Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) PatientsNCT06871124
Early Neuromodulation in Traumatic Brain Injury
A study testing transcranial electrical stimulation in people with Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) Patients, run by University of Cincinnati at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The two goals of the proposed study are: (1) To determine how brain activity changes with cognitive recovery over time from acute to chronic phases of traumatic brain injury (TBI). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) Patients
- What is being tested?
- transcranial electrical stimulation
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 16 Jun 2025to 30 Apr 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Moderate to severe TBI: Glasgow Coma Scale (GSC) in the 3-12 range and greater than 30 min of loss of consciousness and/or a post-traumatic amnesia that lasts more than 24 hours and/or an alteration of mental state over 24 hours,
- age 18-80 years,
- Isolated TBI,
- Intelligible speech and Galveston Orientation and Amnesia Test (GOAT) score >70 at time of enrollment.
Who cannot join
- Persistent bilateral non-reactive pupils or other evidence of non-survivable injury,
- Decompressive craniectomy to treat refractory ICP subsequent to diffuse injury, (3) Co-enrollment in another therapeutic TBI trial,
- Pregnancy, (5) Patients with polytrauma (6) Patients with clinical seizures or status epilepticus.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
University of Cincinnati
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219
Ishita Basu, 2178199493, basuia@ucmail.uc.edu
About this study
Official title: Early Neuromodulation for Cognitive Recovery and Rehabilitation in Traumatic Brain Injury
The two goals of the proposed study are: (1) To determine how brain activity changes with cognitive recovery over time from acute to chronic phases of traumatic brain injury (TBI). (2) To determine how the time of anodal transcranial electrical stimulation (A-tES) administration affects cognitive performance and brain activity in TBI.
To achieve these study goals, the investigators will conduct a pilot clinical trial over three years in which the investigators aim to recruit 60 patients with moderate to severe TBI at the University of Cincinnati Medical Center (UCMC). During the acute phase of TBI, all participants will complete clinical questionnaires and perform 2 cognitive computer tasks while their brain activity is recorded. Half of the participants will be randomly selected to receive A-tES for 15 minutes while performing cognitive tasks and the other half will receive sham stimulation. All participants will be followed for 6 months. During their 3-month follow-up, the investigators will perform another session where all participants complete the questionnaires and receive A-tES while performing cognitive tasks during brain recording. In their last visit at 6 months post-injury, all participants will complete the questionnaires and cognitive tasks with brain recording but no stimulation treatment. From the collected data, the investigators will determine if time from brain injury correlates with brain activity during performance of cognitive tasks. The investigators will also assess the efficacy of early A-tES treatment for improving cognitive task performance and clinical test ratings at 6 months post-injury in comparison to A-tES delivered during the 3-month follow-up visit.
Read the detailed description
Background: Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) is a medical and surgical epidemic affecting at least 1.7 million individuals yearly in the United States. Functional outcomes after TBI can show improvement or deterioration up to two decades after injury, and rates of all-cause mortality remain elevated for many years. Cognitive impairments are among the most disabling of post-TBI symptoms and typically contribute more to persisting disability than physical impairment. Following TBI, deficits are consistently demonstrated in the domains of attention, working memory and executive functioning. To date, there are some potential interventions for motor/functional recovery but there is no treatment for cognitive dysfunction which is more disabling. Although brain stimulation techniques appear promising as treatments to improve neuropsychiatric conditions and functional deficits, most noninvasive brain stimu¬lation interventions have been nontargeted and focused on the chronic phase of recovery after TBI. In the acute stages, there is limited available evidence of the efficacy and safety of brain stimulation to improve outcomes. The stimulation during chronic phase is applied either in isolation or before cognitive training. TBI thus underscores a major unaddressed challenge: the lack of time sensitive cognitive rehabilitation therapy post injury. Thus, there is an urgent need to develop rehabilitation paradigms in the early phases of injury for cognitive recovery and prevention of long-term cognitive impairments.
Hypothesis/Objective(s): This study is based on the hypothesis that early intervention with anodal transcranial electrical stimulation (A-tES) during the acute and sub-acute phases of TBI will enhance cognitive recovery over a similar intervention used only in the sub-acute phase. The objective of this study is to determine neural biomarkers of cognitive functional recovery in TBI and to investigate the neuromodulatory effects of early A-tES on cognitive functions in the sub-acute/chronic phases of TBI.
Specific Aims: (1) To determine neural correlates of cognitive recovery from injury over the acute to sub-acute/chronic phase in TBI, (2) To determine effects of time from injury when A-tES was administered on cognitive performance and associated EEG rhythms in TBI.
Study Design: The investigators will conduct a pilot clinical trial over a 3-year period in which we aim to recruit 60 patients with moderate to severe isolated TBI at the University of Cincinnati Medical Center (UCMC). All recruited participants will be administered a Brief test of adult cognition (BTACT) at bedside during the acute phase. They will perform 2 cognitive tasks on a laptop computer while their EEGs are being recorded. 50% of recruited patients selected randomly during the acute phase will receive active A-tES to their left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) for 15 minutes each during the performance of cognitive tasks while the rest will receive sham stimulation. All participants will be followed for 6 months. When they return for their typical 3-month follow-up, we will perform another session with BTACT, EEG and cognitive tasks. During this visit all participants will receive active A-tES to their left dlPFC while performing cognitive tasks. In their last visit at 6 months post injury, all participants will be administered BTACT and cognitive tasks with EEG recordings but no intervention. They will also complete a quality of life (QOL) questionnaire designed through involvement of CBPR during their follow-up visits. For Aim 1, the investigators will determine if there are significant temporal correlations between neural oscillations recorded via EEG during the performance of cognitive tasks and injury phase. For Aim 2, the investigators will use a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled, parallel study design to assess effects of early A-tES on improving performance on computer tasks, clinical test ratings and QOL measures during the 6-month post injury follow-up compared to A-tES delivered during the 3-month follow up visit.
- Conditions
- Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) Patients
- Being tested
- transcranial electrical stimulation, Sham Comparator
- Keywords
- transcranial electrical stimulation, cognitive control, working memory, EEG
- Medical subject headings
- Brain Injuries, Traumatic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
transcranial electrical stimulationDevice
Anodal transcranial electrical stimulation (A-tES) is a widely used and well tolerated non-invasive electrical stimulation paradigm that promotes adaptive neuroplasticity and may prevent or reduce pathological sequela following brain injury. It has been used in a wide variety of neurologic and psychiatric disorders for cognitive and motor rehabilitation.
Sham ComparatorDevice
Sham comparator consist of A-tES in the beginning and end of stimulation block but no stimulation during the actual stimulation period.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Early intervention | Experimental | Patients assigned to this arm will receive anodal transcranial electrical stimulation (A-tES) within a 1-2 weeks of their injury and another session of tES at a 3 month follow up visit. Receives: Device: transcranial electrical stimulation |
| Sham | Sham comparator | Patients assigned to this arm will receive sham transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) within a 1-2 weeks of their injury and another session of tES at a 3 month follow up visit. Receives: Device: Sham Comparator |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Cognitive Task Behavior
Response time and accuracy on multi source interference task and 1-back working memory task.
Measured: from enrollment to 6 months after brain injury
Task evoked EEG oscillatory power
Task evoked theta and alpha band power
Measured: from enrollment to end of 6 month visit
Secondary outcomes (2)
Brief Test of Adult Cognition by Telephone (BTACT)
The Brief Test of Adult Cognition by Telephone (BTACT) assesses multiple dimensions central for effective functioning across adulthood: episodic memory, working memory, reasoning, verbal fluency, and executive function. The BTACT is the first instrument which includes measures of processing speed, reaction time, and task switching/inhibitory control for use over the telephone.
Measured: from enrollment to 6 months after brain injury
Quality of Life (QOL)
We will formulate a QOL by partnering with a community advisory board comprising of TBI survivors and their caregiver/family members.
Measured: from enrollment to 6 months after brain injury
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Mar 2025
- Study start16 Jun 2025
- Primary completion30 Nov 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Apr 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) PatientsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of CincinnatiThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Cincinnati
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ishita Basu, University of Cincinnati
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06871124
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- TP230311
- Other IDs
- TP230311
- Status last verified
- Jun 2026
- First submitted
- 27 Feb 2025
- Last updated
- 3 Jun 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Jun 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Early Neuromodulation for Cognitive Recovery and Rehabilitation in Traumatic Brain Injury
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06871124
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TP230311
- Conditions
- Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) Patients
- Keywords
- transcranial electrical stimulation, cognitive control, working memory, EEG
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of CincinnatiUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 16 Jun 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Nov 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Apr 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 11 Mar 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The two goals of the proposed study are: (1) To determine how brain activity changes with cognitive recovery over time from acute to chronic phases of traumatic brain injury (TBI). (2) To determine how the time of anodal transcranial electrical stimulation (A-tES) administration affects cognitive performance and brain activity in TBI.
To achieve these study goals, the investigators will conduct a pilot clinical trial over three years in which the investigators aim to recruit 60 patients with moderate to severe TBI at the University of Cincinnati Medical Center (UCMC). During the acute phase of TBI, all participants will complete clinical questionnaires and perform 2 cognitive computer tasks while their brain activity is recorded. Half of the participants will be randomly selected to receive A-tES for 15 minutes while performing cognitive tasks and the other half will receive sham stimulation. All participants will be followed for 6 months. During their 3-month follow-up, the investigators will perform another session where all participants complete the questionnaires and receive A-tES while performing cognitive tasks during brain recording. In their last visit at 6 months post-injury, all participants will complete the questionnaires and cognitive tasks with brain recording but no stimulation treatment. From the collected data, the investigators will determine if time from brain injury correlates with brain activity during performance of cognitive tasks. The investigators will also assess the efficacy of early A-tES treatment for improving cognitive task performance and clinical test ratings at 6 months post-injury in comparison to A-tES delivered during the 3-month follow-up visit.
Detailed description
Background: Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) is a medical and surgical epidemic affecting at least 1.7 million individuals yearly in the United States. Functional outcomes after TBI can show improvement or deterioration up to two decades after injury, and rates of all-cause mortality remain elevated for many years. Cognitive impairments are among the most disabling of post-TBI symptoms and typically contribute more to persisting disability than physical impairment. Following TBI, deficits are consistently demonstrated in the domains of attention, working memory and executive functioning. To date, there are some potential interventions for motor/functional recovery but there is no treatment for cognitive dysfunction which is more disabling. Although brain stimulation techniques appear promising as treatments to improve neuropsychiatric conditions and functional deficits, most noninvasive brain stimu¬lation interventions have been nontargeted and focused on the chronic phase of recovery after TBI. In the acute stages, there is limited available evidence of the efficacy and safety of brain stimulation to improve outcomes. The stimulation during chronic phase is applied either in isolation or before cognitive training. TBI thus underscores a major unaddressed challenge: the lack of time sensitive cognitive rehabilitation therapy post injury. Thus, there is an urgent need to develop rehabilitation paradigms in the early phases of injury for cognitive recovery and prevention of long-term cognitive impairments.
Hypothesis/Objective(s): This study is based on the hypothesis that early intervention with anodal transcranial electrical stimulation (A-tES) during the acute and sub-acute phases of TBI will enhance cognitive recovery over a similar intervention used only in the sub-acute phase. The objective of this study is to determine neural biomarkers of cognitive functional recovery in TBI and to investigate the neuromodulatory effects of early A-tES on cognitive functions in the sub-acute/chronic phases of TBI.
Specific Aims: (1) To determine neural correlates of cognitive recovery from injury over the acute to sub-acute/chronic phase in TBI, (2) To determine effects of time from injury when A-tES was administered on cognitive performance and associated EEG rhythms in TBI.
Study Design: The investigators will conduct a pilot clinical trial over a 3-year period in which we aim to recruit 60 patients with moderate to severe isolated TBI at the University of Cincinnati Medical Center (UCMC). All recruited participants will be administered a Brief test of adult cognition (BTACT) at bedside during the acute phase. They will perform 2 cognitive tasks on a laptop computer while their EEGs are being recorded. 50% of recruited patients selected randomly during the acute phase will receive active A-tES to their left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) for 15 minutes each during the performance of cognitive tasks while the rest will receive sham stimulation. All participants will be followed for 6 months. When they return for their typical 3-month follow-up, we will perform another session with BTACT, EEG and cognitive tasks. During this visit all participants will receive active A-tES to their left dlPFC while performing cognitive tasks. In their last visit at 6 months post injury, all participants will be administered BTACT and cognitive tasks with EEG recordings but no intervention. They will also complete a quality of life (QOL) questionnaire designed through involvement of CBPR during their follow-up visits. For Aim 1, the investigators will determine if there are significant temporal correlations between neural oscillations recorded via EEG during the performance of cognitive tasks and injury phase. For Aim 2, the investigators will use a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled, parallel study design to assess effects of early A-tES on improving performance on computer tasks, clinical test ratings and QOL measures during the 6-month post injury follow-up compared to A-tES delivered during the 3-month follow up visit.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Early intervention | Experimental | Device: transcranial electrical stimulationPatients assigned to this arm will receive anodal transcranial electrical stimulation (A-tES) within a 1-2 weeks of their injury and another session of tES at a 3 month follow up visit. |
| Sham | Sham comparator | Device: Sham ComparatorPatients assigned to this arm will receive sham transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) within a 1-2 weeks of their injury and another session of tES at a 3 month follow up visit. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Moderate to severe TBI: Glasgow Coma Scale (GSC) in the 3-12 range and greater than 30 min of loss of consciousness and/or a post-traumatic amnesia that lasts more than 24 hours and/or an alteration of mental state over 24 hours,
- age 18-80 years,
- Isolated TBI,
- Intelligible speech and Galveston Orientation and Amnesia Test (GOAT) score >70 at time of enrollment.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Persistent bilateral non-reactive pupils or other evidence of non-survivable injury,
- Decompressive craniectomy to treat refractory ICP subsequent to diffuse injury, (3) Co-enrollment in another therapeutic TBI trial,
- Pregnancy, (5) Patients with polytrauma (6) Patients with clinical seizures or status epilepticus.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| transcranial electrical stimulationAnodal transcranial electrical stimulation (A-tES) is a widely used and well tolerated non-invasive electrical stimulation paradigm that promotes adaptive neuroplasticity and may prevent or reduce pathological sequela following brain injury. It has been used in a wide variety of neurologic and psychiatric disorders for cognitive and motor rehabilitation. | Device | Early intervention |
| Sham ComparatorSham comparator consist of A-tES in the beginning and end of stimulation block but no stimulation during the actual stimulation period. | Device | Sham |
Primary outcome
Cognitive Task Behavior
Time frame: from enrollment to 6 months after brain injury
Response time and accuracy on multi source interference task and 1-back working memory task.
Task evoked EEG oscillatory power
Time frame: from enrollment to end of 6 month visit
Task evoked theta and alpha band power
2 secondary outcomes
Brief Test of Adult Cognition by Telephone (BTACT)
Time frame: from enrollment to 6 months after brain injury
Quality of Life (QOL)
Time frame: from enrollment to 6 months after brain injury
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Jun 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) Patients
Enrolling by invitation
Improving In-hospital and Post-discharge Patient Education for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Concussion, Mild, Traumatic Brain Injury
RecruitingPhase 4
Early Post-Traumatic Seizures Prevention Trial (E-PTS Trial)
Seizures, Traumatic Brain Injuries
RecruitingPhase 3
Efficacy of Propranolol in Traumatic Brain Injury Patients Admitted to the ICU: A Prospective, Randomized, Triple-Blind Study
Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) Patients
RecruitingPhase 1
Rehabilitation Through Virtual Immersion & Integrated Exposure for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury (ReVIVE for mTBI)
Traumatic Brain Injuries, TBI (Traumatic Brain Injury)
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Prospective Observational Multimodal Neuromonitoring in Adult NSICU Patients
Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, Aneurysmal, Brain Injuries, Traumatic
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing transcranial electrical stimulation in people with Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) Patients, run by University of Cincinnati at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Ishita Basu, PhD (5135583991, basuia@ucmail.uc.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Cognitive Task Behavior (time frame: from enrollment to 6 months after brain injury). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Jun 2026.