Peri-Implantitis and Peri-implant MucositisNCT06737328
SPiT-frequency I_Peri-implant Mucositis
A study testing Submocosal instrumentation using a ultrasonic device (PEEK). Submucosal cleaning in people with Peri-Implantitis and Peri-implant Mucositis, run by University of Oslo at 1 site in Norway.
Trial summary
This is an interventional clinical study on the peri-implant treatment necessary to improve the clinical conditions surrounding dental implants registered with peri-implant inflammation. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Peri-Implantitis and Peri-implant Mucositis
- What is being tested?
- Submocosal instrumentation using a ultrasonic device (PEEK). Submucosal cleaning
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteNorway
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2025to 19 Jan 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subject must be ≥ 20 years, diagnosed with peri-implant mucositis as defined by the World Workshop 2017 criteria (Berglundh et al., 2018) at an adequate (<0.5mm) bone level Peri-implant mucositis: Bleeding after gentle probing at an implant and no radiographic bone loss)
Who cannot join
- Previous radiotherapy in the affected area, current use of chemotherapy, systemic long-term corticosteroid treatment.
- No pregnant or nursing subjects.
- > class 2 according to the ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) physical status classification.
- HIV positive or other disease severely affecting the immune system
- If examiners/operators agree the placement of the implant (angle, position, proximity to adjacent implant or tooth) or suprastructure was suboptimal and considered to play a major role in the development of inflammation.
- Anatomical abnormalities.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Norway1 site
Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo
Oslo, 0455
Odd Carsten Koldsland, Ph.D, 004793098618, oddcko@odont.uio.no
Anders Verket, Ph.D, 004793667661, anderver@odont.uio.no
About this study
This is an interventional clinical study on the peri-implant treatment necessary to improve the clinical conditions surrounding dental implants registered with peri-implant inflammation. The focus of this double-armed, examiner blinded, controlled, randomized clinical trial is to examine the effect of short-term increased frequency of a SPiT (supportive peri-implant treatment) protocol on implants diagnosed with peri-implant mucositis.
The study is a part of a project assessing the frequency of supportive peri-implant therapy. The current is on treatment of peri-implant mucositis (inflammation and no attachment loss at the implants) and secondary prevention of peri-implant mucositis. The other study is a RCT on non-surgical treatment of peri-implantitis (inflammation and exposed implant surface) (REK 790240). Exposure of rough surface may dramatically change the frequency of maintenance needed to improve the inflammatory condition. Thus, a segregation between adequate and low bone level at the implant is necessary.
Subjects with more than one implant and both diagnoses, may be enrolled in both studies, following the frequency of treatment randomized in the peri-implant mucositis study.
Read the detailed description
At the screening visit, the following tests and examination will be carried out to screen eligible subjects and provide baseline information for those patients that meet the study criteria:
- Anamnestic information as described in the regular electronic dental journal at the Faculty of Dentistry is collected
- Assessment of clinical registrations; suppuration, plaque, gingival bleeding, PPD, Bleeding index score and presence of keratinized mucosa
- Assessment of existing radiographs to ensure the subject and implants are eligible according to inclusion criteria
- Written and oral information on the study will be given
- Thorough information and instruction in plaque control with tools deemed appropriate by the operator
- Information about the study is given orally and written together with informed consent sheet
Visit 1 Baseline Signed inform consent is collected
An experienced, calibrated and board certified specialist in periodontology ("Examiner") performs the following clinical registrations at six sites (mesiobuccal, buccal, distobuccal, mesiolingual, lingual, distolingual) of the included implants:
Plaque: the presence or absence recognized by running a probe across the marginal surface of the implant (Mombelli et al. 1987). If plaque is present at the implants to be included, oral hygiene instructions are repeated and Baseline examination is rescheduled PICF (peri implant cravicular fluid): Peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF) will be collected from one site per implant, at the site with the most severe lesion at the baseline Suppuration: the presence or absence after light pressure against gingiva/mucosa or following gentle probing of the peri-implant pocket.
Mucosal bleeding: registered according to the Modified Sulcus Bleeding Index (mBI) (Mombelli et al. 1987).
PPD: recorded with a pressure- sensitive probe (20 g) (University of North Carolina probe, Aesculap, Braun, Tuttlingen, Germany).
Bleeding index score: measured at the implants after probing at six sites, and graded (0-3):
0 = no bleeding,
- = spot bleeding,
- = line bleeding
- = profound bleeding within 30 seconds after measurement of PPD. Presence of keratinized mucosa: registered at the mid buccal site as "adequate" ≥2 mm, "inadequate" <2 mm (Moraschini et al. 2017).
Buccal recession; the distance from a fixed point - suprastructure/abutment connection to the mucosal margin in mm Saliva samples; Stimulated saliva will be collected for 5 min in sterile ice-chilled tubes while chewing on Parafilm.
Immediately after collection, volume of collected saliva will be recorded to determine salivary flow, while pH will be measured using a hand-held pH electrode or pH strips. Buffer capacity will be determined by adding 5 mM HCl in sample of the collect saliva in 3:1 ratio and then measuring the pH with a hand-held pH electrode or pH strips. Remaining saliva will be centrifuged at 7500 × g at 4°C for 10 min and stored in -80°C up to two months prior to further analysis. Total protein content in saliva will be measured using Pierce BCA protein assay, while calcium content will be determined with atomic absorption spectroscopy. Salivary antioxidant activity will be measured using ABTS assay. For these assays, the saliva samples will be thawed immediately prior to analysis and all samples will be discarded immediately after the assay is completed (edited 21.08.23) The following procedures will be performed by "the Operator" Radiographs of the implants showing clear projections of the implant threads at the mesial and distal surfaces will be taken using standard Eggens holders
All included implants receive the following treatment:
Repeated oral hygiene instruction if needed Submucosal instrumentation with ultrasonic device with a PEEK tip followed by copious irrigation with sterile saline Supramucosal polishing using polishing paste and rubber cup Following treatment, if local anesthesia was not applied, the subjects will be asked to grade the level of pain experienced on a 10 cm visual analogue scale (VAS).
The Examiner leaves the room prior to randomization performed by the Operator by opening a concealed envelope stating "test" or "control". Each subject may have more than one implant included in the study. All the implants will be scheduled for the same frequency of SPiT
3-, 6- and 9 weeks following baseline Appointments scheduled for High frequency SPiT implants only. At these time points, all implants are assessed by the Operator (non-blinded examination) and receive supramucosal polishing, submucosal instrumentation as described above and OHI- if necessary VAS scales are registered
12 weeks (3 months) following baseline At this time point, all implants are clinically examined by a blinded Examiner and receive supramucosal polishing as well as submucosal instrumentation and OHI as described above VAS scales are registered
16 weeks (4 months) following baseline Appointments scheduled for High frequency SPiT implants only. At this time points, all implants are assessed by the Operator and receive supramucosal polishing, submucosal instrumentation as described above and OHI- if necessary VAS scales are registered
24 weeks (6 months) following baseline At this time point, all implants are clinically examined by a blinded Examiner and receive supramucosal polishing as well as submucosal instrumentation and OHI as described above by the Operator VAS scales are registered
36 weeks (9 months) following baseline At this time point, all implants are clinically examined by a blinded Examiner and receive supramucosal polishing as well as submucosal instrumentation and OHI as described above by the Operator VAS scales are registered Radiographs are taken according to the baseline examination Referring dentist/dental hygienist (if any) is given written information about the treatment performed and the result, and suggested routines of follow-up is suggested
- Being tested
- Submocosal instrumentation using a ultrasonic device (PEEK). Submucosal cleaning
- Keywords
- Peri-implant mucositis, Supportive peri-implant treatment, Frequency
- Medical subject headings
- Peri-Implantitis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Submocosal instrumentation using a ultrasonic device (PEEK). Submucosal cleaningProcedure or surgery
The treatment under study is professional non-surgical, submucosal debridement with ultrasonic instruments with PolyEther Ether Ketone (PEEK) tip followed by copious irrigation with sterile saline
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Test. Increased treatment frequency | Experimental | Submucosal instrumentation will be performed at baseline, 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 9 weeks, 12 weeks, 16 weeks, 24 weeks and 36 weeks. Receives: Procedure: Submocosal instrumentation using a ultrasonic device (PEEK). Submucosal cleaning |
| Control. Conventional frequency | Active comparator | Submucosal instrumentation will be performed at baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks and 36 weeks Receives: Procedure: Submocosal instrumentation using a ultrasonic device (PEEK). Submucosal cleaning |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Peri-implant inflammation
To assess the proportion of implants without signs of inflammation (Inflammation is defined as; Bleeding on Probing (BoP) and/or suppuration)
Measured: From baseline to 9 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
Improvement of inflammation severity
Bleeding index (BI) 3, 2, 1, 0 (Roos-Jansåker et al., 2007)
Measured: From baseline to 9 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Dec 2024
- Study start1 Jan 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completion19 Jan 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion19 Jan 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Peri-Implantitis and Peri-implant MucositisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Oslo
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Odd Carsten Koldsland, University of Oslo
- Investigators
- Carl Hjortsjø, Ph.D, Principal investigator, Institute for Clinical Dentistry, Dental Faculty, University of Oslo
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06737328
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SPiT-frequency I_Peri-implant
- Other IDs
- REK790097
- Status last verified
- Dec 2024
- First submitted
- 25 Nov 2024
- Last updated
- 17 Dec 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: IPD used in the results publication
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Dec 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- SPiT-frequency I_Peri-implant Mucositis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06737328
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SPiT-frequency I_Peri-implant
- Keywords
- Peri-implant mucositis, Supportive peri-implant treatment, Frequency
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of OsloUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 19 Jan 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 19 Jan 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 17 Dec 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is an interventional clinical study on the peri-implant treatment necessary to improve the clinical conditions surrounding dental implants registered with peri-implant inflammation. The focus of this double-armed, examiner blinded, controlled, randomized clinical trial is to examine the effect of short-term increased frequency of a SPiT (supportive peri-implant treatment) protocol on implants diagnosed with peri-implant mucositis.
The study is a part of a project assessing the frequency of supportive peri-implant therapy. The current is on treatment of peri-implant mucositis (inflammation and no attachment loss at the implants) and secondary prevention of peri-implant mucositis. The other study is a RCT on non-surgical treatment of peri-implantitis (inflammation and exposed implant surface) (REK 790240). Exposure of rough surface may dramatically change the frequency of maintenance needed to improve the inflammatory condition. Thus, a segregation between adequate and low bone level at the implant is necessary.
Subjects with more than one implant and both diagnoses, may be enrolled in both studies, following the frequency of treatment randomized in the peri-implant mucositis study.
Detailed description
At the screening visit, the following tests and examination will be carried out to screen eligible subjects and provide baseline information for those patients that meet the study criteria:
- Anamnestic information as described in the regular electronic dental journal at the Faculty of Dentistry is collected
- Assessment of clinical registrations; suppuration, plaque, gingival bleeding, PPD, Bleeding index score and presence of keratinized mucosa
- Assessment of existing radiographs to ensure the subject and implants are eligible according to inclusion criteria
- Written and oral information on the study will be given
- Thorough information and instruction in plaque control with tools deemed appropriate by the operator
- Information about the study is given orally and written together with informed consent sheet
Visit 1 Baseline Signed inform consent is collected
An experienced, calibrated and board certified specialist in periodontology ("Examiner") performs the following clinical registrations at six sites (mesiobuccal, buccal, distobuccal, mesiolingual, lingual, distolingual) of the included implants:
Plaque: the presence or absence recognized by running a probe across the marginal surface of the implant (Mombelli et al. 1987). If plaque is present at the implants to be included, oral hygiene instructions are repeated and Baseline examination is rescheduled PICF (peri implant cravicular fluid): Peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF) will be collected from one site per implant, at the site with the most severe lesion at the baseline Suppuration: the presence or absence after light pressure against gingiva/mucosa or following gentle probing of the peri-implant pocket.
Mucosal bleeding: registered according to the Modified Sulcus Bleeding Index (mBI) (Mombelli et al. 1987).
PPD: recorded with a pressure- sensitive probe (20 g) (University of North Carolina probe, Aesculap, Braun, Tuttlingen, Germany).
Bleeding index score: measured at the implants after probing at six sites, and graded (0-3):
0 = no bleeding,
- = spot bleeding,
- = line bleeding
- = profound bleeding within 30 seconds after measurement of PPD. Presence of keratinized mucosa: registered at the mid buccal site as "adequate" ≥2 mm, "inadequate" <2 mm (Moraschini et al. 2017).
Buccal recession; the distance from a fixed point - suprastructure/abutment connection to the mucosal margin in mm Saliva samples; Stimulated saliva will be collected for 5 min in sterile ice-chilled tubes while chewing on Parafilm.
Immediately after collection, volume of collected saliva will be recorded to determine salivary flow, while pH will be measured using a hand-held pH electrode or pH strips. Buffer capacity will be determined by adding 5 mM HCl in sample of the collect saliva in 3:1 ratio and then measuring the pH with a hand-held pH electrode or pH strips. Remaining saliva will be centrifuged at 7500 × g at 4°C for 10 min and stored in -80°C up to two months prior to further analysis. Total protein content in saliva will be measured using Pierce BCA protein assay, while calcium content will be determined with atomic absorption spectroscopy. Salivary antioxidant activity will be measured using ABTS assay. For these assays, the saliva samples will be thawed immediately prior to analysis and all samples will be discarded immediately after the assay is completed (edited 21.08.23) The following procedures will be performed by "the Operator" Radiographs of the implants showing clear projections of the implant threads at the mesial and distal surfaces will be taken using standard Eggens holders
All included implants receive the following treatment:
Repeated oral hygiene instruction if needed Submucosal instrumentation with ultrasonic device with a PEEK tip followed by copious irrigation with sterile saline Supramucosal polishing using polishing paste and rubber cup Following treatment, if local anesthesia was not applied, the subjects will be asked to grade the level of pain experienced on a 10 cm visual analogue scale (VAS).
The Examiner leaves the room prior to randomization performed by the Operator by opening a concealed envelope stating "test" or "control". Each subject may have more than one implant included in the study. All the implants will be scheduled for the same frequency of SPiT
3-, 6- and 9 weeks following baseline Appointments scheduled for High frequency SPiT implants only. At these time points, all implants are assessed by the Operator (non-blinded examination) and receive supramucosal polishing, submucosal instrumentation as described above and OHI- if necessary VAS scales are registered
12 weeks (3 months) following baseline At this time point, all implants are clinically examined by a blinded Examiner and receive supramucosal polishing as well as submucosal instrumentation and OHI as described above VAS scales are registered
16 weeks (4 months) following baseline Appointments scheduled for High frequency SPiT implants only. At this time points, all implants are assessed by the Operator and receive supramucosal polishing, submucosal instrumentation as described above and OHI- if necessary VAS scales are registered
24 weeks (6 months) following baseline At this time point, all implants are clinically examined by a blinded Examiner and receive supramucosal polishing as well as submucosal instrumentation and OHI as described above by the Operator VAS scales are registered
36 weeks (9 months) following baseline At this time point, all implants are clinically examined by a blinded Examiner and receive supramucosal polishing as well as submucosal instrumentation and OHI as described above by the Operator VAS scales are registered Radiographs are taken according to the baseline examination Referring dentist/dental hygienist (if any) is given written information about the treatment performed and the result, and suggested routines of follow-up is suggested
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Test. Increased treatment frequency | Experimental | Procedure: Submocosal instrumentation using a ultrasonic device (PEEK). Submucosal cleaningSubmucosal instrumentation will be performed at baseline, 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 9 weeks, 12 weeks, 16 weeks, 24 weeks and 36 weeks. |
| Control. Conventional frequency | Active comparator | Procedure: Submocosal instrumentation using a ultrasonic device (PEEK). Submucosal cleaningSubmucosal instrumentation will be performed at baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks and 36 weeks |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Subject must be ≥ 20 years, diagnosed with peri-implant mucositis as defined by the World Workshop 2017 criteria (Berglundh et al., 2018) at an adequate (<0.5mm) bone level Peri-implant mucositis: Bleeding after gentle probing at an implant and no radiographic bone loss)
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Previous radiotherapy in the affected area, current use of chemotherapy, systemic long-term corticosteroid treatment.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Submocosal instrumentation using a ultrasonic device (PEEK). Submucosal cleaningThe treatment under study is professional non-surgical, submucosal debridement with ultrasonic instruments with PolyEther Ether Ketone (PEEK) tip followed by copious irrigation with sterile saline | Procedure or surgery | Control. Conventional frequency, Test. Increased treatment frequency |
Primary outcome
Peri-implant inflammation
Time frame: From baseline to 9 months
To assess the proportion of implants without signs of inflammation (Inflammation is defined as; Bleeding on Probing (BoP) and/or suppuration)
1 secondary outcome
Improvement of inflammation severity
Time frame: From baseline to 9 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Dec 2024.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. IPD used in the results publication
Related trials for Peri-Implantitis and Peri-implant Mucositis
RecruitingObservational study
Impact of Smoking on Immune Responses in Peri-implant Health and Disease
Peri-Implant Health, Peri Implant Mucositis
Not yet recruitingEarly Phase 1
Reconstructive Treatment of Peri-implantitis With Electrolytic Decontamination Versus Titanium Brushes
Peri-Implantitis and Peri-implant Mucositis
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Local and Systemic Inflammatory Bone Alterations Related to Dental Implant Survival.
Peri Implant Mucositis, Peri Implant Bone Loss
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Evaluation of aMMP-8 and IL-1β Levels and Marginal Bone Loss Associated With Peri-Implant Mucositis and Peri-Implantitis in Postmenopausal Women
Postmenopausal Peri-implant Health, Postmenopausal Peri-mucositis
Active, not recruiting
Evaluation of Implantoplasty in the Treatment of Peri-Implantitis.
Peri-Implantitis and Peri-implant Mucositis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Carl Hjortsjø, Ph.D principal investigator
Institute for Clinical Dentistry, Dental Faculty, University of Oslo
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Submocosal instrumentation using a ultrasonic device (PEEK). Submucosal cleaning in people with Peri-Implantitis and Peri-implant Mucositis, run by University of Oslo at 1 site in Norway.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Dec 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Norway. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Odd Carsten Koldsland, Ph.D, (+47 93098618, oddcko@odont.uio.no), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Peri-implant inflammation (time frame: From baseline to 9 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Dec 2024.