Migraine DisorderATOMNCT06882122
Neurophysiological and Biomolecular Effects of Atogepant in Episodic Migraine
An observational study of Migraine Disorder and Episodic Migraine, run by IRCCS National Neurological Institute "C. Mondino" Foundation at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
The investigators aim to assess and compare neurophysiological and biochemical changes induced by a 3-month treatment with atogepant (60 mg daily) in patients with high-frequency episodic migraine (8-14 monthly migraine days). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Migraine Disorder, Episodic Migraine
- What is being tested?
- Atogepant 60 mg
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- 1 Dec 2024to Apr 2026
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Subjects with high frequency episodic migraine attending the outpatient clinic of the Headache Science \& Neurorehabilitation Center of the IRCCS Mondino Foundation (Pavia, Italy).
Who may be able to join
- Individuals aged between 18 and 70;
- Diagnosis of episodic migraine according to ICHD-3 criteria;
- Monthly migraine days between 8 and 14 (high-frequency episodic migraine pattern) in the 3 months before screening;
- Individuals naïve to CGRP-targeted treatments;
- No more than one ongoing migraine preventive treatment with a stable dose for at least 3 months.
Who cannot join
- Contraindications to atogepant;
- History of serious psychiatric conditions;
- Diagnosis of other primary or secondary headaches (only sporadic tension-type headache is allowed);
- Medical conditions considered clinically significant by the investigator;
- Chronic pain conditions that need chronic treatment;
- Abuse of alcohol and/or drugs;
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Italy1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Headache Science & Neurorehabilitation Center
Pavia, PAVIA, 27100
Francescantonio Cammarota, 00390382380425, francesco.cammarota@mondino.it
Cinzia Fattore, 00390382380385, cinzia.fattore@mondino.it
About this study
Official title: Neurophysiological and Biomolecular Effects of Atogepant in High Frequency Episodic Migraine (ATOM Project)
The investigators aim to assess and compare neurophysiological and biochemical changes induced by a 3-month treatment with atogepant (60 mg daily) in patients with high-frequency episodic migraine (8-14 monthly migraine days). Evaluations will include neurophysiological assessments (High-Density EEG, nociceptive reflexes, and visual evoked potentials) and biomolecular profiling (gene expression of endocannabinoid catabolizing enzymes, CGRP and PACAP plasma levels, and headache-specific microRNAs). Outputs will contribute to defining predictors of atogepant response, elucidating its effects on brain connectivity, excitability, and CGRP/endocannabinoid pathways, and identifying alternative therapeutic targets for non-responders.
Read the detailed description
BACKGROUND:
Migraine is a highly prevalent neurological disease associated to a severe burden for patients and society. Despite recent advances, the knowledge of the molecular and biochemical pathways that turn on and off a migraine attack and lead to an increased frequency of attacks is still limited. In addition, the lack of predictors of the therapeutic response is a barrier to access to care and to a personalized approach. In recent years, several migraine-specific drugs have become available for the preventive treatment of the disease, which is aimed at reducing the frequency and the intensity of the attacks. Among the drugs currently available for migraine treatment, there are molecules that directly interfere with the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway. Gepants, oral drugs that are CGRP receptor antagonists, represent a recently available pharmacological class for the acute and preventive treatment of migraines due to their specific mechanism of action.
The potential mechanism underlying the therapeutic benefit derived from drugs that block CGRP, as well as their impact on various biochemical and functional parameters associated with migraine pathophysiology, remains a topic of debate.
The objective of the ATOM project is to characterize the neurophysiological and biomolecular mechanisms underlying the therapeutic action of Atogepant (ATO), a drug belonging to the new pharmacological class of gepants. ATO has been shown to be effective in the preventive treatment of both chronic and episodic migraine. However, preventive treatment with gepants is still ineffective (reducing the number of monthly migraine days by less than 50%) in 30% of patients. This finding suggests that other biological pathways independent of CGRP may play a role in migraine pathophysiology. Among these, the endocannabinoid system has gained increasing importance over the years.
From a neurofunctional perspective, central sensitization is a significant aspect of migraine pathophysiology. Our group has demonstrated the utility of the nociceptive withdrawal reflex at the lower limb (RIII) in studying central sensitization. A subsequent study showed improvement in RIII reflex parameters in 30% of chronic migraine patients who responded to Erenumab after three months of treatment, suggesting a potential correlation between improved central sensitization and clinical benefit from anti-CGRP antibody treatment.
Additionally, migraine patients exhibit altered responses following repeated cranial stimulation, specifically a deficit in habituation to such stimuli. It has been described that the habituation pattern follows a characteristic course throughout the migraine cycle. The habituation deficit has been demonstrated through various neurophysiological methods, such as the nociceptive blink reflex (nBR) and visual evoked potentials (VEPs). These assessments provide information about the modulation of relevant stations in the trigemino-vascular system, specifically the trigemino-cervical complex and the occipital cortex.
Our study includes an evaluation of brain functional connectivity using High-Density Electroencephalography (HD-EEG). Recently, we analyzed potential variations in functional connectivity within the Resting State Network (RSN) in migraine patients undergoing six months of treatment with monoclonal antibodies targeting the CGRP pathway through serial HD-EEG evaluations (unpublished data). Our findings demonstrate that migraine patients, when compared to healthy controls, exhibit widespread hyperconnectivity in the theta and delta frequency bands, potentially attributable to dysfunction of the generators of these frequency bands, highlighting the importance of the thalamo-cortical dysrhythmia concept in migraine pathophysiology. Conversely, longitudinal comparisons revealed a trend towards normalization of connectivity in patients with a good clinical response to anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies.
From a biochemical standpoint, our group has demonstrated that the gene expression of endocannabinoid catabolizing enzymes - fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) and monoacylglycerol lipase (MAGL) - is altered in peripheral cells of patients with episodic and chronic migraine and is correlated with migraine severity. Similarly, various literature evidence supports the role of microRNAs in the mechanisms underlying migraines. Elevated expression levels of miR-382-5p and miR-34a-5p, combined with lower levels of miR-30a-5p expression, have been found in migraine patients compared to healthy controls, confirming an epigenetic alteration. In a previous study, we reported that peripheral levels of miR-382-5p and miR-34a-5p in migraine patients were correlated with disease severity, as they were increased in patients with chronic migraine and medication-overuse headache (CM-MOH) compared to episodic migraine (EM) patients, suggesting involvement in chronicization, while not excluding an influence of pharmacological migraine treatments . Elevated levels of miR-155, a microRNA known to modulate inflammation, have been found in peripheral cells of both EM and CM-MOH patients compared to healthy controls, with higher levels in chronic patients.
The overarching aim of this project is the identification of specific neurophysiological and biomolecular signatures that differentiate subjects with migraine who benefit or do not benefit from atogepant treatment. This aim will be achieved via a thorough neurophysiological and biochemical profiling of subjects with high frequency episodic migraine treated with atogepant 60 mg for a period of 3 months.
STUDY DESIGN:
Patients will be enrolled from those attending the outpatient clinic of IRCCS Mondino Institute (Pavia). The investigators will enroll 30 patients with high-frequency episodic migraine (8-14 monthly migraine days) with clinical indications to start atogepant (ATO - 60 mg daily) according to the Italian regulations.
The investigators will collect clinical data and perform biochemical and neurofunctional profiling of migraine patients at baseline (T0) and after three months of atogepant treatment (T1).
METHODS: All patients will undergo at T0 and T1:
- Biochemical profiling that will include analysis of:
- eCBome system: FAAH, MAGL mRNA in PBMCs;
- plasma levels of CGRP, PACAP, and VIP;
- miR-382-5p, miR-34a and miR-155 in PBMCs. The investigators will collect biochemical sampling between 9 and 11 a.m. to avoid circadian rhythm influence. All evaluation will be performed in the interictal phase. The following collection methods will be adopted: • mRNA and microRNA analysis in PBMCs. Blood samples will be collected within ethylenediamine tetra-acetic acid tubes, the investigators will first isolate PBMCs and total RNA. Ubiquitin C and U6 will act as housekeeping genes for genes coding for the eCBome enzymes and miRNAs. • CGRP alpha, PACAP-38 and VIP levels will be measured using a commercial enzyme linked immunosorbent assay.
- Neurofunctional profiling that will include:
- recording of the Nociceptive Withdrawal Reflex (RIII);
- recording of the nociceptive Blink Reflex (nBR);
- recording of High-Density EEG (HD-EEG);
- recording of Visual Evoked Potentials (VEP). The following methods will be adopted: - Nociceptive Withdrawal Reflex (RIII reflex): The sural nerve will be stimulated via surface electrodes behind the right lateral malleolus. Reflex threshold (≥20 μV, >10 msec) will be determined using the ladder method. Temporal summation threshold (TST) will be assessed by increasing stimulus intensity (5 stimuli at 2 Hz) until facilitation of the reflex response appears. (De Icco et al., 2020).- Nociceptive Blink Reflex (nBR): nBR R2 response will be recorded using a concentric electrode above the supraorbital nerve and surface electrodes at the orbicularis oculi muscle. Habituation will be evaluated with 25 stimuli at varying frequencies, with area under the curve (AUC) calculated for 5 averaged blocks. Habituation index (HI) will reflect percentage change in AUC from the last to the first block. (Perrotta et al., 2017). - Visual Evoked Potentials (VEP) recording: VEP will be recorded during monocular stimulation using black-and-white checkered patterns. Components (N70, P100, N145) will be analyzed, and habituation will be defined as the percentage change in P100 amplitude between the last and first block. (Ambrosini et al., 2017). High Density Electroencephalography recording (HD-EEG): Recordings (128 channels, high-pass: 0.5 Hz, low-pass: 100 Hz) will include four 6-minute resting-state sessions (2 with eyes open, 2 with eyes closed). Frequency bands (delta to gamma) will be analyzed using a validated custom pipeline to reconstruct cortical/subcortical neural sources.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Sample size calculation was performed for the primary outcome of ATOM project (namely compare the TST threshold of the RIII reflex between T0 and T1. From previous papers, preliminary data and experience of our research group, an expected difference between the means at T0 and T1 of 2 mA is inferred, with a standard deviation of 4 mA for both measurements. The comparison will be made by t test for paired data or corresponding nonparametric test (Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test), after performing a preliminary test on the normality of the data (Shapiro test). The investigators will consider a test power of β=0.8 and a 95% confidence. The suggested sample size is n=30. Regarding the co-primary outcome (Aim 2 - gene expression of MAGLs in PBMCs) a power analysis was performed, considering a significant difference between T0 and T1 of 5 RQ (standard deviation 4 and 10 respectively). Assuming a sample size of 30, the expected power is more than 80%.
- Conditions
- Migraine Disorder, Episodic Migraine
- Being tested
- Atogepant 60 mg
- Keywords
- Migraine, Gepants, endocannabinoid system, MicroRNAs, Habituation deficit, Central sensitization, Functional Connectivity
- Medical subject headings
- Migraine Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Atogepant 60 mgDrug
Atogepant 60 mg daily for 3 months
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| HFEM group | High-frequency episodic migraine patients (8-14 migraine days per months) undergoing atogepant 60 mg daily for 3 months Receives: Drug: Atogepant 60 mg |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Temporal summation threshold of the RIII reflex (continuos variable)
Temporal summation threshold of the RIII reflex will be used to assess central sensitization after 3 months of treatment with atogepant 60 mg/day compared to baseline.
Measured: Baseline (T0) - three months of atogepant 60 mg treatment (T1)
MAGL gene expression (continuos variable)
Changes in MAGL gene expression after 3 months of treatment with atogepant 60 mg/day
Measured: Baseline (T0) - three months of atogepant 60 mg treatment (T1)
Secondary outcomes (7)
Habituation index of the nociceptive Blink Reflex (continuous variable)
"Habituation index" of the nociceptive Blink Reflex will be used to evaluate difference in brainstem habituation after three months of treatment with atogepant 60mg.
Measured: Baseline (T0) - three months of atogepant 60 mg treatment (T1)
Habituation of the visual evoked potential (continuous variable)
Habituation of the visual evoked potential, assessed through P100 amplitude between the last and first block, will be used to assess changes in cortical habituation after three months of atogepant
Measured: Baseline (T0) - three months of atogepant 60 mg treatment (T1)
Functional brain connectivity (continuous variable)
Changes in functional brain connectivity, assessed through HD-EEG after 3 months of treatment with atogepant 60 mg/day.
Measured: Baseline (T0) - three months of atogepant 60 mg treatment (T1)
FAAH gene expression (continuous variable)
Changes in FAAH gene expression after 3 months of treatment with atogepant 60 mg/day.
Measured: Baseline (T0) - three months of atogepant 60 mg treatment (T1)
Plasma levels of CGRP (continuous variable)
Changes in plasma levels of CGRP after 3 months of treatment with atogepant 60 mg/day.
Measured: Baseline (T0) - three months of atogepant 60 mg treatment (T1)
Plasma levels of PACAP (continuous variable)
Changes in plasma levels of PACAP after 3 months of treatment with atogepant 60 mg/day.
Measured: Baseline (T0) - three months of atogepant 60 mg treatment (T1)
Gene expression of miR-382-5p, miR-34a-5p, and miR-155 (continuous variables)
Changes in the gene expression of miR-382-5p, miR-34a-5p, and miR-155 after 3 months of treatment with atogepant 60 mg/day at the level of peripheral polymorphonuclear cells (PBMCs).
Measured: Baseline (T0) - three months of atogepant 60 mg treatment (T1)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Mar 2025
- Study start1 Dec 2024
- Primary completionDec 2025 (estimated)
- Study completionApr 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (16)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Migraine DisorderStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- IRCCS National Neurological Institute "C. Mondino" Foundation
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06882122
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ATOM
- Acronym
- ATOM
- Status last verified
- Mar 2025
- First submitted
- 11 Mar 2025
- Last updated
- 18 Mar 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Greco R, De Icco R, Demartini C, Zanaboni AM, Tumelero E, Sances G, Allena M, Tassorelli C. Plasma levels of CGRP and expression of specific microRNAs in blood cells of episodic and chronic migraine subjects: towards the identification of a panel of peripheral biomarkers of migraine? J Headache Pain. 2020 Oct 16;21(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s10194-020-01189-0.
PubMed 33066724Andersen HH, Duroux M, Gazerani P. Serum MicroRNA Signatures in Migraineurs During Attacks and in Pain-Free Periods. Mol Neurobiol. 2016 Apr;53(3):1494-1500. doi: 10.1007/s12035-015-9106-5. Epub 2015 Feb 1.
PubMed 25636687Greco R, Demartini C, Zanaboni AM, Tumelero E, Icco R, Sances G, Allena M, Tassorelli C. Peripheral changes of endocannabinoid system components in episodic and chronic migraine patients: A pilot study. Cephalalgia. 2021 Feb;41(2):185-196. doi: 10.1177/0333102420949201. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
PubMed 32967434Greco R, Demartini C, Zanaboni AM, Francavilla M, De Icco R, Ahmad L, Tassorelli C. The endocannabinoid system and related lipids as potential targets for the treatment of migraine-related pain. Headache. 2022 Mar;62(3):227-240. doi: 10.1111/head.14267. Epub 2022 Feb 18.
PubMed 35179780de Tommaso M, Ambrosini A, Brighina F, Coppola G, Perrotta A, Pierelli F, Sandrini G, Valeriani M, Marinazzo D, Stramaglia S, Schoenen J. Altered processing of sensory stimuli in patients with migraine. Nat Rev Neurol. 2014 Mar;10(3):144-55. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2014.14. Epub 2014 Feb 18.
PubMed 24535465Ambrosini A, Kisialiou A, Schoenen J. Visual and auditory cortical evoked potentials in interictal episodic migraine: An audit on 624 patients from three centres. Response to the letter by Omland et al. Cephalalgia. 2017 Oct;37(12):1209-1210. doi: 10.1177/0333102416680616. Epub 2016 Nov 21. No abstract available.
PubMed 27872339Perrotta A, Anastasio MG, De Icco R, Coppola G, Ambrosini A, Serrao M, Sandrini G, Pierelli F. Frequency-Dependent Habituation Deficit of the Nociceptive Blink Reflex in Aura With Migraine Headache. Can Migraine Aura Modulate Trigeminal Excitability? Headache. 2017 Jun;57(6):887-898. doi: 10.1111/head.13111. Epub 2017 May 10.
PubMed 28488755Coppola G, Di Lorenzo C, Schoenen J, Pierelli F. Habituation and sensitization in primary headaches. J Headache Pain. 2013 Jul 30;14(1):65. doi: 10.1186/1129-2377-14-65.
PubMed 23899115De Icco R, Fiamingo G, Greco R, Bottiroli S, Demartini C, Zanaboni AM, Allena M, Guaschino E, Martinelli D, Putorti A, Grillo V, Sances G, Tassorelli C. Neurophysiological and biomolecular effects of erenumab in chronic migraine: An open label study. Cephalalgia. 2020 Oct;40(12):1336-1345. doi: 10.1177/0333102420942230. Epub 2020 Jul 26.
PubMed 32715736De Icco R, Greco R, Demartini C, Vergobbi P, Zanaboni A, Tumelero E, Reggiani A, Realini N, Sances G, Grillo V, Allena M, Tassorelli C. Spinal nociceptive sensitization and plasma palmitoylethanolamide levels during experimentally induced migraine attacks. Pain. 2021 Sep 1;162(9):2376-2385. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002223.
PubMed 33587406Lipton RB, Pozo-Rosich P, Blumenfeld AM, Li Y, Severt L, Stokes JT, Creutz L, Gandhi P, Dodick D. Effect of Atogepant for Preventive Migraine Treatment on Patient-Reported Outcomes in the Randomized, Double-blind, Phase 3 ADVANCE Trial. Neurology. 2023 Feb 21;100(8):e764-e777. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000201568. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
PubMed 36396451Rissardo JP, Caprara ALF. Gepants for Acute and Preventive Migraine Treatment: A Narrative Review. Brain Sci. 2022 Nov 24;12(12):1612. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12121612.
PubMed 36552072Pozo-Rosich P, Ailani J, Ashina M, Goadsby PJ, Lipton RB, Reuter U, Guo H, Schwefel B, Lu K, Boinpally R, Miceli R, De Abreu Ferreira R, McCusker E, Yu SY, Severt L, Finnegan M, Trugman JM. Atogepant for the preventive treatment of chronic migraine (PROGRESS): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2023 Sep 2;402(10404):775-785. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01049-8. Epub 2023 Jul 26.
PubMed 37516125Goadsby PJ, Dodick DW, Ailani J, Trugman JM, Finnegan M, Lu K, Szegedi A. Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of orally administered atogepant for the prevention of episodic migraine in adults: a double-blind, randomised phase 2b/3 trial. Lancet Neurol. 2020 Sep;19(9):727-737. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30234-9.
PubMed 32822633Ailani J, Lipton RB, Goadsby PJ, Guo H, Miceli R, Severt L, Finnegan M, Trugman JM; ADVANCE Study Group. Atogepant for the Preventive Treatment of Migraine. N Engl J Med. 2021 Aug 19;385(8):695-706. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2035908.
PubMed 34407343
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Mar 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Neurophysiological and Biomolecular Effects of Atogepant in High Frequency Episodic Migraine (ATOM Project)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06882122
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ATOM / ATOM
- Conditions
- Migraine Disorder, Episodic Migraine
- Keywords
- Migraine, Gepants, endocannabinoid system, MicroRNAs, Habituation deficit, Central sensitization, Functional Connectivity
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- IRCCS National Neurological Institute "C. Mondino" FoundationUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Dec 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Apr 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 18 Mar 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The investigators aim to assess and compare neurophysiological and biochemical changes induced by a 3-month treatment with atogepant (60 mg daily) in patients with high-frequency episodic migraine (8-14 monthly migraine days). Evaluations will include neurophysiological assessments (High-Density EEG, nociceptive reflexes, and visual evoked potentials) and biomolecular profiling (gene expression of endocannabinoid catabolizing enzymes, CGRP and PACAP plasma levels, and headache-specific microRNAs). Outputs will contribute to defining predictors of atogepant response, elucidating its effects on brain connectivity, excitability, and CGRP/endocannabinoid pathways, and identifying alternative therapeutic targets for non-responders.
Detailed description
BACKGROUND:
Migraine is a highly prevalent neurological disease associated to a severe burden for patients and society. Despite recent advances, the knowledge of the molecular and biochemical pathways that turn on and off a migraine attack and lead to an increased frequency of attacks is still limited. In addition, the lack of predictors of the therapeutic response is a barrier to access to care and to a personalized approach. In recent years, several migraine-specific drugs have become available for the preventive treatment of the disease, which is aimed at reducing the frequency and the intensity of the attacks. Among the drugs currently available for migraine treatment, there are molecules that directly interfere with the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway. Gepants, oral drugs that are CGRP receptor antagonists, represent a recently available pharmacological class for the acute and preventive treatment of migraines due to their specific mechanism of action.
The potential mechanism underlying the therapeutic benefit derived from drugs that block CGRP, as well as their impact on various biochemical and functional parameters associated with migraine pathophysiology, remains a topic of debate.
The objective of the ATOM project is to characterize the neurophysiological and biomolecular mechanisms underlying the therapeutic action of Atogepant (ATO), a drug belonging to the new pharmacological class of gepants. ATO has been shown to be effective in the preventive treatment of both chronic and episodic migraine. However, preventive treatment with gepants is still ineffective (reducing the number of monthly migraine days by less than 50%) in 30% of patients. This finding suggests that other biological pathways independent of CGRP may play a role in migraine pathophysiology. Among these, the endocannabinoid system has gained increasing importance over the years.
From a neurofunctional perspective, central sensitization is a significant aspect of migraine pathophysiology. Our group has demonstrated the utility of the nociceptive withdrawal reflex at the lower limb (RIII) in studying central sensitization. A subsequent study showed improvement in RIII reflex parameters in 30% of chronic migraine patients who responded to Erenumab after three months of treatment, suggesting a potential correlation between improved central sensitization and clinical benefit from anti-CGRP antibody treatment.
Additionally, migraine patients exhibit altered responses following repeated cranial stimulation, specifically a deficit in habituation to such stimuli. It has been described that the habituation pattern follows a characteristic course throughout the migraine cycle. The habituation deficit has been demonstrated through various neurophysiological methods, such as the nociceptive blink reflex (nBR) and visual evoked potentials (VEPs). These assessments provide information about the modulation of relevant stations in the trigemino-vascular system, specifically the trigemino-cervical complex and the occipital cortex.
Our study includes an evaluation of brain functional connectivity using High-Density Electroencephalography (HD-EEG). Recently, we analyzed potential variations in functional connectivity within the Resting State Network (RSN) in migraine patients undergoing six months of treatment with monoclonal antibodies targeting the CGRP pathway through serial HD-EEG evaluations (unpublished data). Our findings demonstrate that migraine patients, when compared to healthy controls, exhibit widespread hyperconnectivity in the theta and delta frequency bands, potentially attributable to dysfunction of the generators of these frequency bands, highlighting the importance of the thalamo-cortical dysrhythmia concept in migraine pathophysiology. Conversely, longitudinal comparisons revealed a trend towards normalization of connectivity in patients with a good clinical response to anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies.
From a biochemical standpoint, our group has demonstrated that the gene expression of endocannabinoid catabolizing enzymes - fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) and monoacylglycerol lipase (MAGL) - is altered in peripheral cells of patients with episodic and chronic migraine and is correlated with migraine severity. Similarly, various literature evidence supports the role of microRNAs in the mechanisms underlying migraines. Elevated expression levels of miR-382-5p and miR-34a-5p, combined with lower levels of miR-30a-5p expression, have been found in migraine patients compared to healthy controls, confirming an epigenetic alteration. In a previous study, we reported that peripheral levels of miR-382-5p and miR-34a-5p in migraine patients were correlated with disease severity, as they were increased in patients with chronic migraine and medication-overuse headache (CM-MOH) compared to episodic migraine (EM) patients, suggesting involvement in chronicization, while not excluding an influence of pharmacological migraine treatments . Elevated levels of miR-155, a microRNA known to modulate inflammation, have been found in peripheral cells of both EM and CM-MOH patients compared to healthy controls, with higher levels in chronic patients.
The overarching aim of this project is the identification of specific neurophysiological and biomolecular signatures that differentiate subjects with migraine who benefit or do not benefit from atogepant treatment. This aim will be achieved via a thorough neurophysiological and biochemical profiling of subjects with high frequency episodic migraine treated with atogepant 60 mg for a period of 3 months.
STUDY DESIGN:
Patients will be enrolled from those attending the outpatient clinic of IRCCS Mondino Institute (Pavia). The investigators will enroll 30 patients with high-frequency episodic migraine (8-14 monthly migraine days) with clinical indications to start atogepant (ATO - 60 mg daily) according to the Italian regulations.
The investigators will collect clinical data and perform biochemical and neurofunctional profiling of migraine patients at baseline (T0) and after three months of atogepant treatment (T1).
METHODS: All patients will undergo at T0 and T1:
- Biochemical profiling that will include analysis of:
- eCBome system: FAAH, MAGL mRNA in PBMCs;
- plasma levels of CGRP, PACAP, and VIP;
- miR-382-5p, miR-34a and miR-155 in PBMCs. The investigators will collect biochemical sampling between 9 and 11 a.m. to avoid circadian rhythm influence. All evaluation will be performed in the interictal phase. The following collection methods will be adopted: • mRNA and microRNA analysis in PBMCs. Blood samples will be collected within ethylenediamine tetra-acetic acid tubes, the investigators will first isolate PBMCs and total RNA. Ubiquitin C and U6 will act as housekeeping genes for genes coding for the eCBome enzymes and miRNAs. • CGRP alpha, PACAP-38 and VIP levels will be measured using a commercial enzyme linked immunosorbent assay.
- Neurofunctional profiling that will include:
- recording of the Nociceptive Withdrawal Reflex (RIII);
- recording of the nociceptive Blink Reflex (nBR);
- recording of High-Density EEG (HD-EEG);
- recording of Visual Evoked Potentials (VEP). The following methods will be adopted: - Nociceptive Withdrawal Reflex (RIII reflex): The sural nerve will be stimulated via surface electrodes behind the right lateral malleolus. Reflex threshold (≥20 μV, >10 msec) will be determined using the ladder method. Temporal summation threshold (TST) will be assessed by increasing stimulus intensity (5 stimuli at 2 Hz) until facilitation of the reflex response appears. (De Icco et al., 2020).- Nociceptive Blink Reflex (nBR): nBR R2 response will be recorded using a concentric electrode above the supraorbital nerve and surface electrodes at the orbicularis oculi muscle. Habituation will be evaluated with 25 stimuli at varying frequencies, with area under the curve (AUC) calculated for 5 averaged blocks. Habituation index (HI) will reflect percentage change in AUC from the last to the first block. (Perrotta et al., 2017). - Visual Evoked Potentials (VEP) recording: VEP will be recorded during monocular stimulation using black-and-white checkered patterns. Components (N70, P100, N145) will be analyzed, and habituation will be defined as the percentage change in P100 amplitude between the last and first block. (Ambrosini et al., 2017). High Density Electroencephalography recording (HD-EEG): Recordings (128 channels, high-pass: 0.5 Hz, low-pass: 100 Hz) will include four 6-minute resting-state sessions (2 with eyes open, 2 with eyes closed). Frequency bands (delta to gamma) will be analyzed using a validated custom pipeline to reconstruct cortical/subcortical neural sources.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Sample size calculation was performed for the primary outcome of ATOM project (namely compare the TST threshold of the RIII reflex between T0 and T1. From previous papers, preliminary data and experience of our research group, an expected difference between the means at T0 and T1 of 2 mA is inferred, with a standard deviation of 4 mA for both measurements. The comparison will be made by t test for paired data or corresponding nonparametric test (Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test), after performing a preliminary test on the normality of the data (Shapiro test). The investigators will consider a test power of β=0.8 and a 95% confidence. The suggested sample size is n=30. Regarding the co-primary outcome (Aim 2 - gene expression of MAGLs in PBMCs) a power analysis was performed, considering a significant difference between T0 and T1 of 5 RQ (standard deviation 4 and 10 respectively). Assuming a sample size of 30, the expected power is more than 80%.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| HFEM group | – | Drug: Atogepant 60 mgHigh-frequency episodic migraine patients (8-14 migraine days per months) undergoing atogepant 60 mg daily for 3 months |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Subjects with high frequency episodic migraine attending the outpatient clinic of the Headache Science \& Neurorehabilitation Center of the IRCCS Mondino Foundation (Pavia, Italy).
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Individuals aged between 18 and 70;
- Diagnosis of episodic migraine according to ICHD-3 criteria;
- Monthly migraine days between 8 and 14 (high-frequency episodic migraine pattern) in the 3 months before screening;
- Individuals naïve to CGRP-targeted treatments;
- No more than one ongoing migraine preventive treatment with a stable dose for at least 3 months.
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Contraindications to atogepant;
- History of serious psychiatric conditions;
- Diagnosis of other primary or secondary headaches (only sporadic tension-type headache is allowed);
- Medical conditions considered clinically significant by the investigator;
- Chronic pain conditions that need chronic treatment;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Atogepant 60 mgAtogepant 60 mg daily for 3 months | Drug | HFEM group |
Primary outcome
Temporal summation threshold of the RIII reflex (continuos variable)
Time frame: Baseline (T0) - three months of atogepant 60 mg treatment (T1)
Temporal summation threshold of the RIII reflex will be used to assess central sensitization after 3 months of treatment with atogepant 60 mg/day compared to baseline.
MAGL gene expression (continuos variable)
Time frame: Baseline (T0) - three months of atogepant 60 mg treatment (T1)
Changes in MAGL gene expression after 3 months of treatment with atogepant 60 mg/day
7 secondary outcomes
Habituation index of the nociceptive Blink Reflex (continuous variable)
Time frame: Baseline (T0) - three months of atogepant 60 mg treatment (T1)
Habituation of the visual evoked potential (continuous variable)
Time frame: Baseline (T0) - three months of atogepant 60 mg treatment (T1)
Functional brain connectivity (continuous variable)
Time frame: Baseline (T0) - three months of atogepant 60 mg treatment (T1)
FAAH gene expression (continuous variable)
Time frame: Baseline (T0) - three months of atogepant 60 mg treatment (T1)
Plasma levels of CGRP (continuous variable)
Time frame: Baseline (T0) - three months of atogepant 60 mg treatment (T1)
Plasma levels of PACAP (continuous variable)
Time frame: Baseline (T0) - three months of atogepant 60 mg treatment (T1)
Gene expression of miR-382-5p, miR-34a-5p, and miR-155 (continuous variables)
Time frame: Baseline (T0) - three months of atogepant 60 mg treatment (T1)
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Mar 2025.
- Background: PubMed 33066724Greco R, De Icco R, Demartini C, Zanaboni AM, Tumelero E, Sances G, Allena M, Tassorelli C. Plasma levels of CGRP and expression of specific microRNAs in blood cells of episodic and chronic migraine subjects: towards the identification of a panel of peripheral biomarkers of migraine? J Headache Pain. 2020 Oct 16;21(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s10194-020-01189-0.
- Background: PubMed 25636687Andersen HH, Duroux M, Gazerani P. Serum MicroRNA Signatures in Migraineurs During Attacks and in Pain-Free Periods. Mol Neurobiol. 2016 Apr;53(3):1494-1500. doi: 10.1007/s12035-015-9106-5. Epub 2015 Feb 1.
- Background: PubMed 32967434Greco R, Demartini C, Zanaboni AM, Tumelero E, Icco R, Sances G, Allena M, Tassorelli C. Peripheral changes of endocannabinoid system components in episodic and chronic migraine patients: A pilot study. Cephalalgia. 2021 Feb;41(2):185-196. doi: 10.1177/0333102420949201. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
- Background: PubMed 35179780Greco R, Demartini C, Zanaboni AM, Francavilla M, De Icco R, Ahmad L, Tassorelli C. The endocannabinoid system and related lipids as potential targets for the treatment of migraine-related pain. Headache. 2022 Mar;62(3):227-240. doi: 10.1111/head.14267. Epub 2022 Feb 18.
- Background: PubMed 24535465de Tommaso M, Ambrosini A, Brighina F, Coppola G, Perrotta A, Pierelli F, Sandrini G, Valeriani M, Marinazzo D, Stramaglia S, Schoenen J. Altered processing of sensory stimuli in patients with migraine. Nat Rev Neurol. 2014 Mar;10(3):144-55. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2014.14. Epub 2014 Feb 18.
- Background: PubMed 27872339Ambrosini A, Kisialiou A, Schoenen J. Visual and auditory cortical evoked potentials in interictal episodic migraine: An audit on 624 patients from three centres. Response to the letter by Omland et al. Cephalalgia. 2017 Oct;37(12):1209-1210. doi: 10.1177/0333102416680616. Epub 2016 Nov 21. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 28488755Perrotta A, Anastasio MG, De Icco R, Coppola G, Ambrosini A, Serrao M, Sandrini G, Pierelli F. Frequency-Dependent Habituation Deficit of the Nociceptive Blink Reflex in Aura With Migraine Headache. Can Migraine Aura Modulate Trigeminal Excitability? Headache. 2017 Jun;57(6):887-898. doi: 10.1111/head.13111. Epub 2017 May 10.
- Background: PubMed 23899115Coppola G, Di Lorenzo C, Schoenen J, Pierelli F. Habituation and sensitization in primary headaches. J Headache Pain. 2013 Jul 30;14(1):65. doi: 10.1186/1129-2377-14-65.
- Background: PubMed 32715736De Icco R, Fiamingo G, Greco R, Bottiroli S, Demartini C, Zanaboni AM, Allena M, Guaschino E, Martinelli D, Putorti A, Grillo V, Sances G, Tassorelli C. Neurophysiological and biomolecular effects of erenumab in chronic migraine: An open label study. Cephalalgia. 2020 Oct;40(12):1336-1345. doi: 10.1177/0333102420942230. Epub 2020 Jul 26.
- Background: PubMed 33587406De Icco R, Greco R, Demartini C, Vergobbi P, Zanaboni A, Tumelero E, Reggiani A, Realini N, Sances G, Grillo V, Allena M, Tassorelli C. Spinal nociceptive sensitization and plasma palmitoylethanolamide levels during experimentally induced migraine attacks. Pain. 2021 Sep 1;162(9):2376-2385. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002223.
- Background: PubMed 36396451Lipton RB, Pozo-Rosich P, Blumenfeld AM, Li Y, Severt L, Stokes JT, Creutz L, Gandhi P, Dodick D. Effect of Atogepant for Preventive Migraine Treatment on Patient-Reported Outcomes in the Randomized, Double-blind, Phase 3 ADVANCE Trial. Neurology. 2023 Feb 21;100(8):e764-e777. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000201568. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
- Background: PubMed 36552072Rissardo JP, Caprara ALF. Gepants for Acute and Preventive Migraine Treatment: A Narrative Review. Brain Sci. 2022 Nov 24;12(12):1612. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12121612.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Migraine Disorder
RecruitingObservational study
Study of the Glymphatic System in Migraine
Migraine
Active, not recruiting
Clinical and Neurophysiological Effects of tDCS to Visual and Motor Cortex in Migraine
Migraine
Active, not recruiting
App-Based Migraine Treatment: The Health enSuite Study
Migraine, Migraine With Aura
Not yet recruiting
A Prospective Study of Rimegepant for Short-term Preventive Treatment of Night-shift-related Migraine in Healthcare Professionals
Migraine Disorders
Recruiting
Marine Lipids Ease Painful TMD
Temporomandibular Disorder (TMD)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Migraine Disorder and Episodic Migraine, run by IRCCS National Neurological Institute "C. Mondino" Foundation at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Francescantonio Cammarota, MD (00390382380425, francesco.cammarota@mondino.it), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Temporal summation threshold of the RIII reflex (continuos variable) (time frame: Baseline (T0) - three months of atogepant 60 mg treatment (T1)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06882122, which also lists 16 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Mar 2025.