Sports Physical TherapyQ/HNCT06818929
Relationship Between Active Flexibility and Hamstring Concentric to Eccentric Peak Torque Ratio in Athletes
An observational study of Sports Physical Therapy, run by Cairo University at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
This study measures flexibility using 2D video analysis during the H-test and assesses concentric/eccentric peak torque ratios (H/Q ratio) to determine their importance in returning to sport after a hamstring strain. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 21 to 34 years, men onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Sports Physical Therapy
- How many people
- 47 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- 1 Aug 2024to 24 Jan 2025
- How long will I take part?
- 1 Day
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 21 to 34 years
- Men only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Study population: - Male football players registered in the Egyptian Football Association with a history of hamstring strain for more than three months from Egyptian Clubs
Who may be able to join
- Football players registered in the Egyptian Football Association.
- Football players with a history of hamstring strain for more than three months.
Who cannot join
- Hamstring strain less than three months.
- ACL injury within the past 12 months (hamstring graft).
- Lumbar disc issues (L3-L4, L5-S1).
- Sacroiliac pain or dysfunction.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Egypt1 site
Faculty of Physical Therapy Cairo University
Giza, Ahmed Zayat - Between the Chateaux, 11432
About this study
Official title: Relationship Between Active Flexibility and Hamstring Concentric to Eccentric Peak Torque Ratio in Athletes: a Cross-Sectional Study
This study measures flexibility using 2D video analysis during the H-test and assesses concentric/eccentric peak torque ratios (H/Q ratio) to determine their importance in returning to sport after a hamstring strain.
Read the detailed description
This observational cross-sectional study aimed to assess the H:Q peak torque ratio, hamstring Ecc/Con peak torque ratio, and hamstring flexibility during the H-test using 2D video analysis in professional soccer players.
Participants:
Forty-seven participants (mean age: 28 ± 7 years; BMI: 22.98 ± 1.16 kg/m²) were recruited.
Inclusion criteria: History of hamstring strain for more than three months. Exclusion criteria: Recent hamstring injury within the last 3 months, ACL injury within the past 12 months (hamstring graft), lumbar disc issues (L3-L4, L5-S1), or sacroiliac dysfunction.
Sample Size Calculation:
Conducted using G*Power software (version 3.0.10) for a biserial correlation model with a power of 0.80, alpha level of 0.05, and effect size of 0.38.
Minimum of 47 participants, with 10% added for potential dropouts, yielding a total sample size of 52.
Standardization Procedures:
The principal investigator was responsible for all aspects of experimental preparation, including providing instructions, adjusting the isokinetic machine, attaching adaptors, placing braces, identifying bony landmarks, and collecting data.
The chair, dynamometer, and adaptor settings were configured according to CSMI guidelines to enhance inter-rater reliability.
Participants received standardized instructions on the warm-up process, isokinetic testing, and performing the H-test.
Familiarization sessions for both the isokinetic and H-tests were conducted beforehand using submaximal effort to ensure participants were well-versed in the procedures.
H-test:
The primary outcome measure, hamstring active flexibility, was assessed by measuring the range of motion during hip flexion.
Participants were positioned supine on a table with straps securing the contralateral leg, hip, and trunk to ensure stability and correct posture throughout the test.
Two visual markers were placed on the greater trochanter and lateral malleolus of the tested limb.
A knee support (Orthopedic Bracewear Air-X©) was applied to the tested limb to maintain knee extension and prevent flexion during the movement.
The procedure began with a warm-up consisting of three slow hip flexions, followed by three maximum-velocity trials, each separated by 5 seconds of rest.
Hip flexion was recorded using a smartphone (iPhone 12©, 30 Hz) mounted on a tripod positioned 3 meters from the participant and 1 meter in height.
Participants performed hip flexions at maximum speed and ROM while maintaining full knee extension.
The angle between the visual markers was captured through 2D video recording during each trial.
The recorded video footage was analyzed using Kinovea software (version 0.9.5) to calculate the hip flexion ROM.
Peak Torque Ratios Assessment:
The Cybex Norm isokinetic dynamometer was utilized for measurements of hamstring Ecc/Con peak torque as well as H:Q ratio.
Participants began with a 5-minute warm-up on a stationary bike, followed by dynamic stretching exercises.
For the hamstring Ecc/Con ratio assessment, participants were positioned prone on the isokinetic dynamometer with the knee axis aligned with the dynamometer's axis of rotation.
Familiarization sets consisting of submaximal-effort repetitions were performed.
Maximal-effort repetitions were conducted, and the highest peak torque achieved during eccentric and concentric contractions was recorded.
The Ecc/Con ratio was calculated by dividing the peak torque from eccentric contractions by the peak torque from concentric contractions.
For the H:Q ratio test, participants were seated on the isokinetic dynamometer with the knee axis aligned with the dynamometer's axis of rotation.
Familiarization sets were performed, followed by maximal-effort repetitions to assess the peak torque produced by both the hamstrings and quadriceps.
The H:Q ratio was calculated by dividing the peak torque of the hamstrings by that of the quadriceps.
Data Processing and Statistical Analysis:
Data were analyzed using Python (version 3.10). Descriptive statistics summarized participant characteristics and outcomes. Normality of data was confirmed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Pearson correlation was applied to examine relationships between H-test scores, Ecc/Con ratio, and H:Q ratio.
Multiple regression analyses assessed the influence of H-test scores and age on torque ratios, including interaction terms for combined effects.
Subgroup analyses stratified participants into age groups (≤25 years and >25 years) to explore age-related differences, with significance set at p < 0.05.
- Conditions
- Sports Physical Therapy
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Hamstring Active Flexibility
measuring the range of motion during hip flexion
Measured: immediately after the procedure
Peak torque ratios assessment of hamstring
hamstring Ecc/Con ratio assessment
Measured: immediately after the procedure
Peak torque ratios assessment of hamstring to quadriceps
The H:Q ratio was calculated by dividing the peak torque of the hamstrings by that of the quadriceps
Measured: immediately after the procedure
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Feb 2025
- Study start1 Aug 2024
- Primary completion14 Nov 2024
- Study completion24 Jan 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Sports Physical TherapyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Cairo UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 47 participants (actual)
- Target duration
- 1 Day
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Cairo University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, El.saieed Ahmed Attia, Cairo University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06818929
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- P.T.REC/012/005295
- Acronym
- Q/H
- Status last verified
- Feb 2025
- First submitted
- 16 Jan 2025
- Last updated
- 12 Feb 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Feb 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Relationship Between Active Flexibility and Hamstring Concentric to Eccentric Peak Torque Ratio in Athletes: a Cross-Sectional Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06818929
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Q/H / P.T.REC/012/005295
- Conditions
- Sports Physical Therapy
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 47 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Cairo UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Aug 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 14 Nov 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 24 Jan 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Feb 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study measures flexibility using 2D video analysis during the H-test and assesses concentric/eccentric peak torque ratios (H/Q ratio) to determine their importance in returning to sport after a hamstring strain.
Detailed description
This observational cross-sectional study aimed to assess the H:Q peak torque ratio, hamstring Ecc/Con peak torque ratio, and hamstring flexibility during the H-test using 2D video analysis in professional soccer players.
Participants:
Forty-seven participants (mean age: 28 ± 7 years; BMI: 22.98 ± 1.16 kg/m²) were recruited.
Inclusion criteria: History of hamstring strain for more than three months. Exclusion criteria: Recent hamstring injury within the last 3 months, ACL injury within the past 12 months (hamstring graft), lumbar disc issues (L3-L4, L5-S1), or sacroiliac dysfunction.
Sample Size Calculation:
Conducted using G*Power software (version 3.0.10) for a biserial correlation model with a power of 0.80, alpha level of 0.05, and effect size of 0.38.
Minimum of 47 participants, with 10% added for potential dropouts, yielding a total sample size of 52.
Standardization Procedures:
The principal investigator was responsible for all aspects of experimental preparation, including providing instructions, adjusting the isokinetic machine, attaching adaptors, placing braces, identifying bony landmarks, and collecting data.
The chair, dynamometer, and adaptor settings were configured according to CSMI guidelines to enhance inter-rater reliability.
Participants received standardized instructions on the warm-up process, isokinetic testing, and performing the H-test.
Familiarization sessions for both the isokinetic and H-tests were conducted beforehand using submaximal effort to ensure participants were well-versed in the procedures.
H-test:
The primary outcome measure, hamstring active flexibility, was assessed by measuring the range of motion during hip flexion.
Participants were positioned supine on a table with straps securing the contralateral leg, hip, and trunk to ensure stability and correct posture throughout the test.
Two visual markers were placed on the greater trochanter and lateral malleolus of the tested limb.
A knee support (Orthopedic Bracewear Air-X©) was applied to the tested limb to maintain knee extension and prevent flexion during the movement.
The procedure began with a warm-up consisting of three slow hip flexions, followed by three maximum-velocity trials, each separated by 5 seconds of rest.
Hip flexion was recorded using a smartphone (iPhone 12©, 30 Hz) mounted on a tripod positioned 3 meters from the participant and 1 meter in height.
Participants performed hip flexions at maximum speed and ROM while maintaining full knee extension.
The angle between the visual markers was captured through 2D video recording during each trial.
The recorded video footage was analyzed using Kinovea software (version 0.9.5) to calculate the hip flexion ROM.
Peak Torque Ratios Assessment:
The Cybex Norm isokinetic dynamometer was utilized for measurements of hamstring Ecc/Con peak torque as well as H:Q ratio.
Participants began with a 5-minute warm-up on a stationary bike, followed by dynamic stretching exercises.
For the hamstring Ecc/Con ratio assessment, participants were positioned prone on the isokinetic dynamometer with the knee axis aligned with the dynamometer's axis of rotation.
Familiarization sets consisting of submaximal-effort repetitions were performed.
Maximal-effort repetitions were conducted, and the highest peak torque achieved during eccentric and concentric contractions was recorded.
The Ecc/Con ratio was calculated by dividing the peak torque from eccentric contractions by the peak torque from concentric contractions.
For the H:Q ratio test, participants were seated on the isokinetic dynamometer with the knee axis aligned with the dynamometer's axis of rotation.
Familiarization sets were performed, followed by maximal-effort repetitions to assess the peak torque produced by both the hamstrings and quadriceps.
The H:Q ratio was calculated by dividing the peak torque of the hamstrings by that of the quadriceps.
Data Processing and Statistical Analysis:
Data were analyzed using Python (version 3.10). Descriptive statistics summarized participant characteristics and outcomes. Normality of data was confirmed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Pearson correlation was applied to examine relationships between H-test scores, Ecc/Con ratio, and H:Q ratio.
Multiple regression analyses assessed the influence of H-test scores and age on torque ratios, including interaction terms for combined effects.
Subgroup analyses stratified participants into age groups (≤25 years and >25 years) to explore age-related differences, with significance set at p < 0.05.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Target follow-up
- 1 Day
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 21 to 34 years
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
- Study population
- - Male football players registered in the Egyptian Football Association with a history of hamstring strain for more than three months from Egyptian Clubs
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Football players registered in the Egyptian Football Association.
- Football players with a history of hamstring strain for more than three months.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Hamstring strain less than three months.
- ACL injury within the past 12 months (hamstring graft).
- Lumbar disc issues (L3-L4, L5-S1).
- Sacroiliac pain or dysfunction.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Hamstring Active Flexibility
Time frame: immediately after the procedure
measuring the range of motion during hip flexion
Peak torque ratios assessment of hamstring
Time frame: immediately after the procedure
hamstring Ecc/Con ratio assessment
Peak torque ratios assessment of hamstring to quadriceps
Time frame: immediately after the procedure
The H:Q ratio was calculated by dividing the peak torque of the hamstrings by that of the quadriceps
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Feb 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Sports Physical Therapy
Recruiting
Effects of Scapular Training on Adolescent Boxers
Sports Physical Therapy
Recruiting
Comparative Effects of Dolphin Kick Streamline Training Versus Flutter Kick Training in Competitive Swimmers
Sports Physical Therapy
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Explosive Plyometric Training Versus Thera-Band Power Training on Sprint Swimming Performance
Sports Physical Therapy
Not yet recruiting
Comparative Effects of Spencer Muscle Energy Technique Versus Post Facilitation Stretch Among Fast Bowlers
Sports Physical Therapy
Recruiting
Core Training in Amateur Soccer Players
Sports Physical Therapy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Sports Physical Therapy, run by Cairo University at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Feb 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Hamstring Active Flexibility (time frame: immediately after the procedure). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Feb 2025; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 30 Oct 2026.