AzTrials
AzTrials

Resistance TrainingILEXNCT06852872

The Effect of Diathermy Therapy on Isolated Lumbar Extension (ILEX) Training

A study testing CRET Therapy and ILEX training in people with Resistance Training and Healthy Participants Study, run by University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland at 1 site in Switzerland.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To evaluate the effectiveness of the Isolated Back Extension (ILEX) machine Myosom and examine the influence of preheating on resistance training, the investigators will recruit a cohort of 14 healthy individuals, including both male and female participants, who have no prior experience with ILEX training, for a… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 30 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
CRET Therapy and ILEX training
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
26 participants
Where
1 siteSwitzerland
Study dates
29 Apr 2024to 15 Apr 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 30 years
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • healthy
  • pain-free
  • sufficient understanding of the German language
  • able to give informed consent
  • between 18 and 30

Who cannot join

  • pregnant
  • medication
  • surgery of lumbar spine
  • knee or hip disorders
  • low back pain
  • pathologies or deformities of lumbar spine
  • other disorders
  • previous or current ILEX Training

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Switzerland1 site
  • University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland

    Landquart, Kanton Graubünden, 7302

Other trials in Switzerland

About this study

To evaluate the effectiveness of the Isolated Back Extension (ILEX) machine Myosom and examine the influence of preheating on resistance training, the investigators will recruit a cohort of 14 healthy individuals, including both male and female participants, who have no prior experience with ILEX training, for a 9-week training program consisting of a total of 18 sessions. Baseline (BL) measurements will be conducted in the week before the initiation of training, and two follow-up measurements (F/U 1 and F/U 2) carried out after the ninth and eighteenth sessions, with a minimum break of 48 hours after the last training session to ensure proper recovery and to prevent inaccuracies in muscle thickness measurement arising due to acute oedema.

Read the detailed description

To evaluate the effectiveness of the Isolated Back Extension (ILEX) machine Myosom and examine the influence of preheating on resistance training, the investigators will recruit a cohort of 14 healthy individuals, including both male and female participants, who have no prior experience with ILEX training, for a 9-week training program consisting of a total of 18 sessions. Baseline (BL) measurements will be conducted in the week before the initiation of training, and two follow-up measurements (F/U 1 and F/U 2) carried out after the ninth and eighteenth sessions, with a minimum break of 48 hours after the last training session to ensure proper recovery and to prevent inaccuracies in muscle thickness measurement arising due to acute edema.

At BL, participants will need to give written informed consent and be familiarized to the back extensor machine and Category-Ratio-Scale (CR10) for the assessment of perceived effort and discomfort as well as thermal sensation and thermal comfort. Baseline assessment will include epidemiological data such as age, sex, height, and weight. At all three measurements (BL, F/U 1, F/U 2), the lumbar extensor musculature thickness (M. erector spinae) is evaluated through the ultrasound system Mylab2 (Esaote, Maastricht, Netherlands), the lower back flexibility is examined using a sit-and-reach test, and the isometric back extension endurance is measured through the Biering-Sørrensen test. Finally, maximal range of motion (ROM) and maximal voluntary isometric contraction will be evaluated using the Myosom machine.

Participants will be randomly assigned to either the sham group, which will receive a 10-minute treatment with Tecar device (T-Plus, Wintecare SA, Chiasso, Switzerland) turned off and not sending radiofrequency before each exercise session, or the intervention group, which will undergo a 10-minute treatment with the Tecar device to induce 448kHz capacitive monopolar radiofrequency and facilitate warming up of deep tissues. After every treatment the participants will be asked to rate their thermal sensation and comfort. Skin temperature will be measured using an infrared thermal imaging (FLIR A615 series, Emitec Industrial, Rotkreuz, Switzerland) after the first and final Tecar treatment.

Training will take place twice a week, beginning with a dynamic warm-up of the lumbar extensor for 120s, followed by three sets of resistance training (RT) lasting 120s, 120s, and 150s respectively, and concluding with a final set of dynamic recovery lasting 60s. 30-second recovery will be provided between every set. A low load will be used for the warm-up and recovery. The load will be subsequently increased until volitional fatigue. Repetitions will be executed by taking three seconds from complete flexion to complete extension, ensuring standardization at 20 repetitions per minute. A metronome with 40 beats per minute will provide audible feedback. The Myosom machine emits an audible signal upon completion of each phase of the repetition to guarantee a complete range of motion is achieved. Subsequent to every training session, participants will be requested to provide their effort (RPE-E) and discomfort (RPE-D) values.

Being tested
CRET Therapy, ILEX training, CRET therapy sham
Keywords
Isolated lumbar extension training, lumbar muscle, Thermal Therapy

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • CRET TherapyOther

    Also called TECAR therapy, Diathermy therapy

    Diathermy therapy with a protocol to preheat the back extensor muscle

  • ILEX trainingOther

    Isolated lumbar Extension Training

  • CRET therapy shamOther

    Also called TECAR therapy, Diathermy therapy

    Diathermy therapy withouth any radiofrequency as a sham intervention

Study groups in NCT06852872
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Intervention groupExperimentalCapacitive Resistive Electric Transfer (CRET) therapy AND Isolate Lumbar Extension (ILEX) Training.
Receives: Other: CRET Therapy; Other: ILEX training
Sham GroupSham comparatorSham Capacitive Resistive Electric Transfer (CRET) therapy AND Isolate Lumbar Extension (ILEX) Training.
Receives: Other: ILEX training; Other: CRET therapy sham

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Maximal Isometric Force of the Back Extensors

    Maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) of the back extensor was measured using the ILEX machine. With arms folded across the chest, participants performed a slow, continuous 2-3 s maximal-effort back extension against the fixed upper-back pad. Peak torque (N) was recorded electronically, and the higher of two trials was used for analysis.

    Measured: Baseline, 3 weeks, 6 weeks

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Isometric Back Extension Endurance

    Back extensor endurance (s) was assessed using the Biering-Sørensen test. Participants lay prone on an examination table with the upper iliac crests aligned with the table edge, and the lower body secured by straps placed around the proximal thighs and calves.With arms folded across the chest, participants held a horizontal upper body in contact with a bar for as long as possible.

    Measured: base line, 3 weeks, 6 weeks

  2. Thickness of the Mm. Erector Spine

    Muscle thickness (MT) of the M. erector spinae was measured using ultrasound. Participants lay prone on an examination table, and the probe was positioned perpendicular to the muscle on the right side of the lower back, using coupling gel and minimal pressure. The thickness of the longissimus was measured as the distance (mm) from the outermost point of the fascia to the outermost point of the L3 transverse process.

    Measured: Baseline, 3 weeks, 6 weeks

  3. Lumbar Flexibility

    Lumbar flexibility was measured using the sit-and-reach test, a combination of the flexibility of the M. erector spinae and hamstrings. The participant is seated in front of the test box keeping the knees fully extended and the feet dorsiflexed against the foot-support. The fingertips are placed together, one hand on top of the other. The participant is moving actively, slowly forward, bringing the body to the pain-free limit. The participant's hands move the block along the scale until the movement is terminated because the subject can go no farther. The final position is held with an isometric contraction for 2 seconds, and the distance is read on the scale. The test is repeated twice and an average score is taken for further analysis

    Measured: Baseline, 3 weeks, 6 weeks

  4. Lumbar Range of Motion (ROM)

    Lumbar spine range of motion (ROM) was assessed using the ILEX machine's built-in goniometer. Participants performed three maximal dynamic backward-forward repetitions, with peak flexion and extension recorded electronically and summed to calculate the total ROM (º). The higher of two trials was used for analysis.

    Measured: Baseline, 3 weeks, 6 weeks

  5. Rating of Perceived Effort

    Participants rated perceived effort (RPE-E) during resistance training using a 10-point Category-Ratio Scale (CR10). Immediately after each training session, the examiner asked the participant, "How hard do you think you're working?" Participants reported their perception verbally using a 0 (no exertion) to 10 (maximal exertion) scale while referencing a visual representation of the scale.

    Measured: After each of the 12 training sessions (t1-t12), twice a week for 6 weeks

  6. Rating of Perceived Discomfort

    Participants reported perceived discomfort (RPE-D) using a 10-point Category-Ratio Scale. RPE-D reflects physiological discomfort associated with muscular fatigue, helping to differentiate effort from discomfort. Immediately after each training session, the examiner asked the participant, "How uncomfortable was the exercise?" Participants reported their perception verbally using a 0 (no discomfort at all) to 10 (maximal discomfort) scale while referencing a visual representation of the scale.

    Measured: After each of the 12 training sessions (t1-t12), twice a week for 6 weeks

  7. Rating of Thermal Sensation

    Thermal sensation was measured using a 9-point Likert scale according to SN EN ISO 10551:2020, ranging from -4 ("very cold") to +4 ("very hot"), with 0 representing neutral. Participants were asked, "How does your back feel?" The question and response options were presented in German. Participants reported their thermal sensation verbally while referencing a visual representation of the scale

    Measured: After each of the 12 therapy sessions (t1-t12), twice a week for 6 weeks

  8. Rating of Perceived Comfort

    Perceived comfort was assessed using a 5-point scale ranging from 0 ("comfortable") to 4 ("extremely uncomfortable"), with intermediate options 1 ("slightly uncomfortable"), 2 ("uncomfortable"), and 3 ("very uncomfortable"). Participants were asked, "How did the treatment feel?" The question and response options were presented in German. Participants reported their thermal sensation and comfort verbally while referencing a visual representation of the scale.

    Measured: After each of the 12 therapy sessions (t1-t12), twice a week for 6 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Feb 2025
  2. Study start29 Apr 2024
  3. Primary completion15 Apr 2025
  4. Study completion15 Apr 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
RCT
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
26 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06852872
Sponsor's protocol ID
2023-02308_ILEX
Other IDs
2023
Acronym
ILEX
Status last verified
Oct 2026
First submitted
7 May 2024
Last updated
30 Oct 2026
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing CRET Therapy and ILEX training in people with Resistance Training and Healthy Participants Study, run by University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland at 1 site in Switzerland.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 30 Oct 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Maximal Isometric Force of the Back Extensors (time frame: Baseline, 3 weeks, 6 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Oct 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in