AzTrials
AzTrials

Pregnancy RelatedNCT06892665

The Effect of HPI to Reduce Intraoperative Hypotension in Caesarean Sections

A study testing Hypotension prediction index and Non invasive Blood Pressure Monitoring in people with Pregnancy Related and Hypotension, run by National University of Malaysia at 1 site in Malaysia.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

During caesarean section, blood pressure variations especially a reduction in blood pressure (or hypotension) can bring harmful effects to mother and baby. This usually occurs after spinal anaesthesia is administered. Usually, the anaesthetist will treat hypotension as it occurs. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 40 years, women only
What is being tested?
Hypotension prediction index and Non invasive Blood Pressure Monitoring
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteMalaysia
Study dates
1 Dec 2024to 31 Dec 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 40 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • ≥ 37 weeks of gestation
  • Elective CS
  • Age between 18 - 40 years old
  • Singleton pregnancy
  • Planned for spinal anaesthesia

Who cannot join

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) III and above
  • Body mass index (BMI) ≥ 40 kg/m2
  • Increased risk of developing peripartum haemorrhage
  • History of peripartum haemorrhage
  • Placenta previa major, accrete, increta, percreta
  • Gravida ≥ 5
Show all 12Show fewer
  • Presence of large uterine fibroids
  • Congenital bleeding disorders such as Haemophilia A, Haemophilia B and Von Willebrand disease
  • Acquired bleeding disorders such as thrombocytopenia and coagulopathy
  • Contraindications to finger cuff orNIBP application, such as finger ischaemia, upper limb neurological deficit, discoloured nail
  • Cardiac arrhythmias and aortic regurgitation
  • Patient's refusal

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Malaysia1 site
  • Hospital Canselor Tuanku Muhriz

    Cheras, Kuala Lumpur, 56000

Other trials in Malaysia

About this study

Official title: The Effect Of Using Hypotension Prediction Index To Reduce Intraoperative Hypotension In Caesarean Sections: A Randomised Controlled Trial

During caesarean section, blood pressure variations especially a reduction in blood pressure (or hypotension) can bring harmful effects to mother and baby. This usually occurs after spinal anaesthesia is administered. Usually, the anaesthetist will treat hypotension as it occurs. However, a new medical device is now available to predict hypotension. It is called the Hypotension Prediction Index (HPI). This device allows the prediction of hypotension; hence, treatment can be given before it occurs. It has been widely utilised in major surgeries like abdominal tumour surgery and cardiac surgery worldwide and has shown a substantial reduction in hypotension. This study aims to determine whether the duration and severity of hypotension can be reduced when HPI is used in lower segment caesarean sections. The secondary objective of the study is to determine if the complication rate can be reduced in both mother and baby.

Read the detailed description

Hypotension Prediction Index (HPI) has been shown to reduce IOH significantly in non-cardiac and major abdominal surgeries.The role of HPI beyond reducing IOH has also been a subject of research. Andrzejeska et al. demonstrated that the use of HPI in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery leads to lower reductions in post-surgery haemoglobin levels, shorter duration of hypotension and shorter hospital admissions. Additionally, the intervention group had shorter timeframes from the end of surgery to extubation.

The development of a non-invasive finger blood pressure device compatible with HPI called the Acumen IQ cuff, made it possible to use HPI without inserting an arterial catheter. The arterial pressure waveform generated by a non-invasive finger cuff was reliable and in agreement with the radial artery blood pressure. A retrospective analysis was conducted by Frassanito et al. to determine the performance of HPI using arterial waveform recorded by a non-invasive finger probe to predict hypotension in patients undergoing CS under spinal anaesthesia. They have found that HPI, using this non-invasive probe, was able to predict hypotension with a sensitivity and specificity of 83% and 83% at 3 minutes, 97% and 97% at 2 minutes, and 100% and 100% at 1 minute, before it occurs.

This study aims to determine if the solution to reduce IOH lies in predicting intraoperative hypotension during lower segment ceaserean section (CS). The benefits of HPI may extend beyond reducing the incidence and severity of IOH, to bringing positive outcomes to the foetus. This study will determine whether integrating an early warning system produces benefits significant enough to justify changing our anaesthetic practice.

PROBLEM STATEMENT

Varying methods have been utilised to reduce IOH in CS. A novel software, HPI, was developed to predict hypotension, enabling clinicians to institute guided treatment before maternal hypotension occurs. The investigator need to determine if HPI has benefits in CS, thus leading to better maternal and neonatal outcomes.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Can HPI using the non-invasive continuous arterial pressure waveforms reduce the duration and severity of hypotension in patients undergoing CS under spinal anaesthesia?

OBJECTIVES

Study objective:

To determine if HPI has benefits in CS, thus leading to better maternal and neonatal outcomes compared to oNIBP.

Primary outcome:

The duration and severity of hypotensive events reported as a time-weighted average (TWA) - MAP < 65 mmHg in HPI group (intervention) versus standard oNIBP.

Secondary outcomes:

  1. To determine whether the use of HPI leads to better maternal outcomes (incidence of nausea and vomiting, blood loss, length of hospital stay, maternal satisfaction, incidence of surgical site infection)
  2. To determine whether the use of HPI leads to better foetal outcomes (Apgar scores, umbilical cord pH, length of hospital stay)
  3. To determine the amount of vasopressors and inotropes administered throughout CS if HPI is used versus conventional oNIBP monitoring

RESEARCH HYPOTHESIS

Additional parameters from HPI in the CS under spinal anaesthesia will reduce the duration and severity of intraoperative hypotension and provide better maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Being tested
Hypotension prediction index, Non invasive Blood Pressure Monitoring
Medical subject headings
Hypotension

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Hypotension prediction indexDevice

    Also called HPI

    HPI and other haemodynamics parameters, is available to the anaesthetist to view and act upon

  • Non invasive Blood Pressure MonitoringDevice

    Also called NIBP

    Anaesthetist will respond to hemodynamic variables using NIBP

Study groups in NCT06892665
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group 1: HPI GroupExperimentalThere were 2 arm group, in Group 1the Acumen IQ cuff, with HPI and other haemodynamics parameters, is available to the anaesthetist to view and act upon.
Receives: Device: Hypotension prediction index
Group 2: NIBP GroupPlacebo comparatorthe attending anaesthetist will be blinded from the HPI parameters.
Receives: Device: Non invasive Blood Pressure Monitoring

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Time-weighted average of Mean arterial pressure <65mmHg

    Calculated using a formula. TWA-MAP < 65 mmHg = (the depth of hypotension< MAP of 65 mmHg x time spent below a MAP of 65 mmHg (minutes))/(total duration of operation (minutes))

    Measured: From spinal anaesthesia to completion of surgery

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Incidence of nausea and vomiting,

    Maternal incidence of nausea and vomiting

    Measured: Perioperative up to 2 days

  2. length of hospital stay

    maternal length of hospital stay

    Measured: Perioperative up to 2 weeks

  3. maternal satisfaction

    Likert scale from 1 (very unsatisfied) to 5 (very satisfied)

    Measured: Perioperative up to 2 weeks

  4. incidence of surgical site infection

    maternal surgical site infection

    Measured: Perioperative up to 2 weeks

  5. Apgar score of feotal

    Apgar scores of 0-10 ( Apgar score of 7 and more is considered normal)

    Measured: 1 minute and 5 minutes after delivery

  6. Umbilical cord PH

    Umbilical cord PH taken after after delivery of baby

    Measured: Immediately upon delivery of baby

  7. Neonatal length of stay

    Neonatal length of stay

    Measured: Perioperative up to 2 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Mar 2025
  2. Study start1 Dec 2024
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2025
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
A prospective, double-blinded, randomised controlled trial
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
100 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06892665
Sponsor's protocol ID
JEP-2024-463
Status last verified
Jun 2026
First submitted
9 Mar 2025
Last updated
17 Jun 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: The data of the study will be available in public data repository

Publications

  • Murabito P, Astuto M, Sanfilippo F, La Via L, Vasile F, Basile F, Cappellani A, Longhitano L, Distefano A, Li Volti G. Proactive Management of Intraoperative Hypotension Reduces Biomarkers of Organ Injury and Oxidative Stress during Elective Non-Cardiac Surgery: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Med. 2022 Jan 13;11(2):392. doi: 10.3390/jcm11020392.

    PubMed 35054083
  • Sun LY, Wijeysundera DN, Tait GA, Beattie WS. Association of intraoperative hypotension with acute kidney injury after elective noncardiac surgery. Anesthesiology. 2015 Sep;123(3):515-23. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000765.

    PubMed 26181335
  • Frassanito L, Sonnino C, Piersanti A, Zanfini BA, Catarci S, Giuri PP, Scorzoni M, Gonnella GL, Antonelli M, Draisci G. Performance of the Hypotension Prediction Index With Noninvasive Arterial Pressure Waveforms in Awake Cesarean Delivery Patients Under Spinal Anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2022 Mar 1;134(3):633-643. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005754.

    PubMed 34591796
  • Andrzejewska A, Miegon J, Zacha S, Skonieczna-Zydecka K, Jarosz K, Zacha W, Biernawska J. The Impact of Intraoperative Haemodynamic Monitoring, Prediction of Hypotension and Goal-Directed Therapy on the Outcomes of Patients Treated with Posterior Fusion Due to Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis. J Clin Med. 2023 Jul 9;12(14):4571. doi: 10.3390/jcm12144571.

    PubMed 37510686

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Hypotension prediction index and Non invasive Blood Pressure Monitoring in people with Pregnancy Related and Hypotension, run by National University of Malaysia at 1 site in Malaysia.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Malaysia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Time-weighted average of Mean arterial pressure <65mmHg (time frame: From spinal anaesthesia to completion of surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06892665, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Jun 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in