AzTrials
AzTrials

Peri-Implantitis and Peri-implant MucositisNCT06737328

SPiT-frequency I_Peri-implant Mucositis

A study testing Submocosal instrumentation using a ultrasonic device (PEEK). Submucosal cleaning in people with Peri-Implantitis and Peri-implant Mucositis, run by University of Oslo at 1 site in Norway.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is an interventional clinical study on the peri-implant treatment necessary to improve the clinical conditions surrounding dental implants registered with peri-implant inflammation. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 years and older
What is being tested?
Submocosal instrumentation using a ultrasonic device (PEEK). Submucosal cleaning
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteNorway
Study dates
1 Jan 2025to 19 Jan 2028
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Subject must be ≥ 20 years, diagnosed with peri-implant mucositis as defined by the World Workshop 2017 criteria (Berglundh et al., 2018) at an adequate (<0.5mm) bone level Peri-implant mucositis: Bleeding after gentle probing at an implant and no radiographic bone loss)

Who cannot join

  • Previous radiotherapy in the affected area, current use of chemotherapy, systemic long-term corticosteroid treatment.
  • No pregnant or nursing subjects.
  • > class 2 according to the ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) physical status classification.
  • HIV positive or other disease severely affecting the immune system
  • If examiners/operators agree the placement of the implant (angle, position, proximity to adjacent implant or tooth) or suprastructure was suboptimal and considered to play a major role in the development of inflammation.
  • Anatomical abnormalities.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Odd Carsten Koldsland, Ph.D, contact

+47 93098618

oddcko@odont.uio.no

Anders Verket, Ph.D contact

004793667661

anderver@odont.uio.no

Norway1 site
  • Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo

    Oslo, 0455

    Odd Carsten Koldsland, Ph.D, 004793098618, oddcko@odont.uio.no

    Anders Verket, Ph.D, 004793667661, anderver@odont.uio.no

Other trials in Norway

About this study

This is an interventional clinical study on the peri-implant treatment necessary to improve the clinical conditions surrounding dental implants registered with peri-implant inflammation. The focus of this double-armed, examiner blinded, controlled, randomized clinical trial is to examine the effect of short-term increased frequency of a SPiT (supportive peri-implant treatment) protocol on implants diagnosed with peri-implant mucositis.

The study is a part of a project assessing the frequency of supportive peri-implant therapy. The current is on treatment of peri-implant mucositis (inflammation and no attachment loss at the implants) and secondary prevention of peri-implant mucositis. The other study is a RCT on non-surgical treatment of peri-implantitis (inflammation and exposed implant surface) (REK 790240). Exposure of rough surface may dramatically change the frequency of maintenance needed to improve the inflammatory condition. Thus, a segregation between adequate and low bone level at the implant is necessary.

Subjects with more than one implant and both diagnoses, may be enrolled in both studies, following the frequency of treatment randomized in the peri-implant mucositis study.

Read the detailed description

At the screening visit, the following tests and examination will be carried out to screen eligible subjects and provide baseline information for those patients that meet the study criteria:

  • Anamnestic information as described in the regular electronic dental journal at the Faculty of Dentistry is collected
  • Assessment of clinical registrations; suppuration, plaque, gingival bleeding, PPD, Bleeding index score and presence of keratinized mucosa
  • Assessment of existing radiographs to ensure the subject and implants are eligible according to inclusion criteria
  • Written and oral information on the study will be given
  • Thorough information and instruction in plaque control with tools deemed appropriate by the operator
  • Information about the study is given orally and written together with informed consent sheet

Visit 1 Baseline Signed inform consent is collected

An experienced, calibrated and board certified specialist in periodontology ("Examiner") performs the following clinical registrations at six sites (mesiobuccal, buccal, distobuccal, mesiolingual, lingual, distolingual) of the included implants:

Plaque: the presence or absence recognized by running a probe across the marginal surface of the implant (Mombelli et al. 1987). If plaque is present at the implants to be included, oral hygiene instructions are repeated and Baseline examination is rescheduled PICF (peri implant cravicular fluid): Peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF) will be collected from one site per implant, at the site with the most severe lesion at the baseline Suppuration: the presence or absence after light pressure against gingiva/mucosa or following gentle probing of the peri-implant pocket.

Mucosal bleeding: registered according to the Modified Sulcus Bleeding Index (mBI) (Mombelli et al. 1987).

PPD: recorded with a pressure- sensitive probe (20 g) (University of North Carolina probe, Aesculap, Braun, Tuttlingen, Germany).

Bleeding index score: measured at the implants after probing at six sites, and graded (0-3):

0 = no bleeding,

  1. = spot bleeding,
  2. = line bleeding
  3. = profound bleeding within 30 seconds after measurement of PPD. Presence of keratinized mucosa: registered at the mid buccal site as "adequate" ≥2 mm, "inadequate" <2 mm (Moraschini et al. 2017).

Buccal recession; the distance from a fixed point - suprastructure/abutment connection to the mucosal margin in mm Saliva samples; Stimulated saliva will be collected for 5 min in sterile ice-chilled tubes while chewing on Parafilm.

Immediately after collection, volume of collected saliva will be recorded to determine salivary flow, while pH will be measured using a hand-held pH electrode or pH strips. Buffer capacity will be determined by adding 5 mM HCl in sample of the collect saliva in 3:1 ratio and then measuring the pH with a hand-held pH electrode or pH strips. Remaining saliva will be centrifuged at 7500 × g at 4°C for 10 min and stored in -80°C up to two months prior to further analysis. Total protein content in saliva will be measured using Pierce BCA protein assay, while calcium content will be determined with atomic absorption spectroscopy. Salivary antioxidant activity will be measured using ABTS assay. For these assays, the saliva samples will be thawed immediately prior to analysis and all samples will be discarded immediately after the assay is completed (edited 21.08.23) The following procedures will be performed by "the Operator" Radiographs of the implants showing clear projections of the implant threads at the mesial and distal surfaces will be taken using standard Eggens holders

All included implants receive the following treatment:

Repeated oral hygiene instruction if needed Submucosal instrumentation with ultrasonic device with a PEEK tip followed by copious irrigation with sterile saline Supramucosal polishing using polishing paste and rubber cup Following treatment, if local anesthesia was not applied, the subjects will be asked to grade the level of pain experienced on a 10 cm visual analogue scale (VAS).

The Examiner leaves the room prior to randomization performed by the Operator by opening a concealed envelope stating "test" or "control". Each subject may have more than one implant included in the study. All the implants will be scheduled for the same frequency of SPiT

3-, 6- and 9 weeks following baseline Appointments scheduled for High frequency SPiT implants only. At these time points, all implants are assessed by the Operator (non-blinded examination) and receive supramucosal polishing, submucosal instrumentation as described above and OHI- if necessary VAS scales are registered

12 weeks (3 months) following baseline At this time point, all implants are clinically examined by a blinded Examiner and receive supramucosal polishing as well as submucosal instrumentation and OHI as described above VAS scales are registered

16 weeks (4 months) following baseline Appointments scheduled for High frequency SPiT implants only. At this time points, all implants are assessed by the Operator and receive supramucosal polishing, submucosal instrumentation as described above and OHI- if necessary VAS scales are registered

24 weeks (6 months) following baseline At this time point, all implants are clinically examined by a blinded Examiner and receive supramucosal polishing as well as submucosal instrumentation and OHI as described above by the Operator VAS scales are registered

36 weeks (9 months) following baseline At this time point, all implants are clinically examined by a blinded Examiner and receive supramucosal polishing as well as submucosal instrumentation and OHI as described above by the Operator VAS scales are registered Radiographs are taken according to the baseline examination Referring dentist/dental hygienist (if any) is given written information about the treatment performed and the result, and suggested routines of follow-up is suggested

Being tested
Submocosal instrumentation using a ultrasonic device (PEEK). Submucosal cleaning
Keywords
Peri-implant mucositis, Supportive peri-implant treatment, Frequency
Medical subject headings
Peri-Implantitis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Submocosal instrumentation using a ultrasonic device (PEEK). Submucosal cleaningProcedure or surgery

    The treatment under study is professional non-surgical, submucosal debridement with ultrasonic instruments with PolyEther Ether Ketone (PEEK) tip followed by copious irrigation with sterile saline

Study groups in NCT06737328
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Test. Increased treatment frequencyExperimentalSubmucosal instrumentation will be performed at baseline, 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 9 weeks, 12 weeks, 16 weeks, 24 weeks and 36 weeks.
Receives: Procedure: Submocosal instrumentation using a ultrasonic device (PEEK). Submucosal cleaning
Control. Conventional frequencyActive comparatorSubmucosal instrumentation will be performed at baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks and 36 weeks
Receives: Procedure: Submocosal instrumentation using a ultrasonic device (PEEK). Submucosal cleaning

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Peri-implant inflammation

    To assess the proportion of implants without signs of inflammation (Inflammation is defined as; Bleeding on Probing (BoP) and/or suppuration)

    Measured: From baseline to 9 months

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Improvement of inflammation severity

    Bleeding index (BI) 3, 2, 1, 0 (Roos-Jansåker et al., 2007)

    Measured: From baseline to 9 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Dec 2024
  2. Study start1 Jan 2025 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion19 Jan 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completion19 Jan 2028 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
60 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06737328
Sponsor's protocol ID
SPiT-frequency I_Peri-implant
Other IDs
REK790097
Status last verified
Dec 2024
First submitted
25 Nov 2024
Last updated
17 Dec 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: IPD used in the results publication

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Submocosal instrumentation using a ultrasonic device (PEEK). Submucosal cleaning in people with Peri-Implantitis and Peri-implant Mucositis, run by University of Oslo at 1 site in Norway.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Dec 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Norway. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Odd Carsten Koldsland, Ph.D, (+47 93098618, oddcko@odont.uio.no), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Peri-implant inflammation (time frame: From baseline to 9 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Dec 2024.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in