Low Back PainNCT06756685
Effects of Core Strengthening Versus Motor Control Training on Pain, Disability & Endurance in Low Back Pain
A study testing Core Strengthening Exercises in people with Low Back Pain, run by Riphah International University at 1 site in Pakistan.
Trial summary
The study aims to compare the effects of core strengthening versus motor control training on pain, disability \& endurance in patients with low back pain Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 25 to 60 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Low Back Pain
- What is being tested?
- Core Strengthening Exercises
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 74 participants
- Where
- 1 sitePakistan
- Study dates
- 7 Aug 2024to 10 Jan 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 25 to 60 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Non-specific Chronic low back pain (>3 months)
- Pain between the T12 vertebra and gluteal fold with pain of 2-8 on the numerical rating scale of 0-10
- Both Genders
- Age of 25 and above
Who cannot join
- Participants fall in this category would be excluded of the study.
- Lumbar radiculopathy
- Structural scoliosis
- Traumatic spinal injury
- Cauda equina syndrome
- History of seizures, epilepsy, stroke or head injury
Show all 9Show fewer
- Metal implants
- Pregnancy or considering pregnancy in near future
- Body mass >/= 100kg
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Pakistan1 site
Mediplex Health Care Center
Rawalpindi, Punjab Province, 46060
About this study
Official title: Effects of Core Strengthening Versus Motor Control Training on Pain, Disability & Endurance in Patients With Low Back Pain
The study aims to compare the effects of core strengthening versus motor control training on pain, disability \& endurance in patients with low back pain
Read the detailed description
The study aims to compare the effects of core strengthening versus motor control training on pain, disability \& endurance in patients with low back pain.
Comparing core strength and conditioning versus motor control for low back pain on physical and self-report outcomes lies in identifying the most effective treatment approach for this condition. This will help to determine which one yields better results in terms of improving physical function and reducing self-reported pain and disability associated with low back pain. This study can provide valuable insights for clinicians and patients in selecting the most appropriate treatment option.
- Conditions
- Low Back Pain
- Being tested
- Core Strengthening Exercises, Motor Control Training
- Keywords
- back pain, disability, endurance, core strengthening, motor control
- Medical subject headings
- Low Back Pain, Back Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Core Strengthening ExercisesOther
The Core Strengthening Program participants will have supervised gym-based sessions for 8 weeks. In the first 4 weeks , participants will attend two 1 hour training sessions, followed by self-selected one or two sessions per week. The session will begin with 20min of aerobic conditioning of walking or running on a treadmill, starting at 65% and moving to 85% of HR max. The 5 key elements of focus are i. Centering ii. Breathing iii. Head and neck placement iv. Shoulder placement v. Chest wall placement
Motor Control TrainingOther
Participants in Motor Control group will receive two physiotherapy sessions of 1hour / week in the first 4 weeks, during stage 1. i. Abdominal drawing-in maneuver (ADIM) : isometric contraction of the local stability muscles (e.g., lumbar multifidus, transversus abdominis) in minimally loading positions (supine lying, quadruped, sitting, and standing) by maintaining a neutral spine while maintaining normal breathing. During Phase 2, One 1 hour session / week in the second 4 weeks.
Activation and facilitation of transversus abdominis, lumbar multifidus and pelvic floor motor control(36).Exercises target the transversus abdominis, multifidus and pelvic floor muscles plus postural correction to restore optimal motor control during non-weight-bearing activities. Exercises and progressions will follow previous protocols of motor control exercise.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Core Strengthening Exercises | Experimental | Core Strengthening Exercises Receives: Other: Core Strengthening Exercises |
| Motor Control Training | Active comparator | Motor Control Training Receives: Other: Motor Control Training |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Goniometer
A goniometer will be used to measure ranges of motion of Trunk in Flexion, Extension, lateral Flexion and Rotation
Measured: 8 weeks
Lower body strength
One-repetition maximum (1-RM) leg press at 70% 1-RM will be used to evaluate lower body strength.
Measured: 8 weeks
Modified Oswestry disability index
The Oswestry Disability Index is considered one of the best accepted tools for assessment of low back pain. It is a patient-completed questionnaire which gives a subjective percentage score of level of function (disability) in activities of daily living in chronic low back pain. The ODI is made up of 10 items. Each item consist of 6 statements which are scored from 0 to 5. With 0 indicating the least disability and 5 the greatest then the total score is calculated as a percentage, with 0% indicating no disability and 100% indicating the highest level of disability.
ODI = (Sum of items scored/Sum of sections answered) X 100
Measured: 8 weeks
Tampa scale of kinesiophobia
The Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK) was first developed in 1991 by R. Miller, S. Kopri, and D. Todd. A self-reported questionnaire that quantifies fear of movement, or (re)injury.It uses a 4-point Likert scale (Strongly Disagree-Disagree-Agree-Strongly Agree).The 17 item TSK total scores range from 17 to 68 where the lowest 17 means no or negligible kinesiophobia, and the higher scores indicate an increasing degree of kinesiophobia.Scores above 37 (17-item) are generally considered to indicate kinesiophobia.
Measured: 8 weeks
Visual analog scale
The pain VAS is a uni dimensional measure of pain intensity, used to record patients' pain progression, or compare pain severity.Using a ruler, the score is determined by measuring the distance (mm) on the 10-cm line between the "no pain" anchor and the patient's mark, providing a range of scores from 0-100. A higher score indicates greater pain intensity.no pain (0-4 mm), mild pain(5-44 mm), moderate pain (45-74 mm), and severe pain (75-100 mm).Test-retest reliability has been shown to be good and moderate to good reliability for disability in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain.
Measured: 8 weeks
Japanese orthopedic association back pain evaluation questionnaire
The JOABPEQ includes twenty-five questions that are subdivided into five sub scales: lower back pain, lumbar function, walking ability, social life function, and mental health. These questions are Intended to evaluate individuals with low back pain from five different perspectives.scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better patient condition. Both kappa and weighted kappa were more than 0.50 for all but one item, which was 0.48.
Measured: 8 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Jan 2025
- Study start7 Aug 2024
- Primary completion1 Jan 2025
- Study completion10 Jan 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Low Back PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Riphah International UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 74 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Riphah International University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Sabiha Fayyaz, MS-NMPT*, Principal investigator, Riphah International University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06756685
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 014384/Sabiha Fayyaz
- Status last verified
- Aug 2025
- First submitted
- 13 Aug 2024
- Last updated
- 29 Aug 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Aug 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effects of Core Strengthening Versus Motor Control Training on Pain, Disability & Endurance in Patients With Low Back Pain
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06756685
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 014384/Sabiha Fayyaz
- Conditions
- Low Back Pain
- Keywords
- back pain, disability, endurance, core strengthening, motor control
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 74 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Riphah International UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 7 Aug 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jan 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 10 Jan 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 3 Jan 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The study aims to compare the effects of core strengthening versus motor control training on pain, disability \& endurance in patients with low back pain
Detailed description
The study aims to compare the effects of core strengthening versus motor control training on pain, disability \& endurance in patients with low back pain.
Comparing core strength and conditioning versus motor control for low back pain on physical and self-report outcomes lies in identifying the most effective treatment approach for this condition. This will help to determine which one yields better results in terms of improving physical function and reducing self-reported pain and disability associated with low back pain. This study can provide valuable insights for clinicians and patients in selecting the most appropriate treatment option.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Core Strengthening Exercises | Experimental | Other: Core Strengthening ExercisesCore Strengthening Exercises |
| Motor Control Training | Active comparator | Other: Motor Control TrainingMotor Control Training |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 25 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Non-specific Chronic low back pain (>3 months)
- Pain between the T12 vertebra and gluteal fold with pain of 2-8 on the numerical rating scale of 0-10
- Both Genders
- Age of 25 and above
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Participants fall in this category would be excluded of the study.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Core Strengthening ExercisesThe Core Strengthening Program participants will have supervised gym-based sessions for 8 weeks. In the first 4 weeks , participants will attend two 1 hour training sessions, followed by self-selected one or two sessions per week. The session will begin with 20min of aerobic conditioning of walking or running on a treadmill, starting at 65% and moving to 85% of HR max. The 5 key elements of focus are i. Centering ii. Breathing iii. Head and neck placement iv. Shoulder placement v. Chest wall placement | Other | Core Strengthening Exercises |
| Motor Control TrainingParticipants in Motor Control group will receive two physiotherapy sessions of 1hour / week in the first 4 weeks, during stage 1. i. Abdominal drawing-in maneuver (ADIM) : isometric contraction of the local stability muscles (e.g., lumbar multifidus, transversus abdominis) in minimally loading positions (supine lying, quadruped, sitting, and standing) by maintaining a neutral spine while maintaining normal breathing. During Phase 2, One 1 hour session / week in the second 4 weeks. Activation and facilitation of transversus abdominis, lumbar multifidus and pelvic floor motor control(36).Exercises target the transversus abdominis, multifidus and pelvic floor muscles plus postural correction to restore optimal motor control during non-weight-bearing activities. Exercises and progressions will follow previous protocols of motor control exercise. | Other | Motor Control Training |
Primary outcome
Goniometer
Time frame: 8 weeks
A goniometer will be used to measure ranges of motion of Trunk in Flexion, Extension, lateral Flexion and Rotation
Lower body strength
Time frame: 8 weeks
One-repetition maximum (1-RM) leg press at 70% 1-RM will be used to evaluate lower body strength.
Modified Oswestry disability index
Time frame: 8 weeks
The Oswestry Disability Index is considered one of the best accepted tools for assessment of low back pain. It is a patient-completed questionnaire which gives a subjective percentage score of level of function (disability) in activities of daily living in chronic low back pain. The ODI is made up of 10 items. Each item consist of 6 statements which are scored from 0 to 5. With 0 indicating the least disability and 5 the greatest then the total score is calculated as a percentage, with 0% indicating no disability and 100% indicating the highest level of disability. ODI = (Sum of items scored/Sum of sections answered) X 100
Tampa scale of kinesiophobia
Time frame: 8 weeks
The Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK) was first developed in 1991 by R. Miller, S. Kopri, and D. Todd. A self-reported questionnaire that quantifies fear of movement, or (re)injury.It uses a 4-point Likert scale (Strongly Disagree-Disagree-Agree-Strongly Agree).The 17 item TSK total scores range from 17 to 68 where the lowest 17 means no or negligible kinesiophobia, and the higher scores indicate an increasing degree of kinesiophobia.Scores above 37 (17-item) are generally considered to indicate kinesiophobia.
Visual analog scale
Time frame: 8 weeks
The pain VAS is a uni dimensional measure of pain intensity, used to record patients' pain progression, or compare pain severity.Using a ruler, the score is determined by measuring the distance (mm) on the 10-cm line between the "no pain" anchor and the patient's mark, providing a range of scores from 0-100. A higher score indicates greater pain intensity.no pain (0-4 mm), mild pain(5-44 mm), moderate pain (45-74 mm), and severe pain (75-100 mm).Test-retest reliability has been shown to be good and moderate to good reliability for disability in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain.
Japanese orthopedic association back pain evaluation questionnaire
Time frame: 8 weeks
The JOABPEQ includes twenty-five questions that are subdivided into five sub scales: lower back pain, lumbar function, walking ability, social life function, and mental health. These questions are Intended to evaluate individuals with low back pain from five different perspectives.scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better patient condition. Both kappa and weighted kappa were more than 0.50 for all but one item, which was 0.48.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Aug 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Hip Hinge Exercises on Pain, Range of Motion and Functional Disability in Non-specific Low Back Pain.
Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Lumbar Stabilization Exercises With and Without YTWL (Scapular Stabilization Exercises) on Reducing Chronic Low Back Pain and Related Disability. A Randomized Clinical Trial,
Chronic Non Specific Mechanical Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Comparing Non-Medicine Strategies for Improving Low Back Pain
Chronic Low-back Pain (cLBP), High-Impact Chronic Pain (HICP)
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Whole-Body Vibration and Cervical Stabilization With Core Stabilization in Young Adults With Non-Specific Low Back Pain
Nonspecific Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Spinery Basivertebral Nerve Ablation for Vertebrogenic Chronic Low Back Pain
Low Back Pain, Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Sabiha Fayyaz, MS-NMPT* principal investigator
Riphah International University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Core Strengthening Exercises in people with Low Back Pain, run by Riphah International University at 1 site in Pakistan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Aug 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Pakistan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Goniometer (time frame: 8 weeks). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Aug 2025.