AzTrials
AzTrials

Cognitive FrailtyNCT06797440

The Effect of Dual Tasks of Digital Technology on Cognitive Function and Physical Activity in the Older Adults With Cognitive Frailty

A study testing Dual tasks of digital technology in people with Cognitive Frailty, run by National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences at 1 site in Taiwan.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Background: Cognitive frailty is a state that combines physical weakness and cognitive impairment. As age increases, the prevalence rate also increases. Older adults with cognitive frailty are prone to falls, limited or degraded physical functions, and are at high risk of becoming disabled. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 65 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Cognitive Frailty
What is being tested?
Dual tasks of digital technology
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteTaiwan
Study dates
30 Apr 2025to 30 Jun 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 65 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Aged 65 years or older
  • Subjective cognitive decline (measured by SMC with a score of at least 1 point) or mild cognitive impairment (measured by MoCA-T with a score of ≤25 points)
  • Possessing characteristics of physiological frailty (meeting at least one of the above items as measured by FFI)

Who cannot join

  • Diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease or other types of dementia
  • Suffering from musculoskeletal diseases and severe mental illness that make it impossible to perform cognitive and motor tasks

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Chiung Shu Lee, PhD Candidate contact

886925887091

doreen79@ctcn.edu.tw

Taiwan1 site
  • National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences

    Taipei, 112303

    Chia-Jung Hsieh, PhD, 886(2)2822-7101 ext. 3135, chiajung@gm.ntunhs.edu.tw

    Chiung Shu Lee, PhD Candidate, 886925887091, doreen79@ctcn.edu.tw

Other trials in Taiwan

About this study

Official title: The Effect of Dual Tasks of Digital Technology on Cognitive Function and Physical Activity in the Older Adults With Cognitive Frailty - A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background: Cognitive frailty is a state that combines physical weakness and cognitive impairment. As age increases, the prevalence rate also increases. Older adults with cognitive frailty are prone to falls, limited or degraded physical functions, and are at high risk of becoming disabled. It is an essential predictor of dementia and mortality. There are currently very few randomized controlled trial studies on cognitive frailty abroad. Although there are many related studies on senile frailty in Taiwan, most studies examine cognitive function and physical frailty separately. Since cognitive frailty is reversible, early intervention can delay or prevent the occurrence of cognitive frailty. Therefore, cognitive-motor dual tasks are introduced. For more information, see the effectiveness of dual-tasking in cases of cognitive decline.

Purpose: Goal is to not only explore the feasibility of a motor-cognition dual-task program for elderly individuals with cognitive frailty but also to compare its impact on cognitive and physical function with existing training programs. By doing so, the purpose of this study will be to provide practical insights that can inform the development of effective interventions for this vulnerable population.

Read more

Methods: A randomized clinical trial was used to explore the effectiveness of a dual-task intervention program on cognitive function and physical activity in older adults with cognitive frailty. Eligible subjects were recruited through convenience sampling and randomly assigned to two groups. The experimental group used Nintendo Switch to perform dual tasks of motor cognition, while the control group performed regular activities. Twice a week, 60 minutes each time, for eight weeks of training. Both groups completed basic information (demographics, disease characteristics, and lifestyle), cognitive function measurements, and physical activity function measurements in the pre-test (T0) in the 4th week (T1) and 8th week (T2). Cognitive function measurements and physical activity function measurements were performed again. Using SPSS 29.0 as a statistical tool, independent sample t-test and Chi-square test were used to detect the demographic variables, disease treatment variables, living habits, cognitive functions, and physical effects of the two groups-homogeneity of activities. A generalized estimating equation (GEE) was used as a statistical method to process and analyze repeated measurement data. The effects of the inter-group and time interaction on the two groups' cognitive function and physical activity were studied differently.

Expected research results: This study is expected to construct a suitable dual-task program to introduce the role of physical and cognitive function in this group and explore its effectiveness.

Read the detailed description

Background:

As the population ages, the number of diseases or problems related to old adults is also increasing, among which the problem of frailty is also rising sharply. Scholars define frailty as multiple declines in physiological systems, which lead to the deterioration of body reserve functions, increase the susceptibility to clinical symptoms, and reduce The ability to cope with acute stress, leading to related complications and adverse health outcomes, such as falls, decreased physical activity, cognitive decline, and increased mortality. Scholars van Oostrom et al. classified frailty into four types: physical frailty, psychological frailty, cognitive frailty, and social frailty. They also verified that sociodemographic factors, lifestyle, and multiple diseases affect the four types of frailty . In Taiwan, most frailty research focuses on the physiological aspects. Cognitive impairment and physical frailty are common health problems in the elderly, and the relationship between the two has been widely discussed. Many studies have confirmed that physical activity can not only reduce the occurrence of cognitive impairment but also is an important factor in reducing physiological frailty. The main reason is that physical activity can stimulate endothelial function and cell molecules in series, producing a protective mechanism to fight against cognitive decline and muscle loss. However, even though frailty and cognitive impairment are linked, the two conditions are often studied separately.

In recent years, domestic and foreign scholars have begun to realize the issues related to cognitive frailty (CF) and have begun to explore its prevalence, related influencing factors, influencing results, and intervention measures. According to the literature, the prevalence of cognitive frailty has increased significantly in recent years. The prevalence of cognitive impairment among community-dwelling older adults is 9% on average, with a prevalence of 13.3% in Taiwan. This increase in data is of great significance for the adjustment of health policies, nursing, and long-term care development. Literature shows that cognitive decline is a reversible state. If pay attention to this problem and start taking relevant intervention measures, we can avoid its rapid development.

The concept and assessment of cognitive decline in the elderly have been embryonic for the past five years. Conceptual definitions have been developed abroad. In recent years, many empirical studies have been conducted, most of which focus on longitudinal studies and dual-task intervention programs to verify the effects of cognitive function and physical activity on patients with cognitive impairment, but there is still a lack of randomized controlled trials. Although there are many studies on frailty in old adults in Taiwan, most of them are still Cognitive function, and physical frailty has been studied separately, and there are few studies on the topic of cognitive frailty. Therefore, this study introduced the cognitive-motor dual task of digital technology to understand the effectiveness of the dual task in cases of cognitive impairment.

Purpose:

  1. Develop dual-task intervention solutions for digital technology.
  2. To explore the effectiveness of dual-task intervention programs on cognitive function in older adults with cognitive impairment.
  3. To explore the effectiveness of a dual-task intervention program on physical activity in cognitively impaired older adults.

Subjects:

  1. Inclusion criteria: (1) aged 65 years or older; (2) subjective cognitive decline (measured by SMC with a score of at least 1 point) or mild cognitive impairment (measured by MoCA-T with a score of ≤25 points); (3) Possessing characteristics of physiological frailty (meeting at least one of the above items as measured by FFI).
  2. Exclusion criteria: (1) diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease or other types of dementia; (2) suffering from musculoskeletal diseases and severe mental illness that make it impossible to perform cognitive and motor tasks.
  3. Number of subjects: 50 in the experimental group and 50 in the control group
  4. Recruitment method: (1) Recruitment location: residential institutions and senior citizen apartments in Taipei and New Taipei City (2) Recruitment through information sessions (with promotional posters)

Research design:

  1. Study design or implementation This study used a randomized clinical trial to explore the effectiveness of a dual-task intervention program on cognitive function and physical activity in cognitively impaired older adults. This study was a single-blind, parallel randomized design, and the intervention began immediately after the initial evaluation and randomization. Eligible subjects were recruited by convenience sampling and subsequently randomly assigned to two groups: the experimental group received the dual-task regimen, and the control group received conventional care. The intervention activities of this study were cognitive and physical activity training using Nintendo Switch twice a week, 60 minutes each time (5 minutes of warm-up and cool-down exercises, 10 minutes of stretching exercises, and 40 minutes of exercise combined with cognitive training) for a total of 8 weeks. train. Both groups completed basic information (demographics and disease characteristics). They underwent cognitive function measurement at the pretest (T0), 4th week (T1), and 8th week (T2): the Taiwanese version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment ( Taiwanese version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA-T), Trail Making Test (TMT), Taiwan Odd-Even Number Sequencing Test (TOENS); Physical activity function measurement: Timed Up and Test (Timed Up and Go, TUG), simple body measurement tool (Short Physical Performance Battery, SPPB) and handgrip strength test.
  2. Project duration and expected progress (1) This study was conducted after IRB and RCT were approved. (2) The case will be accepted after approval by both IRB and RCT. (3) Conduct data analysis and statistics after receiving the case 3. Statistical methods and results evaluation
  3. Descriptive data analysis ①. Describe various demographic variables with frequency and percentage, including gender, marital status, education level, employment, living alone, economic status, chronic diseases, depression, dental and chewing function, medication use, physical activity (leisure sports), and Participation in social activities. ②. Describe continuous variables using mean, standard deviation, minimum, maximum, and range, including age, BMI, duration of illness, and medication use.
  4. Inferential Data Analysis This study used an independent sample t-test and Chi-square test to detect the homogeneity of the two groups in terms of demographic variables, disease treatment variables, lifestyle habits, cognitive function, and physical activity. Since this study adopts a two-group (one before and two after) repeated measurement design, the generalized estimating equation (GEE) is used to handle repeated measurement data. Its advantages are that it allows the existence of missing values and assumes that Missing entirely at random (MACR) has the advantage of robust standard error and can handle continuous or binary variables. Therefore, GEE was used to analyze the intergroup effects of the two groups after dual-task intervention. And differences in the impact of between-group and time interactions.
Being tested
Dual tasks of digital technology
Keywords
Cognitive Frailty, Dual task, Digital technology, Nintendo Switch, Physical activity, Cognition funtion
Medical subject headings
Motor Activity

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Dual tasks of digital technologyOther

    The intervention activities of this study were cognitive and physical activity training using Nintendo Switch twice a week, 60 minutes each time (5 minutes of warm-up and cool-down exercises, 10 minutes of stretching exercises, and 40 minutes of exercise combined with cognitive training) for a total of 8 weeks. train. Both groups filled in basic data (demographics and disease characteristics) and underwent cognitive function measurements and physical activity function measurements at pretest (T0), 4th week (T1), and 8th week (T2).

Study groups in NCT06797440
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Experimental groupExperimentalThe experimental group received a dual-task protocol. The intervention activities of the experimental group were cognitive and physical activity training using Nitendo Switch.
Receives: Other: Dual tasks of digital technology
Control groupNo interventionThe control group received usual care.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Taiwanese version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA-T)

    This scale is used to assess the cognition funtion. The internal consistency Cronbach's coefficient of this tool is 0.83 and the test-retest reliability is 0.92.

    Measured: Baseline, pre-intervention (T0)

  2. Taiwanese version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA-T)

    This scale is used to assess the cognition funtion. The internal consistency Cronbach's coefficient of this tool is 0.83 and the test-retest reliability is 0.92.

    Measured: Four weeks after intervention(T1=4Weeks)

  3. Taiwanese version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA-T)

    This scale is used to assess the cognition funtion. The internal consistency Cronbach's coefficient of this tool is 0.83 and the test-retest reliability is 0.92.

    Measured: Eight weeks after intervention(T2=8Weeks)

  4. Taiwan Odd-Even Number Sequencing Test (TOENS)

    This scale is used to assess the cognition funtion. It's Half-reliability ranged from 0.69 to 0.95, and the test-retest reliability was 0.75.

    Measured: Baseline, pre-intervention (T0)

  5. Taiwan Odd-Even Number Sequencing Test (TOENS)

    This scale is used to assess the cognition funtion. It's Half-reliability ranged from 0.69 to 0.95, and the test-retest reliability was 0.75.

    Measured: Four weeks after intervention(T1=4Weeks)

  6. Taiwan Odd-Even Number Sequencing Test (TOENS)

    This scale is used to assess the cognition funtion. It's Half-reliability ranged from 0.69 to 0.95, and the test-retest reliability was 0.75.

    Measured: Eight weeks after intervention(T2=8Weeks)

  7. Trail Making Test (TMT)

    This scale is used to assess cognition function. The retest reliability of TMT-A is above 0.80 (0.60 ~0.90), and the retest reliability of TMT-B is 0.75

    Measured: Baseline, pre-intervention (T0)

  8. Trail Making Test (TMT)

    This scale is used to assess cognition function. The retest reliability of TMT-A is above 0.80 (0.60 ~0.90), and the retest reliability of TMT-B is 0.75

    Measured: Four weeks after intervention(T1=4Weeks)

  9. Trail Making Test (TMT)

    This scale is used to assess cognition function. The retest reliability of TMT-A is above 0.80 (0.60 ~0.90), and the retest reliability of TMT-B is 0.75

    Measured: Eight weeks after intervention(T2=8Weeks)

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. Timed Up and Go (TUG)

    This tool is used to assess physical activity function. The reliability of the tool is 0.96

    Measured: Baseline, pre-intervention (T0)

  2. Timed Up and Go (TUG)

    This tool is used to assess physical activity function. The reliability of the tool is 0.96

    Measured: Four weeks after intervention(T1=4Weeks)

  3. Timed Up and Go (TUG)

    This tool is used to assess physical activity function. The reliability of the tool is 0.96

    Measured: Eight weeks after intervention

  4. Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)

    This tool is used to assess physical activity function. The test-retest reliability of the SPPB was good: 0.87 (CI 95%: 0.77-0.96)

    Measured: Baseline, pre-intervention (T0)

  5. Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)

    This tool is used to assess physical activity function. The test-retest reliability of the SPPB was good: 0.87 (CI 95%: 0.77-0.96)

    Measured: Four weeks after intervention(T1=4Weeks)

  6. Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)

    This tool is used to assess physical activity function. The test-retest reliability of the SPPB was good: 0.87 (CI 95%: 0.77-0.96)

    Measured: Eight weeks after intervention

  7. Handgrip strength test

    This tool is used to assess physical activity function. This tool has been shown to be effective in research.

    Measured: Baseline, pre-intervention (T0)

  8. Handgrip strength test

    This tool is used to assess physical activity function. This tool has been shown to be effective in research.

    Measured: Four weeks after intervention(T1=4Weeks)

  9. Handgrip strength test

    This tool is used to assess physical activity function. This tool has been shown to be effective in research.

    Measured: Eight weeks after intervention(T2=8Weeks)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Jan 2025
  2. Study start30 Apr 2025 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion30 Apr 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Jun 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
100 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06797440
Sponsor's protocol ID
C113026
Status last verified
Mar 2025
First submitted
21 Jan 2025
Last updated
3 Apr 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Ruan Q, Yu Z, Chen M, Bao Z, Li J, He W. Cognitive frailty, a novel target for the prevention of elderly dependency. Ageing Res Rev. 2015 Mar;20:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2014.12.004. Epub 2014 Dec 30.

    PubMed 25555677
  • Qiu Y, Li G, Wang X, Zheng L, Wang C, Wang C, Chen L. Prevalence of cognitive frailty among community-dwelling older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Stud. 2022 Jan;125:104112. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.104112. Epub 2021 Oct 18.

    PubMed 34758429
  • van Oostrom SH, van der A DL, Rietman ML, Picavet HSJ, Lette M, Verschuren WMM, de Bruin SR, Spijkerman AMW. A four-domain approach of frailty explored in the Doetinchem Cohort Study. BMC Geriatr. 2017 Aug 30;17(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0595-0.

    PubMed 28854882
  • Mantovani E, Zucchella C, Schena F, Romanelli MG, Venturelli M, Tamburin S. Towards a Redefinition of Cognitive Frailty. J Alzheimers Dis. 2020;76(3):831-843. doi: 10.3233/JAD-200137.

    PubMed 32568197
  • Lauretani F, Longobucco Y, Ferrari Pellegrini F, De Iorio AM, Fazio C, Federici R, Gallini E, La Porta U, Ravazzoni G, Roberti MF, Salvi M, Zucchini I, Pela G, Maggio M. Comprehensive Model for Physical and Cognitive Frailty: Current Organization and Unmet Needs. Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 26;11:569629. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.569629. eCollection 2020.

    PubMed 33324282
  • Kwan RYC, Liu JYW, Fong KNK, Qin J, Leung PK, Sin OSK, Hon PY, Suen LW, Tse MK, Lai CK. Feasibility and Effects of Virtual Reality Motor-Cognitive Training in Community-Dwelling Older People With Cognitive Frailty: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Serious Games. 2021 Aug 6;9(3):e28400. doi: 10.2196/28400.

    PubMed 34383662
  • Kwan RY, Lee D, Lee PH, Tse M, Cheung DS, Thiamwong L, Choi KS. Effects of an mHealth Brisk Walking Intervention on Increasing Physical Activity in Older People With Cognitive Frailty: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Jul 31;8(7):e16596. doi: 10.2196/16596.

    PubMed 32735218
  • Kelaiditi E, Cesari M, Canevelli M, van Kan GA, Ousset PJ, Gillette-Guyonnet S, Ritz P, Duveau F, Soto ME, Provencher V, Nourhashemi F, Salva A, Robert P, Andrieu S, Rolland Y, Touchon J, Fitten JL, Vellas B; IANA/IAGG. Cognitive frailty: rational and definition from an (I.A.N.A./I.A.G.G.) international consensus group. J Nutr Health Aging. 2013 Sep;17(9):726-34. doi: 10.1007/s12603-013-0367-2.

    PubMed 24154642
  • Junius-Walker U, Onder G, Soleymani D, Wiese B, Albaina O, Bernabei R, Marzetti E; ADVANTAGE JA WP4 group. The essence of frailty: A systematic review and qualitative synthesis on frailty concepts and definitions. Eur J Intern Med. 2018 Oct;56:3-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2018.04.023. Epub 2018 May 31.

    PubMed 29861330
  • Jiayuan Z, Xiang-Zi J, Li-Na M, Jin-Wei Y, Xue Y. Effects of Mindfulness-Based Tai Chi Chuan on Physical Performance and Cognitive Function among Cognitive Frailty Older Adults: A Six-Month Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2022;9(1):104-112. doi: 10.14283/jpad.2021.40.

    PubMed 35098980

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Dual tasks of digital technology in people with Cognitive Frailty, run by National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences at 1 site in Taiwan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Apr 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Chia-Jung Hsieh, PhD (886(2)2822-7101 ext. 3135, chiajung@gm.ntunhs.edu.tw), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Taiwanese version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA-T) (time frame: Baseline, pre-intervention (T0)). The study lists 9 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06797440, which also lists 10 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Apr 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in