AzTrials
AzTrials

HeadacheNCT06885216

Outcomes After Surgery for Degenerative Cervical Radiculopathy in Patients with Concurrent Headache

An observational study of Headache and Cervical Radiculopathy, run by University Hospital of North Norway.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Surgery for degenerative cervical radiculopathy (DCR) is one of the most common causes of neck surgery. The typical surgical indication is radicular pain (arm pain) caused by nerve impingement. However, many patients also report varying degrees of pain in the neck and head. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 16 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Headache, Cervical Radiculopathy
What is being tested?
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion/ posterior decompression
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
12,000 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
1 Jan 2012to 31 Dec 2023
How long will I take part?
12 Months
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 16 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: The study will include consecutive patients operated for DCR in public and private hospitals and registered in the NORspine from January 2012 to December 2022.

Who may be able to join

  • Patients 16 years or above and operated for degenerative cervical radiculopathy (disc herniation or spondylosis)
  • Single level or multiple (primary surgery)
  • Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with or without plate
  • Artificial cervical disc replacement

Who cannot join

  • Degenerative cervical myelopathy, tumour, inflammation, infection and trauma
  • Previous surgery in the cervical spine
  • Corpectomy
  • Posterior approach as laminectomi with or without fusion and foramenotomi

About this study

Official title: Patient Characteristics, Prognosis and Outcome Measures in Patients with Concurrent Neck Associated Headache Operated for Degenerative Cervical Radiculopathy. a Population Based Study by NORspine

Surgery for degenerative cervical radiculopathy (DCR) is one of the most common causes of neck surgery. The typical surgical indication is radicular pain (arm pain) caused by nerve impingement. However, many patients also report varying degrees of pain in the neck and head. This headache, often referred to as cervicogenic headache (CEH), is believed to result from the convergence of trigeminal afferents and the upper three cervical spinal nerves in structures such as facet joints, ligaments, cervical muscles, intervertebral and nerve roots.

The diagnostic criteria used to distinguish CEH from the other types of headaches are based on low to moderate evidence and can be challenging due to their similar clinical presentations. Nevertheless, headache disorders are a common cause of disability and many patients undergoing surgery for DCR report headache. However, prior reports assessing headache in patients surgically treated for DCR are limited by small sample sizes, inconsistent inclusion criteria and outcome measures. Consequently, there is limited understanding about the frequency of DCR associated headache and whether these patients experience meaningful improvements in their headache following surgical treatment.

The aims of this study are to assess 1) the frequency of DCR associated headache in patients operated for DCR, 2) the minimal clinical important change for NRS headache 3) if DCR associated headache is an independent prognostic factor for neck pain-related disability and 4) if patients experience improvement in their headache 12 months after surgery for DCR.

Read the detailed description

Hypothesis:

Our null hypothesis is that DCR patients with and without concomitant headache have similar outcomes after surgery. Our alternative hypothesis is that concomitant headache is a negative predictor for a favourable outcome of DCR surgery, i.e. an effect size less than the MCIC value for improvement.

Data source:

The project will use prospectively collected data from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery (NORspine). The NORspine is a comprehensive national clinical registry, with a capture rate of patients operated for DCR of 75% from 2021 and a response rate at 12 months follow-up of 80% in 2022. The coverage rate at the institutional level is 95-100%.

Analyses and reporting will be conducted according to the methodology proposed by PROGRESS (prognosis research strategy) framework, and reported according to the STROBE (strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology) statement.

Data collection:

Demographic variables, smoking, educational level, duration of symptoms, status on sick leave, working and disability status are collected at admission (baseline). Comorbidity, diagnosis, treatment as well as perioperative complications are recorded by surgeons. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are recorded at admission (baseline) and 3- and 12 months follow-up time) after surgery.

Statistical analyses:

The invastigators will select patients with both headache and neck pain assessed with the NRS to assess the frequency of DCR associated headache.

To determine the MCIC of DCR associated headache the invastigators will use the global perceived effect (GPE) scale as the external criterion (anchor). The invastigators will assess the mean NRS headache score at 12 months, change score between baseline and 12 months follow-up and the corresponding percentage change score. A cut-off value for the NRS headache MCIC will be obtained by assessing values of sensitivity and specificity receiver operating curve (ROC).

Univariable and multivariable analyses will be used to evaluate if NRS headache is a potential prognostic factor against the NDI (35% improvement (yes/no) using binary logistic regression, adjusted for a priori selection of confounding factors. A p-value of <0.05 will be considered statistically significant.

Being tested
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion/ posterior decompression
Medical subject headings
Headache, Radiculopathy

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion/ posterior decompressionProcedure or surgery

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Neck disability index (NDI)

    The NDI measures how neck pain affects daily life in the following domains: pain, personal care, lifting, reading, headaches, concentration, work, driving, sleeping and recreation, using a 6-point ordinal scale (0-5). The 10 items are summarized and recalculated to a percentage score ranging from 0 to 100 (no to maximum disability). The NDI percentage change will be dichotomized to 35% improvement (yes/no).

    Measured: 3- and 12 months

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. NDI headache

    NDI headache scale contains the following responses: (0) "I have no headaches at all", (1) "I have slight headaches, which come infrequently", (2) "I have moderate headaches, which come infrequently", (3) "I have moderate headaches, which come frequently", (4) "I have severe headaches, which come frequently" and (5) "I have headaches almost all the time".

    Measured: 3- and 12 months

  2. Numeric rating scale for neck pain (NRS-NP)

    NRS-NP assesses pain severity ranging from 0 to 10 ("no" to "worst conceivable pain").

    Measured: 3- and 12 months

  3. Numeric rating scale for arm pain (NRS-AP)

    NRS-AP assesses pain severity ranging from 0 to 10 ("no" to "worst conceivable pain").

    Measured: 3- and 12 months

  4. NRS-HA

    Numeric rating scale for headache (NRS-HA) assesses pain severity ranging from 0 to 10 ("no" to "worst conceivable pain").

    Measured: 3- and 12 months

  5. Global perceived effect (GPE)

    GPE scale measures the perceived benefit after surgery: (1) "completely recovered," (2) "much improved," (3) "slightly improved," (4) "unchanged," (5) "slightly worse," (6) "much worse", and (7) "worse than ever."

    Measured: 3- and 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Mar 2025
  2. Study start1 Jan 2012
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2023
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
12,000 participants (actual)
Target duration
12 Months
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06885216
Sponsor's protocol ID
03276-1
Status last verified
Apr 2024
First submitted
18 Mar 2025
Last updated
26 Mar 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: Due to patient sensitiv data content.

Publications

  • Carette S, Fehlings MG. Clinical practice. Cervical radiculopathy. N Engl J Med. 2005 Jul 28;353(4):392-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp043887. No abstract available.

    PubMed 16049211
  • Bogduk N. Cervicogenic headache: anatomic basis and pathophysiologic mechanisms. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2001 Aug;5(4):382-6. doi: 10.1007/s11916-001-0029-7.

    PubMed 11403743
  • Demont A, Lafrance S, Benaissa L, Mawet J. Cervicogenic headache, an easy diagnosis? A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic studies. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2022 Dec;62:102640. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2022.102640. Epub 2022 Aug 31.

    PubMed 36088782
  • GBD 2017 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2018 Nov 10;392(10159):1789-1858. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32279-7. Epub 2018 Nov 8.

    PubMed 30496104
  • Torbjorn AF, Stolt-Nielsen A, Skaanes KO, Sjaastad O. Headache and the lower cervical spine: long-term, postoperative follow-up after decompressive neck surgery. Funct Neurol. 2003 Jan-Mar;18(1):17-28.

    PubMed 12760410
  • Liu H, Ploumis A, Wang S, Li C, Li H. Treatment of Cervicogenic Headache Concurrent With Cervical Stenosis by Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion. Clin Spine Surg. 2017 Oct;30(8):E1093-E1097. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000291.

    PubMed 28937465
  • Hemingway H, Riley RD, Altman DG. Ten steps towards improving prognosis research. BMJ. 2009 Dec 30;339:b4184. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b4184. No abstract available.

    PubMed 20042483
  • von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP; STROBE Initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet. 2007 Oct 20;370(9596):1453-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61602-X.

    PubMed 18064739
  • Vernon H. The Neck Disability Index: state-of-the-art, 1991-2008. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2008 Sep;31(7):491-502. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.08.006.

    PubMed 18803999
  • Dolan P. Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med Care. 1997 Nov;35(11):1095-108. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199711000-00002.

    PubMed 9366889
  • Haefeli M, Elfering A. Pain assessment. Eur Spine J. 2006 Jan;15 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S17-24. doi: 10.1007/s00586-005-1044-x. Epub 2005 Dec 1.

    PubMed 16320034

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Headache and Cervical Radiculopathy, run by University Hospital of North Norway.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Neck disability index (NDI) (time frame: 3- and 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06885216, which also lists 11 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Mar 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in