MigraineMigPredNCT06893874
A Pragmatic Trial of Machine Prescription for Migraine
An observational study of Migraine, run by Norwegian University of Science and Technology at 1 site in Norway.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to estimate the ability of ML models to predict the effect of migraine preventives. This will be achieved by first identifying sociodemographic, headache and comorbidity features of migraine patients. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 99 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Migraine
- What is being tested?
- Preventive migraine treatment
- How many people
- 169 participants
- Where
- 1 siteNorway
- Study dates
- 1 Feb 2025to 17 Sep 2026
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 99 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: The study will include adult participants, aged 18 years or older, with episodic or chronic migraine according to ICHD-3 criteria.
Who may be able to join
- Aged 18 years or older at trial entry. Episodic or chronic migraine with or without aura as per ICHD-3 criteria. Onset of migraine before age 50 years. History of at least 4 days of migraine in the 4-week baseline period based on retrospective or prospective headache diary assessment or subject recall.
- Having recently (within last 4 weeks) started or planning to start a migraine preventive.
- Signed and dated informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Subject is concurrently using a migraine preventive that is not the drug under investigation.
- Subjects who have previously failed all six of the prophylactic treatments we are researching.
- Subjects diagnosed with trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias or facial neuralgias. Subjects with secondary headache conditions (except for medication overuse headache according to the ICHD-3).
- Subjects taking opioids (>3 days per month) or barbiturates at the time of screening.
- Alcohol overuse or illicit drug use. Subjects participating in another clinical investigation.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Norway1 site
NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Trondheim, 7030
About this study
Official title: A Pragmatic Observational Study to Investigate Machine Prescription as Compared to Treatment-as-usual in Adults Aged 18 Years or Older With Migraine
The purpose of this study is to estimate the ability of ML models to predict the effect of migraine preventives. This will be achieved by first identifying sociodemographic, headache and comorbidity features of migraine patients. Headache days will then be measured for 4 weeks before starting a migraine preventive, and this will be compared to the number of headache days in the first 12 weeks (divided into 28-day periods) after starting treatment. The preventive is regarded as effective if there is a 50% or greater reduction in monthly headache days. After observation of the treatment period, the ML models will use the sociodemographic, headache and comorbidity features, captured before treatment was initiated, to predict treatment effect for all preventives in each participant. These predicted treatment effects will be compared to the actual treatment effects that were observed.
Read the detailed description
Rationale As the pathophysiology of migraine is complex, the treatment responses of different migraine preventives are highly heterogeneous. Therefore, migraine patients often try out more than one preventive until an effective treatment is identified. If one can predict individualized treatment effects of these preventives, time to effective treatment may be reduced. The investigators propose that ML may be used to predict individualized treatment effects for migraine preventives (machine prescription).
The investigators are currently developing several ML models for this purpose. The first was developed in 2022 and uses clinical characteristics to estimate individualized treatment effects. The second is under development and uses a combination of genetic and clinical data, while the third will use sociodemographic data. Both of the two latter are trained to predict the effect of commonly used prophylactics in Norway. The result is three different ML models that use different sets of features to predict treatment effects. To compare the performances of these models, the investigators will conduct a pragmatic observational trial to test and compare the models in an independent dataset. Such out-of-sample testing is essential to establish the clinical applicability of the machine prescription models.
Objectives, Endpoints and Estimands The primary objective is to evaluate if machine prescription can predict the treatment effect of commonly used migraine preventives at the individual level. The endpoint for this objective will be the best machine prescription model's ability to predict treatment response (defined as 50% reduction in headache days) measured by ROC-AUC. Secondary objectives include investigating if time-to-treatment-response may be reduced using machine prescription, and if machine prescription more accurately selects the best first-line therapy for migraine at the individual level. Additionally, the investigators will explore developing ensemble models combining the pre-trained models, as well as creating new machine prescription models based on the collected data.
Overall design
This is a prospective observational trial. There will be no control method or blinding. The study population consists of participants with episodic and chronic migraine. Intervention will be standard migraine preventives as prescribed by the physician in care without any interference by the researchers. Each participant will be observed for at least 12 weeks after starting a preventive. Summarized, participation may be presented accordingly:
Screening/inclusion including phone consultation and feature questionnaire (week 0) Baseline (week -4 to 0) Treatment period (week 1 to 12) Follow-up phone call for outcome assessment (week 12) Optional additional treatment period (week 13 to 24) Optional additional follow-up phone call for outcome assessment (week 24)
Brief Summary The purpose of this study is to estimate the ability of ML models to predict the effect of migraine preventives. This will be achieved by first identifying sociodemographic, headache and comorbidity features of migraine patients. Headache days will then be measured for 4 weeks before starting a migraine preventive, and this will be compared to the number of headache days in the first 12 weeks (divided into 28-day periods) after starting treatment. The preventive is regarded as effective if there is a 50% or greater reduction in monthly headache days. After observation of the treatment period, the ML models will use the sociodemographic, headache and comorbidity features, captured before treatment was initiated, to predict treatment effect for all preventives in each participant. These predicted treatment effects will be compared to the actual treatment effects that were observed.
Study details include:
The study duration per participant will be up to 28 weeks. The treatment duration will be decided by the physician in care, but the treatment period in which the investigators will monitor headache days will be 12 weeks for each treatment, with up to two treatment periods for each participant.
The participants will have a phone consultation at inclusion and will have a follow-up phone call at the end of the - or possibly both - treatment period(s) of 12 weeks.
Number of Participants A maximum of 200 participants will be enrolled. Note: Enrolled means participants', or their legally acceptable representatives', agreement to participate in a clinical study following completion of the informed consent process [and screening]. Potential participants who are screened for the purpose of determining eligibility for the study, but do not participate in the study, are not considered enrolled, unless otherwise specified by the protocol. A participant will be considered enrolled if the informed consent is not withdrawn prior to participating in any study activity after screening.
Study Arms and Duration There is one study arm. Study duration is described under "Brief Summary".
Data Monitoring There will be no data monitoring committee as it is not applicable for this study.
- Conditions
- Migraine
- Being tested
- Preventive migraine treatment
- Medical subject headings
- Migraine Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Preventive migraine treatmentOther
Participants will be observed while receiving treatment-as-usual for their migraine by their treating physician
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Prediction of treatment effect
The primary endpoint is to investigate the machine prescription models' ability to predict treatment effect of migraine preventives. To assess this, there will be one binary label of effect versus no effect for each preventive (if a participant has not tried a preventive, the instance will be categorized as missing). The three models will then be applied to the analysis sets, and their label predictions will be compared to the true labels, in a sense using the whole analysis sets as traditional machine learning test sets. The best performing model according to ROC-AUC will be reported.
Measured: 12 weeks
Secondary outcomes (3)
Time-to-treatment response
The first secondary endpoint is time-to-treatment-response assuming sequential 12-week trials of preventives using machine prescription compared to treatment-as-usual. The predicted effect of each preventive for every participant will be used to generate individualized rankings of preventive effect. Assuming the preventives are given sequentially according to each participant's own preventive ranking, it is possible to estimate how many preventives are expected to be tried before reaching preventive success. This estimation will be compared to treatment-as-usual, which in the study is defined as the preventives participants receive from their physician in care.
Measured: 12 weeks
Rate of successful first therapy
Ratio of successful first therapy using machine prescription as compared to treatment-as-usual. Each machine prescription model will predict a preventive with the highest probability of effect for every participant. For the participants who received the predicted first choice preventive, the percentage of participants with effect (more than 50% reduction in headache days) will be estimated. For comparison with treatment-as usual, the percentage of participants who had effect of the first preventive given during the study will be estimated. The proportions of successful treatments will be compared with appropriate statistical tests.
Measured: 12 weeks
External validity
Comparison of external validity and performance, measured by AUC, of the different machine prescription models. AUC will be calculated and presented as a ROC-curve for each model.
Measured: 12 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Mar 2025
- Study start1 Feb 2025
- Primary completion17 Sep 2026
- Study completion17 Sep 2026
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for MigraineStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Norwegian University of Science and TechnologyThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 169 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Norwegian University of Science and Technology
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Anker Stubberud, Principal investigator, Norwegian University of Science and Technology
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06893874
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2726471
- Acronym
- MigPred
- Status last verified
- Oct 2026
- First submitted
- 18 Mar 2025
- Last updated
- 21 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Contains sensitive personal information
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Pragmatic Observational Study to Investigate Machine Prescription as Compared to Treatment-as-usual in Adults Aged 18 Years or Older With Migraine
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06893874
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MigPred / 2726471
- Conditions
- Migraine
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 169 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Norwegian University of Science and TechnologyUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Feb 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 17 Sep 2026 (actual)
- Study completion
- 17 Sep 2026 (actual)
- First posted
- 25 Mar 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to estimate the ability of ML models to predict the effect of migraine preventives. This will be achieved by first identifying sociodemographic, headache and comorbidity features of migraine patients. Headache days will then be measured for 4 weeks before starting a migraine preventive, and this will be compared to the number of headache days in the first 12 weeks (divided into 28-day periods) after starting treatment. The preventive is regarded as effective if there is a 50% or greater reduction in monthly headache days. After observation of the treatment period, the ML models will use the sociodemographic, headache and comorbidity features, captured before treatment was initiated, to predict treatment effect for all preventives in each participant. These predicted treatment effects will be compared to the actual treatment effects that were observed.
Detailed description
Rationale As the pathophysiology of migraine is complex, the treatment responses of different migraine preventives are highly heterogeneous. Therefore, migraine patients often try out more than one preventive until an effective treatment is identified. If one can predict individualized treatment effects of these preventives, time to effective treatment may be reduced. The investigators propose that ML may be used to predict individualized treatment effects for migraine preventives (machine prescription).
The investigators are currently developing several ML models for this purpose. The first was developed in 2022 and uses clinical characteristics to estimate individualized treatment effects. The second is under development and uses a combination of genetic and clinical data, while the third will use sociodemographic data. Both of the two latter are trained to predict the effect of commonly used prophylactics in Norway. The result is three different ML models that use different sets of features to predict treatment effects. To compare the performances of these models, the investigators will conduct a pragmatic observational trial to test and compare the models in an independent dataset. Such out-of-sample testing is essential to establish the clinical applicability of the machine prescription models.
Objectives, Endpoints and Estimands The primary objective is to evaluate if machine prescription can predict the treatment effect of commonly used migraine preventives at the individual level. The endpoint for this objective will be the best machine prescription model's ability to predict treatment response (defined as 50% reduction in headache days) measured by ROC-AUC. Secondary objectives include investigating if time-to-treatment-response may be reduced using machine prescription, and if machine prescription more accurately selects the best first-line therapy for migraine at the individual level. Additionally, the investigators will explore developing ensemble models combining the pre-trained models, as well as creating new machine prescription models based on the collected data.
Overall design
This is a prospective observational trial. There will be no control method or blinding. The study population consists of participants with episodic and chronic migraine. Intervention will be standard migraine preventives as prescribed by the physician in care without any interference by the researchers. Each participant will be observed for at least 12 weeks after starting a preventive. Summarized, participation may be presented accordingly:
Screening/inclusion including phone consultation and feature questionnaire (week 0) Baseline (week -4 to 0) Treatment period (week 1 to 12) Follow-up phone call for outcome assessment (week 12) Optional additional treatment period (week 13 to 24) Optional additional follow-up phone call for outcome assessment (week 24)
Brief Summary The purpose of this study is to estimate the ability of ML models to predict the effect of migraine preventives. This will be achieved by first identifying sociodemographic, headache and comorbidity features of migraine patients. Headache days will then be measured for 4 weeks before starting a migraine preventive, and this will be compared to the number of headache days in the first 12 weeks (divided into 28-day periods) after starting treatment. The preventive is regarded as effective if there is a 50% or greater reduction in monthly headache days. After observation of the treatment period, the ML models will use the sociodemographic, headache and comorbidity features, captured before treatment was initiated, to predict treatment effect for all preventives in each participant. These predicted treatment effects will be compared to the actual treatment effects that were observed.
Study details include:
The study duration per participant will be up to 28 weeks. The treatment duration will be decided by the physician in care, but the treatment period in which the investigators will monitor headache days will be 12 weeks for each treatment, with up to two treatment periods for each participant.
The participants will have a phone consultation at inclusion and will have a follow-up phone call at the end of the - or possibly both - treatment period(s) of 12 weeks.
Number of Participants A maximum of 200 participants will be enrolled. Note: Enrolled means participants', or their legally acceptable representatives', agreement to participate in a clinical study following completion of the informed consent process [and screening]. Potential participants who are screened for the purpose of determining eligibility for the study, but do not participate in the study, are not considered enrolled, unless otherwise specified by the protocol. A participant will be considered enrolled if the informed consent is not withdrawn prior to participating in any study activity after screening.
Study Arms and Duration There is one study arm. Study duration is described under "Brief Summary".
Data Monitoring There will be no data monitoring committee as it is not applicable for this study.
Study design
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 99 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- The study will include adult participants, aged 18 years or older, with episodic or chronic migraine according to ICHD-3 criteria.
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Aged 18 years or older at trial entry. Episodic or chronic migraine with or without aura as per ICHD-3 criteria. Onset of migraine before age 50 years. History of at least 4 days of migraine in the 4-week baseline period based on retrospective or prospective headache diary assessment or subject recall.
- Having recently (within last 4 weeks) started or planning to start a migraine preventive.
- Signed and dated informed consent.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Subject is concurrently using a migraine preventive that is not the drug under investigation.
- Subjects who have previously failed all six of the prophylactic treatments we are researching.
- Subjects diagnosed with trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias or facial neuralgias. Subjects with secondary headache conditions (except for medication overuse headache according to the ICHD-3).
- Subjects taking opioids (>3 days per month) or barbiturates at the time of screening.
- Alcohol overuse or illicit drug use. Subjects participating in another clinical investigation.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Preventive migraine treatmentParticipants will be observed while receiving treatment-as-usual for their migraine by their treating physician | Other | – |
Primary outcome
Prediction of treatment effect
Time frame: 12 weeks
The primary endpoint is to investigate the machine prescription models' ability to predict treatment effect of migraine preventives. To assess this, there will be one binary label of effect versus no effect for each preventive (if a participant has not tried a preventive, the instance will be categorized as missing). The three models will then be applied to the analysis sets, and their label predictions will be compared to the true labels, in a sense using the whole analysis sets as traditional machine learning test sets. The best performing model according to ROC-AUC will be reported.
3 secondary outcomes
Time-to-treatment response
Time frame: 12 weeks
Rate of successful first therapy
Time frame: 12 weeks
External validity
Time frame: 12 weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Oct 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Contains sensitive personal information
Related trials for Migraine
RecruitingObservational study
Study of the Glymphatic System in Migraine
Migraine
Active, not recruiting
Clinical and Neurophysiological Effects of tDCS to Visual and Motor Cortex in Migraine
Migraine
Active, not recruiting
App-Based Migraine Treatment: The Health enSuite Study
Migraine, Migraine With Aura
Not yet recruiting
A Prospective Study of Rimegepant for Short-term Preventive Treatment of Night-shift-related Migraine in Healthcare Professionals
Migraine Disorders
Recruiting
Marine Lipids Ease Painful TMD
Temporomandibular Disorder (TMD)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Anker Stubberud principal investigator
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Migraine, run by Norwegian University of Science and Technology at 1 site in Norway.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Norway. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Prediction of treatment effect (time frame: 12 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Oct 2026.