AzTrials
AzTrials

Catheter BlockageCASSETTENCT06815120

A Novel Ureteric Stent in Kidney Stone Patients and Oncology Patients Compared to a Conventional JJ Stent

A study testing Experimental ureteric stent with specially shaped side-holes that prevent stagnation points (i.e., areas of low flow that cause particles to settle and E&B) and Qualitative interview in people with Catheter Blockage and Oncology, run by University of Southampton at 2 sites in United Kingdom.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Urological stents and catheters often lead to inflammation, causing pain and infection in the urinary tract. Moreover, 80% of stents are associated with pain, negatively impacting on QoL and mental health. Offering novel designs with significantly lower E\&B leads to a reduction in UTIs and improves QoL. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 99 years
Conditions the study is for
Catheter Blockage, Oncology, Kidney Stone
What is being tested?
Experimental ureteric stent with specially shaped side-holes that prevent stagnation points (i.e., areas of low flow that cause particles to settle and E&B) and Qualitative interview
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
50 participants
Where
2 sitesUnited Kingdom
Study dates
6 Aug 2025to 31 Dec 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 99 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Aged 18 years or over
  • Ureteric stents clinically indicated either due to kidney stones or abdominal/pelvic cancers compressing ureters
  • Previous experience with ureteric stents
  • Awaiting insersion/replacement of stents
  • Ability to give consent
  • Ability to interact with study documentation
  • Sufficient English to complete study documentations and questionnaires

Who cannot join

  • Expected survival <4months
  • Unfit for stent insertion
  • Unable to comply with study processes Pregnancy

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Sophie Varkonyi-Clifford contact

02381203866

cassette@soton.ac.uk

United Kingdom2 sites, 2 recruiting
  • University College Hospital London

    London, London, W1G 8PH

    Daron Smith, 07929716429, daron.smith1@nhs.net

    Recruiting
  • University Hospital Southampton

    Southampton, England, SO16 6YD

    Bhaskar Sohani, 02381204911, bhaskar.somani@uhs.nsh.uk

    Recruiting

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: Two Single Arm, Multicentre Unblinded First-in-human Trials Investigating a Novel Ureteric Stent to Determine the Reduction of Encrustation, Biofilm Deposition and Complications Compared to a Conventional JJ Stent

Urological stents and catheters often lead to inflammation, causing pain and infection in the urinary tract. Moreover, 80% of stents are associated with pain, negatively impacting on QoL and mental health. Offering novel designs with significantly lower E\&B leads to a reduction in UTIs and improves QoL. Reducing hospital admissions (from 3 to 1 per patient, annually) would free >100,000 bed-nights, allowing the elderly to regain independence. Our proposed research could have a significant impact towards fulfilling the 'healthy-ageing' Grand Challenge. Additionally, the novel stent reduces prevalence of infections and therefore, of antibiotic prescriptions contributing to the Global AMR challenge.

Read the detailed description

Ureteric stents and catheters are deployed clinically as temporary measures to restore urinary drainage, in patients with kidney stones, tumours and strictures. Prevalence of these increases with age. Device-associated encrustation-and-biofilm-formation (E\&B) are key complications, leading to urinary-tract-infections (UTIs) in >90% of stents, causing stent blockage and favouring development of antibiotic resistance.

UTIs are a significant cause of morbidity, especially among the elderly population, with 4,835 deaths in England and Wales reported in 2012. The National Institute for Health Research reported that 1-3% of all primary care consultations concern UTI-related symptoms, leading to 13.7% of antibiotic prescriptions globally. The report also revealed that >92m people globally are diagnosed with UTIs annually.

Urological-device-associated infections significantly compromise patient' quality of life and the effectiveness of services, imposing a £2.5b annual burden on the NHS. Patients' exposure to hospital environment and general anaesthetic use impact on Quality-of-Life (QoL), resulting in unnecessary hospital bed-nights. A novel urological stent has been developed which is associated with significantly reduced particle deposition , potentially extending the stent's lifetime, resulting in reduced hospitalisation and improved QoL.

Urological stents and catheters often lead to inflammation, causing pain and infection in the urinary tract. Moreover, 80% of stents are associated with pain, negatively impacting on QoL and mental health. Offering novel designs with significantly lower E\&B leads to a reduction in UTIs and improves QoL. Reducing hospital admissions (from 3 to 1 per patient, annually) would free >100,000 bed-nights, allowing the elderly to regain independence. Our proposed research could have a significant impact towards fulfilling the 'healthy-ageing' Grand Challenge. Additionally, the novel stent reduces prevalence of infections and therefore, of antibiotic prescriptions contributing to the Global AMR challenge.

Considering only onco-urological patients, >30,000 stents are inserted every year across 200 NHS units. Due to stent failures, each patient undergoes 3 to 6 replacements, resulting in >90,000 stent replacements. Under the current tariff-based system, hospitals are paid for each intervention, costing the NHS >£3,500, bringing the total cost of replacements to ~£315m annually. Unnecessary replacements increase the number of bed-nights and use of anaesthetics. A longer-lasting stent means that each patient comes to the hospital ideally only once, reducing their exposure to the hospital environment and anaesthetic-associated risks. Additionally, under the current model hospitals would improve their quality of service and save at least 2 bed-nights per patient. The NHS is moving towards a "block contract" model, meaning that hospitals will receive a lump sum for the year and they'll regularly monitor budgets and improve cost efficiency where possible. Improved stents will allow the same urology budget to deliver more healthcare, reducing theatre time for stent insertion-and-replacement. This innovative stent design offers a potential annual saving of >£210m for the NHS, allowing hospitals to reallocate their resources. Today E\&B is still a major determinant of stent failure and associated side effects. The trial aims to address this challenge through the novel stent, and if equivalent safety and improved efficacy are demonstrated, anticipate market launch via third-party suppliers 2-3 years post project.

Solutions to break this pathway (stent presence >> inflammation, pain and infection) have been developed, including materials (e.g. metallic alloys, polymers, biodegradable and drug-eluting materials), coatings (e.g. heparin, chitosan, hydrogel, carbon) and shapes (e.g. double-J, loop, mesh, string, expandable) to improve the efficacy and safety of stents. Despite all these advances, there is still a significant prevalence of E\&B. This is also due to the lack of studies correlating fluid dynamic metrics with deposition of particles causing E\&B. The lead applicant's PhD investigated the mechanisms of particle deposition in urological stents, and successfully determined fluid dynamic parameters governing particle deposition on ureteric stents and catheters. The research led to developing a stent with specially shaped side-holes that prevent stagnation points (i.e., areas of low flow that cause particles to settle and E\&B). These developments demonstrated >80% reduction in particle deposition at side-holes, in-vitro. Their innovative architecture can be implemented on stents and catheters. The technology, including the stent design and manufacturing process, is protectable - Patent# WO2019048860A1, WIPO(PCT). These results were further validated in an animal study (6 pigs: 3 novel-design-stent vs 3 conventional-design-stent for a 4-weeks period) at Stone-Centre at Vancouver-General-Hospital (VGH), a centre of excellence in animal studies on urological products. The study (available upon request) concluded that the functionality of stents with novel side-holes is the same as that of standard stents in terms of safety. Specifically, the novel stent does not result in increased risk of irritation, inflammation and hydronephrosis. Furthermore, SEM/EDX imaging showed that the novel design decreased the build-up of particles on the stent surface. Thus, it demonstrated significant potential for the new side-hole configuration to change patterns of particle deposition on the stent's surface, decreasing encrustation

Being tested
Experimental ureteric stent with specially shaped side-holes that prevent stagnation points (i.e., areas of low flow that cause particles to settle and E&B), Qualitative interview
Medical subject headings
Neoplasms, Kidney Calculi

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Experimental ureteric stent with specially shaped side-holes that prevent stagnation points (i.e., areas of low flow that cause particles to settle and E&B)Device

    Kidney stone patients and Oncology patients admitted to either the University Hospital Southampton (UHS) or University College London Hospital (UCLH) for management of kidney stones or for the management of urine drainage in ureter will have a novel ureteric stent instead of their planned conventional stent. The novel stent will be removed after 4 weeks (kidney stone patients) or 25 weeks (oncology patients). Recruitment to the cohort of oncology patients will only commence once the results for kidney stones patients have been reviewed.

  • Qualitative interviewOther

    Kidney stone patients, Oncology patients and doctors will be interviewed about their experience of having a stent, or their experience in managing patients with a stent.

Study groups in NCT06815120
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Kidney Stone cohortExperimentalExperimental ureteric stent with specially shaped side-holes that prevent stagnation points (i.e., areas of low flow that cause particles to settle and E\&B)
Receives: Device: Experimental ureteric stent with specially shaped side-holes that prevent stagnation points (i.e., areas of low flow that cause particles to settle and E&B); Other: Qualitative interview
Oncology cohortExperimentalExperimental ureteric stent with specially shaped side-holes that prevent stagnation points (i.e., areas of low flow that cause particles to settle and E\&B)
Receives: Device: Experimental ureteric stent with specially shaped side-holes that prevent stagnation points (i.e., areas of low flow that cause particles to settle and E&B); Other: Qualitative interview

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. To determine rates of stent failure

    Outcome measure: Stent failure, defined as any of: a): a stent change earlier than planned (oncology only); b) need for additional surgical or radiological intervention; c): kidney failure (evidenced by acute kidney injury (AKI) on blood tests (eGFR or creatinine kidney function tests) and/or worsening hydronephrosis on imaging

    Summary method: Frequency and percentage of people experiencing any stent failure

    Measured: From enrolment to stent removal (4 weeks for Kidney cohort), (25 weeks for Oncology cohort)

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. To assess extent of encrustation and biofilm (E&B)

    Outcome measure:

    • Cell culturing (CFU counts per ml per bacterial microorganism)
    • Flow study (pressure value): A section of the retrieved stent will be used for flow study. The part will be placed into a larger diameter tube. DI water/Saline is injected using a pump into the inlet of the external tube and pressure sensor is connected to the inlet tube. Pressure readings will be captured per stent.
    • Dwell time

    Summary method:

    • Imaging (selected samples of stents will be examined using non-contact, non-destructive SEM (scanning-electron-microscopy) and/or episcopic-differential-interference-contrast (EDIC) microscopy allowing imaging of the surface with the biofilm in-situ and colonisation by bacteria - when needed)
    • Mean and standard deviation or median and quartiles of pressure readings

    Measured: From enrolment to stent removal (4 weeks for Kidney cohort), (25 weeks for Oncology cohort)

  2. To determine whether the novel stent leads to better clinical outcomes

    Outcome measure:

    • Individual component of the primary outcome
    • Urinary symptoms
    • Infections

    Summary method:

    • As per primary outcome
    • Frequency and percentage of participants experiencing each symptom
    • Frequency and percentage of people with antibiotic
    • use, readmission, urosepsis, ITU, death; number of infections per unit of time stent is in use

    Measured: From enrolment to completion of patient questionnaires 2-3 weeks post surgery 2 (4 weeks for Kidney cohort), 2-3 weeks post surgery 2 (~25 weeks for Oncology cohort)

  3. To assess impact of the novel stent on quality of life

    Outcome measure:

    Questionnaires at:

    • Baseline
    • While stent is in situ
    • Post-surgery

    Summary method:

    Appropriate descriptive summaries (e.g., median and quartiles) per timepoint

    Measured: Within first month of stent removal for participants (4 weeks for Kidney cohort), (25 weeks for Oncology cohort)

  4. To understand patient experience in having the novel ureteric stent inserted and reason for participation in the trial

    Outcome measure:

    30-45-minute Qualitative interviews with Oncology and Kidney stone cohorts

    Summary method:

    An inductive thematic analysis of interview transcripts

    Measured: From enrolment to stent removal (4 weeks for Kidney cohort), (25 weeks for Oncology cohort)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Feb 2025
  2. Study start6 Aug 2025
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Two single arm, multicentre unblinded first-in-human trials, including 2 phases and a qualitative substudy
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
50 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06815120
Sponsor's protocol ID
63246
Acronym
CASSETTE
Status last verified
Aug 2025
First submitted
4 Dec 2024
Last updated
11 May 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided: To be decided

Publications

  • Prattley S, Voss J, Cheung S, Geraghty R, Jones P, Somani BK. Ureteroscopy and stone treatment in the elderly (>/=70 years): prospective outcomes over 5- years with a review of literature. Int Braz J Urol. 2018 Jul-Aug;44(4):750-757. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2017.0516.

    PubMed 29522293
  • Heers H, Turney BW. Trends in urological stone disease: a 5-year update of hospital episode statistics. BJU Int. 2016 Nov;118(5):785-789. doi: 10.1111/bju.13520. Epub 2016 May 26.

    PubMed 27128735
  • Z. Chen, M. Prosperi, and V. Y. Bird, "Prevalence of kidney stones in the USA: The National Health and Nutrition Evaluation Survey," J Clin Urol, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 296-302, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1177/2051415818813820

  • C. R. UK, "Cancer incidence by age," 2020. https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/incidence/age#heading-Zero (accessed Apr. 11, 2021)

  • Kehinde EO, Rotimi VO, Al-Hunayan A, Abdul-Halim H, Boland F, Al-Awadi KA. Bacteriology of urinary tract infection associated with indwelling J ureteral stents. J Endourol. 2004 Nov;18(9):891-6. doi: 10.1089/end.2004.18.891.

    PubMed 15659928
  • S. T. Thomas, C. Heneghan, C. P. Price, A. van den Bruel, and A. Plüddemann, "Point-of-care testing for urinary tract infections - NIHR Community Healthcare MIC," NIHR, Jun. 2016. https://www.community.healthcare.mic.nihr.ac.uk/reports-and-resources/horizon-scanning-reports/point-of-care-testing-for-urinary-tract-infections (accessed Feb. 01, 2023)

  • Zumstein V, Betschart P, Albrich WC, Buhmann MT, Ren Q, Schmid HP, Abt D. Biofilm formation on ureteral stents - Incidence, clinical impact, and prevention. Swiss Med Wkly. 2017 Feb 3;147:w14408. doi: 10.4414/smw.2017.14408. eCollection 2017.

    PubMed 28165539
  • Feneley RC, Hopley IB, Wells PN. Urinary catheters: history, current status, adverse events and research agenda. J Med Eng Technol. 2015;39(8):459-70. doi: 10.3109/03091902.2015.1085600. Epub 2015 Sep 18.

    PubMed 26383168
  • Joshi HB, Stainthorpe A, MacDonagh RP, Keeley FX Jr, Timoney AG, Barry MJ. Indwelling ureteral stents: evaluation of symptoms, quality of life and utility. J Urol. 2003 Mar;169(3):1065-9; discussion 1069. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000048980.33855.90.

    PubMed 12576847
  • Ramachandra M, Mosayyebi A, Carugo D, Somani BK. Strategies to Improve Patient Outcomes and QOL: Current Complications of the Design and Placements of Ureteric Stents. Res Rep Urol. 2020 Jul 31;12:303-314. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S233981. eCollection 2020.

    PubMed 32802807
  • Mosayyebi A, Manes C, Carugo D, Somani BK. Advances in Ureteral Stent Design and Materials. Curr Urol Rep. 2018 Apr 10;19(5):35. doi: 10.1007/s11934-018-0779-y.

    PubMed 29637309
  • Mosayyebi A, Vijayakumar A, Yue QY, Bres-Niewada E, Manes C, Carugo D, Somani BK. Engineering solutions to ureteral stents: material, coating and design. Cent European J Urol. 2017;70(3):270-274. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2017.1520. Epub 2017 Aug 28.

    PubMed 29104790
  • Liatsikos EN, Kallidonis P, Kyriazis I, Karnabatidis D, Tsamandas A, Sakellaropoulos G, Flaris N, Rigopoulos C, Toronidis C, Efthimiou I, Filos K, Siablis D, Perimenis P. Metallic double pigtail ureteral stent usage during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the swine model: is there any effect on the ureter? J Endourol. 2009 Apr;23(4):685-91. doi: 10.1089/end.2008.0569.

    PubMed 19335328
  • S. Zheng et al., "Quantitative Evaluation of Encrustations in Double-J Ureteral Stents With Micro-Computed Tomography and Semantic Segmentation," Frontiers in Urology, vol. 2, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fruro.2022.836563

  • Tomer N, Garden E, Small A, Palese M. Ureteral Stent Encrustation: Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, Management and Current Technology. J Urol. 2021 Jan;205(1):68-77. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001343. Epub 2020 Aug 28.

    PubMed 32856981

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Experimental ureteric stent with specially shaped side-holes that prevent stagnation points (i.e., areas of low flow that cause particles to settle and E&B) and Qualitative interview in people with Catheter Blockage and Oncology, run by University of Southampton at 2 sites in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Ali Mosayyebi (02380594767, a.mosayyebi@soton.ac.uk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

To determine rates of stent failure (time frame: From enrolment to stent removal (4 weeks for Kidney cohort), (25 weeks for Oncology cohort)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06815120, which also lists 19 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 May 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in