Muscle HypertrophyNCT06760663
The Load-velocity Relationship: Neuromuscular Adaptations to Resistance Training
A study testing The load-velocity relationship: Neuromuscular adaptations to resistance training in people with Muscle Hypertrophy, run by University of Lisbon at 1 site in Portugal.
Trial summary
Adaptations to resistance training are highly specific and depend on the combination of external loading and the level of individual adaptability. As the relationship between load and velocity of movement is strong and linear, the application of velocity-based training (VBT) has been proposed to enable load… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 30 years, men onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Muscle Hypertrophy
- What is being tested?
- The load-velocity relationship: Neuromuscular adaptations to resistance training
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 sitePortugal
- Study dates
- 3 Mar 2025to 30 Dec 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 30 years
- Men only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Individuals without neurologic conditions;
- Individuals without lower and upper limb disabilities;
- Individuals without any known disease.;
- All participants must be familiar with Resistance Training (≥ 3 times per week, for at least 3 years of practice).
Who cannot join
- Individuals with known metabolic disease;
- Individuals with known cardiovascular disease;
- Individuals with respiratory disorders or other orthopedic conditions that limit exercise.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Portugal1 site
Faculdade de Motricidade Humana Universidade de Lisboa
Cruz Quebrada, Oeiras, 1495-751
About this study
Adaptations to resistance training are highly specific and depend on the combination of external loading and the level of individual adaptability. As the relationship between load and velocity of movement is strong and linear, the application of velocity-based training (VBT) has been proposed to enable load adjustments to ensure that exercise is performed at a given intensity independently of several factors such as fatigue. It was recently shown that VBT potentiates increases in muscle strength and power when compared to that seen following a percent-based training (PBT). As the development of muscle strength is explained by the combination of hypertrophy and heightened neural drive, it is important to unravel whether VBT is superior to PBT in eliciting positive adaptations at both these levels or exclusively at one of them. Thus, the aim of this study is to thoroughly compare the neuromuscular adaptations of VBT with the ones found in PBT.
Read the detailed description
The primary aim of this project is to compare the effect of VBT with that of PBT on muscular hypertrophy and neuromuscular RT adaptations during an intervention of similar volume lasting 10 weeks. As a secondary purpose, the investigators also intend to examine the relationship between these adaptations with post-training gains in different forms of muscle strength (slow and fast-speed strength, as well as endurance muscle strength). As a tertiary purpose, the investigators aim at determining how neuromuscular fatigue, training stress and muscular damage evolve in response to VBT and PBT during the 10-week intervention. As a quaternary purpose, the investigators intend to assess if the results are consistent for both upper-body and lower-body RT exercises.
The investigators hypothesize that, after 10 weeks of RT, (i) despite showing larger increases in strength, power and muscular activation [increases in motor unit firing rate and recruitment due to high speed contractions ] , due to a lower level of mechanical tension during training , participants assigned to VBT will display less muscular hypertrophy; (ii) participants assigned to VBT will present larger increases in slow- and fast-speed strength and athletes assigned to PBT will present larger increases in endurance strength ; (iii) participants assigned to VBT will present less neuromuscular fatigue, training stress and muscular damage; (iv) the aforementioned hypothesized outcomes will be consistent for both upper- and lower-body RT exercises.
Research Plan and Methods Participants Recruitment Healthy male participants aged 18-30 years without neurologic conditions, lower and upper limb disabilities, or any known disease will be recruited. All participants must be familiar with RT (≥ 3 times per week, for at least 3 years of practice). Additional exclusion criteria will be known metabolic, cardiovascular, respiratory disorders or other orthopedic conditions that limit exercise. The participants will need to sign an informed consent before participation, already approved by the institutional review board (CEFMH Nº 28/2023).
Study Design Participants will be randomly allocated to one of three groups: PBT, VBT or VBT performed as fast as possible (VBT-F). All groups will entail a RT intervention and all groups will be assessed at baseline, 4 weeks, and 10 weeks (T0, T4, and T10, respectively).
Sample Size Justification Based on the effect size of the differences in the back-squat one-repetition maximum (1RM) after 6 weeks of PBT and VBT (and accounting for a 25% attrition rate due to the study's longitudinal nature) a total of 30 participants (10 per group) will be recruited to provide 95% statistical power .
RT Protocols RT will be performed 3 times per week, with a minimum of 48h rest between each session. Participants will perform 3 sets of repetitions of the free-weight back squat and free-weight bench press per session, with the number of sets incrementing by one each 2 weeks. , at a load corresponding to 85%1RM. VBT-F participants will perform the same number of sets and repetitions as those enrolled in PBT and VBT, with the concentric phase performed at maximal intended velocity. In both exercises, the eccentric phase will be performed in a non-explosive and controlled condition and without imposing a pause before the beginning of the concentric contraction. Exercise load will correspond to 85%, 77.5% and 70% of the 1RM on the first, second and third sessions of the week, respectively. The VBT and VBT-F group will adjust loads each session according to meaningfull fluctuations in MCV (0.06 m/s and 0.02 m/s for the squat and bench press, respectively). MCV will be monitored using a validated linear position transducer sampling the bar's velocity at a frequency of 1,000 Hz (Chronojump, Barcelona, Spain). Velocity feedback will be given to participants during RT sessions.
Testing
Testing will involve two sessions to avoid prolonged data collection and minimize mental and physical fatigue. Objective measures of strength, muscular and neurophysiological properties will be collected as briefly described below:
Muscle Hypertrophy Assessments of muscle cross-sectional area, muscle thickness, fascicle length and pennation angle will be conducted via ultrasonography [B-mode device (Noblus; Hitachi Aloka Medical Systems, Tokyo, Japan) with a linear-array probe (4.0 cm)] . Participants will be instructed to lie supine and relaxed. As the magnitude of muscle hypertrophy may differ between proximal and distal portions of the muscle, measurements will be performed at various sites of the quadriceps femoris and the pectoralis major.
Strength and Muscular Activation Back squat and bench press maximum voluntary isometric contractions (MVIC) will be conducted on a Smith-Machine (Matrix Fitness; G1 Smith machine, Cottage Grove, WI) coupled to a force plate with a sampling rate of 1,000 Hz (Bertec, Colombia, USA). Three MVICs will be performed, lasting 5 s each with a 60 s interval of rest between trials. Participants will be instructed to exert their maximum force as fast and hard as possible. Rate of force development will be calculated sequentially as the slope of force-time relationship during each MVIC trial (0-50, 50-100 and 100-150 ms after force onset). Then, a countermovement jump (CMJ) and a bench press-throw test, comprised of 3 attempts, will be performed to assess fast-speed strength. Additionally, 1RM will also be determined for the free-weight back squat and the free-weight bench press to assess slow-speed strength. 1RM will also be used to set the initial loads of the PBT intervention. 1RM will be defined as the maximal load mobilized throughout full range of motion in a single repetition. Lastly, participants will perform a set to volitional failure with a load corresponding to 60% 1RM for the back squat and bench press (endurance strength). Strong verbal encouragement will be provided for motivation. Surface electromyography (EMG) of the quadriceps femoris and pectoralis major will be used to quantify muscle activation during all testing sessions through bipolar wireless sensors (EMG Delsys, TrignoTM), sampled at a 1,000 Hz. Raw EMG data will be stored in digital format using the Acqknowledge 4.3.1 software (BIOPAC Systems Inc., Goleta, CA) and smoothed by root mean square (RMS) calculation. The RMS will be indicative of the amplitude of muscular activation and the RMS obtained in response to dynamic assessments will be normalized to that obtained at MVIC.
Training Stress, Neuromuscular Fatigue and Muscular Damage Each week, all participants will complete three CMJ. Additionally, participants will provide their rate of perceived exertion (RPE), on an increasing scale from 1-10, of each performed set during the RT intervention. Lastly, weekly assessments of capillary creatine kinase (CKMM) will be conducted. To determine CKMM activity, a sample of 32 μl of capillary blood will be collected from the ear lobe into a tube containing heparin (Cat n ° 9550532 Reflotron ®. These three assessments will be the indicators of neuromuscular fatigue, training stress and muscular damage, respectively, throughout the intervention .
Statistical Analysis All data will be presented as means and standard deviation and will be tested for normality and homoscedasticity with the Shapiro-Wilk and Levene's test, respectively. A two-way repeated measures ANOVA [condition (PBT vs. VBT-F vs. VBT) x time (T0 vs. T4 vs. T10)] will be used to explore main effects and interactions for each dependent variable. Adjustment of multiple comparisons will be made with Bonferroni's correction. Data analyses will be performed using SPSS software version 27.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and statistical significance will be set at p < 0.05.
- Conditions
- Muscle Hypertrophy
- Being tested
- The load-velocity relationship: Neuromuscular adaptations to resistance training
- Keywords
- load-velocity relationship, neuromuscular, hypertrophy, strength, velocity-based training
- Medical subject headings
- Hypertrophy
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
The load-velocity relationship: Neuromuscular adaptations to resistance trainingBehavioural
Comparing the impact of adjusting training load based on movement velocity on hypertrophy and neural adaptations.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage Based-Training (PBT) | Active comparator | Training load will be prescribed in a traditional fashion. No adjustments of load will be performed. Receives: Behavioral: The load-velocity relationship: Neuromuscular adaptations to resistance training |
| Velocity Based Training (VBT) | Experimental | Training load will be adjusted according to daily fluctuations in movement velocity. Receives: Behavioral: The load-velocity relationship: Neuromuscular adaptations to resistance training |
| Fast Velocity Based Training (VBT-F) | Experimental | Training load will be adjusted according to fluctuations in movement velocity. Repetitions will be performed as fast as possible. Receives: Behavioral: The load-velocity relationship: Neuromuscular adaptations to resistance training |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Pectoralis major cross sectional area
Measurements of cross sectional area of the right pectoralis major muscle
Measured: 10 weeks
Quadriceps femoris cross sectional area
Cross sectional area of the right quadriceps femoris muscle
Measured: 10 weeks
Quadriceps femoris muscular thickness
Muscular thickness f the right quadriceps femoris muscle
Measured: 10 weeks
Pectoralis major muscular thickness
Muscular thickness of the right pectoralis major muscle
Measured: 10 weeks
Secondary outcomes (8)
Back Squat Maximal Strength
Measurement of maximal voluntary isometric contraction of the smith machine back squat
Measured: 10 weeks
Muscular activation
Measurements of surface electromyography on the pectoralis major and vastus lateralis.
Measured: 10 weeks
Bench Press Maximal Strenght
Measurement of the maximum voluntary isometric contraction of the smith machine bench
Measured: 10 weeks
Back squat and bench press one-repetition maximum
Incremental loading protocol of the back squat and bench press exercises.
Measured: 10 weeks
Back Squat and Bench Press Load-Velocity relationships
Measurement of the velocity at which different relative loads are lifted in the bench press and back squat exercises
Measured: 10 weeks
Back squat and bench press strength endurance
Determination of the maximum number of repetitions performed at 60% of the one-repetition maximum of the bench press and back squat exercises
Measured: 10 weeks
Countermovement jump height
Determination of the maximal achieved height of 3 attempts of the countermovement jump
Measured: 10 weeks
Bench press throw height
Determination of the maximum height at which a weighted barbell can be thrown with 30, 40 and 50% of the one repetition maximum of the bench press
Measured: 10 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Jan 2025
- Study start3 Mar 2025
- Primary completion30 Dec 2025
- Study completion30 Dec 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Muscle HypertrophyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Model description
- Each of the 3 groups will perform 10 weeks of training. After all data is collected, it will be processed.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Lisbon
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Faculdade de Motricidade Humana
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Afonso Fitas, University of Lisbon
- Investigators
- Gonçalo Mendonca, PhD, Study director, Faculdade de Motricidade Humana - Universidade de Lisboa
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06760663
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CEIFMH Nº 28/2023
- Other IDs
- 2023.02063.BD, 2023
- Status last verified
- Jan 2026
- First submitted
- 5 Oct 2024
- Last updated
- 13 Jan 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Jan 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Load-velocity Relationship: Neuromuscular Adaptations to Resistance Training
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06760663
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CEIFMH Nº 28/2023
- Conditions
- Muscle Hypertrophy
- Keywords
- load-velocity relationship, neuromuscular, hypertrophy, strength, velocity-based training
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of LisbonUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Faculdade de Motricidade Humana
- Study start
- 3 Mar 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Dec 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Dec 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Jan 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Adaptations to resistance training are highly specific and depend on the combination of external loading and the level of individual adaptability. As the relationship between load and velocity of movement is strong and linear, the application of velocity-based training (VBT) has been proposed to enable load adjustments to ensure that exercise is performed at a given intensity independently of several factors such as fatigue. It was recently shown that VBT potentiates increases in muscle strength and power when compared to that seen following a percent-based training (PBT). As the development of muscle strength is explained by the combination of hypertrophy and heightened neural drive, it is important to unravel whether VBT is superior to PBT in eliciting positive adaptations at both these levels or exclusively at one of them. Thus, the aim of this study is to thoroughly compare the neuromuscular adaptations of VBT with the ones found in PBT.
Detailed description
The primary aim of this project is to compare the effect of VBT with that of PBT on muscular hypertrophy and neuromuscular RT adaptations during an intervention of similar volume lasting 10 weeks. As a secondary purpose, the investigators also intend to examine the relationship between these adaptations with post-training gains in different forms of muscle strength (slow and fast-speed strength, as well as endurance muscle strength). As a tertiary purpose, the investigators aim at determining how neuromuscular fatigue, training stress and muscular damage evolve in response to VBT and PBT during the 10-week intervention. As a quaternary purpose, the investigators intend to assess if the results are consistent for both upper-body and lower-body RT exercises.
The investigators hypothesize that, after 10 weeks of RT, (i) despite showing larger increases in strength, power and muscular activation [increases in motor unit firing rate and recruitment due to high speed contractions ] , due to a lower level of mechanical tension during training , participants assigned to VBT will display less muscular hypertrophy; (ii) participants assigned to VBT will present larger increases in slow- and fast-speed strength and athletes assigned to PBT will present larger increases in endurance strength ; (iii) participants assigned to VBT will present less neuromuscular fatigue, training stress and muscular damage; (iv) the aforementioned hypothesized outcomes will be consistent for both upper- and lower-body RT exercises.
Research Plan and Methods Participants Recruitment Healthy male participants aged 18-30 years without neurologic conditions, lower and upper limb disabilities, or any known disease will be recruited. All participants must be familiar with RT (≥ 3 times per week, for at least 3 years of practice). Additional exclusion criteria will be known metabolic, cardiovascular, respiratory disorders or other orthopedic conditions that limit exercise. The participants will need to sign an informed consent before participation, already approved by the institutional review board (CEFMH Nº 28/2023).
Study Design Participants will be randomly allocated to one of three groups: PBT, VBT or VBT performed as fast as possible (VBT-F). All groups will entail a RT intervention and all groups will be assessed at baseline, 4 weeks, and 10 weeks (T0, T4, and T10, respectively).
Sample Size Justification Based on the effect size of the differences in the back-squat one-repetition maximum (1RM) after 6 weeks of PBT and VBT (and accounting for a 25% attrition rate due to the study's longitudinal nature) a total of 30 participants (10 per group) will be recruited to provide 95% statistical power .
RT Protocols RT will be performed 3 times per week, with a minimum of 48h rest between each session. Participants will perform 3 sets of repetitions of the free-weight back squat and free-weight bench press per session, with the number of sets incrementing by one each 2 weeks. , at a load corresponding to 85%1RM. VBT-F participants will perform the same number of sets and repetitions as those enrolled in PBT and VBT, with the concentric phase performed at maximal intended velocity. In both exercises, the eccentric phase will be performed in a non-explosive and controlled condition and without imposing a pause before the beginning of the concentric contraction. Exercise load will correspond to 85%, 77.5% and 70% of the 1RM on the first, second and third sessions of the week, respectively. The VBT and VBT-F group will adjust loads each session according to meaningfull fluctuations in MCV (0.06 m/s and 0.02 m/s for the squat and bench press, respectively). MCV will be monitored using a validated linear position transducer sampling the bar's velocity at a frequency of 1,000 Hz (Chronojump, Barcelona, Spain). Velocity feedback will be given to participants during RT sessions.
Testing
Testing will involve two sessions to avoid prolonged data collection and minimize mental and physical fatigue. Objective measures of strength, muscular and neurophysiological properties will be collected as briefly described below:
Muscle Hypertrophy Assessments of muscle cross-sectional area, muscle thickness, fascicle length and pennation angle will be conducted via ultrasonography [B-mode device (Noblus; Hitachi Aloka Medical Systems, Tokyo, Japan) with a linear-array probe (4.0 cm)] . Participants will be instructed to lie supine and relaxed. As the magnitude of muscle hypertrophy may differ between proximal and distal portions of the muscle, measurements will be performed at various sites of the quadriceps femoris and the pectoralis major.
Strength and Muscular Activation Back squat and bench press maximum voluntary isometric contractions (MVIC) will be conducted on a Smith-Machine (Matrix Fitness; G1 Smith machine, Cottage Grove, WI) coupled to a force plate with a sampling rate of 1,000 Hz (Bertec, Colombia, USA). Three MVICs will be performed, lasting 5 s each with a 60 s interval of rest between trials. Participants will be instructed to exert their maximum force as fast and hard as possible. Rate of force development will be calculated sequentially as the slope of force-time relationship during each MVIC trial (0-50, 50-100 and 100-150 ms after force onset). Then, a countermovement jump (CMJ) and a bench press-throw test, comprised of 3 attempts, will be performed to assess fast-speed strength. Additionally, 1RM will also be determined for the free-weight back squat and the free-weight bench press to assess slow-speed strength. 1RM will also be used to set the initial loads of the PBT intervention. 1RM will be defined as the maximal load mobilized throughout full range of motion in a single repetition. Lastly, participants will perform a set to volitional failure with a load corresponding to 60% 1RM for the back squat and bench press (endurance strength). Strong verbal encouragement will be provided for motivation. Surface electromyography (EMG) of the quadriceps femoris and pectoralis major will be used to quantify muscle activation during all testing sessions through bipolar wireless sensors (EMG Delsys, TrignoTM), sampled at a 1,000 Hz. Raw EMG data will be stored in digital format using the Acqknowledge 4.3.1 software (BIOPAC Systems Inc., Goleta, CA) and smoothed by root mean square (RMS) calculation. The RMS will be indicative of the amplitude of muscular activation and the RMS obtained in response to dynamic assessments will be normalized to that obtained at MVIC.
Training Stress, Neuromuscular Fatigue and Muscular Damage Each week, all participants will complete three CMJ. Additionally, participants will provide their rate of perceived exertion (RPE), on an increasing scale from 1-10, of each performed set during the RT intervention. Lastly, weekly assessments of capillary creatine kinase (CKMM) will be conducted. To determine CKMM activity, a sample of 32 μl of capillary blood will be collected from the ear lobe into a tube containing heparin (Cat n ° 9550532 Reflotron ®. These three assessments will be the indicators of neuromuscular fatigue, training stress and muscular damage, respectively, throughout the intervention .
Statistical Analysis All data will be presented as means and standard deviation and will be tested for normality and homoscedasticity with the Shapiro-Wilk and Levene's test, respectively. A two-way repeated measures ANOVA [condition (PBT vs. VBT-F vs. VBT) x time (T0 vs. T4 vs. T10)] will be used to explore main effects and interactions for each dependent variable. Adjustment of multiple comparisons will be made with Bonferroni's correction. Data analyses will be performed using SPSS software version 27.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and statistical significance will be set at p < 0.05.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- Each of the 3 groups will perform 10 weeks of training. After all data is collected, it will be processed.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage Based-Training (PBT) | Active comparator | Behavioral: The load-velocity relationship: Neuromuscular adaptations to resistance trainingTraining load will be prescribed in a traditional fashion. No adjustments of load will be performed. |
| Velocity Based Training (VBT) | Experimental | Behavioral: The load-velocity relationship: Neuromuscular adaptations to resistance trainingTraining load will be adjusted according to daily fluctuations in movement velocity. |
| Fast Velocity Based Training (VBT-F) | Experimental | Behavioral: The load-velocity relationship: Neuromuscular adaptations to resistance trainingTraining load will be adjusted according to fluctuations in movement velocity. Repetitions will be performed as fast as possible. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 30 years
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Individuals without neurologic conditions;
- Individuals without lower and upper limb disabilities;
- Individuals without any known disease.;
- All participants must be familiar with Resistance Training (≥ 3 times per week, for at least 3 years of practice).
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Individuals with known metabolic disease;
- Individuals with known cardiovascular disease;
- Individuals with respiratory disorders or other orthopedic conditions that limit exercise.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| The load-velocity relationship: Neuromuscular adaptations to resistance trainingComparing the impact of adjusting training load based on movement velocity on hypertrophy and neural adaptations. | Behavioural | Fast Velocity Based Training (VBT-F), Percentage Based-Training (PBT), Velocity Based Training (VBT) |
Primary outcome
Pectoralis major cross sectional area
Time frame: 10 weeks
Measurements of cross sectional area of the right pectoralis major muscle
Quadriceps femoris cross sectional area
Time frame: 10 weeks
Cross sectional area of the right quadriceps femoris muscle
Quadriceps femoris muscular thickness
Time frame: 10 weeks
Muscular thickness f the right quadriceps femoris muscle
Pectoralis major muscular thickness
Time frame: 10 weeks
Muscular thickness of the right pectoralis major muscle
8 secondary outcomes
Back Squat Maximal Strength
Time frame: 10 weeks
Muscular activation
Time frame: 10 weeks
Bench Press Maximal Strenght
Time frame: 10 weeks
Back squat and bench press one-repetition maximum
Time frame: 10 weeks
Back Squat and Bench Press Load-Velocity relationships
Time frame: 10 weeks
Back squat and bench press strength endurance
Time frame: 10 weeks
Countermovement jump height
Time frame: 10 weeks
Bench press throw height
Time frame: 10 weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Jan 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Muscle Hypertrophy
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Traditional and Cluster Set Resistance Training on Muscle Strength, Hypertrophy, and Power
Strength Training Adaptations
Not yet recruiting
"CORE Training for Musculoskeletal Health: A Study on Adaptive Exercise Protocols"
Core Muscle Weakness, Postural Control Deficit
RecruitingObservational study
Rare Disease Patient Registry & Natural History Study - Coordination of Rare Diseases at Sanford
Rare Disorders, Undiagnosed Disorders
Not yet recruiting
Comparison Between Eccentric Hamstring Training and Sprint-Specific Training
Healthy Adult, Athlete
Enrolling by invitation
Applicability of Tissue Flossing for Blood Flow Restriction in the Upper Limb: Reliability and Performance Analysis
Hypertrophy, Muscle Strength
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Gonçalo Mendonca, PhD study director
Faculdade de Motricidade Humana - Universidade de Lisboa
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing The load-velocity relationship: Neuromuscular adaptations to resistance training in people with Muscle Hypertrophy, run by University of Lisbon at 1 site in Portugal.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Portugal. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Pectoralis major cross sectional area (time frame: 10 weeks). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Jan 2026.