ObesityROBOBARNCT06858761
Health-economic Assessment of Robot-assisted Bariatric Surgery
A study testing Robot-assisted surgical strategy, Conventional laparoscopic surgical strategy and Visual analog scale in people with Obesity, run by Hospices Civils de Lyon at 18 sites in France.
Trial summary
CONTEXT : Obesity is a serious disease which affects 17% of the french population. Bariatric and metabolic surgery has demonstrated its efficiency and remains the treatment of reference. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Obesity
- What is being tested?
- Robot-assisted surgical strategy, Conventional laparoscopic surgical strategy and Visual analog scale
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 482 participants
- Where
- 18 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- 25 Jul 2025to Jul 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patient aged between 18 and 70 years old,
- Female or male patients
- Patient eligible for one of the two situations defined below:
- Primary bariatric or metabolic surgery, with a BMI corresponding to one of the 3 following situations, in accordance with the french National Authority for Health (HAS) recommendations published in February 2024:
- 40 kg/m² OR
- 35 kg/m² with at least one comorbidity that may improve after surgery (e.g.: high blood pressure, sleep apnea syndrome and other severe respiratory disorders, type 2 diabetes, disabling osteoarticular diseases, steatohepatitis not alcoholic, dyslipidemia, osteoarthritis) OR between 30 and 35 kg/m² with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes
Show all 9Show fewer
- Revision surgery for complication and/or side effects of a previous bariatric surgery
- Patient who has benefited from a pluridisciplinary evaluation (medical, surgical, psychiatric), with a favorable opinion for a bariatric.
- Patient who agrees to be included in the study and who signs the informed consent form,
Who cannot join
- Presence of a severe and evolutive life threatening pathology, unrelated to obesity,
- Pregnancy or desire to be pregnant during the study,
- Patient not affiliated to a French or European healthcare insurance,
- Patient under supervision or guardianship
- Patient who is unable to give consent,
- Patient who does not understand French
- Patient who has already been included in a trial which has a conflict of interests with the present study
Trial locations and contacts
18 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
18 sites in 1 country
France18 sites, 18 recruiting
- Recruiting
Département de chirurgie digestive et endocrinienne Groupe Hospitalier Pellegrin Place Amélie Raba Léon 33076 BORDEAUX
Bordeaux, 33076
Caroline GRONNIER, MD PhD, +33 5 57 65 60 05, caroline.gronnier@chu-bordeaux.fr
Caroline GRONNIER, MD PhD
- Recruiting
Département de chirurgie digestive CHRU Dijon - Hôpital Le Bocage Bd du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny 21000 DIJON
Dijon, 21000
Olivier FACY, MD PhD, +33 03.80.29.37.47, olivier.facy@chu-dijon.Fr
Olivier FACY, MD PhD
- Recruiting
Digestive Surgery Department CHU Grenoble BP217 - 38043 GRENOBLE Cedex 09
Grenoble, 38043
Fabian RECHE, MD PhD, +33 4 76 76 54 28, FReche@chu-grenoble.fr
Fabian RECHE, MD PhD
- Recruiting
Service de Chirurgie Générale et Digestive Grand Hopital de l'Est Francilien Site de Marne La Vallée 2-4 Cours de la Gondoire 77600 JOSSIGNY
Jossigny, 77600
Alexandre CORTES, MD PhD, +33 1 61 10 71 64, acortes@ghef.fr
Alexandre CORTES, MD PhD
- Recruiting
Service de Chirurgie Générale et Endocrinienne CHU de Lille - Hôpital Claude Huriez 1 rue Michel Polonovski 59000 LILLE
Lille, 59000
Robert CAIAZZO, MD PhD, +33 3 20 44 55 16, robert.caiazzo@chru-lille.fr
Robert CAIAZZO, MD PhD
- Recruiting
Hospices Civils de Lyon - Hôpital Edouard Herriot Chirurgie Digestive et Bariatrique 5 Place d'Arsonval - 69437 Lyon Cedex 03 - FRANCE
Lyon, 69437
Maud ROBERT, Professor, +33 4 72 11 62 63, maud.robert@chu-lyon.fr
Maud ROBERT, Professor
- Recruiting
Service de Chirurgie Digestive, Hôpital Européen de Marseille, 6 rue Désirée Clary, 13003 MARSEILLE
Marseille, 13003
Lysa MACRON, MD
Lysa MACRON, MD
- Recruiting
Département de chirurgie digestive et bariatrique CHU de Nantes - Site Hôtel-Dieu - HME 1 Place Alexis Ricordeau 44000 NANTES
Nantes, 44000
Claire BLANCHARD, MD PhD, +33 2 40 08 33 33, claire.blanchard@chu-nantes.fr
Claire BLANCHARD, MD PhD
- Not yet recruiting
Service de Chirurgie Digestive et Transplantation Hépatique, Hôpital de l'Archet 2, CHU de Nice
Nice, 06202
Imed BEN AMOR, MD
Imed BEN AMOR, MD
- Recruiting
Département de Chirurgie digestive Hôpital de la Source CHU d'ORLEANS 14 Avenue de l'hôpital 45100 ORLEANS LA SOURCE
Orléans, 45100
Adel ABOU-MRAD FRICQUEGNON, MD PhD, +33 2 38 22 95 10, adel.abou-mrad@chr-orleans.fr
Adel ABOU-MRAD FRICQUEGNON, MD, PHD
- Recruiting
Service de Chirurgie Digestive Hépato-bilio-pancréatique et Transplantation Hépatique Chirurgie Bariatrique, coelioscopique et robotique AP-HP - Hôpital Universitaire La Pitié Salpêtrière 47-83 boulevard de l'hôpital 75013 PARIS
Paris, 75013
Adriana TORCIVIA, MD PhD, +33 1 42 17 56 44, adriana.torcivia@aphp.fr
Adriana TORCIVIA, MD PhD
- Recruiting
Département de chirurgie digestive, oncologique et bariatrique AP-HP - Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou 20 rue Leblanc 75015 PARIS
Paris, 75015
Lionel REBIBO, MD PhD, +33 1 56 09 58 68, lionel.rebibo@aphp.fr
Lionel REBIBO, MD PhD
- Recruiting
Département de chirurgie digestive, œsogastrique et bariatrique AP-HP - Hôpital Bichat - Claude-Bernard 46 Rue Henri Huchard 75018 PARIS
Paris, 75018
Tigran POGHOSYAN, MD PhD, +33 1 40 25 82 39, tigran.poghosyan@aphp.fr
Tigran POGHOSYAN, MD PhD
- Recruiting
Département de chirurgie viscérale CHU de Poitiers 2 Rue de la Miletrie - CS 90577 - 86000 POITIERS
Poitiers, 86000
Jean-Pierre FAURE, MD PhD, +33 5.49.44.39.14, jean-pierre.FAURE@chu-poitiers.fr
Jean-Pierre FAURE, MD PhD
- Recruiting
Clinique Chirurgicale Mutualiste 3 rue le verrier - BP 209 42100 SAINT ETIENNE
Saint-Etienne, 42100
Pierre BLANC, MD PhD, +33 4 77 81 82 88, PBLANC@mutualite-loire.com
Pierre BLANC, MD, PHD
- Recruiting
Département de chirurgie digestive et endocrinienne CHU de Strasbourg - Nouvel Hôpital civil Rez-de-chaussée 1 place de l'hôpital BP 426 67091 STRASBOURG cedex
Strasbourg, 67091
Elisa REITANO, MD
Elisa REITANO, MD
- Recruiting
Service de Chirurgie Digestive Hôpital Rangueil - CHU de Toulouse 1 avenue du Pr Jean Poulhès - TSA 50032 31059 TOULOUSE Cedex 9
Toulouse, 31059
Géraud TUYERAS, MD PhD, +33 5 61 32 34 20, tuyeras.g@chu-toulouse.fr
Géraud TUYERAS, MD PhD
- Recruiting
Département de Chirurgie Viscérale Métabolique et Cancérologique Responsable de l'Unité de Chirurgie Endocrinienne Université de Lorraine CHRU de Nancy - Hôpital Brabois adultes 11 allée du Morvan 54511 VANDOEUVRE LES NANCY
Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, 54511
Claire NOMINE-CRIQUI, MD PhD, +33 3 83 15 71 43, c.nomine-criqui@chru-nancy.fr
Claire NOMINE-CRIQUI, MD PhD
About this study
Official title: Health Economic Impact of Robot-assisted Bariatric Surgery vs Conventional Laparoscopy: Prospective Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
CONTEXT :
Obesity is a serious disease which affects 17% of the french population. Bariatric and metabolic surgery has demonstrated its efficiency and remains the treatment of reference. Over 40,000 bariatric procedures are performed per year, mainly by laparoscopy ; the robotic approach, historically developed by Intuitive Surgical increases rapidly and accounts for 18% of the procedures in the public system. Whereas the robotic approach has demonstrated its superiority toward laparoscopy for prostatectomies and rectal resections, it still has to be demonstrated for bariatric surgery ; some studies report a decrease rate of complications for complexe procedures and selected patients but the literature remains variable and the benefit of the robot in relation to its high cost must be confirmed.
Read more
OBJECTIVES:
To conduct a health-economic assessment (i.e. cost-effectiveness ratio expressed as the additional cost per quality adjusted life-year gained) of the Da Vinci robot in bariatric surgery at 1 year, from the Health Care system point of view.
METHOD :
Randomized (482 patients), controlled, single-blind, multicenter, superiority trial comparing two approaches for primary or revisional bariatric surgery: a group benefiting from a robotic approach and a reference group benefiting from a laparoscopic approach. Data from the trial will be matched via the social security number to the French National Health Insurance Information System (SNDS database) in order to collect care consumption. The quality of life will be assessed using the EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ5D-5L) questionnaire.
PERSPECTIVES:
This study will have a direct impact on patients care, professional practices and public health policy either by validating the value of the robot in bariatric surgery or conversely, by promoting the laparoscopic approach.
HYPOTHESIS :
Robot-assisted bariatric surgery is more expensive than conventional laparoscopy, but the additional costs associated with the robot are partly offset by a reduction in post-operative complications at 1 year, which should also help to improve patients' quality of life.
- Conditions
- Obesity
- Being tested
- Robot-assisted surgical strategy, Conventional laparoscopic surgical strategy, Visual analog scale, EQ-5D-5L questionnaire, Impact of Weight on Quality of Life (IWQOL) questionnaire
- Keywords
- Obesity, Bariatric surgery, Robot
- Medical subject headings
- Obesity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Robot-assisted surgical strategyProcedure or surgery
Primary or revision bariatric surgery (for complications or side effects of a previous surgery), using a robotic approach. The robot used will be the Da Vinci X or Xi model (depending on the center) from the company Intuitive Surgical.
Conventional laparoscopic surgical strategyProcedure or surgery
Primary or revision bariatric surgery (for complications or side effects of a previous surgery), using a conventional laparoscopic approach
Visual analog scaleOther
All patients will have pain evaluation with visual analog scale
EQ-5D-5L questionnaireOther
All patients will have quality of life assessment with EQ-5D-5L questionnaire
Impact of Weight on Quality of Life (IWQOL) questionnaireOther
All patients will have Quality of life assessment with IWQOL questionnaire
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Robot-assisted surgical strategy | Experimental | Primary bariatric surgery (According to the recommendations of the High Authority of Health: patient with a BMI ≥40 kg/m2 and/or BMI ≥35 kg/m2 associated with at least one comorbidity and/or BMI between 30 and 35 kg/m2 and suffering from type 2 diabetes) or revision bariatric surgery (for complications or side effects of a previous surgery), using a robotic approach. Receives: Procedure: Robot-assisted surgical strategy; Other: Visual analog scale; Other: EQ-5D-5L questionnaire; Other: Impact of Weight on Quality of Life (IWQOL) questionnaire |
| Conventional laparoscopic surgical strategy | Active comparator | Primary bariatric surgery (According to the recommendations of the High Authority of Health: patient with a BMI ≥40 kg/m2 and/or BMI ≥35 kg/m2 associated with at least one comorbidity and/or BMI between 30 and 35 kg/m2 and suffering from type 2 diabetes) or revision bariatric surgery (for complications or side effects of a previous surgery), using a conventional laparoscopic approach. Receives: Procedure: Conventional laparoscopic surgical strategy; Other: Visual analog scale; Other: EQ-5D-5L questionnaire; Other: Impact of Weight on Quality of Life (IWQOL) questionnaire |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Incremental cost-effectivEness ratio (ICER)
Ratio expressed as additional cost per Quality Adjusted Life Year gained (cost/QALY) calculated from:
- Survival and quality of life data (EQ-5D-5L questionnaire)
- Cost data (micro-costing) and by individual matching with the French National Health Insurance Information System (SNDS database)
Measured: 1 year after surgery
Secondary outcomes (20)
Number, type and severity of intraoperative complications
Number, type (medical or surgical) and severity of intraoperative complications (during surgery) for each procedure according to the Dindo-Clavien classification.
Measured: End of the surgery
Number, type and severity of postoperative complications
Number, type (medical or surgical) and severity of complications (within 1 year after surgery) for each procedure according to the Dindo-Clavien classification
Measured: 1, 3 and 12 months after surgery
Pain assessment
Pain will be assessed 1 day, 2 days and 1 month after surgery, according to a visual analogic scale (VAS).
The VAS measures the intensity of pain on a scale from 0 to 10. 0 representing no pain and at the opposite end, 10 representing extreme pain
Measured: 1 day, 2 days and 1 month after surgery
Readmission rate
Number of patients readmitted within 1 year after surgery.
Measured: 1, 3 and 12 months after surgery
Reintervention rate
Number of patients for whom reintervention was necessary within 1 year after surgery.
Measured: 1, 3 and 12 months after surgery
Quality of life assessment with EQ-5D-5L questionnaire
This questionnaire is divided into 2 parts:
A first part with the questions called "EQ-5D descriptive system", representing 5 dimensions: Mobility, Personal autonomy, Current activities, Pain and discomfort, Anxiety and depression. The response is based on 5-point scales (1: no problem; 2: mild problems; 3: moderate problems; 4: severe problems; 5: extreme problems or total incapacity).
This part is completed by a visual analog scale, called "EQ-5D VAS". It consists of a 20 cm line, graduated from 0 to 100, where the patient must indicate how they evaluate their current state of health, 0 being the worst possible state and 100 the best
Measured: Before surgery and at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery
Quality of life assessment with IWQOL questionnaire
This questionnaire includes five health concepts: mobility, self-esteem, social life, working conditions and sex life. Five answers will be offered to patients for each item and each answer will be assigned a score ranging from 1 to 5. The most pejorative score is 155.
Measured: Before surgery and at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery
Duration of surgery
Operative time expressed in minutes
Measured: End of the surgery
Length of hospital stay
The Length of stay (in days) is based on the number of days of hospitalization from surgery (day of surgery = D0) until the day of discharge
Measured: at hospital discharge, an average of 3 days +- 2 days
Readmission rate in High Dependency unit and/or intensive care unit
Number of patients for whom readmission rate in High Dependency unit and/or intensive care unit was necessary within 1 years after surgery.
Measured: Within 12 months after surgery
Cost of the initial hospital stay
the cost of the initial surgical stay for each group will be calculated using the micro-costing method
Measured: at hospital discharge, an average of 3 days +- 2 days
ICER in subgroup of patients with preoperative BMI < 50 versus patients with preoperative BMI > 50 kg/m2
Ratio expressed as additional cost per Quality Adjusted Life Year gained (cost/QALY)
Measured: 12 months after surgery
ICER in subgroup of patients age > 60 years old versus patients age < 60 years
Ratio expressed as additional cost per Quality Adjusted Life Year gained (cost/QALY)
Measured: 12 months after surgery
ICER in subgroup of patients with primary surgery versus patients with revisional surgery
Ratio expressed as additional cost per Quality Adjusted Life Year gained (cost/QALY)
Measured: 12 months after surgery
ICER in subgroup of patients with restrictive surgery versus patients with malabsorptive surgery
Ratio expressed as additional cost per Quality Adjusted Life Year gained (cost/QALY)
Measured: 12 months after surgery
ICER depending on preoperative risk
Ratio expressed as additional cost per Quality Adjusted Life Year gained (cost/QALY)
Measured: 12 months after surgery
Perform a budgeT impact analysis
Financial consequences of adopting robotic from the perspective of the French public health care system at 5 years
Measured: 5-year modelling
Weight loss
Weight loss at 6 and 12 months expressed as an absolute value (aWL in kg), as a percentage of total weight loss (%TWL; [(Weight at each visit - initial weight) / (initial weight)] × 100), as a percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL; [(Weight at each visit - baseline weight) / (baseline weight - ideal weight)] × 100); as a percentage of excess BMI loss (%BMI; [(BMI at each visit - baseline BMI) / (baseline BMI - ideal BMI)] × 100, using 25 as the ideal BMI).
Measured: 6 and 12 months after surgery
Changes in treatment
Changes in treatment with antidiabetic, antihypertensive, lipid-lowering and gastro-oesophageal reflux medications
Measured: 6 and 12 months after surgery
Presence of sleep apnoea syndrome
Assessment of the presence of sleep apnoea syndrome 6 and 12 months after surgery.
Measured: 6 and 12 months after surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Mar 2025
- Study start25 Jul 2025
- Primary completionJul 2028 (estimated)
- Study completionJul 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for ObesityStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Hospices Civils de LyonThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Prospective multicenter randomized, controlled in 2 parallel groups, single-blind, superiority trial comparing 2 modalities of bariatric surgery (first-line or revision): * Robotic surgical strategy * Conventional laparoscopic surgical strategy
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 482 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hospices Civils de Lyon
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06858761
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 69HCL24_0757
- Acronym
- ROBOBAR
- Status last verified
- Jul 2026
- First submitted
- 20 Feb 2025
- Last updated
- 31 Jul 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 Jul 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Health Economic Impact of Robot-assisted Bariatric Surgery vs Conventional Laparoscopy: Prospective Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06858761
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ROBOBAR / 69HCL24_0757
- Conditions
- Obesity
- Keywords
- Obesity, Bariatric surgery, Robot
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 482 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Hospices Civils de LyonUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 25 Jul 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jul 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jul 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 5 Mar 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
CONTEXT :
Obesity is a serious disease which affects 17% of the french population. Bariatric and metabolic surgery has demonstrated its efficiency and remains the treatment of reference. Over 40,000 bariatric procedures are performed per year, mainly by laparoscopy ; the robotic approach, historically developed by Intuitive Surgical increases rapidly and accounts for 18% of the procedures in the public system. Whereas the robotic approach has demonstrated its superiority toward laparoscopy for prostatectomies and rectal resections, it still has to be demonstrated for bariatric surgery ; some studies report a decrease rate of complications for complexe procedures and selected patients but the literature remains variable and the benefit of the robot in relation to its high cost must be confirmed.
OBJECTIVES:
To conduct a health-economic assessment (i.e. cost-effectiveness ratio expressed as the additional cost per quality adjusted life-year gained) of the Da Vinci robot in bariatric surgery at 1 year, from the Health Care system point of view.
METHOD :
Randomized (482 patients), controlled, single-blind, multicenter, superiority trial comparing two approaches for primary or revisional bariatric surgery: a group benefiting from a robotic approach and a reference group benefiting from a laparoscopic approach. Data from the trial will be matched via the social security number to the French National Health Insurance Information System (SNDS database) in order to collect care consumption. The quality of life will be assessed using the EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ5D-5L) questionnaire.
PERSPECTIVES:
This study will have a direct impact on patients care, professional practices and public health policy either by validating the value of the robot in bariatric surgery or conversely, by promoting the laparoscopic approach.
HYPOTHESIS :
Robot-assisted bariatric surgery is more expensive than conventional laparoscopy, but the additional costs associated with the robot are partly offset by a reduction in post-operative complications at 1 year, which should also help to improve patients' quality of life.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Prospective multicenter randomized, controlled in 2 parallel groups, single-blind, superiority trial comparing 2 modalities of bariatric surgery (first-line or revision): * Robotic surgical strategy * Conventional laparoscopic surgical strategy
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Robot-assisted surgical strategy | Experimental | Procedure: Robot-assisted surgical strategy, Other: Visual analog scale, Other: EQ-5D-5L questionnaire, Other: Impact of Weight on Quality of Life (IWQOL) questionnairePrimary bariatric surgery (According to the recommendations of the High Authority of Health: patient with a BMI ≥40 kg/m2 and/or BMI ≥35 kg/m2 associated with at least one comorbidity and/or BMI between 30 and 35 kg/m2 and suffering from type 2 diabetes) or revision bariatric surgery (for complications or side effects of a previous surgery), using a robotic approach. |
| Conventional laparoscopic surgical strategy | Active comparator | Procedure: Conventional laparoscopic surgical strategy, Other: Visual analog scale, Other: EQ-5D-5L questionnaire, Other: Impact of Weight on Quality of Life (IWQOL) questionnairePrimary bariatric surgery (According to the recommendations of the High Authority of Health: patient with a BMI ≥40 kg/m2 and/or BMI ≥35 kg/m2 associated with at least one comorbidity and/or BMI between 30 and 35 kg/m2 and suffering from type 2 diabetes) or revision bariatric surgery (for complications or side effects of a previous surgery), using a conventional laparoscopic approach. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Patient aged between 18 and 70 years old,
- Female or male patients
- Patient eligible for one of the two situations defined below:
- Patient who has benefited from a pluridisciplinary evaluation (medical, surgical, psychiatric), with a favorable opinion for a bariatric.
- Patient who agrees to be included in the study and who signs the informed consent form,
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Presence of a severe and evolutive life threatening pathology, unrelated to obesity,
- Pregnancy or desire to be pregnant during the study,
- Patient not affiliated to a French or European healthcare insurance,
- Patient under supervision or guardianship
- Patient who is unable to give consent,
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Robot-assisted surgical strategyPrimary or revision bariatric surgery (for complications or side effects of a previous surgery), using a robotic approach. The robot used will be the Da Vinci X or Xi model (depending on the center) from the company Intuitive Surgical. | Procedure or surgery | Robot-assisted surgical strategy |
| Conventional laparoscopic surgical strategyPrimary or revision bariatric surgery (for complications or side effects of a previous surgery), using a conventional laparoscopic approach | Procedure or surgery | Conventional laparoscopic surgical strategy |
| Visual analog scaleAll patients will have pain evaluation with visual analog scale | Other | Conventional laparoscopic surgical strategy, Robot-assisted surgical strategy |
| EQ-5D-5L questionnaireAll patients will have quality of life assessment with EQ-5D-5L questionnaire | Other | Conventional laparoscopic surgical strategy, Robot-assisted surgical strategy |
| Impact of Weight on Quality of Life (IWQOL) questionnaireAll patients will have Quality of life assessment with IWQOL questionnaire | Other | Conventional laparoscopic surgical strategy, Robot-assisted surgical strategy |
Primary outcome
Incremental cost-effectivEness ratio (ICER)
Time frame: 1 year after surgery
Ratio expressed as additional cost per Quality Adjusted Life Year gained (cost/QALY) calculated from: * Survival and quality of life data (EQ-5D-5L questionnaire) * Cost data (micro-costing) and by individual matching with the French National Health Insurance Information System (SNDS database)
20 secondary outcomes
Number, type and severity of intraoperative complications
Time frame: End of the surgery
Number, type and severity of postoperative complications
Time frame: 1, 3 and 12 months after surgery
Pain assessment
Time frame: 1 day, 2 days and 1 month after surgery
Readmission rate
Time frame: 1, 3 and 12 months after surgery
Reintervention rate
Time frame: 1, 3 and 12 months after surgery
Quality of life assessment with EQ-5D-5L questionnaire
Time frame: Before surgery and at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery
Quality of life assessment with IWQOL questionnaire
Time frame: Before surgery and at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery
Duration of surgery
Time frame: End of the surgery
Length of hospital stay
Time frame: at hospital discharge, an average of 3 days +- 2 days
Readmission rate in High Dependency unit and/or intensive care unit
Time frame: Within 12 months after surgery
Cost of the initial hospital stay
Time frame: at hospital discharge, an average of 3 days +- 2 days
ICER in subgroup of patients with preoperative BMI < 50 versus patients with preoperative BMI > 50 kg/m2
Time frame: 12 months after surgery
ICER in subgroup of patients age > 60 years old versus patients age < 60 years
Time frame: 12 months after surgery
ICER in subgroup of patients with primary surgery versus patients with revisional surgery
Time frame: 12 months after surgery
ICER in subgroup of patients with restrictive surgery versus patients with malabsorptive surgery
Time frame: 12 months after surgery
ICER depending on preoperative risk
Time frame: 12 months after surgery
Perform a budgeT impact analysis
Time frame: 5-year modelling
Weight loss
Time frame: 6 and 12 months after surgery
Changes in treatment
Time frame: 6 and 12 months after surgery
Presence of sleep apnoea syndrome
Time frame: 6 and 12 months after surgery
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 Jul 2026.
Related trials for Obesity
RecruitingObservational study
Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG) Prospective Trial for Obesity (EGO-Trial)
Obesity
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Effects of Sequential Therapy With Mexidol® (Intravenous) and Mexidol® FORTE 250 (Oral) on Functional Brain Activity Assessed by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Biochemical Parameters in Patients With Chronic Cerebral Ischemia: A Comparison of Patients With and Without Metabolic Disorders
Metabolic Abnormalities, Obesity & Overweight
Recruiting
Exercise Training and Vitamin D Metabolism
Obesity & Overweight, Vitamin D
Recruiting
Metabolic Health, Bones and Nuts During Weight Loss in Adults
Weight Loss, Bone Density
Active, not recruiting
Effect of Probiotics on Insulin Sensitivity in Overweight and Obese Pregnancy
Obesity & Overweight, Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
18 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Robot-assisted surgical strategy, Conventional laparoscopic surgical strategy and Visual analog scale in people with Obesity, run by Hospices Civils de Lyon at 18 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 18 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Maud ROBERT, MD, PHD (+33 4 72 11 62 63, maud.robert@chu-lyon.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Incremental cost-effectivEness ratio (ICER) (time frame: 1 year after surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Jul 2026.