AzTrials
AzTrials

Ventilation Therapy; ComplicationsNeo-VPPNCT06882018

Educational Strategies for Maintaining Technical Skills in Neonatal Resuscitation for the Nursing Team

A study testing Repeated practice guided by peers and Instructor-guided deliberate practice in people with Ventilation Therapy; Complications and Technical Skills, run by Ahmed Moussa at 1 site in Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Despite efforts for initial training in neonatal resuscitation, health professionals show a decline in post-training skills, requiring continuing training. This randomized controlled pilot study will compare the feasibility and preliminary effects of two educational tools in the field, namely the traditional teaching… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Repeated practice guided by peers and Instructor-guided deliberate practice
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
42 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
1 Dec 2024to 30 Jun 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Registered or practical nurse working in neonatal intensive care at CHU Sainte-Justine
  • At least one year of experience in neonatology care at CHU Sainte-Justine
  • Completed the initial neonatal resuscitation training

Who cannot join

  • Neonatal transport nurses, due to their particular expertise which may introduce bias.
  • Nurse that are instructor for neonatal resuscitation training

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • CHU Sainte-Justine, Dept Neonatology

    Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1C5

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: Educational Strategies for Maintaining Technical Skills in Neonatal Resuscitation for the Nursing Team: A Pilot Project

Despite efforts for initial training in neonatal resuscitation, health professionals show a decline in post-training skills, requiring continuing training. This randomized controlled pilot study will compare the feasibility and preliminary effects of two educational tools in the field, namely the traditional teaching method (instructor-assisted deliberate practice) and an educational tool developed during the research project that involves repeated peer-guided practice. Both groups will perform the same educational activity using a mobile training station equipped with the equipment necessary for the PPV. Each session will be of 30 minutes and will be repeated three times over a period of three months.

Read the detailed description

Background :

Despite efforts for initial training in neonatal resuscitation (NR), health professionals show a decline in post-training skills, requiring continuing training. Lack of practice, financial resources and competent worker are the main challenges encountered on the department. However, optimal care in NR, particularly in positive pressure ventilation (PPV) saves lives. Deliberate practice (DP) is a simulation-based instructional strategy known for its effectiveness in maintaining skills. However, DP is limited by the resources and costs linked to the presence of experts. Self-directed, learner-centred approaches could solve these challenges.

This pilot study seeks to compare the proposed tool with a traditional method which is learning through PD guided by an instructor. This feasibility study will make it possible in the future to plan more in-depth research to promote the possibility of generalization.

Th specific research objectives are as follows.

  • The primary objective is to document the feasibility of implementing the proposed educational tool in order to maintain technical skills in VPP among practising nurses by comparing it to the traditional method. Feasibility measures include participant satisfaction with the quality of the teaching method, speed of participant recruitment, and participant participation and retention rate.
  • The secondary objective is to evaluate whether the participants' confidence in VPP, the propensity to change one's own practice as well as the performance of VPP in the experimental group is similar to the traditional group.

Methods

  • Design This randomized controlled pilot study will compare the feasibility and preliminary effects of two educational tools.
  • Sample and setting The research project will take place in the neonatal intensive care unit of the Sainte-Justine Hospital Centre (CHUSJ). The target population is the nursing team which includes approximately 240 people. The level of expertise of the sample aims to be as variable as the current population of the neonatal intensive care nursing team.

Convenience sampling due to its pragmatic approach. It allows to recruit accessible participants on time and with limited resources. A stratified randomization will be used to optimize the balance of the groups taking into account the two types of professionals (registered nurses and practical nurses).

The aim is to recruit 50 participants, in order to reach a sample of 40 participants in total considering a potential loss to follow-up of 15%.

Educational activities:

The content of the educational activity focuses on maintaining technical skills in positive pressure ventilation (PPV) during neonatal resuscitation and will be based on the contents of the chapter "Positive pressure ventilation" of the "Neonatal resuscitation manual, 8th edition". This activity consists of putting into practice the actions leading to the VPP sequence, as described in the road map, using the T-piece resuscitation machine (Neopuff) and the self-inflating bag, both of which are available in the clinic. It will take place on a mobile training station equipped with the necessary equipment for VPP. Each session will last 30 minutes and will be held during the participants' work shift, thus benefiting from protected time for training, and will be repeated three times over a three-month period.

The teaching strategy varies between the two groups of participants, which are:

  1. Intervention group: This approach involves repeated peer-guided practice. Each session will involve two participants, who will support each other using the feedback grid from the first section of the "Neonatal Mask Ventilation Competency Assessment Tool" developed to provide feedback on practising technical skills.
  2. Control group: In this group, practice is deliberate (PD) and is led by an instructor. Each session will be supervised by an instructor for two to four participants, and the latter will use the same feedback grid as that used in the intervention group to provide feedback.

Demographic and professional questionnaire:

Following consent to participate in the project, participants will have to complete this questionnaire including demographic data, including age by interval and gender, as well as professional data including work shift (day, evening, night, day and night rotation), initial training (college, university, other), the number of months of experience in neonatology, the approximate number of neonatal resuscitations and positive pressure ventilation in which they participated, the approximate number of simulations in neonatal intensive care in which they participated. These data will be used to describe the characteristics of the study sample.

Performance test (before and after training):

To assess changes in technical skills following the intervention, each participant will be assessed before and after the training.

The assessment will be carried out in the simulation room in the neonatal unit and will last 5 minutes. Upon arrival, the participant will be presented with a clinical vignette of a patient requiring positive pressure ventilation (see appendix). This vignette was created by the project researchers based on their experience in the field of neonatology. After two minutes of positive pressure ventilation, the patient will be stabilized and the vignette will end. A short feedback will be provided to the participant after the evaluation.

Two evaluators, including possibly the researcher himself, will complete the evaluation of each video recording, being blind to the participant's group as well as the phase of the study (pre or post training), using the tool "Neonatal Mask Ventilation Competency Assessment Tool". The effectiveness and relevance of this tool in the evaluation of essential clinical skills has been demonstrated, thus justifying its adoption for the project.

Final questionnaire:

This questionnaire will be completed by the participants at the end of their last practical session and is made up of a first part dedicated to the Continuing Professional Development (CPD) questionnaire and a second which assesses the degree of satisfaction, confidence and feasibility of the tool educational. This data will allow evaluation of th feasibility component, confidence as well as the propensity to change one's practice following th intervention.

Being tested
Repeated practice guided by peers, Instructor-guided deliberate practice

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Repeated practice guided by peersOther

    This approach involves repeated, peer-guided practice. Each session will involve two participants, who will support each other using the feedback grid from the first section of the "Neonatal Mask Ventilation Competency Assessment Tool" developed by DiLabio et al. (2018) to provide feedback on practicing technical skills.

  • Instructor-guided deliberate practiceOther

    In this group, practice is deliberate (PD) and is led by an instructor. Each session will be supervised by an instructor for two to four participants, and the latter will use the same feedback grid as that used in the intervention group to provide feedback.

Study groups in NCT06882018
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Repeated practice guided by peersExperimentalIntervention group which will use the educational tool during repeated practice guided by peers
Receives: Other: Repeated practice guided by peers
Instructor-guided deliberate practiceActive comparatorA control group that will use the traditional method, instructor-guided deliberate practice
Receives: Other: Instructor-guided deliberate practice

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Participant satisfaction with the quality of the educational methods assessed by a questionnaire

    The questionnaire uses a 1 to 4 likert scale with 1 being the highest satisfaction.

    Measured: 6 months

  2. Number of participants that agree to participate

    From 0 to 50, 50 being the better outcome

    Measured: 6 months

  3. Number of participants that terminate the study (retention rate).

    From 0 to 50, 50 being the better outcome

    Measured: 6 months

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Mean difference in performance of VPP as per the Neonatal Mask Ventilation Competency Assessment Tool (NMVCAT) score

    Scale from 0 to 100%, higher means better outcome (performance)

    Measured: 6 months

  2. Mean difference in confidence level of participants

    Likert scale 1 to 4 with 1 being the highest level of confidence

    Measured: 6 months

  3. Propensity to change behaviour score based on the CPD-REACTION questionnaire

    Rating from 1 to 7, 7 being the highest propensity to change behaviour

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Mar 2025
  2. Study start1 Dec 2024
  3. Primary completion1 Jun 2025
  4. Study completion30 Jun 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
42 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06882018
Sponsor's protocol ID
2025-7607
Acronym
Neo-VPP
Status last verified
Jul 2025
First submitted
19 Dec 2024
Last updated
16 Jul 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Repeated practice guided by peers and Instructor-guided deliberate practice in people with Ventilation Therapy; Complications and Technical Skills, run by Ahmed Moussa at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Jul 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Participant satisfaction with the quality of the educational methods assessed by a questionnaire (time frame: 6 months). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Jul 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in