AzTrials
AzTrials

Lower Limb InjuryNCT06779968

Multimodal Analgesia Versus Peripheral Nerve Block for Postoperative Pain Management After Lower Limb Injury Surgery

A study testing Femoral Nerve Block, Combined Sciatic and Femoral Nerve Block and Lumbar plexus block in people with Lower Limb Injury, run by Xiaguang Duan at 1 site in China.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this clinical trial is to understand the effectiveness of femoral nerve block, combined sciatic and femoral nerve block, lumbar plexus block, epidural block, and intravenous analgesia pump in the application of lower limb injury (total knee replacement, knee arthroscopy, patella fracture, femoral shaft… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 2 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Lower Limb Injury
What is being tested?
Femoral Nerve Block, Combined Sciatic and Femoral Nerve Block and Lumbar plexus block
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
150 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
20 Jan 2025to 10 May 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 2 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification I-III
  • Patients (or their guardians) voluntarily participate in this study and sign a written informed consent form
  • Patients (or their guardians) are able to understand the study content and cooperate with the study protocol

Who cannot join

  • Known allergy to local anesthetics or opioid analgesics.
  • Presence of contraindications to local or epidural anesthesia.
  • Presence of undiagnosed or poorly characterized neuropathic pain.
  • Presence of severe mental illness that would impede the participant's ability to cooperate with study assessment and treatment procedures.
  • Clinically significant coagulopathy or current use of anticoagulant medications.
  • Presence of infection at the planned puncture site or systemic infection.
  • Pregnancy or lactation.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Xiaguang Duan, Master's degree contact

+86 13314720012

alonlord2023@gmail.com

China1 site
  • Inner Mongolia Baogang Hospital

    Baotou, Inner Mongolia, 014010

    Xiangyu Wang, Master's degree, +86 0472 5992830, KevinDuan0901@gmail.com

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Multimodal Analgesia Versus Peripheral Nerve Block for Postoperative Pain Management After Lower Limb Injury Surgery: a Randomized Controlled Trial

The purpose of this clinical trial is to understand the effectiveness of femoral nerve block, combined sciatic and femoral nerve block, lumbar plexus block, epidural block, and intravenous analgesia pump in the application of lower limb injury (total knee replacement, knee arthroscopy, patella fracture, femoral shaft fracture) surgery. It will also understand the safety of the drugs liposomal bupivacaine and ropivacaine. The main question it aims to answer is: Does nerve block reduce the number of times participants need to use analgesics postoperatively? The researchers will compare femoral nerve block, combined sciatic and femoral nerve block, lumbar plexus block, epidural block, and intravenous analgesia pump to see which analgesic method has the best postoperative analgesic effect. Participants will: undergo nerve block first, then endotracheal intubation general anesthesia after entering the operating room; record vital signs during surgery, record postoperative analgesic doses, NRS pain scores, patient satisfaction, and postoperative nausea and vomiting.

Read the detailed description

Study Design: This study was a prospective, randomized, controlled, comparative clinical trial with both participant and clinician blinding. This trial was designed to assess both the superiority and non-inferiority of different analgesic modalities in the management of postoperative pain following lower limb surgery. The study evaluated the effectiveness of femoral nerve block, combined sciatic and femoral nerve block, lumbar plexus block, epidural analgesia, and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for patients undergoing procedures such as total knee replacement, knee arthroscopy, patella fracture repair, and pediatric femoral shaft fracture repair. Participants were recruited from Baogang Hospital, Inner Mongolia. This study received approval from the Medical Ethics Committee of Baogang Hospital, Inner Mongolia, and was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines. All participants provided informed written consent.

Patients:A total of 150 patients, classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I, II, or III and aged 2 years or older, undergoing postoperative analgesia for lower limb injuries were recruited between February 2025 and May 2025. Participants were randomly assigned to one of five study groups, with 30 participants in each group.

Randomization and Blinding:This study employed block randomization to generate the random allocation sequence. A block size of 6 was set, and the random sequence was generated using dedicated software (the blockrand package in R version 4.3.2). The allocation of the random sequence was performed by an independent third party, and allocation concealment was implemented using sequentially numbered, sealed, opaque envelopes. The research team remained blinded throughout the randomization process and was not involved in the generation or allocation of the random sequence.

Intervention: Upon arrival to the operating room, patients will be monitored with electrocardiography, blood pressure, and pulse oximetry. Patients will be placed in the prone position with their arms abducted and internally rotated. Ultrasound guidance will be used for all regional anesthesia procedures (SonoSite Edge II; Fujifilm SonoSite, Bothell, WA, USA) with a linear 13-6 MHz ultrasound probe (HFL50x; Fujifilm SonoSite, Bothell, WA, USA). For each block, a 5 mL test dose will be injected initially, followed by observation for clinical signs of a successful block. After confirming correct placement, the remaining dose of the anesthetic agent will be injected. Following administration of the regional anesthesia, general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation will be performed. Anesthesia induction will be achieved using propofol (1.5-2 mg/kg i.v.), rocuronium (1-2 mg/kg i.v.), and fentanyl (1-2 μg/kg i.v.). Anesthesia will be maintained using sevoflurane or desflurane, with inhaled concentration adjusted based on Bispectral Index (BIS) monitoring. A continuous infusion of remifentanil (0.05-0.2 μg/kg/min) will be administered, with adjustments to maintain blood pressure and heart rate within ±20% of baseline values. Following induction, patients will be mechanically ventilated in pressure-regulated volume control (PRVC) mode. The ventilator (Aestiva; GE Healthcare, Waukesha, Wisconsin, USA) settings will be: tidal volume 6-8 mL/kg, positive end-expiratory pressure 0 cm H2O, inspiratory to expiratory ratio 1:2, respiratory rate 16 breaths per minute (BPM), and fraction of inspired oxygen 41%.

Femoral Nerve Block (FNB) Group: In the femoral nerve block (FNB) group, the femoral nerve was blocked distal to the inguinal ligament and lateral to the femoral artery. Under sterile conditions and ultrasound guidance using a short-axis out-of-plane approach, a 22-gauge insulated needle was advanced adjacent to the femoral nerve. Following confirmation of correct needle tip placement, a 20 mL volume of either 266 mg liposomal bupivacaine (diluted as indicated) or 0.2% ropivacaine was injected. This was followed by a continuous infusion at a rate of 5-10 mL/hr. For pediatric patients, a continuous infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine was administered at an initial bolus of 0.2-0.5 mg/kg, followed by a continuous infusion of 0.1-0.3 mg/kg/hr.

Combined Sciatic and Femoral Nerve Block (CS-FNB) Group: In the combined sciatic and femoral nerve block (CS-FNB) group, the femoral nerve block was performed as described above. The sciatic nerve block was performed at either the gluteal region or popliteal fossa. Under sterile conditions and ultrasound guidance using either an in-plane or out-of-plane approach, a 22-gauge insulated needle was advanced adjacent to the sciatic nerve. Following confirmation of correct needle tip placement, a 20 mL volume of either 266 mg liposomal bupivacaine (diluted as indicated) or 0.2% ropivacaine was injected. This was followed by a continuous infusion at a rate of 5-10 mL/hr. For pediatric patients, a continuous infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine was administered at an initial bolus of 0.2-0.5 mg/kg, followed by a continuous infusion of 0.1-0.3 mg/kg/hr.

Lumbar Plexus Block (LPB) Group: In the lumbar plexus block (LPB) group, the lumbar plexus was blocked paraspinally within the psoas muscle. Under sterile conditions, ultrasound guidance, or with the assistance of a nerve stimulator, using either an in-plane or out-of-plane approach, a 22-gauge insulated needle was advanced within the psoas muscle adjacent to the lumbar plexus. Following confirmation of correct needle tip placement, a 20 mL volume of either 266 mg liposomal bupivacaine (diluted as indicated) or 0.2% ropivacaine was injected. This was followed by a continuous infusion at a rate of 5-10 mL/hr. For pediatric patients, a continuous infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine was administered at an initial bolus of 0.2-0.5 mg/kg, followed by a continuous infusion of 0.1-0.3 mg/kg/hr.

Epidural Analgesia: For epidural analgesia, an initial bolus of 5-15 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine was administered followed by a continuous infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine at a rate of 3-10 mL/hr. For pediatric patients, an initial bolus of 0.2% ropivacaine at 0.5-1 mg/kg was administered, not exceeding a maximum total dose of 2-2.5 mg/kg, followed by a continuous infusion of 0.1-0.3 mg/kg/hr.

Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia (PCA): For intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), fentanyl was administered at a dose of 2 mcg/kg, diluted in 100 mL of normal saline. The basal infusion rate was set at 2 mL/hr, with a PCA dose of 2 mL and a lockout interval of 15 minutes.

Outcomes and measures:Participants were followed up in the ward by two specially trained research nurses who were blinded to the participants' treatment group assignments. Outcome assessments were conducted at the following time points: prior to treatment (baseline), 2 hours postoperatively, 6 hours postoperatively, 12 hours postoperatively, and 24 hours postoperatively. These assessments were performed either in person or via telephone.

Being tested
Femoral Nerve Block, Combined Sciatic and Femoral Nerve Block, Lumbar plexus block, Epidural Analgesia, Intravenous patient-controlled analgesia
Medical subject headings
Leg Injuries

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Femoral Nerve BlockDevice

    In the femoral nerve block (FNB) group, the femoral nerve was blocked distal to the inguinal ligament and lateral to the femoral artery. Under sterile conditions and ultrasound guidance using a short-axis out-of-plane approach, a 22-gauge insulated needle was advanced adjacent to the femoral nerve. Following confirmation of correct needle tip placement, a 20 mL volume of either 266 mg liposomal bupivacaine (diluted as indicated) or 0.2% ropivacaine was injected. This was followed by a continuous infusion at a rate of 5-10 mL/hr. For pediatric patients, a continuous infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine was administered at an initial bolus of 0.2-0.5 mg/kg, followed by a continuous infusion of 0.1-0.3 mg/kg/hr.

  • Combined Sciatic and Femoral Nerve BlockDevice

    In the combined sciatic and femoral nerve block (CS-FNB) group, the femoral nerve block was performed as described above. The sciatic nerve block was performed at either the gluteal region or popliteal fossa. Under sterile conditions and ultrasound guidance using either an in-plane or out-of-plane approach, a 22-gauge insulated needle was advanced adjacent to the sciatic nerve. Following confirmation of correct needle tip placement, a 20 mL volume of either 266 mg liposomal bupivacaine (diluted as indicated) or 0.2% ropivacaine was injected. This was followed by a continuous infusion at a rate of 5-10 mL/hr. For pediatric patients, a continuous infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine was administered at an initial bolus of 0.2-0.5 mg/kg, followed by a continuous infusion of 0.1-0.3 mg/kg/hr.

  • Lumbar plexus blockDevice

    In the lumbar plexus block (LPB) group, the lumbar plexus was blocked paraspinally within the psoas muscle. Under sterile conditions, ultrasound guidance, or with the assistance of a nerve stimulator, using either an in-plane or out-of-plane approach, a 22-gauge insulated needle was advanced within the psoas muscle adjacent to the lumbar plexus. Following confirmation of correct needle tip placement, a 20 mL volume of either 266 mg liposomal bupivacaine (diluted as indicated) or 0.2% ropivacaine was injected. This was followed by a continuous infusion at a rate of 5-10 mL/hr. For pediatric patients, a continuous infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine was administered at an initial bolus of 0.2-0.5 mg/kg, followed by a continuous infusion of 0.1-0.3 mg/kg/hr.

  • Epidural AnalgesiaProcedure or surgery

    For epidural analgesia, an initial bolus of 5-15 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine was administered followed by a continuous infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine at a rate of 3-10 mL/hr. For pediatric patients, an initial bolus of 0.2% ropivacaine at 0.5-1 mg/kg was administered, not exceeding a maximum total dose of 2-2.5 mg/kg, followed by a continuous infusion of 0.1-0.3 mg/kg/hr.

  • Intravenous patient-controlled analgesiaDrug

    For intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), fentanyl was administered at a dose of 2 mcg/kg, diluted in 100 mL of normal saline. The basal infusion rate was set at 2 mL/hr, with a PCA dose of 2 mL and a lockout interval of 15 minutes.

  • General AneasthesiaDevice

    Following administration of the regional anesthesia, general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation will be performed. Anesthesia induction will be achieved using propofol (1.5-2 mg/kg i.v.), rocuronium (1-2 mg/kg i.v.), and fentanyl (1-2 μg/kg i.v.). Anesthesia will be maintained using sevoflurane or desflurane, with inhaled concentration adjusted based on Bispectral Index (BIS) monitoring. A continuous infusion of remifentanil (0.05-0.2 μg/kg/min) will be administered, with adjustments to maintain blood pressure and heart rate within ±20% of baseline values. Following induction, patients will be mechanically ventilated in pressure-regulated volume control (PRVC) mode. The ventilator (Aestiva; GE Healthcare, Waukesha, Wisconsin, USA) settings will be: tidal volume 6-8 mL/kg, positive end-expiratory pressure 0 cm H2O, inspiratory to expiratory ratio 1:2, respiratory rate 16 breaths per minute (BPM), and fraction of inspired oxygen 41%.

Study groups in NCT06779968
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
FNB GroupExperimentalIn the femoral nerve block (FNB) group, the femoral nerve was blocked distal to the inguinal ligament and lateral to the femoral artery. Under sterile conditions and ultrasound guidance using a short-axis out-of-plane approach, a 22-gauge insulated needle was advanced adjacent to the femoral nerve. Following confirmation of correct needle tip placement, a 20 mL volume of either 266 mg liposomal bupivacaine (diluted as indicated) or 0.2% ropivacaine was injected. This was followed by a continuous infusion at a rate of 5-10 mL/hr. For pediatric patients, a continuous infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine was administered at an initial bolus of 0.2-0.5 mg/kg, followed by a continuous infusion of 0.1-0.3 mg/kg/hr.
Receives: Device: Femoral Nerve Block; Device: General Aneasthesia
CS-FNB GroupExperimentalIn the combined sciatic and femoral nerve block (CS-FNB) group, the femoral nerve block was performed as described above. The sciatic nerve block was performed at either the gluteal region or popliteal fossa. Under sterile conditions and ultrasound guidance using either an in-plane or out-of-plane approach, a 22-gauge insulated needle was advanced adjacent to the sciatic nerve. Following confirmation of correct needle tip placement, a 20 mL volume of either 266 mg liposomal bupivacaine (diluted as indicated) or 0.2% ropivacaine was injected. This was followed by a continuous infusion at a rate of 5-10 mL/hr. For pediatric patients, a continuous infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine was administered at an initial bolus of 0.2-0.5 mg/kg, followed by a continuous infusion of 0.1-0.3 mg/kg/hr.
Receives: Device: Combined Sciatic and Femoral Nerve Block; Device: General Aneasthesia
LPB GroupExperimentalIn the lumbar plexus block (LPB) group, the lumbar plexus was blocked paraspinally within the psoas muscle. Under sterile conditions, ultrasound guidance, or with the assistance of a nerve stimulator, using either an in-plane or out-of-plane approach, a 22-gauge insulated needle was advanced within the psoas muscle adjacent to the lumbar plexus. Following confirmation of correct needle tip placement, a 20 mL volume of either 266 mg liposomal bupivacaine (diluted as indicated) or 0.2% ropivacaine was injected. This was followed by a continuous infusion at a rate of 5-10 mL/hr. For pediatric patients, a continuous infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine was administered at an initial bolus of 0.2-0.5 mg/kg, followed by a continuous infusion of 0.1-0.3 mg/kg/hr.
Receives: Device: Lumbar plexus block; Device: General Aneasthesia
EA groupActive comparatorFor epidural analgesia, an initial bolus of 5-15 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine was administered followed by a continuous infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine at a rate of 3-10 mL/hr. For pediatric patients, an initial bolus of 0.2% ropivacaine at 0.5-1 mg/kg was administered, not exceeding a maximum total dose of 2-2.5 mg/kg, followed by a continuous infusion of 0.1-0.3 mg/kg/hr.
Receives: Procedure: Epidural Analgesia
PCA groupExperimentalFor intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), fentanyl was administered at a dose of 2 mcg/kg, diluted in 100 mL of normal saline. The basal infusion rate was set at 2 mL/hr, with a PCA dose of 2 mL and a lockout interval of 15 minutes.
Receives: Drug: Intravenous patient-controlled analgesia; Device: General Aneasthesia

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Numerical Rating Scale(NRS)

    The NRS, Numerical Rating Scale, is a rating system from 0 to 10, where 0 represents "no pain" and 10 represents the worst possible pain.

    Measured: At baseline (before therapy), at 2 hours post-treatment, at 6 hours post-treatment, at 12 hours post-treatment, and at 24 hours post-treatment

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Postoperative Opioid Consumption

    This measure records the total amount of opioid medication (e.g., fentanyl) consumed by the patient post-operatively. Both intravenous (via PCA) and oral opioid consumption will be recorded in total.

    Measured: Total consumption measured at 24 hours post-treatment and at 48 hours post-treatment.

  2. Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV)

    PONV is assessed by recording the presence or absence of nausea and vomiting. If present, the severity of nausea will be evaluated using a qualitative scale (e.g., none, mild, moderate, severe) or a scoring system such as the PONV score. The occurrence of vomiting will be recorded as a binary (yes/no) variable.

    Measured: At 2 hours post-treatment, at 6 hours post-treatment, at 12 hours post-treatment and at 24 hours post-treatment.

  3. Patient Satisfaction

    Patient satisfaction with the pain management method is assessed using a standardized questionnaire, which includes questions about their perceived level of pain control, comfort with the analgesic technique, and their willingness to choose the same method again in the future, measured by a likert scale score (e.g. 1=Strongly Disagree, 5=Strongly Agree).

    Measured: At 48 hours post-treatment.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Jan 2025
  2. Study start20 Jan 2025 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion1 May 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completion10 May 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
150 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06779968
Sponsor's protocol ID
2024-MER-317
Status last verified
Jan 2025
First submitted
14 Jan 2025
Last updated
17 Jan 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
Yes: All IPD that underlie results in a publication.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Femoral Nerve Block, Combined Sciatic and Femoral Nerve Block and Lumbar plexus block in people with Lower Limb Injury, run by Xiaguang Duan at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Jan 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Xiaguang Duan, Master's degree (+86 13314720012, alonlord2023@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Numerical Rating Scale(NRS) (time frame: At baseline (before therapy), at 2 hours post-treatment, at 6 hours post-treatment, at 12 hours post-treatment, and at 24 hours post-treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Jan 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in