AzTrials
AzTrials

Nutrition, HealthyREFIPRONCT06739629

Refugee Insect Production for Food and Feed: the School Meal Intervention

A study testing Insect porridge and Maize Porridge in people with Nutrition, Healthy, run by University of Copenhagen at 1 site in Uganda.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to assess whether edible insect-enriched school porridge has nutrition and health benefits for children aged 6-9 years in refugee communities in Uganda. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 6 to 9 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Nutrition, Healthy
What is being tested?
Insect porridge and Maize Porridge
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
342 participants
Where
1 siteUganda
Study dates
17 Jun 2024to 25 Oct 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 6 to 9 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Children in Primary 1 in Bukere and Kako primary school
  • Age: 6-9 years
  • Child can eat insects
  • Written informed consent given by parent/caregiver

Who cannot join

  • Severe acute malnutrition measured as MUAC < 13.5 cm
  • Known allergies related to consuming insects
  • Disability that impedes eating capacity
  • Disability that makes height assessment problematic
  • Family plans to move away or deregister child from Kako and Bukere primary schools within the school term.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Uganda1 site
  • Kako and Bukere Primary School

    Kyegegwa

Other trials in Uganda

About this study

Official title: The School Meal Intervention: the Effect of Yellow Mealworm-enriched Maize Porridge on Nutrition and Health Status of 6-9-year-old Children

The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to assess whether edible insect-enriched school porridge has nutrition and health benefits for children aged 6-9 years in refugee communities in Uganda.

The main question the research aims to answer is: Does a daily serving of maize porridge enriched with yellow mealworm flour improve the gut health, growth, and micronutrient status of children in comparison to a standard maize porridge?

Participants will:

Consume a daily serving of yellow mealworm porridge or a maize porridge for one school term (3 months). Data is collected before, during and after the intervention period.

Being tested
Insect porridge, Maize Porridge

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Insect porridgeOther

    Also called Yellow mealworm porridge, Edible insect porridge

    Yellow mealworm porridge

  • Maize PorridgeOther

    Also called porridge

    Maize porridge

Study groups in NCT06739629
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Yellow mealworm-enriched porridgeExperimentalParticipants receive a daily meal of yellow mealworm-enriched porridge, served in schools. The porridge provides 420 Kcal/serving
Receives: Other: Insect porridge
Maize porridgeOtherParticipants receive a standard maize porridge served in schools. This porridge is comparable to the porridge served in the parent-led school feeding program.
Receives: Other: Maize Porridge

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in linear growth based on absolute height gain over 3 months intervention period

    Assessing the effect of the intervention on height gain measured in cm

    Measured: 3 months

Secondary outcomes (24)
  1. Change in myeloperoxidase (MPO) over 3 months intervention period

    Assessing the effect of the intervention on myeloperoxidase (ng/mL), which is a stool marker for Environmental Enteric Dysfunction (EED). A high value indicates high intestinal inflammation.

    Measured: 3 months

  2. Change in alpha-1-anti-trypsin (AAT) over 3 months intervention period

    Assessing the effect of the intervention on alpha-1-anti-trypsin (mg/g) which is a stool marker for Enteric Environemtal Dysfunction ( EED). A high value indicates high intestinal protein loss.

    Measured: 3 months

  3. Change in in Neopterin (NEO) over the 3 months intervention period

    Assessing the effect of the intervention on Neopterin ( nmol/L) which is a stool marker for Enteric Environemtal Dysfunction (EED). A high value indicates intestinal inflammation.

    Measured: 3 months

  4. Change in weight over the 3 months intervention period

    Assessing the effect of the intervention on weight gain (kg)

    Measured: 3 months

  5. Change in BMI- for- age Z-score over 3 months intervention period

    Assessing the effect of the intervention on BMI-for-age Z-score, by combining weight (Kg) and Height (m2) to report BMI (kg/m2) using the cut offs: Overweight: >+1SD, Obesity: >+2SD, Thinness: <-2SD, Severe thinness: <-3SD

    Measured: 3 months

  6. Change in Height- for-age Z-score over the 3 months intervention period

    Assessing the effect of the intervention on height-for-age Z-score values using the cut offs: < -2 to -3 HAZ moderately stunted, HAZ < -3 severely stunted

    Measured: 3 months

  7. Change in Weight- for-age Z-score over the 3 months intervention period

    Assessing the effect of the intervention on weight-for-age Z-score using the cut offs: -2 to-3 WAZ moderately underweight, WAZ < -3 severely underweight

    Measured: 3 months

  8. Change in Mid-Upper Arm Circumference (MUAC) over the 3 months intervention period

    Assessing the effect of the intervention on the Mid-Upper Arm Circumference in cm using the cut-offs: <13.5cm severe acute malnutrition, 13.5cm -14.5cm moderate acute malnutrition.

    Measured: 3 months

  9. Change in Subscapular and Triceps skinfold thickness over 3 months intervention period

    Assessing the effect of the intervention on subscapular and triceps skinfold thickness measured in mm.

    Measured: 3 months

  10. Change in waist circumference measurement over 3 months intervention period

    Assessing the effect of the intervention on waist circumference measured in cm.

    Measured: 3 months

  11. Change in fat mass over the 3 months intervention period

    Assessing the effect of the intervention on fat mass measured in kgs using deuterium dilution method and bioimpedance analyzer. Low fat mass indicates healthier body composition.

    Measured: 3 months

  12. Change in fat free mass over the 3 months intervention period

    Assessing the effect of the intervention on fat free mass measured in kg using deuterium dilution method and bioimpedance analyzer. A high fat free mass indicates high muscle mass and healthier body composition.

    Measured: 3 months

  13. Change in fat mass index over the 3 months intervention period

    Assessing the effect of the intervention on fat mass index measured in kg/m2, using deuterium dilution method and bioimpedance analyzer. Low fat mass index indicates a healthier body composition.

    Measured: 3 months

  14. Change in fat free mass index over 3 months intervention period

    Assessing the effect of the intervention on fat free mass index ( FFMI) measured in kg/m2 using deuterium dilution method and bioimpedance analyzer. A high fat free mass index indicates high muscle mass and healthier body composition

    Measured: 3 months

  15. Change in C- reactive protein (CRP) over the 3 months intervention period

    Assessing the effect of the intervention on C-reactive Protein(mg/L) which is a blood marker for systemic inflammation. High CRP values indicate systemic inflammation.

    Measured: 3 months

  16. Change in alpha-1-acid glycoprotein (AGP) over the 3 months intervention period

    Assessing the effect of the intervention on alpha-1-acid glycoprotein (g/L) which is a blood marker for systemic inflammation. High AGP values indicate systemic inflammation.

    Measured: 3 months

  17. Change in insulin like growth factor (IGF-1) over the 3 months intervention period

    Assessing the effect of the intervention on insulin like growth factor (ng/mL) which is a blood markers for growth. High IGF-1 values support growth.

    Measured: 3 months

  18. Change in hemoglobin over the 3 months intervention period

    Assessing the effect of the intervention on hemoglobin measured in g/dL. Low hemoglobin levels indicate Anemia.

    Measured: 3 months

  19. Change in ferritin over the 3 months intervention period

    Assessing the effect of the intervention on serum ferritin measured in μg/L. A low level of serum ferritin indicates Anemia.

    Measured: 3 months

  20. Change in soluble transferrin receptor (sTfR) over the 3 months intervention period

    Assessing the effect of the intervention on soluble transferrin receptor measured in mg/L. A high level of sTfR is associated with Anemia.

    Measured: 3 months

  21. Change in cobalamin over the 3 months intervention period

    Assessing the effect of the intervention on cobalamin measured in pmol/L. A low level of cobalamin is associated with Vitamin B12 deficiency.

    Measured: 3 months

  22. Change in retinol binding protein (RBP) over the 3 months intervention period

    Assessing the effect of the intervention on serum retinol binding protein (RBP) measured in µmol/l. A low level of RBP is associated with Vitamin A deficiency.

    Measured: 3 months

  23. Change in methyl malonic acid (MMA) over the 3 months intervention period

    Assessing the effect of the intervention on methyl malonic acid (MMA) measured in nmol/L. A high level of MMA indicates Vitamin B12 deficiency.

    Measured: 3 months

  24. Change in citrulline over the 3 months intervention period

    Assessing the effect of the intervention on plasma citrulline measured in μmol/L. A low level of citrulline indicates impaired intestinal function.

    Measured: 3 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Dec 2024
  2. Study start17 Jun 2024
  3. Primary completion25 Oct 2024
  4. Study completion25 Oct 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Two-arm randomized intervention
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
342 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06739629
Sponsor's protocol ID
S400- REFIPRO STUDY
Acronym
REFIPRO
Status last verified
Dec 2024
First submitted
22 Nov 2024
Last updated
27 Dec 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Insect porridge and Maize Porridge in people with Nutrition, Healthy, run by University of Copenhagen at 1 site in Uganda.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Dec 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Uganda. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in linear growth based on absolute height gain over 3 months intervention period (time frame: 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Dec 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in