Corneal DystrophyGRACENCT06844123
Microsurgical Robot-assisted Corneal Transplant
A study testing Robot-assisted keratoplasty in people with Corneal Dystrophy, run by CHU de Reims at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
Full-thickness corneal grafting (transfixing keratoplasty) is a tissue graft described at the beginning of the 20th century, which has remained technically unchanged for several decades. Around 900 transfixing keratoplasties are performed every year in France. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Corneal Dystrophy
- What is being tested?
- Robot-assisted keratoplasty
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 10 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- 6 Jun 2025to Apr 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients of legal age seen in a specialized ophthalmology consultation at the Reims University Hospital, and requiring transfixing keratoplasty.
- Affiliated to a social security scheme
- Agreeing to take part in the study (information and signature of consent form).
Who cannot join
- Patients protected by law
- Patients with an ocular pathology other than their corneal pathology.
- Mentally incapable of adhering to the principles of the study.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
France1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Chu Reims
Reims, 51092
Damien JOLLY, 326788472 ext. 33, djolly@chu-reims.fr
About this study
Official title: Graft Robot-Assisted Corneal Enhancement
Full-thickness corneal grafting (transfixing keratoplasty) is a tissue graft described at the beginning of the 20th century, which has remained technically unchanged for several decades. Around 900 transfixing keratoplasties are performed every year in France. This microsurgical procedure is intended for patients with severe corneal pathology that seriously impairs visual function, and for whom no therapeutic alternative - optical devices, medication or other surgical procedure - exists.
The initial anatomical outcome of surgery depends on the accurate execution of the corneal sutures. Very recently, a robot with microsurgical capabilities was developed by the MMI company (Symani® surgical system, now available from the Reims University Hospital). This robot is equipped with forceps and a needle holder capable of handling fragile tissues and microsurgical needles with an amplitude of movement greater than that of the human hand. It is operated by a surgeon via a wireless controller and foot pedal. It could thus be used to perform the usual sutures of a transfixing keratoplasty.
Read more
To our knowledge, no study to date has evaluated the contribution of a microsurgical robot to transfixing keratoplasty in humans. The Symani® microsurgical robot recently received CE marking for microsurgery. The investigators were able to carry out a series of ex vivo keratoplasties using the robot to suture non-conforming human corneas (destined for destruction), thus proving the feasibility of the procedure.
On the basis of this proof of concept, our project aims to evaluate the performance of robot-assisted transfixing keratoplasty in patients requiring corneal transplantation. Robotic assistance for human eye surgery, particularly corneal transplants, has never been evaluated. The use of a robot to perform corneal sutures during transfixing keratoplasty could equal or even surpass the performance of this crucial surgical step, which is conventionally performed manually. Ultimately, visual results could be equivalent or even better than those obtained after conventional surgery. At the same time, the use of the robot will be evaluated in terms of surgical cost, in order to obtain a quantified financial evaluation of robot-assisted keratoplasty.
Read the detailed description
Context Transfixing keratoplasty was developed in the early 20th century. The aim is to replace the entire central cornea with a corneal allograft. This microsurgical procedure is performed with the aid of an operating microscope, and under general anesthetic to ensure optimal control of the absence of movement and arteriovenous pressure throughout the procedure.
Suturing is therefore an essential part of transfixing keratoplasty. They determine the congruence of the tissue edges and the distribution of tension applied to the sutures, thus modulating the curvature (astigmatism) of the graft. This curvature will determine the optical properties of the eye, and hence its acuity and the patient's visual recovery. A topical immunomodulatory local treatment (corticosteroids and/or ciclosporin eye drops) is administered for several years; no systemic treatment is used. Sutures are usually removed 6 months to 1 year after surgery. Current indications are major declines in visual acuity - generally below 4/10 with the best possible correction - associated with i) severe keratoconus, the most frequent indication, ii) failed anterior grafts, iii) full-thickness central corneal scars, and iv) hereditary stromal dystrophies.
Robot-assisted surgery has developed considerably over the last twenty years, with procedures now routinely performed in macro- and endoscopic surgery (mainly urology, obstetrics and visceral surgery). Very recently, engineering advances in precision motion control and mechanical miniaturization have enabled the development of robots dedicated to microsurgery. The Symani® Surgical System (Medical MicroInstrument, Pisa, Italy) has been used and evaluated in animals and humans over the past two years for vessel and nerve microsurgery. The Symani® robot is equipped with forceps and a needle holder capable of handling fragile tissue, as well as microsurgical needles and wires (8/0 to 12/0). The Symani® robot has recently been CE-marked for microsurgery [appendix 1]. To date, there is only one study - ex vivo and in animals - on the feasibility of its use in ocular surgery. On the basis of the robot's capabilities and its CE mark, the investigators have carried out preliminary experiments, enabling us to envisage robot-assisted keratoplasty in humans.
On the basis of our preliminary results, the investigators hypothesize that it is possible to use the Symani® robot's assistance to perform the major surgical stage of transfixing keratoplasty, i.e. the sutures between the graft and the recipient cornea, in humans.
Objectives :
- Main:
- Evaluate the feasibility, and intraoperative intercurrent events of robotic assistance during transfixing keratoplasty,
- Identify possible early and late postoperative intercurrent events/adverse events related to robot use.
- Secondary :
- Evaluate the impact of robotic assistance during transfixing keratoplasty on postoperative corneal anatomical outcome (graft curvature). ii) Assess the impact of robotic assistance on refraction and visual outcome in the medium term: 3 months iii) Evaluate the mean degree of astigmatism post robotic-assisted grafting, so as to be able to calculate the number of subjects required for a subsequent study of the superiority of robotic-assisted surgery over usual conventional surgery. iiii) Evaluate the additional cost of robotic-assisted surgery. iv) Evaluate the quality of life before and 3 months after the intervention Type of study: pilot feasibility study, monocentric, interventional. Population: Ten consecutive adult patients requiring transfixing keratoplasty who agreed to participate by signing an informed consent form.
Investigation plan : The study will be offered to patients scheduled for penetrating keratoplasty. Clinical follow-up will be conducted at Day 1, Day 7, Day 30. Final clinical and paraclinical check-up at Day 90 and end of participation.
- Conditions
- Corneal Dystrophy
- Being tested
- Robot-assisted keratoplasty
- Medical subject headings
- Corneal Dystrophies, Hereditary
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Robot-assisted keratoplastyProcedure or surgery
Feasibility pilot interventional study. Monocentric, one arm. Microsurgical robot will be used to perform penetrating keratoplasty. During the procedure, the corneal sutures will be performed using symani surgical system, that is a microsurgical robot controlled by a surgeon
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Robot-assisted keratoplasty group | Experimental | patients undergoing robot-assisted corneal transplantation Receives: Procedure: Robot-assisted keratoplasty |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Descriptive analysis of unusual events intra- and postoperatively
Number and percentage of unusual events
Measured: Day O (intraoperative) to Day 7
Descriptive analysis of unusual events
Number and percentage of unusual events
Measured: Day 7 to Day 90
Secondary outcomes (9)
Postoperative corneal anatomical result
Anterior topographic will be performed and compare central astigmatism
Measured: Day 90
Visual acuity with correction
The mean diopters
Measured: Day 90
Visual acuity without correction
The mean diopters
Measured: Day 90
Corneal topographic regularity
Corneal topographic regularity measured by surface regularity index (SRI)
Measured: Day 90
Corneal topographic regularity
Corneal topographic regularity measured by surface asymmetry index (SAI)
Measured: Day 90
Subjective refraction
Measurement of spherical equivalent (SE)
Measured: Day 90
Subjective refraction
Measurement of refractive astigmatism (CYL)
Measured: Day 90
Analysis of surgical costs
cost of graft and materials used
Measured: Month 6
National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire
Quality of life - National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire
Measured: Day 90
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Feb 2025
- Study start6 Jun 2025
- Primary completionJun 2026 (estimated)
- Study completionApr 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Corneal DystrophyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- CHU de Reims
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06844123
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PS25009*
- Acronym
- GRACE
- Status last verified
- Jun 2025
- First submitted
- 6 Feb 2025
- Last updated
- 26 Jun 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Jun 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Graft Robot-Assisted Corneal Enhancement
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06844123
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- GRACE / PS25009*
- Conditions
- Corneal Dystrophy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- CHU de ReimsUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 6 Jun 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jun 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Apr 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 25 Feb 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Full-thickness corneal grafting (transfixing keratoplasty) is a tissue graft described at the beginning of the 20th century, which has remained technically unchanged for several decades. Around 900 transfixing keratoplasties are performed every year in France. This microsurgical procedure is intended for patients with severe corneal pathology that seriously impairs visual function, and for whom no therapeutic alternative - optical devices, medication or other surgical procedure - exists.
The initial anatomical outcome of surgery depends on the accurate execution of the corneal sutures. Very recently, a robot with microsurgical capabilities was developed by the MMI company (Symani® surgical system, now available from the Reims University Hospital). This robot is equipped with forceps and a needle holder capable of handling fragile tissues and microsurgical needles with an amplitude of movement greater than that of the human hand. It is operated by a surgeon via a wireless controller and foot pedal. It could thus be used to perform the usual sutures of a transfixing keratoplasty.
To our knowledge, no study to date has evaluated the contribution of a microsurgical robot to transfixing keratoplasty in humans. The Symani® microsurgical robot recently received CE marking for microsurgery. The investigators were able to carry out a series of ex vivo keratoplasties using the robot to suture non-conforming human corneas (destined for destruction), thus proving the feasibility of the procedure.
On the basis of this proof of concept, our project aims to evaluate the performance of robot-assisted transfixing keratoplasty in patients requiring corneal transplantation. Robotic assistance for human eye surgery, particularly corneal transplants, has never been evaluated. The use of a robot to perform corneal sutures during transfixing keratoplasty could equal or even surpass the performance of this crucial surgical step, which is conventionally performed manually. Ultimately, visual results could be equivalent or even better than those obtained after conventional surgery. At the same time, the use of the robot will be evaluated in terms of surgical cost, in order to obtain a quantified financial evaluation of robot-assisted keratoplasty.
Detailed description
Context Transfixing keratoplasty was developed in the early 20th century. The aim is to replace the entire central cornea with a corneal allograft. This microsurgical procedure is performed with the aid of an operating microscope, and under general anesthetic to ensure optimal control of the absence of movement and arteriovenous pressure throughout the procedure.
Suturing is therefore an essential part of transfixing keratoplasty. They determine the congruence of the tissue edges and the distribution of tension applied to the sutures, thus modulating the curvature (astigmatism) of the graft. This curvature will determine the optical properties of the eye, and hence its acuity and the patient's visual recovery. A topical immunomodulatory local treatment (corticosteroids and/or ciclosporin eye drops) is administered for several years; no systemic treatment is used. Sutures are usually removed 6 months to 1 year after surgery. Current indications are major declines in visual acuity - generally below 4/10 with the best possible correction - associated with i) severe keratoconus, the most frequent indication, ii) failed anterior grafts, iii) full-thickness central corneal scars, and iv) hereditary stromal dystrophies.
Robot-assisted surgery has developed considerably over the last twenty years, with procedures now routinely performed in macro- and endoscopic surgery (mainly urology, obstetrics and visceral surgery). Very recently, engineering advances in precision motion control and mechanical miniaturization have enabled the development of robots dedicated to microsurgery. The Symani® Surgical System (Medical MicroInstrument, Pisa, Italy) has been used and evaluated in animals and humans over the past two years for vessel and nerve microsurgery. The Symani® robot is equipped with forceps and a needle holder capable of handling fragile tissue, as well as microsurgical needles and wires (8/0 to 12/0). The Symani® robot has recently been CE-marked for microsurgery [appendix 1]. To date, there is only one study - ex vivo and in animals - on the feasibility of its use in ocular surgery. On the basis of the robot's capabilities and its CE mark, the investigators have carried out preliminary experiments, enabling us to envisage robot-assisted keratoplasty in humans.
On the basis of our preliminary results, the investigators hypothesize that it is possible to use the Symani® robot's assistance to perform the major surgical stage of transfixing keratoplasty, i.e. the sutures between the graft and the recipient cornea, in humans.
Objectives :
- Main:
- Evaluate the feasibility, and intraoperative intercurrent events of robotic assistance during transfixing keratoplasty,
- Identify possible early and late postoperative intercurrent events/adverse events related to robot use.
- Secondary :
- Evaluate the impact of robotic assistance during transfixing keratoplasty on postoperative corneal anatomical outcome (graft curvature). ii) Assess the impact of robotic assistance on refraction and visual outcome in the medium term: 3 months iii) Evaluate the mean degree of astigmatism post robotic-assisted grafting, so as to be able to calculate the number of subjects required for a subsequent study of the superiority of robotic-assisted surgery over usual conventional surgery. iiii) Evaluate the additional cost of robotic-assisted surgery. iv) Evaluate the quality of life before and 3 months after the intervention Type of study: pilot feasibility study, monocentric, interventional. Population: Ten consecutive adult patients requiring transfixing keratoplasty who agreed to participate by signing an informed consent form.
Investigation plan : The study will be offered to patients scheduled for penetrating keratoplasty. Clinical follow-up will be conducted at Day 1, Day 7, Day 30. Final clinical and paraclinical check-up at Day 90 and end of participation.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Robot-assisted keratoplasty group | Experimental | Procedure: Robot-assisted keratoplastypatients undergoing robot-assisted corneal transplantation |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients of legal age seen in a specialized ophthalmology consultation at the Reims University Hospital, and requiring transfixing keratoplasty.
- Affiliated to a social security scheme
- Agreeing to take part in the study (information and signature of consent form).
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients protected by law
- Patients with an ocular pathology other than their corneal pathology.
- Mentally incapable of adhering to the principles of the study.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Robot-assisted keratoplastyFeasibility pilot interventional study. Monocentric, one arm. Microsurgical robot will be used to perform penetrating keratoplasty. During the procedure, the corneal sutures will be performed using symani surgical system, that is a microsurgical robot controlled by a surgeon | Procedure or surgery | Robot-assisted keratoplasty group |
Primary outcome
Descriptive analysis of unusual events intra- and postoperatively
Time frame: Day O (intraoperative) to Day 7
Number and percentage of unusual events
Descriptive analysis of unusual events
Time frame: Day 7 to Day 90
Number and percentage of unusual events
9 secondary outcomes
Postoperative corneal anatomical result
Time frame: Day 90
Visual acuity with correction
Time frame: Day 90
Visual acuity without correction
Time frame: Day 90
Corneal topographic regularity
Time frame: Day 90
Corneal topographic regularity
Time frame: Day 90
Subjective refraction
Time frame: Day 90
Subjective refraction
Time frame: Day 90
Analysis of surgical costs
Time frame: Month 6
National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire
Time frame: Day 90
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Jun 2025.
Related trials for Corneal Dystrophy
RecruitingPhase 2
An Open-Label Phase 2 Study of N-Acetyl-D-Mannosamine (ManNAc) in Subjects With Podocyte Diseases
Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis, Minimal Change Disease
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Virotherapy and Natural History Study of KHSV-Associated Multricentric Castleman s Disease With Correlates of Disease Activity
Lymphoproliferative Disorder, HHV-8
RecruitingObservational study
Rare Disease Patient Registry & Natural History Study - Coordination of Rare Diseases at Sanford
Rare Disorders, Undiagnosed Disorders
RecruitingPhase 2
Study of EO2002 in Subjects With Corneal Edema Secondary to Corneal Endothelial Dysfunction
Corneal Edema, Fuchs
RecruitingObservational study
A Study to Test the Diagnostic Potential of Brillouin Microscopy for Corneal Ectasia
Keratoconus, Ectasia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Robot-assisted keratoplasty in people with Corneal Dystrophy, run by CHU de Reims at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Jun 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Alexandre DENOYER (0326787888 ext. 0033, adenoyer@chu-reims.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Descriptive analysis of unusual events intra- and postoperatively (time frame: Day O (intraoperative) to Day 7). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Jun 2025.