Efficacy, SelfNCT06722001
Comparing of Using Interactive E-books and Traditional Education Methods for Nursing Students and Nursing Staff
A study testing The "Brief insomnia intervention" interactive e-book and traditional paper handout in people with Efficacy, Self and Satisfaction, Personal, run by Taipei Medical University.
Trial summary
Cancer-related comorbidities are a major focus of care for medical staff, especially the incidence of "insomnia" in cancer patients should not be underestimated, and the treatment of cancer-related insomnia by clinical medical staff is often limited to verbal instructions and suggestions, lacking routine and a… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Efficacy, Self, Satisfaction, Personal
- What is being tested?
- The "Brief insomnia intervention" interactive e-book and traditional paper handout
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 180 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 30 Dec 2024to 28 Feb 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 to 65 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Nursing students older than 20 years old.
- Clinical nurses worked in the hospital more than three months.
Who cannot join
- cognitive disabilities
- incomplete behavioral ability
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
About this study
Official title: Comparing the Effectiveness of Brief Behavioral Treatment of Insomnia(BBTI) for Nursing Students and Nursing Staff Using Interactive E-books and Traditional Education Methods - a Randomized Clinical Trial
Cancer-related comorbidities are a major focus of care for medical staff, especially the incidence of "insomnia" in cancer patients should not be underestimated, and the treatment of cancer-related insomnia by clinical medical staff is often limited to verbal instructions and suggestions, lacking routine and a systematic process. Although "Cognitive behavioral treatment for insomnia (CBTI)" is widely used, due to the limitation of personnel and high time cost, later generations improved "Brief Behavioral Treatment of Insomnia (BBTI)", which not only broadens the clinical application but also increases the patient's willingness to cooperate.
In recent years, the integration of technology into teaching has become a trend. Among them, interactive e-books are widely used. It not only enhances users' learning motivation and interest but also is effective in building practical confidence. It can also customize course content according to different needs.
The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of using interactive e-book teaching and traditional teaching methods to learn Brief Behavioral Treatment of Insomnia. The object is aimed at nursing students and clinical nurses. An experimental research design is adopted. A total of 165~180 clinical nurses and university nursing students will be pre-selected and randomly assigned to the control group or the experimental group. The control group learned through paper health education leaflets and traditional oral explanations; the experimental group used interactive e-books to intervene in learning Brief Behavioral Treatment of Insomnia, the subjects needed to fill out the pre-test and post-test questionnaires before and after the experiment to compare the difference in the learning effects of the two groups of subjects, and expect that the group using interactive e-book will have better learning effects and course satisfaction.
Read the detailed description
Cancer-related comorbidities are a major focus of care for medical staff, especially the incidence of "insomnia" in cancer patients should not be underestimated, and the treatment of cancer-related insomnia by clinical medical staff is often limited to verbal instructions and suggestions, lacking routine and a systematic process. Although "Cognitive behavioral treatment for insomnia (CBTI)" is widely used, due to the limitation of personnel and high time cost, later generations improved "Brief Behavioral Treatment of Insomnia (BBTI)", which not only broadens the clinical application but also increases the patient's willingness to cooperate.
In recent years, the integration of technology into teaching has become a trend. Among them, interactive e-books are widely used. It not only enhances users' learning motivation and interest but also is effective in building practical confidence. It can also customize course content according to different needs.
The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of using interactive e-book teaching and traditional teaching methods to learn Brief Behavioral Treatment of Insomnia (BBTI). The object is aimed at nursing students and clinical nurses. An experimental research design is adopted. A total of 165~180 clinical nurses and university nursing students will be pre-selected and randomly assigned to the control group or the experimental group. The control group learned through paper health education leaflets and traditional oral explanations; the experimental group used interactive e-books to intervene in learning Brief Behavioral Treatment of Insomnia (BBTI), the subjects needed to fill out the pre-test and post-test questionnaires before and after the experiment to compare the difference in the learning effects of the two groups of subjects, and expect that the group using interactive e-book will have better learning effects and course satisfaction.
- Conditions
- Efficacy, Self, Satisfaction, Personal
- Being tested
- The "Brief insomnia intervention" interactive e-book, traditional paper handout
- Keywords
- Brief Behavioral Treatment of Insomnia, e-book, Insomnia treatment
- Medical subject headings
- Personal Satisfaction
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
The "Brief insomnia intervention" interactive e-bookBehavioural
The control group learned through paper health education leaflets and traditional oral explanations; the experimental group used interactive e-books to intervene in learning Brief Behavioral Treatment of Insomnia.
traditional paper handoutBehavioural
The control group learned through paper health education leaflets and traditional oral explanations; the experimental group used interactive e-books to intervene in learning Brief Behavioral Treatment of Insomnia.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Traditional group | Active comparator | The traditional group members will obtain traditional paper leaflets and oral health education. Receives: Behavioral: traditional paper handout |
| "Brief insomnia intervention" group | Experimental | The "Brief insomnia intervention" group will study the interactive e-book. Receives: Behavioral: The "Brief insomnia intervention" interactive e-book |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Cognition knowledge scale
learning Cognition knowledge outcomes from Brief Behavioral Treatment of Insomnia. higher score higher cognition knoeledge.
Measured: change in learning outcomes between baseline and 1 week
Confidence scale
learning Confidence outcomes from Brief Behavioral Treatment of Insomnia. higher score higher confidence.
Measured: change in learning outcomes between baseline and 1 week.
Satisfied from learning
learning Satisfaction from Brief Behavioral Treatment of Insomnia. higher score higher satisfaction.
Measured: change in learning outcomes between baseline and 1 week.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Dec 2024
- Study start30 Dec 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completion28 Feb 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion28 Feb 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Efficacy, SelfStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 180 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Taipei Medical University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Tsai-Wei Huang, Taipei Medical University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06722001
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- TMU_ebook
- Status last verified
- Dec 2024
- First submitted
- 22 Sep 2023
- Last updated
- 9 Dec 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Dec 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparing the Effectiveness of Brief Behavioral Treatment of Insomnia(BBTI) for Nursing Students and Nursing Staff Using Interactive E-books and Traditional Education Methods - a Randomized Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06722001
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TMU_ebook
- Conditions
- Efficacy, Self, Satisfaction, Personal
- Keywords
- Brief Behavioral Treatment of Insomnia, e-book, Insomnia treatment
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 180 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Taipei Medical UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 30 Dec 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 28 Feb 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 28 Feb 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 9 Dec 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Cancer-related comorbidities are a major focus of care for medical staff, especially the incidence of "insomnia" in cancer patients should not be underestimated, and the treatment of cancer-related insomnia by clinical medical staff is often limited to verbal instructions and suggestions, lacking routine and a systematic process. Although "Cognitive behavioral treatment for insomnia (CBTI)" is widely used, due to the limitation of personnel and high time cost, later generations improved "Brief Behavioral Treatment of Insomnia (BBTI)", which not only broadens the clinical application but also increases the patient's willingness to cooperate.
In recent years, the integration of technology into teaching has become a trend. Among them, interactive e-books are widely used. It not only enhances users' learning motivation and interest but also is effective in building practical confidence. It can also customize course content according to different needs.
The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of using interactive e-book teaching and traditional teaching methods to learn Brief Behavioral Treatment of Insomnia. The object is aimed at nursing students and clinical nurses. An experimental research design is adopted. A total of 165~180 clinical nurses and university nursing students will be pre-selected and randomly assigned to the control group or the experimental group. The control group learned through paper health education leaflets and traditional oral explanations; the experimental group used interactive e-books to intervene in learning Brief Behavioral Treatment of Insomnia, the subjects needed to fill out the pre-test and post-test questionnaires before and after the experiment to compare the difference in the learning effects of the two groups of subjects, and expect that the group using interactive e-book will have better learning effects and course satisfaction.
Detailed description
Cancer-related comorbidities are a major focus of care for medical staff, especially the incidence of "insomnia" in cancer patients should not be underestimated, and the treatment of cancer-related insomnia by clinical medical staff is often limited to verbal instructions and suggestions, lacking routine and a systematic process. Although "Cognitive behavioral treatment for insomnia (CBTI)" is widely used, due to the limitation of personnel and high time cost, later generations improved "Brief Behavioral Treatment of Insomnia (BBTI)", which not only broadens the clinical application but also increases the patient's willingness to cooperate.
In recent years, the integration of technology into teaching has become a trend. Among them, interactive e-books are widely used. It not only enhances users' learning motivation and interest but also is effective in building practical confidence. It can also customize course content according to different needs.
The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of using interactive e-book teaching and traditional teaching methods to learn Brief Behavioral Treatment of Insomnia (BBTI). The object is aimed at nursing students and clinical nurses. An experimental research design is adopted. A total of 165~180 clinical nurses and university nursing students will be pre-selected and randomly assigned to the control group or the experimental group. The control group learned through paper health education leaflets and traditional oral explanations; the experimental group used interactive e-books to intervene in learning Brief Behavioral Treatment of Insomnia (BBTI), the subjects needed to fill out the pre-test and post-test questionnaires before and after the experiment to compare the difference in the learning effects of the two groups of subjects, and expect that the group using interactive e-book will have better learning effects and course satisfaction.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Traditional group | Active comparator | Behavioral: traditional paper handoutThe traditional group members will obtain traditional paper leaflets and oral health education. |
| "Brief insomnia intervention" group | Experimental | Behavioral: The "Brief insomnia intervention" interactive e-bookThe "Brief insomnia intervention" group will study the interactive e-book. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Nursing students older than 20 years old.
- Clinical nurses worked in the hospital more than three months.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- cognitive disabilities
- incomplete behavioral ability
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| The "Brief insomnia intervention" interactive e-bookThe control group learned through paper health education leaflets and traditional oral explanations; the experimental group used interactive e-books to intervene in learning Brief Behavioral Treatment of Insomnia. | Behavioural | "Brief insomnia intervention" group |
| traditional paper handoutThe control group learned through paper health education leaflets and traditional oral explanations; the experimental group used interactive e-books to intervene in learning Brief Behavioral Treatment of Insomnia. | Behavioural | Traditional group |
Primary outcome
Cognition knowledge scale
Time frame: change in learning outcomes between baseline and 1 week
learning Cognition knowledge outcomes from Brief Behavioral Treatment of Insomnia. higher score higher cognition knoeledge.
Confidence scale
Time frame: change in learning outcomes between baseline and 1 week.
learning Confidence outcomes from Brief Behavioral Treatment of Insomnia. higher score higher confidence.
Satisfied from learning
Time frame: change in learning outcomes between baseline and 1 week.
learning Satisfaction from Brief Behavioral Treatment of Insomnia. higher score higher satisfaction.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Dec 2024.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Efficacy, Self
Active, not recruiting
Improving Student Mental Health Through a Universal Trauma-Informed Intervention
Anxiety Symptoms, Post-traumatic Stress Symptoms
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Inhibition of Aggressive Behavior in Participants With Fragile X Syndrome
Aggressive Behavior in Fragile X Syndome
Recruiting
Dual Tasking Training to Enhance Self-Efficacy in Individuals With Parkinson's Disease
Parkinson´s Disease
Active, not recruiting
Online Written Imagery Rescripting for Shame and Negative Self-Cognitions in Malaysian Adults With Childhood Emotional Neglect
Shame, Childhood Emotional Neglect
Active, not recruiting
Improving Emotional Wellbeing of University Students: Emotion Regulation
Emotion Regulation
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing The "Brief insomnia intervention" interactive e-book and traditional paper handout in people with Efficacy, Self and Satisfaction, Personal, run by Taipei Medical University.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Dec 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Tsai-Wei Professor Huang (+886227361661, tsaiwei@tmu.edu.tw), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Cognition knowledge scale (time frame: change in learning outcomes between baseline and 1 week). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Dec 2024.