Liver TransplantationNCT06804746
DCN for ECD Livers
An observational study of Liver Transplantation, run by Erasmus Medical Center at 2 sites in Netherlands.
Trial summary
The goal of this observational study is to learn whether extended criteria donor livers can be safely transplanted after sequential hypo- and normothermic machine perfusion in recipients requiring a liver transplant for end-stage liver disease, including a long-term follow-up. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Liver Transplantation
- What is being tested?
- DHOPE-COR-NMP
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 143 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesNetherlands
- Study dates
- 1 Mar 2019to 31 Oct 2025
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Adult patients (>18 years) undergoing liver transplantation of extended criteria donor livers, which therefore required resuscitation and viability assessment through the previously published DHOPE-COR-NMP protocol based on a blood-based perfusate.
Who may be able to join
- Adult patients (>18 years old)
- Donor livers that required resuscitation and viability assessment through the previously published sequential hypo- and normothermic liver machine perfusion (DHOPE-COR-NMP) protocol based on a blood-based perfusate.
Who cannot join
- Multiorgan transplantation
- Split liver transplant
- Living donor liver transplantation
- Previous donor organ perfusion (e.g. Normothermic Regional Perfusion)
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
Netherlands2 sites
University Medical Center Groningen
Groningen, Provincie Groningen, 9713GZ
Erasmus Medical Center
Rotterdam, South Holland, 3015GD
About this study
Official title: Safe Transplantation of Extended Criteria Donor Livers: Two-center Experience With Resuscitation and Viability Assessment of 206 Livers Using Sequential Hypo- and Normothermic Machine Perfusion
The goal of this observational study is to learn whether extended criteria donor livers can be safely transplanted after sequential hypo- and normothermic machine perfusion in recipients requiring a liver transplant for end-stage liver disease, including a long-term follow-up. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Death censored graft-survival
- Overall patient survival
- Frequency of frequent post-transplant complications (e.g. non-anastomotic biliary strictures)
Read the detailed description
With the increasing shortage of suitable donor livers for transplantation, extended criteria donor (ECD) livers may bridge the gap between available donor organs and donor livers needed. However, these ECD livers are associated with a higher risk of posttransplant complications. With the development of machine perfusion (MP) strategies over the recent years, (dual) hypothermic oxygenated perfusion ((D)HOPE) is established as a safe and effective way to reduce ischemia reperfusion injury. This leads to a decrease in early allograft dysfunction and non-anastomotic biliary strictures (NAS). On the other hand, normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) is mainly used for hepatobiliary functional assessment of liver grafts prior to transplantation. Combining both perfusion techniques through 1 hour of controlled oxygenated rewarming (COR), enables safe selection and transplantation of ECD livers after DHOPE-COR-NMP. Long-term outcomes are now available from two centers.
- Conditions
- Liver Transplantation
- Being tested
- DHOPE-COR-NMP
- Keywords
- Liver Transplantation, Machine Perfusion, Extended Criteria Donors
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
DHOPE-COR-NMPProcedure or surgery
Resuscitation and viability assessment through the previously published protocol of sequential hypo- and normothermic liver machine perfusion with controlled oxygenated rewarming (DHOPE-COR-NMP) based on a blood-based perfusate.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | Adult patients (>18 years) who underwent liver transplantation of donor livers that required resuscitation and viability assessment through the previously published protocol for sequential hypo- and normothermic liver machine perfusion with controlled oxygenated rewarming (DHOPE-COR-NMP) based on a blood-based perfusate. Receives: Procedure: DHOPE-COR-NMP |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Death-censored graft survival
Time from liver transplantation until re-transplantation or death due to graft dysfunction, with censoring of subjects who died with a functioning graft.
Measured: 1 year post-transplant
Secondary outcomes (12)
Overall patient survival
Time from liver transplantation until all-cause death
Measured: 1 year post-transplant
• Overall graft survival
Time from liver transplantation until re-transplantation or all-cause death.
Measured: 1 year post-transplant
Number of participants with primary non function
Livers failing to sustain their primary function, leading to death or re-transplantation within 7 days of the primary procedure, in the presence of patent blood supply and outflow (8).
Measured: From transplantation until 7 days post-transplant
Occurrence of hepatic arterial thrombosis
Radiologically or surgically proven thrombosis of the hepatic artery.
Measured: 1 year post-transplant
Occurrence of portal vein thrombosis
Radiologically or surgically proven thrombosis of the portal vein.
Measured: 1 year post-transplant
Occurrence of venous outflow tract obstruction
Radiologically or surgically proven thrombosis of the main hepatic veins or the inferior vena cava.
Measured: 1 year post-transplant
Occurrence of non-anastomotic biliary strictures
Any irregularity or narrowing of the lumen of the intrahepatic or extrahepatic donor bile ducts, excluding the biliary anastomosis, diagnosed with the use of cholangiography in combination with clinical symptoms (e.g., jaundice or cholangitis) or an elevation of cholestatic laboratory variables, in the presence of a patent hepatic artery (5).
Measured: 1 year post-transplant
Occurrence of anastomotic biliary strictures
Strictures occurring at the anastomosis of donor choledochal duct and recipient choledochal duct or jejunal Roux-limb.
Measured: 1 year post-transplant
Occurrence of biliary leakage
Fluid with an elevated (>3x serum) bilirubin level in the abdominal drain or intra-abdominal fluid on or after post-operative day 3 or the need for radiological intervention (i.e. interventional drainage) owing to biliary collections or re-laparotomy due to biliary peritonitis (9).
Measured: From 3 days after transplantation until the the first year post-transplant
Biliary complications: as a composite
A composite of individually studied outcome measures (reported as one single outcome measure), composed of: non-anastomotic biliary strictures, anastomotic biliary strictures and biliary leakage.
Measured: 1 year post-transplant
Intensive care stay
Intensive care stay post-transplantation
Measured: From transplantation until discharge from the Intensive care unit to the ward after transplantation or date of death from any cause during initial admission, whichever came first, assessed up to 6 months
Total hospital stay
Defined as total hospital stay from transplantation until discharge, including intensive care unit stay
Measured: From transplantation until discharge after transplantation, or date of death from any cause during initial admission, whichever came first, assessed up to 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Feb 2025
- Study start1 Mar 2019
- Primary completion1 May 2025
- Study completion31 Oct 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Liver TransplantationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Erasmus Medical CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 143 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Erasmus Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University Medical Center Groningen
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Prof. Robert J. Porte, Erasmus Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06804746
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MEC-2024-0738
- Status last verified
- Jan 2026
- First submitted
- 13 Jan 2025
- Last updated
- 27 Jan 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
de Vries Y, Berendsen TA, Fujiyoshi M, van den Berg AP, Blokzijl H, de Boer MT, van der Heide F, de Kleine RHJ, van Leeuwen OB, Matton APM, Werner MJM, Lisman T, de Meijer VE, Porte R. Transplantation of high-risk donor livers after resuscitation and viability assessment using a combined protocol of oxygenated hypothermic, rewarming and normothermic machine perfusion: study protocol for a prospective, single-arm study (DHOPE-COR-NMP trial). BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 15;9(8):e028596. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028596.
PubMed 31420387van Leeuwen OB, de Vries Y, Fujiyoshi M, Nijsten MWN, Ubbink R, Pelgrim GJ, Werner MJM, Reyntjens KMEM, van den Berg AP, de Boer MT, de Kleine RHJ, Lisman T, de Meijer VE, Porte RJ. Transplantation of High-risk Donor Livers After Ex Situ Resuscitation and Assessment Using Combined Hypo- and Normothermic Machine Perfusion: A Prospective Clinical Trial. Ann Surg. 2019 Nov;270(5):906-914. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003540.
PubMed 31633615van Rijn R, Schurink IJ, de Vries Y, van den Berg AP, Cortes Cerisuelo M, Darwish Murad S, Erdmann JI, Gilbo N, de Haas RJ, Heaton N, van Hoek B, Huurman VAL, Jochmans I, van Leeuwen OB, de Meijer VE, Monbaliu D, Polak WG, Slangen JJG, Troisi RI, Vanlander A, de Jonge J, Porte RJ; DHOPE-DCD Trial Investigators. Hypothermic Machine Perfusion in Liver Transplantation - A Randomized Trial. N Engl J Med. 2021 Apr 15;384(15):1391-1401. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2031532. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
PubMed 33626248Eden J, Bruggenwirth IMA, Berlakovich G, Buchholz BM, Botea F, Camagni S, Cescon M, Cillo U, Colli F, Compagnon P, De Carlis LG, De Carlis R, Di Benedetto F, Dingfelder J, Diogo D, Dondossola D, Drefs M, Fronek J, Germinario G, Gringeri E, Gyori G, Kocik M, Kucukerbil EH, Koliogiannis D, Lam HD, Lurje G, Magistri P, Monbaliu D, Moumni ME, Patrono D, Polak WG, Ravaioli M, Rayar M, Romagnoli R, Sorensen G, Uluk D, Schlegel A, Porte RJ, Dutkowski P, de Meijer VE. Long-term outcomes after hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion and transplantation of 1,202 donor livers in a real-world setting (HOPE-REAL study). J Hepatol. 2025 Jan;82(1):97-106. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2024.06.035. Epub 2024 Jul 3.
PubMed 38969242Schlegel A, Porte R, Dutkowski P. Protective mechanisms and current clinical evidence of hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion (HOPE) in preventing post-transplant cholangiopathy. J Hepatol. 2022 Jun;76(6):1330-1347. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2022.01.024.
PubMed 35589254Foley DP, Fernandez LA, Leverson G, Anderson M, Mezrich J, Sollinger HW, D'Alessandro A. Biliary complications after liver transplantation from donation after cardiac death donors: an analysis of risk factors and long-term outcomes from a single center. Ann Surg. 2011 Apr;253(4):817-25. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182104784.
PubMed 21475025Nemes B, Gaman G, Polak WG, Gelley F, Hara T, Ono S, Baimakhanov Z, Piros L, Eguchi S. Extended-criteria donors in liver transplantation Part II: reviewing the impact of extended-criteria donors on the complications and outcomes of liver transplantation. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Jul;10(7):841-59. doi: 10.1586/17474124.2016.1149062. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
PubMed 26831547
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Jan 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Safe Transplantation of Extended Criteria Donor Livers: Two-center Experience With Resuscitation and Viability Assessment of 206 Livers Using Sequential Hypo- and Normothermic Machine Perfusion
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06804746
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MEC-2024-0738
- Conditions
- Liver Transplantation
- Keywords
- Liver Transplantation, Machine Perfusion, Extended Criteria Donors
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 143 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Erasmus Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University Medical Center Groningen
- Study start
- 1 Mar 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 May 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Oct 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 3 Feb 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this observational study is to learn whether extended criteria donor livers can be safely transplanted after sequential hypo- and normothermic machine perfusion in recipients requiring a liver transplant for end-stage liver disease, including a long-term follow-up. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Death censored graft-survival
- Overall patient survival
- Frequency of frequent post-transplant complications (e.g. non-anastomotic biliary strictures)
Detailed description
With the increasing shortage of suitable donor livers for transplantation, extended criteria donor (ECD) livers may bridge the gap between available donor organs and donor livers needed. However, these ECD livers are associated with a higher risk of posttransplant complications. With the development of machine perfusion (MP) strategies over the recent years, (dual) hypothermic oxygenated perfusion ((D)HOPE) is established as a safe and effective way to reduce ischemia reperfusion injury. This leads to a decrease in early allograft dysfunction and non-anastomotic biliary strictures (NAS). On the other hand, normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) is mainly used for hepatobiliary functional assessment of liver grafts prior to transplantation. Combining both perfusion techniques through 1 hour of controlled oxygenated rewarming (COR), enables safe selection and transplantation of ECD livers after DHOPE-COR-NMP. Long-term outcomes are now available from two centers.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | – | Procedure: DHOPE-COR-NMPAdult patients (>18 years) who underwent liver transplantation of donor livers that required resuscitation and viability assessment through the previously published protocol for sequential hypo- and normothermic liver machine perfusion with controlled oxygenated rewarming (DHOPE-COR-NMP) based on a blood-based perfusate. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Adult patients (>18 years) undergoing liver transplantation of extended criteria donor livers, which therefore required resuscitation and viability assessment through the previously published DHOPE-COR-NMP protocol based on a blood-based perfusate.
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Adult patients (>18 years old)
- Donor livers that required resuscitation and viability assessment through the previously published sequential hypo- and normothermic liver machine perfusion (DHOPE-COR-NMP) protocol based on a blood-based perfusate.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Multiorgan transplantation
- Split liver transplant
- Living donor liver transplantation
- Previous donor organ perfusion (e.g. Normothermic Regional Perfusion)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| DHOPE-COR-NMPResuscitation and viability assessment through the previously published protocol of sequential hypo- and normothermic liver machine perfusion with controlled oxygenated rewarming (DHOPE-COR-NMP) based on a blood-based perfusate. | Procedure or surgery | Group 1 |
Primary outcome
Death-censored graft survival
Time frame: 1 year post-transplant
Time from liver transplantation until re-transplantation or death due to graft dysfunction, with censoring of subjects who died with a functioning graft.
12 secondary outcomes
Overall patient survival
Time frame: 1 year post-transplant
• Overall graft survival
Time frame: 1 year post-transplant
Number of participants with primary non function
Time frame: From transplantation until 7 days post-transplant
Occurrence of hepatic arterial thrombosis
Time frame: 1 year post-transplant
Occurrence of portal vein thrombosis
Time frame: 1 year post-transplant
Occurrence of venous outflow tract obstruction
Time frame: 1 year post-transplant
Occurrence of non-anastomotic biliary strictures
Time frame: 1 year post-transplant
Occurrence of anastomotic biliary strictures
Time frame: 1 year post-transplant
Occurrence of biliary leakage
Time frame: From 3 days after transplantation until the the first year post-transplant
Biliary complications: as a composite
Time frame: 1 year post-transplant
Intensive care stay
Time frame: From transplantation until discharge from the Intensive care unit to the ward after transplantation or date of death from any cause during initial admission, whichever came first, assessed up to 6 months
Total hospital stay
Time frame: From transplantation until discharge after transplantation, or date of death from any cause during initial admission, whichever came first, assessed up to 6 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Jan 2026.
- Background: PubMed 31420387de Vries Y, Berendsen TA, Fujiyoshi M, van den Berg AP, Blokzijl H, de Boer MT, van der Heide F, de Kleine RHJ, van Leeuwen OB, Matton APM, Werner MJM, Lisman T, de Meijer VE, Porte R. Transplantation of high-risk donor livers after resuscitation and viability assessment using a combined protocol of oxygenated hypothermic, rewarming and normothermic machine perfusion: study protocol for a prospective, single-arm study (DHOPE-COR-NMP trial). BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 15;9(8):e028596. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028596.
- Background: PubMed 31633615van Leeuwen OB, de Vries Y, Fujiyoshi M, Nijsten MWN, Ubbink R, Pelgrim GJ, Werner MJM, Reyntjens KMEM, van den Berg AP, de Boer MT, de Kleine RHJ, Lisman T, de Meijer VE, Porte RJ. Transplantation of High-risk Donor Livers After Ex Situ Resuscitation and Assessment Using Combined Hypo- and Normothermic Machine Perfusion: A Prospective Clinical Trial. Ann Surg. 2019 Nov;270(5):906-914. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003540.
- Background: PubMed 33626248van Rijn R, Schurink IJ, de Vries Y, van den Berg AP, Cortes Cerisuelo M, Darwish Murad S, Erdmann JI, Gilbo N, de Haas RJ, Heaton N, van Hoek B, Huurman VAL, Jochmans I, van Leeuwen OB, de Meijer VE, Monbaliu D, Polak WG, Slangen JJG, Troisi RI, Vanlander A, de Jonge J, Porte RJ; DHOPE-DCD Trial Investigators. Hypothermic Machine Perfusion in Liver Transplantation - A Randomized Trial. N Engl J Med. 2021 Apr 15;384(15):1391-1401. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2031532. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
- Background: PubMed 38969242Eden J, Bruggenwirth IMA, Berlakovich G, Buchholz BM, Botea F, Camagni S, Cescon M, Cillo U, Colli F, Compagnon P, De Carlis LG, De Carlis R, Di Benedetto F, Dingfelder J, Diogo D, Dondossola D, Drefs M, Fronek J, Germinario G, Gringeri E, Gyori G, Kocik M, Kucukerbil EH, Koliogiannis D, Lam HD, Lurje G, Magistri P, Monbaliu D, Moumni ME, Patrono D, Polak WG, Ravaioli M, Rayar M, Romagnoli R, Sorensen G, Uluk D, Schlegel A, Porte RJ, Dutkowski P, de Meijer VE. Long-term outcomes after hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion and transplantation of 1,202 donor livers in a real-world setting (HOPE-REAL study). J Hepatol. 2025 Jan;82(1):97-106. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2024.06.035. Epub 2024 Jul 3.
- Background: PubMed 35589254Schlegel A, Porte R, Dutkowski P. Protective mechanisms and current clinical evidence of hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion (HOPE) in preventing post-transplant cholangiopathy. J Hepatol. 2022 Jun;76(6):1330-1347. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2022.01.024.
- Background: PubMed 21475025Foley DP, Fernandez LA, Leverson G, Anderson M, Mezrich J, Sollinger HW, D'Alessandro A. Biliary complications after liver transplantation from donation after cardiac death donors: an analysis of risk factors and long-term outcomes from a single center. Ann Surg. 2011 Apr;253(4):817-25. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182104784.
- Background: PubMed 26831547Nemes B, Gaman G, Polak WG, Gelley F, Hara T, Ono S, Baimakhanov Z, Piros L, Eguchi S. Extended-criteria donors in liver transplantation Part II: reviewing the impact of extended-criteria donors on the complications and outcomes of liver transplantation. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Jul;10(7):841-59. doi: 10.1586/17474124.2016.1149062. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Liver Transplantation
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Comparison of Liver Biopsy Versus Fibroscan With CAP ( Controlled Attenuation Parameter) in Donors Evaluation for Liver Transplant
Non-invasive Donor Liver Assessment
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Prevalence and Development of Liver Dysfunction in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant
Recruiting
In-situ vs Ex-situ Liver Preservation
Liver Disease (Alcoholic or Not), Transplantation
Active, not recruiting
Leveraging Technology to Improve Medication Adherence in Youth With Kidney or Liver Transplant
Transplant;Failure,Kidney, Transplant; Failure, Liver
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
A Prospective Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Entecavir ODT Conversion in Stable Liver Transplant Patients
Hepatitis B Virus, Liver Transplant
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Liver Transplantation, run by Erasmus Medical Center at 2 sites in Netherlands.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Death-censored graft survival (time frame: 1 year post-transplant). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06804746, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Jan 2026.