Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeePRONENCT06854627
Effect of Continuous Prolonged Prone Position Versus Intermittent Daily Prone Position in ARDS
A study testing Daily prone position sessions and Prolonged prone position sessions in people with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, run by Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile at 38 sites in 6 countries.
Trial summary
Prone position (placing the patient on his abdomen) has been shown to be an effective intervention to decrease mortality in adults connected to mechanical ventilation for moderate to severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS). Patients may require one or more sessions of prone position. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
- What is being tested?
- Daily prone position sessions and Prolonged prone position sessions
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 780 participants
- Where
- 38 sitesin 6 countries
- Study dates
- 7 Apr 2025to Jan 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation for less than 72 hours
- Moderate-severe ARDS defined as:
- Within 1 week of a known clinical insult or new or worsening respiratory symptoms
- Bilateral infiltrates not fully explained by effusions, lobar/lung collapse, or nodules
- Respiratory failure not fully explained by cardiac failure or fluid overload
- PaO2/FiO2 < 150 mmHg in supine position
- Prone positioning has been indicated by the attending physician, OR has already been initiated within the last 16 hours
Who cannot join
- Contraindications for prone positioning such as intracranial pressure > 20 mmHg, massive hemoptysis, recent tracheal surgery or sternotomy or abdominal surgery with an open wound, recent facial trauma or facial surgery, unstable spine, femur, or pelvic fractures, or a single anterior chest tube with air leaks
- Patient on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) before randomization
- Chronic respiratory failure requiring oxygen therapy or non-invasive ventilation (NIV)
- Known pregnancy
- Anticipating withdrawal of life support or shift to palliative care
Trial locations and contacts
38 sites in 6 countries. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
38 sites in 6 countries
Chile23 sites, 23 recruiting
- Recruiting
Hospital Leonardo Guzmán
Antofagasta
Vinko Tomicic, MD, vtomicic@gmail.com
Vinko Tomicic, MD
- Recruiting
Hospital Clínico Herminda Martín
Chillan
Pablo Nvarrete, MD, pdnavarr@gmail.com
Pablo Navarrete, MD
- Recruiting
Hospital Guillermo Grant Benavente
Concepción
Paula Fernández, MD, fernandezandrade@gmail.com
Paula Fernández, MD
- Recruiting
Hospital San Juan de Dios de Curicó
Curicó
Nelson Perez, MD, nperez21@gmail.com
Nelson Perez, MD
- Recruiting
Hospital Regional Dr. Ernesto Torres Galdames
Iquique
Roberto Galvez, MD, Dr.robertogalvez@yahoo.com
Roberto Galvez, MD
- Recruiting
Complejo Asistencial Dr. Victor Ríos Ruiz
Los Ángeles
Fernando Tirapegui, MD, ftirapegui@uc.cl
Fernando Tirapegui, MD
- Recruiting
Hospital Base San Jose de Osorno
Osorno
Mario Grade, MD, mario.grage@redsalud.gob.cl
Mario Grage, MD
- Recruiting
Hospital de Quilpué
Quilpué
Mario Bruna, MD, mbrunap74@gmail.com
Mario Bruna, MD
- Recruiting
Hospital Franco Ravera Zunino
Rancagua
Victor Vásquez, MD, victor.vasquezg@redsalud.gob.cl
Victor Vásquez, MD
- Recruiting
Clínica Las Condes
Santiago
Martín Benites, MD, PhD(c), benitesmartinh@gmail.com
Martin Benites, MD, PhD(c)
- Recruiting
Clínica San Carlos de Apoquindo
Santiago
Rene Medina, PT, rmedina@ucchristus.cl
Rene Medina, PT
- Recruiting
Clínica Santa Maria
Santiago
Tomas Regueria, MD, tregueira@gmail.com
Tomas Regueira, MD
- Recruiting
Clínica Universidad de los Andes
Santiago
Juan Castillo, MD, jucastillo@clinicauandes.cl
Juan Castillo, MD
- Recruiting
Complejo Asistencial Dr. Sótero del Rio
Santiago
Carolina Ruiz, MD, ccruiz@uc.cl
Carolina Ruiz, MD
- Recruiting
Hospital Barros Luco
Santiago
Juan Pablo Valdivia, MD, jp.valdivia@hotmail.com
Juan Pablo Valdivia, MD
- Recruiting
Hospital Clínico UC Christus
Santiago
Roque Basoalto, PT, PhD, roque.basoalto@gmail.com
Roque Basoalto, PT, PhD
- Recruiting
Hospital Clínico Universidad de Chile
Santiago
Rodrigo Cornejo, MD, rcornejor@hcuch.cl
Rodrigo Cornejo, MD
- Recruiting
Hospital Del Salvador Providencia
Santiago
José Antonio Escalona, MD, josan553@gmail.com
José Antonio Escalona, MD
- Recruiting
Hospital Dra. Eloisa Diaz
Santiago
Eduardo Chinchón, MD, doctorchinchon@gmail.com
Eduardo Chinchón, MD
- Recruiting
Hospital Padre Hurtado
Santiago
Sofia Leighton, MD, sofia.leighton@gmail.com
Sofia Leighton, MD
- Recruiting
Hospital Santiago Oriente Dr. Luis Tizné Brousse
Santiago
Marco Antonio Merino, MD, marco.merino.uribe@gmail.com
Marco Antonio Merino, MD
- Recruiting
Hospital Dr. Hernán Henríquez Aravena
Temuco
Jaime Contreras, MD, jaime.contreras.bizama@gmail.com
Jaime Contreras, MD
- Recruiting
Hospital Carlos Van Buren
Valparaíso
Romyna Baghetti, MD, Romyna.baghetti@gmail.com
Romyna Baghetti@gmail.com, MD
Argentina6 sites, 6 recruiting
- Recruiting
Hospital Britanico
Buenos Aires
Facundo Bianchini, MD, facu.bianchini@hotmail.com
Facundo Bianchini, MD
- Recruiting
Sanatorio Güemes
Buenos Aires
Ignacio Romero, MD, dr.ignacio.romero@gmail.com
Ignacio Romero, MD
- Recruiting
Sanatorio Mitre
Buenos Aires
Maria Lucia Gimenez, MD, gimenezmarialucia@hotmail.com
Maria Lucia Gimenez, MD
- Recruiting
Hospital San Martin de la Plata, Argentina
La Plata
Mauricio Gastón Nucciarone, MD, mauricionucciarone@gmail.com
Mauricio Gastón Nucciarone, MD
- Recruiting
Hospital Vera Barros
La Rioja
Evangelina Zamora, MD, evangepz@hotmail.com
Evangelina Zamora, MD
- Recruiting
Hospital Privado de comunidad
Mar del Plata
Mariano Esperatti, MD, marianoesperatti@gmail.com
Mariano Esperatti, MD
Mexico5 sites, 5 recruiting
- Recruiting
Hospital Civil Fray Antonio Alcalde
Guadalajara
Miguel Ibarra, MD, drmiguelibarra@hotmail.com
Miguel Ibarra, MD
- Recruiting
Hospital Juárez de México
Mexico City
José Carlos Gasca, MD, pepeska01@hotmail.com
Jose Carlos Gasca, MD
- Recruiting
Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán
Mexico City
Silvio Antonio Ñamendys-Silva, MD, snamendys@gmail.com
Silvio Antonio Ñamendys-Silva, MD
- Recruiting
Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias
Mexico City
Irene Balam, MD, irenebalara@gmail.com
Irene Balam, MD
- Recruiting
Hospital General San Juan del Río
Querétaro
Orlando Orlando, MD, orlando_rpn@hotmail.com
Orlando Orlando, MD
Uruguay2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Recruiting
Hospital Español
Montevideo
Nicolas Nin, MD, niconin@hotmail.com
Nicolas Nin, MD
- Recruiting
Hospital Pasteur
Montevideo
Julio Pontet, MD, jpontet2003@gmail.com
Julio Pontet, MD
Colombia1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Clínica Universidad de La Sabana y Unisabana Center for Translational Science (UCTS) de la Universidad de La Sabana
Cundinamarca
Luis Felipe Reyes, MD, luis.reyes5@unisabana.edu.co
Luis Felipe Reyes, MD
Ecuador1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Hospital Eugenio Espejo
Quito
Manuel Jibaja, MD, mjibaja79@gmail.com
Manuel Jibaja, MD
About this study
Official title: Effect of Continuous Prolonged Prone Position Versus Intermittent Daily Prone Position on Mortality in ARDS Patients: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
Prone position (placing the patient on his abdomen) has been shown to be an effective intervention to decrease mortality in adults connected to mechanical ventilation for moderate to severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS). Patients may require one or more sessions of prone position. However, the optimal duration of prone sessions is unknown. The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if applying prone position in prolonged sessions (> 48 hours - prolonged prone position) is more effective than applying it in daily sessions (16 to 24 hours - intermittent prone position). The trial will also learn about the safety of prolonged prone position compared to intermittent prone position. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Does prolonged prone position increase survival compared to intermittent prone position in participants with moderate to severe ARDS ?
- How does prolonged prone position compare to intermittent prone position in terms of medical problems associated to prone position ?
Read more
Researchers will compare prolonged versus intermittent prone position to see which approach is better to treat moderate to severe ARDS.
Participants will:
- Receive prone position either in prolonged (> 48 hours) or daily (16 to 24 hours) sessions during the first 7 days
- Be followed for up to 90 days to assess their clinical evolution
Read the detailed description
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is a severe condition with a 40% mortality rate. The management of ARDS still relies largely on supportive therapy. The cornerstone of this support is protective mechanical ventilation to prevent ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). For patients with moderate-to- severe forms of ARDS, specifically mechanically ventilated patients with PaO2/FiO2 ratios below 150, the use of prone position has shown to be a fundamental intervention which became one of the most relevant pillars of the ICU management during the Covid-19 pandemics. Several studies have shown that prone position not only improves oxygenation, but can attenuate the mechanisms of VILI, which would explain its benefit in terms of mortality. The physiologic benefits of prone position are progressive along time, but they can be lost rapidly after returning to supìne position.
Since the publication of the landmark PROSEVA study (Guerin 2013), which showed that ventilating patients in prone position decreased mortality, the standard approach to prone position has been the use of daily sessions of 16 to 20 hours. With this approach most patients usually require 3 to 4 prone sessions (intermittent daily prone position). However, due to the excessive workload of ICU staff during the Covid-19 pandemics, several centers decided to extend the sessions beyond 24 hours to decrease the frequency of position changes in patients with Covid-19 associated ARDS. Several centers reported their experience with prolonged sessions showing that it was feasible and that the rate of adverse events appeared to be similar to those previously reported with the standard daily sessions. The largest experience reported up to now was a retrospective study which included 417 patients from 15 centers in Chile, where a continuous prolonged prone position was applied as a nationwide strategy (Cornejo 2022). Most patients required a single prone session of 4 (3-5) days. Although the study lacked a control group, the mortality and rate of adverse events was rather low compared to other series of patients with similar characteristics. A non-randomized controlled study from 3 hospital in US even showed that compared to patients treated with standard prone sessions (< 24 hours), patients treated with prolonged sessions had a lower risk of mortality (Okin 2023). However, other reports have shown conflicting results regarding the potential benefit associated to prolonging prone position sessions beyond 24 hours. Recent guidelines have acknowledged that the optimal duration of prone position sessions is unknown and must be further investigated (Grasselli 2023). Prolonging prone position sessions may ensure that this lung protective intervention is maintained throughout the acute phase of ARDS.
The goal of the present study is to compare the effects of a continuous prolonged prone position versus an intermittent daily prone position on mortality and other relevant outcomes, as well as on the incidence of adverse events potentially related to prone position, in mechanically ventilated patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS.
The study will be a randomized, multicenter, two-arm parallel-group, investigator-led clinical trial with allocation concealment and intention-to-treat analysis. Patients allocated to the experimental arm (prolonged prone position) will receive prone position sessions for a minimum of 48 hours, which will be further extended until PaO2/FiO2 is ≥ 200, or until reaching the maximum of 120 hours. Patients allocated to the control arm (intermittent prone position) will receive prone position sessions for a minimum of 16 hours and a maximum of 24 hours. In both groups prone sessions may be repeated if PaO2/FiO2 ratio falls below 150 after being returned to supine position during the first 7 days (intervention period).
- Conditions
- Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
- Being tested
- Daily prone position sessions, Prolonged prone position sessions
- Keywords
- ACUTE RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME, RESPIRATORY FAILURE, PRONE POSITION, MECHANICAL VENTILATION
- Medical subject headings
- Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Respiratory Insufficiency
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Daily prone position sessionsProcedure or surgery
Prone position sessions will be extended at least 16 hours, but no longer than 24 hours. Prone sessions will be repeated if PaO2/FiO2 ratio decreases to < 150 after returning to supine position within the first 7 days after randomization. The extension of repeated prone sessions will follow the same criteria.
Prolonged prone position sessionsProcedure or surgery
Prone position sessions will be extended at least 48 hours AND until PaO2/FiO2 ratio is ≥ 200, but no longer than 120 hours. Prone sessions will be repeated if PaO2/FiO2 ratio decreases to < 150 after returning to supine position within the first 7 days after randomization. The extension of repeated prone sessions will follow the same criteria.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intermittent Prone Position | Active comparator | This arm will receive prone position sessions as applied in the PROSEVA trial (Guerin 2013) Receives: Procedure: Daily prone position sessions |
| Prolonged Prone Position | Experimental | This arm will receive prone position sessions as applied in a previous multicenter study during the COVID-19 pandemics (Cornejo 2022) Receives: Procedure: Prolonged prone position sessions |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
28-day mortality
All-cause mortality
Measured: 28 days
Secondary outcomes (3)
90-day mortality
All-cause mortality
Measured: 90 days
Ventilator-free days
Days-free from mechanical ventilation and alive up to day 28
Measured: 28 days
Hospital-free days at day 28
Days-free from Hospital and alive up to day 28
Measured: 28 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Mar 2025
- Study start7 Apr 2025
- Primary completionOct 2027 (estimated)
- Study completionJan 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Pontificia Universidad Catolica de ChileThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Study do not use Drug, Biological/Vaccine, or Combination Product.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 780 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Hospital do Coracao, Fundacion Clinica Valle del Lili, Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico, Chile
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Alejandro Bruhn, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de ChileRodrigo Cornejo, MD, MBA, Study director, University of Chile
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06854627
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 230606007
- Acronym
- ePRONE
- Status last verified
- Apr 2026
- First submitted
- 21 Jan 2025
- Last updated
- 18 May 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: anonymized data will be shared among reasonable request to the corresponding author.
Publications
Cornejo RA, Montoya J, Gajardo AIJ, Graf J, Alegria L, Baghetti R, Irarrazaval A, Santis C, Pavez N, Leighton S, Tomicic V, Morales D, Ruiz C, Navarrete P, Vargas P, Galvez R, Espinosa V, Lazo M, Perez-Araos RA, Garay O, Sepulveda P, Martinez E, Bruhn A; SOCHIMI Prone-COVID-19 Group. Continuous prolonged prone positioning in COVID-19-related ARDS: a multicenter cohort study from Chile. Ann Intensive Care. 2022 Nov 28;12(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s13613-022-01082-w.
PubMed 36441352Guerin C, Reignier J, Richard JC, Beuret P, Gacouin A, Boulain T, Mercier E, Badet M, Mercat A, Baudin O, Clavel M, Chatellier D, Jaber S, Rosselli S, Mancebo J, Sirodot M, Hilbert G, Bengler C, Richecoeur J, Gainnier M, Bayle F, Bourdin G, Leray V, Girard R, Baboi L, Ayzac L; PROSEVA Study Group. Prone positioning in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2013 Jun 6;368(23):2159-68. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1214103. Epub 2013 May 20.
PubMed 23688302Grasselli G, Calfee CS, Camporota L, Poole D, Amato MBP, Antonelli M, Arabi YM, Baroncelli F, Beitler JR, Bellani G, Bellingan G, Blackwood B, Bos LDJ, Brochard L, Brodie D, Burns KEA, Combes A, D'Arrigo S, De Backer D, Demoule A, Einav S, Fan E, Ferguson ND, Frat JP, Gattinoni L, Guerin C, Herridge MS, Hodgson C, Hough CL, Jaber S, Juffermans NP, Karagiannidis C, Kesecioglu J, Kwizera A, Laffey JG, Mancebo J, Matthay MA, McAuley DF, Mercat A, Meyer NJ, Moss M, Munshi L, Myatra SN, Ng Gong M, Papazian L, Patel BK, Pellegrini M, Perner A, Pesenti A, Piquilloud L, Qiu H, Ranieri MV, Riviello E, Slutsky AS, Stapleton RD, Summers C, Thompson TB, Valente Barbas CS, Villar J, Ware LB, Weiss B, Zampieri FG, Azoulay E, Cecconi M; European Society of Intensive Care Medicine Taskforce on ARDS. ESICM guidelines on acute respiratory distress syndrome: definition, phenotyping and respiratory support strategies. Intensive Care Med. 2023 Jul;49(7):727-759. doi: 10.1007/s00134-023-07050-7. Epub 2023 Jun 16.
PubMed 37326646Okin D, Huang CY, Alba GA, Jesudasen SJ, Dandawate NA, Gavralidis A, Chang LL, Moin EE, Ahmad I, Witkin AS, Hardin CC, Hibbert KA, Kadar A, Gordan PL, Lee H, Thompson BT, Bebell LM, Lai PS. Prolonged Prone Position Ventilation Is Associated With Reduced Mortality in Intubated COVID-19 Patients. Chest. 2023 Mar;163(3):533-542. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2022.10.034. Epub 2022 Nov 4.
PubMed 36343687
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 May 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effect of Continuous Prolonged Prone Position Versus Intermittent Daily Prone Position on Mortality in ARDS Patients: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06854627
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ePRONE / 230606007
- Conditions
- Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
- Keywords
- ACUTE RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME, RESPIRATORY FAILURE, PRONE POSITION, MECHANICAL VENTILATION
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 780 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Pontificia Universidad Catolica de ChileUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Hospital do Coracao, Fundacion Clinica Valle del Lili, Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico, Chile
- Study start
- 7 Apr 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Oct 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jan 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 3 Mar 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Prone position (placing the patient on his abdomen) has been shown to be an effective intervention to decrease mortality in adults connected to mechanical ventilation for moderate to severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS). Patients may require one or more sessions of prone position. However, the optimal duration of prone sessions is unknown. The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if applying prone position in prolonged sessions (> 48 hours - prolonged prone position) is more effective than applying it in daily sessions (16 to 24 hours - intermittent prone position). The trial will also learn about the safety of prolonged prone position compared to intermittent prone position. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Does prolonged prone position increase survival compared to intermittent prone position in participants with moderate to severe ARDS ?
- How does prolonged prone position compare to intermittent prone position in terms of medical problems associated to prone position ?
Researchers will compare prolonged versus intermittent prone position to see which approach is better to treat moderate to severe ARDS.
Participants will:
- Receive prone position either in prolonged (> 48 hours) or daily (16 to 24 hours) sessions during the first 7 days
- Be followed for up to 90 days to assess their clinical evolution
Detailed description
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is a severe condition with a 40% mortality rate. The management of ARDS still relies largely on supportive therapy. The cornerstone of this support is protective mechanical ventilation to prevent ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). For patients with moderate-to- severe forms of ARDS, specifically mechanically ventilated patients with PaO2/FiO2 ratios below 150, the use of prone position has shown to be a fundamental intervention which became one of the most relevant pillars of the ICU management during the Covid-19 pandemics. Several studies have shown that prone position not only improves oxygenation, but can attenuate the mechanisms of VILI, which would explain its benefit in terms of mortality. The physiologic benefits of prone position are progressive along time, but they can be lost rapidly after returning to supìne position.
Since the publication of the landmark PROSEVA study (Guerin 2013), which showed that ventilating patients in prone position decreased mortality, the standard approach to prone position has been the use of daily sessions of 16 to 20 hours. With this approach most patients usually require 3 to 4 prone sessions (intermittent daily prone position). However, due to the excessive workload of ICU staff during the Covid-19 pandemics, several centers decided to extend the sessions beyond 24 hours to decrease the frequency of position changes in patients with Covid-19 associated ARDS. Several centers reported their experience with prolonged sessions showing that it was feasible and that the rate of adverse events appeared to be similar to those previously reported with the standard daily sessions. The largest experience reported up to now was a retrospective study which included 417 patients from 15 centers in Chile, where a continuous prolonged prone position was applied as a nationwide strategy (Cornejo 2022). Most patients required a single prone session of 4 (3-5) days. Although the study lacked a control group, the mortality and rate of adverse events was rather low compared to other series of patients with similar characteristics. A non-randomized controlled study from 3 hospital in US even showed that compared to patients treated with standard prone sessions (< 24 hours), patients treated with prolonged sessions had a lower risk of mortality (Okin 2023). However, other reports have shown conflicting results regarding the potential benefit associated to prolonging prone position sessions beyond 24 hours. Recent guidelines have acknowledged that the optimal duration of prone position sessions is unknown and must be further investigated (Grasselli 2023). Prolonging prone position sessions may ensure that this lung protective intervention is maintained throughout the acute phase of ARDS.
The goal of the present study is to compare the effects of a continuous prolonged prone position versus an intermittent daily prone position on mortality and other relevant outcomes, as well as on the incidence of adverse events potentially related to prone position, in mechanically ventilated patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS.
The study will be a randomized, multicenter, two-arm parallel-group, investigator-led clinical trial with allocation concealment and intention-to-treat analysis. Patients allocated to the experimental arm (prolonged prone position) will receive prone position sessions for a minimum of 48 hours, which will be further extended until PaO2/FiO2 is ≥ 200, or until reaching the maximum of 120 hours. Patients allocated to the control arm (intermittent prone position) will receive prone position sessions for a minimum of 16 hours and a maximum of 24 hours. In both groups prone sessions may be repeated if PaO2/FiO2 ratio falls below 150 after being returned to supine position during the first 7 days (intervention period).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Study do not use Drug, Biological/Vaccine, or Combination Product.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intermittent Prone Position | Active comparator | Procedure: Daily prone position sessionsThis arm will receive prone position sessions as applied in the PROSEVA trial (Guerin 2013) |
| Prolonged Prone Position | Experimental | Procedure: Prolonged prone position sessionsThis arm will receive prone position sessions as applied in a previous multicenter study during the COVID-19 pandemics (Cornejo 2022) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation for less than 72 hours
- Moderate-severe ARDS defined as:
- Prone positioning has been indicated by the attending physician, OR has already been initiated within the last 16 hours
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Contraindications for prone positioning such as intracranial pressure > 20 mmHg, massive hemoptysis, recent tracheal surgery or sternotomy or abdominal surgery with an open wound, recent facial trauma or facial surgery, unstable spine, femur, or pelvic fractures, or a single anterior chest tube with air leaks
- Patient on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) before randomization
- Chronic respiratory failure requiring oxygen therapy or non-invasive ventilation (NIV)
- Known pregnancy
- Anticipating withdrawal of life support or shift to palliative care
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Daily prone position sessionsProne position sessions will be extended at least 16 hours, but no longer than 24 hours. Prone sessions will be repeated if PaO2/FiO2 ratio decreases to < 150 after returning to supine position within the first 7 days after randomization. The extension of repeated prone sessions will follow the same criteria. | Procedure or surgery | Intermittent Prone Position |
| Prolonged prone position sessionsProne position sessions will be extended at least 48 hours AND until PaO2/FiO2 ratio is ≥ 200, but no longer than 120 hours. Prone sessions will be repeated if PaO2/FiO2 ratio decreases to < 150 after returning to supine position within the first 7 days after randomization. The extension of repeated prone sessions will follow the same criteria. | Procedure or surgery | Prolonged Prone Position |
Primary outcome
28-day mortality
Time frame: 28 days
All-cause mortality
3 secondary outcomes
90-day mortality
Time frame: 90 days
Ventilator-free days
Time frame: 28 days
Hospital-free days at day 28
Time frame: 28 days
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 May 2026.
- Background: PubMed 36441352Cornejo RA, Montoya J, Gajardo AIJ, Graf J, Alegria L, Baghetti R, Irarrazaval A, Santis C, Pavez N, Leighton S, Tomicic V, Morales D, Ruiz C, Navarrete P, Vargas P, Galvez R, Espinosa V, Lazo M, Perez-Araos RA, Garay O, Sepulveda P, Martinez E, Bruhn A; SOCHIMI Prone-COVID-19 Group. Continuous prolonged prone positioning in COVID-19-related ARDS: a multicenter cohort study from Chile. Ann Intensive Care. 2022 Nov 28;12(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s13613-022-01082-w.
- Background: PubMed 23688302Guerin C, Reignier J, Richard JC, Beuret P, Gacouin A, Boulain T, Mercier E, Badet M, Mercat A, Baudin O, Clavel M, Chatellier D, Jaber S, Rosselli S, Mancebo J, Sirodot M, Hilbert G, Bengler C, Richecoeur J, Gainnier M, Bayle F, Bourdin G, Leray V, Girard R, Baboi L, Ayzac L; PROSEVA Study Group. Prone positioning in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2013 Jun 6;368(23):2159-68. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1214103. Epub 2013 May 20.
- Background: PubMed 37326646Grasselli G, Calfee CS, Camporota L, Poole D, Amato MBP, Antonelli M, Arabi YM, Baroncelli F, Beitler JR, Bellani G, Bellingan G, Blackwood B, Bos LDJ, Brochard L, Brodie D, Burns KEA, Combes A, D'Arrigo S, De Backer D, Demoule A, Einav S, Fan E, Ferguson ND, Frat JP, Gattinoni L, Guerin C, Herridge MS, Hodgson C, Hough CL, Jaber S, Juffermans NP, Karagiannidis C, Kesecioglu J, Kwizera A, Laffey JG, Mancebo J, Matthay MA, McAuley DF, Mercat A, Meyer NJ, Moss M, Munshi L, Myatra SN, Ng Gong M, Papazian L, Patel BK, Pellegrini M, Perner A, Pesenti A, Piquilloud L, Qiu H, Ranieri MV, Riviello E, Slutsky AS, Stapleton RD, Summers C, Thompson TB, Valente Barbas CS, Villar J, Ware LB, Weiss B, Zampieri FG, Azoulay E, Cecconi M; European Society of Intensive Care Medicine Taskforce on ARDS. ESICM guidelines on acute respiratory distress syndrome: definition, phenotyping and respiratory support strategies. Intensive Care Med. 2023 Jul;49(7):727-759. doi: 10.1007/s00134-023-07050-7. Epub 2023 Jun 16.
- Background: PubMed 36343687Okin D, Huang CY, Alba GA, Jesudasen SJ, Dandawate NA, Gavralidis A, Chang LL, Moin EE, Ahmad I, Witkin AS, Hardin CC, Hibbert KA, Kadar A, Gordan PL, Lee H, Thompson BT, Bebell LM, Lai PS. Prolonged Prone Position Ventilation Is Associated With Reduced Mortality in Intubated COVID-19 Patients. Chest. 2023 Mar;163(3):533-542. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2022.10.034. Epub 2022 Nov 4.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. anonymized data will be shared among reasonable request to the corresponding author.
Related trials for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Longitudinal Recovery Trajectories After an Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, a New Understanding
ARDS, ARDS Disease Progression
RecruitingObservational study
Respiratory Distress and Elective Cesarean Section at Term
Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
Little Lungs Study
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation, Severe Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Evaluating AVM0703 for Treatment of COVID-19 or Influenza-mediated ARDS
ARDS, Covid19
RecruitingObservational study
Pulse Wave vs. Saline Contrast EIT for Pulmonary Perfusion in ARDS
ARDS (Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome), Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Alejandro Bruhn, MD, PhD principal investigator
Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile
Rodrigo Cornejo, MD, MBA study director
University of Chile
38 sites in 6 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Daily prone position sessions and Prolonged prone position sessions in people with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, run by Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile at 38 sites in 6 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 38 sites in Chile, Argentina, Mexico, Uruguay, Colombia and 1 more country. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Alejandro Bruhn, MD, PhD (+56223543292, abruhn@uc.cl), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
28-day mortality (time frame: 28 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06854627, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 May 2026.