Nurse-Patient RelationsNCT06878820
Nurses in the Lead - Nursing Leadership and Autonomy in Function Focused Care in Hospital
An observational study of Nurse-Patient Relations and Implementation Research, run by Leiden University Medical Center at 3 sites in Netherlands.
Trial summary
The goal of this prospective before-after study (observational) is to implement Function Focused Care in Hospital (FFCiH), paying specific attention to the role of nurses and how they can take the leadership and autonomy in the interprofessional collaboration regarding FFCiH. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Nurse-Patient Relations, Implementation Research, Physical Inactivity
- What is being tested?
- Function Focused Care
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- How many people
- 425 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesNetherlands
- Study dates
- 18 Nov 2024to 30 Oct 2025
- How long will I take part?
- 10 Days
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: The domain of this study consists of * nurses, physiotherapists, doctors, other member of the interprofessional team (e.g. occupational therapist), * patients admitted to a surgical respectively internal medicine ward of a hospital, and their informal caregivers.
Who may be able to join
- All (student-)nurses working in the participating wards are expected to be involved in application of FFC and role development with regards to leadership and autonomy of nurses and therefore considered to be eligible for participation in the study.
- All professional groups that are part of the interprofessional team of the ward and who work in the participating wards are expected to collaborate with the nursing in their daily care and therefore considered to be eligible for participation in this study.
- All patients admitted to the participating wards of the 2 hospitals receiving care either before or after the implementation of FFC and the patients informal caregiver as determined by the patient.
Who cannot join
- No exclusion criteria were defined for nurses and student nurses.
- Physiotherapists, doctors and other member of the interprofessional team;
- No exclusion criteria were defined for physiotherapists, doctors and other members of the interprofessional team.
- Patients and informal caregivers:
- A life-threatening situation or in a terminal phase upon admission (only applicable to patients)
- Not mastering the Dutch language;
Show all 9Show fewer
- Not able to communicate adequately, based on a below threshold score on the MOCA or the FAST (only applicable to patients)
- A second hospitalization on one of the participating wards after being included in the study during the study period;
- An hospitalization < 48 hours
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country.
Netherlands3 sites
Stichting Slingeland Ziekenhuis
Doetinchem, 3584 CS
Leiden University Medical Center
Leiden
Erasmus MC
Rotterdam
About this study
Official title: Nurses in the Lead - Nursing Leadership and Autonomy in Function Focused Care in Hospital: a Prospective Before-after Study
The goal of this prospective before-after study (observational) is to implement Function Focused Care in Hospital (FFCiH), paying specific attention to the role of nurses and how they can take the leadership and autonomy in the interprofessional collaboration regarding FFCiH. To reach this aim, the researchers defined two sub-objectives:
- to identify barriers and facilitators (determinants) for nursing autonomy and leadership and application FFCiH in the interprofessional collaboration on a surgical and internal medicine ward to design a tailored implementation strategy for FFCiH. 2. to evaluate the effectiveness of the implementation strategy on nursing leadership and the application of FFCiH.
Read more
The investigators developed two work packages related to the two sub-objectives: identifying determinants and strategies for the successful application of FFCiH and nurse leadership, among others, by introducing nurse champions and evaluating their effect on the application of FFCiH. The primary endpoint is the level of application of FFCiH as reflected in adherence to and coverage of FFCiH in daily nursing care.
The secondary endpoints are: 1) for nurses: the nurses' role development with regards to leadership and autonomy in the application of FFCiH by ward nurses and nurse champions, leadership competencies of ward nurses, and autonomy of ward nurses and 2) for patients: physical functioning and independency in mobility and ADL.
Researchers will compare FFCiH with usual care to see if there are differences regarding the outcome measurements.
The study population consists of nurses, physiotherapists, doctors, other member of the interprofessional team, hospitalized patients and their relatives.
Intervention: FFCiH focuses on stimulating nurses to promote patients' self-reliance in daily functioning, encouraging the patients' engagement in daily activities and, helping patients to attain and maintain their highest level of function and increasing time spent in physical activity. FFCiH is a proven effective approach for promoting patients' physical functioning and mobility.
Read the detailed description
The investigators will conduct a prospective before-after multicenter study, including a process evaluation, with a mixed methods approach in two university medical centers. In the preparation phase before the before-after study the tailored implementation strategy for FFCiH will be developed. Between the before and after phases of the study, the investigators will implement in two or three cyclic processes the FFCiH approach by strengthening nursing leadership and autonomy in the application of FFCiH in the interprofessional collaboration, using the predefined tailored implementation strategy.
- Conditions
- Nurse-Patient Relations, Implementation Research, Physical Inactivity, Physical Activities, ADL, Mobility and Independence
- Being tested
- Function Focused Care
- Keywords
- function focused care, implementation, leadership, mobility, ADL, nurses in the lead, nursing care
- Medical subject headings
- Sedentary Behavior, Motor Activity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Function Focused CareBehavioural
Also called FFC, FFCiH, Function Focused Care in Hospital
FFCiH is an effective nursing approach and focuses on stimulating nurses to promote patients' self-reliance in daily functioning, encouraging the patients' engagement in daily activities and helping patients to attain and maintain their highest level of function and to increase time spent in physical activity.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Function Focused Care | Nurses provide care according to Function Focused Care in Hospital (FFCiH) principles. After implementation of this intervention, all patients admitted to the selected wards in the hospital receive FFCiH. Receives: Behavioral: Function Focused Care | |
| Usual Care | Before implementation of Function Focused Care in Hospital, nurses provide care as usual to patients admitted to the selected wards in hospital |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Level of leadership using the Leadership Practices Inventory (LPI) - Nurses
The LPI questionnaire consist of 30 leadership behaviors presented as behavioral statements, that can categorized into 5 subscales, representing five leadership practices: 1) Model the way, 2) Inspire a shared vision, 3) Challenge the process, 4) Enable others to act, and 5) Encourage the heart. Each of these statement can be scored on a 10-point Likert scale, for which a higher score indicate more frequent the respondent engage in the leadership behavior. The internal reliability of the LPI in nurses ranges from 0.66 to 0.96.36 The original questionnaire has been translated into Dutch.
Measured: up to four weeks directly before implementation & up to four weeks directly after implementation
Level of autonomy - Nurses
Using the Maastricht Autonomy Questionnaire (MAQ), which consists of 10 items scored on a five-point Likert scale ranging from very little to very much.The total score ranges from 10 to 50. Higher scores indicate more job autonomy. The questionnaire includes information on job control and freedom in work tasks and methods. It measures the opportunity for staff to determine a variety of task elements, such as the pace of work and the work goals. A sample item is: 'My work offers me the opportunity to interrupt my job whenever I want.' Current study findings confirmed good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha=0.90).
Measured: up to four weeks directly before implementation & up to four weeks directly after implementation
Secondary outcomes (5)
Adherence (fidelity)
Refers to the extent to which FFCiH has been applied as intended, and will be measured with the key components of FFCiH, such as goal setting with patient, individualized care plan, encouragement of patient's active involvement in ADL and evaluation the level of the patient's ADL-independence and mobility.
This outcome will be measured with
- qualitative focus group interviews with the multidisciplinary team and individual interviews with patients. Topics include the key components of FFCiH.
- Screening of electronic patient records. The electronic patient records will be screened on the number of reported short- and long-term goals and the amount of nursing report that contains information about bathing, dressing, mobility or transfers.
Measured: up to four weeks after implementation
Level of mobility - Patients
Measured using the AMEXO. this measure is the Amsterdam UMC extension of the John Hopkins Highest Level of Mobility (AMEXO) scale. The instrument consist of twelve categories representing the highest level of mobility. The response categories includes: 1= bed lying; 2= bed turn self/activity; 3= bed sit at edge; 4= chair transfer; 5= stand 1 minute; 6=walk 10+ steps; 7=walk 25+ feet; 8=walk 250+ feet ,9= 225m; 10= 450m; 11= 750m; 12= 1125m.:.'. The higher the total score, the higher the level of independence.
Measured: <72 hours after hospital admission and at discharge (assessed up to 3 days)
Level of independence in Activities of Daily Livings - patients
Measured with the KATZ-ADL. This measurement consists of 6 items: bathing, dressing, toilet visit, movement inside the house, continence, feeding. The items score on a 2 point scale: dependent or independent.
Measured: <72 hours after hospital admission and at discharge (assessed up to 3 days)
Level of coverage (reach)
Refers to the extent to which patients actually receive FFCiH, and measured by determining the extent to which patients who qualify for FFCiH actually receive it.
This outcome will be measured with 1) qualitative focus group interviews with the multidisciplinary team and individual interviews with patients. Topics include the key components of FFCiH. 2) Screening of electronic patient records. The electronic patient records will be screened on the number of reported short- and long-term goals and the amount of nursing report that contains information about bathing, dressing, mobility or transfers.
Measured: up to four weeks after implementation
Numbers of days stayed in the hospital - patients
Based on the findings in our previous study and known from clinical practice, we know that discharge from hospital highly depends on independence in ADL and/or mobility. As a result, it is expected that a recovery of independence in ADL and mobility primarily does not lead to higher levels of independence in ADL and mobility at discharge, but to a shorter admission with the same level of independence in ADL and mobility. Therefore, we also will collect data from patient files regarding the duration of hospital admission.
Measured: At discharge (assessed up to 14 days)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Mar 2025
- Study start18 Nov 2024
- Primary completion11 Oct 2025
- Study completion30 Oct 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Nurse-Patient RelationsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 425 participants (actual)
- Target duration
- 10 Days
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Leiden University Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Erasmus Medical Center, Slingeland Hospital
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, jmman, Leiden University Medical Center
- Investigators
- Janneke M de Man - van Ginkel, Principal investigator, Leiden University Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06878820
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 134718
- Other IDs
- 10040022230013
- Status last verified
- Aug 2026
- First submitted
- 22 Nov 2024
- Last updated
- 28 Aug 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Kok S, Schoonhoven L, Vernooij LM, Reitsma JB, Verstraten C, Metzelthin SF, Bleijenberg N, de Man-van Ginkel JM. The effectiveness of Function Focused Care among patients acutely admitted to hospital: A stepped wedge cluster trial. Int J Nurs Stud. 2024 Dec;160:104893. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104893. Epub 2024 Sep 4.
PubMed 39321557Kok S, de Man-van Ginkel JM, Verstraten C, Resnick B, Metzelthin SF, Bleijenberg N, Schoonhoven L. Function focused care in hospital: A mixed-method feasibility study. Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2021 Sep 29;3:100045. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2021.100045. eCollection 2021 Nov.
PubMed 38746732
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Aug 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Nurses in the Lead - Nursing Leadership and Autonomy in Function Focused Care in Hospital: a Prospective Before-after Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06878820
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 134718
- Conditions
- Nurse-Patient Relations, Implementation Research, Physical Inactivity, Physical Activities, ADL, Mobility and Independence
- Keywords
- function focused care, implementation, leadership, mobility, ADL, nurses in the lead, nursing care
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 425 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Leiden University Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Erasmus Medical Center, Slingeland Hospital
- Study start
- 18 Nov 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 11 Oct 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Oct 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Mar 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this prospective before-after study (observational) is to implement Function Focused Care in Hospital (FFCiH), paying specific attention to the role of nurses and how they can take the leadership and autonomy in the interprofessional collaboration regarding FFCiH. To reach this aim, the researchers defined two sub-objectives:
- to identify barriers and facilitators (determinants) for nursing autonomy and leadership and application FFCiH in the interprofessional collaboration on a surgical and internal medicine ward to design a tailored implementation strategy for FFCiH. 2. to evaluate the effectiveness of the implementation strategy on nursing leadership and the application of FFCiH.
The investigators developed two work packages related to the two sub-objectives: identifying determinants and strategies for the successful application of FFCiH and nurse leadership, among others, by introducing nurse champions and evaluating their effect on the application of FFCiH. The primary endpoint is the level of application of FFCiH as reflected in adherence to and coverage of FFCiH in daily nursing care.
The secondary endpoints are: 1) for nurses: the nurses' role development with regards to leadership and autonomy in the application of FFCiH by ward nurses and nurse champions, leadership competencies of ward nurses, and autonomy of ward nurses and 2) for patients: physical functioning and independency in mobility and ADL.
Researchers will compare FFCiH with usual care to see if there are differences regarding the outcome measurements.
The study population consists of nurses, physiotherapists, doctors, other member of the interprofessional team, hospitalized patients and their relatives.
Intervention: FFCiH focuses on stimulating nurses to promote patients' self-reliance in daily functioning, encouraging the patients' engagement in daily activities and, helping patients to attain and maintain their highest level of function and increasing time spent in physical activity. FFCiH is a proven effective approach for promoting patients' physical functioning and mobility.
Detailed description
The investigators will conduct a prospective before-after multicenter study, including a process evaluation, with a mixed methods approach in two university medical centers. In the preparation phase before the before-after study the tailored implementation strategy for FFCiH will be developed. Between the before and after phases of the study, the investigators will implement in two or three cyclic processes the FFCiH approach by strengthening nursing leadership and autonomy in the application of FFCiH in the interprofessional collaboration, using the predefined tailored implementation strategy.
Study design
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Target follow-up
- 10 Days
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Function Focused Care | – | Behavioral: Function Focused CareNurses provide care according to Function Focused Care in Hospital (FFCiH) principles. After implementation of this intervention, all patients admitted to the selected wards in the hospital receive FFCiH. |
| Usual Care | – | –Before implementation of Function Focused Care in Hospital, nurses provide care as usual to patients admitted to the selected wards in hospital |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- The domain of this study consists of * nurses, physiotherapists, doctors, other member of the interprofessional team (e.g. occupational therapist), * patients admitted to a surgical respectively internal medicine ward of a hospital, and their informal caregivers.
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- All (student-)nurses working in the participating wards are expected to be involved in application of FFC and role development with regards to leadership and autonomy of nurses and therefore considered to be eligible for participation in the study.
- All professional groups that are part of the interprofessional team of the ward and who work in the participating wards are expected to collaborate with the nursing in their daily care and therefore considered to be eligible for participation in this study.
- All patients admitted to the participating wards of the 2 hospitals receiving care either before or after the implementation of FFC and the patients informal caregiver as determined by the patient.
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- No exclusion criteria were defined for nurses and student nurses.
- Physiotherapists, doctors and other member of the interprofessional team;
- No exclusion criteria were defined for physiotherapists, doctors and other members of the interprofessional team.
- A life-threatening situation or in a terminal phase upon admission (only applicable to patients)
- Not mastering the Dutch language;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Function Focused CareAlso: FFC, FFCiH, Function Focused Care in HospitalFFCiH is an effective nursing approach and focuses on stimulating nurses to promote patients' self-reliance in daily functioning, encouraging the patients' engagement in daily activities and helping patients to attain and maintain their highest level of function and to increase time spent in physical activity. | Behavioural | Function Focused Care |
Primary outcome
Level of leadership using the Leadership Practices Inventory (LPI) - Nurses
Time frame: up to four weeks directly before implementation & up to four weeks directly after implementation
The LPI questionnaire consist of 30 leadership behaviors presented as behavioral statements, that can categorized into 5 subscales, representing five leadership practices: 1) Model the way, 2) Inspire a shared vision, 3) Challenge the process, 4) Enable others to act, and 5) Encourage the heart. Each of these statement can be scored on a 10-point Likert scale, for which a higher score indicate more frequent the respondent engage in the leadership behavior. The internal reliability of the LPI in nurses ranges from 0.66 to 0.96.36 The original questionnaire has been translated into Dutch.
Level of autonomy - Nurses
Time frame: up to four weeks directly before implementation & up to four weeks directly after implementation
Using the Maastricht Autonomy Questionnaire (MAQ), which consists of 10 items scored on a five-point Likert scale ranging from very little to very much.The total score ranges from 10 to 50. Higher scores indicate more job autonomy. The questionnaire includes information on job control and freedom in work tasks and methods. It measures the opportunity for staff to determine a variety of task elements, such as the pace of work and the work goals. A sample item is: 'My work offers me the opportunity to interrupt my job whenever I want.' Current study findings confirmed good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha=0.90).
5 secondary outcomes
Adherence (fidelity)
Time frame: up to four weeks after implementation
Level of mobility - Patients
Time frame: <72 hours after hospital admission and at discharge (assessed up to 3 days)
Level of independence in Activities of Daily Livings - patients
Time frame: <72 hours after hospital admission and at discharge (assessed up to 3 days)
Level of coverage (reach)
Time frame: up to four weeks after implementation
Numbers of days stayed in the hospital - patients
Time frame: At discharge (assessed up to 14 days)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Aug 2026.
- Background: PubMed 39321557Kok S, Schoonhoven L, Vernooij LM, Reitsma JB, Verstraten C, Metzelthin SF, Bleijenberg N, de Man-van Ginkel JM. The effectiveness of Function Focused Care among patients acutely admitted to hospital: A stepped wedge cluster trial. Int J Nurs Stud. 2024 Dec;160:104893. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104893. Epub 2024 Sep 4.
- Background: PubMed 38746732Kok S, de Man-van Ginkel JM, Verstraten C, Resnick B, Metzelthin SF, Bleijenberg N, Schoonhoven L. Function focused care in hospital: A mixed-method feasibility study. Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2021 Sep 29;3:100045. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2021.100045. eCollection 2021 Nov.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Nurse-Patient Relations
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Surgical Nurses' Pain Management Self-Efficacy and Patients' Postoperative Pain Outcomes
Postoperative Pain
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Meaning-Centered Psychotherapy at Home
Nurse-Patient Relations, Psychology, Social
Not yet recruiting
Reducing Physical Workload Among Assistant Nurses Through Ergonomic Work Technique Training With or Without Biofeedback
Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders
Not yet recruiting
Impact of an Emergency Advanced Practice Nurse on Complications After Home Discharge of Oxygen-Dependent Patients Managed in the Emergency Department: A Quantitative and Qualitative Study
Acute Respiratory Conditions Requiring Oxygen Therapy, Advanced Practice Nursing
Recruiting
Nurse-Led Dialysis Self-Management Program for Hemodialysis Distress
Hemodialysis, Dialysis-Related Distress
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Janneke M de Man - van Ginkel principal investigator
Leiden University Medical Center
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Nurse-Patient Relations and Implementation Research, run by Leiden University Medical Center at 3 sites in Netherlands.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Level of leadership using the Leadership Practices Inventory (LPI) - Nurses (time frame: up to four weeks directly before implementation & up to four weeks directly after implementation). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06878820, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Aug 2026.