Low Back PainNCT06757400
Τhe Effect of Lumbar Spine Mobilization and Manipulation on Pressure Pain Threshold in Patients With NSLBP
A study testing Mobilization and manipulation in people with Low Back Pain and Lumbago, run by University of West Attica at 1 site in Greece.
Trial summary
Manual therapy, including mobilizations and manipulations, appears to be as effective as other types of therapy for chronic low back pain. The aim of this cross-sectional study is to compare the effects of lumbar spine mobilization and manipulation on the pressure pain threshold in patients with non-specific chronic… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Low Back Pain, Lumbago
- What is being tested?
- Mobilization and manipulation
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 27 participants
- Where
- 1 siteGreece
- Study dates
- 4 Nov 2023to 23 Apr 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- 18 to 60 years old
- diagniosed with non specific low back pain
- symptoms lasting for more than 12 weeks
Who cannot join
- spinal fractures,
- neurological impairment due to herniated spinal disc,
- spondylolisthesis,
- joint degenerative diseases,
- osteoporosis,
- spinal infections,
Show all 11Show fewer
- cauda equina syndrome,
- spinal tumors or bone marrow malignancies,
- spinal surgeries
- history of cancer,
- use of steroids
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Τhe Effect of Lumbar Spine Mobilization and Manipulation on Pressure Pain Threshold in Patients With Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain: a Cross-over Randomised Controlled Trial
Manual therapy, including mobilizations and manipulations, appears to be as effective as other types of therapy for chronic low back pain.
The aim of this cross-sectional study is to compare the effects of lumbar spine mobilization and manipulation on the pressure pain threshold in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain.
Read the detailed description
Background: Manual therapy, including mobilizations and manipulations, appears to be equally effective as other types of therapy for chronic low back pain. According to the Orthopaedic Section of the American Physical Therapy Association (APTA), there is evidence indicating that these techniques can reduce pain, improve spinal and hip mobility, and decrease disability in patients with low back pain. The aim of this study is to compare the effects of lumbar spine mobilization and manipulation on the pressure pain threshold in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain.
Methods: The present study will be a cross-sectional study in which participants will be men and women aged 18 to 60 years. The sample size was estimated by effect size, with a minimum of 27 participants required to provide statistically or clinically significant results. Each subject will receive two interventions-mobilization or manipulation-on two different days, in a random order. The primary outcomes will be pain perception, including subjective pain intensity and pressure pain threshold. Secondary outcomes will include the range of motion (ROM) of lumbar spine flexion, extension, and lateral flexion. Data will be collected before and after each intervention. Assessors will use a digital algometer, an electronic inclinometer, and a numerical rating scale (NRS). ANOVA and t-test calculations will be performed on data processed by SPSS Version 25 to analyze results for all outcomes. The level of significance will be set at 5% (p = 0.05) with a confidence interval of 95% (CI = 95%).
- Conditions
- Low Back Pain, Lumbago
- Being tested
- Mobilization, manipulation
- Keywords
- non-specific low back pain, manual therapy, hypoalgesia, pressure pain threshold
- Medical subject headings
- Low Back Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MobilizationOther
Mobilization will be conducted on an examination table with the subject in prone position. Therapist will place his hypothenar to the most hypomobile lumbar spine segment after assessment.It will be a posteroanterior (PA) direction tecnique, Maitland's GRADE 4, 3 sets of 60 seconds duration for each set.
manipulationOther
Manipulation will be conducted on an examination table with the subject in right lateral decubitus. It will be a rotary manipulation to the most hypomobile lumbar spine segment after assessment.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Mobilization | Experimental | 27 patients with chronic low back pain will be assigned to receive one intervention with grade IV posteroanterior (PA) mobilization in the Lumbar spine Receives: Other: Mobilization; Other: manipulation |
| Manipulation | Active comparator | 27 patients with chronic low back pain will be assigned to receive one intervention with lumbar manipulation Receives: Other: Mobilization; Other: manipulation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
1. Pressure pain threshold
Changes between pre- and post- intervention in Pressure Pain Threshold will be measured using at the L5 spinous process, upper trapezius muscle the tibialis anterior muscle. The COMPACT DIGITAL ALGOMETER CAPACITIES TO: 100 lbf / 50 kgf / 500 N, will be used by an independent assessor. The assessor will be blinded to participants' group.
Measured: Baseline and 15 minutes
Secondary outcomes (2)
Range Of Motion (ROM)
ROM will be measured in sagittal (flexion and extension) and frontal planes (right and left lateral bending) using an electronic goniometer. The participants will perform each movement three times were performed and the average will be recorded for the analysis
Measured: Baseline and 15 minutes
Pain Intensity
Participants will complete a self- reported numerical pain rating scale (NRS) from 0-10, with "0" indicated no pain and "10" the maximum possible pain, covering pain intensity over the past week
Measured: Baseline and 15 minutes
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Jan 2025
- Study start4 Nov 2023
- Primary completion28 Feb 2024
- Study completion23 Apr 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Low Back PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 27 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of West Attica
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Stefanos Karanasios, University of West Attica
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06757400
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 65273- 07/07/2023
- Status last verified
- Dec 2024
- First submitted
- 26 May 2024
- Last updated
- 6 Jan 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Dal Farra F, Risio RG, Vismara L, Bergna A. Effectiveness of osteopathic interventions in chronic non-specific low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Complement Ther Med. 2021 Jan;56:102616. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2020.102616. Epub 2020 Nov 13.
PubMed 33197571Childs JD, Fritz JM, Flynn TW, Irrgang JJ, Johnson KK, Majkowski GR, Delitto A. A clinical prediction rule to identify patients with low back pain most likely to benefit from spinal manipulation: a validation study. Ann Intern Med. 2004 Dec 21;141(12):920-8. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-141-12-200412210-00008.
PubMed 15611489Rubinstein SM, de Zoete A, van Middelkoop M, Assendelft WJJ, de Boer MR, van Tulder MW. Benefits and harms of spinal manipulative therapy for the treatment of chronic low back pain: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2019 Mar 13;364:l689. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l689.
PubMed 30867144Arribas-Romano A, Fernandez-Carnero J, Molina-Rueda F, Angulo-Diaz-Parreno S, Navarro-Santana MJ. Efficacy of Physical Therapy on Nociceptive Pain Processing Alterations in Patients with Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Pain Med. 2020 Oct 1;21(10):2502-2517. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnz366.
PubMed 32100027Coronado RA, Gay CW, Bialosky JE, Carnaby GD, Bishop MD, George SZ. Changes in pain sensitivity following spinal manipulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2012 Oct;22(5):752-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2011.12.013. Epub 2012 Jan 30.
PubMed 22296867
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Jan 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Τhe Effect of Lumbar Spine Mobilization and Manipulation on Pressure Pain Threshold in Patients With Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain: a Cross-over Randomised Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06757400
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 65273- 07/07/2023
- Conditions
- Low Back Pain, Lumbago
- Keywords
- non-specific low back pain, manual therapy, hypoalgesia, pressure pain threshold
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 27 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of West AtticaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 4 Nov 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 28 Feb 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 23 Apr 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 3 Jan 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Manual therapy, including mobilizations and manipulations, appears to be as effective as other types of therapy for chronic low back pain.
The aim of this cross-sectional study is to compare the effects of lumbar spine mobilization and manipulation on the pressure pain threshold in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain.
Detailed description
Background: Manual therapy, including mobilizations and manipulations, appears to be equally effective as other types of therapy for chronic low back pain. According to the Orthopaedic Section of the American Physical Therapy Association (APTA), there is evidence indicating that these techniques can reduce pain, improve spinal and hip mobility, and decrease disability in patients with low back pain. The aim of this study is to compare the effects of lumbar spine mobilization and manipulation on the pressure pain threshold in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain.
Methods: The present study will be a cross-sectional study in which participants will be men and women aged 18 to 60 years. The sample size was estimated by effect size, with a minimum of 27 participants required to provide statistically or clinically significant results. Each subject will receive two interventions-mobilization or manipulation-on two different days, in a random order. The primary outcomes will be pain perception, including subjective pain intensity and pressure pain threshold. Secondary outcomes will include the range of motion (ROM) of lumbar spine flexion, extension, and lateral flexion. Data will be collected before and after each intervention. Assessors will use a digital algometer, an electronic inclinometer, and a numerical rating scale (NRS). ANOVA and t-test calculations will be performed on data processed by SPSS Version 25 to analyze results for all outcomes. The level of significance will be set at 5% (p = 0.05) with a confidence interval of 95% (CI = 95%).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Mobilization | Experimental | Other: Mobilization, Other: manipulation27 patients with chronic low back pain will be assigned to receive one intervention with grade IV posteroanterior (PA) mobilization in the Lumbar spine |
| Manipulation | Active comparator | Other: Mobilization, Other: manipulation27 patients with chronic low back pain will be assigned to receive one intervention with lumbar manipulation |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- 18 to 60 years old
- diagniosed with non specific low back pain
- symptoms lasting for more than 12 weeks
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- spinal fractures,
- neurological impairment due to herniated spinal disc,
- spondylolisthesis,
- joint degenerative diseases,
- osteoporosis,
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| MobilizationMobilization will be conducted on an examination table with the subject in prone position. Therapist will place his hypothenar to the most hypomobile lumbar spine segment after assessment.It will be a posteroanterior (PA) direction tecnique, Maitland's GRADE 4, 3 sets of 60 seconds duration for each set. | Other | Manipulation, Mobilization |
| manipulationManipulation will be conducted on an examination table with the subject in right lateral decubitus. It will be a rotary manipulation to the most hypomobile lumbar spine segment after assessment. | Other | Manipulation, Mobilization |
Primary outcome
1. Pressure pain threshold
Time frame: Baseline and 15 minutes
Changes between pre- and post- intervention in Pressure Pain Threshold will be measured using at the L5 spinous process, upper trapezius muscle the tibialis anterior muscle. The COMPACT DIGITAL ALGOMETER CAPACITIES TO: 100 lbf / 50 kgf / 500 N, will be used by an independent assessor. The assessor will be blinded to participants' group.
2 secondary outcomes
Range Of Motion (ROM)
Time frame: Baseline and 15 minutes
Pain Intensity
Time frame: Baseline and 15 minutes
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Jan 2025.
- Results publication: PubMed 33197571Dal Farra F, Risio RG, Vismara L, Bergna A. Effectiveness of osteopathic interventions in chronic non-specific low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Complement Ther Med. 2021 Jan;56:102616. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2020.102616. Epub 2020 Nov 13.
- Results publication: PubMed 15611489Childs JD, Fritz JM, Flynn TW, Irrgang JJ, Johnson KK, Majkowski GR, Delitto A. A clinical prediction rule to identify patients with low back pain most likely to benefit from spinal manipulation: a validation study. Ann Intern Med. 2004 Dec 21;141(12):920-8. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-141-12-200412210-00008.
- Results publication: PubMed 30867144Rubinstein SM, de Zoete A, van Middelkoop M, Assendelft WJJ, de Boer MR, van Tulder MW. Benefits and harms of spinal manipulative therapy for the treatment of chronic low back pain: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2019 Mar 13;364:l689. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l689.
- Results publication: PubMed 32100027Arribas-Romano A, Fernandez-Carnero J, Molina-Rueda F, Angulo-Diaz-Parreno S, Navarro-Santana MJ. Efficacy of Physical Therapy on Nociceptive Pain Processing Alterations in Patients with Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Pain Med. 2020 Oct 1;21(10):2502-2517. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnz366.
- Results publication: PubMed 22296867Coronado RA, Gay CW, Bialosky JE, Carnaby GD, Bishop MD, George SZ. Changes in pain sensitivity following spinal manipulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2012 Oct;22(5):752-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2011.12.013. Epub 2012 Jan 30.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Hip Hinge Exercises on Pain, Range of Motion and Functional Disability in Non-specific Low Back Pain.
Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Lumbar Stabilization Exercises With and Without YTWL (Scapular Stabilization Exercises) on Reducing Chronic Low Back Pain and Related Disability. A Randomized Clinical Trial,
Chronic Non Specific Mechanical Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Comparing Non-Medicine Strategies for Improving Low Back Pain
Chronic Low-back Pain (cLBP), High-Impact Chronic Pain (HICP)
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Whole-Body Vibration and Cervical Stabilization With Core Stabilization in Young Adults With Non-Specific Low Back Pain
Nonspecific Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Spinery Basivertebral Nerve Ablation for Vertebrogenic Chronic Low Back Pain
Low Back Pain, Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Mobilization and manipulation in people with Low Back Pain and Lumbago, run by University of West Attica at 1 site in Greece.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Jan 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Greece. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
1. Pressure pain threshold (time frame: Baseline and 15 minutes). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06757400, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Jan 2025.