that actively adjusts ankle stiffness across different ambulatory activities is critically needed to advance the field and improve balance control for those with lower-limb amputations. The goal of this clinical trial is to identify prosthesis stiffness that optimizes balance control in individuals with below knee amputations as they perform typical ambulatory activities of daily living. By matching the ankle stiffness to the task requirements, we believe we will significantly improve balance control and decrease fall risk for those with lower-limb amputations.
Each participant will be fit with a novel prosthesis that includes a low-profile prosthetic foot whose stiffness category will be determined by their body weight and activity level (standard clinical practice), a prosthetic foot whose stiffness category is two categories stiffer, and another whose stiffness is two categories less stiff. Participants will continue to use their existing prosthetic socket and suspension system, but their pylon length will be adjusted as needed. While wearing the different study prostheses in randomized order, nine ambulatory activities will be performed motion capture laboratory.
- Walking on level ground at self-selected speed.
- Walking on level ground at 15% slower than self-selected speed.
- Walking on level ground at 15% faster than self-selected speed.
- Walking up an 8% slope at self-selected speed.
- Walking down an 8% slope at self-selected speed.
- Walking on level ground at self-selected speed while carrying a 5 kg load in one hand on their prosthetic side.
- Walking on level but uneven terrain at self-selected speed.
- Walking a 2-meter diameter circle at self-selected speed with the prosthetic side on the inside of the circle.
- Walking a 2-meter diameter circle at self-selected speed with the prosthetic side on the outside of the circle.
Ambulatory activities 1 through 6 will be performed on an instrumented treadmill. The load to be carried in activity 6 will be configured as a grocery bag with handles. Activity 7 will be performed on a rocky terrain treadmill. Activities 8 and 9 will be performed overground across five force plates embedded in the laboratory floor while following the outline of a 2-meter diameter circle. Rest breaks during all activities will be provided as needed.
The data from these experiments will be used to calculate the peak-to-peak range of the frontal plane whole-body angular momentum (a measure of balance control). We hypothesize that an optimal user-specific stiffness profile exists that maximizes balance control (i.e., minimizes the peak-to-peak range of frontal plane whole-body angular momentum over the gait cycle) for each ambulatory activity.
- Conditions
- Lower Limb Amputation Below Knee
- Being tested
- As-prescribed stiffness, Two categories stiffer than the as-prescribed stiffness, Two categories less stiff than the as-prescribed stiffness
- Keywords
- lower limb prosthesis, transtibial amputation, below knee amputation, biomechanics, gait
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
As-prescribed stiffnessDevice
A novel prosthesis that includes a low-profile prosthetic foot whose stiffness category is determined by the person's body weight and activity level (standard clinical practice).
Two categories stiffer than the as-prescribed stiffnessDevice
A novel prosthesis that includes a low-profile prosthetic foot whose stiffness category is two categories stiffer than the as-prescribed stiffness.
Two categories less stiff than the as-prescribed stiffnessDevice
A novel prosthesis that includes a low-profile prosthetic foot whose stiffness category is two categories less stiff than the as-prescribed stiffness.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Walking on 0% slope at self-selected speed | Experimental | All participants will walk on a treadmill, in a straight line, on a 0% slope, at their self-selected walking speed determined while walking overground. Receives: Device: As-prescribed stiffness; Device: Two categories stiffer than the as-prescribed stiffness; Device: Two categories less stiff than the as-prescribed stiffness |
| Walking on 0% slope at 15% slower than self-selected speed | Experimental | All participants will walk on a treadmill, in a straight line, on a 0% slope, at a speed that is 15% slower than their self-selected walking speed determined while walking overground. Receives: Device: As-prescribed stiffness; Device: Two categories stiffer than the as-prescribed stiffness; Device: Two categories less stiff than the as-prescribed stiffness |
| Walking on 0% slope at 15% faster than self-selected speed | Experimental | All participants will walk on a treadmill, in a straight line, on a 0% slope, at a speed that is 15% faster than their self-selected walking speed determined while walking overground. Receives: Device: As-prescribed stiffness; Device: Two categories stiffer than the as-prescribed stiffness; Device: Two categories less stiff than the as-prescribed stiffness |
| Walking up an 8% slope at self-selected speed | Experimental | All participants will walk on a treadmill, in a straight line, up an 8% slope, at their self-selected walking speed determined while walking overground up an 8% slope. Receives: Device: As-prescribed stiffness; Device: Two categories stiffer than the as-prescribed stiffness; Device: Two categories less stiff than the as-prescribed stiffness |
| Walking down an 8% slope at self-selected speed | Experimental | All participants will walk on a treadmill, in a straight line, down an 8% slope, at their self-selected walking speed determined while walking overground up an 8% slope. Receives: Device: As-prescribed stiffness; Device: Two categories stiffer than the as-prescribed stiffness; Device: Two categories less stiff than the as-prescribed stiffness |
| Walking on 0% slope at self-selected speed while hand carrying a 5 kg load on their prosthetic side | Experimental | All participants will walk on a treadmill, in a straight line, on a 0% slope, at their self-selected walking speed determined while walking overground, while carrying a 5 kg load in one hand on their prosthetic side. Receives: Device: As-prescribed stiffness; Device: Two categories stiffer than the as-prescribed stiffness; Device: Two categories less stiff than the as-prescribed stiffness |
| Walking on uneven terrain at self-selected speed | Experimental | All participants will walk on an uneven terrain treadmill, in a straight line, on a 0% slope, at their self-selected walking speed determined while walking on the uneven terrain treadmill. Receives: Device: As-prescribed stiffness; Device: Two categories stiffer than the as-prescribed stiffness; Device: Two categories less stiff than the as-prescribed stiffness |
| Walking around a 2-meter diameter circle with the prosthesis on the inside of the circle | Experimental | All participants will walk overground while following the outline of a 2-meter diameter circle, at their self-selected walking speed determined while walking around the circle, with their prosthetic limb on the inside of the circle. Receives: Device: As-prescribed stiffness; Device: Two categories stiffer than the as-prescribed stiffness; Device: Two categories less stiff than the as-prescribed stiffness |
| Walking around a 2-meter diameter circle with the prosthesis on the outside of the circle | Experimental | All participants will walk overground while following the outline of a 2-meter diameter circle, at their self-selected walking speed determined while walking around the circle, with their prosthetic limb on the outside of the circle. Receives: Device: As-prescribed stiffness; Device: Two categories stiffer than the as-prescribed stiffness; Device: Two categories less stiff than the as-prescribed stiffness |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Peak-to-peak range of the frontal plane whole-body angular momentum
Frontal plane whole-body angular momentum is a measure of the extent to which a person will rotate in the frontal plane in the absence of an external force or torque. The peak-to-peak range quantifies how much this metric varies and is used to describe a person's balance.
Measured: During study visit (approximately 3 hours)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Dec 2024
- Study start19 Dec 2024
- Primary completion24 Jul 2026
- Study completion24 Jul 2026
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Lower Limb Amputation Below KneeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 21 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Seattle Institute for Biomedical and Clinical Research
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Glenn Klute, PhD, Principal investigator, US Department of Veterans AffairsRichard Neptune, PhD, Principal investigator, The University of Texas at Austin
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06711588
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1817327
- Other IDs
- 1R01HD111514-01A1
- Acronym
- OSA
- Status last verified
- Aug 2026
- First submitted
- 24 Nov 2024
- Last updated
- 7 Aug 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: De-identified data sets of all IPD collected throughout the trial will be made available, in machine-readable format, on the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Data and Specimen Hub (DASH). The de-identification procedures will follow 164.514(a) of the HIPAA Privacy Rule.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Aug 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Automatic Activity-Dependent and Phase-Varying Prosthetic Foot Stiffness Modulation to Improve Balance Control in Individuals With Lower-Limb Amputations
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06711588
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- OSA / 1817327
- Conditions
- Lower Limb Amputation Below Knee
- Keywords
- lower limb prosthesis, transtibial amputation, below knee amputation, biomechanics, gait
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 21 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Seattle Institute for Biomedical and Clinical ResearchUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
- Study start
- 19 Dec 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 24 Jul 2026 (actual)
- Study completion
- 24 Jul 2026 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Dec 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this clinical trial is to identify prosthesis stiffness that optimizes balance control in individuals with below knee amputations. The main question this clinical trial will answer is:
- Is there an optimal stiffness that improves balance control for specific ambulatory activities and users? Participants will wear a novel prosthesis assembled with three prosthetic feet with a range of stiffness levels: each individual's clinically-prescribed foot stiffness and ± two stiffness categories. While wearing the study prostheses, participants will perform nine ambulatory activities of daily living (walking at different speeds, turning, ramp ascent/descent, while carrying a load, and while walking on uneven terrain).
Detailed description
Individuals with lower limb amputations are at higher risk of falling compared to able-bodied and other clinical populations and are more likely to sustain life-altering injuries. The higher fall risk is primarily due to the loss of the muscles crossing the ankle, which are critical to maintaining balance control. Prosthetic devices are designed to provide appropriate stiffness for needed stability and support. While research has shown the optimal stiffness to maintain balance varies across ambulatory activities (e.g., straight walking versus turning), most clinically prescribed prosthetic devices are passive and only provide a fixed stiffness level. The one commercially available, powered prosthetic ankle-foot has not been shown to restore balance control. Thus, a prosthetic device that actively adjusts ankle stiffness across different ambulatory activities is critically needed to advance the field and improve balance control for those with lower-limb amputations. The goal of this clinical trial is to identify prosthesis stiffness that optimizes balance control in individuals with below knee amputations as they perform typical ambulatory activities of daily living. By matching the ankle stiffness to the task requirements, we believe we will significantly improve balance control and decrease fall risk for those with lower-limb amputations.
Each participant will be fit with a novel prosthesis that includes a low-profile prosthetic foot whose stiffness category will be determined by their body weight and activity level (standard clinical practice), a prosthetic foot whose stiffness category is two categories stiffer, and another whose stiffness is two categories less stiff. Participants will continue to use their existing prosthetic socket and suspension system, but their pylon length will be adjusted as needed. While wearing the different study prostheses in randomized order, nine ambulatory activities will be performed motion capture laboratory.
- Walking on level ground at self-selected speed.
- Walking on level ground at 15% slower than self-selected speed.
- Walking on level ground at 15% faster than self-selected speed.
- Walking up an 8% slope at self-selected speed.
- Walking down an 8% slope at self-selected speed.
- Walking on level ground at self-selected speed while carrying a 5 kg load in one hand on their prosthetic side.
- Walking on level but uneven terrain at self-selected speed.
- Walking a 2-meter diameter circle at self-selected speed with the prosthetic side on the inside of the circle.
- Walking a 2-meter diameter circle at self-selected speed with the prosthetic side on the outside of the circle.
Ambulatory activities 1 through 6 will be performed on an instrumented treadmill. The load to be carried in activity 6 will be configured as a grocery bag with handles. Activity 7 will be performed on a rocky terrain treadmill. Activities 8 and 9 will be performed overground across five force plates embedded in the laboratory floor while following the outline of a 2-meter diameter circle. Rest breaks during all activities will be provided as needed.
The data from these experiments will be used to calculate the peak-to-peak range of the frontal plane whole-body angular momentum (a measure of balance control). We hypothesize that an optimal user-specific stiffness profile exists that maximizes balance control (i.e., minimizes the peak-to-peak range of frontal plane whole-body angular momentum over the gait cycle) for each ambulatory activity.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 9
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Walking on 0% slope at self-selected speed | Experimental | Device: As-prescribed stiffness, Device: Two categories stiffer than the as-prescribed stiffness, Device: Two categories less stiff than the as-prescribed stiffnessAll participants will walk on a treadmill, in a straight line, on a 0% slope, at their self-selected walking speed determined while walking overground. |
| Walking on 0% slope at 15% slower than self-selected speed | Experimental | Device: As-prescribed stiffness, Device: Two categories stiffer than the as-prescribed stiffness, Device: Two categories less stiff than the as-prescribed stiffnessAll participants will walk on a treadmill, in a straight line, on a 0% slope, at a speed that is 15% slower than their self-selected walking speed determined while walking overground. |
| Walking on 0% slope at 15% faster than self-selected speed | Experimental | Device: As-prescribed stiffness, Device: Two categories stiffer than the as-prescribed stiffness, Device: Two categories less stiff than the as-prescribed stiffnessAll participants will walk on a treadmill, in a straight line, on a 0% slope, at a speed that is 15% faster than their self-selected walking speed determined while walking overground. |
| Walking up an 8% slope at self-selected speed | Experimental | Device: As-prescribed stiffness, Device: Two categories stiffer than the as-prescribed stiffness, Device: Two categories less stiff than the as-prescribed stiffnessAll participants will walk on a treadmill, in a straight line, up an 8% slope, at their self-selected walking speed determined while walking overground up an 8% slope. |
| Walking down an 8% slope at self-selected speed | Experimental | Device: As-prescribed stiffness, Device: Two categories stiffer than the as-prescribed stiffness, Device: Two categories less stiff than the as-prescribed stiffnessAll participants will walk on a treadmill, in a straight line, down an 8% slope, at their self-selected walking speed determined while walking overground up an 8% slope. |
| Walking on 0% slope at self-selected speed while hand carrying a 5 kg load on their prosthetic side | Experimental | Device: As-prescribed stiffness, Device: Two categories stiffer than the as-prescribed stiffness, Device: Two categories less stiff than the as-prescribed stiffnessAll participants will walk on a treadmill, in a straight line, on a 0% slope, at their self-selected walking speed determined while walking overground, while carrying a 5 kg load in one hand on their prosthetic side. |
| Walking on uneven terrain at self-selected speed | Experimental | Device: As-prescribed stiffness, Device: Two categories stiffer than the as-prescribed stiffness, Device: Two categories less stiff than the as-prescribed stiffnessAll participants will walk on an uneven terrain treadmill, in a straight line, on a 0% slope, at their self-selected walking speed determined while walking on the uneven terrain treadmill. |
| Walking around a 2-meter diameter circle with the prosthesis on the inside of the circle | Experimental | Device: As-prescribed stiffness, Device: Two categories stiffer than the as-prescribed stiffness, Device: Two categories less stiff than the as-prescribed stiffnessAll participants will walk overground while following the outline of a 2-meter diameter circle, at their self-selected walking speed determined while walking around the circle, with their prosthetic limb on the inside of the circle. |
| Walking around a 2-meter diameter circle with the prosthesis on the outside of the circle | Experimental | Device: As-prescribed stiffness, Device: Two categories stiffer than the as-prescribed stiffness, Device: Two categories less stiff than the as-prescribed stiffnessAll participants will walk overground while following the outline of a 2-meter diameter circle, at their self-selected walking speed determined while walking around the circle, with their prosthetic limb on the outside of the circle. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Unilateral transtibial (below-knee) amputation
- Been fit with a prosthesis and used it for at least 6 months
- Wear the prosthesis for 4 or more hours on average per day
- Be at least one-year post-amputation
- Able to walk on a treadmill
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Presence of disorder, pain, or injury other than amputation that interferes with gait
- Current skin irritation or injury on residual limb
- Use of an assistive device for walking (cane, walker, etc.)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| As-prescribed stiffnessA novel prosthesis that includes a low-profile prosthetic foot whose stiffness category is determined by the person's body weight and activity level (standard clinical practice). | Device | Walking around a 2-meter diameter circle with the prosthesis on the inside of the circle, Walking around a 2-meter diameter circle with the prosthesis on the outside of the circle, Walking down an 8% slope at self-selected speed, Walking on 0% slope at 15% faster than self-selected speed, Walking on 0% slope at 15% slower than self-selected speed, Walking on 0% slope at self-selected speed, Walking on 0% slope at self-selected speed while hand carrying a 5 kg load on their prosthetic side, Walking on uneven terrain at self-selected speed, Walking up an 8% slope at self-selected speed |
| Two categories stiffer than the as-prescribed stiffnessA novel prosthesis that includes a low-profile prosthetic foot whose stiffness category is two categories stiffer than the as-prescribed stiffness. | Device | Walking around a 2-meter diameter circle with the prosthesis on the inside of the circle, Walking around a 2-meter diameter circle with the prosthesis on the outside of the circle, Walking down an 8% slope at self-selected speed, Walking on 0% slope at 15% faster than self-selected speed, Walking on 0% slope at 15% slower than self-selected speed, Walking on 0% slope at self-selected speed, Walking on 0% slope at self-selected speed while hand carrying a 5 kg load on their prosthetic side, Walking on uneven terrain at self-selected speed, Walking up an 8% slope at self-selected speed |
| Two categories less stiff than the as-prescribed stiffnessA novel prosthesis that includes a low-profile prosthetic foot whose stiffness category is two categories less stiff than the as-prescribed stiffness. | Device | Walking around a 2-meter diameter circle with the prosthesis on the inside of the circle, Walking around a 2-meter diameter circle with the prosthesis on the outside of the circle, Walking down an 8% slope at self-selected speed, Walking on 0% slope at 15% faster than self-selected speed, Walking on 0% slope at 15% slower than self-selected speed, Walking on 0% slope at self-selected speed, Walking on 0% slope at self-selected speed while hand carrying a 5 kg load on their prosthetic side, Walking on uneven terrain at self-selected speed, Walking up an 8% slope at self-selected speed |
Primary outcome
Peak-to-peak range of the frontal plane whole-body angular momentum
Time frame: During study visit (approximately 3 hours)
Frontal plane whole-body angular momentum is a measure of the extent to which a person will rotate in the frontal plane in the absence of an external force or torque. The peak-to-peak range quantifies how much this metric varies and is used to describe a person's balance.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Aug 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. De-identified data sets of all IPD collected throughout the trial will be made available, in machine-readable format, on the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Data and Specimen Hub (DASH). The de-identification procedures will follow 164.514(a) of the HIPAA Privacy Rule.
Related trials for Lower Limb Amputation Below Knee
Recruiting
TENS for Restoring Somatotopic Sensory Feedback in Lower Limb Amputees and Improving Phantom Limb Perception
Lower Limb Amputation Above Knee, Lower Limb Amputation Below Knee
Not yet recruiting
Determining the Effects of Ischemic Conditioning and Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation on Overall Function After Lower Limb Amputation
Lower Limb Amputation Above Knee, Below Knee Amputation
Recruiting
REsistance and LOADing Exercise for Bone Health
Amputation of Lower Limb Below Knee, Amputation, Traumatic
Not yet recruiting
Automatic Prosthetic Foot Stiffness Modulation to Improve Balance in the Real World
Lower Limb Amputation Below Knee
Active, not recruiting
Improving Prosthetic Provision in Rural Communities: Limb Scanning With Caregiver Assistance
Lower Extremity Amputation
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Glenn Klute, PhD principal investigator
US Department of Veterans Affairs
Richard Neptune, PhD principal investigator
The University of Texas at Austin
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing As-prescribed stiffness, Two categories stiffer than the as-prescribed stiffness and Two categories less stiff than the as-prescribed stiffness in people with Lower Limb Amputation Below Knee, run by Seattle Institute for Biomedical and Clinical Research at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Peak-to-peak range of the frontal plane whole-body angular momentum (time frame: During study visit (approximately 3 hours)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Aug 2026.